Bacillus subtilis tRNA(Pro) with the anticodon mo5UGG can recognize the codon CCC

yaaJ, the tRNA-Specific Adenosine Deaminase, Is Dispensable in Bacillus subtilis

Post-transcriptional modifications of tRNA are crucial for their core function. The inosine (I; 6-deaminated adenosine) at the first position in the anticodon of tRNAArg(ICG) modulates the decoding capability and is generally considered essential for reading CGU, CGC, and CGA codons in eubacteria. We report here that the Bacillus subtilis yaaJ gene encodes tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase and is non-essential for viability. A β-galactosidase reporter assay revealed that the translational activity of CGN codons was not impaired in the yaaJ-deletion mutant. Furthermore, tRNAArg(CCG) responsible for decoding the CGG codon was dispensable, even in the presence or absence of yaaJ. These results strongly suggest that tRNAArg with either the anticodon ICG or ACG has an intrinsic ability to recognize all four CGN codons, providing a fundamental concept of non-canonical wobbling mediated by adenosine and inosine nucleotides in the anticodon. This is the first example of the four-way wobbling by inosine nucleotide in bacterial cells. On the other hand, the absence of inosine modification induced +1 frameshifting, especially at the CGA codon. Additionally, the yaaJ deletion affected growth and competency. Therefore, the inosine modification is beneficial for translational fidelity and proper growth-phase control, and that is why yaaJ has been actually conserved in B. subtilis.

Wobbling Forth and Drifting Back: The Evolutionary History and Impact of Bacterial tRNA Modifications

Along with tRNAs, enzymes that modify anticodon bases are a key aspect of translation across the tree of life. tRNA modifications extend wobble pairing, allowing specific (“target”) tRNAs to recognize multiple codons and cover for other (“nontarget”) tRNAs, often improving translation efficiency and accuracy. However, the detailed evolutionary history and impact of tRNA modifying enzymes has not been analyzed. Using ancestral reconstruction of five tRNA modifications across 1093 bacteria, we show that most modifications were ancestral to eubacteria, but were repeatedly lost in many lineages. Most modification losses coincided with evolutionary shifts in nontarget tRNAs, often driven by increased bias in genomic GC and associated codon use, or by genome reduction. In turn, the loss of tRNA modifications stabilized otherwise highly dynamic tRNA gene repertoires. Our work thus traces the complex history of bacterial tRNA modifications, providing the first clear evidence for their role in the evolution of bacterial translation.

The central role of tRNA in genetic code expansion

BACKGROUND

The development of orthogonal translation systems (OTSs) for genetic code expansion (GCE) has allowed for the incorporation of a diverse array of non-canonical amino acids (ncAA) into proteins. Transfer RNA, the central molecule in the translation of the genetic message into proteins, plays a significant role in the efficiency of ncAA incorporation.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

Here we review the biochemical basis of OTSs for genetic code expansion. We focus on the role of tRNA and discuss strategies used to engineer tRNA for the improvement of ncAA incorporation into proteins.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

The engineering of orthogonal tRNAs for GCE has significantly improved the incorporation of ncAAs. However, there are numerous unintended consequences of orthogonal tRNA engineering that cannot be predicted ab initio.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

Genetic code expansion has allowed for the incorporation of a great diversity of ncAAs and novel chemistries into proteins, making significant contributions to our understanding of biological molecules and interactions. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Biochemistry of Synthetic Biology - Recent Developments" Guest Editor: Dr. Ilka Heinemann and Dr. Patrick O'Donoghue.

Non-Conserved Residues in Clostridium acetobutylicum tRNA(Ala) Contribute to tRNA Tuning for Efficient Antitermination of the alaS T Box Riboswitch

The T box riboswitch regulates expression of amino acid-related genes in Gram-positive bacteria by monitoring the aminoacylation status of a specific tRNA, the binding of which affects the folding of the riboswitch into mutually exclusive terminator or antiterminator structures. Two main pairing interactions between the tRNA and the leader RNA have been demonstrated to be necessary, but not sufficient, for efficient antitermination. In this study, we used the Clostridium acetobutylicum alaS gene, which encodes alanyl-tRNA synthetase, to investigate the specificity of the tRNA response. We show that the homologous C. acetobutylicum tRNA^Ala directs antitermination of the C. acetobutylicum alaS gene in vitro, but the heterologous Bacillus subtilis tRNA^Ala (with the same anticodon and acceptor end) does not. Base substitutions at positions that vary between these two tRNAs revealed synergistic and antagonistic effects. Variation occurs primarily at positions that are not conserved in tRNA^Ala species, which indicates that these non-conserved residues contribute to optimal antitermination of the homologous alaS gene. This study suggests that elements in tRNA^Ala may have coevolved with the homologous alaS T box leader RNA for efficient antitermination.

T-box-mediated control of the anabolic proline biosynthetic genes of Bacillus subtilis

Bacillus subtilis possesses interlinked routes for the synthesis of proline. The ProJ–ProA–ProH route is responsible for the production of proline as an osmoprotectant, and the ProB–ProA–ProI route provides proline for protein synthesis. We show here that the transcription of the anabolic proBA and proI genes is controlled in response to proline limitation via a T-box-mediated termination/antitermination regulatory mechanism, a tRNA-responsive riboswitch. Primer extension analysis revealed mRNA leader transcripts of 270 and 269 nt for the proBA and proI genes, respectively, both of which are synthesized from SigA-type promoters. These leader transcripts are predicted to fold into two mutually exclusive secondary mRNA structures, forming either a terminator or an antiterminator configuration. Northern blot analysis allowed the detection of both the leader and the full-length proBA and proI transcripts. Assessment of the level of the proBA transcripts revealed that the amount of the full-length mRNA species strongly increased in proline-starved cultures. Genetic studies with a proB–treA operon fusion reporter strain demonstrated that proBA transcription is sensitively tied to proline availability and is derepressed as soon as cellular starvation for proline sets in. Both the proBA and the proI leader sequences contain a CCU proline-specific specifier codon prone to interact with the corresponding uncharged proline-specific tRNA. By replacing the CCU proline specifier codon in the proBA T-box leader with UUC, a codon recognized by a Phe-specific tRNA, we were able to synthetically re-engineer the proline-specific control of proBA transcription to a control that was responsive to starvation for phenylalanine.

Origin and function of the two major tail proteins of bacteriophage SPP1

The majority of bacteriophages have a long non-contractile tail (Siphoviridae) that serves as a conduit for viral DNA traffic from the phage capsid to the host cell at the beginning of infection. The 160-nm-long tail tube of Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage SPP1 is shown to be composed of two major tail proteins (MTPs), gp17.1 and gp17.1*, at a ratio of about 3:1. They share a common amino-terminus, but the latter species has approximately 10 kDa more than gp17.1. A CCC.UAA sequence with overlapping proline codons at the 3' end of gene 17.1 drives a programmed translational frameshift to another open reading frame. The recoding event generates gp17.1*. Phages carrying exclusively gp17.1 or gp17.1* are viable, but tails are structurally distinct. gp17.1 and the carboxyl-terminus of gp17.1* have a distinct evolutionary history correlating with different functions: the polypeptide sequence identical in the two proteins is responsible for assembly of the tail tube while the additional module of gp17.1* shields the structure exterior exposed to the environment. The carboxyl-terminal extension is an elaboration present in some tailed bacteriophages. Different extensions were found to combine in a mosaic fashion with the MTP essential module in a subset of Siphoviridae genomes.

Different aa-tRNAs are selected uniformly on the ribosome

Ten E. coli aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNAs) were assessed for their ability to decode cognate codons on E. coli ribosomes by using three assays that evaluate the key steps in the decoding pathway. Despite a wide variety of structural features, each aa-tRNA exhibited similar kinetic and thermodynamic properties in each assay. This surprising kinetic and thermodynamic uniformity is likely to reflect the importance of ribosome conformational changes in defining the rates and affinities of the decoding process as well as the evolutionary "tuning" of each aa-tRNA sequence to modify their individual interactions with the ribosome at each step.

The wobble hypothesis revisited: uridine-5-oxyacetic acid is critical for reading of G-ending codons

According to Crick's wobble hypothesis, tRNAs with uridine at the wobble position (position 34) recognize A- and G-, but not U- or C-ending codons. However, U in the wobble position is almost always modified, and Salmonella enterica tRNAs containing the modified nucleoside uridine-5-oxyacetic acid (cmo(5)U34) at this position are predicted to recognize U- (but not C-) ending codons, in addition to A- and G-ending codons. We have constructed a set of S. enterica mutants with only the cmo(5)U-containing tRNA left to read all four codons in the proline, alanine, valine, and threonine family codon boxes. From the phenotypes of these mutants, we deduce that the proline, alanine, and valine tRNAs containing cmo(5)U read all four codons including the C-ending codons, while the corresponding threonine tRNA does not. A cmoB mutation, leading to cmo(5)U deficiency in tRNA, was introduced. Monitoring A-site selection rates in vivo revealed that the presence of cmo(5)U34 stimulated the reading of CCU and CCC (Pro), GCU (Ala), and GUC (Val) codons. Unexpectedly, cmo(5)U is critical for efficient decoding of G-ending Pro, Ala, and Val codons. Apparently, whereas G34 pairs with U in mRNA, the reverse pairing (U34-G) requires a modification of U34.

Classification of the possible pairs between the first anticodon and the third codon positions based on a simple model assuming two geometries with which the pairing effectively potentiates the decoding complex

Crick's wobble theory states that some specific pairs between the bases at the first position of the anticodon (position 34) and the third position of the codon (position III) are allowed and the others are disallowed during the correct codon recognition. However, later researches have shown that the pairing rule, or the wobble rule, is different from the supposed one. Despite the continuing efforts including computer-aided model building studies and analyses of three-dimensional structures in the crystals of the ribosomes, the structural backgrounds of the wobble rule are still unclear. Here, I classify the possible pairs into 6 classes according to the increases accompanying the formation of the pairs in the potential productivity of the decoding complex on the basis of a simple model that was originally proposed previously and is refined here. In the model, the conformation with the base at position 34 displaced toward the minor groove side from the position for the Watson-Crick pairs is supposed to be equivalent to the conformation with the Watson-Crick pairs. It is also reasoned and supposed that some weak pairs may sometimes be allowed depending on the structural context. It is demonstrated that most of the experimental results reported so far are consistent with the model. I discuss on which experimental facts can be reasoned with the model and which need further explanations. I expect that the model will be a good basis for further understanding of the wobble rule and its structural backgrounds.