Combination adjunctive nebulized furosemide and salbutamol versus single agent therapy in COPD patients: A randomized controlled trial

Nebulized medications in the emergency department: A narrative review of nontraditional agents

PURPOSE

This article summarizes emerging nontraditional therapies administered via the nebulization route for use in the emergency department (ED).

SUMMARY

Although traditional routes of medication administration (eg, intravenous) have been the mainstay of administration modalities for decades, these routes may not be appropriate for all patients. Nowhere is this more readily apparent than in the ED setting, where patients with a variety of presentations receive care. One unique route for medication administration that has increasingly gained popularity in the ED is that of aerosolized drug delivery. This route holds promise as direct delivery of medications to the site of action could yield a more rapid and effective therapeutic response while also minimizing systemic adverse effects by utilizing a fraction of the systemic dose. Medication administration via nebulization also provides an alternative that is conducive to rapid, less invasive access, which is advantageous in the emergent setting of the ED. This review is intended to analyze the existing literature regarding this route of administration, including the nuances that can impact drug efficacy, as well as the available literature regarding novel, noncommercial nebulized medication therapy given in the ED.

CONCLUSION

Multiple medications have been investigated for administration via this route, and when implementing any of these therapies several practical considerations must be taken into account, from medication preparation to administration, to ensure optimal efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. The pharmacist is an essential bedside team member in these scenarios to assist with navigating unique and complex nuances of this therapy as they develop.

Nebulised furosemide for the treatment of patients with obstructive lung disease: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive lung diseases (OLDs) such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are major global sources of morbidity and mortality. Current treatments broadly include bronchodilators such as beta agonists/antimuscarinics and anti-inflammatory agents such as steroids. Despite therapy patients still experience exacerbations of their diseases and overall decline over time. Nebulised furosemide may have a novel use in the treatment of OLD. Multiple small studies have shown improvement in pulmonary function as well as dyspnoea. This systematic review will aim to summarise and analyse the existing literature on nebulised furosemide use in OLD to guide treatment and future studies.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will identify all experimental studies using nebulised/inhaled furosemide in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that report any outcome. Databases will include EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ACP Journal Club, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Clinical Answers, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Methodology Register, Health Technology Assessment and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (1995-2015). We will also search ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO-International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Two reviewers will independently determine trial eligibility. For each included trial, we will perform duplicate independent data extraction, risk of bias assessment and evaluation of the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval will not be applicable to this systematic review. The results of the study will be communicated through publication in peer-reviewed journals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021284680.

Drug combinations for inhalation: Current products and future development addressing disease control and patient compliance

Pulmonary delivery is an alternative route of administration with numerous advantages over conventional routes of administration. It provides low enzymatic exposure, fewer systemic side effects, no first-pass metabolism, and concentrated drug amounts at the site of the disease, making it an ideal route for the treatment of pulmonary diseases. Owing to the thin alveolar-capillary barrier, and large surface area that facilitates rapid absorption to the bloodstream in the lung, systemic delivery can be achieved as well. Administration of multiple drugs at one time became urgent to control chronic pulmonary diseases such as asthma and COPD, thus, development of drug combinations was proposed. Administration of medications with variable dosages from different inhalers leads to overburdening the patient and may cause low therapeutic intervention. Therefore, products that contain combined drugs to be delivered via a single inhaler have been developed to improve patient compliance, reduce different dose regimens, achieve higher disease control, and boost therapeutic effectiveness in some cases. This comprehensive review aimed to highlight the growth of drug combinations by inhalation over time, obstacles and challenges, and the possible progress to broaden the current options or to cover new indications in the future. Moreover, various pharmaceutical technologies in terms of formulation and device in correlation with inhaled combinations were discussed in this review. Hence, inhaled combination therapy is driven by the need to maintain and improve the quality of life for patients with chronic respiratory diseases; promoting drug combinations by inhalation to a higher level is a necessity.

Effects of inhaled furosemide on dyspnea and pulmonary function in people with COPD: A literature review

PURPOSE

To determine whether inhaled furosemide can be effectively used in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to improve feelings of dyspnea and improve pulmonary function values.

METHODS

This literature review was conducted using randomized control trials and a literature review in which the participants consisted of or included patients with COPD receiving inhaled furosemide as a potential treatment option for their dyspnea and low pulmonary function values.

RESULTS

Searches in four databases and secondary sources using five key terms yielded 83 unduplicated articles. Ultimately, four studies, one of which was a literature review, were included which studied the short-term result of inhaled furosemide on dyspnea and pulmonary function values. All studies measured dyspnea as an outcome and three found a statistically significant improvement in patient reported symptoms. Pulmonary function values were measured in all studies which all found improvements.

CONCLUSION

The effect of inhaled furosemide on the dyspnea and pulmonary function values in people with COPD remains uncertain, and questions have emerged regarding the long-term impact on these patients. While this therapy is promising for dyspnea relief and improvement of pulmonary function values in people with COPD, further consideration and additional data still need to be gathered.