Prospective randomized controlled trial of fetal fibronectin on preterm labor management in a tertiary care center

Using Fetal Fibronectin Test to Reduce Hospital Admissions with Diagnosis of Preterm Labor: An Economic Evaluation Study

Background: Preterm labor and delivery remain a major problem in obstetrics accounting for perinatal morbidity and mortality. The challenge is to identify those with true preterm labor to avoid unnecessary hospital admissions. The fetal fibronectin (FFN) test is a strong predictor of preterm birth and can help identify women with true preterm labor. However, its cost-effectiveness as a strategy for triaging women with threatened preterm labor is still debatable. Objective: To evaluate the effect of FFN test implementation on hospital resources by reducing the admission rate of threatened preterm labor in a tertiary hospital, Latifa Hospital, UAE. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation who attended Latifa Hospital in the period of September 2015-December 2016, complaining of threatened preterm labor after the availability of an FFN test, and a historical cohort study for those who attended with threatened preterm labor before the availability of an FFN test. Data analysis was performed using a Kruskal-Wallis test, Kaplan-Meier, Fischer exact chi-square and cost analysis. The significance was set at p-value < 0.05. Results: In total, 840 women met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. The relative risk of FFN for delivery at term was 4.35 times higher among the negative-tested compared to preterm delivery (p-value < 0.001). A total of 134 (15.9%) women were unnecessarily admitted (FFN tested negative, delivered at term) which yielded $107,000 in extra costs. After the introduction of an FFN test, a 7% reduction of threatened preterm labor admissions was recorded.

The utility of fetal fibronectin in asymptomatic singleton and twin pregnancies with a cervical length ≤ 10 mm

Objective: To examine the utility of fetal fibronectin (fFN) for predicting spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) in asymptomatic women with a cervical length (CL) ≤10 mm compared to those with a CL 11-25 mm.Methods: Data was collected on all women with nonanomalous singleton and twin gestations who underwent transvaginal CL at a single institution between 2009 and 2012. Women with an incidental short cervix (CL ≤ 25 mm) between 22 and 32 weeks who had an fFN result within 7 days thereafter were included. Indicated preterm deliveries at <14 days of fFN, women who underwent cerclage placement, and terminations of pregnancy were excluded. The primary outcome was spontaneous PTB within 7 and 14 days of the fFN. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of fFN for a CL ≤ 10 mm was calculated for singletons and twins and compared to those with a CL 11-25 mm.Results: Of the 213 women included, 117 (54.9%) were singletons and 96 (45%) were twins. Baseline characteristics were similar between those with a CL ≤ 10 mm and with a CL 11-25 mm in both singletons and twins. The NPV of fFN for delivery within 7 days in singletons and twins with a CL ≤ 10 mm was 100%, similar to those with a CL 11-25 mm (93-100%). The NPV of fFN for delivery within 14 days in singletons and twins with a CL ≤ 10 mm remained high (87.5-100%) when compared to those with a CL 11-25 mm (93-100%). The PPV of fFN for delivery within 7 and 14 days in both singletons and twins with a CL ≤ 10 mm was low (10-25%) and similar to those with a CL 11-25 mm (7.1-24.4%).Conclusions: The NPV of fFN in asymptomatic singleton and twin pregnancies with a CL ≤ 10 mm is high and comparable to the NPV of fFN in women with a longer CL. Routine fFN collection in this select population should be considered as it may avoid unnecessary and costly admissions, as well as assist with timing of antenatal corticosteroids.

Compliance with Fetal Fibronectin Testing at a Canadian Tertiary Care Perinatal Centre

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess compliance with fetal fibronectin (fFN) testing recommendations at a single tertiary care perinatal centre. The secondary objective was to identify factors associated with compliance with these recommendations.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 of all patients who presented to the IWK Health Centre with suspected preterm labour. Inclusion criteria included symptoms of preterm labour prior to 37⁰ weeks gestation, singleton or multiple pregnancy, and established fetal wellbeing. Exclusion criteria included severe fetal anomaly, contraindications to tocolysis, transfer from community hospital, or inadequate documentation. Provider compliance was evaluated to determine: 1) whether the test was performed for appropriate indications according to provincial fFN guidelines; 2) whether fFN results were appropriately being used to inform patient care. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with compliance.

RESULTS

A total of 528 patients presented with symptoms of preterm labour. The overall compliance with testing recommendations was 76.1%. Compliance for patients who met criteria for fFN testing was 73%, and compliance for those not meeting criteria was 76.4%. Of patients with a negative fFN result, 85.3% were appropriately discharged home without intervention. Gestational age, time of day, and non-obstetrician provider type were found to be associated with compliance.

CONCLUSION

Despite regional and national guidelines, this study demonstrates a compliance rate of 76% in our centre, indicating a gap in provider knowledge regarding proper use and interpretation of fFN. Non-obstetrician provider type was associated with decreased compliance.

Fetal fibronectin testing for reducing the risk of preterm birth

BACKGROUND

Fetal fibronectin (FFN) is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein localized at the maternal-fetal interface of the amniotic membranes, between chorion and decidua, where it is concentrated in this area between decidua and trophoblast. In normal conditions, FFN is found at very low levels in cervicovaginal secretions. Levels greater than or equal to 50 ng/mL at or after 22 weeks have been associated with an increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth. In fact, FFN is one of the best predictors of preterm birth in all populations studied so far, and can help in selecting which women are at significant risk for preterm birth. This is an update of a review first published in 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of management based on knowledge of FFN testing results for preventing preterm birth.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (7 September 2018), ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (7 September 2018), and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials of pregnant women screened with FFN for risk of preterm birth. Studies included are based exclusively on knowledge of FFN results versus no such knowledge, and we have excluded studies including women with only positive or only negative FFN results.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data, and checked them for accuracy. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 16 trials, of which six were eligible for inclusion. The six included studies randomized 546 women with singleton gestations and threatened preterm labor (PTL) at 23 0/7 to 34 6/7 weeks. A total of 277 women were randomized to knowledge and 269 to no knowledge of FFN. No trials were identified on asymptomatic women or multiple gestations.The risk of bias of included studies was mixed. For selected important outcomes, preterm birth before 37, 34, and 32 weeks, and maternal hospitalization, we graded the quality of the evidence and created a 'Summary of findings' table. For these outcomes, the evidence was graded as mainly low quality due to the imprecision of effect estimates.Management based on knowledge of FFN results may reduce preterm birth before 37 weeks (21.6%) versus controls without such knowledge (29.2%) (risk ratio (RR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52 to 1.01; 4 trials; 357 women; low-quality evidence). However, management based on knowledge of FFN results may make little or no difference to preterm birth before 34 (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.18; 4 trials; 357 women; low-quality evidence) or maternal hospitalization (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.43; 5 trials; 441 women; low-quality evidence). The evidence for preterm birth before 32 weeks is uncertain because the quality was found to be very low (average RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.16 to 3.96; 4 trials; 357 women; very low-quality evidence).For all other outcomes, for which there were available data (preterm birth less than 28 weeks; gestational age at delivery (weeks); birthweight less than 2500 g; perinatal death; tocolysis; steroids for fetal lung maturity; time to evaluate; respiratory distress syndrome; neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission; and NICU days), knowledge of FFN results may make little or no difference to the outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence from this review suggests that management based on knowledge of FFN results may reduce preterm birth before 37 weeks. However, our confidence in this result is limited as the evidence was found to be of low quality. Effects on other substantive outcomes are uncertain due to serious concerns in study design, inconsistency, and imprecision of effect estimates. No trials were identified on asymptomatic women, or multiple gestations.Future studies are needed that include specific populations (e.g. singleton gestations with symptoms of preterm labor), a study group managed with a protocol based on the FFN results, and that report not only maternal but also important perinatal outcomes. Cost-effectiveness analyses are also needed.

A high concentration of fetal fibronectin in cervical secretions increases the risk of intra-amniotic infection and inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes

Objective To determine whether the risk of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and spontaneous preterm delivery (SPTD) varies as a function of the concentration of cervical fetal fibronectin (fFN) in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Methods This prospective study included 180 patients with preterm labor and intact membranes who had a sample collected for quantitative fFN measurement and underwent amniocentesis. Amniotic fluid was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and genital mycoplasmas. Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 concentration >23 ng/mL. Results (1) The prevalence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and SPTD within 7 days was 32.2% (58/180) and 33.9% (61/178), respectively; (2) The higher the fFN concentration, the greater the risk of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and SPTD within 7 days (P<0.001, respectively); (3) An fFN concentration 150 ng/mL had a better diagnostic performance than an fFN 50 ng/mL in the identification of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and SPTD within 7 days; (4) Among the patients with an fFN <50 ng/mL, intra-amniotic infection/inflammation was identified in 7.6% (6/79) of patients and 66.7% (4/6) delivered within 7 days. Conclusion The higher the concentration of fFN, the greater the risk of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and SPTD in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes.

Threatened preterm birth: Validation of a nomogram to predict the individual risk of very preterm delivery in a secondary care center

INTRODUCTION

Very preterm delivery (22-32 weeks of gestation) remains a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to validate a statistical model allowing to predict the risk of preterm delivery to use as a clinical decision-making tool for in utero transfer from a secondary to a tertiary care center.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study in a secondary care center (approximately 2500 births) in Paris, France. 137 women were admitted for threatened preterm delivery between 22 and 32 weeks. Women were retrospectively allocated to the following groups based on medical decision: "transfer group" (in utero transfer to a tertiary care unit) and "no transfer group" (no in utero transfer). The risk of preterm delivery within 48 h and before 32 weeks gestation was assessed for each group using a nomogram previously validated in a tertiary care center. The primary objective of the study was to determine the accuracy of the prediction model.

RESULTS

The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were excellent (preterm delivery risk within 48 h, ROC AUC: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.95-1.00; probability of preterm delivery before 32 weeks gestation, ROC AUC: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89-0.99). A threshold set at 0.16 helped minimize the risk of unnecessary in utero transfers with an excellent negative predictive value of 0.99.

CONCLUSIONS

We validated nomograms to predict the individual probability of preterm birth after admission in a secondary care center. Those nomograms could be helpful when making decisions regarding an in utero transfer to a tertiary care unit.

Prediction of preterm delivery in symptomatic women using PAMG-1, fetal fibronectin and phIGFBP-1 tests: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of placental alpha microglobulin-1 (PAMG-1), fetal fibronectin (fFN) and phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (phIGFBP-1) tests in predicting spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) within 7 days of testing in women with symptoms of preterm labor, through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. The test performance of each biomarker was also assessed according to pretest probability of sPTB ≤ 7 days.

METHODS

The Cochrane, MEDLINE, PubMed and ResearchGate bibliographic databases were searched from inception until October 2017. Cohort studies that reported on the predictive accuracy of PAMG-1, fFN and phIGFBP-1 for the prediction of sPTB within 7 days of testing in women with symptoms of preterm labor were included. Summary receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios were generated using indirect methods for the calculation of pooled effect sizes with a bivariate linear mixed model for the logit of sensitivity and specificity, with each diagnostic test as a covariate, as described by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.

RESULTS

Bivariate mixed model pooled sensitivity of PAMG-1, fFN and phIGFBP-1 for the prediction of sPTB ≤ 7 days was 76% (95% CI, 57-89%), 58% (95% CI, 47-68%) and 93% (95% CI, 88-96%), respectively; pooled specificity was 97% (95% CI, 95-98%), 84% (95% CI, 81-87%) and 76% (95% CI, 70-80%) respectively; pooled PPV was 76.3% (95% CI, 69-84%) (P < 0.05), 34.1% (95% CI, 29-39%) and 35.2% (95% CI, 31-40%), respectively; pooled NPV was 96.6% (95% CI, 94-99%), 93.3% (95% CI, 92-95%) and 98.7% (95% CI, 98-99%), respectively; pooled LR+ was 22.51 (95% CI, 15.09-33.60) (P < 0.05), 3.63 (95% CI, 2.93-4.50) and 3.80 (95% CI, 3.11-4.66), respectively; and pooled LR- was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.12-0.48) (P < 0.05), 0.50 (95% CI, 0.39-0.64) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05-0.16), respectively. The areas under the ROC curves for PAMG-1, fFN and phIGFBP-1 for sPTB ≤ 7 days were 0.961, 0.874 and 0.801, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the prediction of sPTB within 7 days of testing in women with signs and symptoms of preterm labor, the PPV of PAMG-1 was significantly higher than that of phIGFBP-1 or fFN. Other diagnostic accuracy measures did not differ between the three biomarker tests. As prevalence affects the predictive performance of a diagnostic test, use of a highly specific assay for a lower-prevalence syndrome such as sPTB may optimize management. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

The fetal fibronectin test: 25 years after its development, what is the evidence regarding its clinical utility? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The identification of women at risk for preterm birth should allow interventions which could improve neonatal outcome. Fetal fibronectin, a glycoprotein which acts normally as glue between decidua and amniotic membranes could be a good marker of impending labour when its concentration in cervicovaginal secretions between 22 and 36 weeks of gestation is ≥50 ng/mL. Many authors worldwide have tested this marker with many different methodologies and clinical settings, but conclusions about its clinical use are mixed. It is time for a comprehensive update through a systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, supplemented by manual search of bibliographies of known primary and review articles, international conference papers, and contact with experts from 1-1990 to 2-2018. We have selected all type of studies involving fetal fibronectin test accuracy for preterm delivery. Two authors independently extracted data about study characteristics and quality from identified publications. Contingency tables were constructed. Reference standards were preterm delivery before 37, 36, 35, 34, and 32 weeks, within 28, 21, 14, or 7 d and within 48 h. Data were pooled to produce summary likelihood ratios for positive and negative tests results.Results: One hundred and ninety-three primary studies were identified allowing analysis of 53 subgroups. In all settings, none of the summary likelihood ratios were >10 or <0.1, thus indicating moderate prediction, particularly in asymptomatic women and in multiple gestations.Conclusions: The fetal fibronectin test should not be used as a screening test for asymptomatic women. For high-risk asymptomatic women, and especially for women with multiple pregnancies, the performance of the fetal fibronectin test was also too low to be clinically relevant. Consensual use as a diagnostic tool for women with suspected preterm labor, the best use policy probably still depends on local contingencies, future cost-effectiveness analysis, and comparison with other more recent available biochemical markers.

Use of fetal fibronectin testing in women transferred for threatened preterm labour in remote far north Queensland

BACKGROUND

Threatened preterm labour is a common reason for medical transfer from remote communities; however, many transferred women do not deliver preterm. A tool for prediction of preterm birth such as fetal fibronectin may reduce transfers and related social and economic costs.

AIM

To review the use of fetal fibronectin testing in women transferred for threatened preterm labour from Cape York to Cairns Hospital between 2011 and 2015 and determine the role testing could play in reducing transfers and associated costs.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Records from the Royal Flying Doctor Service and Cairns Hospital were accessed. Women transferred solely for threatened preterm labour were included in the study. Fetal fibronectin testing, hospital admission, outpatient stays and birth outcome data were collated and analysed. Costs were assigned using the National Hospital Cost Data Collection, round 19.

RESULTS

Forty-seven women were included in the study; however, only 20 underwent fetal fibronectin testing. Transfer of 30 women who had either a negative test or were not tested but delivered at term resulted in 41 inpatient nights and 443 excess outpatient nights, costing an estimated AU$57 408. Aeromedical transfers were estimated to cost a further $151 500.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to clinical guidelines and greater availability and use of fetal fibronectin testing in Cape York have the potential to reduce aeromedical transfers for threatened preterm labour. Substantial inpatient and excess outpatient stays could be avoided with associated reduction in health system and social costs. Strategies to improve adherence to guidelines and increase access to testing are required.

Fetal fibronectin testing for prevention of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies with threatened preterm labor: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE DATA

Fetal fibronectin is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein that is produced by amniocytes and cytotrophoblasts and has been shown to predict spontaneous preterm birth.

STUDY

The aim of this systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials was to evaluate the effect of the use of fetal fibronectin in the prevention of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies with threatened preterm labor.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

The research was conducted with the use of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Sciences, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, OVID, and Cochrane Library as electronic databases from the inception of each database to February 2016. Selection criteria included randomized clinical trials of singleton gestations with threatened preterm labor that were assigned randomly to management based on fetal fibronectin results (ie, intervention group) or not (ie, comparison group). Types of participants included women with singleton gestations at 23 0/7 to 34 6/7 weeks with threatened preterm labor. Studies that included management that was also based on the use of sonographic cervical length were excluded. The primary outcome was preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation. The summary measures were reported as relative risk or as mean differences with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Six trials that included 546 singleton gestations with symptoms of preterm labor were included in the metaanalysis. The overall risk of bias of the included trials was low. Women were eligible for the random assignment in case of symptoms that suggested preterm labor at 23-34 weeks of gestation. During admission, before digital examination, a Dacron swab was rotated in the posterior fornix for 10 seconds to absorb cervicovaginal secretions that were then analyzed for the fetal fibronectin qualitative method, with results reported as either positive or negative. Women who were assigned randomly to the fetal fibronectin group had a similar incidence of preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation (20.7% vs 29.2%; relative risk, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.01), at <34 weeks of gestation (8.3% vs 7.9%; relative risk, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-2.18), at <32 weeks of gestation (3.3% vs 5.6%; relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-1.74), and at <28 weeks of gestation (1.1% vs 1.7%; relative risk, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-3.67) compared with the control group. No differences were found in the number of women who delivered within 7 days (12.8% vs 14.5%; relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-1.21), in the mean of gestational age at delivery (mean difference, 0.20 week; 95% confidence interval, -0.26 to 0.67), in the rate of maternal hospitalization (27.4% vs 26.9%; relative risk, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.44), in the use of tocolysis (25.3% vs 28.2%; relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.24), antenatal steroids (29.2% vs 29.2%; relative risk, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.39), in the mean time in the triage unit (mean difference, 0.60 hour; 95% confidence interval, -0.03 to 1.23) and in neonatal outcomes that included respiratory distress syndrome (1.3% vs 1.5%; relative risk, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-14.06), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (19.4% vs 8.1%; relative risk, 2.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-6.46). Management based on the fetal fibronectin test required higher hospitalization charges (mean difference, $153; 95% confidence interval, 24.01-281.99).

CONCLUSION

Fetal fibronectin testing in singleton gestations with threatened preterm labor is not associated with the prevention of preterm birth or improvement in perinatal outcome but is associated with higher costs.

Biophysical and Biochemical Screening for the Risk of Preterm Labor: An Update

The heterogeneous causes of spontaneous preterm birth make prediction and prevention difficult. Recently developed biochemical and biophysical tests add significantly to clinicians' ability to evaluate and treat women at risk for spontaneous preterm birth. The primary importance of transvaginal cervical sonography and cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin lies in the high negative predictive values of the tests for preterm delivery risk. Cervical length may be useful in identifying women who are candidates for cervical cerclage or progesterone therapy for preterm birth prevention. Together, cervical length and fibronectin can be used in the triaging of women symptomatic for preterm labor.

Prescribing patterns of antenatal corticosteroids in women with threatened preterm labor

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of cervical length (CL) measurement and fetal fibronectin testing (fFN) on the clinicians' decision to prescribe antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) to women with symptoms of preterm labor.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study including women with symptoms of preterm labor and intact membranes between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation. We compared the proportion prescribed and completed ACS courses, preterm delivery within seven days and median intervals from ACS to delivery in four groups: group 1 CL<10 mm, group 2 CL 10-30 mm and positive fFN, group 3 CL 10-30 mm and negative fFN, group 4 CL>30 mm.

RESULTS

ACS were prescribed to 63/65 (97%) women in group 1, 176/192 (91%) in group 2, 111/172 women (65%) in group 3 and 55/242 (23%) in group 4. In group 1, 42 (65%) women delivered within seven days, compared to 34 (18%) in group 2, 6 (3%) in group 3 and 3 (1%) in group 4. Median intervals between ACS and delivery were 6 days (IQR 3-61 days), 44 days (IQR 17-69 days), 53 days (IQR 37-77 days) and 66 days (IQR 43-78 days) in group 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively.

CONCLUSION

ACS were prescribed frequently to women with a CL of 10-30 mm and a negative fFN test or a CL>30 mm. There is room for improvement in the prescription of ACS in these low risk women.

Fetal fibronectin as a biomarker of preterm labor: a review of the literature and advances in its clinical use

Spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) is a challenge in obstetrics today, and is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The ability to predict preterm birth had, until recently, been poor. The biomarker fetal fibronectin (fFN), found at the maternal–fetal interface, when present in high concentrations in cervicovaginal fluid, has been shown to increase the risk of sPTB in symptomatic and asymptomatic women. Recently, further research has been performed into the applicability of such a test to clinical practice, and its effects on management decisions and patient outcomes. Owing to its high negative predictive value, a negative fFN result has been shown to reduce unnecessary interventions, change patient management and reduce healthcare costs, by allowing early reassurance and return to normal care pathways, while care can be concentrated on those at risk. The development of a bedside quantitative fFN test has shown promise to further improve the positive predictive abilities of fFN, as have combined predictive models with cervical length and fFN.

Evaluation of the impact of fetal fibronectin test implementation on hospital admissions for preterm labour in Ontario: a multiple baseline time-series design

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of a health system-wide fetal fibronectin (fFN) testing programme on the rates of hospital admission for preterm labour (PTL).

DESIGN

Multiple baseline time-series design.

SETTING

Canadian province of Ontario.

POPULATION

A retrospective population-based cohort of antepartum and delivered obstetrical admissions in all Ontario hospitals between 1 April 2002 and 31 March 2010.

METHODS

International Classification of Diseases codes in a health system-wide hospital administrative database were used to identify the study population and define the outcome measure. An aggregate time series of monthly rates of hospital admissions for PTL was analysed using segmented regression models after aligning the fFN test implementation date for each institution.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Rate of obstetrical hospital admission for PTL.

RESULTS

Estimated rates of hospital admission for PTL following fFN implementation were lower than predicted had pre-implementation trends prevailed. The reduction in the rate was modest, but statistically significant, when estimated at 12 months following fFN implementation (-0.96 hospital admissions for PTL per 100 preterm births; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.02 to -0.90, P = 0.04). The statistically significant reduction was sustained at 24 and 36 months following implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a robust quasi-experimental study design to overcome confounding as a result of underlying secular trends or concurrent interventions, we found evidence of a small but statistically significant reduction in the health system-level rate of hospital admissions for PTL following implementation of fFN testing in a large Canadian province.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical length measurement and fibronectin testing in women with threatened preterm labor

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of risk stratification with cervical length (CL) measurement and/or fetal fibronectin (fFN) tests in women with threatened preterm labor between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate 7 test-treatment strategies in women with threatened preterm labor from a health care system perspective. Estimates on disease prevalence, costs, and test accuracy were based on medical literature.

RESULTS

We found that additional fFN testing in the case of a CL between 10 and 30 mm is cost saving without compromising neonatal health outcomes, compared with a treat-all strategy or single CL testing. Implementing this strategy could lead to an annual cost saving between €2.8 million and €14.4 million in The Netherlands, a country with about 180,000 deliveries annually.

CONCLUSION

In women with threatened preterm labor between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation, the most cost-effective test strategy uses a combination of CL and fFN testing.

[Prolonged hospitalization versus home management for women with arrested preterm labour: a before-after study]

OBJECTIVES

To compare gestational age at birth and incidence of preterm birth inferior to 37 weeks of gestation (WG) in single pregnancies with either prolonged hospitalization, or early home discharge after arrested preterm labour.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Management of preterm labour was changed in our public academic hospital because no evidence of benefits for prolonged hospitalization was found and because adverse effects related to long-term hospitalization were described. In this retrospective before-after study, we compare the attitude A (December 2006 to April 2008), a prolonged hospitalization until 32 or 34WG, with new attitude B (May 2008 to February 2010), an early discharge home if the cervical exam was unchanged since admission.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients were included: 70 in each group. Initial hospitalization stay was significantly shorter in Group B (respectively, 5.4±5.4 days and 11.4±12.1 days; P<0.05). Preterm spontaneous delivery is 14 (20%) in group A and 21 (28.6%) in Group B (P>0.05). Gestational ages at birth were 33(5/7) and 33(0/7) WG in groups A and B, respectively (P>0.05). If we focus on patients who were discharged home in the two groups (women who did not deliver no matter the hospitalization length), the gestational age at birth (38(4/7) and 38WG; ns) and the prematurity rate inferior to 37WG (17.2% and 22.4%; ns) were statistically similar.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

This study suggests that shorter hospitalization does not decrease the delivery term, nor does it increase the premature delivery incidence.

Fetal Laboratory Medicine: On the Frontier of Maternal–Fetal Medicine

BACKGROUND

Emerging antenatal interventions and care delivery to the fetus require diagnostic support, including laboratory technologies, appropriate methodologies, establishment of special algorithms, and interpretative guidelines for clinical decision-making.

CONTENT

Fetal diagnostic and therapeutic interventions vary in invasiveness and are associated with a spectrum of risks and benefits. Fetal laboratory assessments are well served by miniaturized diagnostic methods for blood analysis. Expedited turnaround times are mandatory to support invasive interventions such as cordocentesis and intrauterine transfusions. Health-associated reference intervals are required for fetal test interpretation. Fetal blood sampling by cordocentesis carries substantial risk and is therefore performed only when fetal health is impaired, or at risk. When the suspected pathology is not confirmed, however, normative fetal data can be collected. Strategies for assurance of sample integrity from cordocenteses and confirmation of fetal origin are described. After birth, definitive assessment of prenatal environmental and/or drug exposures to the fetus can be retrospectively assessed by analysis of meconium, hair, and other alternative matrices. A rapidly advancing technology for fetal assessment is the use of fetal laboratory diagnostic techniques that use cell-free fetal DNA collected from maternal plasma, and genetic analysis based on molecular counting techniques.

SUMMARY

Developmental changes in fetal biochemical and hematologic parameters in health and disease are continually delineated by analysis of our collective outcome-based experience. Noninvasive technologies for fetal evaluation are realizing the promise of lower risk yet robust diagnostics; examples include sampling and analysis of free fetal DNA from maternal blood, and analysis of fetal products accessible at maternal sites. Application of diagnostic technologies for nonmedical purposes (e.g., sex selection) underscores the importance of ethical guidelines for new technology implementation.

Cost-effectiveness of fibronectin testing in a triage in women with threatened preterm labor: alleviation of pregnancy outcome by suspending tocolysis in early labor (APOSTEL-I trial)

Background

At present, women with threatened preterm labor before 32 weeks of gestation are, after transfer to a perinatal center, treated with tocolytics and corticosteroids. Many of these women are treated unnecessarily. Fibronectin is an accurate predictor for the occurrence of preterm birth among women with threatened preterm labor. We will assess whether triage of these women with fibronectin testing, cervical length or their combination is cost-effective.

Methods/Design

We will investigate a prospective cohort of women referred to a perinatal centre for spontaneous threatened preterm labor between 24 and 34 weeks with intact membranes. All women will be tested for fibronectin and cervical length. Women with a cervical length <10 mm and women with a cervical length between 10-30 mm in combination with a positive fibronectin test will be treated with tocolytics according to local protocol. Women with a cervical length between 10-30 mm in combination with a negative fibronectin test will be randomised between treatment with nifedipine (intervention) and placebo (control) for 48 hours. Women with a cervical length > 30 mm will be managed according to local protocol. Corticosteroids may be given to all women at the discretion of the attending physician. Primary outcome measure will be delivery within 7 days. Secondary outcome measures will be neonatal morbidity and mortality, complications of tocolytics, costs and health related quality of life. The analysis will be according to the intention to treat principle. We anticipate the probability on preterm birth within 7 days in the group of women with a negative fibronectine test to be 5%. Two groups of 110 women will be needed to assure that in case of non-inferiority the difference in the proportion of preterm deliveries < 7 days will be within a prespecified boundary of 7.5% (one sided test, β 0.2, α 0.05). Data obtained from women with a positive and negative fibronectin tests in both the cohort study and the trial will be integrated in a cost-effectiveness analysis that will assess economic consequences of the use of fibronectin.

Discussion

This study will provide evidence for the use of fibronectin testing as safe and cost-effective method in a triage for threatened preterm labor.

Trial registration

Nederlands Trial Register (NTR) number 1857, .

Fetal fibronectin testing for reducing the risk of preterm birth

BACKGROUND

Fetal fibronectin (FFN) is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein localized at the maternal-fetal interface of the amniotic membranes, between chorion and decidua, where it is concentrated in this area between decidua and trophoblast. In normal conditions, FFN is found at very low levels in cervico-vaginal secretions. Levels greater than or equal to 50 ng/mL at or after 22 weeks have been associated with an increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth. In fact, FFN is one of the best predictors of preterm birth in all populations studied so far, and can help selecting which women are at significant risk for preterm birth.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of management based on knowledge of FFN testing results for preventing preterm birth.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2007) and all references in identified articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials of pregnant women between the gestational ages of 22 and 34 weeks screened with FFN for risk of preterm birth. Studies included are based exclusively on knowledge of FFN results versus no such knowledge, and we have excluded studies including women with only positive or only negative FFN results.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All four authors assessed studies for inclusion and quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 13 trials, of which five were eligible for inclusion. The five included studies randomized 474 women, of which 235 were randomized to knowledge and 249 to no knowledge of FFN.Preterm birth less than 37 weeks was significantly decreased with management based on knowledge of FFN results (15.6%) versus controls without such knowledge (28.6%; risk ratio 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.87). All other outcomes for which there were available data (preterm birth at less than 34, 32, or 28 weeks; gestational age at delivery; birthweight less than 2500 grams; perinatal death; maternal hospitalization; tocolysis; steroids for fetal lung maturity; and time to evaluate) were similar in the two groups. No other maternal or neonatal outcome was available for meaningful analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although FFN is commonly used in labor and delivery units to help in the management of women with symptoms of preterm labor, currently there is not sufficient evidence to recommend its use. Since this review found an association between knowledge of FFN results and a lower incidence of preterm birth before 37 weeks, further research should be encouraged.

PAPP-A levels as an early marker of idiopathic preterm birth: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate late PAPP-A levels as predictive of preterm birth in symptomatic women.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of singleton gestations, 23 to 34 weeks, and symptoms of preterm labor. PAPP-A, IGF-I and IGF-III analysis were performed. Primary end point was delivery < or =7 days. Accuracy and optimally predictive PAPP-A values were based on receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULT

In all, 26 women (51%) delivered < or =7 days post-admission (Group 1); 25 women (49%) >7 days (Group 2). Group 1 mean PAPP-A=38 000 vs 55 333 for Group 2 (P<0.04). Group 1 mean gestational age at delivery=29 weeks vs 37 weeks for Group 2 (P<0.00014). PAPP-A level < or =30,000 mU l(-1) had highest specificity (88%), sensitivity (50%), and positive predictive (81%) and negative predictive (62%) values for delivery < or =7 days. ROC area under curve=0.703.

CONCLUSION

PAPP-A levels < or =30,000 mU l(-1) at admission was associated with increased risk for preterm birth < or =7 days, supporting active management and therapeutic approach in these women.

Does knowledge of cervical length and fetal fibronectin affect management of women with threatened preterm labor? A randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of sonographic cervical length (CL) and fetal fibronectin (FFN) on length of evaluation and outcomes in women with preterm labor (PTL).

STUDY DESIGN

Women with threatened PTL were randomized to either a knowledge group (results of CL and FFN available and used according to study protocol), or a standard group (blinded to CL and FFN). Primary outcome was length of evaluation in triage.

RESULTS

One hundred women were randomized. There was no significant difference between groups in length of evaluation, but in women with CL > or = 30 mm, the mean time for evaluation was significantly shorter in the knowledge group (1:58 h +/- 0:50 vs 2:53 h +/- 0:50, P = .004). Incidence of spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) in the knowledge group was significantly reduced (13.0 vs 36.2%, P = .01).

CONCLUSION

The knowledge of CL and FFN was associated with reduction in length of evaluation in women with CL > or = 30 mm and in incidence of SPTB in all women with PTL.

Performance of cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin in a community hospital setting

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of vaginal fetal fibronectin (FFN) as a screening test for preterm delivery in a community hospital.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort of patients at high risk for preterm delivery at a community hospital underwent testing with FFN over a 15 month-period (March 2004-May 2005). Indications for testing were preterm labor, multiple pregnancies, cervical shortening, and cerclage. Pregnancy characteristics were retrieved on all women with positive FFN results and controls in a 1:2 ratio. Outcome variables included interval to delivery; length of hospital stay; and rates of preterm delivery <37 weeks. In the presence of serial FFN testing, only the initial result was used for calculation of diagnostic indices. Statistical analysis utilized t-test, Fisher's exact test and logistic regression analysis to control for gestational age at testing, with P < 0.05 or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) not inclusive of the unity considered significant.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty seven FFN tests were performed in 230 women, of which 33 (14.3%) had positive FFN results. Duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter for patients with negative than positive results (8 h vs. 2.1 days, P = 0.011). Women with positive FFN were more likely to deliver within 14 days (OR = 6.5, 95% CI 1.4; 30.7), within 21 days (OR = 4.8; 95% CI 1.4; 16.6), before 34 weeks (OR = 5.0, 95% CI 1.7; 14.8) and before 37 weeks (OR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.3; 7.1) than women with negative results.

CONCLUSION

A negative FFN result provides enough reassurance to allow shorter hospital stay. In a real-world setting (a community hospital with a population heterogeneous for risk factors for preterm delivery, and in a non-protocol setting) the performance of FFN testing closely mirrors that obtained in academic institutions, where the test was studied in more uniform populations under strict protocols. The performance of vaginal fibronectin in patients with heterogeneous risk factors for preterm delivery closely mirrors that obtained in studies conducted in populations with homogeneous risk factors.

The impact of fetal fibronectin testing for women with symptoms of preterm labour in routine clinical practice within a New Zealand population

AIMS

To perform a comparative analysis of antenatal management received according to the results of cervico-vaginal fetal fibronectin (fFN) testing, and to review preterm delivery rates and fFN predictive values within a New Zealand population of women presenting with threatened preterm labour.

METHODS

Case note review of all fFN tests performed at Middlemore Hospital, South Auckland from August 2003 to March 2005 (n = 199). Data collected included risk factors for preterm delivery, signs and symptoms at presentation, antenatal management received after fFN test and outcome and delivery details. Positive and negative fFN results were compared.

RESULTS

Women with a positive fFN were more likely to receive antenatal corticosteroids (96.4 vs 4.7% RR 8.74 (95% CI 5.40-14.17)) and tocolysis (71.4 vs 2.4% RR 8.10 (95% CI 4.49-14.59)) and to be admitted antenatally (96.4 vs 54.4% RR 1.77 (95% CI 1.50-2.10)) with a higher mean cost of treatment (967.47 NZ dollars vs 335.27 NZ dollars P < 0.05). Rates of delivery < 34 weeks were higher in those with a positive fFN (41.9 vs 0.7% RR 62.06 (95% CI 8.43-457.14)).

CONCLUSION

Women with a positive fFN result received different treatment to those with a negative fFN. Use of fFN test in routine clinical practice allows management and resources to be targeted more appropriately and may limit unnecessary interventions.

The Evaluation of the Fetal Fibronectin Test for Prediction of Preterm Delivery in Symptomatic Patients

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of testing for fetal fibronectin (fFN) to rule out the diagnosis of preterm labour in symptomatic patients in a Canadian setting.

METHODS

This was a prospective, blinded clinical evaluation of fFN testing in women presenting with threatened preterm labour at between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation at two Canadian tertiary care centres.

RESULTS

Of the 149 women tested, 32 had a positive fFN test. In the total patient population, 10.1% delivered within seven days of testing, and 18.2% delivered prior to 34 weeks. A negative fFN result was associated with a 97.4% likelihood of delivering more than seven days after testing and with a 91.4% chance of delivering after 34 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The fFN test appears to provide useful information in the risk assessment of Canadian women presenting with symptoms compatible with preterm labour. A negative test has a high predictive value for delivering more than seven days after presentation.

Vaginal radical trachelectomy: A valuable fertility-preserving option in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. A series of 50 pregnancies and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To report the obstetrical results following vaginal radical trachelectomy (VRT), a fertility-preserving surgery in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

Retrospective review of our first 72 patients treated by a laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by a VRT from October 1991 to October 2003 with regards to their reproductive function.

RESULTS

Patients' median age was 32 years old (21-42) and 53 (74%) were nulligravida. A total of 50 pregnancies occurred in 31 women. The majority (66%) had only one pregnancy, 19% had 2 pregnancies and 16% had 3 pregnancies or more. The rate of first trimester miscarriage was 16%, the rate of second trimester miscarriage was (4%) and 2 women (4%) elected to have pregnancy termination. A total of 36 pregnancies (72%) reached the third trimester. Of those, 3 (8%) ended prematurely at <32 weeks gestation, 5 (14%) delivered between 32 and 36 weeks and 28 (78%) delivered at term (>37 weeks). One newborn died of neonatal sepsis from E. coli infection and one died from cardiac malformation (trisomy-18). Seven patients (10%) had infertility problems: 3 from ovulatory causes of which 2 successfully conceived with IVF, one from endometriosis and low sperm count and 3 from probable cervical cause of which one conceived with IUI. One patient had a twin pregnancy following IVF and elected to have embryo reduction and subsequently delivered at 37 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Based on our experience, the obstetrical results following VRT for early-stage cervical cancer are very encouraging. The majority of women can anticipate to conceive spontaneously and deliver near term.

Assessment of the impact of introducing fetal fibronectin assay in the management of preterm labour at Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand

Elevated levels of fetal fibronectin (fFN) in cervicovaginal secretions beyond 20-22 weeks of gestation are used as a predictor of preterm birth in patients with corroborative symptoms and signs.

AIM

To assess the impact of introducing the fFN assay on the diagnosis, length of hospital stay and cost of managing patients presenting with symptoms of premature labour in our hospital.

METHODS

The first 30 fFN-tested patients (fFN group) were prospectively recruited and followed up until delivery. Hospital stay and management costs (costs of individual tests and treatment administered) and neonatal outcomes were compared with 30 matching historical controls.

RESULTS

Overall management costs of the fFN-group were comparable with controls (NZ dollar 918 versus NZ dollar 943 per patient, p = 0.44). The fFN-group had a trend towards reduced length of hospital stay (p = 0.082), less tocolysis (p = 0.002) and use of steroids (p < 0.001). The cost of managing an fFN-positive patient was more than an fFN-negative patient, but not statistically significant (NZ dollar 1117 versus NZ dollar 846, respectively, p = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Despite a trend towards reduced hospital stay and less use of obstetric intervention, total expenditure in patient management has not reduced with the availability of the fFN assay in our hospital. This may only reflect the slow introduction of a new policy that with time may be implemented to full effect.