Airwave oscillometry and patient-reported outcomes in persistent asthma

Airwave oscillometry and spirometry in children with asthma or wheeze

OBJECTIVE

Lung function testing is used in diagnosing asthma and assessing asthma control. Spirometry is most commonly used, but younger children can find performing this test challenging. Non-volitional tests such as airwave oscillometry (AOS) may be helpful in that population. We compared the success of spirometry and AOS in assessing bronchodilator responsiveness in children.

METHODS

AOS was conducted alongside routine lung function testing. Resistance at 5 Hz (R5), the difference between the resistance at 5 and 20 Hz (R5-20) and the area under the reactance curve (AX) were assessed. Patients between 5 and 16 years old attending clinic with wheeze or asthma were assessed. Patients performed AOS, followed by spirometry and were then given 400 µg salbutamol; the tests were repeated 15 minutes later.

RESULTS

Lung function testing was performed in 47 children of whom 46 (98%) and 32 (68%) performed acceptable baseline oscillometry and spirometry, respectively (p < 0.001). Children unable to perform acceptable spirometry were younger (7.35, range: 5.4-10.3 years) than those who could (10.4, range: 5.5-16.9 years), p < 0.001. The baseline z-scores of AOS R5 correlated with FEV₁ (r = 0.499, p = 0.004), FEF₇₅ (r = 0.617, p < 0.001), and FEV₁/FVC (r = 0.618, p < 0.001). There was a positive bronchodilator response assessed by spirometry (change in FEV₁ ≥ 12%) in eight children which corresponded to a change in R5 of 36% (range: 30%-50%) and a change in X5 of 39% (range: 15%-54%).

CONCLUSIONS

Oscillometry is a useful adjunct to spirometry in assessing young asthmatic children's lung function. The degree of airway obstruction, however, might affect the comparability of the results of the two techniques.

Lung disease burden assessment by oscillometry in a systematically disadvantaged urban population experiencing homelessness or at-risk for homelessness in Ottawa, Canada from a prospective observational study

Rationale

Oscillometry is an emerging technique that offers some advantages over spirometry as it does not require forced exhalation and may detect early changes in respiratory pathology. Obstructive lung disease disproportionately impacts people experiencing homelessness with a high symptoms burden, yet oscillometry is not studied in this population.

Objectives

To assess lung disease and symptom burden using oscillometry in people experiencing homelessness or at-risk of homelessness using a community-based participatory action research approach (The Bridge Model™).

Methods

Of 80 recruited, 55 completed baseline oscillometry, 64 completed spirometry, and all completed patient-reported outcomes with demographics, health, and respiratory symptom related questionnaires in the Participatory Research in Ottawa: Management and Point-of-Care for Tobacco Dependence project. Using a two-tail t-test, we compared mean oscillometry values for airway resistance (R_5–20), reactance area under the curve (A_x) and reactance at 5 Hz (X₅) amongst individuals with fixed-ratio method (FEV₁/FVC ratio < 0.70) and LLN (FEV₁/FVC ratio ≤ LLN) spirometry diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We compared mean oscillometry parameters based on participants’ COPD assessment test (CAT) scores using ANOVA test.

Results

There was no significant difference between the pre- and post- bronchodilator values of R_5–20 and A_x for the fixed ratio method (p = 0.63 and 0.43) and the LLN method (p = 0.45 and 0.36). There was a significant difference in all three of the oscillometry parameters, R_5–20, A_x and X₅, based on CAT score (p = 0.009, 0.007 and 0.05, respectively). There was a significant difference in R_5–20 and A_x based on the presence of phlegm (p = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively) and the presence of wheeze (p = 0.05 and 0.01, respectively). Oscillometry data did not correlate with spirometry data, but it was associated with CAT scores and correlated with the presence of self-reported symptoms of phlegm and wheeze in this population.

Conclusions

Oscillometry is associated with respiratory symptom burden and highlights the need for future studies to generate more robust data regarding the use of oscillometry in systematically disadvantaged populations where disease burden is disproportionately higher than the general population.

TrialRegistration: ClinicalTrails.gov—NCT03626064, Retrospective registered: August 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03626064

Small Airways: The “Silent Zone” of 2021 GINA Report?

Asthma is a chronic disease, affecting approximately 350 million people worldwide. Inflammation and remodeling in asthma involve the large airways, and it is now widely accepted that the small airways (those with an internal diameter <2 mm) are involved in the pathogenesis of asthma and are the major determinant of airflow obstruction in this disease. From a clinical perspective, small airways dysfunction (SAD) is associated with more severe bronchial hyperresponsiveness, worse asthma control and more exacerbations. Unlike the GOLD guidelines which, in their definition, identify COPD as a disease of the small airways, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines do not refer to the prevalence and role of SAD in asthmatic patients. This decision seems surprising, given the growing body of compelling evidence accumulating pointing out the high prevalence of SAD in asthmatic patients and the importance of SAD in poor asthma control. Furthermore, and remarkably, SAD appears to possess the characteristics of a treatable pulmonary trait, making it certainly appealing for asthma control optimization and exacerbation rate reduction. In this mini-review article, we address the most recent evidence on the role of SAD on asthma control and critically review the possible inclusion of SAD among treatable pulmonary traits in international guidelines on asthma.

Small airway dysfunction and poor asthma control: a dangerous liaison

Asthma is a common chronic condition, affecting approximately 339 million people worldwide. The main goal of the current asthma treatment guidelines is to achieve clinical control, encompassing both the patient symptoms and limitations and the future risk of adverse asthma outcomes. Despite randomized controlled trials showing that asthma control is an achievable target, a substantial proportion of asthmatics remain poorly controlled in real life. The involvement of peripheral small airways has recently gained greater recognition in asthma, and many studies suggest that the persistent inflammation at these sites leads to small airway dysfunction (SAD), strongly contributing to a worse asthma control. Overall, the impulse oscillometry (IOS), introduced in the recent years, seems to be able to sensitively assess small airways, while conventional spirometry does not. Therefore, IOS may be of great help in characterizing SAD and guiding therapy choice. The aim of this article is to review the literature on SAD and its influence on asthma control, emphasizing the most recent evidence.