Genetic Programming as a tool for identification of analyte-specificity from complex response patterns using a non-specific whole-cell biosensor.
Biosens Bioelectron 2012;
33:254-9. [PMID:
22325714 DOI:
10.1016/j.bios.2012.01.015]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2011] [Revised: 01/09/2012] [Accepted: 01/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Whole-cell biosensors are mostly non-specific with respect to their detection capabilities for toxicants, and therefore offering an interesting perspective in environmental monitoring. However, to fully employ this feature, a robust classification method needs to be implemented into these sensor systems to allow further identification of detected substances. Substance-specific information can be extracted from signals derived from biosensors harbouring one or multiple biological components. Here, a major task is the identification of substance-specific information among considerable amounts of biosensor data. For this purpose, several approaches make use of statistical methods or machine learning algorithms. Genetic Programming (GP), a heuristic machine learning technique offers several advantages compared to other machine learning approaches and consequently may be a promising tool for biosensor data classification. In the present study, we have evaluated the use of GP for the classification of herbicides and herbicide classes (chemical classes) by analysis of substance-specific patterns derived from a whole-cell multi-species biosensor. We re-analysed data from a previously described array-based biosensor system employing diverse microalgae (Podola and Melkonian, 2005), aiming on the identification of five individual herbicides as well as two herbicide classes. GP analyses were performed using the commercially available GP software 'Discipulus', resulting in classifiers (computer programs) for the binary classification of each individual herbicide or herbicide class. GP-generated classifiers both for individual herbicides and herbicide classes were able to perform a statistically significant identification of herbicides or herbicide classes, respectively. The majority of classifiers were able to perform correct classifications (sensitivity) of about 80-95% of test data sets, whereas the false positive rate (specificity) was lower than 20% for most classifiers. Results suggest that a higher number of data sets may lead to a better classification performance. In the present paper, GP-based classification was combined with a biosensor for the first time. Our results demonstrate GP was able to identify substance-specific information within complex biosensor response patterns and furthermore use this information for successful toxicant classification in unknown samples. This suggests further research to assess perspectives and limitations of this approach in the field of biosensors.
Collapse