NovaSure impedance controlled system for endometrial ablation: three-year follow-up on 107 patients

Re-intervention and patient satisfaction rates following office radiofrequency endometrial ablation: a comparative retrospective study of 408 cases

This retrospective study assessed the efficacy and long-term satisfaction of radiofrequency endometrial ablation outside the context of clinical trials in 408 women, and compared the outcome between office-setting (211, 52%) and day-case procedures under general anaesthetics (197, 48%). The Kaplan Meir time-to-event analysis showed that the cumulative number of women undergoing surgical re-intervention was 32 with a probability of 9.4% (95% CI: 6.3 - 12.5%) at 2-years, and 45 with a probability of 14.5% (95% CI: 10.3 - 18.2%) at 5-years. There was no statistically significant difference in the re-intervention rate between office and day-case groups (HR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.68 - 3.1, p = .3). The satisfaction rate, measured by Visual Analogue Scale, was not statistically different (p = .5) between office (109; 80.7%) and day-case (96; 82.8%) groups. This study showed lower surgical re-intervention rate than previously reported in observational studies, and high rates of long-term women satisfaction. The outcomes were similar in office and day-case settings.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Previous studies have shown the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency endometrial ablation for treating heavy periods. However, studies investigating it, outside clinical trials, either included a small sample size, a short-term follow-up, poor reporting so that it is impossible to judge whether some women underwent re-intervention in another centre, failed to discriminate in analysis between second-generation techniques, or assessed only short-term satisfaction.What do the results of this study add? This is the largest series reported from a single centre and the first study reporting long-term satisfaction in women, outside clinical trials. Surgical re-intervention was used as the primary outcome measure which is an objective measure rather than the change in the monthly flow which is rather subjective. More importantly, the study records the similarity, in the outcome and women's satisfaction rate, between office and day-case procedures under general anaesthetics.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Endometrial ablation service is widely implemented in office-setting in the UK. We hope the result of this study encourages implementation on a larger scale in office across centres in the world with its multiple advantages both to women and service alike.

Clinical analysis of 2152 cases of abnormal uterine bleeding treated by NovaSure endometrial ablation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficiency, postoperative hysterectomy rate, and influencing factors for therapeutic effect of the NovaSure endometrial ablation procedure in abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2152 patients from the Department of Gynecology at the Third Xiangya Hospital, CSU from October 2010 to December 2018.

RESULTS

From the first year to the eighth year after operation, annual effective rate was above 95.24%, and the differences were not statistically significant. There are statistically significant differences between the effective and ineffective groups with regard to age, intrauterine polyps, total length of the uterus, systemic coagulation disorder, and preoperative hemoglobin. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors associated with systemic coagulation disorders (P = 0.027) and high total uterine length (P = 0.003) affected NovaSure efficacy in the treatment of AUB. By December 2019, the postoperative hysterectomy rate was 1.86% (40/2152) and the complication rate was 1.67% (36/2152).

CONCLUSION

NovaSure is a reliable treatment for AUB and serious medical complications because of its simple operation, low amount of bleeding, quick postoperative recovery, and safe and effective short-term and long-term efficacy. However, it should be carefully selected for patients with a total uterus length exceeding 10 cm.

Endometrial ablation

Endometrial ablation (EA) includes a spectrum of procedures performed with or without hysteroscopic direction, designed to destroy the endometrium for the treatment of the symptom of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) secondary to a spectrum of causes, but most commonly those that are endometrial in origin (AUB-E) or ovulatory disorders (AUB-O). Resectoscopic endometrial ablation (REA) is often mistakenly referred to as the "first generation" technique, while proprietary devices that do not use the resectoscope (nonresectoscopic EA or NREA) are often misperceived as "second generation" devices. Indeed, the origins of NREA date back to the late 19th century with the use of steam, and the early and mid 20th century, when radiofrequency and cryotherapy based NREA techniques were published - long before the resectoscope was used and reported. The NREA devices have also been mislabeled as "global", a misleading term borrowed from the marketing departments of device manufacturers - there is no device that predictably treats the entire endometrium. Consequently, none can be construed as being "global". Instead, EA is a procedure designed for women as an alternative to hysterectomy, or, perhaps, medical therapy, when future fertility is no longer desired. Women who select EA should anticipate a relatively low risk procedure that will likely reduce their HMB to normal levels or less. This paper will review the spectrum of EA techniques and devices, their clinical outcomes and adverse events, and explore their value compared to hysterectomy and selected medical therapies.

Effect of Radiofrequency Endometrial Ablation on Dysmenorrhea

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine rates of dysmenorrhea after radiofrequency endometrial ablation in patients with and without known dysmenorrhea symptoms prior to the procedure in a diverse population.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

Academic gynecology practice.

PATIENTS

A total of 307 women underwent endometrial ablation between 2007 and 2013 at our institution. Patients who had preoperative and postoperative pain symptom assessments as well as a description of pain timing recorded were included in our analysis. Exclusion criteria were age <19 years and operative biopsy findings consistent with complex atypical hyperplasia.

INTERVENTIONS

The difference in preoperative and postoperative rates of dysmenorrhea was evaluated. Demographic information and other outcome variables were used to evaluate factors associated with resolution of dysmenorrhea.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 307 patients who underwent radiofrequency endometrial ablation were identified. After exclusions, 296 charts were examined, and 144 patients met our enrollment criteria. The mean age of the study cohort was 45.4 ± 6.2 years; 57 patients (40%) were African American, 16 (11%) had a body mass index (BMI) > 40, and 41 (29%) were of normal weight. Preoperative dysmenorrhea was reported by 100 patients (69%); 48 of these patients (48%) experienced resolution of symptoms postoperatively. Only 3 of the 44 patients (7%) without preoperative dysmenorrhea reported new-onset dysmenorrhea postoperatively. Significantly fewer patients had dysmenorrhea after compared to before radiofrequency ablation (55 of 144 [38%] vs 100 of 144 [69%]; p < .001). Resolution of dysmenorrhea after ablation was associated with reduction in bleeding volume (p = .048) but not with a reduction in frequency of bleeding (p = .12).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-half of women who undergo radiofrequency endometrial ablation to treat heavy menstrual bleeding who also have preoperative dysmenorrhea exhibit documented pain resolution after the procedure. Resolution of dysmenorrhea is more likely if menstrual flow volume is decreased postprocedure.

Efficacy and safety of endometrial ablation for treating abnormal uterine bleeding in pre- and postmenopausal women with liver cirrhosis

AIM

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) occurs in 10-30% of women of reproductive age and up to 61% of cirrhotic women. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of endometrial ablation (NovaSure therapy) for AUB in cirrhotic women.

METHODS

This prospective, two-arm, observational study enrolled patients for NovaSure treatment, and they were followed for 12 months. Primary measurements were the amenorrhea rate and changes of pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBLAC) scores at 1-month post-therapy. Key secondary end-points included the longevity of amenorrhea at 12 months, safety profile, and progression of cirrhosis.

RESULTS

Among 88 women, 26 were cirrhotic and 62 were non-cirrhotic. At 1-month post-NovaSure treatment, a significant reduction of mean PBLAC scores was observed in cirrhotic patients compared to those at baseline (0.4 ± 1.3 vs 215.2 ± 410.9, P < 0.001), and the amenorrhea rate was 88.5%. The efficacy outcomes of the PBLAC scores and amenorrhea rate were maintained until the end of the 12-month follow-up. A significant improvement in quality of life scores was observed 1-month post-therapy compared to those at baseline (5.4 ± 3.1 vs 20.5 ± 5.5, P < 0.001). Patients' satisfaction rates were 100% and 92.31% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The aforementioned outcomes were comparable with those in non-cirrhotic patients. No significant progression of cirrhosis or safety concern was reported.

CONCLUSION

Cirrhotic patients on NovaSure therapy had a high rate of amenorrhea 1-month post-treatment, which maintained longevity for 12 months. The safety profile was similar to that in non-cirrhotic patients.

Nonsurgical, radiofrequency collagen denaturation for stress urinary incontinence: retrospective 3-year evaluation

Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation, a nonsurgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence, reduces regional dynamic tissue compliance without causing tissue necrosis or gross tissue shrinkage, unlike transvaginal radiofrequency tissue ablation. This retrospective study evaluated long-term safety and efficacy in 21 patients from a 12-month, randomized controlled trial utilizing 3-day diaries and the Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) survey. Significant increases in overall I-QOL scores 3 years or more post treatment was the primary end point. Secondary end points were reductions in frequency and severity of incontinence episodes. After 3 years, mean overall I-QOL score improvement was 12.7 (+/-26); 56% of patients achieved 50% or more reduction in frequency. No new adverse events occurred. These results indicate that radiofrequency collagen denaturation is safe and provides durable efficacy.

[Does repeated endometrial destruction procedure decrease abnormal uterine bleeding, and does it reduce the number of hysterectomies in this indication?]

OBJECTIVE

Hysteroscopic endometrial resection or destruction in the indication of abnormal uterine bleeding or post-menopausal bleeding represents an alternative to hysterectomy, as it carries a lower morbidity rate. In case of failure of such procedure though, hysterectomy will most often be proposed as a second line of treatment. The place of the repetition of an endometrial destruction procedure has not yet been evaluated. The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficiency and the satisfaction after two consecutive techniques of endometrial destruction in case of abnormal uterine bleeding or post-menopausal bleeding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Nineteen patients presenting with recurring abnormal uterine bleeding after one procedure of endometrial destruction, underwent in our department, between 2004 and 2011, a second conservative endometrial procedure.

RESULTS

No complication occurred during the repeated procedure. Sixteen of the nineteen patients (84.2 %) included answered a questionnaire. The mean delay since the second procedure was 27 months [25; 29]. Eight patients (i.e. 50 %) later underwent a hysterectomy, with 5 of them (31.25 % of all 16 patients) being directly attributed to treatment failure. Patients said to be satisfied with the management of their condition in 68.75 % of cases, and 93.75 % of them would recommend it to a friend.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that a second conservative management in case of recurrence of AUB is effective. Hysterectomy could be avoided in 50 % of cases. A second conservative treatment could be an interesting option for patients with medical contra-indication for heavier surgery, as well as for patients willing to keep their uterus.

[Evaluation of endometrectomy by radiofrequency for premenopausal women: a retrospective study]

OBJECTIVE

In present study, we are assessing the efficiency of endometrial ablation by radiofrequency (Novasure(®)) for the treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 90 patients underwent an endometrial ablation by radiofrequency for uterine bleeding between 2009 and 2012. For the postoperative follow-up, symptoms amelioration and eventual adverse-events were evaluated by a self-administered questionnaire given to all patients after the surgery.

RESULT

Sixty-five patients (74%) responded to the questionnaire with an average of 17.5 months. Among them, endometrial bleeding decreased in 92% of the cases (IC 95%; 86-99). The amenorrhea rate was 55% (IC 95%; 43-67) and 36% of the patients presented a diminution of menstrual bleeding after treatment. Thirty-two patients (36%) presented dysmenorrhea before the radiofrequency and 78% of them experienced an amelioration of the symptoms after treatment (IC 95%; 64-93). In 19 patients (21%), the cause of uterine bleeding was adenomyosis, among them, bleeding decreased in 84% of the cases (IC 95%; 71-98) and dysmenorrhea in 70%. (IC 95%; 41-97). Finally, 84% of the patients were satisfied with the result of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that endometrial radiofrequency is effective for the treatment of menometrorrhagia, dysmenorrhea and also adenomyosis.

NovaSure(): the bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation system for dysfunctional uterine bleeding

The bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation system (NovaSure()) has been developed to treat women suffering from menorrhagia due to dysfunctional uterine bleeding. This technology allows for a customized, controlled, contoured endometrial ablation, without the need for hysteroscopic visualization and endometrial pretreatment. Average treatment time is 90 s. Active bleeding, at the time of treatment, is not found to be a limiting factor for the use of this technology. Technical aspects of the bipolar radiofrequency ablation procedure are described and summarized in this article. The safety features employed, combined with a high level of effectiveness and patient satisfaction, qualifies this system for consideration as a logical alternative to hysterectomy as well as an alternative to hysteroscopic endometrial ablation.

Complications of Uterine Fibroids and Their Management, Surgical Management of Fibroids, Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy versus Hysterectomy, Haemorrhage, Adhesions, and Complications

A critical analysis of the surgical treatment of fibroids compares all available techniques of myomectomy. Different statistical analyses reveal the advantages of the laparoscopic and hysteroscopic approach. Complications can arise from the location of the fibroids. They range from intermittent bleedings to continuous bleedings over several weeks, from single pain episodes to severe pain, from dysuria and constipation to chronic bladder and bowel spasms. Very seldom does peritonitis occur. Infertility may result from continuous metro and menorrhagia. The difficulty of the laparoscopic and hysteroscopic myomectomy lies in achieving satisfactory haemostasis using the appropriate sutures. The hysteroscopic myomectomy requires an operative hysteroscope and a well-experienced gynaecologic surgeon.

Endometrial ablation with the NovaSure system in Iran

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the rate of response to treatment with the NovaSure endometrial ablation device among Iranian women with menorrhagia.

METHODS

Twenty 35-50-year-old women with menorrhagia who were referred to Arash Hospital, Tehran, Iran, in 2008 were enrolled. They underwent endometrial ablation via the NovaSure system and were followed-up for 2 years.

RESULTS

The incidence of amenorrhea was 30.0% at the end of the 2-year follow-up period. Hypomenorrhea was reported by 40.0% of women. The mean number of days of bleeding per month decreased significantly, from 30.0 ± 6.4 days before treatment to 3.1 ± 2.6 days after 2 years (P < 0.001). The severity of bleeding decreased significantly within 2 years after treatment (P < 0.001). In total, 85.0% of women were satisfied and 90.0% had responded to treatment-as defined by amenorrhea, hypomenorrhea, or return to normal menstruation.

CONCLUSION

The NovaSure system is effective and should be considered by gynecologists for the treatment of menorrhagia.

Imaging in Gynecologic Surgery

The technical development of instruments for endoscopic surgery started in the field of gynecology. In the early 1970s, with the improvement of optics and instruments for laparoscopic surgery, gyne-endoscopic surgery developed and set milestones for all other surgical fields. However, the general surgeons propagated the advantages of 2D or 3D imaging surgery much better than the conservative gynecologists. Surgery on a 2D screen without direct vision is regarded as more advantageous than open surgery and has achieved wide acceptance. Several schools of gynecologic endoscopy in Europe (in Kiel, Giessen, Clermont Ferrand and Strasbourg) have set guidelines for gyne-endoscopic surgery. Our catalog of indications in the areas of gyne-endoscopic surgery, published in 2002, reveals the broad application of these techniques today. 3D vision, robotic instruments and systems, such as the da Vinci® Surgical System from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (CA, USA), round up the picture of endoscopic surgery. The advantages of endoscopic surgery over open surgery (more precision, less trauma, less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays and a faster recovery period) are becoming more accepted. The present healthcare systems and hospital administrations understand the challenges of imaging in surgery, particularly in endoscopic surgery.

Prediction of treatment outcomes after global endometrial ablation

OBJECTIVE

To report rates of amenorrhea and treatment failure after global endometrial ablation and to estimate the association between patient factors and these outcomes by developing and validating prediction models.

METHODS

From January 1998 through December 2005, 816 women underwent global endometrial ablation with either a thermal balloon ablation or radio frequency ablation device; 455 were included in a population-derived cohort (for model development), and 361 were included in a referral-derived cohort (for model validation). Amenorrhea was defined as cessation of bleeding from immediately after ablation through at least 12 months after the procedure. Treatment failure was defined as hysterectomy or reablation for patients with bleeding or pain. Logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used in model development and validation of potential predictors of outcomes.

RESULTS

The amenorrhea rate was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19-28%) and the 5-year cumulative failure rate was 16% (95% CI 10-20%). Predictors of amenorrhea were age 45 years or older (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.6, 95% CI 1.6-4.3); uterine length less than 9 cm (aOR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.1); endometrial thickness less than 4 mm (aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6.3); and use of radio-frequency ablation instead of thermal balloon ablation (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.7-4.9). Predictors of treatment failure included age younger than 45 years (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-5.1); parity of 5 or greater (aHR 6.0, 95% CI 2.5-14.8); prior tubal ligation (aHR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.0); and history of dysmenorrhea (aHR 3.7, 95% CI 1.6-8.5). After global endometrial ablation, 23 women (5.1%, 95% CI 3.2-7.5%) had pelvic pain, three (0.7%, 95% CI 0.1-1.9%) were pregnant, and none (95% CI 0-0.8%) had endometrial cancer.

CONCLUSION

Population-derived rates and predictors of treatment outcomes after global endometrial ablation may help physicians offer optimal preprocedural patient counseling.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Abnormal uterine bleeding: a review of patient-based outcome measures

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and evaluate the patient-based outcome measures (PBOMs) that have been used to study women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).

DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING

Original articles that used at least one PBOM and were conducted within a population of women with AUB.

PATIENT(S)

Women with AUB.

INTERVENTION(S)

The titles, abstracts, and studies were systematically reviewed for eligibility. The PBOMs used in eligible studies were summarized. Essential psychometric properties were identified, and a list of criteria for each property was generated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

"Quality" of individual PBOMs as determined using the listed criteria for psychometric properties.

RESULT(S)

Nine hundred eighty-three studies referenced AUB and patient-reported outcomes. Of these, 80 studies met the eligibility criteria. Fifty different instruments were used to evaluate amount of bleeding, bleeding-related symptoms, or menstrual bleeding-specific quality of life. The quality of each of these instruments was evaluated on eight psychometric properties. The majority of instruments had no documentation of reliability, precision, or feasibility. There was no satisfactory evidence that any one instrument completely addressed all eight psychometric properties.

CONCLUSION(S)

Studies of women with AUB are increasingly using PBOMs. Many different PBOMs were used; however, no single instrument completely addressed eight important measurement properties.

A survey of preferences and practices of endometrial ablation/resection for menorrhagia in the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVE

To survey the preferences and variations in the current use of first- and second-generation endometrial ablative techniques for menorrhagia among the consultant gynecologists in the United Kingdom, given the call for further studies to systematically compare the clinical effectiveness of the various endometrial ablation techniques.

DESIGN

Postal questionnaire survey.

POPULATION

One thousand, four hundred sixty consultant gynecologists in the United Kingdom.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Preferred endometrial ablation/resection method and variations in the current practices.

RESULT(S)

Six hundred ten (41%) consultants responded. Of these, 449 (73%) performed endometrial ablation/resection. Thermal balloon ablation (32.1%) was the preferred method, followed by microwave endometrial ablation (29.8%), transcervical resection of the endometrial alone or combined with roller ball diathermy (18.5%), Novasure (9.8%), hydrotherm ablation (6.9%), roller ball (2%), and laser (0.9%). Patient response to treatment was assessed using clinical history (64.3%), menstrual calendar (7.6%), clinical history and menstrual calendar (21.3%), questionnaires (5.8%), and pictorial blood loss assessment charts (0.4%). A total of 52.2% used gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues preoperatively. Variations in techniques for transcervical resection of the endometrial included methods used to treat the uterine fundus and cornuae, fluid management, and operating pressures.

CONCLUSION(S)

Second-generation endometrial ablation devices were preferred to first-generation devices for the management of menorrhagia. Thermal balloon ablation was the most preferred method. However, variations in surgical practices will make assessment of clinical efficacy a challenge.

Second-generation endometrial ablation – an overview

Various methods exist to destroy the endometrium as a treatment for menorrhagia. This chapter discusses the rationale, evidence, indications, and long-term safety and efficacy of the current techniques. It also discusses endometrial ablation in the context of its clinical utility in comparison with the existing alternative treatments.

Five-year follow up of a randomised controlled trial comparing NovaSure and ThermaChoice endometrial ablation

OBJECTIVE

We have previously reported that NovaSure was more effective than balloon ablation at 12 months follow up in the treatment of menorrhagia. In this paper, we report the 5-year outcome of this study. The objective was to evaluate amenorrhoea rates, hysterectomy rate, and quality of life associated with the bipolar impedance-controlled endometrial ablation technique (NovaSure) in comparison with balloon ablation technique (ThermaChoice) at 5 years after administration.

DESIGN

Double-blind randomised controlled trial, 2:1 randomisation NovaSure versus ThermaChoice.

SETTING

A teaching hospital with 500 beds in The Netherlands.

POPULATION

A total of 126 premenopausal women suffering from menorrhagia with a pictorial blood loss assessment count > or = 150 without intracavitary abnormalities.

METHODS

Women were randomly allocated to bipolar radio-frequency ablation and balloon ablation in a 2:1 ratio.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were amenorrhoea rate, hysterectomies, and health-related quality of life (HRQol) as reported at 5 year follow up.

RESULTS

At 5 years of follow up, the total response rate was 96% in the bipolar group and 90% in the balloon group. Amenorrhoea was reported in the bipolar group by 48% of women and in the balloon arm by 32% (relative risk 1.6 [.93-2.6]). There were eight women in the bipolar group (9.8%) and five in the balloon group (12.9%) who had undergone a hysterectomy. Furthermore, there was a significant equal improvement of HRQoL over time in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

At 5 years follow up, bipolar thermal ablation was superior over balloon ablation in the treatment of menorrhagia.

Radiofrequency global endometrial ablation followed by hysteroscopic sterilization

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe the feasibility of performing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization immediately after NovaSure global endometrial ablation (GEA).

DESIGN

Descriptive feasibility study (Canadian Task Force classification III).

SETTING

Midwestern United States academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Twenty-five women (aged 35-49 years) with menorrhagia who elected GEA treatment and requested concurrent permanent sterilization.

INTERVENTIONS

NovaSure GEA followed immediately by Essure hysteroscopic sterilization. Patients returned 3 months after the procedure for hysterosalpingography (HSG) to document tubal occlusion.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The inserts were placed successfully in all 25 patients; 21 returned for 3-month follow-up HSG, as recommended. Bilateral tubal occlusion was documented at 3 months in 19 patients (90%) and unilateral occlusion in 2 patients. Six-month postprocedural HSG in these 2 patients documented bilateral tubal occlusion. Hysterosalpingography was not performed in 4 patients. In all 21 patients with appropriate follow-up, complete occlusion was documented, and the ability to perform or interpret HSG was not affected by endometrial ablation.

CONCLUSION

Essure hysteroscopic sterilization can be safely performed after NovaSure GEA. Intrauterine synechiae do not appear to adversely affect the ability to perform HSG at 3 months or to document tubal occlusion.

Chinese Herbal Medicine for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding: a Meta-analysis

We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) by performing a meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing CHM vs no treatment, placebo, conventional western medicine (CWM), or general non-specific surgical treatment for DUB were identified by electronic and manual searches. Trials of CHM treatments with CWM treatments were compared with CWM treatments alone. Jadad scale and allocation concealment were used to assess the quality of included studies. Four RCTs or quasi-RCTs involving 525 patients were included. The methodological quality was poor in all trials except one trial. No serious adverse events were reported in the included studies. With the lack of trials comparing CHM with no treatment or placebo, it is impossible to accurately evaluate the efficacy of CHM. However, CHM in these studies seem to show an encouraging comparative effectiveness with CWM. More RCTs with a higher quality are required.

Global Endometrial Ablation for Menorrhagia in Women With Bleeding Disorders

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of global endometrial ablation in women with bleeding disorders who presented with menorrhagia.

METHODS

A records-linkage system was used to construct a retrospective cohort of 41 women with bleeding disorders (coagulopathy) and a reference group of 111 randomly selected women without bleeding disorders from a pool of 943 women who underwent global endometrial ablation (with thermal balloon ablation technology or bipolar radiofrequency ablation technology) for menorrhagia at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) from January 1995 through December 2005. Demographic data, type of global endometrial ablation therapy and reablation, and hysterectomy data were extracted from the database.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in baseline age, parity, body mass index, uterine size, type of global endometrial ablation therapy, or duration of follow-up between the groups. Two women (5%) in the coagulopathy group had hysterectomy or reablation, compared with 8 (7%) in the reference group (Fisher exact test, P=.728). A Kaplan-Meier plot showed no difference in the time to treatment failure between the groups (log-rank test, P=.534). Procedural-related complications were generally minor and infrequent (9 of 152 [6%]). Complications were equally distributed in the coagulopathy (4 of 41) and reference groups (6 of 111) (Fisher exact test, P=.267).

CONCLUSION

Global endometrial ablation is an effective treatment choice for women with coagulopathy presenting with menorrhagia.

Use of in-office anesthesia during non-surgical radiofrequency collagen denaturation for stress urinary incontinence

OBJECTIVE

Clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of non-surgical, transurethral radiofrequency (RF) collagen denaturation for treating female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) due to hypermobility. Women in those trials were anesthetized using intravenous conscious sedation. This multicenter trial aimed to demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of an oral sedation and local anesthetic regimen in performing RF collagen denaturation.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This single-arm study enrolled 33 women, each diagnosed with SUI due to hypermobility, at three United States sites (private physician offices). All women were pretreated with an oral sedative (diazepam) and antibiotic (quinolone) and underwent a bilateral peri-urethral block using 10 cc total of 2% lidocaine. Non-surgical, transurethral RF collagen denaturation was then performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The feasibility of the in-office anesthetic regimen was determined based on the number of RF collagen denaturation treatments completed without conversion to intravenous conscious sedation. To assess the patients' subjective level of pain, a visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = no pain; 10 = terrible pain) was completed by each patient immediately before discharge.

RESULTS

The in-office anesthetic regimen allowed for treatment completion in all patients (100% feasibility). On the VAS, 42% of the women rated their pain as 0; the mean pain score was 1.4 (SD 1.8). One woman (3% prevalence) experienced two clinically minor adverse events not conclusively related to the anesthetic regimen; both resolved spontaneously without treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this trial were similar to those of larger, sham-controlled studies using intravenous conscious sedation and showed non-surgical RF collagen denaturation to be feasible, safe, and effective when performed using in-office anesthesia.

Second-generation endometrial ablation treatment: Novasure

The Novasure endometrial ablation system consists of a single-use device and a radiofrequency controller. It is a three-dimensional, triangular-shaped bipolar ablation device. The generator functions at 500 kHz and has a power cut-off limit set at a tissue impedance of 50 Ohms. The self-terminating procedure is based on tissue impedance or time. A cavity assessment system works to detect perforations in the uterine cavity. No pretreatment is necessary. Randomized controlled trials have shown that the Novasure system has an amenorrhoea rate of 44-56% at 1-year follow-up, and the 5-year results of a randomized trial will be published shortly. Prospective observational studies show even higher amenorrhoea rates of up to 58-75% up to 5-year follow-up. Hysterectomy rates in the prospective trial were very low (4%). In summary, the Novasure endometrial ablation system is an effective second-generation ablation technique, resulting in a high percentage of amenorrhoea.

Nonsurgical transurethral radiofrequency treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women

A transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation system was recently approved by the US FDA for nonsurgical, outpatient treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence associated with urethral hypermobility. Controlled radiofrequency energy applied through a transurethral probe heats submucosal tissue to produce collagen denaturation, resulting in reduced tissue compliance without necrosis, thus distinguishing this procedure from transvaginal radiofrequency tissue ablation. Treatment can be administered in 30 min under local anesthesia, without incisions, use of cystoscopy or other visualization of the treatment site. Safety and efficacy have been demonstrated in several studies, including a 12-month, multicenter, sham-procedure-controlled clinical trial in 173 women with mild-to-moderate stress urinary incontinence. In patients receiving active treatment, two of the four groups experienced significant quality-of-life changes (p = 0.004; p = 0.02), and all women exhibited significant increases in Valsalva leak point pressure (p = 0.02 vs sham group).

NovaSure impedance controlled endometrial ablation: Long-term follow-up results

STUDY OBJECTIVE

A 7-year follow-up evaluation of the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcome of endometrial ablation when using the NovaSure system in patients with menorrhagia secondary to abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).

DESIGN

Prospective, single-arm study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).

SETTING

St. Imre Teaching Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.

PATIENTS

Seventy-five premenopausal women with menorrhagia secondary to AUB.

INTERVENTIONS

Endometrial ablation using the NovaSure System without the use of endometrial pretreatment.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Loss of menstrual blood was measured using pictorial blood loss assessment chart diaries. Treatment times, complications, and rate of surgical re-interventions were recorded. No intra or postoperative complications were noted. Median follow-up period at the time was 7.8 years (range 6-8.6 years). The proportion of patients with fewer than 7 and 7 or more years of follow-up was 28.8% and 71.2%, respectively. The median treatment time was 92 seconds (range 40-120 seconds). At 7-year follow-up, 97.1% of evaluable patients reported amenorrhea. However, all patients (100%, actuarial rate: 97% with 95% CI [83%-100%]) experienced a successful reduction in bleeding to normal levels or less. Six of 75 patients underwent hysterectomy, and one of 75 had a repeat ablation representing a total of 92% (95% CI: 83%-96%) avoidance of additional surgery during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical results demonstrate that the use of NovaSure System is safe and effective, with a low rate of surgical re-intervention at 7-year follow-up.

Assessment of New Technology in the Treatment of Idiopathic Menorrhagia and Uterine Leiomyomata

New technologies available for the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia include five global endometrial ablation devices that use differing ablative methods, including thermal balloon, circulated hot fluid, cryotherapy, radiofrequency electrosurgery, and microwave energy. All have been compared with rollerball endometrial ablation by way of randomized clinical trials and are associated with high patient satisfaction rates, regardless of method, but a wide range of amenorrhea rates (13.9-55.3%). They are associated with low complication rates when performed by well-trained physicians following protocols in Food and Drug Administration trials. Some serious complications have been reported subsequently. Strict adherence to patient selection criteria and manufacturer protocols is strongly recommended. New technologies for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata include uterine artery embolization, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasonography, laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion, and cryomyolysis. There is sound evidence for shorter hospital stay, quicker return to work, and a similar major complication rate compared with hysterectomy. Uterine artery embolization appears to be effective for up to 5 years in reducing bulk symptoms and menorrhagia associated with leiomyomata. The chance of reoperation for leiomyoma-related symptoms within 5 years is 20-29%. Women who wish to become pregnant should be cautioned about potential complications during pregnancy. There is insufficient evidence to recommend uterine artery embolization in postmenopausal women. With regard to magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasonography, cryomyolysis, and laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion, although the initial symptom reduction outcomes have been reported as favorable, more data are needed to better understand the durability of these results.

Use of the NovaSure Impedance Controlled Endometrial Ablation System in patients with intracavitary disease: 12-month follow-up results of a prospective, single-arm clinical study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and effectiveness of the NovaSure Impedance Controlled Endometrial Ablation System for the treatment of excessive uterine bleeding in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with intracavitary disease (polyps or myomas) up to 3 cm.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-arm study. (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2.)

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

This clinical study was conducted in 65 women with menometrorrhagia with confirmed (type I and II) submucous myomas up to 3 cm with and without polyps.

INTERVENTION

Patients were treated with the NovaSure System and received no hormonal or mechanical pretreatment to thin the endometrial lining or as a uterine pathologic condition shrinking agent.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All patients were diagnosed with intracavitary disease during office hysteroscopy. Patients completed menstrual questionnaires at the initial screening and at 1 year after treatment. Twelve-month results demonstrated that the NovaSure System was effective in reducing excessive uterine blood loss. Success (defined as reduction to normal bleeding) was observed in 95% (95% CI: 86%-99%) of patients, with 69% (95% CI: 56%-80%) reporting amenorrhea at 1 year after treatment. The median treatment time (time of energy delivery) was 78 seconds (range 61-120 seconds). All patients underwent the procedure under local or intravenous sedation. No intraoperative or postoperative adverse events were reported. There was a significant decrease in premenstrual symptoms and dysmenorrhea at 12 months after the procedure. Ninety-five percent (95% CI: 86%-99%) of patients were satisfied with the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Clinical results of this study demonstrate that the NovaSure System is safe and effective in treatment of patients with menometrorrhagia caused by intracavitary disease up to 3 cm.

Clinical and health service implications of second generation endometrial ablation devices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review evaluates the current evidence on the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of the ever-increasing number of second-generation endometrial ablation devices.

RECENT FINDINGS

The literature covered by this review includes (1) evidence on long-term benefit, avoidance of hysterectomy and improvement in quality of life, (2) applicability of these techniques in the outpatient environment under local or no anaesthesia, (3) frequency and nature of early and delayed complications associated with these devices, (4) impact on clinical practice and the health service, and (5) implications for research.

SUMMARY

Where appropriate, second-generation devices are rapidly becoming the first-line surgical choice for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding. This has both cost-savings and negative implications for the health service. There is also emerging evidence that improvement in quality of life is more relevant to women than amenorrhoea rates. What has come to light from this review is the lack of accurate data on adverse events rate, and the urgent need for a better appreciation of the frequency and nature of complications.

Endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review evaluates the currently available evidence regarding resectoscopic endometrial ablation (REA) and the various nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation (NREA) techniques used for heavy menstrual bleeding.

RECENT FINDINGS

Laser endometrial ablation is now used infrequently, largely because of procedure time, but also because of the cost and training associated with the technique. REA can be performed in a wider spectrum of endometrial cavity configurations than NREA and, at least in expert hands, remains the gold standard. Each of the five available types of NREA device possesses advantages and disadvantages over the others with respect to variables such as treatment time, required cervical dilation, and size and configuration of the endometrial cavity. All provide acceptable results that are comparable to that of REA in expert hands. Serious complications seem to be less common with NREA, but uterine perforation and bowel or other visceral injury can still occur. When endometrial-ablation patients were followed for up to 5 years, repeat surgery rates ranged from 20 to 40%, thereby eroding both the direct and indirect treatment-related resource utilization. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices demonstrate similar clinical and patient-satisfaction outcomes to endometrial ablation but can be inserted in the office and allow maintenance of fertility.

SUMMARY

Both REA and NREA provide at least short- to intermediate-term options to hysterectomy for patients with heavy menstrual bleeding and normal or near-normal endometrial cavities. Consequently, the ideal candidates are likely those who are within 5 years of menopause.