Editorial Commentary: Is Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Knee Needed? The Debate Rages on

Clinical outcomes of contemporary lateral augmentation techniques in primary ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this investigation was to systematically review the contemporary literature to determine if a lateral augmentation (LA) added to an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) provides better clinical and patient reported outcomes compared to an isolated ACLR.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Two authors independently conducted an electronic search using MEDLINE® and Embase® on February 6^th, 2021 for level I-III randomized controlled trials (RCT) and prospective cohort studies without randomization, published after 2012 and with a minimum of two year follow-up. Publications were included when they reported on the objective knee stability examination, patient reported outcome scores, return to sports or graft rupture rate of any type of primary, isolated ACLR compared to ACLR combined with any type of LA.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies that reported on a combined total of 1892 unique patients were eligible for data extraction, including five RCTs and six prospective cohort studies. In 6 studies, an Anterolateral Ligament reconstruction (ALLR) was the LA of choice, while the 5 other publications used different types of Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis (LET). A significant reduction in graft ruptures was found in patients treated with ACLR + LA (3%) compared to isolated ACLR (12%). Rotational laxity was significantly higher in isolated ACLR (14%) compared to ACLR + LA (6%). Addition of a LA reduced anterior translation when assessed via instrumented laxity testing. No significant difference was found in the patient reported outcome scores (IKDC and Tegner) between both patient groups, except for the Lysholm Score which was significant in favour of the ACLR + LA group.

CONCLUSION

Combination of a primary ACLR with a LA can significantly reduce the risk of graft rupture and provide better rotatory stability, without jeopardizing patient reported outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Systematic Review of Level I, II and III studies.

Editorial Commentary: This Is the Way: Extra-Articular Augmentation Is an Essential Consideration in Contemporary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery

Since the rediscovery of the anterolateral ligament, extra-articular augmentation (EA) has evolved from controversial to an essential consideration in contemporary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis are 2 common methods. Indications among early adopters pioneering anterolateral ligament reconstruction at anterior cruciate ligament surgery included revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) case, chronic ACL tear, high-grade pivot shift, and patients with hyperlax, hypermobile knees. Newer indications include young patient age, pivoting sport/high-demand/high-risk athlete, and concurrent medial meniscus repair. Questions remain regarding best practices as indications continue to evolve regarding technique, graft choice, angle/position of reconstruction fixation, and whether EA should be reconstructed routinely. This fast-moving surgical evolution serves as a reminder of 2 key concepts; first, that anterior cruciate ligament tears occur more fundamentally in the setting of anterolateral rotatory instability, in which concurrent soft tissue injuries are common, and, second, that even our best "anatomic" reconstructions do not fully recapitulate the native ACL, both of which give impetus to reconstructing the ALL.

Correlation Between the Thickness of Anterolateral Ligament and Lateral Collateral Ligament of the Knee

Background

Persistent anterolateral rotatory instability (ALRI) following the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has led to a renewed interest in defining the role of anterolateral complex (ALC) of the knee.

Methods

We explored the anterolateral corner of 34 cadaveric knees to define the anterolateral ligament (ALL) in all its dimensions and measured the thickness of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) at the lateral meniscus level (tLCL) in ALL-intact and ALL-deficient knees.

Results

ALL was present in 27/34 (79%) of the knees. We found complete ALL in 13 cadavers bilaterally. ALL was absent bilaterally in three cadavers; it was present on one side and absent contralaterally in one cadaver. In ALL-intact knees, the average tLCL was 2.05 mm, whereas, in ALL-deficient knees, it was 2.57 mm. This difference in tLCL was statistically significant.

Conclusions

Our study adds new data to the recent voluminous research on ALL. We have examined the correlation between the thickness of ALL and LCL and documented alterations in the thickness of LCL in ALL-intact knees. These findings would help in designing reconstructive procedures for the combined ACL injury with ALRI.

Truly Existing or Hyped up? Unravelling the Current Knowledge Regarding the Anatomy, Radiology, Histology and Biomechanics of the Enigmatic Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee Joint

Ever since its description, anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee joint remains as the hotspot of controversies. Though it has been described under various descriptions, the structure gained its limelight when it was christened as anterolateral ligament by Claes in 2013. The main reason for the controversies around it is the lack of concrete evidences regarding its attachments, morphology, biomechanical aspects and radiological appearance. Similarly the role of ALL in pivot shift phenomenon also remains as a point of debate. The advocates of ALL suggest that because of its ability to modulate internal rotation and attachment to the lateral meniscus, ALL contributes to the pivot shift phenomenon. Similarly, the orientation of ALL stands as the reason for varied documentation with respect to imaging techniques. With the growing body of evidence, it is imperative to fix our stand regarding the structure because, if found to be morphologically persistent, it can be used for concomitant anterolateral stabilization along with anterior cruciate ligament reinforcement surgeries. The present review tries to systematically review the anatomy, variations in classifications, descriptions, histology, radiology and biomechanical features of ALL. At the end of the review, we would like to find the answer for the question: Is ALL a distinct ligamentous structure located at the anterolateral aspect of the knee? What is the contribution of it to the tibial internal rotation stability?

Recent Issues in Musculoskeletal Anatomy Research and Correlation with MRI

MRI 영상은 관절 내 질환의 평가에 중요한 검사기법이며, 관절 MRI 영상의 해석을 위해선 견고한 해부학적 지식이 바탕이 되어야 한다. 관절의 해부학 분야에서는, 새로운 구조물이 발견되기도 하며, 과거에 보고되었으나 기능을 알지 못하던 구조물이 새롭게 주목을 받기도 한다. 본 종설에서는 최근 십여 년간 활발하게 연구되어온 견관절 회전근개 케이블(rotator cable) 및 상관절막(superior capsule), 슬관절의 후외측(posterolateral corner) 및 전외측 인대 복합(anterolateral ligament complex), 발목관절의 원위부 경비골 인대결합(distal tibiofibular syndesmosis) 등의 최근 연구 결과를 소개하고, 이를 MRI 영상을 통해 확인해 보았다.