Underlying mechanisms of mistreatment in the surgical learning environment: A thematic analysis of medical student perceptions

New psychometric evidence for the thesis advisor abuse scale (EMAT) in Peruvian university students based on classic and modern procedures

Although evidence of mistreatment toward university students in the academic field has been reported for several years, its study in the context of the development of undergraduate research is still emerging. For this reason, it is necessary to have valid and reliable measurement instruments that allow assessing the magnitude of this problem. The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Thesis Advisor Abuse Scale (EMAT, for its acronym in Spanish) in Peruvian university students. A total of 753 university students (women = 57.4%) from the 3 regions of Peru participated. The internal structure was analyzed under an analytical-factorial approach, and the discrimination and difficulty characteristics of the items were evaluated from the perspective of item response theory (IRT). The findings showed evidence supporting the original three-dimensional structure. Furthermore, all the items on the EMAT have good discriminatory power. Additionally, the EMAT proved to be strictly invariant according to sex, and the reliability coefficients reached high magnitudes. It is concluded that the EMAT is an instrument that has adequate psychometric properties to be used as a measure of mistreatment by advisors in the thesis preparation processes in Peruvian university students.

Neglect as an undefined and overlooked aspect of medical student mistreatment: A systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Although the mistreatment of medical students is a well-researched topic, the scope of mistreatment often leaves out neglect, a subtype for which there is no accepted definition based in the published literature. This review sought to summarize the existing data on the prevalence and descriptors of neglect, identify strategies seen in the literature designed to improve it, and offer a synthesized definition of this phenomenon to guide future research.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, a relevant systematic literature search from 2000 to April 2021 was performed to identify literature on neglect in clinical settings within American medical schools.

RESULTS

Neglect, a poorly defined phenomenon in medical education related to the suboptimal learning environment, is often excluded from research on medical student mistreatment. Neglect is a barrier to a successful learning environment, yet a paucity of data and the heterogeneous nature of the present literature render it difficult to estimate its true prevalence. Studies that include neglect frequently assess it solely as the result of identity discrimination or stated career interests. Recent interventions include promoting longitudinal relationships between students and clinical faculty and establishing teaching expectations.

CONCLUSIONS

Neglect is the mistreatment of medical students by the medical care team via a lack of meaningful inclusion in the clinical environment such that it has a notable negative impact on learning and student well-being, regardless of intentionality. An established definition that is grounded in the literature is required to create a common point of reference and understand its true prevalence, its associated variables, and the best mitigation strategies, as well as to guide future research, which should examine neglect independently and as a consequence of personal and professional identities.

An exploratory university-based cross-sectional study of the prevalence and reporting of mistreatment and student-related factors among Thai medical students

BACKGROUND

Mistreatment is a behavior that reflects disrespect for the dignity of others. Mistreatment can be intentional or unintentional, and can interfere with the process of learning and perceived well-being. This study explored the prevalence and characteristics of mistreatment, mistreatment reporting, student-related factors, and consequences among medical students in Thai context.

METHODS

We first developed a Thai version of the Clinical Workplace Learning Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R) using a forward-back translation process with quality analysis. The design was a cross-sectional survey study, using the Thai Clinical Workplace Learning NAQ-R, Thai Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey, Thai Patient Health Questionnaire (to assess depression risk), demographic information, mistreatment characteristics, mistreatment reports, related factors, and consequences. Descriptive and correlational analyses using multivariate analysis of variance were conducted.

RESULTS

In total, 681 medical students (52.4% female, 54.6% in the clinical years) completed the surveys (79.1% response rate). The reliability of the Thai Clinical Workplace Learning NAQ-R was high (Cronbach's alpha 0.922), with a high degree of agreement (83.9%). Most participants (n = 510, 74.5%) reported that they had experienced mistreatment. The most common type of mistreatment was workplace learning-related bullying (67.7%), and the most common source was attending staff or teachers (31.6%). People who mistreated preclinical medical students were most often senior students or peers (25.9%). People who mistreated clinical students were most commonly attending staff (57.5%). Only 56 students (8.2%) reported these instances of mistreatment to others. Students' academic year was significantly related to workplace learning-related bullying (r = 0.261, p < 0.001). Depression and burnout risk were significantly associated with person-related bullying (depression: r = 0.20, p < 0.001, burnout: r = 0.20, p = 0.012). Students who experienced person-related bullying were more often the subject of filed unprofessional behavior reports, concerning conflict or arguments with colleagues, being absent from class or work without reasonable cause, and mistreatment of others.

CONCLUSIONS

Mistreatment of medical students was evident in medical school and was related to the risk for depression and burnout, as well as the risk of unprofessional behavior.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

TCTR20230107006(07/01/2023).

A concept analysis on the transfer climate in health sciences education

The transfer of learning is complex, with factors such as transfer climate influencing students' transfer of learning. This transfer climate will shape a student's experiences during work-integrated learning and can be modified to enhance the transfer of learning. However, studies on transfer climate are mainly reported from a human resource development context and the outcomes may not be transferable to health sciences education. Furthermore, there is no uniformity in defining and measuring transfer climate. Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis approach was used to describe the antecedents, attributes, and consequences of a positive transfer climate. An information specialist assisted in developing a Boolean search string and searched 15 databases to identify relevant sources. In total, 156 relevant articles were selected from 1448 sources. Data were charted and thematically analyzed. Antecedents comprise interpersonal relationships and theory-practice correlation. The presence of student support, training programs, student characteristics, clinical facilitator characteristics and a well-resourced clinical environment are the attributes of a positive transfer climate and act as learning transfer mediators. Transfer climate consequently influences student, educational, and organizational performance. A conceptual definition for transfer climate was then proposed. It was subsequently concluded that developing competent healthcare professionals and providing support to students depend on the synergy and good working relationship between health services and educational institutions. The insights into modifiable elements to enhance transfer climate could benefit health sciences educators in reconsidering their clinical training models to ensure sufficient support during students' clinical placements to meet the demands for a better-qualified healthcare workforce.

Medical students and mattering on the surgery clerkship rotation

BACKGROUND

Mattering is a psychosocial construct that describes an individual's perception that they make a difference in the lives of others and that they are significant in the world. The purpose of this study was to explore the current perception of behaviors that impact mattering among third year medical students on their surgery clerkship with the goal of improving the clerkship experience.

METHODS

A qualitative interview study was conducted during the 2019-2020 academic year. Medical students who had completed their surgery clerkship at a single institution volunteered to participate. Qualitative thematic analysis of students' comments during interviews were categorized to the three primary domains of mattering: awareness, importance, and reliance.

RESULTS

Six medical student interviews were conducted and responses were coded for the three primary domains of mattering. Eight subthemes emerged highlighting positive observations that may influence student mattering on the surgery clerkship. Awareness behaviors included acknowledging the student's presence, maintaining eye contact, educators offering students their undivided attention, and getting to know the students as individuals. Importance behaviors included taking time to teach, setting expectations early, and providing timely feedback. Reliance behaviors involve developing trust to match autonomy with experience and depending on students to provide unique information about patient care to the team.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings can help educators recognize the words, actions, and behaviors that make medical students feel they matter on their surgery clerkship. Interventions should continue focus on how to increase the sense of awareness, importance, and reliance for both the students and faculty.

Incivility in medical education: a scoping review

Incivility in the workplace, school and political system in the United States has permeated mass and social media in recent years and has also been recognized as a detrimental factor in medical education. In this scoping review, we use the term incivility to encompass a spectrum of behaviors that occur across the continuum of medical education, and which include verbal abuse including rude or dismissive conduct, sexual and racial harassment and discrimination, and sexual and physical assault. We identified research on incivility involving medical students, residents and fellows, and faculty in North America to describe multiple aspects of incivility in medical education settings published since 2000. Our results reinforce that incivility is likely under-reported across the continuum of medical education and also confirmed incidences of incivility involving nursing personnel and patients, not emphasized in previous reviews. The authors suggest a zero-tolerance national policy if this problem is to be resolved.

Bullying, Discrimination, Harassment, Sexual Harassment, and the Fear of Retaliation During Surgical Residency Training: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The negative effects of bullying, discrimination, harassment, and sexual harassment (BDHS) on well-being and productivity of surgical residents in training have been well documented. Despite this, little has changed over the past decade and these behaviors continue. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of each abusive behavior experienced by residents, identify the perpetrators, and examine the reporting tendency.

METHODS

A systematic review of articles published between 2010 and 2020 in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed following PRISMA guidelines. The following search terms were used: bullying, harassment, sexual harassment, discrimination, abuse, residency, surgery, orthopedic surgery, general surgery, otolaryngology, obstetrics, gynecology, urology, plastic surgery, and training.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies with 29,980 surgical residents were included. Sixty-three percent, 43, 29, and 27% of surgical residents experienced BDHS, respectively. Female residents reported experiencing all BDHS behaviors more often. Thirty-seven percent of resident respondents reported burnout, and 33% reported anxiety/depression. Attending surgeons, followed by senior co-residents, were the most common perpetrators. Seventy-one percent did not report the behavior to their institution. Fifty-one percent stated this was due to fear of retaliation. Of those who reported their experiences, 56% stated they had a negative experience reporting.

CONCLUSION

Our review demonstrates high prevalence rates of BDHS experienced by residents during surgical training, which have been associated with burnout, anxiety, and depression. The majority of residents did not report BDHS due to fear of retaliation. Residency programs need to devise methods to have a platform for residents to safely voice their complaints.

Comparison of the Perspectives of Medical Students and Residents on the Surgery Learning Environment

BACKGROUND

The learning environment plays a critical role in learners' satisfaction and outcomes. However, we often lack insight into learners' perceptions and assessments of these environments. It can be difficult to discern learners' expectations, making their input critical. When medical students and surgery residents are asked to evaluate their teachers, what do they focus on?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Open-ended comments from medical students' evaluations of residents and attending surgeons and from residents' evaluations of attendings during the 2016-2017 academic year were analyzed. Content analysis was used, and codes derived from the data. A matrix of theme by learner role was created to distinguish differences between medical student and resident learners. Subthemes were grouped based on similarity into high-order themes.

RESULTS

Two overarching themes were Creating a positive environment for learning by modeling professional behaviors and Intentionally engaging learners in training and educational opportunities. Medical students and residents made similar comments for the subthemes of appropriate demeanor, tone and dialog, respect, effective direct instruction, feedback, debriefing, giving appropriate levels of autonomy, and their expectations as team members on a service. Differences existed in the subthemes of punctuality, using evidence, clinical knowledge, efficiency, direct interactions with patients, learning outcomes, and career decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Faculty development efforts should target professional communication, execution of teaching skills, and relationships among surgeons, other providers, and patients. Attendings should make efforts to discuss their approach to clinical decision making and patient interactions and help residents and medical students voice their opinions and questions through trusting adult learner-teacher relationships.

The "Invisible Student": Neglect as a Form of Medical Student Mistreatment, a Call to Action

The mistreatment of trainees is known to lead to burnout, loss of empathy, and career changes. Medical students in particular are vulnerable to mistreatment due to their lack of seniority and frequent transitions to new teams. Traditionally, initiatives to eliminate medical student mistreatment have focused on preventing their victimization surrounding verbal, physical, and sexual misconduct. While initiatives to eliminate these types of behaviors are exceedingly important, the most common form of mistreatment that is reported by medical students is not these active forms of abuse. Instead, students on their clinical rotations more frequently report the covert "obstruction of learning" or "exclusion from the medical team" as the most common form of mistreatment experienced. Though the passive neglect of a medical student is not seemingly as serious an offense as active abuse, it can certainly have an impactful, lasting negative effect on student development, morale, and career choice. In this perspective, we recognize the importance of observational learning as a component of medical education, but state that the neglect or exclusion of a medical student should not be considered acceptable and should be labeled what it is-a form of mistreatment. We additionally provide examples for how to prevent medical student neglect by establishing a supportive and inclusive teaching environment.

Medical students' perception of behaviors in the clinical learning environment evolve with increasing clinical exposure as measured with situational video vignettes

This cross-sectional study involved matriculating, mid-level and graduating medical students (n = 723) who participated in specific transition courses in our medical school curriculum between August 2016 and March 2019. We used a mixed-methods approach (survey and analysis of narrative comments) to study the evolution in perception of the learning environment by medical students with increasing clinical exposure using four different video vignettes. Differences in student perceptions of mistreatment exists at various levels of training. Compared to graduating students, matriculating students were more likely to perceive reprimanding a student on being late as appropriate behavior (80.5% vs 53.3%, p = 0.001), whereas a significantly higher proportion of the graduating students (15.3%, p = 0.001) perceived it as mistreatment. A majority of the matriculating students (84%, p = 0.001) considered the case of an eager student as mistreatment, while a significantly higher proportion of the graduating students (59.5%, p = 0.001) did not think it was mistreatment. Qualitative analysis of comments from students at different stages of training displayed an increased appreciation of their professional responsibilities and nuanced appreciation of body language and tone as contributing factors in determining whether a situation represented inappropriate behavior. Our results demonstrate that students' perceptions of inappropriate behaviors evolve with increased clinical exposure.

Evaluation of a Preceptorship Model on Third-Year General Surgery Clerkship

BACKGROUND

Medical students increasingly report not feeling meaningfully involved during surgical clerkships. Preceptorship and mentorship through longitudinal experiences ameliorate this problem. A preceptorship model was introduced into the surgery clerkship at our institution to increase contact and improve relationships between students and faculty.

METHODS

The preceptorship model was introduced at select sites in 2017. In contrast to the standard structure in which students are assigned to cases and clinics as needed, preceptorship students are assigned to attending surgeons and follow the surgeons' schedules for the rotation. Student performance data, including final grades, clinical evaluations, and shelf examination scores, were collected for clerkship students from May 2017 to November 2018. Formative and summative evaluations for each student were collected. Qualitative content analysis was used to explore evaluations for themes.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-four students completed the clerkship during the study period; 41 experienced a preceptorship model. There was no difference in student performance across clerkship structures. Summative and formative evaluations for preceptorship students were longer than for traditional students (137 words vs 78 words; p < 0.0001 and 46 words vs 16 words, p = 0.03 respectively). Preceptorship student evaluations contained higher-quality feedback relating to clerkship objectives than those of traditional students. Preceptorship comments also contained more frequent mentions of response to feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

A preceptorship model was successfully implemented on the third-year surgical clerkship at our institution. Although there was no difference between top performers on either clerkship structure, preceptorship students received written evaluations with better feedback as a result of their direct relationship with faculty. Strategies such as this, which improve student-faculty relationships, will be needed as programs find new ways to assess residency applicants.

The Learning Environment in Surgery Clerkship: What are Faculty Perceptions?

OBJECTIVE

Multiple efforts have sought to improve teaching effectiveness and the learning environment (LE), but prior research has not focused on attending physicians' perceptions of mistreatment or contribution to the LE. The purpose of this study was to assess the perception and role of surgical faculty in the medical student LE.

DESIGN

A semistructured interview guide was developed using a comprehensive approach including extensive literature search and focus groups. Data were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was used to identify emergent themes.

SETTING

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, an academic tertiary care facility located in Boston, Massachusetts.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen faculty in the Department of Surgery underwent detailed interviews. Participants were selected using purposive-stratified criterion-based sampling.

RESULTS

Multiple themes emerged: (1) The competing demands on medical student's time are a negative factor in the LE; (2) Faculty expectations conflict with the existing curriculum; (3) Faculty are concerned with the possibility of being reported for providing negative feedback; (4) Faculty remain unfamiliar with policies regarding the LE/mistreatment; (5) A motivated medical student makes the educational interaction more productive independent of specialty of choice.

CONCLUSIONS

Faculty identified that the most important factors contributing to a negative LE were a mismatch between expectations of medical students and faculty, and the conflict between the current curriculum and the faculty member's perceived ideal educational framework. Importantly, faculties were largely unfamiliar with LE/mistreatment policies and standards. These findings suggest a need for targeted curricula for faculty to raise awareness of components of a positive LE and tools to teach effectively within the contemporary medical school curriculum.

Assessment of Programs Aimed to Decrease or Prevent Mistreatment of Medical Trainees

IMPORTANCE

Mistreatment of medical students is pervasive and has negative effects on performance, well-being, and patient care.

OBJECTIVE

To document the published programmatic and curricular attempts to decrease the incidence of mistreatment.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and MedEdPORTAL were searched. Comprehensive searches were run on "mistreatment" and "abuse of medical trainees" on all peer-reviewed publications until November 1, 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

Citations were reviewed for descriptions of programs to decrease the incidence of mistreatment in a medical school or hospital with program evaluation data. A mistreatment program was defined as an educational effort to reduce the abuse, mistreatment, harassment, or discrimination of trainees. Studies of the incidence of mistreatment without description of a program, references to a mistreatment program without outcome data, or a program that has never been implemented were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Authors independently reviewed all retrieved citations. Articles that any author found to meet inclusion criteria were included in a full-text review. The data extraction form was developed based on the guidelines for Best Evidence in Medical Education. An assessment of the study quality was conducted using a conceptual framework of 6 elements essential to the reporting of experimental studies in medical education.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

A descriptive review of the interventions and outcomes is presented along with an analysis of the methodological quality of the studies. A separate review of the MedEdPORTAL mistreatment curricula was conducted.

RESULTS

Of 3347 citations identified, 10 studies met inclusion criteria. Of the programs included in the 10 studies, all were implemented in academic medical centers. Seven programs were in the United States, 1 in Canada, 1 in the United Kingdom, and 1 in Australia. The most common format was a combination of lectures, workshops, and seminars over a variable time period. Overall, quality of included studies was low and only 1 study included a conceptual framework. Outcomes were most often limited to participant survey data. The program outcome evaluations consisted primarily of surveys and reports of mistreatment. All of the included studies evaluated participant satisfaction, which was mostly qualitative. Seven studies also included the frequency of mistreatment reports; either surveys to assess perception of the frequency of mistreatment or the frequency of reports via official reporting channels. Five mistreatment program curricula from MedEdPORTAL were also identified; of these, only 2 presented outcome data.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There are very few published programs attempting to address mistreatment of medical trainees. This review identifies a gap in the literature and provides advice for reporting on mistreatment programs.