Same-Day Total Joint Arthroplasty in the United States From 2016 to 2020: The Impact of the Medicare Inpatient Only List and the COVID-19 Pandemic

Driving Forces for Outpatient Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To explore the recent developments and trends in the anesthetic and surgical practices for total hip and total knee arthroplasty and discuss the implications for further outpatient total joint arthroplasty procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Between 2012 and 2017 there was an 18.9% increase in the annual primary total joint arthroplasty volume. Payments to physicians falling by 7.5% (14.9% when adjusted for inflations), whereas hospital reimbursements and charges increased by 0.3% and 18.6%, respectively. Total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty surgeries were removed from the Medicare Inpatient Only in January 2018 and January 2020, respectively leading to same-day TKA surgeries increases from 1.2% in January 2016 to 62.4% by December 2020 Same-day volumes for THA surgery increased from 2% in January 2016 to 54.5% by December 2020. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have revolutionized modern anesthesia and surgery practices. Centers for Medicare Services officially removed total joint arthroplasty from the inpatient only services list, opening a new door for improved cost savings to patients and the healthcare system alike. In the post-COVID healthcare system numerous factors have pushed increasing numbers of total joint arthroplasties into the outpatient, ambulatory surgery center setting. Improved anesthesia and surgical practices in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings have revolutionized pain control, blood loss, and ambulatory status, rendering costly hospital stays obsolete in many cases. As the population ages and more total joint procedures are performed, the door is opening for more orthopedic procedures to exit the inpatient only setting in favor of the ambulatory setting.

Advanced Concepts in Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty

As the adoption and utilization of outpatient total joint arthroplasty continues to grow, key developments have enabled surgeons to safely and effectively perform these surgeries while increasing patient satisfaction and operating room efficiency. Here, the authors will discuss the evidence-based principles that have guided this paradigm shift in joint arthroplasty surgery, as well as practical methods for selecting appropriate candidates and optimizing perioperative care. There will be 5 core efficiency principles reviewed that can be used to improve organizational management, streamline workflow, and overcome barriers in the ambulatory surgery center. Finally, future directions in outpatient surgery at the ASC, including the merits of implementing robot assistance and computer navigation, as well as expanding indications for revision surgeries, will be debated.

The anterior-based muscle-sparing approach is cost-effective when compared with posterolateral and direct anterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Research relating to Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) has found the anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) approach improves both intraoperative and postoperative outcomes when compared to other THA approaches. This study compares the costs and outcomes of the ABMS approach and standard of care (SOC) to determine the relative cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was utilized to estimate intraoperative outcomes (i.e. length of procedure, length of stay (LOS), and transfusion rates) and 90-day postoperative complications (deep infection, periprosthetic fracture, and dislocation). Data relating to postoperative complications, intraoperative outcomes, and costs (adjusted to 2023 USD) were obtained from the literature. Model results were presented as incremental costs and complications avoided using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000. We conducted both one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA), varying each parameter individually within a specific range, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) where parameters were varied simultaneously. In scenario analysis, ABMS was also compared to the posterior approach (PA) and direct anterior approach (DAA) individually.

RESULTS

ABMS THA was found to have superior results compared to SOC THA over a 90-day time horizon since it decreased major complications by 0.00186 per patient and cost by $3,851 per patient. The PSA found the ABMS approach dominates SOC and is cost-effective in approximately 98.29% and 100% of 10,000 iterations, respectively. Comparing ABMS with only PA procedures increased cost savings per patient to $4,766 while it decreased to $3,242 when comparing ABMS to only DAA procedures. Length of procedure, LOS, and discharge disposition were the main cost drivers.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates the ABMS approach for THA is a cost-effective technique when compared to PA and DAA, which may provide an opportunity for cost savings to the healthcare system.