Prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the 'STONE' nephrolithometry score: A single-centre experience

Does success in percutaneous nephrolithotomy depend only on stone size? Analysis of the predictive capacity for success and complications of the current nephrolithometry scoring systems and their relationship with the stone surface

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the predictive capacity of the nephrolithometry scoring systems (GSS, STONE, CROES and S-ReSC) and stone surface regarding success and complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

METHODS

We studied 392 patients who had undergone PCNL in our center. Only patients with a non-contrast CT (n = 240) were finally included for analysis. The predictive capacities for success and complications of the different scoring systems were evaluated using ROC curves and their area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Regarding success, the S-ReSC system had the highest predictive capacity with an AUC of 0.681 (95% CI 0.610-0.751), followed by the CROES with 0.667 (95% CI 0.595-0.738), the STONE with 0.654 (95% CI 0.579-0.728) and finally the GSS with 0.626 (95% CI 0.555-0.698). The stone surface as a single variable had an AUC of 0.641 (95% CI 0.565-0.718). As for complications, the S-ReSC had the highest AUC with 0.664 (95% CI 0.57-0.758), followed by STONE with 0.663 (95% CI 0.572-0.755), GSS with 0.626 (95% CI 0.555).-0.698) and CROES with 0.614 (95% CI 0.518-0.7). The stone surface alone had an AUC of 0.616 (95% CI 0.522-0.715).

CONCLUSION

The nephrolithometry scales analyzed show a moderate predictive capacity for success and complications in patients undergoing PCNL in our center. Moreover, stone surface as an independent variable demonstrates moderate predictive capacity for both outcomes.

Investigating the effects of tilting the postural drainage lithotripsy system on cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressure, heart rate, and blood pressure

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of the postural drainage lithotripsy system developed by our experimental team on the vital signs of patient with urinary stones during the stone removal process.

METHODS

Four groups of 15 subjects (0°, 10°, 40°, and 70°) were subjected to different angles of head-down tilt to measure middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAv), cerebrovascular conductance coefficient (CVCi), intracranial pressure (nICP), heart rate (HR), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP).

RESULTS

As the angle of HDT changed, MCAv values, nICP values, CVCi values, HR values, and MAP values changed significantly (all P ≤ 0.001), and the difference was statistically significant. During 10°HDT, despite a slight increase in nICP, the other measurements remained stable. During 40°HDT, only the MCAv values did not change significantly, whereas the rest of the measures were significantly altered. During 70°HDT, all indicators changed significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant alterations in cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressure, and hemodynamics induced during the treatment of renal residual fragments with postural drainage should be used with caution in individuals with cerebrovascular accidents.

CHINA CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY

ChiCTR2300070671; Registration date: 2023-04-18.

Clinical Utility of S.T.O.N.E, Guy's Scoring System, and Renal Stone Complexity Scoring in Predicting Outcome of Single-Tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

BACKGROUND

Several imaging-based scores have been developed to predict postoperative stone-free state (SFS) and complications. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the S.T.O.N.E., Guy Scoring System (GSS), and Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity (S-ReSCS) scores in predicting the outcomes of single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (ST-PCNL). This scoring system holds paramount importance for low-income and low-middle-income countries (LMICs), as it is inexpensive and cost-effective for the healthcare system.

METHODOLOGY

This retrospective study was carried out with 147 participants. Based on the preoperative computerized tomographic (CT) scan, each patient's S.T.O.N.E. score, GSS, and S-ReSCS were recorded. The modified Clavien grading system was used to document intra- and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The mean age of the sample population was 45 years. SFS was achieved in 110 (74.8%) patients. The number of calyces involved (p = 0.008), S.T.O.N.E. scoring (p = 0.001), GSS (p = 0.008), and S-ReSCS (0.001) correlated well with the SFS. Forty-nine (33.33%) patients developed complications. The most common complications fell within Clavien grade II. No statistical significance was noted between the S.T.O.N.E. score, GSS, and S-ReSCS with the modified Clavien grading system.

CONCLUSION

The S.T.O.N.E. scoring, GSS, and S-ReSCS have a high predictive value for achieving SFS in ST-PCNL. In addition, findings from LMICs are comparable with those from the rest of the world.

Effects of severe hydronephrosis on surgical outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL)

Introduction

The impact of severe hydronephrosis on the outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) remains controversial; it is still a subject well worth exploration.

Aim

To investigate the effects of severe hydronephrosis on surgical outcomes of MPCNL, especially on operative time (OT) and stone-free rate (SFR).

Material and methods

In total, 301 patients who underwent MPCNL were included in this study and divided into 4 groups according to the degree of hydronephrosis (nil, mild, moderate, and severe hydronephrosis, respectively). Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic analyses were used to determine the risk factors affecting OT and SFR.

Results

Patients with severe hydronephrosis had a longer OT (p < 0.001), a decreased SFR (p < 0.001), and a higher postoperative haemoglobin drop and blood transfusion rate compared to the other 3 cohorts (p = 0.011 and p = 0.043, respectively). Univariate analyses determined that severe hydronephrosis, calyx for access, stone location, stone type, stone size, and number of tracts significantly correlated with OT, while severe hydronephrosis, stone location, stone type, and stone size showed a strong association with SFR (all p < 0.05). Multivariate analyses further identified that severe hydronephrosis (OR = 3.496, p = 0.013), stone location (≥ 4 calyces: OR = 3.024, p = 0.017), stone type (staghorn: OR = 5.204, p = 0.002), and stone size (≥ 1600 mm2: OR = 12.669, p < 0.001; 800-1599 mm2: OR = 5.194, p < 0.001) were significant risk factors affecting OT, while SFR was independently influenced by stone type (staghorn: OR = 4.377, p = 0.039; multiple: OR = 3.778, p = 0.044), stone location (≥ 4 calyces: OR = 4.413, p = 0.020; 2-3 calyces: OR = 3.617, p = 0.034), and severe hydronephrosis (OR = 7.093, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Severe hydronephrosis is a significant risk factor that can lead to longer OT and lower SFR, and correlates with increased risk of bleeding and blood transfusion rate in some cases during MPCNL. Accordingly, severe hydronephrosis is an influential factor that should not be ignored when performing MPCNL.

Stone-scoring systems for predicting complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review of the literature

Objective

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a treatment of choice for larger stones of the upper urinary tract. Currently, several nephrolithometric nomograms for prediction of post-operative surgical outcomes have been proposed, although uncertainties still exist regarding their roles in the estimation of complications.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review on PubMed and Web of Sciences databases including English studies with at least 100 cases and published between January 2010 and December 2021. We identified original articles evaluating correlations between the Guy's stone score, the stone size (S), tract length (T), obstruction (O), number of involved calices (N), and essence or stone density (E) (S.T.O.N.E.), Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES), and Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity (S-ReSC) scores and post-operative complications in adult patients. We also included newly designed nomograms for prediction of specific complications.

Results

After an initial search of 549 abstracts, we finally included a total of 18 papers. Of them, 11 investigated traditional nephrolithometric nomograms, while seven newly designed nomograms were used to predict specific complications. Overall, 7316 patients have been involved. In total, 14 out of 18 papers are derived from retrospective single-center studies. Guy's stone score obtained correlation with complications in five, S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry score in four, while CROES score and S-ReSC score in three and two, respectively. None of the studies investigated minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and all cases have been conducted in prone position. Considering newly designed nomograms, none of them is currently externally validated; five of them predict post-operative infections; the remaining two have been designed for thromboembolic events and urinary leakage.

Conclusion

This review presents all nomograms currently available in the PCNL field and highlights a certain number of concerns. Published data have appeared contradictory; more recent tools for prediction of post-operative complications are frequently based on small retrospective cohorts and lack external validations. Heterogeneity among studies has also been noticed. More rigorous validations are advisable in the future, involving larger prospective patients' series and with the comparison of different tools.

Predicting the outcome of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy using STONE nephrolithometry score-a single-center experience

To predict stone-free and complication rates following mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (m-PCNL) using STONE nephrolithometry score, this prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Patan Hospital. All the patients undergoing m-PCNL were included. The cases were performed in the prone position, a single tract less than 18 French was made, and pneumatic lithotripsy was done. Stone-free rates were assessed with plain X-ray kidney, ureter, and bladder (X-ray KUB) on the first post-operative day or at 15 days follow-up. Complications within 30 days were graded using modified Clavien grading. A total of 106 patients were included in the final analysis. The overall stone-free rate was 83%. Among the individual variables, only staghorn calculus was associated with residual stone (p = 0.007). Patients who were rendered stone-free had statistically significantly lower STONE scores than those with residual stone (p < 0.001). The complication rate was 23%, and the majority were Clavien grade I complications. A higher STONE score had a greater risk of having complications but was not statistically significant (p = 0.11). STONE nephrolithometry score can predict stone complexity pre-operatively and subsequent stone-free status and thus, helps in pre-operative surgical planning and counseling for possible outcomes following m-PCNL.

Evaluation and comparison of S.T.O.N.E. and Guy's scoring systems for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes in supine position

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was applied in the prone position until recently. But also, in recent years supine positions was applied in patients with kidney stones. Predicting how much renal stones can be cleared after surgery and possibility of complications is an important question for both surgeons and patients. Therefore different scoring systems are used to evaluate outcomes of PCNL before surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2018 and 2020, 80 patients with renal stone who underwent PCNL in the supine position were evaluated preoperatively by S.T.O.N.E. and Guy's scoring systems (GSS). The predictions of both scoring systems for stone-free and complication rates in patients who underwent PCNL in the supine position were evaluated. Also, these scoring systems were compared among themselves for reliability.

RESULT

In both scoring systems, there was a statistically significant difference between postoperative stone-free (SF) and residual stone (RS) of patients and in predicting the likelihood of complications in patients. No statistically significant difference was found between the two scoring systems in predicting the stone-free rate.

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed that S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry and Guy's score systems can be used effectively to predict stone-free rate, complications, and operation duration in supine position PCNL for renal stones.

An Assessment of the Impact of Flow Disruptions on Mental Workload and Performance of Surgeons During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of intraoperative disruptions on surgeons’ workload and performance during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Materials and methods

A structured and standardized tool was used to identify disruptions and interferences that occurred during 33 PCNL procedures. The surgical steps during PCNL were divided into four phases: ureteric catheter placement (phase I), puncture and tract dilation (phase II), intra-calyceal navigation and stone fragmentation (phase III), and tube placement (phase IV). Surgeons’ workload was evaluated using a validated tool: Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX), and correlated with the mean observed intraoperative disruptions. All operating team members evaluated the teamwork immediately after the procedure. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics version 22 (IBM, Armonk, NY).

Results

A total of 1,897 disturbances were observed, with an average of 57.48 ± 16.36 disruptions per case. The largest number of disruptions occurred during phase III of PCNL (32.06 ± 14.12). The most common cause of the disruption was people entering or exiting the operating room (OR) (29.1 ± 10.03/case), followed by the ringing of phones or pagers (6.42 ± 2.4). The mean observed intraoperative disruptions were significantly associated with the operating surgeon’s mental workload, and it had a significant impact on all domains of surgeons’ mental workload as measured by SURG-TLX. Compared to other team members, surgeons’ assistants experienced an inferior sense of teamwork (r=-0.433; p=0.012).

Conclusion

Significant intraoperative disruptions were observed during PCNL. They were observed to directly correlate with the surgeon's workload and had a detrimental effect on teamwork. Improving OR dynamics by reducing unnecessary disruptions would help establish an efficient and smooth surgical work environment for safe surgical care.

Fragmentation and propulsive effect of shock wave lithotripsy in treatment of small renal calculi

Background

Small renal calculi are frequently observed in clinical practice, and chemo-lytic therapy has limited effects. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of small renal calculi.

Methods

We studied 60 patients with small renal stones from March 2017 to March 2019. After excluding eight patients with incomplete data, the remaining 52 patients were evaluated. Patients with symptomatic single or multiple stones of 6–8 mm in diameter or asymptomatic on ultrasound and kidney-ureter-bladder radiograph were eligible for inclusion. Small stones were treated by ESWL. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Packages for Social Sciences - version 25 (IBM Corporation).

Results

The mean age of the 52 patients was 34.5 ± 9.5 years. Forty-one (78.8%) patients were symptomatic, while 11 (21.2%) were asymptomatic. Forty-seven (90.4%) had single small renal stones, while four patients had two stones (7.7%) and only one patient had three stones (1.9%). Forty-five stones were successfully treated by ESWL, while 13 stones failed to respond.

Conclusion

ESWL is a useful tool for treating small renal calculi; it works either by fragmenting the stones or by acting as a pushing force. However, further large prospective studies are needed to corroborate the above conclusions.

The Correlation Between STONE Nephrolithometry Score and Hemoglobin Drop in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Objective

In this study, we aimed to determine the correlation between the STONE score [(S)ize of the stone, (T)opography or location, degree of (O)bstruction of the urinary system, (N)umber of stones, and (E)valuation of Hounsfield units] and postoperative hemoglobin drop in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Methods

This was a prospective observational study and all adult patients aged 18-65 years undergoing unilateral, single-tract PCNL using 26 Ch. Amplatz sheath for renal calculi were included. The five variables of the STONE nephrolithometry score were calculated prior to the procedure. The stone-free rates were assessed on imaging at four weeks and complications were graded using the modified Clavien system.

Results

Of the 142 patients included, 75% were below 55 years of age. More than half of our patients were diabetic with more than 60% having a body mass index (BMI) above 25 kg/m². The mean STONE score was 7 with 33% having a high (>9) STONE score. The mean hemoglobin drop was 1.15 +0.92 g/dL with eight patients (5.63%) requiring transfusion and one (0.7%) requiring angioembolization; one patient required readmission for observation. Complete STONE clearance was achieved with PCNL alone in 78.2% of the patients. There was a significant correlation of hemoglobin drop with the STONE score, stone size, and preoperative creatinine clearance. Patients with a hemoglobin drop of >1 g/dL had a higher STONE score and mean stone size. The overall complication rate was significantly higher (10.5%) in patients with a hemoglobin drop of >1 g/dL as compared to those with a hemoglobin drop of <1 g/dL (2.8%).

Conclusion

Stone complexity as measured by the STONE score correlates with post-PCNL hemoglobin drop, stone clearance, and complication rates. The STONE score may be used for preoperative counseling and to evaluate the potential need for transfusion.

Validation of S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry and Guy's stone score for predicting surgical outcome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Background:

The aim of this study was to validate and compare Guy's and S.T.O.N.E. scoring systems in predicting perioperative and postoperative outcome following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Materials and Methods:

From November 2015 to June 2017, 190 patients with renal stones who underwent single tract unilateral PCNL in the prone position were included in our study. Guy's and S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scores were calculated in each case based on preoperative computed tomography images. The association of these scoring systems with stone-free status, length of hospital stay, operative time, and postoperative complications was studied. Regression analysis was done, and receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted.

Results:

Mean S.T.O.N.E. and Guy's stone scores were 8.76 ± 2.29 and 2.70 ± 1.0, respectively. When compared with patients with residual stones, stone-free (SF) patients had significantly lower mean Guy's score (2.58 ± 1.01 vs. 3.23 ± 0.77 [P < 0.001]) and S.T.O.N.E. scores (8.44 ± 2.24 and 10.17 ± 2.0 [P < 0.001]), respectively. On logistic regression analysis, both Guy's score (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48, P = 0.001) and S.T.O.N.E score (OR = 0.78, P = 0.001) were found to be significantly associated with SF status. Both of these scoring systems were also significantly associated with longer operative time (>90 min), prolonged hospital stay (>3 days) and overall complications. No significant difference was found in the area under curve for both scoring systems for stone clearance.

Conclusion:

Both the S.T.O.N.E and Guy's scoring systems were found to predict the outcome of PCNL, either of these could be used in the routine clinical practice for patients' counseling.

Comparing different kidney stone scoring systems for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the predictive performance of five previously described scoring systems (i.e., S.T.O.N.E., Guy's, Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES), the Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity (S-RESC) and the new Stone Kidney Size (SKS) score) for postoperative outcomes regarding stone-free rate (SFR) and complications in adult patients.

METHODS

Data from 349 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in three urology departments were analyzed. SKS, S.T.O.N.E., S-ReSC, CROES and Guy's nephrolithometry scoring systems were used to retrospectively calculate predictions for each patient. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with SFR and complication rates. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated and areas under curves (AUC) were compared to identify the method with the highest predictive value.

RESULTS

Median SKS, S.T.O.N.E., S-ReSC, CROES and Guy's scores were 4, 7, 3, 170.8 and 2, respectively. Overall, SFR was 67.0% (234/349) with a complications rate of 36.7% (128/349). AUCs of each method for predicting stone-free status, highlighted reasonable predictive capabilities with 0.709, 0.806, 0 0.869, 0.207, and 0.735, respectively; however, the S-ReSC scoring system had the best discriminative performance. According to multivariate logistic regression and AUC results, none were effectively capable of predicting complications.

CONCLUSIONS

All scoring systems correlated significantly with stone-free status; although, S-ReSC appears to have the greatest predictive ability. This method is also relatively easy to implement and highly reproducible. However, none of the methods analyzed are able to accurately predict postoperative complications.

[Do the nephrolithometry scoring systems predict the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Comparison of 4 scores: The Guy's stone score, STONE Score, CROES nomogram and S-ReSC score]

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study is to investigate the factors predictive of surgical outcomes of PCNL and to compare the predictability and accuracy of the Guy's stone score, STONE nephrolithometry, CROES nomogram and S-ReSC score.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively the surgical outcomes recorded consecutively and imaging data of preoperative computed tomography scans of patients who underwent PCNL from 2013 to 2016. Patients with asymptomatic residual fragments<4mm were considered stone-free. Preoperative abdominopelvic computerized tomography images of the patients were reviewed and scored according The Guy's stone score, STONE nephrolithometry, CROES nomogram, S-ReSC score by one urologist.

RESULTS

A total of 157 PCNLs were reviewed. The overall stone-free rate was 59% (92/157) with a complication rate of 22% (35/157). Stone Burden<542mm³ is significantly associated with stone-free rate (SFR) (P=0.001). On univariate analysis, all the scoring systems were identified as significant factors in terms of SFR. The Guy's Stone Score, the CROES score and the S-ReSC score were associated with complications (P<0.02). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the CROES score was identified as a significant factor in terms of SFR and complications (P<0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for stone burden, the Guy's, STONE score, CROES core and S-ReSC scores showed good results (0.737/0.674/0.762/0.746/0.710) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although the four scoring systems were significantly associated with SFR, the STONE score was a significant predictive factor for SFR and complications after PCNL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

STONE score versus Guy's Stone Score - prospective comparative evaluation for success rate and complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Purpose

The aim of the current study was to compare Guy's score and STONE score in predicting the success and complication rate of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Materials and Methods

A total of 445 patients were included in the study between July 2015 and December 2016. The patients were given STONE score and Guy's Stone Score (GSS) grades based on CT scan done preoperatively and intra- and post-operative complications were graded using the modified Clavien grading system. The PCNL were done by a standard technique in prone positions.

Results

The success rate in our study was 86.29% and both the GSS and STONE score were significantly associated with a success rate of the procedure. Both the scoring systems correlated with operative time and postoperative hospital stay. Of the total cases, 102 patients (22.92%) experienced complications. A correlation between STONE score stratified into low, moderate, and high nephrolithometry score risk groups (low scores 4-5, moderate scores 6-8, high scores 9-13), and complication was also found (P = 0.04) but not between the GSS and complication rate (P = 0.054).

Conclusion

Both GSS and STONE scores are equally effective in predicting success rate of the procedure.

External validation and comparison of the scoring systems (S.T.O.N.E, GUY, CROES, S-ReSC) for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes for staghorn stones: A single center experience with 160 cases

The aim of this study was validation and comparison of stone scoring systems (S.T.O.N.E, GUY, CROES, S-ReSC) used to predict postoperative stone-free status and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for staghorn stones. A total of 160 patients who had staghorn renal stones and underwent PCNL between January 2012 and August 2015 were included in the current retrospective study. Guy, S.T.O.N.E., S-ReSC (Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity) and CROES (Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society) nephrolithometry scores were calculated for each patient, and their potential association with stone-free status, operative and fluoroscopy time, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were evaluated. Postoperative complications were graded according to the modified Clavien classification, and the correlation of scoring systems with postoperative complications was also investigated. The mean CROES, S.T.O.N.E, Guy and S-ReSC scores were 143.5 ± 33.6, 9.7 ± 1.6, 3.5 ± 0.5 and 6.2 ± 2.0 respectively. The overall stone-free rate was 59%. All scoring systems were significantly correlated with stone-free status in univariate analysis. However, Guy and S-ReSC scores were the only significant independent predictor in multivariate analysis. And all four nomograms failed to predict complication rates. Current study demonstrated that Guy and S-ReSC scoring systems could effectively predict postoperative stone-free status for staghorn stones. However all four scoring systems failed to predict complication rates.

External Validation and Comparisons of the Scoring Systems for Predicting Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes: A Single Center Experience with 506 Cases

BACKGROUND

To validate and compare the stone scoring systems (stone size [S], tract length [T], obstruction [O], number of involved calices [N], and essence or stone density [E] [S.T.O.N.E.], Guy's Stone Score [GSS], Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society [CROES], and Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity [S-ReSC]) used to predict postoperative stone-free status and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

METHODS

A total of 567 patients who underwent PCNL for renal stones between January 2012 and August 2015 were included in the recent retrospective study. Sixty-one patients who had not done preoperative CT were excluded from the study. GSS, S.T.O.N.E., S-ReSC, and CROES nephrolithometry scores were calculated for each patient, and their potential association with stone-free status, operative and fluoroscopy time, and length of stay (LOS) was evaluated. Postoperative complications were graded according to the modified Clavien classification, and the correlation of scoring systems with postoperative complications was also investigated.

RESULTS

The mean CROES, S.T.O.N.E., GSS, and S-ReSC scores were 203.7 ± 59.8, 7.52 ± 1.8, 2.08 ± 0.9, and 3.35 ± 2.2, respectively. The overall stone-free rate was 77.9%. All scoring systems were significantly correlated with stone-free status and operation time. While GSS, S.T.O.N.E., and CROES systems were significantly correlated with complication rates (CR), S-ReSC score failed to predict CR. All scoring systems except S.T.O.N.E. were significantly correlated with LOS. CROES and S-ReSC scores were predictive of estimated blood loss (EBL), while GSS and S.T.O.N.E. failed to predict EBL.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent study demonstrated that S.T.O.N.E., GSS, CROES, and S-ReSC scoring systems could effectively predict postoperative stone-free status. Although S-ReSC scoring system failed to predict CR, the rest three scoring systems were significantly correlated with postoperative CR.

Clinical comparison of the efficiency and security of balloon dilators versus fascial dilators in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL)

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficiency and security of the balloon dilators versus fascial dilators in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL), We compared the difference of intraoperative and postoperative parameters of patients using these two different methods of expansion and having no significant statistic differences in peroperative parameters.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 134 patients undergoing PCNL with upper urinary calculi from January 2012 to January 2014 in Luoyang Central Hospital affiliated to Zhengzhou University. These patients meeting the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups: the group of balloon dilators (group A) and the group of fascial dilators (group B). Two groups were compared for success rate of first expansion, clearance of stone, duration of surgery, intraoperative hemorrhage, blood transfusion rate, postoperative hospitalization and the incidence of complications.

RESULT

In Group A, a total of 91 patients (51 men and 40 women, mean age 51.22±8.96 years, ranged from 28 to 68 years, the calculi maximum diameter from 0.9 to 4.5cm, 28 cases with a history of gravel, mean Body mass index 24.20±2.34, 73 cases with hydronephrosis and 26 cases with underlying diseases such as hypertension, diabetes and the like) undergoing PCNL were retrospectively reviewed. Similarly, In Group B, a total of 43 patients (28 men and 15 women, mean age 49.64±10.62 years, ranged from 15 to 70 years, the calculi maximum diameter from 1.1 to 5.2cm, 18 cases with a history of gravel, mean Body mass index 24.40±2.70, 38 cases with hydronephrosis and 14 cases with underlying diseases such as hypertension, diabetes and the like) undergoing PCNL were retrospectively reviewed. Our results showed that there was a statistically significant better outcome in Group A than in Group B in terms of success rate of first exploration, duration of operation, intraoperative hemorrhage, postoperative hospitalization and the incidence of complications. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference with respect to clearance of stone and incidence of blood transfusion in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Balloon dilators had shorter operation time, less bleeding, higher success rate of first expansion, less postoperative complications and shorter postoperative hospitalization than fascial dilators in PCNL.