1
|
Busse NC, Al‐Ghazi MSAL, Abi‐Jaoudeh N, Alvarez D, Ayan AS, Chen E, Chuong MD, Dezarn WA, Enger SA, Graves SA, Hobbs RF, Jafari ME, Kim SP, Maughan NM, Polemi AM, Stickel JR. AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 14.a: Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14157. [PMID: 37820316 PMCID: PMC10860558 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Radioembolization using Yttrium-90 (90 Y) microspheres is widely used to treat primary and metastatic liver tumors. The present work provides minimum practice guidelines for establishing and supporting such a program. Medical physicists play a key role in patient and staff safety during these procedures. Products currently available are identified and their properties and suppliers summarized. Appropriateness for use is the domain of the treating physician. Patient work up starts with pre-treatment imaging. First, a mapping study using Technetium-99m (Tc-99m ) is carried out to quantify the lung shunt fraction (LSF) and to characterize the vascular supply of the liver. An MRI, CT, or a PET-CT scan is used to obtain information on the tumor burden. The tumor volume, LSF, tumor histology, and other pertinent patient characteristics are used to decide the type and quantity of 90 Y to be ordered. On the day of treatment, the appropriate dose is assayed using a dose calibrator with a calibration traceable to a national standard. In the treatment suite, the care team led by an interventional radiologist delivers the dose using real-time image guidance. The treatment suite is posted as a radioactive area during the procedure and staff wear radiation dosimeters. The treatment room, patient, and staff are surveyed post-procedure. The dose delivered to the patient is determined from the ratio of pre-treatment and residual waste exposure rate measurements. Establishing such a treatment modality is a major undertaking requiring an institutional radioactive materials license amendment complying with appropriate federal and state radiation regulations and appropriate staff training commensurate with their respective role and function in the planning and delivery of the procedure. Training, documentation, and areas for potential failure modes are identified and guidance is provided to ameliorate them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nadine Abi‐Jaoudeh
- Department of Radiological SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineCaliforniaUSA
| | - Diane Alvarez
- Baptist HospitalMiami Cancer InstituteMiamiFloridaUSA
| | - Ahmet S. Ayan
- Department of Radiation OncologyOhio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Erli Chen
- Department of Radiation OncologyCheshire Medical CenterKeeneNew HampshireUSA
| | - Michael D. Chuong
- Department of Radiation OncologyMiami Cancer InstituteMiamiFloridaUSA
| | - William A. Dezarn
- Department of Radiation OncologyWake Forest University School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | | | - Robert F. Hobbs
- Department of Radiation OncologyJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Mary Ellen Jafari
- Diagnostic Physics, Atlantic Health SystemMorristown Medical CenterMorristownNew JerseyUSA
| | - S. Peter Kim
- Medical Physics UnitMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
| | - Nichole M. Maughan
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington University in St. LouisSaint LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Andrew M. Polemi
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mee SF, Polan DF, Dewaraja YK, Cuneo KC, Gemmete JJ, Evans JR, Lawrence TS, Dow JS, Mikell JK. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) following Yttrium-90 ( 90Y) selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT): a feasibility planning study using 90Y delivered dose. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:065003. [PMID: 36780696 PMCID: PMC10001703 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acbbb5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
Objective.90Y selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can potentially underdose lesions, as identified on post-therapy PET/CT imaging. This study introduces a methodology and explores the feasibility for selectively treating SIRT-underdosed HCC lesions, or lesion subvolumes, with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) following post-SIRT dosimetry.Approach. We retrospectively analyzed post-treatment PET/CT images of 20 HCC patients after90Y SIRT. Predicted tumor response from SIRT was quantified based on personalized post-therapy dosimetry and corresponding response models. Predicted non-responding tumor regions were then targeted with a hypothetical SBRT boost plan using a framework for selecting eligible tumors and tumor subregions. SBRT boost plans were compared to SBRT plans targeting all tumors irrespective of SIRT dose with the same prescription and organ-at-risk (OAR) objectives. The potential benefit of SIRT followed by a SBRT was evaluated based on OAR dose and predicted toxicity compared to the independent SBRT treatment.Main results. Following SIRT, 14/20 patients had at least one predicted non-responding tumor considered eligible for a SBRT boost. When comparing SBRT plans, 10/14 (71%) SBRTboostand 12/20 (60%) SBRTaloneplans were within OAR dose constraints. For three patients, SBRTboostplans were within OAR constraints while SBRTaloneplans were not. Across the 14 eligible patients, SBRTboostplans had significantly less dose to the healthy liver (decrease in mean dose was on average ± standard deviation, 2.09 Gy ± 1.99 Gy, ) and reduced the overall targeted PTV volume (39% ± 21%) compared with SBRTalone.Significance. A clinical methodology for treating HCC using a synergized SIRT and SBRT approach is presented, demonstrating that it could reduce normal tissue toxicity risk in a majority of our retrospectively evaluated cases. Selectively targeting SIRT underdosed HCC lesions, or lesion subvolumes, with SBRT could improve tumor control and patient outcomes post-SIRT and allow SIRT to function as a target debulking tool for cases when SBRT is not independently feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen F Mee
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.,School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Daniel F Polan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Yuni K Dewaraja
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Kyle C Cuneo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Joseph J Gemmete
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Joseph R Evans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Theodore S Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Janell S Dow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Justin K Mikell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Waddell JJ, Townsend PH, Collins ZS, Walter C. Liver-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Colon Cancer: Update. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-022-00474-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
4
|
The Role of Ablative Radiotherapy to Liver Oligometastases from Colorectal Cancer. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-021-00472-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
This review describes recent data supporting locoregional ablative radiation in the treatment of oligometastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Recent Findings
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) demonstrates high rates of local control in colorectal cancer liver metastases when a biologically equivalent dose of > 100 Gy is delivered. Future innovations to improve the efficacy of SBRT include MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) to enhance target accuracy, systemic immune activation to treat extrahepatic disease, and genomic customization. Selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) with y-90 is an intra-arterial therapy that delivers high doses to liver metastases internally which has shown to increase liver disease control in phase 3 trials. Advancements in transarterial radioembolization (TARE) dosimetry could improve local control and decrease toxicity.
Summary
SBRT and SIRT are both promising options in treating unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases. Identification of oligometastatic patients who receive long-term disease control from either therapy is essential. Future advancements focusing on improving radiation design and customization could further improve efficacy and toxicity.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abbott EM, Falzone N, Lenzo N, Vallis KA. Combining External Beam Radiation and Radionuclide Therapies: Rationale, Radiobiology, Results and Roadblocks. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:735-743. [PMID: 34544640 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The emergence of effective radionuclide therapeutics, such as radium-223 dichloride, [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA ligands, over the last 10 years is driving a rapid expansion in molecular radiotherapy (MRT) research. Clinical trials that are underway will help to define optimal dosing protocols and identify groups of patients who are likely to benefit from this form of treatment. Clinical investigations are also being conducted to combine new MRT agents with other anticancer drugs, with particular emphasis on DNA repair inhibitors and immunotherapeutics. In this review, the case is presented for combining MRT with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). The technical and dosimetric challenges of combining two radiotherapeutic modalities have impeded progress in the past. However, the need for research into the specific radiobiological effects of radionuclide therapy, which has lagged behind that for EBRT, has been recognised. This, together with innovations in imaging technology, MRT dosimetry tools and EBRT hardware, will facilitate the future use of this important combination of treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Abbott
- MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
| | - N Falzone
- GenesisCare, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - N Lenzo
- GenesisCare Theranostics, St John of God Murdoch Cancer Centre, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; Department of Medicine, Notre Dame University Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - K A Vallis
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|