Determination and Validation of Thresholds of Anterior Chamber Parameters by Dedicated Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography

Diagnostic Abilities of Three-Dimensional Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in Detecting Angle Closure

PRCIS

Three-dimensional (3D) angle parameters and cutoff values for detecting angle closure were proposed. The 3D parameters demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance. Certain horizontal two-dimensional (2D) parameters [ie, trabecular iris space area (TISA)-750, angle opening distance (AOD)-750, and AOD-500] can attain similar performance to their high-performing 3D counterparts.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic performance of single horizontal 2D versus 3D angle parameters from swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA2) in detecting angle closure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cross-sectional study included 118 phakic patients (59 open angles, 59 closed angles). AOD, angle recess area (ARA), and TISA at 250, 500, and 750 μm from scleral spur were measured in 360-degree radial-scan images. The 3D information of each measurement was analyzed in 2 patterns: (1) average 3D parameter-the averaged value from 360-degree angle values and (2) estimate 3D parameter-the estimation of surface area of circumferential angle inlet (using AOD) or circumferential angle volume (using ARA and TISA). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve [areas under the curve (AUCs)] of eighteen 3D parameters were compared with 2D horizontal parameters.

RESULTS

Among 3D parameters, AOD-500 estimate 3D gave the highest AUC (AUC: 0.950, cutoff: 6.09 mm 2 ), followed by AOD-750 estimate 3D (AUC: 0.948, cutoff: 8.26 mm 2 ). 3D parameters significantly increased the AUC of ARA-250 and TISA-250 (all P < 0.02) compared with the 2D parameters. No significant improvement in AUC was demonstrated for AOD-250 and all parameters at 500 and 750 μm. No significant difference in AUC was found among the 6 maximum AUC parameters, which were AOD-750 horizontal 2D, AOD-500 estimate 3D, TISA-750 horizontal 2D, AOD-500 horizontal 2D, AOD-750 estimate 3D, and TISA-750 average 3D.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D-angle parameters had high performance in detecting angle closure. However, comparing a horizontal measurement to 3D parameters, the AUC improvement was mostly insignificant.

Anterior Segment OCT for Detection of Narrow Angles: A Community-Based Diagnostic Accuracy Study

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT) screening for detecting gonioscopically narrow angles.

DESIGN

Population-based cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

A stratified random sample of individuals aged ≥ 60 years, selected from a door-to-door census performed in low-lying Nepal.

TESTING

Participants underwent AS-OCT, posterior segment OCT, and intraocular pressure (IOP) testing in the community. Those meeting referral criteria in either eye were invited to have a comprehensive eye examination including gonioscopy. Referral criteria included (i) the lowest 2.5% of AS-OCT measurements, (ii) retinal OCT results suggestive of glaucomatous optic neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy, or age-related macular degeneration, and (iii) elevated IOP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity and specificity of 5 semiautomated AS-OCT parameters relative to gonioscopically narrow angles, defined as the absence of visible trabecular meshwork for ≥ 180° on nonindentation gonioscopy.

RESULTS

Of 17 656 people aged ≥ 60 years enumerated from 102 communities, 12 633 (71.6%) presented for AS-OCT testing. Referral was recommended for 697 participants based on AS-OCT criteria and 2419 participants based on other criteria, of which 858 had gonioscopy performed by a glaucoma specialist. Each of the 5 AS-OCT parameters offered good diagnostic information for predicting eyes with gonioscopically narrow angles, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.85 to 0.89. The angle opening distance at 750 μm from the scleral spur (AOD750) provided the most diagnostic information, providing an optimal sensitivity of 87% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75%-96%) and specificity of 77% (71%-83%) at a cutpoint of 367 μm, and a sensitivity of 65% (95% CI, 54%-74%) when specificity was constrained to 90% (cutpoint, 283 μm).

CONCLUSIONS

On AS-OCT, the AOD750 parameter detected approximately two-thirds of cases of gonioscopically narrow angles when test specificity was set to 90%. Although such a sensitivity may not be sufficient when screening solely for narrow angles, AS-OCT requires little additional effort if posterior segment OCT is already being performed and thus could provide incremental benefit when performing OCT-based screening.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Automatic measurement of anterior chamber angle parameters in AS-OCT images using deep learning

The early assessment of angle closure is of great significance for the timely diagnosis and treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) provides a fast and non-contact way to evaluate the angle close using the iris root (IR) and scleral spur (SS) information. The objective of this study was to develop a deep learning method to automatically detect IR and SS in AS-OCT for measuring anterior chamber (AC) angle parameters including angle opening distance (AOD), trabecular iris space area (TISA), trabecular iris angle (TIA), and anterior chamber angle (ACA). 3305 AS-OCT images from 362 eyes and 203 patients were collected and analyzed. Based on the recently proposed transformer-based architecture that learns to capture long-range dependencies by leveraging the self-attention mechanism, a hybrid convolutional neural network (CNN) and transformer model to encode both local and global features was developed to automatically detect IR and SS in AS-OCT images. Experiments demonstrated that our algorithm achieved a significantly better performance than state-of-the-art methods for AS-OCT and medical image analysis with a precision of 0.941, a sensitivity of 0.914, an F1 score of 0.927, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 37.1±25.3 µm for IR, and a precision of 0.805, a sensitivity of 0.847, an F1 score of 0.826, and an MAE of 41.4±29.4 µm for SS, and a high agreement with expert human analysts for AC angle parameter measurement. We further demonstrated the application of the proposed method to evaluate the effect of cataract surgery with IOL implantation in a PACG patient and to assess the outcome of ICL implantation in a patient with high myopia with a potential risk of developing PACG. The proposed method can accurately detect IR and SS in AS-OCT images and effectively facilitate the AC angle parameter measurement for pre- and post-operative management of PACG.

Comparison of Iridocorneal Angle Assessments in Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Patients: Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and Gonioscopy

Purpose

To quantitatively compare iridocorneal angle assessments using gonioscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).

Patients

US and Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and/or ocular hypertension (OHT).

Methods

Analysis was pooled from 2 multicenter, noninterventional studies conducted in the US and China. Gonioscopy Shaffer grade and an AS-OCT method that approximates the angle width relative to local morphologic variations were compared by measuring the same iridocorneal angles. A third, separate, single-center, noninterventional study was conducted to verify results observed from the pooled analysis.

Results

From the pooled studies, a total of 239 eyes were measured using Shaffer grade and AS-OCT. Of these, 6 were Shaffer grade 2, 37 in Shaffer grade 3, and 196 in Shaffer grade 4. There was a trend of increasing Shaffer grade with increasing AS-OCT angle width. Open iridocorneal angles, Shaffer grade ≥3, had a ~98% sensitivity and 88% positive predictive value for identifying AS-OCT angle width ≥300 µm, using the AS-OCT method. To verify these results, a total of 28 right eyes were imaged for the third study. A trend of increasing Shaffer grade with increasing AS-OCT angle width was observed, and angles with Shaffer grade ≤2 had AS-OCT angle width <300 µm.

Conclusion

The AS-OCT method can determine the space in the anterior chamber and can potentially identify angles that are the appropriate size for certain glaucoma devices. Information gathered from AS-OCT can provide additional comprehensive and quantitative assessment to gonioscopy.

Diagnostic accuracy of AS-OCT vs gonioscopy for detecting angle closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

This study aims to review the literature that compares the accuracy of Anterior Segment-Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) against gonioscopy in detecting eyes with angle closure. It is currently unclear how AS-OCT fits into clinical practice for detecting angle closure. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A literature search was performed on Medline, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify studies that investigated the diagnostic accuracy of AS-OCT in detecting eyes with angle closure as diagnosed by gonioscopy. Eligible studies included in the analysis met stringent inclusion criteria determining the sensitivity and specificity of AS-OCT.

Results

The initial search identified 727 studies, of which 23 were included in the final analysis. We found substantial variation in the parameters being studied and methodologies. The sensitivity of AS-OCT ranged from 46 to 100% (median 87%). Twenty-one studies identified parameters that showed sensitivity above 80%. The specificity ranged from 55.3 to 100% (median 84%).

Conclusion

AS-OCT demonstrates good sensitivity for detecting angle closure. It may provide an avenue to address high rates of undiagnosed angle closure, such as found in developing Asian countries. However, AS-OCT is not yet able to replace gonioscopy. Clinicians should consider whether the diagnostic accuracy of AS-OCT is acceptable for their specific clinical use before adopting it. More studies are needed to determine the utility of AS-OCT, including longitudinal studies to determine the significance of eyes classified to have closed angles by AS-OCT but open on gonioscopy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00417-021-05271-4.

Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (ASOCT) Parameters to Determine Pupillary Block Versus Plateau Iris Configuration

PRéCIS:: The potential parameters for differentiating pupillary block (PB) from plateau iris configuration (PIC) on anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) are lens/pupil size parameters and angles. Further study is needed to determine a landmark peripheral to the centroid of the iris.

PURPOSE

Investigate anterior segment parameters to distinguish between 2 mechanisms of angle closure, PB and PIC, using swept-source Fourier domain ASOCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective ASOCT images from narrow angle eyes were reviewed. PIC was defined either by ultrasound biomicroscopy and/or clinically when an iridoplasty was performed. Images were read by a masked reader using Anterior Chamber Analysis and Interpretation software to identify scleral spur landmarks and calculate anterior chamber, peripheral angle, iris size, iris shape, and lens/pupil size parameters. ASOCT parameters were summarized and compared using the 2-sample t test. Thresholds and area under receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred eyes (66 PB and 34 PIC) of 100 participants were reviewed. Of all ASOCT parameters, iris length in each quadrant, pupil arc, lens/pupil parameters (pupil arc, lens vault, and pupil diameter), all pupillary margin-center point-scleral spur landmark (PM-C-SSL) parameters, and all except superior central iris vault parameters were significantly different between PB and PIC. On threshold evaluation, lens/pupil parameters had the greatest area under receiver operating characteristic curve values (0.77 to 0.80), followed by PM-C-SSL angles (0.71 to 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

We propose that the pupil size parameters and PM-C-SSL angle are the most reliable novel ASOCT parameters to distinguish between PB and PIC eyes. These parameters do not rely on the visibility of the posterior iris surface, which is difficult to identify with ASOCT, but may be ambient lighting dependent.

Comparing the Effect of Lens Extraction With Endocycloplasty to Lens Extraction Alone in Eyes With Plateau Iris Configuration: Pilot Study

PRECIS

Lens extraction with endocycloplasty (LE/ECPL) results in greater angle deepening than LE alone in plateau iris eyes. This study directly compares an LE/ECPL treatment group with a control group.

PURPOSE

Quantitatively determine the effect of LE/ECPL versus LE alone for eyes with plateau iris configuration/plateau iris syndrome (PIC/PIS) on angle parameters.

METHODS

Patients with PIC/PIS who underwent LE/ECPL or LE alone were reviewed. Eyes with ultrasound biomicroscopy-documented PIC that underwent anterior segment optical coherence tomography examination before and after treatment were included. Angle parameters, angle opening distance (AOD), trabecular-iris space area (TISA), and trabecular-iris circumference volume (TICV) were calculated. Angle parameters were compared between treatments using a 2-sample t test. P-values were adjusted by the false discovery rate method (P*). A paired t test was used to compare treated (nasal) and untreated (temporal) angles in LE/ECPL-treated eyes.

RESULTS

Twenty-three eyes of 14 participants were included. Ten eyes (43%) eyes of 7 participants were treated with LE/ECPL, and 13 eyes (57%) of 7 participants were treated with LE alone. Angles were deepened in both groups (P<0.001). Changes in AOD, TISA, and TICV showed that the magnitude of deepening in treated (nasal) quadrants was greater in LE/ECPL eyes than in LE alone eyes (P<0.05). ECPL-treated angles deepened more than the untreated angles by AOD, TISA, and TICV (P<0.002).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that LE/ECPL is more effective than LE alone in opening the anterior chamber angle and that ECPL deepens treated angles more than untreated angles. This study directly compares an LE/ECPL treatment group with a control group, LE alone, allowing for separation of the effect of ECPL from LE.

Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment Techniques: A Review

Assessment of the anterior chamber angle (ACA) is an essential part of the ophthalmological examination. It is intrinsically related to the diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma and has a role in its prevention. Although slit-lamp gonioscopy is considered the gold-standard technique for ACA evaluation, its poor reproducibility and the long learning curve are well-known shortcomings. Several new imaging techniques for angle evaluation have been developed in the recent years. However, whether these instruments may replace or not gonioscopy in everyday clinical practice remains unclear. This review summarizes the last findings in ACA evaluation, focusing on new instruments and their application to the clinical practice. Special attention will be given to the comparison between these new techniques and traditional slit-lamp gonioscopy. Whereas ultrasound biomicroscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography provide quantitative measurements of the anterior segment’s structures, new gonio-photographic systems allow for a qualitative assessment of angle findings, similarly to gonioscopy. Recently developed deep learning algorithms provide an automated classification of angle images, aiding physicians in taking faster and more efficient decisions. Despite new imaging techniques made analysis of the ACA more objective and practical, the ideal method for ACA evaluation has still to be determined.

Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography: Is There a Clinical Role in the Management of Primary Angle Closure Disease?

Primary angle closure disease (PACD) covers a spectrum that includes primary angle closure suspect, primary angle closure, primary angle closure glaucoma, and acute primary angle closure. Accumulating evidence suggests that the pathogenesis of PACD is complex, with multiple contributory factors including variations in the anatomic or biometric characteristics of the angle segment structures. Advances in anterior segment optical coherence tomography technology have further enhanced our understanding of the risk factors and mechanisms involved in the disease process. This review discusses the potential clinical role of the anterior segment optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis, mechanistic evaluation, and as a predictor for future clinical outcomes of patients with PACD.

Assessment of angle closure spectrum disease as a continuum of change using gonioscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography

PURPOSE

Studies examining the anterior chamber angle and angle closure disease often compare quantitative angle information obtained using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) with one of several ordinal scales derived using gonioscopy. We test the assumption that the ordinal gonioscopic angle grades have equal step sizes and can be analysed using metric statistics.

METHODS

The medical records of 214 consecutive patients who were referred for assessment of the anterior chamber angle were prospectively examined using gonioscopy and ASOCT (Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography, OCT, www.heidelbergengineering.com). Anterior chamber angle parameters (angle opening distance, AOD, and trabecular-iris space area, TISA at 500 and 750 microns) were extracted from ASOCT images using a semi-automated segmentation algorithm written on MATLAB (www.mathworks.com). We first matched the quantitative values for each gonioscopic grade (0-4, from no structures visible to ciliary body visible) and described the frequency distributions to determine separability. We then applied a grade-agnostic clustering algorithm to determine the concordance between algorithm-clustered groups (using solely quantitative data) and those obtained using gonioscopy.

RESULTS

The frequency distributions of the quantitative ASOCT parameters for each angle grade were mostly non-parametric and displayed unique distribution characteristics, with a floor effect seen for grade 0 and the lack of a ceiling effect seen for grades 3 and 4. Although we found significant differences in quantitative values across the five angle grades using the frequency distributions, some pairwise comparisons were indistinguishable (such as grades 0 and 1, and grades 3 and 4) due to the overlaps in distributions. On average, differences in quantitative values were consistent between gonioscopic grade steps, but there remained substantial variability that confounds prediction of change between ordinal steps. The clustering algorithm showed approximately 10% of cases with the same group assignment as that of the gonioscopic grade, improving slightly to 30% when the top 5% of quantitative data were excluded from analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not necessarily support the assumption that the ordinal scales used in gonioscopy can be interpreted using an interval scale. We highlight the need for better methods of describing the course and risk of angle closure spectrum disease to identify disease progression and conversion, where gonioscopy remains the gold standard.

Non-contact tests for identifying people at risk of primary angle closure glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) accounts for 50% of glaucoma blindness worldwide. More than three-quarters of individuals with PACG reside in Asia. In these populations, PACG often develops insidiously leading to chronically raised intraocular pressure and optic nerve damage, which is often asymptomatic. Non-contact tests to identify people at risk of angle closure are relatively quick and can be carried out by appropriately trained healthcare professionals or technicians as a triage test. If the test is positive, the person will be referred for further specialist assessment.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-contact tests (limbal anterior chamber depth (LACD) (van Herick test); oblique flashlight test; scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser (SPAC), Scheimpflug photography; anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), for identifying people with an occludable angle.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following bibliographic databases 3 October 2019: CENTRAL; MEDLINE; Embase; BIOSIS; OpenGrey; ARIF and clinical trials registries. The searches were limited to remove case reports. There were no date or language restrictions in the searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included prospective and retrospective cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies conducted in any setting that evaluated the accuracy of one or more index tests for identifying people with an occludable angle compared to a gonioscopic reference standard.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment using QUADAS2 for each study. For each test, 2 x 2 tables were constructed and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. When four or more studies provided data at fixed thresholds for each test, we fitted a bivariate model using the METADAS macro in SAS to calculate pooled point estimates for sensitivity and specificity. For comparisons between index tests and subgroups, we performed a likelihood ratio test comparing the model with and without the covariate.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 47 studies involving 26,151 participants and analysing data from 23,440. Most studies were conducted in Asia (36, 76.6%). Twenty-seven studies assessed AS-OCT (analysing 15,580 participants), 17 studies LACD (7385 participants), nine studies Scheimpflug photography (1616 participants), six studies SPAC (5239 participants) and five studies evaluated the oblique flashlight test (998 participants). Regarding study quality, 36 of the included studies (76.6%) were judged to have a high risk of bias in at least one domain.The use of a case-control design (13 studies) or inappropriate exclusions (6 studies) raised patient selection concerns in 40.4% of studies and concerns in the index test domain in 59.6% of studies were due to lack of masking or post-hoc determination of optimal thresholds. Among studies that did not use a case-control design, 16 studies (20,599 participants) were conducted in a primary care/community setting and 18 studies (2590 participants) in secondary care settings, of which 15 investigated LACD. Summary estimates were calculated for commonly reported parameters and thresholds for each test; LACD ≤ 25% (16 studies, 7540 eyes): sensitivity 0.83 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74, 0.90), specificity 0.88 (95% CI 0.84, 0.92) (moderate-certainty); flashlight (grade1) (5 studies, 1188 eyes): sensitivity 0.51 (95% CI 0.25, 0.76), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.70, 0.98) (low-certainty); SPAC (≤ 5 and/or S or P) (4 studies, 4677 eyes): sensitivity 0.83 (95% CI 0.70, 0.91), specificity 0.78 (95% CI 0.70, 0.83) (moderate-certainty); Scheimpflug photography (central ACD) (9 studies, 1698 eyes): sensitivity 0.92 (95% CI 0.84, 0.96), specificity 0.86 (95% CI 0.76, 0.93) (moderate-certainty); AS-OCT (subjective opinion of occludability) (13 studies, 9242 eyes): sensitivity 0.85 (95% CI 0.76, 0.91); specificity 0.71 (95% CI 0.62, 0.78) (moderate-certainty). For comparisons of sensitivity and specificity between index tests we used LACD (≤ 25%) as the reference category. The flashlight test (grade 1 threshold) showed a statistically significant lower sensitivity than LACD (≤ 25%), whereas AS-OCT (subjective judgement) had a statistically significant lower specificity. There were no statistically significant differences for the other index test comparisons. A subgroup analysis was conducted for LACD (≤ 25%), comparing community (7 studies, 14.4% prevalence) vs secondary care (7 studies, 42% prevalence) settings. We found no evidence of a statistically significant difference in test performance according to setting. Performing LACD on 1000 people at risk of angle closure with a prevalence of occludable angles of 10%, LACD would miss about 17 cases out of the 100 with occludable angles and incorrectly classify 108 out of 900 without angle closure.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The finding that LACD performed as well as index tests that use sophisticated imaging technologies, confirms the potential for this test for case-detection of occludable angles in high-risk populations. However, methodological issues across studies may have led to our estimates of test accuracy being higher than would be expected in standard clinical practice. There is still a need for high-quality studies to evaluate the performance of non-invasive tests for angle assessment in both community-based and secondary care settings.

Volumetric parameters-based differentiation of narrow angle from open angle and classification of angle configurations: an SS-OCT study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the diagnostic ability of volumetric parameters to differentiate narrow angle from open angle and distinguish different configurations of narrow angle.

METHODS

The current study was composed of two parts. In the first part, with gonioscopy as reference standard, we tested power of each parameter to differentiate narrow angle from open angle. In the second part, we evaluated the efficacy of different parameters to distinguish angle configurations which were subclassified into type 1 (pupillary block) and type 2 (non-pupillary block and multiple mechanisms) based on ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) images.

RESULTS

In part 1, the training set was composed of 117 narrow-angle eyes and 60 open-angle eyes, and the validation set included 38 narrow-angle eyes and 37 open-angle eyes. Anterior chamber volume (ACV) outperformed all the other parameters with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.988. The sensitivity and specificity of the cut-off value 98.1 mm³ in the validation set were 90.0% and 97.1%, respectively. In part 2, training set was composed of 96 eyes of 88 patients with primary angle-closure disease, with 49 diagnosed as type 1 and 47 as type 2 configuration. 32 eyes were used for validation. A model comprised of iris volume (IV), iris thickness (IT) 2000 µm from the scleral spur and angle open distance (AOD) 750 µm from the scleral spur was found to have an AUC of 0.793 (95% CI, 0.695 to 0.870). Sensitivity and specificity of the model were 82.6% and 77.8% respectively in the validation set.

CONCLUSIONS

With ACV, we can detect patients with narrow angle from open angle faster and more easily than AOD and anterior chamber depth. Then, for patients with narrow angle, the combination of IV, IT and AOD750 measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography could further classify configurations of angle closure compared with UBM.

Assessment of Circumferential Angle Closure with Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography: a Community Based Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT, CASIA SS-1000; Tomey Corporation, Nagoya, Japan) for angle closure detection, in comparison with gonioscopy, in a community setting.

DESIGN

Reliability analysis.

METHODS

A total of 2027 phakic subjects aged ≥50 years, with no previous history of glaucoma, laser (including peripheral iridotomy), intraocular surgery, or ocular trauma, were consecutively recruited from a community polyclinic in Singapore. Gonioscopy was performed by a single trained ophthalmologist. SS-OCT angle scans, which obtain radial scans for the entire circumference of the angle, were analyzed by a single examiner, masked to the subject's clinical details. On SS-OCT images, angle closure was defined as contact between the iris and any part of the angle wall anterior to the scleral spur. Different cutoff values of the degree of circumferential angle closure (≥35%, ≥50%, and ≥75%) were taken for analysis to assess SS-OCT performance in detecting angle closure.

RESULTS

A total of 1857 subjects (91.6%) were included in the final analysis after excluding poor-quality SS-OCT scans. Almost 90% of the subjects were Chinese, with a mean age of 61.8 ± 6.7 years, and more than half were women (63.5%). The overall AUC of SS-OCT manual grading against gonioscopy was 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.88). The prevalence of angle closure on SS-OCT was 26.1% for the ≥35% definition, with an area under the curve of 0.80 (0.77-0.84), sensitivity of 82.5% (75.3%-88.4%), and specificity of 78.5% (76.5%-80.4%). The first-order agreement coefficient statistics for the 2-quadrant gonioscopic definition of angle-closure with corresponding ≥35%, ≥50%, and ≥75% angle closure definitions for SS-OCT were good at 0.89 (0.83-0.93), 0.88 (0.842-0.93), and 0.88 (0.831-0.99), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large community-based study, SS-OCT exhibited moderate performance for angle closure detection compared to gonioscopy as the reference standard.

Contemporary approach to the diagnosis and management of primary angle-closure disease

The primary angle-closure disease spectrum varies from a narrow angle to advanced glaucoma. A variety of imaging technologies may assist the clinician in determining the pathophysiology and diagnosis of primary angle closure, but gonioscopy remains a mainstay of clinical evaluation. Laser iridotomy effectively eliminates the pupillary block component of angle closure; however, studies show that, in many patients, the iridocorneal angle remains narrow from underlying anatomic issues, and increasing lens size often leads to further narrowing over time. Recent studies have further characterized the role of the lens in angle-closure disease, and cataract or clear lens extraction is increasingly used earlier in its management. As a first surgical step in angle-closure glaucoma, lens extraction alone often effectively controls the pressure with less risk of complications than concurrent or stand-alone glaucoma surgery, but may not be sufficient in more advanced or severe disease. We provide a comprehensive review on the primary angle-closure disease nomenclature, imaging, and current laser and surgical management.

Anterior Segment Imaging for Angle Closure

PURPOSE

To summarize the role of anterior segment imaging (AS-imaging) in angle closure diagnosis and management, and the possible advantages over the current standard of gonioscopy.

DESIGN

Literature review and perspective.

METHODS

Review of the pertinent publications with interpretation and perspective in relation to the use of AS-imaging in angle closure assessment focusing on anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy.

RESULTS

Several limitations have been encountered with the reference standard of gonioscopy for angle assessment. AS-imaging has been shown to have performance in angle closure detection compared to gonioscopy. Also, imaging has greater reproducibility and serves as better documentation for long-term follow-up than conventional gonioscopy. The qualitative and quantitative information obtained from AS-imaging enables better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of angle closure and provides useful parameters for risk assessment and possible prediction of the response to laser and surgical intervention. The latest technologies-including 3-dimensional imaging-have allowed for the assessment of the angle that simulates the gonioscopic view. These advantages suggest that AS-imaging has a potential to be a reference standard for the diagnosis and monitoring of angle closure disease in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Although gonioscopy remains the primary method of angle assessment, AS-imaging has an increasing role in angle closure screening and management. The test should be integrated into clinical practice as an adjunctive tool for angle assessment. It is arguable that AS-imaging should be considered first-line screening for patients at risk for angle closure.

Comparing Laser Peripheral Iridotomy to Cataract Extraction in Narrow Angle Eyes Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography

Purpose

To evaluate the changes in anterior chamber angle (ACA) parameters in primary angle closure (PAC) spectrum eyes before and after cataract extraction (CE) and compare to the changes after laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT).

Methods

Twenty-eight PAC spectrum eyes of 18 participants who underwent CE and 34 PAC spectrum eyes of 21 participants who underwent LPI were included. ASOCT images with 3-dimensional mode angle analysis scans were taken with the CASIA SS-1000 (Tomey Corp., Nagoya, Japan) before and after CE or LPI. Mixed-effect model analysis was used to 1) compare best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and ACA parameters before and after CE; 2) identify and estimate the effects of potential contributing factors affecting changes in ACA parameters; and 3) compare CE and LPI treatment groups.

Results

The increase in average angle parameters (TISA750 and TICV750) was significantly greater after CE than LPI. TICV750 increased by 102% (2.114 [±1.203] μL) after LPI and by 174% (4.546 [± 1.582] μL) after CE (P < 0.001). Change of TICV750 in the CE group was significantly affected by age (P = 0.002), race (P = 0.006), and intraocular lens power (P = 0.037).

Conclusions

CE results in greater anatomic changes in the ACA than LPI in PAC spectrum eyes. ASOCT may be used to follow anatomic changes in the angle after intervention.