Two-Year Clinical Results of Lateral Collagen Meniscus Implant: A Multicenter Study

Advances in meniscus tissue engineering: Towards bridging the gaps from bench to bedside

Meniscus is vital for maintaining the anatomical and functional integrity of knee. Injuries to meniscus, commonly caused by trauma or degenerative processes, can result in knee joint dysfunction and secondary osteoarthritis, while current conservative and surgical interventions for meniscus injuries bear suboptimal outcomes. In the past decade, there has been a significant focus on advancing meniscus tissue engineering, encompassing isolated scaffold strategies, biological augmentation, physical stimulus, and meniscus organoids, to improve the prognosis of meniscus injuries. Despite noteworthy promising preclinical results, translational gaps and inconsistencies in the therapeutic efficiency between preclinical and clinical studies exist. This review comprehensively outlines the developments in meniscus tissue engineering over the past decade (Scheme 1). Reasons for the discordant results between preclinical and clinical trials, as well as potential strategies to expedite the translation of bench-to-bedside approaches are analyzed and discussed.

Predictors of Long-term Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Collagen Meniscal Implant for Partial Meniscal Defects

Background

Collagen meniscal implant (CMI) is considered an effective procedure for reducing knee pain and improving knee function after previous meniscectomy. Nevertheless, the current knowledge regarding long-term patient reported-outcome measures after CMI is limited.

Purpose

To evaluate clinical outcomes, reoperations, and failures of CMI at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent CMI at a single institution were screened for eligibility. Inclusion criteria for the present study were (1) medial or lateral CMI; (2) isolated or combined procedure with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, knee osteotomy, or cartilage treatment; and (3) follow-up between 10 and 15 years. Demographics and surgical details were obtained via chart review. Patients were asked if they were satisfied with the procedure and were evaluated with the Lysholm score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale for pain, and Tegner score at the final follow-up. Cases requiring partial or total scaffold removal for any reason (including scaffold breakage, infection, or surgery for osteoarthritis progression) were considered surgical failure. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curve, and clinical scores were analyzed based on the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS).

Results

A total of 92 patients (mean age, 42.2 years were included in the analysis. A significant improvement in all clinical scores was reported between the preoperative evaluation and the last follow-up. A chondropathy with Outerbridge grade ≥3 was associated with significantly overall lower clinical scores, while a timing from meniscectomy to CMI of ≥5 years determined more pain at rest and reduced Quality of Life in the KOOS subscale. No significant difference was found in terms of clinical scores between patients undergoing isolated and combined procedures. At the final follow-up, the mean Lysholm score was 76.3 points. In total, 12 cases (13%) were considered surgical failures. Sixteen patients (17%) did not reach PASS for the Lysholm score, with a total of 28 cases (30%) classified as clinical failures. Overall, 19% (KOOS Pain) and 40% (KOOS Symptoms) of patients did not achieve the PASS in the KOOS subscales. Chondropathy with Outerbridge grade ≥3 was associated with a higher risk of not achieving the PASS in all the KOOS subscales, while age at surgery of ≥45 years resulted in a lower risk of not achieving PASS in the Pain subscale. At the last follow-up, 63% of patients were still involved in sports activity, with 41% at the same or higher level. Finally, 80% of the patients were satisfied with the procedure.

Conclusion

Up to 10 years after surgery, around 70% of the patients who underwent CMI reported satisfactory clinical results, with clinical subjective scores still higher compared with the preoperative evaluation. Overall, 30% of cases were considered clinical failures, with 13% considered surgical failures and 17% not meeting the PASS for the Lysholm score. In addition, cartilage status and time from meniscectomy were shown to have a negative impact on the outcomes, while an age ≥45 years was associated with less pain. There was no clinical difference between patients who underwent isolated CMI or combined procedures.

Examining the Evidence Regarding Smoking and Patient Outcomes for Isolated Meniscus Pathology: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Smoking is a well-known cause of impairment in wound healing and postoperative outcomes; however, its effects on treating meniscus issues remain unclear. This study assesses the relationship between smoking and meniscus treatment outcomes. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and CINAHL were searched from inception to 24 December 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies examining smoking's impact on patient outcomes regarding meniscus pathology. A secondary PubMed search targeted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the top ten orthopedic journals focusing on meniscus pathology and smoking as a demographic variable. Meta-analysis of six studies (n = 528) assessed meniscus failure rate based on smoking status. Eighteen observational studies (n = 8353 patients; 53.25% male; mean age: 51.35 ± 11.53 years; follow-up: 184.11 ± 117.34 months) were analyzed, covering meniscus repair, meniscectomy, allograft transplant, conservative care, and arthroscopy. Results showed four studies (36.36%) linked smoking with worse meniscus repair outcomes, while seven studies (63.64%) did not find significant associations. Meta-analysis from six studies showed no significant impact of smoking on repair failure (p = 0.118). Regarding meniscectomy, one study (33.33%) identified a significant association with smoking, but two did not. Only one (3.8%) of the RCTs in leading orthopedic journals included smoking as a factor. The evidence on smoking's effect on meniscus treatment is mixed, necessitating further investigation.

Silk Fibroin/Wool Keratin Composite Scaffold with Hierarchical Fibrous and Porous Structure

The present study describes a silk microfiber reinforced meniscus scaffold (SMRMS) with hierarchical fibrous and porous structure made from silk fibroin (SF) and wool keratin (WK) using electrospinning and freeze-drying technology. This study focuses on the morphology, secondary structure, mechanical properties, and water absorption properties of the scaffold. The cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of SMRMS are assessed in vivo and in vitro. The scaffold shows hierarchical fibrous and porous structure, hierarchical pore size distribution (ranges from 50 to 650 µm), robust mechanical properties (compression strength can reach at 2.8 MPa), and stable biodegradability. A positive growth condition revealed by in vitro cytotoxicity testing indicates that the scaffold is not hazardous to cells. In vivo assessments of biocompatibility reveal that only a mild inflammatory reaction is present in implanted rat tissue. Meniscal scaffold made of SF/WK composite shows a potential application prospect in the meniscal repair engineering field with its development.

Risk Factors Affecting the Survival Rate of Collagen Meniscal Implant for Partial Meniscal Deficiency: An Analysis of 156 Consecutive Cases at a Mean 10 Years of Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Collagen meniscal implant (CMI) is a biologic scaffold that can be used to replace meniscus host tissue after partial meniscectomy. The short-term results of this procedure have already been described; however, little is known about risk factors for failure.

PURPOSE

To determine the factors that predict failure of meniscal scaffold implantation in a large series of patients treated at a single institution and to better define the indications for surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The analysis included 186 consecutive patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up who underwent CMI scaffold implantation or combined procedures. Patients' characteristics and details of the surgery were obtained via chart review. Patients with a Lysholm score <65 were considered to have experienced clinical failure. Surgical failure was defined as partial or total scaffold removal.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 156 patients (84%) at a mean follow-up of 10.9 ± 4.3 years. The patients' mean age at surgery was 42.0 ± 11.1 years, and the survival rate was 87.8%. Subgroup analysis identified Outerbridge grade 3-4 (Hazard ratio [HR], 3.8; P = .004) and a lateral meniscal implant (HR, 3.2; P = .048) as risk factors for failure. The survival rate was 90.4% for medial implants and 77.4% for lateral implants. An Outerbridge grade 3-4 (HR, 2.8; P < .001) and time from meniscectomy to scaffold >10 years (HR, 2.8; P = .020) were predictive of surgical or clinical failure.

CONCLUSION

CMI for partial meniscal deficiency provided good long-term results, with 87.8% of the implants still in situ at a mean 10.9 years of follow-up. Outerbridge grade 3-4, lateral meniscal implants, and longer time from the meniscectomy to implantation of the CMI were identified as risk factors for clinical and surgical failure.

No differences in clinical outcome between CMI and Actifit meniscal scaffolds: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the results of two meniscal scaffolds, CMI and Actifit, for the treatment of partial meniscal lesions.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed on the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases in January 2021, including randomized controlled trails (RCTs) and prospective and retrospective observational studies on the clinical results of meniscal scaffolds. A meta-analysis of the clinical results was performed; the rate of failures was recorded, as well as radiological results. The quality of the included studies was assessed with a modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS).

RESULTS

The search identified 37 studies (31 in the last 10 years): 2 RCTs, 5 comparative studies, 26 prospective and 4 retrospective series on a total of 1276 patients (472 CMI, 804 Actifit). The quality of evidence was generally low. An overall significant improvement in all clinical scores was documented for both scaffolds. The meta-analysis showed no differences between the two scaffolds in terms of patient reported outcome measures and activity level. The meta-analysis on the risk of failures documented a risk of failures of 7% in the CMI and of 9% in the Actifit group.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a growing interest on the results of meniscal scaffolds, with most studies published recently. However, long-term data on the Actifit scaffold and high-level comparative studies are missing. Both CMI and Actifit offered good clinical results with a significant and comparable improvement in symptoms and function, and with a low number of failures over time. Accordingly, with the proper indication, their use may be encouraged in the clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Precision 3D printed meniscus scaffolds to facilitate hMSCs proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation for tissue regeneration

Background

The poor regenerative capability and structural complexity make the reconstruction of meniscus particularly challenging in clinic. 3D printing of polymer scaffolds holds the promise of precisely constructing complex tissue architecture, however the resultant scaffolds usually lack of sufficient bioactivity to effectively generate new tissue.

Results

Herein, 3D printing-based strategy via the cryo-printing technology was employed to fabricate customized polyurethane (PU) porous scaffolds that mimic native meniscus. In order to enhance scaffold bioactivity for human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) culture, scaffold surface modification through the physical absorption of collagen I and fibronectin (FN) were investigated by cell live/dead staining and cell viability assays. The results indicated that coating with fibronectin outperformed coating with collagen I in promoting multiple-aspect stem cell functions, and fibronectin favors long-term culture required for chondrogenesis on scaffolds. In situ chondrogenic differentiation of hMSCs resulted in a time-dependent upregulation of SOX9 and extracellular matrix (ECM) assessed by qRT-PCR analysis, and enhanced deposition of collagen II and aggrecan confirmed by immunostaining and western blot analysis. Gene expression data also revealed 3D porous scaffolds coupled with surface functionalization greatly facilitated chondrogenesis of hMSCs. In addition, the subcutaneous implantation of 3D porous PU scaffolds on SD rats did not induce local inflammation and integrated well with surrounding tissues, suggesting good in vivo biocompatibility.

Conclusions

Overall, this study presents an approach to fabricate biocompatible meniscus constructs that not only recapitulate the architecture and mechanical property of native meniscus, but also have desired bioactivity for hMSCs culture and cartilage regeneration. The generated 3D meniscus-mimicking scaffolds incorporated with hMSCs offer great promise in tissue engineering strategies for meniscus regeneration.

Graphical Abstract

Clinical Replacement Strategies for Meniscus Tissue Deficiency

Meniscus tissue deficiency resulting from primary meniscectomy or meniscectomy after failed repair is a clinical challenge because the meniscus has little to no capacity for regeneration. Loss of meniscus tissue has been associated with early-onset knee osteoarthritis due to an increase in joint contact pressures in meniscectomized knees. Clinically available replacement strategies range from allograft transplantation to synthetic implants, including the collagen meniscus implant, ACTIfit, and NUSurface. Although short-term efficacy has been demonstrated with some of these treatments, factors such as long-term durability, chondroprotective efficacy, and return to sport activities in young patients remain unpredictable. Investigations of cell-based and tissue-engineered strategies to treat meniscus tissue deficiency are ongoing.

Biosynthetic scaffolds for partial meniscal loss: A systematic review from animal models to clinical practice

Acute or degenerative meniscus tears are the most common knee lesions. Meniscectomy provides symptomatic relief and functional recovery only in the short- to mid-term follow-up but significantly increases the risk of osteoarthritis. For this reason, preserving the meniscus is key, although it remains a challenge. Allograft transplants present many disadvantages, so during the last 20 years preclinical and clinical research focused on developing and investigating meniscal scaffolds. The aim of this systematic review was to collect and evaluate all the available evidence on biosynthetic scaffolds for meniscus regeneration both in vivo and in clinical studies. Three databases were searched: 46 in vivo preclinical studies and 30 clinical ones were found. Sixteen natural, 15 synthetic, and 15 hybrid scaffolds were studied in vivo. Among them, only 2 were translated into clinic: the Collagen Meniscus Implant, used in 11 studies, and the polyurethane-based scaffold Actifit®, applied in 19 studies. Although positive outcomes were described in the short- to mid-term, the number of concurrent procedures and the lack of randomized trials are the major limitations of the available clinical literature. Few in vivo studies also combined the use of cells or growth factors, but these augmentation strategies have not been applied in the clinical practice yet. Current solutions offer a significant but incomplete clinical improvement, and the regeneration potential is still unsatisfactory. Building upon the overall positive results of these "old" technologies to address partial meniscal loss, further innovation is urgently needed in this field to provide patients better joint sparing treatment options.

Minimum 10-Year Clinical Outcome of Lateral Collagen Meniscal Implants for the Replacement of Partial Lateral Meniscal Defects: Further Results From a Prospective Multicenter Study

Background:

The collagen meniscal implant (CMI) is a biologic scaffold aimed at replacing partial meniscal defects. The long-term results of lateral meniscal replacement have never been investigated.

Purpose:

To document the clinical outcomes and failures of lateral CMI implantation for partial lateral meniscal defect at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4,

Methods:

This study included 24 consecutive patients who underwent lateral CMI implantation for partial lateral meniscal defects between April 2006 and September 2009 and who were part of a previous study with a 2-year follow-up. Outcome measures at the latest follow-up included the Lysholm score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Tegner activity level, and EuroQol 5-Dimensions score. Data regarding complications and failures were collected, and patients were asked about their satisfaction with the procedure.

Results:

Included in the final analysis were 19 patients (16 male, 3 female) with a mean age at surgery of 37.1 ± 12.6 years and a mean follow-up of 12.4 ± 1.5 years (range, 10-14 years). Five failures (26%) were reported: 1 CMI removal because of implant breakage and 4 joint replacements (2 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties and 2 total knee arthroplasties). The implant survival rate was 96% at 2 years, 85% at 5 years, 85% at 10 years, 77% at 12 years, and 64% at 14 years. Lysholm scores at the final follow-up were rated as “excellent” in 36% (5 of 14 nonfailures), “good” in 43% (6 of 14), and “fair” in 21% (3 of 14). The VAS score was 3.1 ± 3.1, with only 16% (3 of 19 patients) reporting that they were pain-free; the median Tegner score was 3 (interquartile range, 2-5). All clinical scores decreased from the 2-year follow-up; however, with the exception of the Tegner score, they remained significantly higher compared with the preoperative status. Overall, 79% of patients were willing to undergo the same procedure.

Conclusion:

Lateral CMI implantation for partial lateral meniscal defects provided good long-term results, with a 10-year survival rate of 85% and a 14-year survival rate of 64%. At the final follow-up, 58% of the patients had “good” or “excellent” Lysholm scores. However, there was a general decrease in outcome scores between the short- and the long-term follow-up.

Polyurethane scaffold implants for partial meniscus lesions: delayed intervention leads to an inferior outcome

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of the implantation of an aliphatic polyurethane scaffold for the treatment of partial loss of meniscal tissue at a mean follow-up of 36 months.

METHODS

A retrospective review on prospectively collected data was performed on patients who underwent implantation of an aliphatic polyurethane-based synthetic meniscal scaffold. Patients were evaluated for demographics data, lesion and implant characteristics (sizing, type and number of meniscal sutures), previous and combined surgeries and complications. Clinical parameters were rated using NRS, IKDC subjective, Lysholm, KOOS, and Tegner activity score, both preoperatively and at final follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 36 months (48 M and 19 F; mean age 40.8 ± 10.6 years; mean BMI 25.4 ± 4.3). The scaffold was implanted on the medial side in 54 cases, and on the lateral one in 13. Forty-seven patients had undergone previous surgical treatment at the same knee and 45 required combined surgical procedures. All evaluated scores improved significantly from the baseline. Among possible prognostic factors, a delayed scaffold implantation had lower post-operative clinical scores: IKDC subjective (P = 0.049), KOOS Sport (P = 0.044), KOOS total (p = 0.011), and Tegner (P = 0.03) scores at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The polyurethane meniscal scaffold implantation led to a significant clinical benefit in a large number of patients. A delayed intervention correlated with worse results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

MR variability of collagen meniscal implant remodelling in patients with good clinical outcome

PURPOSE

Collagen meniscal implants (CMI) have variable imaging findings on MRI and it remains ambiguous, if alterations may be present in asymptomatic patients. The aim was, to evaluate MR morphological characteristics and volume of CMI in the early, mid- and long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients (mean age, 43.6±11 years; 41 male/16 female) with good clinical outcome (subjective visual analogue scale for satisfaction < 2 and a Lysholm-score ≥ 84) after CMI were assessed retrospectively using MRI 1, 2 and 3-8 years postoperatively. CMI morphology, signal intensity (SI), homogeneity and size were assessed and a meniscal score was calculated. Chondral defects and bone marrow edema pattern were reported and summarized in a chondral score. Meniscal extrusion and volume were evaluated. Intra- and inter-reader reliabilities were calculated. Spearman and partial correlations were used (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

One year postoperatively, the CMI varied in size [10% (4/40) normal, 30% (12/40) small, 60% (24/40) hypertrophic] and was hyperintense and inhomogeneous in all patients. At long-term follow-up, the size of CMI decreased [6% (1/17) resorbed, 18% (3/17) normal, 41% (7/17) small, 35% (6/17) hypertrophic]. The SI of the CMI changed to normal in only 13% (2/16). The majority was still hyperintense [87% (14/16)]. Less meniscal extrusion was present in the follow-up [71% (11/16) versus initially 93% (37/40)]. The meniscal score improved significantly (ρ = 0.28). Over time, full-thickness femoral chondral defects were increasingly present [65% (10/17) versus initially 33% (13/40)] and the chondral score worsened significantly (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Abnormal and inhomogeneous SI and irregular margins of the early postoperative CMI on MRI are findings seen in patients with good clinical results and should not necessarily be overcalled when reporting MRI. These features tend to decrease over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Implantation of an Actifit® Polyurethane Meniscal Scaffold 18 Months After Subtotal Lateral Meniscectomy in a 13-Year-Old Male Adolescent

Patient: Male, 13-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Meniscectomy

Symptoms: Knee joint pain

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Arthroscopy

Specialty: Orthopedics and Traumatology

Meniscal allograft transplants and new scaffolding techniques

Clinical management of meniscal injuries has changed radically in recent years. We have moved from the model of systematic tissue removal (meniscectomy) to understanding the need to preserve the tissue.Based on the increased knowledge of the basic science of meniscal functions and their role in joint homeostasis, meniscus preservation and/or repair, whenever indicated and possible, are currently the guidelines for management.However, when repair is no longer possible or when facing the fact of the previous partial, subtotal or total loss of the meniscus, meniscus replacement has proved its clinical value. Nevertheless, meniscectomy remains amongst the most frequent orthopaedic procedures.Meniscus replacement is currently possible by means of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) which provides replacement of the whole meniscus with or without bone plugs/slots. Partial replacement has been achieved by means of meniscal scaffolds (mainly collagen or polyurethane-based). Despite the favourable clinical outcomes, it is still debatable whether MAT is capable of preventing progression to osteoarthritis. Moreover, current scaffolds have shown some fundamental limitations, such as the fact that the newly formed tissue may be different from the native fibrocartilage of the meniscus.Regenerative tissue engineering strategies have been used in an attempt to provide a new generation of meniscal implants, either for partial or total replacement. The goal is to provide biomaterials (acellular or cell-seeded constructs) which provide the biomechanical properties but also the biological features to replace the loss of native tissue. Moreover, these approaches include possibilities for patient-specific implants of correct size and shape, as well as advanced strategies combining cells, bioactive agents, hydrogels or gene therapy.Herein, the clinical evidence and tips concerning MAT, currently available meniscus scaffolds and future perspectives are discussed. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180103.

Similar clinical outcomes following collagen or polyurethane meniscal scaffold implantation: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the current literature in an effort to assess specific clinical outcomes following meniscal scaffold implantation using the two available scaffolds: Collagen Meniscal Implant (CMI) and the Actifit polyurethane meniscal scaffold.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to find studies evaluating clinical outcomes of patients undergoing meniscal scaffold implantation. Search terms used were "meniscus", "meniscal", "scaffold", and "implant". Studies were evaluated based on scaffold type, treatment failure rates, patient-reported outcome scores, concomitant procedures, and radiological findings. Radiological findings were recorded using the Genovese scale to assess morphology and signal intensity and the Yulish score to assess articular cartilage.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies (1 level I, 1 level II, 17 level IV evidence) were identified that met inclusion criteria, including a total of 658 patients (347 Actifit, 311 CMI). The overall average follow-up was 45 months. Treatment failure occurred in 9.9% of patients receiving the Actifit scaffold at a mean follow-up of 40 months and 6.7% of patients receiving CMI at a mean follow-up of 44 months (n.s.). However, the rate of failure ranged from 0 to 31.8% amongst the included studies with a variable definition of failure. Additionally, overlapping patients and presence of concomitant surgeries such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) may have a significant influence on these results. Outcomes for the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Lysholm knee score, and Tegner activity score improved from preoperatively to latest follow-up in both groups, while the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and International Knee Documentation Committee scores improved from preoperatively to latest follow-up for Actifit scaffold patients. Overall, patients receiving CMI scaffolds had higher grades for Genovese morphology and signal intensity when compared to Actifit scaffold patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing meniscal scaffold implantation with either CMI or Actifit scaffold can both be expected to experience improvement in clinical outcomes when used in association with concomitant procedures such as ACLR and HTO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review.

Cell-Free Strategies for Repair and Regeneration of Meniscus Injuries through the Recruitment of Endogenous Stem/Progenitor Cells

The meniscus plays a vital role in protecting the articular cartilage of the knee joint. The inner two-thirds of the meniscus are avascular, and injuries to this region often fail to heal without intervention. The use of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine techniques may offer novel and effective approaches to repairing meniscal injuries. Meniscal tissue engineering and regenerative medicine typically use one of two techniques, cell-based or cell-free. While numerous cell-based strategies have been applied to repair and regenerate meniscal defects, these techniques possess certain limitations including cellular contamination and an increased risk of disease transmission. Cell-free strategies attempt to repair and regenerate the injured tissues by recruiting endogenous stem/progenitor cells. Cell-free strategies avoid several of the disadvantages of cell-based techniques and, therefore, may have a wider clinical application. This review first compares cell-based to cell-free techniques. Next, it summarizes potential sources for endogenous stem/progenitor cells. Finally, it discusses important recruitment factors for meniscal repair and regeneration. In conclusion, cell-free techniques, which focus on the recruitment of endogenous stem and progenitor cells, are growing in efficacy and may play a critical role in the future of meniscal repair and regeneration.

An electrospun fiber reinforced scaffold promotes total meniscus regeneration in rabbit meniscectomy model

Low vascularization in meniscus limits its regeneration ability after injury, and tissue engineering is the most promising method to achieve meniscus regeneration. In this study, we fabricated a kind of composite scaffold by decellularized meniscus extracellular matrix/polycaprolactone (DMECM/PCL) electrospinning fibers and porous DMECM, in which DMECM/PCL fibers were used as reinforcing component. The tensile modulus of the composite scaffold in longitudinal and crosswise directions were 8.5 ± 1.9 and 2.3 ± 0.3 MPa, respectively. Besides that, the DMECM/PCL electrospinning fibers enhanced suture resistance of the composite scaffold more than 5 times than DMECM scaffold effectively. In vitro cytocompatibility showed that the porous structure provided by DMECM component facilitated meniscus cells' proliferation. DMECM was also the main component to regulate cell behaviors, which promoted meniscus cells expressing extracellular matrix related genes such as COL I, COL II, SOX9 and AGG. Rabbits with total meniscectomy were used as animal model to evaluated the composited scaffolds performance in vivo at 3 and 6 months. Results showed that rabbits with scaffold implanting could regenerate neo-menisci in both time points. The neo-menisci had similar histology structure and biochemical content with native menisci. Although neo-menisci had inferior tensile modulus than native ones, its modulus was improved with implanting time prolonging. MRI imaging showed the signal of neo-meniscus in the body is clear, and X-ray imaging of knee joints demonstrated the implantation of scaffolds could relief joint space narrowing. Moreover, rabbits with neo-menisci had better cartilage condition in femoral condyle and tibial plateau compared than meniscectomy group.

STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE

We fabricated the meniscus scaffold by combining porous decellularized meniscus extracellular matrix (DMECM) and DMECM/PCL electrospinning fibers together, which used the porous structure of DMECM, and the good tensile property of electrospinning fibers. We believe single material cannot satisfy increasing needs of scaffold. Therefore, we combined not only materials but also fabrication methods together to develop scaffold to make good use of each part. DMECM in electrospinning fibers also made these two components possible to be integrated through crosslinking. Compared to existing meniscus scaffold, the composite scaffold had (1) soft structure and extrusion would not happen after implantation, (2) ability to be trimmed to suitable shape during surgery, and (3) good resistance to suture.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Functional Outcomes After a Polyurethane Meniscal Scaffold Implantation: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

PURPOSE

To report the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical outcomes at a minimum 5-year follow-up in a series of patients with postmeniscectomy syndrome and treated with a polyurethane scaffold.

METHODS

All consecutive patients operated on from September 2008 to February 2011 for either persistent medial or lateral joint line compartmental pain receiving a polyurethane scaffold due to a previous partial meniscus resection with a minimum 5-year follow-up were included. Functional scores (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, and Tegner) were assessed preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The state of the scaffold as well as postoperative scaffold extrusion and the total remaining meniscal volume was also evaluated in MRI.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included. The mean follow-up was 70.8 ± 7.5 months. The functionality of the knees improved in all the scores used (P < .001) except for the Tegner score that stayed steady. Most of meniscal implants showed extrusion of 2.4 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.7) were smaller and a hyperintensity signal was seen in the MRI. Three scaffolds were resorbed at the last follow-up. The meniscal volume, determined by MRI, was 1.14 cm³ (95% CI, 0.96-1.31) preoperatively and 1.61 cm³ (95% CI, 1.43-1.7) at the last follow-up. No differences were presented.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a polyurethane meniscal scaffold in patients with a symptomatic meniscus deficit had a good functional outcome at 5 years after surgery. However, the implanted scaffolds did not present normal meniscal tissue with MRI, and the implant volume was considerably less than expected. The fact that most of patients included received different concomitant procedures during scaffold implantation introduces a degree of performance bias into the results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

The Utility of Biologics, Osteotomy, and Cartilage Restoration in the Knee

The management of complex cartilage and meniscal pathology in young, athletic patients is extremely challenging. Joint preservation surgery is most difficult in patients with concomitant knee pathologies, including cartilage defects, meniscal deficiency, malalignment, and/or ligamentous insufficiency. Clinical decision making for these patients is further complicated by articular cartilage lesions, which often are incidental findings; therefore, treatment decisions must be based on the confirmed contribution of articular cartilage lesions to symptomatology. Surgical management of any of the aforementioned knee pathologies that is performed in isolation typically results in acceptable patient outcomes; however, concomitant procedures for the management of concomitant knee pathologies often are essential to the success of any single procedure. The use of biologic therapy as an alternative to or to augment more conventional surgical management has increased in popularity in the past decade, and indications for biologic therapy continue to evolve. Orthopaedic surgeons should understand knee joint preservation techniques, including biologic and reconstructive approaches in young, high-demand patients.

Fabrication and characterization of electrospun nanofibers composed of decellularized meniscus extracellular matrix and polycaprolactone for meniscus tissue engineering

Decellularized meniscus extracellular matrix (DMECM) and polycaprolactone (PCL) were electrospun into nanofibers to make meniscus scaffolds with good mechanical properties.

Histological and biological comparisons between complete and incomplete discoid lateral meniscus

The discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is an anatomically abnormal meniscus that covers a greater area of the tibial plateau than the normal meniscus. The DLM is classified into two types: complete (CDLM) and incomplete (ICDLM) types. In this study, we investigated the histological and cell biological characteristics of CDLM and ICDLM. The number of blood vessels, proteoglycan deposition, and collagen distribution were assessed using meniscal tissues. Collagen production was also investigated in CDLM and ICDLM cells. The intercondylar region of the CDLM had a higher number of blood vessels than the inner region of the ICDLM. Safranin O staining density and type II collagen deposition in ICDLM were higher than those in CDLM. Type II collagen-positive cells were higher in ICLDM than in CDLM. CDLM cells showed slender fibroblastic morphology, while ICDLM cells were triangular chondrocytic in shape. This study demonstrated that the intercondylar region of the CDLM showed similar properties to the outer region of the meniscus. The inner region of the ICDLM, on the other hand, differed from the intercondylar region of the CDLM. Our results suggest that the intercondylar region of the CDLM may have a high healing potential like the outer meniscus.

Is Sport Activity Possible After Arthroscopic Meniscal Allograft Transplantation? Midterm Results in Active Patients

BACKGROUND

Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has produced good to excellent results in the general population; however, few investigations have examined MAT in athletes and sport-related outcomes.

PURPOSE

To report midterm clinical outcomes of MAT and the rate of return to sport in a physically active population.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The study included all physically active patients who underwent arthroscopic MAT without bone plugs and had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up at a single institution. Clinical evaluation was performed with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Tegner activity scale, and a 0- to 100-point subjective scale for knee function and satisfaction. Outcomes evaluated included ability to return to sport, time to return to sport, level of sport activity upon return compared with preinjury level, and level of decrease in sport participation or reasons for not returning to sport participation. Comparisons were made between patients who did or did not return to sport and between patients who returned to the same level or a decreased level. Regression analysis was performed to determine the variables affecting the outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients, whose mean ± SD age at surgery was 38.5 ± 11.2 years, were evaluated to a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 1.9 years. Total KOOS improved from a mean ± SD of 39.5 ± 18.5 preoperatively to 84.7 ± 14.8 at the latest follow-up (P < .001). The Tegner score improved significantly from a median of 2 (interquartile range [IQR], 1-4) preoperatively to a median of 4 (IQR, 3-6) at the latest follow-up (P < .001), although it did not reach the preinjury level of 6 (IQR, 5-7) (P < .001). Older age at surgery was correlated with the worst clinical results. Sixty-six patients (74%) were able to return to sport after 8.6 ± 4.1 months. Forty-four (49%) returned to the same level as preinjury. Patients who did not return to sport activity and those who reduced their activity level at follow-up had inferior subjective outcomes compared with those who returned to sport and those who returned to their preinjury levels, respectively. Only 11 patients (12%) underwent a surgical procedure during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic MAT without bone plugs improved knee function and reduced pain, allowing sport resumption in 74% of patients and return to the preinjury activity level in 49% of patients at midterm follow-up. Of all the demographic and surgical variables, only age at surgery seemed to affect outcomes.