Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in television medical dramas: Results of the TVMD2 study

House: Practical Abilities Represented on Television and Impact on mEdical Students ('House PARTIES')

[26 May 2025]: This article was published in Early View in error. The article is under embargo and will republish in December 2025.

Evolution of Investigating Informed Assent Discussions about CPR in Seriously Ill Patients

CONTEXT

Outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remain poor. We have spent 10 years investigating an "informed assent" (IA) approach to discussing CPR with chronically ill patients/families. IA is a discussion framework whereby patients extremely unlikely to benefit from CPR are informed that unless they disagree, CPR will not be performed because it will not help achieve their goals, thus removing the burden of decision-making from the patient/family, while they retain an opportunity to disagree.

OBJECTIVES

Determine the acceptability and efficacy of IA discussions about CPR with older chronically ill patients/families.

METHODS

This multi-site research occurred in three stages. Stage I determined acceptability of the intervention through focus groups of patients with advanced COPD or malignancy, family members, and physicians. Stage II was an ambulatory pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the IA discussion. Stage III is an ongoing phase 2 RCT of IA versus attention control in in patients with advanced chronic illness.

RESULTS

Our qualitative work found the IA approach was acceptable to most patients, families, and physicians. The pilot RCT demonstrated feasibility and showed an increase in participants in the intervention group changing from "full code" to "do not resuscitate" within two weeks after the intervention. However, Stages I and II found that IA is best suited to inpatients. Our phase 2 RCT in older hospitalized seriously ill patients is ongoing; results are pending.

CONCLUSIONS

IA is a feasible and reasonable approach to CPR discussions in selected patient populations.

Depiction of Resuscitation on Medical Dramas: Proposed Effect on Patient Expectations

The public has unrealistic views regarding the success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and one potential source of misinformation is medical dramas. Prior research has shown that depictions of resuscitation on television are skewed towards younger patients with acute injuries, while most cardiac arrests occur in older patients as a result of medical comorbidities. Additionally, the success rate of televised resuscitations on older shows has vastly exceeded good outcomes in the real world. We sought to understand resuscitation outcomes on current medical dramas and to review the literature for evidence that media affects patient decision-making. We reviewed medical dramas to evaluate the demographics of cardiac arrest victims and the success rate of resuscitations and compared the results to outcomes for real-world patients. Medical dramas continue to focus on trauma as the main cause of cardiac arrest and portray favorable outcomes more frequently than should be expected. Patients who believe the overly optimistic prognoses portrayed on television may be more likely to desire aggressive medical care in the face of serious illness. Healthcare workers should anticipate the need to counter misinformation when discussing patient goals of care and end-of-life planning.