The impact of prolonged waiting time for coronary care unit admission on patients with non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome

Association of Prolonged Emergency Department Length of Stay with Adverse Events in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Objective

To study the association between prolonged emergency department length of stay (EDLOS) and in-hospital adverse events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, the medical records of 738 patients diagnosed with NSTE-ACS and admitted to the emergency department (ED) from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2019 were reviewed. The patients were categorized into groups with EDLOS < 4 hours and EDLOS ≥ 4 hours, and baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, Killip classification, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score, investigations, use of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1-hour and 0/3-hour algorithms, and treatments in the ED were compared between the groups. The associations of in-hospital adverse events with EDLOS were examined using univariate logistic regression.

Results

Four hundred and twenty-three (57.3%) patients had an EDLOS of ≥ 4 hours, and the median (IQR) EDLOS was 4.48 hours (3.03, 6.20 hours). EDLOS ≥ 4 h was associated with a prolonged time to receive P2Y₁₂ inhibitors and anticoagulants (P < 0.001). However, the two groups showed no significant differences in in-hospital adverse events (congestive heart failure [CHF], shock, stroke or transient ischemic attack [TIA], major bleeding, arrhythmia, recurrent myocardial infarction, death, and one or more adverse events). Nevertheless, a non-significant trend for a higher rate of adverse events (CHF, shock, major bleeding, arrhythmia, recurrent myocardial infarction, death, and one or more adverse events) with longer EDLOS was observed in the subgroup of patients who received diuretic or antiarrhythmic drugs, ventilator or bilevel positive airway pressure support, oxygen support, or inotropic/vasopressor drugs in the ED.

Conclusion

Prolonged EDLOS showed a significant association with longer times to receive P2Y₁₂ inhibitors and anticoagulants. However, the EDLOS < 4 hour and EDLOS ≥ 4 hour groups of patients with NSTE-ACS showed no significant differences in the rates of in-hospital adverse events. Patients who receive cardiovascular medications in the ED or are on respiratory support should be hospitalized as soon as practically possible. Proper use of the 0/1-hour algorithm over the 0/3-hour algorithm without unnecessary repeated cardiac troponin tests in the ED could reduce the EDLOS in patients with NSTE-ACS.

Long emergency department length of stay: A concept analysis

INTRODUCTION

Emergency Department (ED) Length of stay (LOS) has been associated with poor patient outcomes, which has led to the implementation of time targets designed to keep EDLOS below a specific limit. The cut-offs defining long EDLOS varies across settings and seem to be arbitrarily chosen. This study aimed to clarify the meaning of long EDLOS.

METHODS

A concept analysis using the Walker and Avant approach was conducted. It included a literature search aiming to identify all uses of the concept, resulting in a set of defining attributes and a way of measuring the concept empirically.

RESULTS

Long EDLOS was primarily used as proxy for other phenomena, e.g. boarding or crowding. The definitions had cut-offs ranging between 4 and 48 h. The attributes defining long EDLOS was waiting, a crowded ED environment and an inefficient organization.

DISCUSSION

Time targets are probably more suitable when directed towards and tailored for specific sub-groups of the ED population.