Efficacy and safety of adding alirocumab to rosuvastatin versus adding ezetimibe or doubling the rosuvastatin dose in high cardiovascular-risk patients: The ODYSSEY OPTIONS II randomized trial

Effects of Alirocumab and Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Mortality and LDL-C: Stratified According to the Baseline LDL-C Levels

Background

A meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether the cardiovascular mortality and lipid-lowering effects of alirocumab and evolocumab are influenced by various baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels.

Methods

We searched for literature published before June 2023. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included adults treated with alirocumab or evolocumab and reported LDL-C changes and cardiovascular deaths. The primary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality and percent changes in LDL-C from baseline.

Results

Forty-one RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Evolocumab did not significantly affect the outcome of cardiovascular mortality whether the baseline data were greater than 100 mg/dL or less than 100 mg/dL. However, the stratified result showed that alirocumab decreased the risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with a baseline LDL-C level of ≥100 mg/dL (relative risk (RR) 0.45; 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.92; p = 0.03). In terms of lipid-lowering efficacy, alirocumab (mean difference (MD) -56.62%; 95% CI: -60.70% to -52.54%; p < 0.001) and evolocumab (MD -68.10%; 95% CI: -74.85% to -61.36%; p < 0.001) yielded the highest percentage reduction in LDL-C level when baseline levels were 70-100 mg/dL, while the smallest reduction in alirocumab (MD -37.26%; 95% CI: -44.06% to -30.46%; p < 0.001) and evolocumab (MD -37.55%; 95% CI: -40.47% to -34.63%; p < 0.001) occurred with baseline LDL-C levels of ≥160 mg/dL.

Conclusions

Alirocumab and evolocumab presented a better lipid-lowering effect when the baseline LDL-C levels were <100 mg/dL. Alirocumab was associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality at baseline LDL-C levels of ≥100 mg/dL. This finding can have significant implications for the development of personalized drug therapy.

The PROSPERO Registration

CRD42023446723, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023446723.

Impact of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors on Lipoprotein(a): A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk.

Objectives

The authors examined the effect of monoclonal antibody proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9is) on plasma Lp(a) levels across multiple trials.

Methods

Studies were retrieved comparing the effect of PCSK9i vs placebo on Lp(a) levels. The primary outcome was percent change in Lp(a) levels. Factors associated with the treatment effect were determined by meta-regression analysis. Subgroup analyses were done to explore potential treatment effect differences.

Results

PCSK9i reduced Lp(a) levels on average of -27% (95% CI: -29.8% to -24.1%, P < 0.001). Factors associated with the treatment effect included mean percent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.003, beta coefficient 0.34, 95% CI: 0.11-0.57, tau2 = 94.8, R2 = 11.82) and apolipoprotein B (P < 0.002, beta coefficient 0.4, 95% CI: 0.14-0.64, tau2 = 93.68, R2 = 11.86). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent treatment effect amongst comparators vs placebo: -27.69% (95% CI: -30.85% to -24.54%, P < 0.001), vs ezetimibe: -24.0% (95% CI: -29.95% to -18.01%, P < 0.001), type of PCSK9i, evolocumab: -29.35% (95% CI: -33.56% to -25.14%, P < 0.001) vs alirocumab: -24.50% (95% CI: -27.96% to -21.04%, P < 0.001), and presence of familial hypercholesterolemia: -25.63% (95% CI: -31.96% to -19.30%, P < 0.001 vs no familial hypercholesterolemia: -27.22%; 95% CI: -30.34% to -24.09%, P < 0.001). Varying treatment effects were noted in the duration of treatment (12 weeks or shorter: -32.43% [95% CI: -36.63% to -28.23% vs >12 weeks: -22.31%] [95% CI: -25.13% to -19.49%, P < 0.001]), P interaction < 0.01.

Conclusions

PCSK9is reduce Lp(a) levels by an average of 27%. Mean percent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B were associated with treatment effect.

PCSK9 inhibitor added to high-intensity statin therapy to prevent cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter SHAWN study

BACKGROUND

It is currently uncertain whether the combination of a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor and high-intensity statin treatment can effectively reduce cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for culprit lesions.

METHODS

This study protocol describes a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study aiming to investigate the efficacy and safety of combining a PCSK9 inhibitor with high-intensity statin therapy in patients with ACS following PCI. A total of 1,212 patients with ACS and multiple lesions will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either PCSK9 inhibitor plus high-intensity statin therapy or high-intensity statin monotherapy. The randomization process will be stratified by sites, diabetes, initial presentation and use of stable (≥4 weeks) statin treatment at presentation. PCSK 9 inhibitor or its placebo is injected within 4 hours after PCI for the culprit lesion. The primary endpoint is the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, re-hospitalization due to ACS or heart failure, or any ischemia-driven coronary revascularization at 1-year follow-up between 2 groups. Safety endpoints mean PCSK 9 inhibitor and statin intolerance.

CONCLUSION

The SHAWN study has been specifically designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adding a PCSK9 inhibitor to high-intensity statin therapy in patients who have experienced ACS following PCI. The primary objective of this study is to generate new evidence regarding the potential benefits of combining a PCSK9 inhibitor with high-intensity statin treatment in reducing cardiovascular events among these patients.

Quantitative assessment of baseline imbalances in evolocumab and alirocumab trials: a meta-epidemiological study

BACKGROUND

Baseline imbalances have been identified in randomized trials of evolocumab and alirocumab. Our aim was to quantitatively assess (1) the presence of systematic baseline differences, and (2) the relationship of baseline differences with effects on low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) and clinical outcomes in the trials.

METHODS

We performed a meta-epidemiological study. PubMed, Embase, regulatory reports, ClinicalTrials.gov and company websites were searched for trials. Seven baseline characteristics (mean age, LDL-c, BMI, percentage males, diabetics, smokers, and hypertensives) and five outcomes (LDL-c, major adverse cardiac events, serious adverse events, any adverse events, all-cause mortality) were extracted. We calculated (1) range and distribution of baseline imbalances (sign-test), (2) pooled baseline differences and heterogeneity (meta-analysis), (3) differences in SDs around continuous variables (sign-test and pooling), and (4) the relationship of baseline differences with outcomes (meta-regression). The comparisons of PCSK9-inhibitor groups with either placebo or ezetimibe were analysed separately and combined.

RESULTS

We identified 43 trials with 63,193 participants. Baseline characteristics were frequently missing. Many trials showed small baseline imbalances, but some large imbalances. Only baseline BMI showed a statistically significant lower pooled mean for the drug versus placebo groups (MD -0.16; 95% CI -0.24 to -0.09). Heterogeneity in baseline imbalances was present in six placebo- and five ezetimibe-comparisons. Heterogeneity was statistically significant for BMI, males, diabetics and hypertensives in the combined comparisons. There was a statistically significant preponderance for larger SDs in the PCSK9-inhibitor versus control groups (sign-test age 0.014; LDL-c 0.014; BMI 0.049). Meta-regression showed clinically relevant relationships of baseline imbalances in age, BMI and diabetics with the risk of any adverse events and the risk of mortality. Two relationships were statistically significant: A higher mean BMI in the drug versus control group with a decreased risk of mortality (beta - 0.56; 95% CI -1.10 to -0.02), and a higher proportion of diabetics with an increased risk of any adverse events (beta 0.02; 95% 0.01 to 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Heterogeneous baseline imbalances and systematically different SDs were present in evolocumab and alirocumab trials, so study groups cannot be assumed to be comparable. These findings raise concerns about the design and conduct of the randomization procedures.

The Essence of Lipoproteins in Cardiovascular Health and Diseases Treated by Photodynamic Therapy

Lipids, together with lipoprotein particles, are the cause of atherosclerosis, which is a pathology of the cardiovascular system. In addition, it affects inflammatory processes and affects the vessels and heart. In pharmaceutical answer to this, statins are considered a first-stage treatment method to block cholesterol synthesis. Many times, additional drugs are also used with this method to lower lipid concentrations in order to achieve certain values of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Recent advances in photodynamic therapy (PDT) as a new cancer treatment have gained the therapy much attention as a minimally invasive and highly selective method. Photodynamic therapy has been proven more effective than chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy alone in numerous studies. Consequently, photodynamic therapy research has expanded in many fields of medicine due to its increased therapeutic effects and reduced side effects. Currently, PDT is the most commonly used therapy for treating age-related macular degeneration, as well as inflammatory diseases, and skin infections. The effectiveness of photodynamic therapy against a number of pathogens has also been demonstrated in various studies. Also, PDT has been used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis and hyperplasia of the arterial intima. This review evaluates the effectiveness and usefulness of photodynamic therapy in cardiovascular diseases. According to the analysis, photodynamic therapy is a promising approach for treating cardiovascular diseases and may lead to new clinical trials and management standards. Our review addresses the used therapeutic strategies and also describes new therapeutic strategies to reduce the cardiovascular burden that is induced by lipids.

A review on the efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering drugs in neurodegenerative disease

There is a train of thought that lipid therapies may delay or limit the impact of neuronal loss and poor patient outcomes of neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs). A variety of medicines including lipid lowering modifiers (LLMs) are prescribed in NDDs. This paper summarizes the findings of clinical and observational trials including systematic reviews and meta-analyses relating to LLM use in NDDs published in the last 15 years thus providing an up-to-date evidence pool. Three databases were searched PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science using key terms relating to the review question. The findings confirm the benefit of LLMs in hyperlipidemic patients with or without cardiovascular risk factors due to their pleotropic effects. In NDDs LLMs are proposed to delay disease onset and slow the rate of progression. Clinical observations show that LLMs protect neurons from α-synuclein, tau, and Aβ toxicity, activation of inflammatory processes, and ultimately oxidative injury. Moreover, current meta-analyses and clinical trials indicated low rates of adverse events with LLMs when used as monotherapy. LLMs appear to have favorable safety and tolerability profiles with few patients stopping treatment due to severe adverse effects. Our collated evidence thus concludes that LLMs have a role in NDDs but further work is needed to understand the exact mechanism of action and reach more robust conclusions on where and when it is appropriate to use LLMs in NDDs in the clinic.

PCSK-9 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have been approved to treat dyslipidaemia. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the most efficient PCSK9 therapies that target PCSK9 for secondary prevention in subjects at high risk for cardiovascular (CV) events. Thus, this study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-PCSK9 antibodies in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A comprehensive review of the available literature was done to identify RCTs that compared the use of PCSK9 inhibitors coupled with placebo or ezetimibe for the secondary prevention of CV events in patients on statin-background therapy. All-cause mortality was the major efficacy endpoint, while severe adverse events were the key safety outcome. A random effects model was used, and data were presented as risk ratio (RR) or risk difference with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The heterogeneity of the publications was determined using Cochran's Q test, and publication bias was visually examined using funnel plots. All the chosen studies' quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Checklists for Studies created by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Forty-one studies (76,304 patients: 49,086 on evolocumab, and 27,218 on alirocumab) were included, and their years of publication spanned from 2010 to 2023. Overall, no significant differences were observed in CV and all-cause mortality between PCSK9 inhibitors and controls. However, alirocumab use was linked to a reduced risk of all-cause death compared to control, but not evolocumab. Each of the drugs, evolocumab and alirocumab, significantly reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke. In comparison to the control therapy, the risk of major detrimental sequelae was significantly reduced by alirocumab therapy in the subgroup analysis of each PCSK9 inhibitor, whereas evolocumab treatment did not demonstrate significant differences (RR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.72-1.04; evolocumab: RR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.87-1.11). Both evolocumab and alirocumab are well-tolerated, safe medications that significantly lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels.

Dyslipidemia in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: An Updated Overview

Dyslipidemia is a potentially modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. Whereas the recommendations for the treatment target of dyslipidemia in the general population are being more and more rigorous, the 2013 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes clinical practice guideline for lipid management in chronic kidney disease (CKD) presented a relatively conservative approach with respect to the indication of lipid lowering therapy and therapeutic monitoring among the patients with CKD. This may be largely attributed to the lack of high-quality evidence derived from CKD population, among whom the overall feature of dyslipidemia is considerably distinctive to that of general population. In this review article, we cover the characteristic features of dyslipidemia and impact of dyslipidemia on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD. We also review the current evidence on lipid lowering therapy to modify the risk of cardiovascular events in this population. We finally discuss the association between dyslipidemia and CKD progression and the potential strategy to delay the progression of CKD in relation to lipid lowering therapy.

Effect of Different Types and Dosages of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors on Lipoprotein(a) Levels: A Network Meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has become an important component of the residual risk of cardiovascular diseases. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors display promising effects in controlling Lp(a) levels. However, the effects of different types and dosages of PCSK9 inhibitors on Lp(a) have not been studied in detail. These include 2 monoclonal antibodies, alirocumab and evolocumab, and inclisiran, a small interfering RNA. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials to investigate the efficacy of PCSK9 inhibitors at the Lp(a) level. Although changes in Lp(a) levels were not the primary endpoint in any of these studies, they all described these valuable data. Forty-one randomized controlled trials with 17,601 participants were included, involving 23 unduplicated interventions. Most PCSK9 inhibitors significantly reduced Lp(a) levels compared with placebo. The pairwise comparison demonstrated no significant difference among most PCSK9 inhibitors. However, in the comparison among different dosages of alirocumab, the dosage of 150 mg Q2W showed a significant reduction in Lp(a) levels compared with the dosages of 150, 200, and 300 mg Q4W. In addition, the comparison results demonstrated the significant efficacy of evolocumab 140 mg Q2W compared with alirocumab at a dosage of 150 mg Q4W. The cumulative rank probabilities demonstrated that evolocumab 140 mg Q2W showed the highest efficacy. This study showed that PCSK9 inhibitors reduced Lp(a) levels by up to 25.1%. A biweekly dose of either 140 mg evolocumab or 150 mg alirocumab was the best treatment option. However, the reduction in Lp(a) levels with a single kind of PCSK9 inhibitor alone did not demonstrate sufficient clinical benefit. Therefore, for patients with very high Lp(a) levels who remain at high residual risk in the context of statin administration, it may be acceptable to use a kind of PCSK9 inhibitor, but the clinical benefit needs further investigation.

Soluble PCSK9 Inhibition: Indications, Clinical Impact, New Molecular Insights and Practical Approach-Where Do We Stand?

Current research on cardiovascular prevention predominantly focuses on risk-stratification and management of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) to optimize their prognosis. Several basic, translational and clinical research efforts aim to determine the etiological mechanisms underlying CAD pathogenesis and to identify lifestyle-dependent metabolic risk factors or genetic and epigenetic parameters responsible for CAD occurrence and/or progression. A log-linear association between the absolute exposure of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and the risk of atherosclerotic cardio-vascular disease (ASCVD) was well documented over the year. LDL-C was identified as the principal enemy to fight against, and soluble proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) was attributed the role of a powerful regulator of blood LDL-C levels. The two currently available antibodies (alirocumab and evolocumab) against PCSK9 are fully human engineered IgG that bind to soluble PCSK9 and avoid its interaction with the LDLR. As documented by modern and dedicated "game-changer" trials, antibodies against soluble PCSK9 reduce LDL-C levels by at least 60 percent when used alone and up to 85 percent when used in combination with high-intensity statins and/or other hypolipidemic therapies, including ezetimibe. Their clinical indications are well established, but new areas of use are advocated. Several clues suggest that regulation of PCSK9 represents a cornerstone of cardiovascular prevention, partly because of some pleiotropic effects attributed to these newly developed drugs. New mechanisms of PCSK9 regulation are being explored, and further efforts need to be put in place to reach patients with these new therapies. The aim of this manuscript is to perform a narrative review of the literature on soluble PCSK9 inhibitor drugs, with a focus on their indications and clinical impact.

Bempedoic Acid for Lipid Management in the Indian Population: An Expert Opinion

Lipid-lowering is a central theme in the management of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), with statins being currently used as the first-line lipid-lowering agent (LLAs). Bempedoic acid (BA) has been recently approved for lipid management in ASCVD/HeFH patients. This expert opinion paper brings out the essential concept to assess the current place of BA in the Indian population. Here we highlight that the majority of the patients with clinical ASCVD may not be receiving the optimal dose of statin, thereby failing to achieve their lipid targets. The addition of BA to statin results in a significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) along with substantial reductions in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels. For patients who do not achieve LDL-C targets, BA can be an effective add-on alternative to choose among non-statin LLAs. BA is a good choice for statin-intolerant cases, especially in combination with ezetimibe. Given the lack of effect of worsening hyperglycemia or any increase in the occurrence of new-onset diabetes, BA can be used without hesitation in patients with diabetes. The small risk of hyperuricemia could be mitigated with appropriate patient selection and monitoring of serum uric acid levels in patients at high risk of hyperuricemia. We believe BA is an excellent non-statin therapy that is efficacious, well-tolerated, and cost-effective for lipid management in ASCVD, HeFH, and statin-intolerant patients in India.

An Updated Meta-Analysis for Safety Evaluation of Alirocumab and Evolocumab as PCSK9 Inhibitors

Background

Alirocumab and evolocumab, as protein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, have been reported to reduce cardiovascular risk. This meta-analysis is aimed at updating the safety data of PCSK9 inhibitors.

Methods

We assessed the relative risk for all treatment-related adverse events, serious adverse events, diabetes-related adverse events, and neurocognitive and neurologic adverse events with PCSK9 inhibitors compared to controls (placebo or ezetimibe). In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively integrate and estimate the adverse event rates in long-term studies.

Results

There were no significant differences between PCSK9 inhibitors and controls in the relative risk analysis. In a subgroup analysis of each PCSK9 inhibitor, alirocumab treatment significantly reduced the risk of serious adverse events compared to control treatment (risk ratio (RR) = 0.937; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.896-0.980), but no significant difference was observed with evolocumab treatment (RR = 1.003; 95% CI, 0.963-1.054). Moreover, alirocumab treatment afforded a significant reduction in the risk of diabetes-related adverse events compared to control treatment (RR = 0.9137; 95% CI, 0.845-0.987). The overall incidence (event rate) of long-term adverse events was 75.1% (95% CI, 71.2%-78.7%), and the incidence of serious long-term event rate was 16.2% (95% CI, 11.6%-22.3%).

Conclusions

We suggest that alirocumab and evolocumab are generally safe and well tolerated and that their addition to background lipid-lowering therapy is not associated with an increased risk of adverse events or toxicity.

Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Evaluating the Comparative Efficacy of Lipid-Lowering Therapies Added to Maximally Tolerated Statins for the Reduction of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Background Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels decreases major cardiovascular events and is recommended for patients at elevated cardiovascular risk. However, appropriate doses of statin therapy are often insufficient to reduce LDL-C in accordance with current guidelines. In such cases, treatment could be supplemented with nonstatin lipid-lowering therapy. Methods and Results A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis were conducted on randomized controlled trials of nonstatin lipid-lowering therapy added to maximally tolerated statins, including statin-intolerant patients. The primary objective was to assess relative efficacy of nonstatin lipid-lowering therapy in reducing LDL-C levels at week 12. Secondary objectives included the following: LDL-C level reduction at week 24 and change in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B at week 12. There were 48 randomized controlled trials included in the primary network meta-analysis. All nonstatin agents significantly reduced LDL-C from baseline versus placebo, regardless of background therapy. At week 12, evolocumab, 140 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W)/420 mg once a month, and alirocumab, 150 mg Q2W, were the most efficacious regimens, followed by alirocumab, 75 mg Q2W, alirocumab, 300 mg once a month, inclisiran, bempedoic acid/ezetimibe fixed-dose combination, and ezetimibe and bempedoic acid used as monotherapies. Primary end point results were generally consistent at week 24, and for other lipid end points at week 12. Conclusions Evolocumab, 140 mg Q2W/420 mg once a month, and alirocumab, 150 mg Q2W, were consistently the most efficacious nonstatin regimens when added to maximally tolerated statins to lower LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels and facilitate attainment of guideline-recommended risk-stratified lipoprotein levels.

PCSK9 Inhibitors in the Management of Cardiovascular Risk: A Practical Guidance

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are potent medications in the toolkit for treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. These agents have been well studied in clinical trials supporting their efficacy in dramatically reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and impact on cardiovascular outcomes. Since the approval of commercial use for PCSK9 inhibitors in 2015, we have also gained significant experience in the use of these therapeutics in the real-world setting. In this article, we review current guideline recommendations, clinical trial evidence on efficacy and safety as well as data on cost-effectiveness, prescription and adherence. We focus primarily on the monoclonal antibody class of PCSK9 inhibitors in this review while also touching on other types of therapeutics that are under development.

Comparative efficacy of non-statin lipid-lowering therapies in patients with hypercholesterolemia at increased cardiovascular risk: a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Network meta-analysis was used to derive estimates of the relative efficacy of inclisiran, evolocumab, alirocumab, bempedoic acid, and ezetimibe in patients with hypercholesterolemia and/or at increased cardiovascular risk due to elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol taking maximum tolerated dose statins.

METHODS

Clinical trials published through February 2021 comparing percent change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were identified via a systematic review. Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and/or high cardiovascular risk on maximally tolerated statins in the base case, which included 23 trials.

RESULTS

Results from the base-case analyses demonstrated that inclisiran, evolocumab, and alirocumab provide superior efficacy over placebo, bempedoic acid, and ezetimibe in terms of reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Inclisiran was also comparable to alirocumab (mean difference: 0.78% [95% CrI: -8.35, 9.88]) and evolocumab (8.16%, [95% CrI: -1.82, 18.49]). Findings of a scenario which also included trials conducted in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia were consistent with the base case. There was evidence of statistical heterogeneity across the included trials, roughly equivalent to variation of 5-10% change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, suggesting that any differences between treatments that were greater than 5-10% are generalizable.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insight regarding the comparative efficacy of drugs for which no head-to-head trials exist and suggests that inclisiran, alirocumab, and evolocumab are expected to provide similar clinically meaningful improvements in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with hypercholesterolemia on maximally tolerated statins who are at increased cardiovascular risk.

Effect of PCSK9 Inhibitor on Blood Lipid Levels in Patients with High and Very-High CVD Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives

We aimed to investigate the effects of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor on blood lipid levels in patients with high and very-high cardiovascular risk.

Design

14 trials (n = 52,586 patients) comparing treatment with or without PCSK9 inhibitors were retrieved from PubMed and Embase updated to 1st Jun 2021. The data quality of included studies was assessed by two independent researchers using the Cochrane systematic review method. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and changes in serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), lipoprotein (a) (LP (a)), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) from baseline were analyzed using Rev Man 5.1.0 software.

Results

Compared with treatments without PCSK9 inhibitor, addition of PCSK9 inhibitors (evolocumab and alirocumab) had obvious decreasing effects on the levels of LDL-C [MD = −46.86, 95% CI (−54.99 to −38.72), P < 0.00001], TC [MD = −31.92, 95% CI (−39.47 to −24.38), P < 0.00001], TG [MD = −8.13, 95% CI (−10.48 to −5.79), P < 0.00001], LP(a) [MD = −26.69, 95% CI (-27.93 to −25.44), P < 0.00001], non-HDL-C [MD = −42.86, 95% CI (−45.81 to −39.92), P < 0.00001], and ApoB [MD = −38.44, 95% CI (−42.23 to -34.65), P < 0.00001] in high CVD risk patients. Conversely, changes of HDL-C [MD = 6.27, CI (5.17 to 7.36), P < 0.00001] and ApoA1 [MD = 4.33, 95% CI (3.53 to 5.13), P < 0.00001] from baseline were significantly more in high cardiovascular disease risk patients who received PCSK9 inhibitors treatment.

Conclusion

Addition of PCSK9 inhibitors to standard therapy resulted in definite improvement in blood lipid levels compared with therapies that did not include them.

Efficacy and Safety of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors as Adjuvant Treatments for Patients with Hypercholesterolemia Treated with Statin: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Background: The proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are potent LDL-C lowering agents. However, few head-to-head studies evaluated the efficacy on the lowering in other atherogenic apolipoproteins and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors at different dosages as an add-on statins therapy in hypercholesterolemia patients.

Methods: This study is a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized control trials to compare the efficacy of lipid reduction and adverse events of PCSK9 inhibitors in statin-treated hypercholesterolemia patients. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched till April 20, 2021, for randomized controlled trials. Random-effect network meta-analyses were undertaken to compare the differences in the percent reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels and the risk of AEs among different PCSK9 inhibitors.

Results: A total of 22 articles with 42,786 patients were included. The lipid reductions in LDL-C, ApoB, and Lp(a) with add-on PCSK9 inhibitors vs. placebo in statin-treated patients across all trials were 50–63%, 43–52%, and 23–31%, respectively. Evolocumab 140 mg Q2W was ranked the best among all treatment strategies for lowering LDL-C, ApoB, and Lp(a) levels, and the treatment difference was 68.05% (95% confidence interval (CI), 62.43% to 73.67) in LDL-C reduction, 54.95% (95% CI, 49.55% to 60.35%) in ApoB reduction, and 34.25% (95% CI, 27.59% to 40.91%) in Lp(a) reduction compared with the placebo. No significant risk difference of adverse events between PCSK9 inhibitors and placebo was found.

Conclusion: PCSK9 inhibitors showed a significant effect on the reduction in LDL-C, ApoB, and Lp(a) levels in statin-treated patients. Evolocumab 140 mg Q2W showed significantly larger degrees of LDL-C, ApoB, and Lp(a) reduction.

Acanthaster planci Inhibits PCSK9 Gene Expression via Peroxisome Proliferator Response Element (PPRE) and Activation of MEK and PKC Signaling Pathways in Human Liver Cells

A constantly elevated level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is mainly associated with the development of atherosclerosis. The use of statins as a treatment for reducing plasma LDL-C levels has led, in some cases, to adverse side effects, including a decrease in hepatic LDL receptor (LDLR), the receptor responsible for the uptake of circulating LDL-C. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is an enzyme responsible for directing the LDLR–LDL-C complex to lysosomal degradation upon transport into cells, preventing the recycling of LDLR to the cell surface. Therefore, PCSK9 may offer a new target for reducing the levels of plasma LDL-C. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms of action of a selected fraction of A. planci on PCSK9 gene expression, as well as the effect of the fraction on the level of LDLR protein and the uptake of LDL-C. Using real-time PCR, it was shown that the selected A. planci fraction reduced the gene expression of PCSK9 in human liver HepG2 cells. Immunocytochemistry analysis demonstrated that the selected A. planci fraction increased the LDLR protein level and LDL-C uptake in HepG2 cells. Promoter mutational and gene expression analyses revealed that PPRE, a binding site for peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR), was responsible for mediating the inhibitory effect of the selected fraction on PCSK9 mRNA. In addition, MAP kinase and PKC components of the signal transduction pathway were activated, inducing the action of the selected A. planci fraction in decreasing PCSK9 gene expression. These findings suggest that the selected fraction shows good potential for reducing circulating LDL-C and, thus, may be a good therapeutic intervention to prevent the progression of atherosclerosis.

Efficacy and Safety of PCSK9 Inhibitors in Stroke Prevention

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) interacts with the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor and, by enhancing its degradation, has a pivotal role in the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Two fully humanized monoclonal antibodies targeting PCSK9, evolocumab and alirocumab, are available for clinical use. PCSK9 inhibitors reduce LDL-C 30% more than ezetimibe and 60% more than placebo when added to statins. This reduction in LDL-C is accompanied by a decrease in the risk of major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. However, questions have been raised in relation to the cost-effectiveness of these medications. In this article, we review the clinical evidence on the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in lowering LDL-C and their effect on cerebrovascular health.

Discordant responses of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) to alirocumab: A pooled analysis from 10 ODYSSEY Phase 3 studies

AIMS

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors consistently reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 50-60% and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) by 20-30%, but the mechanism of Lp(a) lowering remains unclear. If Lp(a) is cleared by the LDL receptor, similar to LDL-C, then one would expect PCSK9 inhibition to induce a concordant LDL-C/Lp(a) response in an approximately 2:1 ratio. We aim to determine the prevalence of discordant plasma LDL-C/Lp(a) response to the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab.

METHODS

This is a post hoc, pooled analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials from the ODYSSEY Phase 3 clinical trial program for alirocumab. Patients enrolled in the trials were high cardiovascular risk and/or with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. The primary end point was prevalence of discordant LDL-C/Lp(a) response to alirocumab at 24 weeks. Discordant response was defined as LDL-C reduction >35% and Lp(a) reduction ≤10%, or LDL-C reduction ≤35% and Lp(a) reduction >10%.

RESULTS

Of the 1709 patients in the pooled study cohort, 62.4% were male, and the mean age was 59.2 (SD: 11.0) years. Baseline mean LDL-C was 126.5 (SD: 46.3) mg/dL and baseline median Lp(a) was 46.9 (interquartile range: 21.8-89.0) mg/dL. Total prevalence of discordant LDL-C/Lp(a) response was 21.5% (12.6% with LDL-C >35% reduction and Lp(a) ≤10% reduction; 8.9% with LDL-C ≤35% reduction and Lp(a) >10% reduction). Baseline Lp(a) and familial hypercholesterolemia status did not affect discordance.

CONCLUSION

A high prevalence of discordant LDL-C/Lp(a) response was observed with alirocumab, further suggesting that PCSK9 inhibitor therapy with alirocumab reduces plasma Lp(a) through alternative pathways to LDL receptor clearance.

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Disease: Impact on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the western world. Hypolipidemic drugs have long been used for the primary and secondary prevention of heart disease. However, the high frequency of recurrent events in patients despite hypolipidemic therapy has increased the need for new more targeted therapeutic approaches. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies to the PCSK9 gene and represent a new class of drugs that have been shown to further decrease LDL-C when administered as a monotherapy or in combination with statins. In addition to LDL reduction, PCSK9 inhibitors are shown to decrease apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein (a) levels without major adverse effects. Whether or not PCSK9 inhibitors can actually reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events and ameliorate CVD prognosis is yet to be clarified. This review summarizes recent literature on the safety and efficacy of PCSK9 inhibitors on CVD outcome and its potential role in the management of patients with high-risk cardiovascular disease.

Alirocumab treatment and neurocognitive function according to the CANTAB scale in patients at increased cardiovascular risk: A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Trials of the fully human monoclonal antibody proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9) alirocumab in hypercholesterolemia demonstrated substantial low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering, reduction in cardiovascular (CV) events and outcomes, and a generally acceptable safety and tolerability profile. The impact of maintaining low LDL-C levels on higher order brain function is unclear, with reports of neurocognitive disorders with other lipid-lowering therapies.

METHODS

Patients (n = 2176) with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) or non-FH, at high or very-high CV risk despite maximally tolerated statin therapy, randomly received subcutaneous alirocumab 75/150 mg or placebo every 2 weeks in this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The primary outcome was prospectively evaluated every 24 weeks over 96 weeks by Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB).

RESULTS

Among 2086 patients with CANTAB cognitive domain Spatial Working Memory Strategy (SWMS) assessments, change from baseline to Week 96 in SWMS z-score (primary outcome) achieved noninferiority between alirocumab and placebo (least squares [LS] mean change at Week 96, -0.180 vs -0.200; LS mean difference vs placebo [95% confidence interval]: -0.020 [-0.094 to 0.055], p = 0.6055). Exploratory outcome measures, which further assessed neurocognitive function in the CANTAB domains, did not differ significantly over 96 weeks and achieved nominal noninferiority between treatment groups. Alirocumab resulted in nominally significant reductions in LDL-C and other lipid parameters, and was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Confirming previous PCSK9 inhibitor data, alirocumab showed no effect on neurocognitive function over 96 weeks' treatment, substantially reduced LDL-C and was generally well tolerated in patients with HeFH or non-FH at high or very-high CV risk.

Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing PCSK9 monoclonal antibody versus ezetimibe/placebo in patients at high cardiovascular risk

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9 mAbs) reduce circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by controlling the expression of LDL-receptor on the surface of hepatocytes. This meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the efficacy of PCSK9 mAbs on clinical and lipid-lowering outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception until November 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared PCSK9 mAbs with ezetimibe or placebo in patients at high cardiovascular risk.

RESULTS

Twenty eight RCTs with a total of 89,115 participants were included. Compared with placebo, PCSK9 mAbs significantly reduced the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.88, p < 0.00001). However, no difference was observed in occurring MACEs between PCSK9 mAbs and ezetimibe (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.20, p = 0.20). Secondary analyses show that PCSK9 mAbs were not superior to ezetimibe in preventing stroke (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.69, p = 0.20), myocardial infarction (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.90, p = 0.88), and cardiovascular death (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.43, p = 0.17). Compared with placebo, PCSK9 mAbs significantly reduced the incidence of stroke (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.86, p < 0.0001) and myocardial infarction (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.87, p < 0.00001), but not the risk of cardiovascular death (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.07, p = 0.45). As for lipid-lowering efficacy, PCSK9 mAbs markedly reduced percent change of LDL-C from baseline to week 12 and 24 compared to ezetimibe or placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients at high cardiovascular risk, PCSK9 mAbs could effectively reduce MACEs, stroke, and myocardial infarction compared with placebo. However, PCSK9 mAbs were not superior to ezetimibe in preventing adverse cardiovascular events in our study; RCTs with long-term follow-up and cardiovascular events as the research endpoint are still needed.

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and the risk for neurocognitive adverse events: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that lipid lowering therapy causes impaired cognitive changes. The association between the use of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and the risk of neurocognitive adverse events remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to assess neurocognitive safety of PCSK9 inhibitors in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The research was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Cochrane library were searched through September 2019. Selection criteria included RCTs that addressed to neurocognitive adverse events of participants using Alirocumab, Evolocumab or Bococizumab, with a follow up duration of at least 6 months. The search results were screened by two independent reviewers. Safety data from included papers were extracted. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool results, and meta-regression was utilized when applicable. Twenty-one studies were included. Among 59,733 patients, 31,611 were treated with PCSK9 inhibitors. The follow-up period ranged from 24 weeks to 48 months. No significant difference in the incidence of neurocognitive adverse effects between the groups was identified (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86-1.19, I² = 3%). Similar results were seen in subgroup analysis for each of the medications (alirocumab- RR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72-1.08, I² = 0%, evolocumab- RR = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.74-2.73, I² = 55%). A meta-regression analysis for evolocumab revealed that prolonged study duration was associated with decreased risk for neurocognitive adverse events (β_week = -0.0037, p-value = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Pooled results of our meta-analysis and meta-regression show that exposure to PCSK9 inhibitors is not associated with an increased risk of neurocognitive adverse effects.

Cost-Effectiveness of Alirocumab for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events after Myocardial Infarction in the Chinese Setting

Background: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab reduce ischemic events; however, the cost-effectiveness remains uncertain. This study sought to evaluate its economic value in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) from the Chinese healthcare perspective.

Methods: A state-transition Markov model was developed to determine the cost-effectiveness of alirocumab for preventing recurrent MI, ischemic stroke and death. Preventative effect of the therapy was gathered from ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial and absolute reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in ODYSSEY EAST trial, respectively. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.

Results: Compared with statin monotherapy, the ICER of alirocumab therapy at its present discounted price [34,355 Chinese yuan (CNY) annually, 33% rebate] based on clinical follow-up efficacy was 1,613,997 CNY per QALY gained. A willingness-to-pay threshold of 212,676 CNY per QALY would be achieved when the annual cost of alirocumab was reduced by 88% from the full official price to 6071 CNY. The therapeutic effect evaluation estimated by the magnitude of LDL-C reduction was superior to the results of clinical follow-up, but this medication was still far from cost-effective. Multiple vulnerable subgroup analyses demonstrated that the ICER for patients with polyvascular disease in 3 vascular beds was 111,750 CNY per QALY gained.

Conclusion: Alirocumab is not cost-effective in general MI population based on current discounted price. High long-term costs of alirocumab may be offset by health benefit in patients with polyvascular disease (3 beds).

Lipoprotein(a): a genetic marker for cardiovascular disease and target for emerging therapies

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an established cardiovascular risk factor, and growing evidence indicates its causal association with atherosclerotic disease because of the proatherogenic low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like properties and the prothrombotic plasminogen-like activity of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. As genetics significantly influences its plasma concentration, Lp(a) is considered an inherited risk factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), especially in young individuals. Moreover, it has been suggested that elevated Lp(a) may significantly contribute to residual cardiovascular risk in patients with coronary artery disease and optimal LDL-C levels. Nonetheless, the fascinating hypothesis that lowering Lp(a) could reduce the risk of cardiovascular events - in primary or secondary prevention - still needs to be demonstrated by randomized clinical trials. To date, no specific Lp(a)-lowering agent has been approved for reducing the lipoprotein levels, and current lipid-lowering drugs have limited effects. In the future, emerging therapies targeting Lp(a) may offer the possibility to further investigate the relation between Lp(a) levels and cardiovascular outcomes in randomized controlled trials, ultimately leading to a new era in cardiovascular prevention. In this review, we aim to provide an updated overview of current evidence on Lp(a) as well as currently investigated therapeutic strategies that specifically address the reduction of the lipoprotein.

Lipoprotein(a) Reduction With Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a cardiovascular factor, for which there is no approved specific lowering treatment. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have been shown to have lowering effects on Lp(a). Aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the current literature and quantify the effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on the serum Lp(a) levels in human subjects. Double-blind, phase 2 or 3, randomized-controlled trials comparing PCSK9 inhibitors (alirocumab or evolocumab) to placebo and/or ezetimibe and/or other lipid-lowering therapy were deemed eligible for inclusion. We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science as of 17 June 2020. Quality assessment was performed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Forty-three studies were identified (64,107 patients randomized) and 41 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. PCSK9 inhibitors reduced Lp(a) levels by -26.7% (95% CI, -29.5% to -23.9%) with a significant heterogeneity within studies. There was significant difference in Lp(a) change from baseline according to comparator (placebo: mean -27.9%; 95% CI, -31.1% to -24.6% vs. ezetimibe: mean, -22.2%; 95% CI, -27.2% to -17.2%; P = 0.04) and duration of treatment (≤12 weeks: mean, -30.9%; 95% CI, -34.7% to -27.1% vs. >12 weeks: mean, -21.9%; 95% CI, -25.2% to -18.6%; P < 0.01). Meta-regression analysis showed that only the mean percentage change from baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol due to the intervention is significantly associated with the effect size difference (P < 0.0001). PCSK9 inhibitors reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by -54% (95% CI -57.6% to -50.6%). There is substantial efficacy of the currently approved PCSK9 inhibitors in the lowering of Lp(a) levels. Dedicated randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the benefit of this intervention.

Effect of Ezetimibe Added to High-Intensity Statin Therapy on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Adding ezetimibe to high-intensity statin therapy is used for additional lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C); however, there are little data on the efficacy of ezetimibe when combined with a high-intensity statin. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of ezetimibe added to high-intensity statin therapy on LDL-C levels.

Methods

A literature search from database inception to May 2020 was performed using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used in this meta-analysis, in which the random-effects model was adopted for the calculation of the mean difference (MD). The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias was used to evaluate the quality of the included trials.

Results

A total of 14 trials with 2,007 patients were included in this study. Compared to the high-intensity statin monotherapy, the MD in LDL-C reduction with high-intensity statin therapy plus ezetimibe was -14.00% (95% confidence interval: -17.78 to -10.22; P < 0.001) with a moderate degree of heterogeneity (P < 0.001, I² = 66%). No significant publication bias among the included trials was identified.

Conclusions

Our study found that adding ezetimibe to high-intensity statin therapy provided a significant but attenuated incremental reduction in LDL-C levels. Whether the magnitude of this additional lowering of LDL-C levels would lead to benefits in clinical cardiovascular outcomes needs further investigation.

microRNA-483 ameliorates hypercholesterolemia by inhibiting PCSK9 production

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) affects cholesterol homeostasis by targeting hepatic LDL receptor (LDLR) for lysosomal degradation. Clinically, PCSK9 inhibitors effectively reduce LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and the incidence of cardiovascular events. Because microRNAs (miRs) are integral regulators of cholesterol homeostasis, we investigated the involvement of miR-483 in regulating LDL-C metabolism. Using in silico analysis, we predicted that miR-483-5p targets the 3′-UTR of PCSK9 mRNA. In HepG2 cells, miR-483-5p targeted the PCSK9 3′-UTR, leading to decreased PCSK9 protein and mRNA expression, increased LDLR expression, and enhanced LDL-C uptake. In hyperlipidemic mice and humans, serum levels of total cholesterol and LDL-C were inversely correlated with miR-483-5p levels. In mice, hepatic miR-483 overexpression increased LDLR levels by targeting Pcsk9, with a significant reduction in plasma total cholesterol and LDL-C levels. Mechanistically, the cholesterol-lowering effect of miR-483-5p was significant in mice receiving AAV8 PCSK9-3′-UTR but not Ldlr-knockout mice or mice receiving AAV8 PCSK9-3′-UTR (ΔBS) with the miR-483-5p targeting site deleted. Thus, exogenously administered miR-483 or similarly optimized compounds have potential to ameliorate hypercholesterolemia.

MicroRNA-483 targeting 3’ untranslated region of PCSK9 mRNA inhibits hepatic PCSK9 expression, resulting in increased LDLR expression and LDL uptake, which ameliorates hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis.

Lipid Management in Patients with Endocrine Disorders: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline

OBJECTIVE

This guideline will provide the practicing endocrinologist with an approach to the assessment and treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with endocrine diseases, with the objective of preventing cardiovascular (CV) events and triglyceride-induced pancreatitis. The guideline reviews data on dyslipidemia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in patients with endocrine disorders and discusses the evidence for the correction of dyslipidemia by treatment of the endocrine disease. The guideline also addresses whether treatment of the endocrine disease reduces ASCVD risk.

CONCLUSION

This guideline focuses on lipid and lipoprotein abnormalities associated with endocrine diseases, including diabetes mellitus, and whether treatment of the endocrine disorder improves not only the lipid abnormalities, but also CV outcomes. Based on the available evidence, recommendations are made for the assessment and management of dyslipidemia in patients with endocrine diseases.

Combined use of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe improves hepatic steatosis in patients with dyslipidemia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe are beneficial for the management of dyslipidemia. We investigated whether rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe improves hepatic steatosis in patients with dyslipidemia.

METHODS

Between January and August 2018, 114 patients with dyslipidemia treated for 6 months with rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. The degree of hepatic steatosis was assessed using the hepatic steatosis index (HSI). Hepatic steatosis improvement and presence of fatty liver were defined as a ≥5% reduction in HSI score and HSI ≥36, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population (50 males and 64 females) was 57.4 years. At baseline, the mean BMI total cholesterol level, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, triglyceride level, and HSI were 25.1 kg/m, 207.4 mg/dL, 126.1 mg/dL, 52.9 mg/dL, 146.4 mg/dL, and 36.1, respectively. During the 6-month treatment, hepatic steatosis burden was constant (mean HSI = 36.3 and 36.4 at 3 and 6 months, respectively). On multivariate analyses, ultrasonographic fatty liver and HSI ≥36 were selected as independent predictors of hepatic steatosis improvement. However, when 53 (46.5%) patients with fatty liver (HSI ≥ 36) were selected, hepatic steatosis burden was significantly improved (mean HSI = 40.8, 39.3, and 39.7 at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe for the management of dyslipidemia did not improve hepatic steatosis burden in all patients with dyslipidemia, but it improved hepatic steatosis burden in the subgroup with fatty liver.

Lipid-lowering Drugs and Neurocognitive Function: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND/AIM

Lipid-lowering drugs have been suggested to affect neurocognitive function. This review aimed to give the latest evidence on the way these agents affect neurocognitive function based on clinical trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search concerning original studies from 2015 to 2020 was performed through the databases PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane, according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The trials enrolled numerous patients and were conducted in different areas of the world. The terms used are cholesterol, lipid-lowering drugs, statins and cognitive function.

RESULTS

Eleven randomized trials met the inclusion criteria. The trials included patients suffering from cardiovascular conditions. In particular, patients with coronary heart disease, coronary heart disease risk equivalents and hypercholesterolemia were tested. The trials included evolocumab, alirocumab, statin, ezetimibe or placebo.

CONCLUSION

Lipid-lowering drugs seem to have no significant effect on neurocognitive function, but further research specifically focused on this matter is needed.

PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of effective drug therapies that reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C), cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains an important cause of mortality and morbidity. Therefore, additional LDL-C reduction may be warranted, especially for people who are unresponsive to, or unable to take, existing LDL-C-reducing therapies. By inhibiting the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) enzyme, monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9 inhibitors) reduce LDL-C and CVD risk.

OBJECTIVES

Primary To quantify the effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on CVD, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke, compared to placebo or active treatment(s) for primary and secondary prevention. Secondary To quantify the safety of PCSK9 inhibitors, with specific focus on the incidence of influenza, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and cancer, compared to placebo or active treatment(s) for primary and secondary prevention.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified studies by systematically searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science in December 2019. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform in August 2020 and screened the reference lists of included studies. This is an update of the review first published in 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All parallel-group and factorial randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a follow-up of at least 24 weeks were eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed and extracted data. Where data were available, we calculated pooled effect estimates. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence and in 'Summary of findings' tables.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 24 studies with data on 60,997 participants. Eighteen trials randomised participants to alirocumab and six to evolocumab. All participants received background lipid-lowering treatment or lifestyle counselling. Six alirocumab studies used  an active treatment comparison group (the remaining used placebo), compared to three evolocumab active comparison trials. Alirocumab compared with placebo decreased the risk of CVD events, with an absolute risk difference (RD) of -2% (odds ratio (OR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 0.94; 10 studies, 23,868 participants; high-certainty evidence), decreased the risk of mortality (RD -1%; OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.96; 12 studies, 24,797 participants; high-certainty evidence), and MI (RD -2%; OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94; 9 studies, 23,352 participants; high-certainty evidence) and for any stroke (RD 0%; OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.91; 8 studies, 22,835 participants; high-certainty evidence). Compared to active treatment the alirocumab effects, for CVD, the RD was 1% (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.87; 3 studies, 1379 participants; low-certainty evidence); for mortality, RD was -1% (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.40; 5 studies, 1333 participants; low-certainty evidence); for MI, RD was 1% (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.64 to 3.28, 5 studies, 1734 participants; low-certainty evidence); and for any stroke, RD was less than 1% (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.13 to 5.61; 5 studies, 1734 participants; low-certainty evidence). Compared to placebo the evolocumab, for CVD, the RD was -2% (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.91; 3 studies, 29,432 participants; high-certainty evidence); for mortality, RD was less than 1% (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.19; 3 studies, 29,432 participants; high-certainty evidence); for MI, RD was -1% (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.82; 3 studies, 29,432 participants; high-certainty evidence); and for any stroke RD was less than -1% (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.94; 2 studies, 28,531 participants; high-certainty evidence).  Compared to active treatment, the evolocumab effects, for any CVD event RD was less than -1% (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.14 to 3.04; 1 study, 218 participants; very low-certainty evidence); for all-cause mortality, the RD was less than 1% (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.30; 3 studies, 5223 participants; very low-certainty evidence); and for MI, RD was less than 1% (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.85; 3 studies, 5003 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There were insufficient data on any stroke.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for the clinical endpoint effects of  evolocumab and alirocumab were graded as high. There is a strong evidence base to prescribe PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies to people who might not be eligible for other lipid-lowering drugs, or to people who cannot meet their lipid goals on more traditional therapies, which was the main patient population of the available trials.  The evidence base of PCSK9 inhibitors compared with active treatment is much weaker (low very- to low-certainty evidence) and it is unclear whether evolocumab or alirocumab might be effectively used as replacement therapies. Related, most of the available studies preferentially enrolled people with either established CVD or at a high risk already, and evidence in low- to medium-risk settings is minimal. Finally, there is very limited evidence on any potential safety issues of both evolocumab and alirocumab. While the current evidence synthesis does not reveal any adverse signals, neither does it provide evidence against such signals. This suggests careful consideration of alternative lipid lowering treatments before prescribing PCSK9 inhibitors.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibition in cardiovascular disease: current status and future perspectives

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) targets the degradation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors; it has been proved that its inhibition improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Herein, we review the current status of PCSK9 inhibitors in clinical practice and the future scope of PCSK9 inhibition. The results of two recent large clinical trials reveal that two PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies evolocumab and alirocumab reduce the risk of a cardiovascular event on top of background statin therapy in patients with stable ASCVD and those with recent acute coronary syndrome, respectively. However, there are several ongoing concerns regarding the efficacy in reducing mortality, cost-effectiveness, and long-term safety of extremely low LDL cholesterol levels with PCSK9 inhibition. The results of ongoing cardiovascular outcomes trials with PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for primary prevention and with small interfering RNA to PCSK9 for secondary prevention may help to shape the use of this new therapeutic class.

Efficacy and safety of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies: an evidence-based review and update

Objective

Treatment of dyslipidemia lowers cardiovascular (CV) risk. Although statin use is a cornerstone therapy, many patients are not achieving their risk-specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. The proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies have been extensively studied as lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Herein, we present an updated evidence-based review of the efficacy and safety of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of familial and non-familial hypercholesterolemia.

Methods

PubMed database was searched to review Phase III studies on PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies. Then, the US National Institutes of Health Registry and the WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform were searched to identify and present the ongoing research.

Results

PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies were investigated for the treatment of dyslipidemia, as a single therapeutic agent or as an add-on therapy to the traditional LLT. They proved effective and safe in the treatment of familial and non-familial hypercholesterolemia, and in the prevention of adverse CV events.

Conclusions

The use of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of dyslipidemia is currently recommended to achieve risk-specific LDL-C goal to reduce adverse CV events. Future results of the ongoing research might expand their clinical generalizability to broader patient populations.

Impact of Lowering Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol with Contemporary Lipid-Lowering Medicines on Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential association between the lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with contemporary lipid-lowering medicines and cognitive function.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science and all databases in the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were collected from inception to January 1, 2020. The cognitive function of patients receiving proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, statins and ezetimibe was evaluated using meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 2910 studies were obtained from databases and other sources. Thirty-three studies were selected by screening, including 11 studies on alirocumab, 9 studies on evolocumab, 11 studies on statins and 2 studies on ezetimibe. In our study, a total of 128,691 patients with no cognitive impairment were divided into an intervention group (66,330 patients) and a control group (62,361 patients). The data were subjected to a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model for meta-analysis. The contemporary lipid-lowering medicines significantly reduced LDL-C in terms of both percentage (WMD: -45.06%, 95% CI -50.12% to -40.00%, P < 0.001) and absolute value (WMD: -64.01 mg/dL, 95% CI -72.25 to -55.78, P < 0.001). Compared with the control group, patients receiving treatment with contemporary lipid-lowering medicines did not show a significant difference in the rate of neurocognitive disorder (RR: 1.02, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.16, I² = 0.0%, p = 0.696). Subgroup analysis was performed according to the intervention and LDL-C stratification. The result of this subgroup analysis was consistent with the main findings. Regarding global cognitive performance, no difference in major cognition was found among the pooled data (SMD: 0.02, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.04, P = 0.002), except for psychomotor speed (SMD: 0.09, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.16, P = 0.0024).

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary lipid-lowering medicines were not associated with cognitive impairment in RCTs. A low LDL-C level did not influence the incidence of cognitive disorder or global cognitive performance.

Safety of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Monoclonal Antibodies in Regard to Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Evidence shows a positive association between the use of statins and new-onset diabetes. There is, however, contradictory evidence as to whether a similar association exists for the use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9-mAbs) in regard to incident diabetes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Randomized controlled trials that reported data on the incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus or the worsening of pre-existing diabetes were searched, and risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the endpoints. Twenty-three studies including 65,957 participants were identified. Compared with controls, PCSK9-mAb treatment was not associated with the adverse event of diabetes (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91-1.02; p = 0.22). When we analysed the trials in terms of PCSK9-mAb type, alirocumab was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of diabetes (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.98; p = 0.01), whereas no significant reduction was observed in participants receiving evolocumab or bococizumab. Interestingly, compared with ezetimibe, which was actively used as lipid-modifying therapy in the control group, PCSK9-mAbs seem to have a lower risk of incident diabetes (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.99; p = 0.04). This meta-analysis also revealed a noticeable increase in the risk of incident diabetes in the evolocumab and alirocumab pool (RR 2.14, 95% CI 1.12-4.07; p = 0.02) when the use of statins was equivalent between the experimental and active comparator arms.

CONCLUSION

Compared with placebo or any other comparator, PCSK9-mAb treatment was not associated with the adverse event of diabetes. However, evolocumab and alirocumab show high risk of incident diabetes when there is no interference from unbalanced use of statins. The imbalance in background lipid modifying therapy or different comparators used in the control arms of the studies might have masked the effect of PCSK9-mAb therapy on diabetes.

Modern Lipid Management: A Literature Review

Pro-protein convertase subtilisin/Kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are relatively new, non-statin, lipid-lowering drugs that reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 60%. PCSK9 inhibitors reduce the blood concentrations of cholesterol by the degradation of LDL receptors, which subsequently extracts cholesterol from cells. This leads to cardiovascular risk reduction in various at-risk populations, including atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Despite their promise for advanced lipid-lowering ability, cost-effectiveness is a barrier to their routine use. While searching PubMed, we extracted land-mark trials on two of the anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies, alirocumab and evolocumab. When combined with statins or ezetimibe, they show an exponential fall in LDL-C levels, helping achieve target values in high-risk populations and decreasing cardiovascular adverse events. Ongoing research is exploring the long-term efficacy of these antibodies in established coronary artery disease and familial hypercholesterolemia with more prospects for this novel lipid-lowering therapy.

Association of Lowering Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol With Contemporary Lipid-Lowering Therapies and Risk of Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The relationship between lowering LDL (low‐density lipoprotein) cholesterol with contemporary lipid‐lowering therapies and incident diabetes mellitus (DM) remains uncertain.

Methods and Results

Thirty‐three randomized controlled trials (21 of statins, 12 of PCSK9 [proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9] inhibitors, and 0 of ezetimibe) were selected using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception through November 15, 2018). A total of 163 688 nondiabetic patients were randomly assigned to more intensive (83 123 patients) or less intensive (80 565 patients) lipid‐lowering therapy. More intensive lipid‐lowering therapy was defined as the more potent pharmacological strategy (PCSK9 inhibitors, higher intensity statins, or statins), whereas less intensive therapy corresponded to active control group or placebo/usual care of the trial. Metaregression and meta‐analyses were conducted using a random‐effects model. No significant association was noted between 1‐mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol and incident DM for more intensive lipid‐lowering therapy (risk ratio: 0.95; 95% CI, 0.87–1.04; P=0.30; R²=14%) or for statins or PCSK9 inhibitors. More intensive lipid‐lowering therapy was associated with a higher risk of incident DM compared with less intensive therapy (risk ratio: 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03–1.11; P<0.001; I²=0%). These results were driven by higher risk of incident DM with statins (risk ratio: 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05–1.15; P<0.001; I²=0%), whereas PCSK9 inhibitors were not associated with incident DM (risk ratio: 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93–1.07; P=0.96; I²=0%; P=0.02 for interaction).

Conclusions

Among intensive lipid‐lowering therapies, there was no independent association between reduction in LDL cholesterol and incident DM. The risk of incident DM was higher with statins, whereas PCSK9 inhibitors had no association with risk of incident DM.

PCSK9 Inhibitors: From Nature’s Lessons to Clinical Utility

Background:

Proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are a novel class of non-statin lipid lowering therapy that reduce LDL-cholesterol by 50 - 60%. PCSK9 inhibitors decrease LDL-cholesterol by preventing intracellular degradation of LDL receptors; subsequently, a greater number of LDL-receptors are available on the cell surface to extract circulating LDL.

Objective:

To describe the origins of PCSK9 inhibitors and their current use in clinical practice.

Methods:

We performed a narrative review of the PCSK9 inhibitor class of drugs.

Results:

Current data indicate that PCSK9 inhibitors effectively reduce LDL-cholesterol and are well tolerated and safe. PCSK9 inhibitors have also been shown to reduce cardiovascular event rates in patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and in patients with a recent (up to one year) acute coronary syndrome. Given the costs, chronicity of the treatment and the potential budget impact, PCSK9 inhibitors are often limited to patients with the highest absolute risk for major adverse cardiovascular events despite optimal treatment with high-intensity statin and ezetimibe.

Conclusion:

PCSK9 inhibitors have a favorable safety, efficacy and tolerability profile. Postmarketing safety surveillance and real-world studies are needed to further support the long-term safety profile of this class of medicine.

Biotechnology Approaches for the Treatment of Dyslipidemia

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in the development of lipid-lowering therapies, clinical trials have shown that a significant residual risk of cardiovascular disease persists. Specifically, new drugs are needed for non-responding or statin-intolerant subjects or patients considered at very high risk for cardiovascular events even though are already on treatment with the best standard of care.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Besides, genetic and epidemiological studies and Mendelian randomization analyses have strengthened the linear correlation between the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and the incidence of cardiovascular events and highlighted various novel therapeutic targets. This review describes the novel strategies to reduce the levels of LDL-C, non-HDL-C, triglyceride, apolipoprotein B, and Lp(a), focusing on those developed using biotechnology-based strategies.

The efficacy and safety of statin in combination with ezetimibe compared with double-dose statin in patients with high cardiovascular risk: A meta-analysis

Currently, statins are the first-line therapies for dyslipidemia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, however, their hypolipidemic effects have not been satisfactory. We performed a meta-analysis to compare lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of ezetimibe and statin combination therapy with double-dose statin monotherapy in patients with high cardiovascular risk. Fourteen studies involving 3105 participants were included in the final analysis; 1558 (50.18%) participants received ezetimibe and statin combination therapy and 1547 (49.82%) received double-dose statin monotherapy. Eight studies reported the percentages of changes in several lipid parameters from baseline to endpoint in both groups. Lipid parameters changed more significantly in patients coadministered with ezetimibe and statin (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C]: MD = -9.39, 95% CI -13.36 to -5.42; non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [non-HDL-C]: MD = -10.36, 95% CI -14.23 to -6.50; total cholesterol [TC]: MD = -8.11, 95% CI -10.95 to -5.26; and triglyceride [TG]: MD = -5.96, 95% CI -9.12 to -2.80), with moderate to high heterogeneity among the studies. Two out of fourteen studies investigated several different statins. Our subgroup analysis showed that, compared with double-dose atorvastatin monotherapy, ezetimibe and atorvastatin combination therapy significantly decreased LDL-C, non-HDL-C, TC, and TG levels by 14.16%, 14.01%, 11.06%, and 5.96%, respectively (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the incidence of laboratory-related adverse events (AEs) between statin combination therapy and monotherapy. Overall, ezetimibe and statin combination therapy significantly decreased LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and TC levels in patients with high cardiovascular risk, among which ezetimibe combined with atorvastatin had the best therapeutic effect. Compared with ezetimibe and statin combination therapy, double-dose statin monotherapy did not increase the risk of AEs.

Efficacy and Safety of PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibodies in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 32 Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies are powerful lipid-lowering drugs which have been shown to improve clinical endpoints in patients with hypercholesterolemia. However, it is not clear how effective PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies are for patients at high cardiovascular risk. Also, whether the effectiveness of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies varies between different drug types, dosages, race, and indications for PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies remains unclear. Therefore, we used recently published studies to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies by analyzing the lipid profiles, adverse events, and clinical endpoints in patients at high cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies with placebos or active drugs in patients at high cardiovascular risk were retrieved from electronic databases from their inception until November 2019. Efficacy and safety outcomes included low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other lipid profiles, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse events of interests, and clinical endpoints. Subgroup analyses based on drug types, dosing, and race were conducted. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 15.1 and RevMan 5.0.

RESULTS

Thirty-two RCTs were included in the systematic review, and 25 of them (57,090 individuals) were included in the meta-analysis. PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies significantly improved LDL-C and other lipid profiles (P < 0.05), and no racial differences were found. A recommended dose of 140 mg of evolocumab every 2 weeks was likely to produce a relatively stronger effect than 150 mg of alirocumab every 2 weeks in terms of the absolute change (weighted mean differences (WMD) - 0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.71 to - 0.01; P = 0.041) and percent change (WMD - 19.53; 95% CI - 32.02 to - 7.04; P = 0.002) in LDL-C levels. Overall, PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies were safe, except for the significantly increased risk of injection site reactions (relative risks (RR) 1.54; 95% CI 1.38-1.71; P < 0.001). Both alirocumab (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.95; P < 0.001) and evolocumab (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.80-0.92; P < 0.001) were associated with a lower risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs), especially in secondary preventive patients (alirocumab group: RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.82-0.95; P < 0.001; evolocumab group: RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.80-0.92; P < 0.001). The reduction in MACEs was observed in White but not in Asian subjects. No significant reduction of all-cause mortality was found (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.72-1.07; P = 0.182).

CONCLUSION

Both alirocumab and evolocumab are well tolerated and can greatly improve lipid profiles for patients at high cardiovascular risk. Both PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies significantly reduce the risk of nonfatal MACEs in patients with previous cardiovascular events, but the effect on all-cause mortality remains uncertain.

PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibodies: An Overview

PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies are novel lipid-lowering therapy that have been extensively studied in patients with hypercholesterolemia either as monotherapy or as an add-on to other LLTs. PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies have significantly reduced the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) plasma level resulting in a better LDL-C goal attainment. The commercially available PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies, alirocumab and evolocumab, have demonstrated reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, and the need for coronary revascularization but not mortality. PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies have demonstrated a favorable safety profile. The most reported side effects are mild injection site with no causal relationship proven between the inhibition of PCSK9 and neurocognitive or glycemic adverse events. In this overview, the efficacy and safety of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of primary and familial hypercholesterolemia will be discussed.

Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Alirocumab in Healthy Volunteers or Hypercholesterolemic Subjects Using an Indirect Response Model to Predict Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering: Support for a Biologics License Application Submission: Part II

BACKGROUND

Alirocumab, a human monoclonal antibody against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), significantly lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis aimed to develop and qualify a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for alirocumab based on pooled data obtained from 13 phase I/II/III clinical trials.

METHODS

From a dataset of 2799 individuals (14,346 low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol values), individual pharmacokinetic parameters from the population pharmacokinetic model presented in Part I of this series were used to estimate alirocumab concentrations. As a second step, we then developed the current population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model using an indirect response model with a Hill coefficient, parameterized with increasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol elimination, to relate alirocumab concentrations to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values.

RESULTS

The population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model allowed the characterization of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of alirocumab in the target population and estimation of individual low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and derived pharmacodynamic parameters (the maximum decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values from baseline and the difference between baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the pre-dose value before the next alirocumab dose). Significant parameter-covariate relationships were retained in the model, with a total of ten covariates (sex, age, weight, free baseline PCSK9, total time-varying PCSK9, concomitant statin administration, total baseline PCSK9, co-administration of high-dose statins, disease status) included in the final population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to explain between-subject variability. Nevertheless, the high number of covariates included in the model did not have a clinically meaningful impact on model-derived pharmacodynamic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

This model successfully allowed the characterization of the population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of alirocumab in its target population and the estimation of individual low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

Triglyceride concentrations and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in the ODYSSEY phase 3 trials with alirocumab

Aims

Guidelines recommend targeting non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to reduce cardiovascular risk. We assessed the impact of baseline triglycerides on non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in 10 phase 3 trials with alirocumab versus control (n = 4983).

Methods

Trials were grouped into four pools based on alirocumab dose (75–150 mg every 2 weeks), control (placebo/ezetimibe) and statin use. Baseline triglyceride quintiles were built within each pool. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment (very high risk: <100 mg/dl; moderate/high risk: <130 mg/dl), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment (very high risk: <70 mg/dl; moderate/high risk: <100 mg/dl) and changes from baseline in lipid parameters were assessed at Week 24 among baseline triglyceride quintiles.

Results

Higher baseline triglycerides were associated with a worse cardiovascular risk profile. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased with higher triglycerides, but the magnitude in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was three- to four-fold higher compared with the increase in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol percentage reductions from baseline with alirocumab were similar regardless of baseline triglycerides. A greater proportion of alirocumab-treated patients attained non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals compared with placebo or ezetimibe. Unlike low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment significantly declined with increasing baseline triglycerides (p < 0.05 for trend tests). A single standard deviation increase in baseline log(triglycerides) was significantly associated with lower odds ratios of attaining non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in the different pools and treatment (alirocumab/placebo/ezetimibe) groups, unlike low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment.

Conclusion

Individuals with increased triglycerides have higher non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and lower rates of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment (unlike low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment). Alirocumab improves non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in this population. These results highlight the impact of triglycerides on non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the need for novel therapies targeting triglyceride-related pathways.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/Kexin type-9 (PCSK-9) inhibitors induced liver injury - a retrospective analysis

Background: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/Kexin type 9 (PCSK-9) inhibitors induced liver dysfunction in patients with or without previous liver injury, and this is not well discussed in the previous literature. Methods: A total sample of 202 patients were retrospectively reviewed at the University of Missouri, Kansas City, from the year 2015 to 2018 based on predefined selection criteria. Inclusion criteria involved patients with dyslipidemia, with or without PCSK-9 inhibitors, liver function tests and lipid profile at baseline and at a mean of 6-month follow-up. The variables, including age, gender, and confounding factors like other medications (statin, oral antidiabetic, and antihypertensive) induced, or chronic secondary liver diseases causing liver injury were taken into consideration. Exclusion criteria included patients without dyslipidemia. Results: The mean age of the study population was 64 ± 11 years (63% males and 37% females). The lipid profile including triglyceride and cholesterol levels during 6-month follow-up visit showed a mean of 184 ± 260 and 163 ± 50 mg/dL as compared to that at baseline of 227 ± 603 and 181 ± 70 mg/dL, respectively. In terms of clinical efficacy, a 6-month follows-up showed a drop in triglyceride and cholesterol levels by 38 and 15 mg/dL, respectively. A liver function test at 6 months in patients taking PCSK-9 inhibitors showed an increase in alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) by 5.8 mg/dL (p = 0.037) and 6.2 mg/dL (p = 0.008), respectively, from baseline values. Conclusion: PCSK-9 inhibitors should be used cautiously with a follow-up liver function test.

Efficacy of combination therapy with ezetimibe and statins versus a double dose of statin monotherapy in participants with hypercholesterolemia: a meta-analysis of literature

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare and summarize the lipid-altering effects of combination therapy with ezetimibe and statins (E/S) and a double dose of statin (D/S) monotherapy on patients with hypercholesterolemia.

METHODS

We conducted search on 2 medical databases, PubMed and EMBASE to identify all relevant studies. A meta-analysis was performed to clarify the efficacy in the two groups. Only double-blind Randomized controlled study (RCTs) of efficacy evaluation in the two groups with ezetimibe and statins and a double dose of statin in participants with hypercholesterolemia that examined low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were included. Two reviewers extracted data from all primary studies independently. The primary data were the level of LDL-C, TC and HDL-C concentrations at the end point and are expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD).

RESULTS

A total of 11 double-blind, active or placebo-controlled studies with 1926 hypercholesterolemia adults randomized to ezetimibe 10 mg added to ongoing statins (N = 994) or statin titration (doubling) (N = 932) were pooled for the global meta-analysis. The effect size between treatment groups within individual studies was assessed by weighted mean difference (MD) using a random- or fixed-effect model. The result showed that the participants in E/S group get obvious lower LDL-C [MD = -13.14 mg/dL, 95%CI (-16.83, -9.44), p = 0.00001] and TC concentration [MD = -23.79 mg/dL, 95%CI (-38.65, -8.93), p = 0.002] from baseline to follow-up, comparing to the D/S group. Besides, no significant between-group differences were observed for concentrations of HDL-C [MD = 0.46 mg/dL, 95%CI (- 1.14, 2.06), p = 0.57]. According to subgroup analysis, the combination of ezetimibe and atorvastatin (10 mg) [MD = -16.98 mg/dL, p < 0 .0001] or simvastatin (20 mg) [MD = -17.35 mg/dL, p < 0 .0001] showed stronger ability of reducing LDL-C than combination of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin (10 mg) [MD = -9.29 mg/dL, p = 0.05]. The efficacy of short-term (endpoint time between 6 to 16 week) and long-term (52 week) treatment in the LDL-C between two groups did not show significant differences. Besides, only participants from Asia treated with combination therapy were associated with a significant lower LDL-C concentration [MD = -14.7 mg/dL, p < 0 .0001].

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of ezetimibe to statin appears to be more effective on reducing LDL-C and TC concentrations than doubling the statin dose. Moreover, the ability to reduce cholesterol levels of combinations therapy with ezetimibe and different statins or to participants from different geographic location may vary, based on this meta-analysis, while more samples are needed to verify.

Dyslipidaemias and Cardiovascular Disease: Focus on the Role of PCSK9 Inhibitors

Genetic, experimental and clinical studies have consistently confirmed that inhibition of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin type 9 (PCSK9) can result in significant lowering of LDL-C and two fully human PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies have received regulatory approval for use in highrisk patients. Co-administration of PCSK9 with statins has resulted in extremely low LDL-C levels with excellent short-term safety profiles. While results from Phase III clinical trials provided significant evidence about the role of PCSK9 inhibitors in reducing cardiovascular event rates, their impact on mortality remains less clear. PCSK9 inhibitor therapy can be considered for high-risk patients who are likely to experience significant cardiovascular risk reduction.