P2Y12 receptor antagonists and AR receptor agonists regulates Protein Disulfide Isomerase secretion from platelets and endothelial cells

Cell Surface Platelet Tissue Factor Expression: Regulation by P2Y12 and Link to Residual Platelet Reactivity

BACKGROUND

ADP-induced platelet activation leads to cell surface expression of several proteins, including TF (tissue factor). The role of ADP receptors in platelet TF modulation is still unknown. We aimed to assess the (1) involvement of P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors in ADP-induced TF exposure; (2) modulation of TFpos-platelets in anti-P2Y12-treated patients with coronary artery disease. Based on the obtained results, we revisited the intracellular localization of TF in platelets.

METHODS

The effects of P2Y1 or P2Y12 antagonists on ADP-induced TF expression and activity were analyzed in vitro by flow cytometry and thrombin generation assay in blood from healthy subjects, P2Y12-/-, and patients with gray platelet syndrome. Ex vivo, P2Y12 inhibition of TF expression by clopidogrel/prasugrel/ticagrelor, assessed by VASP (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein) platelet reactivity index, was investigated in coronary artery disease (n=238). Inhibition of open canalicular system externalization and electron microscopy (TEM) were used for TF localization.

RESULTS

In blood from healthy subjects, stimulated in vitro by ADP, the percentage of TFpos-platelets (17.3±5.5%) was significantly reduced in a concentration-dependent manner by P2Y12 inhibition only (-81.7±9.5% with 100 nM AR-C69931MX). In coronary artery disease, inhibition of P2Y12 is paralleled by reduction of ADP-induced platelet TF expression (VASP platelet reactivity index: 17.9±11%, 20.9±11.3%, 40.3±13%; TFpos-platelets: 10.5±4.8%, 9.8±5.9%, 13.6±6.3%, in prasugrel/ticagrelor/clopidogrel-treated patients, respectively). Despite this, 15% of clopidogrel good responders had a level of TFpos-platelets similar to the poor-responder group. Indeed, a stronger P2Y12 inhibition (130-fold) is required to inhibit TF than VASP. Thus, a VASP platelet reactivity index <20% (as in prasugrel/ticagrelor-treated patients) identifies patients with TFpos-platelets <20% (92% sensitivity). Finally, colchicine impaired in vitro ADP-induced TF expression but not α-granule release, suggesting that TF is open canalicular system stored as confirmed by TEM and platelet analysis of patients with gray platelet syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Data show that TF expression is regulated by P2Y12 and not P2Y1; P2Y12 antagonists downregulate the percentage of TFpos-platelets. In clopidogrel good-responder patients, assessment of TFpos-platelets highlights those with residual platelet reactivity. TF is stored in open canalicular system, and its membrane exposure upon activation is prevented by colchicine.

Current Adenosinergic Therapies: What Do Cancer Cells Stand to Gain and Lose?

A key objective in immuno-oncology is to reactivate the dormant immune system and increase tumour immunogenicity. Adenosine is an omnipresent purine that is formed in response to stress stimuli in order to restore physiological balance, mainly via anti-inflammatory, tissue-protective, and anti-nociceptive mechanisms. Adenosine overproduction occurs in all stages of tumorigenesis, from the initial inflammation/local tissue damage to the precancerous niche and the developed tumour, making the adenosinergic pathway an attractive but challenging therapeutic target. Many current efforts in immuno-oncology are focused on restoring immunosurveillance, largely by blocking adenosine-producing enzymes in the tumour microenvironment (TME) and adenosine receptors on immune cells either alone or combined with chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. However, the effects of adenosinergic immunotherapy are not restricted to immune cells; other cells in the TME including cancer and stromal cells are also affected. Here we summarise recent advancements in the understanding of the tumour adenosinergic system and highlight the impact of current and prospective immunomodulatory therapies on other cell types within the TME, focusing on adenosine receptors in tumour cells. In addition, we evaluate the structure- and context-related limitations of targeting this pathway and highlight avenues that could possibly be exploited in future adenosinergic therapies.

G protein-coupled purinergic P2Y receptor oligomerization: Pharmacological changes and dynamic regulation

P2Y receptors (P2YRs) are a δ group of rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with many essential functions in physiology and pathology, such as platelet aggregation, immune responses, neuroprotective effects, inflammation, and cellular proliferation. Thus, they are among the most researched therapeutic targets used for the clinical treatment of diseases (e.g., the antithrombotic drug clopidogrel and the dry eye treatment drug diquafosol). GPCRs transmit signals as dimers to increase the diversity of signalling pathways and pharmacological activities. Many studies have frequently confirmed dimerization between P2YRs and other GPCRs due to their functions in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular processes in vivo and in vitro. Recently, some P2YR dimers that dynamically balance physiological functions in the body were shown to be involved in effective signal transduction and exert pathological responses. In this review, we summarize the types, pharmacological changes, and active regulators of P2YR-related dimerization, and delineate new functions and pharmacological activities of P2YR-related dimers, which may be a novel direction to improve the effectiveness of medications.

A2A receptor agonists and P2Y12 receptor antagonists modulate expression of thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) and its secretion from Human Microvascular Endothelial Cells (HMEC-1)

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS

To address the problem of resistance to standard antiplatelet therapy in some patients, our team proposed a purinoceptor-dependent dual therapy. Its efficacy is also determined by the condition of the vascular endothelium which, by secreting numerous factors, is involved in hemostasis. Among them, thrombospondin-1 is important in the context of thrombotic events. Therefore we sought to determine if the novel dual purinoceptor-dependent concept is associated with TSP-1 changes in vascular endothelial cells.

METHODS AND RESULTS

TSP-1 expression in human microvascular endothelial cells was determined at transcriptional and protein level. We performed real-time PCR, the Western blot analysis and ELISA test. We found that TSP-1 mRNA and protein expression levels significantly changed in response to P1R agonists treatment. Furthermore, we have observed that co-administration of selective A2_AR agonists (UK-432,097 or MRE0094) with P2Y₁₂R antagonists altered TSP-1 expression levels, and the direction of these changes was not synergistic. MRE0094 applied with ARC69931MX or R-138727 increased mRNA expression from 39 to 56 or 57%, respectively (*P < 0.05 vs. MRE0094; ***P < 0.001 vs. control). Also, in the case of the P2Y₁₂R antagonists used together with UK-432,097, there was an increase from 53 to 71 and 70% (*P < 0.05 vs. UK-432,097; ***P < 0.001 vs. control). The observed trends in gene expression were reflected in the protein expression and the level of its secretion from HMEC-1.

CONCLUSION

The article presents evidence which proves that the purinoceptor-dependent concept is associated with TSP-1 changes in endothelial cells (EC). Moreover, Human Microvascular Endothelial Cells treatment applied together with agonists (MRE0094 or UK-432,097) and P2Y₁₂R antagonist did not result in any synergistic effect, implicating a possible crosstalk between G proteins in GPCRs dependent signaling. Therefore, we suggest that understanding of the specific mechanism underlying TSP-1 alterations in EC in the context of the dual purinoceptor-dependent approach is essential for antiplatelet therapies and should be the subject of future research.

Pathophysiological roles of cell surface and extracellular protein disulfide isomerase and their molecular mechanisms

Protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) is the prototypic member of the thiol isomerase family that catalyses disulfide bond rearrangement. Initially identified in the endoplasmic reticulum as folding catalysts, PDI and other members in its family have also been widely reported to reside on the cell surface and in the extracellular matrix. Although how PDI is exported and retained on the cell surface remains a subject of debate, this unique pool of PDI is developing into an important mechanism underlying the redox regulation of protein sulfhydryls that are critical for the cellular activities under various disease conditions. This review aims to provide an overview of the pathophysiological roles of surface and extracellular PDI and their underlying molecular mechanisms. Understanding the involvement of extracellular PDI in these diseases will advance our knowledge in the molecular aetiology to facilitate the development of novel pharmacological strategies by specifically targeting PDI in extracellular compartments.