Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in medicare beneficiaries

Incidental abdominal aortic aneurysms are largely undocumented and unmonitored

BACKGROUND

In countries without organized population screening, incidental detection remains the major form of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diagnosis. Despite the presumed homogeneity in AAA prevalence, its rate of repair is highly variable, with Portugal treating 2 to 6 times fewer AAA per habitant than other western countries.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the detection rate and monitoring of incidental AAA in a multicentre cohort from Portuguese hospitals.

METHODS

All abdominal CT scans performed in men ≥ 65 years old in three major Portuguese hospitals between January and June 2018 were selected for review. CT scans prescribed by the Vascular Surgery or Emergency Departments were excluded. Patients with previously known AAA were also excluded. Subjects with newly detected aneurysms were assessed for the two primary outcomes: the description of the finding by the radiologist in the written report; the effective follow-up recommendations by the prescriber of the CT or by the general practitioner (GP). Patients with newly found AAA that met criteria for monitoring or treatment and failed to be given guidance were contacted and included in surveillance programs.

RESULTS

Overall, 3292 abdominal CT scans were selected for review. A total of 133 newly found aneurysms were detected (4.2% prevalence in the cohort). Of those, 48 cases (36%) were not described by the radiologist in the written report. Further 42 patients (32%) were not successfully oriented by the ordering physician or GP, despite having had their AAA mentioned. Overall, only 32% (n = 42) of the newly diagnosed AAA were correctly identified and referred to monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental AAA is a common occurrence in in-hospital abdominal CTs. A significant number is not documented by the radiologist and the vast majority is not referred to monitoring. This could be a major reason for the low elective treatment rate of AAA in Portugal.

Factors Contributing to Late Cancellation and No-Show for Otolaryngologic Surgery: A Prospective Study

PURPOSE

Late cancellations and no-shows for surgery place a burden on patients, healthcare providers, and the health system. We aim to identify risk factors contributing to this phenomenon.

METHODS

Patients who did not arrive for, or canceled within 24 hours of, their surgical appointment between January 2019 and 2020 were identified. Controls were matched by date, procedure, and gender. Demographic information was obtained by phone interview and chart review. Chi-square and Student t-test analyses were used to predict risk factors for cancellation.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were identified, of whom 21 completed phone interviews. Age, gender, race, language, marital status, and smoking status were not significantly different. Study patients reported more transportation challenges (33.3% vs. 4.8%, p = .01) yet lived closer to the hospital (4.53 miles vs. 14.05 miles, p = .01). Study patients lived in lower income zip codes ($48,145 vs. $63,406, p = .02) and more commonly had Medicaid as their primary insurance (70.9% vs. 38.7%, p = .04). Most commonly, no reason was given for cancellation (22.6%) followed by personal reasons (16.1%) and surgery reconsideration (16.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Transportation trouble and lower income are significant risk factors for surgery late cancellation. Prior no-show must also be considered. A targeted pilot program may help prevent late cancellations.

Epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) disease remains a major source of morbidity in developed countries and can progress to life-threatening rupture if left untreated, with exceedingly high mortality. The goal of AAA management is to identify and electively repair AAAs before rupture. AAA disease burden and outcomes have improved over time with declining tobacco use and advancements in care across patients' disease course. The introduction of endovascular AAA repair, in particular, has allowed for elective AAA repair in patients previously considered too high risk for open surgery and has contributed to lower rates of AAA rupture over time. However, these improved outcomes are not universally experienced, and disparities continue to exist in the detection, treatment, and outcomes of AAA by sex, race, and ethnicity. Mitigating these disparities requires enhanced, focused efforts at preventing disease, promoting health, and delivering appropriate care among an increasingly diverse patient population.

Evaluating the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States through a national screening database

OBJECTIVE

The U.S. Preventative Services Task Force guidelines for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening are based mainly on studies of older Caucasian males from non-U.S.

POPULATIONS

This study was designed to analyze the findings of a large, all-inclusive AAA screening program in the United States.

METHODS

Screening events were held nationally by a U.S. nonprofit organization between 2001 and 2017. AAA screening was offered regardless of risk profile. Participants filled out a demographics form with known comorbidities. Significant risk factors were determined using logistic regression with backward stepwise variable selection. Odds ratios (OR) are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 9457 screened participants (47% male) were analyzed. The mean age was 67 ± 9 years with 40.8% between 65 and 75 years old. Most participants were Caucasian (83.4%), followed by African American (13.1%). Screened risk factors included hypertension (58.1%), hyperlipidemia (54.9%), smoking (52.0%), cardiac disease (29.2%), diabetes mellitus (18.4%), a family history of AAA (22.4%) or brain aneurysms (8.6%), and body mass index (26.9 ± 5.28). Overall, 267 participants (2.82%) were found to have an AAA (>3 cm). Those ages 65 to 75 had a prevalence of 2.98%. In a fully adjusted, multivariate logistic regression, there was an increased risk of AAA in males (OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 2.39-4.40), current smokers (OR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.36-4.54), previous smokers (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.41-2.47), cardiac disease (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01-1.68), family history of AAA (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.20-2.14), and advancing age (P < .0001). Female ever smokers 65 to 75 years old had a prevalence of 1.7%. Male smokers 45 to 54 and 55 to 64 years old had a prevalence of 3.37% and 4.43%, respectively. There was an increased risk of AAA in females with morbid obesity (OR, 5.54; 95% CI, 1.34-22.83 in never smokers and OR, 5.61; 95% CI, 1.04-30.15 in smokers), female smokers with hypertension (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.21-8.58), males with cardiac disease (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.08-3.90 in never smokers and OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.05-2.09), male smokers with a family history of AAA (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.61-2.46), and current smokers (OR, 6.33; 95% CI, 2.62-15.24 for females and OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.70-3.65 for males).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that there remain high-risk groups outside the current guidelines that would likely benefit from AAA screening. Risk factors for AAA include male gender, smoking, cardiac disease, family history of AAA, and advancing age. The most significant risk factor is current smoking status.

Disparities in Contemporary Treatment Rates of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Across Western Countries

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Several abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programs have demonstrated a similar prevalence of this disease in Westerns countries, ranging from 1.2% to 2.8%. However, the annual rate of AAA repair is significantly less even, and its relationship to AAA prevalence is not clear. The objective was to perform a systematic review, describing an international overview in the yearly rate of AAA repairs.

METHODS

The number of elective and emergency AAA repairs was obtained via thorough review of publications indexed in PubMed and Scopus from 2010 to October 2018. Portuguese data were obtained from the national administrative database of health care. Data from the UK were extracted from the National Vascular Registry's 2015 annual report. Each country's population was assessed from published national censuses, thus allowing estimation of the number of AAAs treated per 100,000 habitants.

RESULTS

Data from 14 countries were obtained. The yearly number of elective operations per 100,000 habitants was 2.2 in Hungary, 3.8 in Portugal, 5.3 in Spain, 5.9 in Iceland, 6.5 in Finland, 7.0 in New Zealand, 7.8 in the UK, 10.0 in Denmark, 10.2 in Sweden, 13.3 in the USA, 14.8 in Norway, 15.3 in the Netherlands, 15.6 in Italy, and 17.3 in Germany. The yearly rate of ruptured repairs was 0.5 in Hungary, 1.5 in Portugal, 1.8 in Spain, 1.7 in Iceland, 1.7 in Finland, 1.3 in New Zealand, 1.8 in the UK, 3.3 in Denmark (2013), 2.7 in Sweden (2013), 1.7 in the USA, 2.1 in Norway, 3.1 in the Netherlands, 2.3 in Italy, and 2.7 in Germany.

CONCLUSION

The rate of AAA treatment is highly variable, with a nearly eightfold variance between the countries with the highest and lowest rates of elective repair. Correlation between elective and ruptured repairs was not clear. A deeper understanding of the reasons for the disparities in AAA treatment among Western countries is of the utmost importance.

[Prevalence and risk factors of sub-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm in an Algerian population aged over 60]

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in the general population in our country is not known, our aim was to evaluate it in patients over 60 years of age, to specify the risk factors and to evaluate the extension of aneurysmal disease and multisite subclinical atherosclerosis.

METHODS

Descriptive, transversal, study collecting the data of a systematic ultrasound screening of sub-renal AAA in subjects receiving care in two Algerian hospital structures. Epidemiological data, AAA risk factors, cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVD RF) and the personal history (cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and family history of AAA were collected during the screening. An abdominal echography was performed in all patients. A biological and morphological assessment was carried out for AAA cases detected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to study the factors associated with AAA.

RESULTS

Systematic screening for 600 patients revealed an overall AAA prevalence of 2.2% (n=13). In multivariate analysis a positive association with AAA was observed with active smoking, its duration in years and its intensity in year-packages; with hypertension, dyslipidemia and a history of cardiovascular events. While a negative association was observed with a smoking cessation of more than 20 years, type 2 diabetes and android obesity. The study of detected AAA cases found five cases of aneurysm isolated from the primary iliac artery but no popliteal and/or femoral aneurysm. The carotids were atheromatous in more than 80% of cases and the arteries of the lower limbs in more than one-third of cases.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of AAA in our population (2.2%) corresponds to the prevalence reported recently in Europe, but it would have been higher if the screening had targeted males and smokers. The factors associated with AAA in our patients are similar to those described in the literature.

Association of carotid atherosclerosis and stiffness with abdominal aortic aneurysm: The atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Individuals with atherosclerosis and stiffness often have increased abdominal aortic diameters, but prospective evidence linking them to the risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is limited.

METHODS

We prospectively examined the relationship of carotid atherosclerosis and stiffness with future risk of AAA in ARIC. At Visits 1 (1987-89) or 2 (1990-1992), we assessed carotid atherosclerosis (represented by greater carotid intima-media thickness [cIMT] or presence of atherosclerotic plaque) and lower carotid distensibility (reflected by a higher carotid Beta Index). We identified incident, clinical AAAs during follow-up through 2011 using hospital discharge codes, Medicare outpatient diagnoses, or death certificates.

RESULTS

Participants' mean age at baseline was 54.2 years (SD 5.8), 45% were male and 73% white. During a median of 22.5 years of follow-up, 542 clinical AAAs were ascertained. After multivariable adjustment, the presence of carotid atherosclerotic plaque at baseline was associated with 1.31 (95% CI: 1.10-1.57; p = 0.003) times higher risk of clinical AAA. Greater cIMT and Beta Index were also associated with clinical AAA with a dose-response across quartiles (p trend for both: 0.006; hazard ratios [95% CI] for the highest vs. lowest quartiles: 1.55 [1.13-2.11] and 1.68 [1.16-2.43], respectively). The associations of cIMT and Beta Index with AAA were independent of each other.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective population-based study found that indices of greater carotid atherosclerosis and lower carotid distensibility are markers of increased AAA risk.

An interview-based study of nonattendance at screening for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes in older women: Nonattendees' perspectives

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study explored nonattendees' perspectives on a screening programme for cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus among women aged 60-77 years.

BACKGROUND

Nonattendance in screening is a common concern and has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Whether nonattendees need targeted information to participate in screening is unknown. Thus, it is important to explore the reasons for nonattendance, particularly as nonattendees' perspectives have not been fully explored.

DESIGN

An interview study.

METHODS

The data were obtained through semistructured interviews with 10 women sampled from a population who declined to participate in a women's screening programme for cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. Additionally, reflective notes on the interview context were documented. The data were collected in 2013. Kvale and Brinkmann's method for data analysis was applied.

RESULTS

All informants found the screening offer personally irrelevant, but this belief was changeable. The informants' perceptions of screening were based on subjective health and risk beliefs, personal knowledge of diseases and the screening programme, and distrust in the healthcare system.

CONCLUSION

Personal experiences, beliefs and self-protective strategies influence individuals' subjective interpretations of a screening programme's relevance. The perception that screening is irrelevant seems to be rooted in nonattendees' personal health-related assessment and knowledge. Consequently, whether nonattendance is determined by an informed decision is questionable. Negative experiences with the healthcare system led to hesitation towards screening in general.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This study is relevant to healthcare workers as well as decision-makers from a screening and preventive perspective. The findings highlight important issues that should be addressed to encourage invitees to accept screening invitations and to facilitate informed decision-making about screening participation.

Experiences of the screening process and the diagnosis abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old men from invitation to a 1-year surveillance

The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is reported to be 2.2%-8% among men >65 years. During recent years, screening programs have been developed to detect AAA, prevent ruptures, and thereby saving lives. Therefore, most men with the diagnosis are monitored conservatively with regular reviews. The objective of the study was to describe how men diagnosed with abdominal aortic aneurysm <55 mm discovered by screening experience the process and diagnosis from invitation to 1 year after screening. A total of eleven 65-year-old men were included in three focus groups performed in a University Hospital in Sweden. These were qualitatively analyzed using manifest and latent content analysis. The experience of the screening process and having an abdominal aortic aneurysm in a long-term perspective revealed three categories: "trusting the health care system," emphasizing the need for continual follow-ups to ensure feelings of security; "the importance size," meaning that the measure was abstract and hard to understand; and "coping with the knowledge of abdominal aortic aneurysm," denoting how everyday life was based mostly on beliefs, since a majority lacked understanding about the meaning of the condition. The men want regular surveillance and surrendered to the health care system, but simultaneously experienced a lack of support thereof. Knowing the size of the aorta was important. The men expressed insecurity about how lifestyle might influence the abdominal aortic aneurysm and what they could do to improve their health condition. This highlights the importance of communicating knowledge about the abdominal aortic aneurysm to promote men's feelings of security and giving space to discuss the size of the aneurysm and lifestyle changes.

Quantitative Aortic Distensibility Measurement Using CT in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Reproducibility and Clinical Relevance

Purpose. To investigate the reproducibility of aortic distensibility (D) measurement using CT and assess its clinical relevance in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Methods. 54 patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm were studied to determine their distensibility by using 64-MDCT. Aortic cross-sectional area changes were determined at two positions of the aorta, immediately below the lowest renal artery (level 1.) and at the level of its maximal diameter (level 2.) by semiautomatic segmentation. Measurement reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to assess linear associations between aortic D and anthropometric and biochemical parameters. Results. A mean distensibility of D_{level  1.} = (1.05 ± 0.22) × 10⁻⁵  Pa⁻¹ and D_{level  2.} = (0.49 ± 0.18) × 10⁻⁵  Pa⁻¹ was found. ICC proved excellent consistency between readers over two locations: 0.92 for intraobserver and 0.89 for interobserver difference in level 1. and 0.85 and 0.79 in level 2. Multivariate analysis of all these variables showed sac distensibility to be independently related (R² = 0.68) to BMI, diastolic blood pressure, and AAA diameter. Conclusions. Aortic distensibility measurement in patients with AAA demonstrated high inter- and intraobserver agreement and may be valuable when choosing the optimal dimensions graft for AAA before endovascular aneurysm repair.

Meta-analysis of the current prevalence of screen-detected abdominal aortic aneurysm in women

Background

Although women represent an increasing proportion of those presenting with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture, the current prevalence of AAA in women is unknown. The contemporary population prevalence of screen‐detected AAA in women was investigated by both age and smoking status.

Methods

A systematic review was undertaken of studies screening for AAA, including over 1000 women, aged at least 60 years, done since the year 2000. Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases until 13 January 2016. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scoring system.

Results

Eight studies were identified, including only three based on population registers. The largest studies were based on self‐purchase of screening. Altogether 1 537 633 women were screened. Overall AAA prevalence rates were very heterogeneous, ranging from 0·37 to 1·53 per cent: pooled prevalence 0·74 (95 per cent c.i. 0·53 to 1·03) per cent. The pooled prevalence increased with both age (more than 1 per cent for women aged over 70 years) and smoking (more than 1 per cent for ever smokers and over 2 per cent in current smokers).

Conclusion

The current population prevalence of screen‐detected AAA in older women is subject to wide demographic variation. However, in ever smokers and those over 70 years of age, the prevalence is over 1 per cent.

Significant in older women who smoke

Prevalence and trends of the abdominal aortic aneurysms epidemic in general population--a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a meta-analysis assessing the prevalence and trends of the abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) epidemic in general population.

METHOD

Studies that reported prevalence rates of AAA from the general population were identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and reference lists for the period between 1988 and 2013. Studies were included if they reported prevalence rates of AAA in general population from the community. In stratified analyses possible sources of bias, including areas difference, age, gender and diameter of aneurysms were examined. Publication bias was assessed with Egger's test method.

RESULTS

56 studies were identified. The overall pooled prevalence of AAA was 4.8% (4.3%, 5.3%). Stratified analyses showed the following results, areas difference: America 2.2% (2.2%, 2.2%), Europe 2.5% (2.4%, 2.5%), Australia 6.7% (6.5%, 7.0%), Asia 0.5% (0.3%, 0.7%); gender difference: male 6.0% (5.3%, 6.7%), female 1.6% (1.2%, 1.9%); age difference: 55-64years 1.3% (1.2%, 1.5%), 65-74 years 2.8% (2.7%, 2.9%), 75-84 years1.2%(1.1%, 1.3%), ≥85years0.6% (0.4%, 0.7%); aortic diameters difference: 30-39 mm, 3.3% (2.8%, 3.9%), 40-49 mm,0.7% (0.4%,1.0%), ≥50 mm, 0.4% (0.3%, 0.5%). The prevalence of AAA has decreased in Europe from 1988 to 2013. Hypertension, smoking, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, respiratory disease, cerebrovascular disease, claudication and renal insufficiency were risk factors for AAA in Europe.

CONCLUSION

AAA is common in general population. The prevalence of AAA is higher in Australia than America and Europe. The pooled prevalence in western countries is higher than the Asia. Future research requires a larger database on the epidemiology of AAA in general population.

To be under control: a qualitative study of patients' experiences living with the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Abdominal aortic aneurysm can be treated using 3 different methods: open repair, endovascular aortic repair, or conservative treatment with regular monitoring and postponement of surgery until the aneurysm is greater than 55 mm. Conservative treatment entails living with the knowledge that an aneurysm is present while undergoing annual outpatient follow-up.

AIM

This study describes patients' experiences of living with the knowledge that they have an aneurysm for which they are receiving conservative treatment.

METHODS

A qualitative, phenomenological-hermeneutic approach was used. Interviews were conducted between April 2007 and December 2008 with 10 patients diagnosed with abdominal aortic aneurysm less than 55 mm. The interpretation and analysis process involved 3 steps: (1) naive reading and understanding, (2) structural analysis, and (3) comprehensive understanding.

FINDINGS

Five themes based on subthemes were identified: (a) sudden knowledge of a hitherto undetected condition, (b) putting your life in someone else's hands, (c) waiting in limbo-feeling secure despite concerns, (d) life is at stake, and (e) feeling obliged not to cause worry.

CONCLUSION

Living with a diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm implies awareness of having an invisible, life-threatening disease and a sense of being subjected to suffering. We found that patients searched for answers about how to influence the growth of the aneurysm in their everyday life. They avoided thoughts about the aneurysm and struggled to live life as usual.

The drama of being diagnosed with an aortic aneurysm and undergoing surgery for two different procedures: open repair and endovascular techniques

The purpose of this study is to describe and interpret what it means for patients to be diagnosed with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and how they experience treatment. AAA is usually asymptomatic and often discovered coincidentally in conjunction with a diagnostic workup for other medical problems. Twenty patients who had undergone 2 different surgical procedures were sequentially invited for interviews 1 month following surgery. A hermeneutic approach was used. For all patients three themes emerged: an inability to come to terms with a life-threatening condition, a sense of living on borrowed time, and a sense of being granted a new lease on life. The theme that emerged for patients with open repair was that diagnosis with AAA was an ordeal to endure, while the theme for patients who underwent endovascular treatment was a sense of gratitude, security, and insecurity. Once the aneurysm was discovered patients were convinced that they were both blessed and saved, along with a sense of gratitude. Pre- and postoperative nursing care strategies can be developed based on the findings from this study.

Cardiovascular disease management: the need for better diagnostics

Current diagnostic testing for cardiovascular pathology usually rests on either physiological or anatomic measurement. Multiple tests must then be combined to arrive at a conclusion regarding treatment of a specific pathology. Much of the diagnostic decisions currently made are based on rough estimates of outcomes, often derived from gross anatomic observations or extrapolation of physical laws. Thus, intervention for carotid and coronary disease is based on estimates of diameter stenosis, despite data to suggest that plaque character and lesion anatomy are important determinants of outcome. Similarly, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) intervention is based on maximal aneurysm diameter without regard for arterial wall composition or individual aneurysm geometry. In other words, our current diagnostic tests do not reflect the sophistication of our current knowledge of vascular disease. Using a multimodal approach, computer modeling has the potential to predict clinical outcomes based on a variety of factors including arterial wall composition, surface anatomy and hemodynamic forces. We term this more sophisticated approach "patient specific diagnostics", in which the computer models are reconstructed from patient specific clinical visualizing modalities, and material properties are extracted from experimental measurements of specimens and incorporated into the modeling using advanced material models (including nonlinear anisotropic models) and performed as dynamic simulations using the FSI (fluid structure interaction) approach. Such an approach is sorely needed to improve the effectiveness of interventions. This article will review ongoing work in "patient specific diagnostics" in the areas of carotid, coronary and aneurismal disease. We will also suggest how this approach may be applicable to management of aortic dissection. New diagnostic methods should allow better patient selection, targeted intervention and modeling of the results of different therapies.

Back and thigh pain of unusual etiology complicates rehabilitation after bilateral total knee arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty is frequently performed and usually associated with favorable results. A case is presented where persistent back and thigh pain limited rehabilitation progress following bilateral total knee arthroplasty procedures. The pain was found to be related to the presence of a symptomatic 5.24-cm infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with the pain resolving after endovascular repair of the aneurysm.