Uniform vascular enhancement of lower-extremity artery on CT angiography using test-injection monitoring at the central level of the scan range: a simulation flow phantom study with clinical correlation

[Study of CT Automatic Exposure Control System (CT-AEC) Optimization in CT Angiography of Lower Extremity Artery by Considering Contrast-to-Noise Ratio]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the image quality and effect of radiation dose reduction by setting for computed tomography automatic exposure control system (CT-AEC) in computed tomographic angiography (CTA) of lower extremity artery.

METHODS

Two methods of setting were compared for CT-AEC [conventional and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) methods]. Conventional method was set noise index (NI): 14and tube current threshold: 10-750 mA. CNR method was set NI: 18, minimum tube current: (X+Y)/2 mA (X, Y: maximum X (Y)-axis tube current value of leg in NI: 14), and maximum tube current: 750 mA. The image quality was evaluated by CNR, and radiation dose reduction was evaluated by dose-length-product (DLP).

RESULTS

In conventional method, mean CNRs for pelvis, femur, and leg were 19.9±4.8, 20.4±5.4, and 16.2±4.3, respectively. There was a significant difference between the CNRs of pelvis and leg (P<0.001), and between femur and leg (P<0.001). In CNR method, mean CNRs for pelvis, femur, and leg were 15.2±3.3, 15.3±3.2, and 15.3±3.1, respectively; no significant difference between pelvis, femur, and leg (P=0.973) in CNR method was observed. Mean DLPs were 1457±434 mGy⋅cm in conventional method, and 1049±434 mGy·cm in CNR method. There was a significant difference in the DLPs of conventional method and CNR method (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

CNR method gave equal CNRs for pelvis, femur, and leg, and was beneficial for radiation dose reduction in CTA of lower extremity artery.

Low contrast volume run-off CT angiography with optimized scan time based on double-level test bolus technique--feasibility study

PURPOSE

To verify the technical feasibility of low contrast volume (40 mL) run-off CT angiography (run-off CTA) with the individual scan time optimization based on double-level test bolus technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study of 92 consecutive patients who underwent run-off CTA performed with 40 mL of contrast medium (injection rate of 6 mL/s) and optimized scan times on a second generation of dual-source CT. Individual optimized scan times were calculated from aortopopliteal transit times obtained on the basis of double-level test bolus technique--the single injection of 10 mL test bolus and dynamic acquisitions in two levels (abdominal aorta and popliteal arteries). Intraluminal attenuation (HU) was measured in 6 levels (aorta, iliac, femoral and popliteal arteries, middle and distal lower-legs) and subjective quality (3-point score) was assessed. Relations of image quality, test bolus parameters and arterial circulation involvement were analyzed.

RESULTS

High mean attenuation (HU) values (468; 437; 442; 440; 342; 274) and quality score in all monitored levels was achieved. In 91 patients (0.99) the sufficient diagnostic quality (score 1-2) in aorta, iliac and femoral arteries was determined. A total of 6 patients (0.07) were not evaluable in distal lower-legs. Only the weak indirect correlation of image quality and test-bolus parameters was proved in iliac, femoral and popliteal levels (r values: -0.263, -0.298 and -0.254). The statistically significant difference of the test-bolus parameters and image quality was proved in patients with occlusive and aneurysmal disease.

CONCLUSION

We proved the technical feasibility and sufficient quality of run-off CTA with low volume of contrast medium and optimized scan time according to aortopopliteal transit time calculated from double-level test bolus.

Effect of region-of-interest placement in bolus tracking cerebral computed tomography angiography

INTRODUCTION

Premature or delayed triggering of semiautomatic contrast tracking during intracranial computed tomographic angiography can occur due to artifact from dense contrast in the superior vena cava or brachiocephalic veins near the anterior aortic arch. We determine if placement of bolus tracking region-of-interest in the posterior thoracic aorta can prevent suboptimal intracranial arterial opacification.

METHODS

Intracranial computed tomography angiographies from 80 patients performed on the same scanner were retrospectively evaluated. Thirty-seven consecutive patients with bolus tracking region-of-interest (ROI) placed in the anterior thoracic aorta (group A) and 43 consecutive patients with ROI placed in the posterior thoracic arch (group B) were identified. Two neuroradiologists scored the quality of intracranial computed tomography angiography on a four-point scale. Quantitative measurement of intracranial arterial opacification was also performed. The proportions of patients with poorest quality score as well as the proportions of the patients with the worst degree of intracranial arterial opacification (<10th percentile) were compared between groups A and B using two-sample proportion test.

RESULTS

Qualitative evaluation of the intracranial computed tomography angiography showed 4 (11%) patients in group A with poor quality (score of 1), while all patients in group B scored 2 or higher (p = 0.028). Seven (19%) patients in group A had the lowest quantitative score (mean arterial opacification < 10th percentile) while 1 (2.5%) patient in group B had the lowest score (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Bolus tracking in the posterior thoracic aorta reduces the chance of suboptimal intracranial computed tomography angiography.