Frequency of recovery and relapse in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy on guideline-directed medical therapy

Predictors and prognostic implications of left ventricular ejection fraction trajectory improvement in the spectrum of heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

The latest guidelines emphasize the significance of evaluating the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) trajectory in patients with heart failure (HF). Because patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) have reduction in systolic function, they might be in a trajectory of LVEF improvement after medical and device-based therapies. While previous studies have primarily focused on LVEF improvement in HFrEF, there is limited research on LVEF trajectory improvement across the spectrum of HFrEF and HFmrEF. This study aimed to assess the determinants and prognostic implications of LVEF trajectory improvement in HFrEF and HFmrEF patients.

METHODS

The cohort was classified into the improved group (HFrEF-to-HF with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) and HFmrEF-to-HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)) and the unimproved group (lack of improved group criteria). The primary endpoints were the composite of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization. Predictors of LVEF trajectory improvement were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total 1303 patients were included in the study (improved/unimproved group: n = 497/806). Cox regression analysis showed that the improved group experienced lower risks of prespecified end points than the unimproved group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that atrial flutter, use of spironolactone, and treatment with catheter ablation were associated with LVEF trajectory improvement, while myocardial infarction, prior percutaneous catheter intervention or coronary artery bypass graft, E/e', and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter were identified as negative predictors of LVEF trajectory improvement. In the improved subgroup, the prognosis for the HFrEF-to-HFimpEF and HFmrEF-to-HFpEF was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

LVEF trajectory improvement patients had improved clinical outcomes and it was associated with important clinical, baseline cardiac structure and function, and treatment factors. Outcomes were similar in both HFrEF-to-HFimpEF and HFmrEF-to-HFpEF subgroups. These results suggest that emphasis should be placed on LVEF trajectory improvement to improve the outcomes of this population.

The complete reversal effect following angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and beta-blockers after the primary diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy

Background

Whether combination administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and beta-blockers (BBs) has a "reversal" effect on cardiac structure and function for first-diagnosed idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (FSIDCM) patients with unclear etiologies and inducements is unknown.

Materials and Methods

We studied the effect of the protocol on FSIDCM patients. The effect was investigated in 26 FSIDCM patients. The criteria of "complete reversal" included left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) ≤50 mm for females or ≤55 mm for males and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥45%; the criteria of "partial reversal" was the decreased rate of LVEDD (ΔLVEDD) >10% or the increase rate of LVEF (ΔLVEF) >10%; the criteria of "no reversal" included LVEDD >50 mm for females or >55 mm for males and ΔLVEDD <10%, and LVEF <45% and ΔLVEF <10%.

Results

Within the follow-up period, nine patients showed "complete reversal," eight "partial reversal," and nine "no reversal." Improvements in echocardiogram parameters were the most significant in "complete reversal" patients (P < 0.001), followed by "partial reversal" and "no reversal" patients (P < 0.05). The QRS (Q wave, R wave, S wave) duration and symptoms duration in "complete reversal" patients were the shortest, followed by "partial reversal" and "no reversal" patients.

Conclusion

ACEIs or ARBs and BBs have a "complete reversal" effect on the left ventricular size and function of some FSIDCM patients. Patients with a narrow QRS and short symptom duration may have a good response.

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator for the Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death among Patients With Cancer

Data are limited regarding the characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer who are found eligible for primary defibrillator therapy. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with preexisting cancer diagnoses who become eligible for a primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillator. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-ICD (MADIT-ICD) benefit scores were calculated. The study included 75 cancer patients at a median age of 73 (interquartile range 64, 81) years at heart failure diagnosis. Active cancer was present in 51%. Overall, 55% of the cohort had coronary artery disease and 37% were CRT eligible. We found that 48%, 49%, and 3% of cohorts had low, intermediate, and high MADIT-ICD Benefit scores, respectively. Only 27% of patients underwent primary defibrillator implantation. Using multivariate analysis, indication for CRT and intermediate/high MADIT-ICD Benefit categories were found as independent predictors for implantation (odds ratio 8.42 p <0.001 and odds ratio 3.74 p = 0.040, respectively). During a median follow-up of 5.3 (interquartile range 4.5, 7.2) years, one patient (5%) with a defibrillator had appropriate shock therapy and 2 patients (10%) had bacteremia. Of 13 patients with CRT defibrillator-implants, one patient was admitted for heart failure exacerbation (8%). Using a time-varying covariate model, we did not observe statistically significant differences in the survival of patients with cancer implanted versus those not implanted with primary defibrillators (hazard ratio 0.521, p = 0.127). In conclusion, although primary defibrillator therapy is underutilized in patients with cancer, its relative benefit is limited because of competing risk of nonarrhythmic mortality. These findings highlight the need for personalized cardiologic and oncologic coevaluation.

Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction: Current understanding and future prospects

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a prevalent kind of heart failure in which a significant amount of the ejection fraction can be repaired, and left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction can be reversed or even restored completely. However, a considerable number of patients still present clinical signs and biochemical features of incomplete recovery from the pathophysiology of heart failure and are at risk for adverse outcomes such as re-deterioration of systolic function and recurrence of HFrEF. Furthermore, it is revealed from a microscopic perspective that even if partial or complete reverse remodeling occurs, the morphological changes of cardiomyocytes, extracellular matrix deposition, and abnormal transcription and expression of pathological genes still exist. Patients with "recovered ejection fraction" have milder clinical symptoms and better outcomes than those with continued reduction of ejection fraction. Based on the unique characteristics of this subgroup and the existence of many unknowns, the academic community defines it as a new category-heart failure with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF). Because there is a shortage of natural history data for this population as well as high-quality clinical and basic research data, it is difficult to accurately evaluate clinical risk and manage this population. This review will present the current understanding of HFrecEF from the limited literature.

Fifteen-year mortality and prognostic factors in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: persistent standardized application of drug therapy and strengthened management may bring about encouraging change in an aging society

BACKGROUND

There is scarce data on the long-term mortality and associated prognostic factors in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The study aimed to investigate the all-cause mortality up to 15 years (mean 7.9 ± 5.7 years) in such patients, and the independent prognostic factors influencing their long-term mortality.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-six consecutive patients with DCM were prospectively enrolled from 2002 to 2003. The mean age of patients was 59.5 ± 10.4 years, and approximately 57% were male. They were followed up by telephone or outpatient visit at least every three months until 2019 or all-cause death occurred. Predictors of mortality were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

During the 15 years of follow-up, five patients were lost to follow-up, and the complete data records of 161 patients were included in the analysis. Patients were treated with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB), β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), diuretics and digitalis from 2002 to 2004, and maintained at the maximum tolerated doses between 2004 and 2019. Our safety targets to maintain heart rate and blood pressure at 60-80 beats/min and 90-120/60-80 mmHg, respectively. All-cause mortality in the first five years was 55.9%. The independent risk factors for the 5-year mortality were age ≥ 70 years old (OR = 5.45, P = 0.006), systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 120 mmHg (OR = 3.63, P = 0.004), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) < 450 m (OR = 3.84, P = 0.001). 15-year all-cause mortality was 65.8%. The independent risk factors for 15-year mortality were age ≥ 70 years old (OR = 16.07, P = 0.009), LVEF ≤ 35% (OR = 5.69, P = 0.003), and SBP > 120 mmHg (OR = 9.56, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study was the first to demonstrate the 15-year survival rate of 34% in DCM patients. The DCM patients' first five-year all-cause mortality decreased significantly after continuous standardized treatment and intensive management. The mortality then plateaued in the following 10 years. Age ≥ 70 years, LVEF ≤ 35%, and SBP > 120 mmHg were independent predictors of 15-year all-cause mortality.

Impact of Autophagy on Prognosis of Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Autophagy is a cellular process that degrades a cell's own cytoplasmic components for energy provision and to maintain a proper intracellular environment. Left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) promises a better prognosis for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

OBJECTIVES

The authors tested the hypothesis that autophagy is involved in LVRR and has prognostic value in the human failing heart.

METHODS

Using left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy specimens from 42 patients with DCM (21 LVRR-positive and 21 LVRR-negative) and 7 patients with normal cardiac function (control), the authors performed immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescent labeling of LC3 and cathepsin D and electron microscopic observation in addition to general morphometry under light microscopy.

RESULTS

The clinical characteristics of LVRR-positive patients were similar to those of the LVRR-negative patients, except for pulmonary artery pressure and left atrial dimension. Morphometry under light microscopy did not differ among specimens from DCM patients, regardless of their LVRR status. Electron microscopy revealed that autophagic vacuoles (autophagosomes and autolysosomes) and lysosomes were abundant within cardiomyocytes from DCM patients. Moreover, cardiomyocytes from LVRR-positive patients contained significantly more autophagic vacuoles with higher autolysosome ratios and cathepsin D expression levels than cardiomyocytes from LVRR-negative patients. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age showed that increases in autophagic vacuole number and cathepsin D expression were predictive of LVRR. DCM patients who achieved LVRR experienced fewer cardiovascular events during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors show that autophagy is a useful marker predictive of LVRR in DCM patients. This provides novel pathologic insight into a strategy for treating the failing DCM heart.

Strain parameters for predicting the prognosis of non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy using cardiovascular magnetic resonance tissue feature tracking

BACKGROUND

A considerable number of non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NDCM) patients had been found to have normalized left ventricular (LV) size and systolic function with tailored medical treatments. Accordingly, we aimed to evaluate if strain parameters assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (FT) analysis could predict the NDCM recovery.

METHODS

79 newly diagnosed NDCM patients who underwent baseline and follow-up CMR scans were enrolled. Recovery was defined as a current normalized LV size and systolic function evaluated by CMR.

RESULTS

Among 79 patients, 21 (27%) were confirmed recovered at a median follow-up of 36 months. Recovered patients presented with faster heart rates (HR) and larger body surface area (BSA) at baseline (P < 0.05). Compared to unrecovered patients, recovered pateints had a higher LV apical radial strain divided by basal radial strain (RSapi/bas) and a lower standard deviation of time to peak radial strain in 16 segments of the LV (SD16-TTPRS). According to a multivariate logistic regression model, RSapi/bas (P = 0.035) and SD16-TTPRS (P = 0.012) resulted as significant predictors for differentiation of recovered from unrecovered patients. The sensitivity and specificity of RSapi/bas and SD16-TTPRS for predicting recovered conditions were 76%, 67%, and 91%, 59%, with the area under the curve of 0.75 and 0.76, respectively. Further, Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed that patients with RSapi/bas ≥ 0.95% and SD16-FTPRS ≤ 111 ms had the highest recovery rate (65%, P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

RSapi/bas and CMR SD16-TTPRS may be used as non-invasive parameters for predicting LV recovery in NDCM. This finding may be beneficial for subsequent treatments and prognosis of NDCM patients. Registration number: ChiCTR-POC-17012586.

Clinical significance of ischemia-like electrocardiographic finding during heart failure treatment on left ventricular recovery in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) often show ischemia-like electrocardiographic findings. We aimed to elucidate the clinical impact of ischemia-like electrocardiographic findings in DCM, focusing on left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR).

METHODS

We evaluated 195 patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) and diagnosed with DCM. All patients underwent twelve-lead electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography during hospitalization and at the 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

During hospitalization, 152 (78%) patients experienced ischemia-like ECG findings (Minnesota codes I3, IV1-3, V1-3, or VII1); 43 patients (22%, non-ischemia-like group) did not experience these findings. Ischemia-like ECG findings were normalized during hospitalization in 64 patients (33%, transient-ischemia-like group) but were unchanged in 88 patients (45%, persistent-ischemia-like group). The highest rates of LVRR, defined as an increase in LV ejection fraction from ≥10% to a final value of ≥35%, along with decreased LV end-diastolic dimension of ≥10% during 2 years of follow-up, were shown in the transient-ischemia-like group (transient-ischemia-like group, 91%; persistent-ischemia-like group, 40%; non-ischemia-like-group, 51%; p < 0.001). The transient-ischemia-like group had lowest composite event rates, including readmission for HF, the detection of major ventricular arrhythmia, and sudden cardiac death.

CONCLUSIONS

Normalization of ischemia-like ECG findings during the first HF treatments was associated with a higher occurrence of mid-term LVRR and favorable long-term outcome in patients with DCM.

Late gadolinium enhancement for re-worsening left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Aims

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical parameters including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to predict re‐worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

Methods and results

We included 138 patients with recent‐onset DCM who had an LVEF <45% and underwent LGE of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at diagnosis and echocardiography at the yearly follow‐up [median 6 (4–8.3) years]. Initial LVEF recovery was defined as LVEF increase >10% from baseline, resulting in LVEF ≧45% after treatment. The patients were divided into three groups: (i) improved (n = 83, 60%), defined as those with sustained LVEF ≧45%; (ii) re‐worsening (n = 39, 28%), those with >5% decrease and LVEF <45% after the initial LVEF recovery; and (iii) not‐improved (n = 16, 12%), those without initial LVEF recovery. The primary endpoint was a composite of hospitalization for heart failure or sudden cardiac death. In baseline, LGE was observed in 70 patients. The LGE area was significantly larger in the re‐worsening and not‐improved groups than that in the improved group (P < 0.001). Loess curves of long‐term LVEF trajectories showed that LVEF in the re‐worsening group increased in the first 2 years and slowly declined thereafter. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that LGE area [odds ratio (OR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–1.16, P = 0.004], B‐type natriuretic peptide (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05–2.21, P = 0.030) level at the initial recovery, and LVEF (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86–0.97, P = 0.004) at the initial LVEF recovery were independent predictors of re‐worsening of LVEF. During a median follow‐up of 2273 (interquartile range: 1634–3191) days, the primary endpoint was observed in 31 (22%) patients. Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that the risk of experiencing the primary event in the re‐worsening group was significantly higher (hazard ratio: 4.30, 95% CI 1.63–11.31, P = 0.003) than that in the improved group and was lower than that in the not‐improved group (hazard ratio: 0.33, 95% CI 0.15–0.72, P = 0.006).

Conclusions

Re‐worsening of LVEF was observed in 28% of patients with recent‐onset DCM who showed an initial improvement in LVEF. High LGE burden, higher B‐type natriuretic peptide level, and lower LVEF at the initial LVEF recovery were independent predictors of re‐worsening of LVEF in patients with DCM. Careful observation is recommended for patients with a high risk for re‐worsening of LVEF, even in those with an initial LVEF recovery.

Myocardial Tissue Reverse Remodeling After Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) has improved remarkably in recent decades with guideline-directed medical therapy. Left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (LVRR) is one of the major therapeutic goals. Whether myocardial fibrosis or inflammation would reverse associated with LVRR remains unknown.

METHODS

A total of 157 prospectively enrolled patients with DCM underwent baseline and follow-up cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations with a median interval of 13.7 months (interquartile range, 12.2-18.5 months). LVRR was defined as an absolute increase in LV ejection fraction of >10% to the final value of ≥35% and a relative decrease in LV end-diastolic volume of >10%. Statistical analyses were performed using paired t test and student t test, logistic regression analysis, and linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight (31%) patients reached LVRR. At baseline, younger age, worse New York Heart Association class, new-onset heart failure, lower LV ejection fraction, absence of late gadolinium enhancement, lower myocardial T2, and extracellular volume were significant predictors of LVRR. During the follow-up, patients with and without LVRR both showed a significant decrease of myocardial native T1 (LVRR: [baseline] 1303.0±43.6 ms; [follow-up] 1244.7±51.8 ms; without LVRR: [baseline] 1308.5±80.5 ms; [follow-up] 1287.6±74.9 ms, both P<0.001), matrix and cellular volumes while no significant difference was observed in T2 or extracellular volume values after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with idiopathic DCM, the absence of late gadolinium enhancement, lower T2, and extracellular volume values at baseline are significant predictors of LVRR. The myocardial T1, matrix, and cell volume decrease significantly in patients with LVRR after guideline-directed medical therapy. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: ChiCTR1800017058.

Long-term outcomes of non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤19% on medical therapy

Background

Patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in low resource settings may not have access to devices and expensive therapeutic options. We followed up a cohort of patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with very low left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF≤19%) on low cost medical therapy alone. By selecting patients with such low LVEF, this study was restricted to patients with severe disease. We studied long-term transplant free survival of these patients.

Methods and results

The study enrolled 130 patients (83 men and 47 women) of DCM cohort with LVEF≤19% from April 2003–December 2018 on medical therapy alone. Mean age was 40.35 ± 13.9 years. Mean follow-up was 45.6 ± 39 months while median follow-up was 39 months (range: 0–176 months). Patients on devices (ICD/CRT) for heart failure management were excluded. Fifty-four patients died and three underwent transplant during the study. Median survival was 86 months (S.E. 22.38). 113 patients had follow-up till end of study. In the worst case scenario, if all 17 patients who were lost to final follow-up were assumed to be dead, the median survival was still 57 (S.E.9.28) months. Higher baseline NYHA class, recurrent heart failure hospitalizations, absence of treatment with beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and aldosterone antagonists were predictors of death on univariate analysis whereas none of these parameters were significant on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Median survival of our DCM cohort with LVEF≤19% on medical therapy was over 7 years.

Decline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction During Follow-Up in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of the decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 1-year follow-up in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) managed conservatively.

BACKGROUND

No previous study has explored the association between LVEF decline during follow-up and clinical outcomes in patients with severe AS.

METHODS

Among 3,815 patients with severe AS enrolled in the multicenter CURRENT AS (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis) registry in Japan, 839 conservatively managed patients who underwent echocardiography at 1-year follow-up were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was a composite of AS-related deaths and hospitalization for heart failure.

RESULTS

There were 91 patients (10.8%) with >10% declines in LVEF and 748 patients (89.2%) without declines. Left ventricular dimensions and the prevalence of valve regurgitation and atrial fibrillation or flutter significantly increased in the group with declines in LVEF. The cumulative 3-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was significantly higher in the group with declines in LVEF than in the group with no decline (39.5% vs. 26.5%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the excess risk of decline in LVEF over no decline for the primary outcome measure remained significant (hazard ratio: 1.98; 95% confidence interval: 1.29 to 3.06). When stratified by LVEF at index echocardiography (≥70%, 60% to 69%, and <60%), the risk of decline in LVEF on the primary outcome was consistently seen in all the subgroups, without any interaction (p = 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe AS with >10% declines in LVEF at 1 year after diagnosis had worse AS-related clinical outcomes than those without declines in LVEF under conservative management. (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Registry; UMIN000012140).

Explaining Heart Failure Hyper-mortality in Sub Saharan Africa: Global Genomic and Environmental Contribution Review

The annual heart failure (HF) mortality rate in Africa is 34% according to the INTERHF study. This is twice the world average of 16.5% and 3.7 times that of South America, 9%. We review evidence-based explanations for the Hyper-mortality of HF, by comparison of North American, Caribbean, Afro-Brazilian with Sub-Saharan African (SSA) nations profiles, and suggest amelioration. 1 year HF mortality rates in SSA ranged from 29% to 58%, and intra-hospital mortality rate from 8 to 26% (n = 8). A clustering of adverse genetic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) predisposing to hypertension and/or left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in the black diaspora may contribute. A higher prevalence of HF with reduced Ejection Fraction (HF r EF) phenotype, which is associated with greater mortality is more common in SSA nations. Additionally, a worse co-morbidity burden, especially valvular regurgitations causing LV remodeling (LVR), chronic kidney disease (CKD), anemia, lung disease, infections, late presentation in NYHA III/IV, right ventricular disease (RVD) were also common in SSA. Geographic variation in SSA, HF risk factors and co-morbidity was observed. There was sub-optimal use of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) and intracardiac device (ICD) unavailability. Gross Domestic Product -per purchasing power parity (GDP-PPP), which is low in SSA, was inversely correlated both to higher intra-hospital mortality rate % (r = -0.73, r 2 = 0.54 p = 0.038) and higher 1 year HF mortality rate % (r = -0.62, r 2 = 0.38, = 0.098). Localized primary prevention, early detection and prompt treatment of hypertension, diabetes, rheumatic fever, early cardiac valve repair and use of cardiovascular polypill, optimal use of GDMT, national health insurance scheme are advocated to stem the dismal mortality and cost burden of HF.

Clinical significance of early-diastolic tissue velocity imaging of lateral mitral annulus for prognosis of nonischemic left ventricular dysfunction

PURPOSE

We explored the potential of tissue velocity imaging (TVI) for prognosis of nonischemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (LVD).

METHODS

We reviewed 138 nonischemic LVD patients (58 ± 14 years) who underwent both cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiography. Septal and lateral mitral annular TVI data were compared with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR. During a mean follow-up of 24 months, recovery (>15%) of LV ejection fraction and clinical outcomes (cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization) were assessed.

RESULTS

LGE was commonly observed in the basal anteroseptal, inferoseptal, and inferior segments, but infrequently observed in the anterolateral segment. LGE was associated with lower early diastolic, septal (Sep-e' = 5.2 ± 2.0 vs 6.9 ± 2.0 cm/s, P = .031) and lateral (Lat-e' = 7.3 ± 3.0 vs 9.5 ± 2.0 cm/s, P < .001) TVI. The relationship between Lat-e' and anterolateral LGE (area under the curve, AUC 0.834) was much better than that between Sep-e' and inferoseptal LGE (AUC 0.699). The 60 patients with LVD reversibility revealed higher Lat-e' (9.8 ± 2.0 vs 6.7 ± 2.2 cm/s, P < .001) and lower LGE burden (7.3 ± 9.0 vs 22 ± 10%, P < .001), while Lat-e' ≤ 7.8 cm/s appeared unfavorable for 31 events patients. On multivariate analyses, Lat-e' (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99, P = .044) and LVD reversibility (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.16-0.90, P = .018) were still meaningful together with LGE segments and burden.

CONCLUSION

Lat-e' was related with LVD reversibility and a significant predictor of clinical outcomes.

Contemporary Application of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a comprehensive and versatile diagnostic and prognostic imaging modality that plays an increasingly important role in management of patients with cardiovascular disease. In this review, we discuss CMR applications in nonischemic cardiomyopathy, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmias, right ventricular diseases, and valvular heart disease. We emphasize the quantitative nature of CMR in current practice, from volumes, function, myocardial strain analysis, and late gadolinium enhancement to parametric mapping, including T1, T2, and T2* relaxation times and extracellular volume fraction assessment.

Dilated cardiomyopathy with re-worsening left ventricular ejection fraction

Re-worsening left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is observed in some patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) despite initial improvements in LVEF. We analyzed cardiac outcomes and clinical variables associated with this re-worsening LVEF. A total of 180 newly diagnosed DCM patients who received only pharmacotherapy were enrolled. Echocardiography was performed after 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after initiation of pharmacotherapy. Patients were divided into three groups: (1) Improved: (n = 113, 63%), defined as those > 10% increase in LVEF after 12 months and no decrease (> 10%) between 12 and 36 months; (2) Re-worse: (n = 12, 7%), those with > 10% increase in LVEF after 12 months but with decrease (> 10%) between 12 and 36 months; and (3) Not-improved: (n = 55: 30%), those with no increase in LVEF (> 10%) after 12 months. Patients with re-worse group were older (P = 0.04) and had higher brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels after 12 months (P = 0.002) than those in the Improved group. Major cardiac events (sudden death, implantation of a ventricular assist device, and death due to heart failure,) were observed in 13 (7%) patients after 36 months of pharmacotherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that the Re-worse group had a higher risk for cardiac events (hazard ratio 11.7, 95% confidence interval 1.9-90.7, P = 0.01) than the Improved group, but had a similar risk compared with the Not-improved group. Re-worsening LVEF was associated with poor cardiac outcomes in newly diagnosed DCM patients. Age and persistently high-BNP levels after improvement in LVEF were significantly associated with re-worsening LVEF.

[Predictive factors of left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients with idiopathic or secondary dilated cardiomyopathy]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the occurrence of left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) and its predictive factors in patients with idiopathic or secondary dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in a consecutive cohort of patients with DCM admitted in our department between January, 2012 and June, 2016. Based on dynamic echocardiographic findings, LVRR was defined as an absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by ≥100% or an absolute value of LVEF ≥45% with simultaneously an absolute decrease in end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) ≥10 mm or an absolute value of LVEDD ≤55 mm (in men) or ≤50 mm (in women). The patients with LVRR and those without LVRR were compared for clinical data at admission to identify the potential factors for predicting LVRR.

RESULTS

A total of 462 patients, who were followed up for 24.13±15.60 months, were included in this survey. In patients with idiopathic DCM who had LVRR, LVEDD was reduced (P < 0.01), LVEF was improved (P < 0.01) and the mean exercise tolerance was increased significantly (P < 0.01) compared with those in patients without LVRR. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that a shorter course of heart failure (OR=0.913, P < 0.01), a high systolic blood pressure (OR=1.062, P < 0.01), absence of electrolyte imbalance (OR=0.347, P < 0.01), a low red cell distribution width (OR=0.205, P < 0.01), a smaller LVEDD (OR=0.799, P < 0.01) and a greater LVEF (OR= 1.142, P < 0.01) were independent predictors of LVRR in the idiopathic patients. In patients with secondary DCM, LVEDD was reduced (P < 0.01), LVEF was improved (P < 0.01), and the mean exercise tolerance was increased significantly (P < 0.01) compared with those in patients without LVRR. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that a shorter course of heart failure (OR= 0.954, P < 0.01), a low red cell distribution width (OR=1.011, P < 0.01), and implementation of etiological treatment (OR=1.073, P < 0.01) were independent predictors of LVRR in patients with secondary DCM.

CONCLUSIONS

The exercise tolerance, cardiac structure and function can be reversed in some of the patients with idiopathic or secondary DCM by administration of standard therapy for heart failure and etiological treatment.

Comparison of clinical outcomes in peripartum cardiomyopathy and age-matched dilated cardiomyopathy: A 15-year nationwide population-based study in Asia

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), often classified as a form of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), is the myocardial dysfunction that occurs in late pregnancy and through the first few postpartum months.The aim of this study is to investigate the differences in the clinical outcomes of PPCM and DCM.Electronic medical records from 1997 to 2011 were retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients with PPCM were compared with age- and clinical characteristics-matched patients with DCM. Primary outcomes were 1- and 3-year heart failure (HF) readmission, cardiac death, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction, new onset of dialysis, heart transplant, and cerebrovascular accident. Follow-up period was divided into "within the first year" and "after the first year."A total of 527,979 patients (253,166 females) were hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of HF during 1997 to 2011 period. After excluding patients aged <18 and >50 years, patients with other forms of HF, and those with a history of cerebrovascular accidents or coronary artery disease, 797 patients with PPCM and 1267 patients with DCM were evaluated. Propensity score matching yielded 391 patients in each group. Patients with DCM had a significantly worse prognosis compared to those with PPCM for all primary and secondary outcomes at the 1- and 3-year follow-ups. After 1 year, the HF readmission rate did not significantly differ between the 2 diseases, suggesting that HF medications should be aggressively instituted in patients with PPCM.This is the first study to directly compare the clinical outcomes between age-matched patients with PPCM and DCM. Patients with PPCM had a significantly better prognosis across all cardiovascular endpoints compared to patients with DCM.

Contemporary Outcome in Patients With Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Outcome is better in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) than in ischemic heart failure (HF), but morbidity and mortality are nevertheless presumed to be substantial. Most data on the prognosis in IDC stem from research performed before the widespread use of current evidence-based treatment, including implantable devices. We report outcome data from a cohort of patients with IDC treated according to current HF guidelines and compare our results with previous figures: 102 consecutive patients referred to our tertiary care hospital with idiopathic IDC and a left ventricular ejection fraction <40% were included in a prospective cohort study. After extensive baseline work-up, follow-up was performed after 6 and 13 months. Vital status and heart transplantation were recorded. Over the first year of follow-up, the patients were on optimal pharmacological treatment, and 24 patients received implantable devices. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 26 ± 10% to 41 ± 11%, peak oxygen consumption increased from 19.5 ± 7.1 to 23.4 ± 7.8 ml/kg/min, and functional class improved substantially (all p values <0.001). After a median follow-up of 3.6 years, 4 patients were dead, and heart transplantation had been performed in 9 patients. According to our literature search, survival in patients with IDC has improved substantially over the last decades. In conclusion, patients with IDC have a better outcome than previously reported when treated according to current guidelines.