Morphine inhibits migration of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes and suppresses angiogenesis associated with tumor growth in mice

Potential influence of different peri-operative analgesic regimens on tumour biology and outcome after oncologic surgery: A narrative review

The management of peri-operative pain is one of the pillars of anaesthesia and is of particular importance in patients undergoing surgery for solid malignant tumours. Amongst several options, the most commonly employed analgesic regimens involve opioids, NSAIDs and regional anaesthesia techniques with different local anaesthetics. In recent years, several research reports have tried to establish a connection between peri-operative anaesthesia care and outcome after cancer surgery. Experimental studies have indicated that certain pain management substances may influence cancer progression, mainly by modifying the tumour's response to surgical stress and peri-operative inflammation. However, these promising in-vitro and in-vivo data have yet to be confirmed by randomised clinical trials. The reason for this might lie with the nature of tumour biology itself, and in the diversity of patient and tumour phenotypes. In a translational approach, future research should therefore concentrate on patient and tumour-related factors or biomarkers, which might either influence the tumour and its microenvironment or predict potential responses to interventions, including the choice of the analgesic. This might not only be relevant for the daily practice of clinical anaesthesia, but would also be of great importance for patients undergoing cancer surgery, who might be able to receive an individualised anaesthetic regimen based on their phenotypic profile.

Anesthetic Approaches and Their Impact on Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review

Cancer recurrence and metastasis remain critical challenges following surgical resection, influenced by complex perioperative mechanisms. This review explores how surgical stress triggers systemic changes, such as neuroendocrine responses, immune suppression, and inflammation, which promote the dissemination of residual cancer cells and circulating tumor cells. Key mechanisms, such as epithelial-mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis, further enhance metastasis, while hypoxia-inducible factors and inflammatory responses create a microenvironment conducive to tumor progression. Anesthetic agents and techniques modulate these mechanisms in distinct ways. Inhaled anesthetics, such as sevoflurane, may suppress immune function by increasing catecholamines and cytokines, thereby promoting cancer progression. In contrast, propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia mitigates stress responses and preserves natural killer cell activity, supporting immune function. Opioids suppress immune surveillance and promote angiogenesis through the activation of the mu-opioid receptor. Opioid-sparing strategies using NSAIDs show potential in preserving immune function and reducing recurrence risk. Regional anesthesia offers benefits by reducing systemic stress and immune suppression, though the clinical outcomes remain inconsistent. Additionally, dexmedetomidine and ketamine exhibit dual effects, both enhancing and inhibiting tumor progression depending on the dosage and context. This review emphasizes the importance of individualized anesthetic strategies to optimize long-term cancer outcomes. While retrospective studies suggest potential benefits of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia and regional anesthesia, further large-scale trials are essential to establish the definitive role of anesthetic management in cancer recurrence and survival.

Morphine treatment restricts response to immunotherapy in oral squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are becoming the standard of care for recurrent and metastatic cancer. Opioids, the primary treatment for cancer-related pain, are immunosuppressive raising concerns about their potential to interfere with the efficacy of ICIs. We hypothesize that exogenous opioids given for analgesia suppress antitumor immunity via T cell-mediated mu opioid receptor 1 (OPRM1) signaling.

METHODS

In silico bioinformatics were used to assess OPRM1 receptor expression on tumor-infiltrating immune cells in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and across different cancer types. A syngeneic orthotopic mouse model of oral squamous cell carcinoma was used to study the impact of morphine and OPRM1 antagonism on tumor-infiltrating immune cells, tumor growth and antitumor efficacy of anti-Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody treatment.

RESULTS

In patients with HNSCC, OPRM1 expression was most abundant in CD8+ T cells, particularly in patients who had not been prescribed opioids prior to resection and exhibited increased expression of exhaustion markers. Exogenous morphine treatment in tumor-bearing mice reduced CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell infiltration and subsequently anti-PD1 ICI efficacy. Peripherally acting mu opioid receptor antagonism, when administered in the adjunctive setting, was able to block morphine-induced immunosuppression and recover the antitumor efficacy of anti-PD1.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that morphine acts via a peripheral OPRM1-mediated mechanism to suppress CD8+ T cells, thereby fostering a pro-tumor-impaired immune response. Importantly, peripherally-restricted OPRM1 antagonism can effectively block this morphine-induced immunosuppression while still allowing for centrally-mediated analgesia, indicating a potential therapeutic strategy for mitigating the adverse effects of opioid pain relief in cancer treatment.

The Role of Anesthetic Management in Lung Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Although surgical treatment is a primary approach, residual cancer cells and surgery-induced pathophysiological changes may promote cancer recurrence and metastasis. Anesthetic agents and techniques have recently been shown to potentially impact these processes by modulating surgical stress responses, immune function, inflammatory pathways, and the tumor microenvironment. Anesthetics can influence immune-modulating cytokines, induce pro-inflammatory factors such as HIF-1α, and alter natural-killer cell activity, affecting cancer cell survival and spread. Preclinical studies suggest volatile anesthetics may promote tumor progression by triggering pro-inflammatory signaling, while propofol shows potential antitumor properties through immune-preserving effects and reductions in IL-6 and other inflammatory markers. Additionally, opioids are known to suppress immune responses and stimulate pathways that may support cancer cell proliferation, whereas regional anesthesia may reduce these risks by decreasing the need for systemic opioids and volatile agents. Despite these findings, clinical data remain inconclusive, with studies showing mixed outcomes across patient populations. Current clinical trials, including comparisons of volatile agents with propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia, aim to provide clarity but highlight the need for further investigation. Large-scale, well-designed studies are essential to validate the true impact of anesthetic choice on cancer recurrence and to optimize perioperative strategies that support long-term oncologic outcomes for lung cancer patients.

New insights in the mechanisms of opioid analgesia and tolerance: Ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide down-modulates vascular endothelial growth factor-A in the nervous system

Growing evidence suggests that opioid analgesics modulate angiogenesis during pathophysiological processes. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) was recently proposed to be involved in pain development. To date, no anti-angiogenic drug is used for pain management. When administered in a bioavailable formulation, (i.e., ultramicronized) N-palmitoylethanolamine (PEA) delays the onset of morphine tolerance, improves morphine analgesic activity and reduces angiogenesis in in vivo models. This study aimed at investigating whether VEGF-A is involved in PEA-induced delay of morphine tolerance. The anti-VEGF-A monoclonal antibody bevacizumab was used as a reference drug. Preemptive and concomitant treatment with ultramicronized PEA delayed morphine tolerance and potentiated the analgesic effect of morphine, while counteracting morphine-induced increase of VEGF-A in the nervous system. Similar results were obtained when bevacizumab was administered together with morphine. Of note, bevacizumab showed an analgesic effect per se. In equianalgesic treatment regimens (obtained through increasing morphine doses and associating PEA), PEA resulted in lower expression of VEGF-A in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and spinal cord compared to morphine alone. Similar results were observed for plasma levels of the soluble VEGF receptor 1 (sFLT-1). Moreover, in morphine-treated animals, two pain-related genes (i.e., Serpina3n and Eaat2) showed a more than 3-fold increase in their expression at spinal cord and DRG level, with the increase being significantly counteracted by PEA treatment. This study supports the hypothesis that the effects of PEA on morphine analgesia and tolerance may be mediated by the down-modulation of VEGF-A and sFLT-1 in the nervous system and plasma, respectively.

Anesthetic Techniques and Cancer Outcomes: What Is the Current Evidence?

It is almost 2 decades since it was first hypothesized that anesthesia technique might modulate cancer biology and thus potentially influence patients' long-term outcomes after cancer surgery. Since then, research efforts have been directed towards elucidating the potential pharmacological and physiological basis for the effects of anesthetic and perioperative interventions on cancer cell biology. In this review, we summarize current laboratory and clinical data. Taken together, preclinical studies suggest some biologic plausibility that cancer cell function could be influenced. However, available clinical evidence suggests a neutral effect. Observational studies examining cancer outcomes after surgery of curative intent for many cancer types under a variety of anesthetic techniques have reported conflicting results, but warranting prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Given the large patient numbers and long follow-up times required for adequate power, relatively few such RCTs have been completed to date. With the sole exception of peritumoral lidocaine infiltration in breast cancer surgery, these RCTs have indicated a neutral effect of anesthetic technique on long-term oncologic outcomes. Therefore, unless there are significant new findings from a few ongoing trials, future investigation of how perioperative agents interact with tumor genes that influence metastatic potential may be justified. In addition, building multidisciplinary collaboration to optimize perioperative care of cancer patients will be important.

Impact of opioids and mu-opioid receptors on oncologic metastasis

Opioids are the most effective and widely used treatments for acute and chronic pain in patients with cancer. This review focuses on the impact of opioids and mu-opioid receptors (MORs) on the stages of oncologic metastasis. Studies have shown that opioids can facilitate tumor progression and are related to a poor prognosis in patients with cancer. As the primary receptor for opioids, MORs play a significant role in regulating malignant tumor transformation and are involved in processes, such as proliferation, angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and the tumor microenvironment (TME). While clinical trials have investigated the relationship between opioids and patient prognosis, further research is needed to clarify the relationship between opioids, MORs and metastasis.

Pain Management in Animals with Oncological Disease: Opioids as Influencers of Immune and Tumor Cellular Balance

Advancements in understanding pain physiopathology have historically challenged animals' absence of pain senses. Studies have demonstrated that animals have comparable neural pain pathways, suggesting that cats and dogs likely experience pain similarly to humans. Understanding brain circuits for effective pain control has been crucial to adjusting pain management to the patient's individual responses and current condition. The refinement of analgesic strategies is necessary to better cater to the patient's demands. Cancer pain management searches to ascertain analgesic protocols that enhance patient well-being by minimizing or abolishing pain and reducing its impact on the immune system and cancer cells. Due to their ability to reduce nerve sensitivity, opioids are the mainstay for managing moderate and severe acute pain; however, despite their association with tumor progression, specific opioid agents have immune-protective properties and are considered safe alternatives to analgesia for cancer patients.

Network pharmacology to explore the mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of ground glass nodules

Background

Ground glass nodules (GGNs) in the lung are considered to be a high-risk factor of lung adenocarcinoma. Immediate surgery is not recommended for GGNs patients, and low-dose computed tomography (CT) is often used for observation and follow-up, which brings high psychological and economic burden to the patient.

Methods

Three traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) prescriptions for the treatment of GGNs were found through database including PubMed, Google Scholar, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Scopus and so on. The possible targets of the active ingredients of the TCM preparations and the gene targets of GGNs were screened out from Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology (TCMSP), UniProt and GeneCards. Network visualization was realized via STRING, Cytoscape 3.7.2, Evenn, DAVID and Hiplot. Finally, molecular docking Vina and PyMOL software were performed to further explore the possibility of drug-target interactions using PubChem compounds, protein data bank (PDB) database, Autodocktools and Autodock.

Results

Three TCM preparations could target the same 13 potential therapeutic targets in GGNs. From network pharmacology, 14 signaling pathways, the functions of the significant targets, an effective ingredient in TCM prescriptions and its functions were obtained.

Conclusions

Chinese herbal formulas containing quercetin could be a potential treatment for GGNs, targeting C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interferon gamma (IFN-γ), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) through the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) pathway, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, and leukocyte transendothelial migration.

Anesthesia and cancer recurrence: a narrative review

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. With the increasingly aging population, the number of emerging cancer cases is expected to increase markedly in the foreseeable future. Surgical resection with adjuvant therapy is the best available option for the potential cure of many solid tumors; thus, approximately 80% of patients with cancer undergo at least one surgical procedure during their disease. Agents used in general anesthesia can modulate cytokine release, transcription factors, and/or oncogenes. This can affect host immunity and the capability of cancer cells to survive and migrate, not only during surgery but for up to several weeks after surgery. However, it remains unknown whether exposure to anesthetic agents affects cancer recurrence or metastasis. This review explores the current literature to explain whether and how the choice of anesthetic and perioperative medication affect cancer surgery outcomes.

Exploring the potential of Toxoplasma gondii in drug development and as a delivery system

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases are various groups of conditions that result in immune system disorders and increased cancer risk. Despite the identification of causative cytokines and pathways, current clinical treatment for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases is limited. In addition, immune-mediated inflammatory disease treatment can increase the risk of cancer. Several previous studies have demonstrated that Toxoplasma gondii manipulates the immune response by inhibiting or stimulating cytokines, suggesting the potential for controlling and maintaining a balanced immune system. Additionally, T. gondii also has the unique characteristic of being a so-called "Trojan horse" bacterium that can be used as a drug delivery system to treat regions that have been resistant to previous drug delivery therapies. In this study, we reviewed the potential of T. gondii in drug development and as a delivery system through current research on inflammation-regulating mechanisms in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Impact of anesthetic factors on prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer after surgery

Background

Nowadays, the influence of anesthesia management on the prognosis of cancer patients has been widely concerned. The goal of this study is to assess the association between anesthetic factors and the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after surgery.

Methods

Patients with NSCLC who underwent surgery from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2009 were selected. Cox proportional hazards model and Logistic regression analysis model were used to screen the independent predictors of prognosis of patients. The primary endpoint was postoperative overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs).

Results

A total of 588 patients were included into the final analysis. The overall RFS was 4.4 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.1-10.1] years, and the OS was 6.2 (IQR, 2.4-10.2) years. Age ≥60 years, advanced tumor stage, and maximal tumor size >3 cm were associated with shortened survival, whereas high BMI grade, mediastinal lymph node dissection, perioperative fentanyl equivalents >28.2 µg/kg, and high tumor grade were associated with prolonged survival (P<0.05); perioperative glucocorticoid administration delayed recurrence (P<0.05); advanced tumor stage and perioperative fentanyl equivalents >28.2 µg/kg were associated with an increased PPCs risk (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The findings from this study revealed that perioperative anesthetic factors may impact the prognosis of patients with NSCLC after surgery. Perioperative opioid and glucocorticoid exposure were independent predictors for outcomes. However, perioperative fentanyl equivalents over 28.2 µg/kg seemed to be beneficial to OS, but contribute to the occurrence of PPCs.

Cannabinoids Transmogrify Cancer Metabolic Phenotype via Epigenetic Reprogramming and a Novel CBD Biased G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling Platform

The concept of epigenetic reprogramming predicts long-term functional health effects. This reprogramming can be activated by exogenous or endogenous insults, leading to altered healthy and different disease states. The exogenous or endogenous changes that involve developing a roadmap of epigenetic networking, such as drug components on epigenetic imprinting and restoring epigenome patterns laid down during embryonic development, are paramount to establishing youthful cell type and health. This epigenetic landscape is considered one of the hallmarks of cancer. The initiation and progression of cancer are considered to involve epigenetic abnormalities and genetic alterations. Cancer epigenetics have shown extensive reprogramming of every component of the epigenetic machinery in cancer development, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, nucleosome positioning, non-coding RNAs, and microRNA expression. Endocannabinoids are natural lipid molecules whose levels are regulated by specific biosynthetic and degradative enzymes. They bind to and activate two primary cannabinoid receptors, type 1 (CB1) and type 2 (CB2), and together with their metabolizing enzymes, form the endocannabinoid system. This review focuses on the role of cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 signaling in activating numerous receptor tyrosine kinases and Toll-like receptors in the induction of epigenetic landscape alterations in cancer cells, which might transmogrify cancer metabolism and epigenetic reprogramming to a metastatic phenotype. Strategies applied from conception could represent an innovative epigenetic target for preventing and treating human cancer. Here, we describe novel cannabinoid-biased G protein-coupled receptor signaling platforms (GPCR), highlighting putative future perspectives in this field.

Influence of Perioperative Anesthesia on Cancer Recurrence: from Basic Science to Clinical Practice

PURPOSEOF REVIEW

In this review, we will summarize the effects of these perioperative anesthetics and anesthetic interventions on the immune system and tumorigenesis as well as address the related clinical evidence on cancer-related mortality and recurrence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cancer remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. For many solid tumors, surgery is one of the major therapies. Unfortunately, surgery promotes angiogenesis, shedding of circulating cancer cells, and suppresses immunity. Hence, the perioperative period has a close relationship with cancer metastases or recurrence. In the perioperative period, patients require multiple anesthetic management including anesthetics, anesthetic techniques, and body temperature control. Preclinical and retrospective studies have found that these anesthetic agents and interventions have complex effects on cancer outcomes. Therefore, well-planned, prospective, randomized controlled trials are required to explore the effects of different anesthetics and techniques on long-term outcomes after cancer surgery. Due to the conflicting effects of anesthetic management on cancer recurrence, further preclinical and clinical trials are required and beneficial to the development of systemic cancer therapies.

Does the Choice of Anaesthesia Affect Cancer? A Molecular Crosstalk between Theory and Practice

In recent years, there has been an increasing scientific interest in the interaction between anaesthesia and cancer development. Retrospective studies show that the choice of anaesthetics may influence cancer outcome and cancer recurrence; however, these studies show contradictory results. Recently, some large randomized clinical trials have been completed, yet they show no significant effect of anaesthetics on cancer outcomes. In this scoping review, we compiled a body of in vivo and in vitro studies with the goal of evaluating the biological effects of anaesthetics on cancer cells in comparison to clinical effects as described in recent studies. It was found that sevoflurane, propofol, opioids and lidocaine are likely to display direct biological effects on cancer cells; however, significant effects are only found in studies with exposure to high concentrations of anaesthetics and/or during longer exposure times. When compared to clinical data, these differences in exposure and dose-effect relation, as well as tissue selectivity, population selection and unclear anaesthetic dosing protocols might explain the lack of outcome.

Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ receptor expression in primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells is not regulated by exposure to breast cancer cell media or angiogenic stimuli

Background

Opioid receptors are naloxone-sensitive (MOP [mu: μ], DOP [delta: δ], and KOP [kappa: κ]) and naloxone-insensitive Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) peptide receptor (NOP). Clinically, most opioid analgesics target MOP. Angiogenesis is the formation of new blood vessels and involves endothelial cell activation, proliferation, and migration. The effect of opioids on this process is controversial with no data for NOP receptor ligands.

Methods

We used patient-derived human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) treated with media from the Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 (MCF-7) breast cancer cells or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; 10 ng ml-1) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF; 10 ng ml-1) as angiogenic stimuli. We have measured (i) NOP/MOP messenger RNA, (ii) receptor protein using N/OFQATTO594 and DermorphinATTO488 as fluorescent probes for NOP and MOP, and (iii) NOP/MOP function in a wound healing assay (crude measure of migration that occurs during angiogenesis).

Results

HUVEC lines from 32 patients were used. Using all 32 lines, mRNA for NOP but not MOP was detected. This was unaffected by media from MCF-7 cells or VEGF/FGF. There was no binding of either N/OFQATTO594(NOP) or DermorphinATTO488(MOP) in the absence or presence of angiogenic stimuli (six lines tested). In the absence of MOP mRNA, this was expected. Whilst MCF-7 conditioned medium (not VEGF/FGF) reduced wound healing per se (14 lines tested), there was no effect of N/OFQ (NOP ligand) or morphine (MOP ligand).

Conclusions

Media from MCF-7 breast cancer cells or VEGF/FGF as angiogenic stimuli did not influence NOP translation into receptor protein. MOP was absent. In the absence of constitutive or inducible MOP/NOP, there was no effect on wound healing as a measure of angiogenesis.

Effect of Opioids on Survival in Patients with Cancer

Opioids are commonly used for pain management in patients with cancer. They have a range of unwanted effects, including some that potentially influence cancer growth. This article reviews the data assessing the effects of opioids on survival in patients with cancer. Many studies assessing this show an association between opioids and decreased survival. This effect is present even at very low doses of opioids. These studies do not assess causality, so it is not known if it is a direct effect of opioids on survival. As the control groups are not matched to the opioid group it might be that opioids are being used to control pain and patients receiving opioids have more aggressive cancers and it is the underlying cancer which is causing the decreased survival. Furthermore, although some studies allude to different opioids having different effects on survival, often all opioids are pooled in analysis. Future work needs to try to ascertain causality and differentiate between different opioids, pain, and cancer-mediated effects on survival in specific cancer types. Until then, opioids should continue to be used in patients with cancer as part of measures to optimise comfort and quality of life.

The µ-Opioid Receptor in Cancer and Its Role in Perineural Invasion: A Short Review and New Evidence

Cancer is a significant public health problem worldwide. While there has been a steady decrease in the cancer death rate over the last two decades, the number of survivors has increased and, thus, cancer-related sequela. Pain affects the life of patients with cancer and survivors. Prescription opioids continue as the analgesic of choice to treat moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain. There has been controversy on whether opioids impact cancer progression by acting on cancer cells or the tumor microenvironment. The μ-opioid receptor is the site of action of prescription opioids. This receptor can participate in an important mechanism of cancer spread, such as perineural invasion. In this review, current evidence on the role of the μ-opioid receptor in cancer growth is summarized and preliminary evidence about its effect on the cross-talk between sensory neurons and malignant cells is provided.

Systemic immune effects of anesthetics and their intracellular targets in tumors

According to the result released by the World Health Organization (WHO), non-communicable diseases have occupied four of the top 10 current causes for death in the world. Cancer is one of the significant factors that trigger complications and deaths; more than 80% cancer patients require surgical or palliative treatment. In this case, anesthetic treatment is indispensable. Since cancer is a heterogeneous disease, various types of interventions can activate oncogenes or mutate tumor suppressor genes. More and more researchers believe that anesthetics have a certain effect on the long-term recurrence and metastasis of tumors, but it is still controversial whether they promote or inhibit the progression of cancer. On this basis, a series of retrospective or prospective randomized clinical trials have been conducted, but it seems to be difficult to reach a conclusion within 5 years or longer. This article focuses on the effects of anesthetic drugs on immune function and cancer and reviews their latest targets on the tumor cells, in order to provide a theoretical basis for optimizing the selection of anesthetic drugs, exploring therapeutic targets, and improving the prognosis of cancer patients.

Opioids and cancer survival: are we looking in the wrong place?

There is a controversial narrative in the anaesthetic literature suggesting that anaesthetic technique (including opioids) may be detrimental to survival after tumour resection. The initial observations were retrospective. Several prospective studies are ongoing; one in breast cancer has reported no adverse outcome. The evidence for an effect of opioids stems from three pieces of information: (1) opioids depress the immune system, (2) opioids potentially promote angiogenesis, and (3) opioids potentially support tumour growth. Although the evidence for (2)/(3) is unclear, combinations of these effects are beneficial to tumours and potentially promote metastatic reseeding. Accepted wisdom suggests that opioid effects are driven by opioid receptor activation but the presence of opioid receptors on immune cells for example is unlikely. Immune cells, vascular endothelium and a range of tumour cells express Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) receptors (for Gram-negative bacterial wall components), and there is growing evidence for opioids interacting with this alternative receptor; and for some there is paradoxical naloxone sensitivity. Is the focus on opioid receptors and cancer the wrong target? TLR4 receptor activation produces immune activation, stimulates angiogenesis, and supports tumour survival. We know that some opioids are more immune suppressive than others (there is no such comparative information for angiogenesis and tumour survival); this may correlate with TLR4 activation. If there are clusters of opioids that have more opioid than TLR4 profiles and vice versa, this may influence outcome. If this is the case, then evidence-based advice could be given for perioperative use in the oncology-anaesthesia setting.

Dose of intra-operative opioids has no impact on recurrence or survival in primary liver cancer

BACKGROUND

Intra-operative use of opioid analgesics might have an impact on cancer recurrence and survival after surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between the intra-operative fentanyl equivalents and survival outcomes in patients with primary liver cancer after receiving hepatectomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center cohort study, and clinical data of 700 patients with primary liver cancer who underwent hepatectomy in Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from September 2013 to August 2018 were reviewed. After propensity matching, 376 patients were included. Patients were divided into high-dose and low-dose groups according to the median intra-operative fentanyl equivalents (1.500 mg). Kaplan Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used.

RESULTS

Results of univariable analysis showed there were no significant differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.136) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.444) between high-dose fentanyl equivalents and low-dose fentanyl equivalents group. The multivariable Cox regression analysis found that the dose of intra-operative fentanyl equivalents was not associated with RFS (HR: 1.119, 95%CI: 0.851-1.472, p = 0.422) or OS (HR: 0.939, 95%CI: 0.668-1.319, p = 0.715).

CONCLUSIONS

The amounts of intra-operative fentanyl equivalents had no impact on recurrence-free or overall survival in patients with primary liver cancer after curative hepatectomy.

The other side of the coin: Positive view on the role of opioids in cancer

Opioids have been used for medicinal purposes as an analgesic and recreational purposes as a euphorigenic throughout human history. Cancer patients are often treated with different doses of opioids concurrently with anti-cancer drugs for pain relief without exhibiting excessive adverse effects. The intersection of the biology of pain, opioid therapy, and disease progression represents the crux of the matters and is of potentially great importance in cancer care. For more than 20 years, multiple investigations have focused on the stimulatory effects of opioids on cancer cell growth, while in-depth studies on the inhibitory effects on cancer cell growth development have usually been neglected. This paper reviews the evidence regarding opioid therapies and their anti-cancer effects on various malignancies. Likewise, we have a glimpse into the molecular mechanisms necessary for pinpointing their positive or negative impacts on malignancies to raise awareness and stimulate more excellent dialogue regarding their carcinogenic/anticarcinogenic roles.

Chronic Cancer Pain: Opioids within Tumor Microenvironment Affect Neuroinflammation, Tumor and Pain Evolution

Pain can be a devastating experience for cancer patients, resulting in decreased quality of life. In the last two decades, immunological and pain research have demonstrated that pain persistence is primarily caused by neuroinflammation leading to central sensitization with brain neuroplastic alterations and changes in pain responsiveness (hyperalgesia, and pain behavior). Cancer pain is markedly affected by the tumor microenvironment (TME), a complex ecosystem consisting of different cell types (cancer cells, endothelial and stromal cells, leukocytes, fibroblasts and neurons) that release soluble mediators triggering neuroinflammation. The TME cellular components express opioid receptors (i.e., MOR) that upon engagement by endogenous or exogenous opioids such as morphine, initiate signaling events leading to neuroinflammation. MOR engagement does not only affect pain features and quality, but also influences directly and/or indirectly tumor growth and metastasis. The opioid effects on chronic cancer pain are also clinically characterized by altered opioid responsiveness (tolerance and hyperalgesia), a hallmark of the problematic long-term treatment of non-cancer pain. The significant progress made in understanding the immune-mediated development of chronic pain suggests its exploitation for novel alternative immunotherapeutic approaches.

Anesthesia and Oncology: Friend or Foe?

Cancer is a leading cause of death, and surgery is an important treatment modality. Laboratory research and retrospective studies have raised the suspicion that the choice of anesthetics for cancer surgery might affect the course of cancerous disease. The aim of this review is to provide a critical overview of the current state of knowledge. Inhalational anesthesia with volatiles or total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol are the two most commonly used anesthetic techniques. Most data comparing volatile anesthetics with TIVA is from either in vitro or retrospective studies. Although conflicting, data shows a trend towards favoring propofol. Opioids are commonly used in anesthesia. Data on potential effects of opioids on growth and recurrence of cancer are scarce and conflicting. Preclinical studies have shown that opioids stimulate cancer growth through the µ-opioid receptor. Opioids also act as immunosuppressants and, therefore, have the potential to facilitate metastatic spread. However, the finding of an adverse effect of opioids on tumor growth and cancer recurrence by some retrospective studies has not been confirmed by prospective studies. Regional anesthesia has not been found to have a beneficial effect on the outcome of surgically treated cancer patients, but prospective studies are scarce. Local anesthetics might have a beneficial effect, as observed in animal and in vitro studies. However, prospective clinical studies strongly question such an effect. Blood products, which may be needed during extensive cancer surgery suppress the immune system, and data strongly suggest a negative impact on cancer recurrence. The potential effects of other commonly used anesthetic agents on the outcome of cancer patients have not been sufficiently studied for drawing valid conclusions. In conclusion, laboratory data and most retrospective studies suggest a potential advantage of TIVA over inhalational anesthesia on the outcome of surgical cancer patients, but prospective, randomized studies are missing. Given the state of weak scientific evidence, TIVA may be used as the preferred type of anesthesia unless there is an individual contraindication against it. Studies on the effects of other drugs frequently used in anesthesia are limited in number and quality, and have found conflicting results.

Application of Anesthetics in Cancer Patients: Reviewing Current Existing Link With Tumor Recurrence

Surgery remains the most effective cancer treatment, but residual disease in the form of scattered micro-metastases and tumor cells is usually unavoidable. Whether minimal residual disease results in clinical metastases is a function of host defense and tumor survival and growth. The much interesting intersection of anesthesiology and immunology has drawn increasing clinical interest, particularly, the existing concern of the possibility that the perioperative and intraoperative anesthetic care of the surgical oncology patient could meaningfully influence tumor recurrence. This paper examines current data, including recent large clinical trials to determine whether the current level of evidence warrants a change in practice. Available pieces of evidence from clinical studies are particularly limited, largely retrospective, smaller sample size, and often contradictory, causing several questions and providing few answers. Recent randomized controlled clinical trials, including the largest study (NCT00418457), report no difference in cancer recurrence between regional and general anesthesia after potentially curative surgery. Until further evidence strongly implicates anesthesia in future clinical trials, clinicians may continue to choose the optimum anesthetic-analgesic agents and techniques in consultation with their cancer patients, based on their expertise and current best practice.

Comparative analysis of the effects of opioids in angiogenesis

BACKGROUND

Angiogenesis, the formation of blood vessel from pre-existing ones, plays an important role in many pathophysiological diseases, such as cancer. Opioids are often used in clinic for the management of chronic pain in cancer patients at terminal phases. Here, we investigated and compared the effects and mechanisms of four opioids on angiogenesis.

METHODS

We performed angiogenesis assays on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) that represent an in vitro model to assess the toxicity of drugs to endothelium.

RESULTS

Morphine and oxycodone at 0.1 μM to 100 μM dose-dependently increased endothelial cell tube formation and proliferation. We observed the same in endothelial cells exposed to fentanyl at 0.1 μM to 10 μM but there was a gradual loss of stimulation by fentanyl at 100 μM and 1000 μM. Morphine and fentanyl reduced endothelial cell apoptosis-induced by serum withdrawal whereas oxycodone did not display anti-apoptotic effect, via decreasing Bax level. Oxycodone at the same concentrations was less potent than morphine and fentanyl. Different from other three opioids, codeine at all tested concentrations did not affect endothelial cell tube formation, proliferation and survival. Mechanism studies demonstrated that opioids acted on endothelial cells via μ-opioid receptor-independent pathway. Although we observed the increased phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) in cells exposed to morphine, fentanyl and oxycodone, the rescue studies demonstrated that the stimulatory effects of morphine but not fentanyl nor oxycodone were reversed by a specific MAPK inhibitor.

CONCLUSION

Our work demonstrates the differential effects and mechanisms of opioids on angiogenesis.

Morphine promotes angiogenesis by activating PI3K/Akt/HIF-1α pathway and upregulating VEGF in hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by the neo-angiogenesis induced by tumor and adjacent cells. It is a leading cancer-related cause of death. Morphine has effects on angiogenesis with pro-angiogenic or anti-angiogenic phonotypes. This study explores the function of morphine on cancer cell growth, angiogenesis and the underlying mechanism in HCC.

Methods

Morphine was used to treat BEL-7402 or HCC-LM3 cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were subsequently incubated in the conditioned media (CM) of HCC cells. The potential effects of cell proliferation, migration and tube formation of CM-treated HUVECs were investigated. Furthermore, the angiogenesis regulated factors of VEGFA, PIGF, ANG-1, ANG-2, FGF-1 and FGF-2 were assessed. siRNA and LY294002 were further used to explore the mechanism mediating the effects of morphine on the angiogenesis pathway. The neovascularization effect by morphine was confirmed through the use of human HCC cancer heterotopic mouse model in vivo.

Results

A significantly increased cell proliferation, migration, and tube formation effect of HUVECs induced by the CM from HCC cell lines treated with morphine was observed. More VEGFA secretion in CM from LM3 or BEL-7402 cell lines was found than the controls (P=0.03 and P=0.027, respectively). VEGFA knock-down could significantly reverse cell proliferation, migration and tube formation induced by the CM from HCC cell lines with morphine treatment. Further molecular experiments indicated that VEGFA secretion was activated by morphine potentially through the PI3K/Akt/HIF-1α pathway. Morphine-induced neovascularization was also observed by the IHC of CD31 and VEGFA.

Conclusions

Morphine promotes angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma possibly through the activation of the PI3K/Akt/HIF-1α pathway and VEGFA stimulation.

Targeting the mu-Opioid Receptor for Cancer Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Opioids are still the most effective and widely used treatments for acute and chronic pain in cancer patients. This review focuses on the impact of opioids and mu-opioid receptors (MOR) on tumor progression and providing new ideas for targeting the MOR in cancer treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies estimated that opioids facilitate tumor progression and are related to the worse prognosis in cancer patients. As the primary receptor of opioids, MOR is involved in the regulation of malignant transformation of tumors and participating in proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. MOR may be a new molecular marker of malignant tumors and thus become a new target for cancer therapy, which may be beneficial to the outcomes of cancer patients.

Anesthetics or anesthetic techniques and cancer surgical outcomes: a possible link

As of 2018 cancer is responsible for almost 9.6 million deaths annually and, with an aging population, the incidence of cancer is expected to continue to rise. Surgery is an important treatment modality for patients with solid organ cancers. It has been postulated that, due to potentially overlapping processes underlying the development of malignancy and the therapeutic pathways of various anesthetic agents, the choice of anesthetic type and method of administration may affect post-operative outcomes in patients with cancer. This is a literature review of the most recent evidence extracted from various databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane, as well as journals and book reference lists. The review highlights the pathophysiological processes underpinning cancer development and the molecular actions of anesthetic agents, pre-clinical and retrospective studies investigating cancer and anesthetics, as well as ongoing clinical trials. Overall, there are conflicting results regarding the impact of regional vs. general anesthesia on cancer recurrence, whilst the majority of data suggest a benefit of the use of intravenous propofol over inhalational volatile anesthetics. The biological changes associated with the surgical inflammatory response offer a unique opportunity to intervene to counteract any potentially cancer-promoting effects.

Anesthesia Medications and Interaction with Chemotherapeutic Agents

Cancer is now a leading health concern worldwide. In an effort to provide these patients with adequate care, coordination between anesthesiologists and surgeons is crucial. In cancer-related treatment, it is very clear that radio-chemotherapy and medical procedures are important. There are some obstacles to anesthesia when dealing with cancer treatment, such as physiological disturbances, tumor-related symptoms, and toxicity in traditional chemotherapy treatment. Therefore, it is important that a multisystemic, multidisciplinary and patient-centered approach is used to preserve perioperative homeostasis and immune function integrity. Adding adjuvants can help increase patient safety and satisfaction and improve clinical efficacy. Correctly paired anesthetic procedures and medications will reduce perioperative inflammatory and immune changes that could potentially contribute to improved results for future cancer patients. Further research into best practice strategies is required which will help to enhance the acute and long-term effects of cancer care in clinical practice.

Effects of Analgesics on Tumor Growth in Mouse Models of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis

Murine models of tumor development often require invasive procedures for tumor implantation, potentially causing pain or distress. However, analgesics are often withheld during implantation because of concerns that they may adversely affect tumor development. Previous studies examining the effects of analgesics on the development and metastasis of various tumor lines show that the effect of analgesics depends on the tumor line and analgesic used. A blanket statement that analgesics affect the general growth of tumors is not adequate scientific justification for withholding pain relief, and pilot studies or references are recommended for each specific tumor cell line and treatment combination. In this study, we evaluated the effects of 2 commonly used analgesics on tumor growth in 2 models of prostate cancer (PCa) bone metastasis. We hypothesized that a one-time injection of analgesics at the time of intratibial injection of tumor cells would not significantly impact tumor growth. Either C57BL/6 or SCID mice were injected subcutaneously with an analgesic (carprofen [5 mg/kg], or buprenorphine [0.1 mg/kg]) or vehicle (0.1 mL of saline) at the time of intratibial injection with a PCa cell line (RM1 or PC3, n = 10 to 11 per group). Tumor growth (measured by determination of tumor burden and the extent of bone involvement) and welfare (measured by nociception, locomotion, and weight) were monitored for 2 to 4 wk. Neither carprofen or buprenorphine administration consistently affected tumor growth or indices of animal welfare as compared with the saline control for either cell line. This study adds to the growing body of literature demonstrating that analgesia can be compatible with scientific objectives, and that a decision to withhold analgesics must be scientifically justified and evaluated on a model-specific basis.

Morphine Stimulates Migration and Growth and Alleviates the Effects of Chemo Drugs via AMPK-Dependent Induction of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Esophageal Carcinoma Cells

The role of morphine, an opioid analgesic drug, in cancer biology has increasingly garnered attention due to its frequent usage in postoperative period for pain management in cancer patients. In this work, we demonstrated that morphine, at clinically relevant concentrations, stimulated migration and growth, and alleviated chemo drugs' efficacy in esophageal carcinoma cells. Although morphine did not affect survival, it protected esophageal carcinoma cells from chemo drugs-induced apoptosis. Mechanistical studies showed that morphine increased RhoA but not Rac1 activity. In addition, morphine activated AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway, induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) via upregulating Snail and Slug levels, and increased oxidative stress in esophageal carcinoma cells. Rescue studies further demonstrated that the stimulatory effects of morphine in esophageal carcinoma cells are through activation of AMPK pathway but not RhoA or opioid receptor. In addition, morphine induced EMT in an AMPK-dependent manner whereas increased RhoA activity in an AMPK-independent manner. Our work demonstrates the protective role of morphine on esophageal carcinoma cells via AMPK activation, which may provide a new guide in clinical use of morphine for patients with esophageal carcinoma.

The role of regional anaesthesia in the emerging subspecialty of onco-anaesthesia: a state-of-the-art review

Cancer accounts for millions of deaths globally each year, predominantly due to recurrence and metastatic disease. The majority of patients with primary solid organ cancers require surgery, however, some degree of tumour dissemination related to surgery is inevitable. The surgical stress response and associated immunosuppression, pain, inflammation, tissue hypoxia and angiogenesis have all been implicated in promoting tumour survival, proliferation and recurrence. Regional anaesthesia was hypothesised to reduce the surgical stress response and immunosuppression, minimise the need for volatile anaesthesia and reduce pain and opioid requirements, thus mitigating pro-tumour pathways associated with the peri-operative period and improving long-term oncological outcomes. While some retrospective studies suggested an association between regional anaesthesia and reduced cancer recurrence, the first large randomised controlled trial on the effect of anaesthetic technique on cancer outcome found no significant difference between paravertebral regional anaesthesia and volatile anaesthesia with opioid analgesia in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Randomised controlled trials on the long-term oncological outcomes of regional anaesthesia in other tumour types are ongoing. The focus on how peri-operative interventions, especially regional anaesthesia, during cancer resection surgery, may enhance short-term recovery and perhaps influence long-term outcome has spawned the global emergence of the subspecialty of onco-anaesthesia. This review aims to discuss the most recent evidence on the use of regional anaesthesia in cancer surgery and the significance of its role in onco-anaesthesia.

Role of neuraxial drug delivery in cancer pain therapy

Opioids have long been the mainstay of cancer pain treatment and have been used without any consideration for their effect on cancer growth and long-term prognosis. There is now growing evidence that the continued use of opioids for this indication should be reviewed and even reconsidered. Although current evidence and literature covering this subject is mixed and does not yet allow for a clear determination to be made about safety, there is enough data to support the search for new treatment paradigms, beginning with anesthesia for oncologic surgery and management of cancer pain over the disease course.

Effects of Anesthesia on Postoperative Recurrence and Metastasis of Malignant Tumors

It is difficult to control the recurrence and metastasis of malignant tumors; furthermore, anesthesia is considered one of the main influencing factors. There has been increasing clinical attention on the effects of anesthetic drugs and methods on postoperative tumor growth and metastasis. We reviewed the effects of anesthesia on tumor recurrence and metastasis; specifically, the effects of anesthetic agents, anesthesia methods, and related factors during the perioperative period on the tumor growth and metastasis were analyzed. This study can provide reference standards for rational anesthesia formulations and cancer-related pain analgesia protocols for surgical procedures in patients with malignant tumors. Moreover, it contributes toward an experimental basis for the improvement and development of novel anesthetic agents and methods.

Sevoflurane inhibits growth factor-induced angiogenesis through suppressing Rac1/paxillin/FAK and Ras/Akt/mTOR

Aim: We investigated the direct effects of sevoflurane on angiogenesis and a variety of tumor cells. Materials & methods: The antiangiogenic activity of sevoflurane was determined using angiogenesis and biochemical assays. Results: Sevoflurane at low doses inhibits capillary network formation. Sevoflurane inhibited VEGF- and bFGF-stimulated migration, adhesion and growth in endothelial cells and induced apoptosis. Sevoflurane only at high doses inhibited growth and migration of tumor cells, suggesting differential effects of sevoflurane between endothelial and tumor cells. Mechanistically, sevoflurane decreased growth factors-induced Ras and Rac1 activation, and suppressed Ras and Rac1 signaling. Conclusion: We demonstrate the antiangiogenic effects of sevoflurane and provide preclinical evidence into the potential mechanisms by which sevoflurane may negatively affect cancer growth and metastasis.

Exogenous morphine inhibits the growth of human gastric tumor in vivo

Morphine is commonly used to relieve severe pain that is often associated with cancer. Previous studies have found that morphine could affect cancer development; however, this effect is poorly understood. To further clarify the anti-cancer potential of morphine for the development of cancer in vivo, we observed how morphine affects the growth of human gastric tumor in a murine xenografting model and the expression of NF-κB and its downstream target genes (Bcl-2/Bax, cyclind1, and VEGF). The growth of the tumor was evaluated by its growth curves. The mRNA expression levels of NF-κB, Bcl-2/Bax, cyclind1, and VEGF were assessed by semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The protein expression of NF-κB, Bcl-2/Bax, cyclind1, and VEGF was detected by immunochemistry staining and western blot. Our data showed that morphine effectively inhibited the tumor growth in the nude mice. Morphine inhibits the expression of NF-κB, Bcl-2, cyclind1, and VEGF while enhancing the expression of Bax in the tumors. Furthermore, the anti-cancer effects of morphine could be reversed by naloxone. The mechanism might be associated with the action of opioid receptors that downregulate the expression of NF-κB leading to the regulation of the downstream target genes (Bcl-2/Bax, cylind1, and VEGF) in the tumors.

Fentanyl inhibits the progression of gastric cancer through the suppression of MMP-9 via the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

Fentanyl is a drug commonly used for perioperative and postoperative analgesia. Previous studies have confirmed that fentanyl can affect the progression of gastric cancer; however, this effect has not yet been elucidated. The purpose of our study was thus to investigate the role of fentanyl in gastric cancer and clarify its potential mechanisms.

METHODS

A CCK-8 assay was used to determine the proliferation of MGC-803 cells, while Transwell assay and wound healing assay were used to determine the invasion and migration abilities, respectively. Apoptosis and the cell cycle were assessed by flow cytometry, and the ultrastructure of the cells was examined with a transmission electron microscope. The mRNA expression levels of serine-threonine protein kinase 1 (Akt-1), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1) were evaluated by real-time (RT) quantitative PCR. The protein expression of p-Akt, MMP-9, and caspase-9 was detected by western blot analysis. To study the interaction of fentanyl with the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/MMP-9 pathway, PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) and MMP-9 inhibitor (SB-3CT) were used to treat the MGC-803 cells.

RESULTS

Findings indicated that fentanyl inhibits the proliferation, invasion, and migration of MGC-803 cells. Specifically, fentanyl inhibits the expression of MMP-9 and enhances the expression of apoptosis-promoting factors such as caspase-9 and DAPK1 through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Cell cycle arrest was observed in the G0/G1 phase. Furthermore, the inhibition of PI3K/Akt/MMP-9 by LY294002 and SB-3CT enhanced the anticancer effects of fentanyl.

CONCLUSIONS

Fentanyl inhibits the proliferation, invasion and migration of gastric cancer cells by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/MMP-9 pathway, which could be very useful for gastric cancer treatment.

Influence of Pain and Analgesia on Cancer Research Studies

Mice and rats are valuable and commonly used as models for the study of cancer. The models and methods of experimentation have the potential to cause pain to some degree, and all charged with ensuring animal welfare must determine how to manage it. A commonly posed question, especially from investigators and IACUC, is whether the provision of analgesic agents will render the model invalid. Left untreated, pain is a stressor and has negative consequences, most notably immune system perturbations. In addition, analgesic agents in the opioid and NSAID drug classes exhibit immunomodulatory activity and influence processes such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis that are important in cancer formation. Therefore, both pain and the agents used to alleviate it have the potential to act as confounding factors in a study. This review article presents data from both human medicine and work with animal models in an attempt to help inform discussions about the withholding of analgesic agents from animals used in cancer studies.

Influence of perioperative anaesthetic and analgesic interventions on oncological outcomes: a narrative review

Surgery is an important treatment modality for the majority of solid organ cancers. Unfortunately, cancer recurrence following surgery of curative intent is common, and typically results in refractory disease and patient death. Surgery and other perioperative interventions induce a biological state conducive to the survival and growth of residual cancer cells released from the primary tumour intraoperatively, which may influence the risk of a subsequent metastatic disease. Evidence is accumulating that anaesthetic and analgesic interventions could affect many of these pathophysiological processes, influencing risk of cancer recurrence in either a beneficial or detrimental way. Much of this evidence is from experimental in vitro and in vivo models, with clinical evidence largely limited to retrospective observational studies or post hoc analysis of RCTs originally designed to evaluate non-cancer outcomes. This narrative review summarises the current state of evidence regarding the potential effect of perioperative anaesthetic and analgesic interventions on cancer biology and clinical outcomes. Proving a causal link will require data from prospective RCTs with oncological outcomes as primary endpoints, a number of which will report in the coming years. Until then, there is insufficient evidence to recommend any particular anaesthetic or analgesic technique for patients undergoing tumour resection surgery on the basis that it might alter the risk of recurrence or metastasis.

Clinically relevant concentrations of lidocaine inhibit tumor angiogenesis through suppressing VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling

BACKGROUND

Angiogenesis, the formation of blood vessel, is required for invasive tumor growth and metastasis. In this study, the effects of lidocaine, an amide-link local anesthetic, on angiogenesis and tumor growth were investigated.

METHODS

In vitro angiogenesis assays were conducted using human umbilical vascular endothelial cell (HUVEC). Essential molecules involved in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling were analyzed. Tumor angiogenesis was analyzed using in vivo mouse tumor model.

RESULTS

Lidocaine at clinically relevant concentrations inhibited angiogenesis. Lidocaine inhibited endothelial cell in vitro capillary network formation on Matrigel through interfering early stage of angiogenesis. In addition, lidocaine inhibited vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-stimulated endothelial cell migration and proliferation without affecting cell adhesion. Lidocaine also induced endothelial cell apoptosis in the presence of VEGF. Lidocaine suppressed VEGF-activated phosphorylation of VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), PLCγ-PKC-MAPK and FAK-paxillin in endothelial cells, demonstrating that VEGF, PLC, MAPK and FAK-paxillin suppression is associated with the antiangiogenic effect of lidocaine. Importantly, the in vitro observations were translatable to in vivo B16 melanoma mouse model. Lidocaine significantly inhibited tumor angiogenesis, leading to delay of tumor growth.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to report that lidocaine acts as an angiogenesis inhibitor. The findings provide preclinical evidence into the potential mechanisms by which lidocaine may negatively affect cancer growth and metastasis.

Opioids and matrix metalloproteinases: the influence of morphine on MMP-9 production and cancer progression

Opioids are widely administered to alleviate pain, including chronic pain in advanced cancer patients. Among opioids, morphine is one of the most clinically effective drugs for the palliative management of severe pain. In the last few decades, there has been a debate around the possible influence of opioids such as morphine on tumour growth and metastasis. Whilst several in vitro and in vivo studies suggest the possible modulatory effects of morphine on tumour cells, little is known about the impact of this analgesic drug on other mediators such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that play a key role in the control of cancer cell invasion and metastasis. MMP-9 has been considered as one of the principal mediators in regulation of not only the initial steps of cancer but during the invasion and spreading of cancer cells to distant organs. Herein, current studies regarding the direct and indirect effects of morphine on regulation of MMP-9 production are discussed. In addition, drawing from previous in vivo and in vitro studies on morphine action in regulating MMP-9 production, the potential roles of several underlying factors are summarised, including nuclear factor kappa-B and intracellular molecules such as nitric oxide.