Free Hip Arthroplasty Templating Software - Does it Work?

A Novel Digital Templating Method for Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Unilateral Hip Arthrosis

BACKGROUND

Identification of the hip center of rotation (HCOR) before total hip arthroplasty (THA) is crucial for achieving optimal implant position and size, and for restoring native biomechanics around the hip joint. Current techniques for determining the HCOR in cases of abnormal hip anatomy are limited and unreliable. This study presents a novel technique using open-access software for preoperative THA templating for patients with significantly abnormal hip anatomy due to unilateral hip arthrosis. The aim is to reliably predict the HCOR and acetabular implant size compared with a traditional intraoperative method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study involved 20 patients with unilateral hip arthrosis who underwent THA. Preoperative templating was performed using the experimental technique, and the position of the HCOR was measured on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. The positions of the predicted and actual HCOR were compared, along with the inclination and size of the acetabular component.

RESULTS

The difference between the predicted and actual HCOR positions was insignificant (0.43±0.22 mm vertically and 0.18±0.20 mm horizontally), and there was a positive correlation between them (r=0.78, P<.005; r=0.72, P<.005). The agreement between the predicted and actual acetabular implant sizes was 85%, with near-perfect interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa=0.827).

CONCLUSION

This novel technique provides a reliable method for predicting HCOR and acetabular implant size for THA in cases of unilateral hip arthrosis. This technique may help optimize biomechanics and improve outcomes in challenging cases. Further research and validation are warranted to establish its broader applicability. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(3):e139-e145.].

Analyzing the Accuracy of Digital Sizing on Long-Leg Alignment X-rays by Using a 1-Inch Ball Bearing: A Cheap and Effective Method

Background and objective Sizing on digital films is important for implants and planning deformity correction. CT is the most accurate digital measurement method. We use a 1-inch ball bearing (cost: $1) to size our long-leg standing films (LLSFs) when planning deformity correction. In this study, we aimed to assess the accuracy of digital measurements calibrated by this method. Methods We conducted An IRB-approved study involving 25 patients having both an LLSF with a 1-inch ball bearing taped to the inner mid-thigh and a CT scanogram. The longest distance in the axial cut of the bilateral ankle, knee, and femoral heads of the CT images were compared to the same anatomic locations on LLSFs calibrated with the ball bearing using the online digital planning software DetroitBonesetter (DBS) and measurements from our Picture Archiving Communication Software (PACS). Five observers performed each measurement. Results The average measurement differences between the gold standard CT scan and LLSFs calibrated with DBS were as follows: 0.110 ± 0.432 mm (femoral head); 2.173 ± 0.0619 mm (knee); and 3.671 ± 0.30 mm (ankle). In PACS, they were as follows: 5.470 ± 0.381 mm (femoral head); 6.248 ± 0.712 mm (knee); and 1.806 ± 0.548 mm (ankle). The intraclass correlation coefficient for 600 measurements by five observers was 0.972. Conclusions The $1 ball-bearing sizing on DBS using LLSFs provides accuracy to <1 mm for the femoral head, 2 mm at the knee, and 3.7 mm at the ankle. It was significantly better than the PACS system for both the femoral head and knee (<0.001), while PACS was better at the ankle (<0.001).