1
|
Saugel B, Annecke T, Bein B, Flick M, Goepfert M, Gruenewald M, Habicher M, Jungwirth B, Koch T, Kouz K, Meidert AS, Pestel G, Renner J, Sakka SG, Sander M, Treskatsch S, Zitzmann A, Reuter DA. Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery: Guidelines of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine in collaboration with the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies. J Clin Monit Comput 2024; 38:945-959. [PMID: 38381359 PMCID: PMC11427556 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-024-01132-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Haemodynamic monitoring and management are cornerstones of perioperative care. The goal of haemodynamic management is to maintain organ function by ensuring adequate perfusion pressure, blood flow, and oxygen delivery. We here present guidelines on "Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery" that were prepared by 18 experts on behalf of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und lntensivmedizin; DGAI).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd Saugel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Thorsten Annecke
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Hospital of the University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany
| | - Berthold Bein
- Department for Anaesthesiology, Asklepios Hospital Hamburg St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Flick
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Goepfert
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Alexianer St. Hedwigkliniken Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Gruenewald
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Evangelisches Amalie Sieveking Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marit Habicher
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Bettina Jungwirth
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tilo Koch
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Karim Kouz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Agnes S Meidert
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gunther Pestel
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jochen Renner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Municipal Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Samir G Sakka
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein gGmbH, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Michael Sander
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Sascha Treskatsch
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Amelie Zitzmann
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Daniel A Reuter
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gregory A, Ender J, Shaw AD, Denault A, Ibekwe S, Stoppe C, Alli A, Manning MW, Brodt JL, Galhardo C, Sander M, Zarbock A, Fletcher N, Ghadimi K, Grant MC. ERAS/STS 2024 Expert Consensus Statement on Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: Continuing the Evolution of Optimized Patient Care and Recovery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2024; 38:2155-2162. [PMID: 39004570 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Gregory
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Joerg Ender
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heartcenter Leipzig GmbH, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andrew D Shaw
- Department of Intensive Care and Resuscitation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - André Denault
- Montreal Heart Institute, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Stephanie Ibekwe
- Department of Anesthesiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Christian Stoppe
- Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ahmad Alli
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jessica L Brodt
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto CA
| | - Carlos Galhardo
- Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Sander
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Alexander Zarbock
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Nick Fletcher
- Institute of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Cleveland Clinic London, London, UK
| | | | - Michael C Grant
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nicklas JY, Bergholz A, Däke F, Pham HH, Rabe MC, Schlichting H, Skrovanek S, Flick M, Kouz K, Fischer M, Olotu C, Izbicki JR, Mann O, Fisch M, Schmalfeldt B, Frosch KH, Renné T, Krause L, Zöllner C, Saugel B. Personalised blood pressure management during major noncardiac surgery and postoperative neurocognitive disorders: a randomised trial. BJA OPEN 2024; 11:100294. [PMID: 39050403 PMCID: PMC11267063 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Background It remains unknown whether there is a causal relationship between intraoperative hypotension and postoperative neurocognitive disorders. We tested the hypothesis that personalised-compared to routine-intraoperative blood pressure management reduces the incidence of postoperative neurocognitive disorders in patients having major noncardiac surgery. Methods In this single-centre trial, 328 elective major noncardiac surgery patients were randomly allocated to receive personalised blood pressure management (i.e. maintaining intraoperative mean arterial pressure [MAP] above preoperative baseline MAP from automated 24-h blood pressure monitoring) or routine blood pressure management (i.e. maintaining MAP above 65 mm Hg). The primary outcome was the incidence of neurocognitive disorders (composite of delayed neurocognitive recovery and delirium) between postoperative days 3 and 7. Results The primary outcome, neurocognitive disorders, occurred in 18 of 147 patients (12%) assigned to personalised and 21 of 148 patients (14%) assigned to routine blood pressure management (odds ratio [OR]=0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-1.75, P=0.622). Delayed neurocognitive recovery occurred in 17 of 146 patients (12%) assigned to personalised and 17 of 145 patients (12%) assigned to routine blood pressure management (OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.45-2.17, P=0.983). Delirium occurred in 2 of 157 patients (1%) assigned to personalised and 4 of 158 patients (3%) assigned to routine blood pressure management (OR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.04-3.53, P=0.684). Conclusions Personalised intraoperative blood pressure management maintaining preoperative baseline MAP neither reduced the incidence of the composite primary outcome neurocognitive disorders between postoperative days 3 and 7 nor the incidences of the components of the composite primary outcome-delayed neurocognitive recovery and delirium-compared to routine blood pressure management in patients having major noncardiac surgery. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03442907).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Y. Nicklas
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alina Bergholz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Däke
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hanh H.D. Pham
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marie-Christin Rabe
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hanna Schlichting
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sophia Skrovanek
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Flick
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karim Kouz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Marlene Fischer
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cynthia Olotu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jakob R. Izbicki
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Mann
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Schmalfeldt
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karl-Heinz Frosch
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Renné
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Irish Centre for Vascular Biology, School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Linda Krause
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Zöllner
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Saugel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Edwards MR. Individualising goal-directed haemodynamic therapy: future iterations will require novel trial designs. Br J Anaesth 2024; 133:241-244. [PMID: 38876923 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.04.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Variants of perioperative cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy algorithms have been tested over the last few decades, without clear evidence of effectiveness. Newer approaches have focussed on individualisation of physiological targets and have been tested in early efficacy trials. Uncertainty about the benefits remains. Adoption of novel trial designs could overcome the limitations of smaller trials of this complex intervention and accelerate the exploration of future developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark R Edwards
- Department of Anaesthesia, Southampton General Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Perioperative & Critical Care Research Group, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust/University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Funcke S, Schmidt G, Bergholz A, Argente Navarro P, Azparren Cabezón G, Barbero-Espinosa S, Diaz-Cambronero O, Edinger F, García-Gregorio N, Habicher M, Klinkmann G, Koch C, Kröker A, Mencke T, Moral García V, Zitzmann A, Lezius S, Pepić A, Sessler DI, Sander M, Haas SA, Reuter DA, Saugel B. Cardiac index-guided therapy to maintain optimised postinduction cardiac index in high-risk patients having major open abdominal surgery: the multicentre randomised iPEGASUS trial. Br J Anaesth 2024; 133:277-287. [PMID: 38797635 PMCID: PMC11282469 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.03.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear whether optimising intraoperative cardiac index can reduce postoperative complications. We tested the hypothesis that maintaining optimised postinduction cardiac index during and for the first 8 h after surgery reduces the incidence of a composite outcome of complications within 28 days after surgery compared with routine care in high-risk patients having elective major open abdominal surgery. METHODS In three German and two Spanish centres, high-risk patients having elective major open abdominal surgery were randomised to cardiac index-guided therapy to maintain optimised postinduction cardiac index (cardiac index at which pulse pressure variation was <12%) during and for the first 8 h after surgery using intravenous fluids and dobutamine or to routine care. The primary outcome was the incidence of a composite outcome of moderate or severe complications within 28 days after surgery. RESULTS We analysed 318 of 380 enrolled subjects. The composite primary outcome occurred in 84 of 152 subjects (55%) assigned to cardiac index-guided therapy and in 77 of 166 subjects (46%) assigned to routine care (odds ratio: 1.87, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-3.39, P=0.038). Per-protocol analyses confirmed the results of the primary outcome analysis. CONCLUSIONS Maintaining optimised postinduction cardiac index during and for the first 8 h after surgery did not reduce, and possibly increased, the incidence of a composite outcome of complications within 28 days after surgery compared with routine care in high-risk patients having elective major open abdominal surgery. Clinicians should not strive to maintain optimised postinduction cardiac index during and after surgery in expectation of reducing complications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03021525.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Funcke
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Götz Schmidt
- Department of Anesthesiology, Operative Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Alina Bergholz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pilar Argente Navarro
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Gonzalo Azparren Cabezón
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Barbero-Espinosa
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oscar Diaz-Cambronero
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Fabian Edinger
- Department of Anesthesiology, Operative Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Nuria García-Gregorio
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marit Habicher
- Department of Anesthesiology, Operative Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Gerd Klinkmann
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Rostock, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Department of Extracorporeal Therapy Systems, Rostock, Germany
| | - Christian Koch
- Department of Anesthesiology, Operative Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Alina Kröker
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Mencke
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Victoria Moral García
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Amelie Zitzmann
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Susanne Lezius
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Amra Pepić
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Daniel I Sessler
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Department of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael Sander
- Department of Anesthesiology, Operative Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Sebastian A Haas
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Daniel A Reuter
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Bernd Saugel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Behem CR, Friedheim T, Holthusen H, Rapp A, Suntrop T, Graessler MF, Pinnschmidt HO, Wipper SH, von Lucadou M, Schwedhelm E, Renné T, Pfister K, Schierling W, Trepte CJC. Goal-directed colloid versus crystalloid therapy and microcirculatory blood flow following ischemia/reperfusion. Microvasc Res 2024; 152:104630. [PMID: 38048876 DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2023.104630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ischemia/reperfusion can impair microcirculatory blood flow. It remains unknown whether colloids are superior to crystalloids for restoration of microcirculatory blood flow during ischemia/reperfusion injury. We tested the hypothesis that goal-directed colloid - compared to crystalloid - therapy improves small intestinal, renal, and hepatic microcirculatory blood flow in pigs with ischemia/reperfusion injury. METHODS This was a randomized trial in 32 pigs. We induced ischemia/reperfusion by supra-celiac aortic-cross-clamping. Pigs were randomized to receive either goal-directed isooncotic hydroxyethyl-starch colloid or balanced isotonic crystalloid therapy. Microcirculatory blood flow was measured using Laser-Speckle-Contrast-Imaging. The primary outcome was small intestinal, renal, and hepatic microcirculatory blood flow 4.5 h after ischemia/reperfusion. Secondary outcomes included small intestinal, renal, and hepatic histopathological damage, macrohemodynamic and metabolic variables, as well as specific biomarkers of tissue injury, renal, and hepatic function and injury, and endothelial barrier function. RESULTS Small intestinal microcirculatory blood flow was higher in pigs assigned to isooncotic hydroxyethyl-starch colloid therapy than in pigs assigned to balanced isotonic crystalloid therapy (768.7 (677.2-860.1) vs. 595.6 (496.3-694.8) arbitrary units, p = .007). There were no important differences in renal (509.7 (427.2-592.1) vs. 442.1 (361.2-523.0) arbitrary units, p = .286) and hepatic (604.7 (507.7-701.8) vs. 548.7 (444.0-653.3) arbitrary units, p = .376) microcirculatory blood flow between groups. Pigs assigned to colloid - compared to crystalloid - therapy also had less small intestinal, but not renal and hepatic, histopathological damage. CONCLUSIONS Goal-directed isooncotic hydroxyethyl-starch colloid - compared to balanced isotonic crystalloid - therapy improved small intestinal, but not renal and hepatic, microcirculatory blood flow in pigs with ischemia/reperfusion injury. Whether colloid therapy improves small intestinal microcirculatory blood flow in patients with ischemia/reperfusion needs to be investigated in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph R Behem
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Till Friedheim
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hannes Holthusen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Adina Rapp
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Timo Suntrop
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael F Graessler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans O Pinnschmidt
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sabine H Wipper
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg (UHZ), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mirjam von Lucadou
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Edzard Schwedhelm
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Renné
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Irish Centre for Vascular Biology, School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Karin Pfister
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Wilma Schierling
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Constantin J C Trepte
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Coeckelenbergh S, Vincent JL, Duranteau J, Joosten A, Rinehart J. Perioperative Fluid and Vasopressor Therapy in 2050: From Experimental Medicine to Personalization Through Automation. Anesth Analg 2024; 138:284-294. [PMID: 38215708 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
Intravenous (IV) fluids and vasopressor agents are key components of hemodynamic management. Since their introduction, their use in the perioperative setting has continued to evolve, and we are now on the brink of automated administration. IV fluid therapy was first described in Scotland during the 1832 cholera epidemic, when pioneers in medicine saved critically ill patients dying from hypovolemic shock. However, widespread use of IV fluids only began in the 20th century. Epinephrine was discovered and purified in the United States at the end of the 19th century, but its short half-life limited its implementation into patient care. Advances in venous access, including the introduction of the central venous catheter, and the ability to administer continuous infusions of fluids and vasopressors rather than just boluses, facilitated the use of fluids and adrenergic agents. With the advent of advanced hemodynamic monitoring, most notably the pulmonary artery catheter, the role of fluids and vasopressors in the maintenance of tissue oxygenation through adequate cardiac output and perfusion pressure became more clearly established, and hemodynamic goals could be established to better titrate fluid and vasopressor therapy. Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring techniques, using echography, pulse contour analysis, and heart-lung interactions, have facilitated hemodynamic monitoring at the bedside. Most recently, advances have been made in closed-loop fluid and vasopressor therapy, which apply computer assistance to interpret hemodynamic variables and therapy. Development and increased use of artificial intelligence will likely represent a major step toward fully automated hemodynamic management in the perioperative environment in the near future. In this narrative review, we discuss the key events in experimental medicine that have led to the current status of fluid and vasopressor therapies and describe the potential benefits that future automation has to offer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Coeckelenbergh
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Paris, France
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jean-Louis Vincent
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jacques Duranteau
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Paris, France
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital De Bicêtre, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Joosten
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Paris, France
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital De Bicêtre, Paris, France
| | - Joseph Rinehart
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care, University of California, Irvine, California
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Saugel B, Hoste E, Chew MS. A global perspective on acute kidney injury after major surgery: much needed insights and sobering results. Intensive Care Med 2023; 49:1508-1510. [PMID: 37906259 PMCID: PMC10709254 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07250-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd Saugel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Eric Hoste
- Intensive Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Michelle S Chew
- Departments of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yoon HK, Hur M, Kim DH, Ku JH, Kim JT. The effect of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:339. [PMID: 37814224 PMCID: PMC10561433 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02285-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the effects of intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing open radical cystectomy. METHODS This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial included 82 patients scheduled for open radical cystectomy between September 2018 and November 2021. The GDHT group (n = 39) received the stroke volume index- and cardiac index-based hemodynamic management using advanced hemodynamic monitoring, while the control group (n = 36) received the standard care under the discretion of attending anesthesiologists during surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of a composite of in-hospital postoperative complications during hospital stays. RESULTS A total of 75 patients were included in the final analysis. There was no significant difference in the incidence of in-hospital postoperative complications (28/39 [71.8%] vs. 30/36 [83.3%], risk difference [95% CI], -0.12 [-0.30 to 0.07], P = 0.359) between the groups. The amounts of intraoperative fluid administered were similar between the groups (2700 [2175-3250] vs. 2900 [1950-3700] ml, median difference [95% CI] -200 [-875 to 825], P = 0.714). The secondary outcomes, including the incidence of seven major postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, duration of intensive care unit stay, and grade of complications, were comparable between the two groups. Trends in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine, and C-reactive protein did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative GDHT did not reduce the incidence of postoperative in-hospital complications during the hospital stay in patients who underwent open radical cystectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered at http://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov (Registration number: NCT03505112; date of registration: 23/04/2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun-Kyu Yoon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Min Hur
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Hyuk Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Tae Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ripollés-Melchor J, Colomina MJ, Aldecoa C, Clau-Terre F, Galán-Menéndez P, Jiménez-López I, Jover-Pinillos JL, Lorente JV, Monge García MI, Tomé-Roca JL, Yanes G, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Escaraman D, García-Fernández J. A critical review of the perioperative fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery of the Adult Pathway (RICA): A position statement of the fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring Subcommittee of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section (SHTF) of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SEDAR). REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION 2023; 70:458-466. [PMID: 37669701 DOI: 10.1016/j.redare.2022.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
In an effort to standardize perioperative management and improve postoperative outcomes of adult patients undergoing surgery, the Ministry of Health, through the Spanish Multimodal Rehabilitation Group (GERM), and the Aragonese Institute of Health Sciences, in collaboration with multiple Spanish scientific societies and based on the available evidence, published in 2021 the Spanish Intensified Adult Recovery (RICA) guideline. This document includes 12 perioperative measures related to fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring. Fluid administration and hemodynamic monitoring are not straightforward but are directly related to postoperative patient outcomes. The Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring Subcommittee of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section (SHTF) of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SEDAR) has reviewed these recommendations and concluded that they should be revised as they do not follow an adequate methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - M J Colomina
- Grupo de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización Hemodinámica de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Aldecoa
- Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal (ReDGERM), Zaragoza, Spain; Grupo de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización Hemodinámica de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - F Clau-Terre
- Grupo de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización Hemodinámica de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Galán-Menéndez
- Grupo de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización Hemodinámica de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Jiménez-López
- Grupo de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización Hemodinámica de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - J L Jover-Pinillos
- Grupo de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización Hemodinámica de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Virgen de los Lirios, Alcoy, Spain
| | - J V Lorente
- Grupo de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización Hemodinámica de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain
| | - M I Monge García
- Grupo de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización Hemodinámica de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain
| | - J L Tomé-Roca
- Grupo de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización Hemodinámica de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - G Yanes
- Grupo de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización Hemodinámica de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - A Zorrilla-Vaca
- Grupo de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización Hemodinámica de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - D Escaraman
- Centro Médico Nacional La Raza, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - J García-Fernández
- Grupo de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización Hemodinámica de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Middel C, Stetzuhn M, Sander N, Kalkbrenner B, Tigges T, Pielmus AG, Spies C, Pietzner K, Klum M, von Haefen C, Hunsicker O, Sehouli J, Konietschke F, Feldheiser A. Perioperative advanced haemodynamic monitoring of patients undergoing multivisceral debulking surgery: an observational pilot study. Intensive Care Med Exp 2023; 11:61. [PMID: 37682496 PMCID: PMC10491568 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-023-00543-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing high-risk surgery show haemodynamic instability and an increased risk of morbidity. However, most of the available data concentrate on the intraoperative period. This study aims to characterise patients with advanced haemodynamic monitoring throughout the whole perioperative period using electrical cardiometry. METHODS In a prospective, observational, monocentric pilot study, electrical cardiometry measurements were obtained using an Osypka ICON™ monitor before surgery, during surgery, and repeatedly throughout the hospital stay for 30 patients with primary ovarian cancer undergoing multivisceral cytoreductive surgery. Severe postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification were used as a grouping criterion. RESULTS The relative change from the baseline to the first intraoperative timepoint showed a reduced heart rate (HR, median - 19 [25-quartile - 26%; 75-quartile - 10%]%, p < 0.0001), stroke volume index (SVI, - 9.5 [- 15.3; 3.2]%, p = 0.0038), cardiac index (CI, - 24.5 [- 32; - 13]%, p < 0.0001) and index of contractility (- 17.5 [- 35.3; - 0.8]%, p < 0.0001). Throughout the perioperative course, patients had intraoperatively a reduced HR and CI (both p < 0.0001) and postoperatively an increased HR (p < 0.0001) and CI (p = 0.016), whereas SVI was unchanged. Thoracic fluid volume increased continuously versus preoperative values and did not normalise up to the day of discharge. Patients having postoperative complications showed a lower index of contractility (p = 0.0435) and a higher systolic time ratio (p = 0.0008) over the perioperative course in comparison to patients without complications, whereas the CI (p = 0.3337) was comparable between groups. One patient had to be excluded from data analysis for not receiving the planned surgery. CONCLUSIONS Substantial decreases in HR, SVI, CI, and index of contractility occurred from the day before surgery to the first intraoperative timepoint. HR and CI were altered throughout the perioperative course. Patients with postoperative complications differed from patients without complications in the markers of cardiac function, a lower index of contractility and a lower SVI. The analyses of trends over the whole perioperative time course by using non-invasive technologies like EC seem to be useful to identify patients with altered haemodynamic parameters and therefore at an increased risk for postoperative complications after major surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Middel
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Stetzuhn
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nadine Sander
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Björn Kalkbrenner
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Timo Tigges
- Department of Electronics and Medical Signal Processing, Technical University, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Claudia Spies
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Pietzner
- Department of Gynaecology With Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Klum
- Department of Electronics and Medical Signal Processing, Technical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Clarissa von Haefen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Hunsicker
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynaecology With Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Konietschke
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aarne Feldheiser
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung/Knappschaft, 45136, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Baykuziyev T, Khan MJ, Karmakar A, Baloch MA. Closed-Loop Pharmacologic Control of Blood Pressure: A Review of Existing Systems. Cureus 2023; 15:e45188. [PMID: 37842385 PMCID: PMC10576018 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Blood pressure management is a critical aspect of patient care, particularly in surgical and critical care settings. Closed-loop systems, which utilize real-time data and feedback to adjust treatment interventions, have gained attention for their potential to enhance blood pressure control. This review explores the application of closed-loop systems in blood pressure management. We discuss various closed-loop approaches, including their mechanisms, benefits, and limitations. By harnessing real-time patient data and feedback, closed-loop systems can tailor interventions dynamically, thus enhancing blood pressure regulation. Additionally, we examine the integration of advanced monitoring technologies and artificial intelligence algorithms in closed-loop systems. The review highlights recent studies and their findings, emphasizing the evolving landscape of closed-loop blood pressure management across different clinical scenarios. From the perioperative period to critical care settings, closed-loop systems hold the potential to optimize patient outcomes by precisely adjusting vasopressor administration in response to continuous blood pressure fluctuations. By providing insights into the current state of closed-loop systems for blood pressure control, this review offers a comprehensive overview of their potential contributions to improved patient outcomes and future directions for research and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Temur Baykuziyev
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT
| | | | - Arunabha Karmakar
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bar S, Moussa MD, Descamps R, El Amine Y, Bouhemad B, Fischer MO, Lorne E, Dupont H, Diouf M, Guinot PG. Respiratory Exchange Ratio guided management in high-risk noncardiac surgery: The OPHIQUE multicentre randomised controlled trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2023; 42:101221. [PMID: 36958473 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a need to develop non-invasive markers to identify the occurrence of anaerobic metabolism in high-risk surgery. Our objective was to demonstrate that a goal-directed therapy algorithm incorporating the respiratory exchange ratio (ratio between CO2 production and O2 consumption) can reduce postoperative complications. METHODS We conducted a randomized, multicenter, controlled clinical trial in four university medical centers and one non-university hospital from December 26, 2018, to September 9, 2021. 350 patients with a high risk of postoperative complications undergoing high-risk noncardiac surgery lasting 2 h or longer under general anesthesia were enrolled. The control group was treated according to current hemodynamic guidelines. The interventional group was treated according to an algorithm based on the measurement of the respiratory exchange ratio. The primary outcome was a composite of major complications or death within seven days of surgery. The secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, and the total intraoperative volume of fluids administered. RESULTS The primary outcome occurred for 78 patients (45.6%) in the interventional group and 83 patients (48.8%) in the control group (relative risk: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-1.17; p = 0.55). There were no clinically relevant differences between the two groups for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In high-risk surgery, a goal-directed therapy algorithm integrating the measurement of the respiratory-exchange ratio did not reduce a composite outcome of major postoperative complications or death within seven days after surgery compared to routine care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03852147.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Bar
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Amiens University Medical Centre, Amiens, France; SSPC UPJV 7518 (Simplifications des Soins Patients Chirurgicaux Complexes - Simplification of Care of Complex Surgical Patients) Clinical Research Unit, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
| | - Mouhamed Djahoum Moussa
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Lille University Medical Centre, Lille, France
| | - Richard Descamps
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Caen University Medical Center, Caen, France
| | - Younes El Amine
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Valenciennes Medical Center, Valenciennes, France
| | - Belaid Bouhemad
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Dijon University Medical Centre, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, LNC UMR1231, Dijon, France
| | - Marc-Olivier Fischer
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Caen University Medical Center, Caen, France; Saint Augustin Clinic, Bordeaux, France
| | - Emmanuel Lorne
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Millénaire Clinic, Montpellier, France
| | - Hervé Dupont
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Amiens University Medical Centre, Amiens, France; SSPC UPJV 7518 (Simplifications des Soins Patients Chirurgicaux Complexes - Simplification of Care of Complex Surgical Patients) Clinical Research Unit, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - Momar Diouf
- Biostatistical Unit, Direction de la Recherche Clinique, University Hospital of Amiens Picardy, Amiens, France
| | - Pierre Grégoire Guinot
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Dijon University Medical Centre, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, LNC UMR1231, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bloc S, Alfonsi P, Belbachir A, Beaussier M, Bouvet L, Campard S, Campion S, Cazenave L, Diemunsch P, Di Maria S, Dufour G, Fabri S, Fletcher D, Garnier M, Godier A, Grillo P, Huet O, Joosten A, Lasocki S, Le Guen M, Le Saché F, Macquer I, Marquis C, de Montblanc J, Maurice-Szamburski A, Nguyen YL, Ruscio L, Zieleskiewicz L, Caillard A, Weiss E. Guidelines on perioperative optimization protocol for the adult patient 2023. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2023; 42:101264. [PMID: 37295649 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The French Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine [Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR)] aimed at providing guidelines for the implementation of perioperative optimization programs. DESIGN A consensus committee of 29 experts from the SFAR was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. METHODS Four fields were defined: 1) Generalities on perioperative optimization programs; 2) Preoperative measures; 3) Intraoperative measures and; 4) Postoperative measures. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer a number of questions formulated according to the PICO model (population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out using predefined keywords according to PRISMA guidelines and analyzed using the GRADE® methodology. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE® methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method. As the GRADE® methodology could have been fully applied for the vast majority of questions, the recommendations were formulated using a "formalized expert recommendations" format. RESULTS The experts' work on synthesis and application of the GRADE® method resulted in 30 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 were found to have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and ten a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). For one recommendation, the GRADE methodology could not be fully applied, resulting in an expert opinion. Two questions did not find any response in the literature. After two rounds of rating and several amendments, strong agreement was reached for all the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Strong agreement among the experts was obtained to provide 30 recommendations for the elaboration and/or implementation of perioperative optimization programs in the highest number of surgical fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Bloc
- Clinical Research Department, Ambroise Pare Hospital Group, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France; Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique Drouot Sport, Paris, France.
| | - Pascal Alfonsi
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Paris Descartes, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, F-75674 Paris Cedex 14, France
| | - Anissa Belbachir
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, UF Douleur, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, APHP.Centre, Site Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Marc Beaussier
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Lionel Bouvet
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Lyon, France
| | | | - Sébastien Campion
- AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, F-75013 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Laure Cazenave
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Groupe Jeunes, French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR), 75016 Paris, France
| | - Pierre Diemunsch
- Unité de Réanimation Chirurgicale, Service d'Anesthésie-réanimation Chirurgicale, Pôle Anesthésie-Réanimations Chirurgicales, Samu-Smur, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, Avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Sophie Di Maria
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Dufour
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU de Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Fabri
- Faculty of Economics, Management & Accountancy, University of Malta, Malta
| | - Dominique Fletcher
- Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Ambroise-Paré, Service d'Anesthésie, 9, Avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Marc Garnier
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Périopératoire Rive Droite, Paris, France
| | - Anne Godier
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | | | - Olivier Huet
- CHU de Brest, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Brest, France
| | - Alexandre Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Villejuif, France
| | | | - Morgan Le Guen
- Paris Saclay University, Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - Frédéric Le Saché
- Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique Drouot Sport, Paris, France; DMU DREAM Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Macquer
- Bordeaux University Hospitals, Bordeaux, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Department, Bordeaux, France
| | - Constance Marquis
- Clinique du Sport, Département d'Anesthésie et Réanimation, Médipole Garonne, 45 rue de Gironis - CS 13 624, 31036 Toulouse Cedex 1, France
| | - Jacques de Montblanc
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | | | - Yên-Lan Nguyen
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, Cochin Academic Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Laura Ruscio
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; INSERM U 1195, Université Paris-Saclay, Saint-Aubin, Île-de-France, France
| | - Laurent Zieleskiewicz
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, C2VN, France
| | - Anaîs Caillard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Cavale Blanche Université de Bretagne Ouest, Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Department, Brest, France
| | - Emmanuel Weiss
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP, Nord, Clichy, France; University of Paris, Paris, France; Inserm UMR_S1149, Centre for Research on Inflammation, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Saugel B, Thomsen KK, Maheshwari K. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy: an imprecise umbrella term to avoid. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130:390-393. [PMID: 36732140 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
'Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy' describes various haemodynamic treatment strategies that have in common that interventions are titrated to achieve predefined haemodynamic targets. However, the treatment strategies differ substantially regarding the underlying haemodynamic target variables and target values, and thus presumably have different effects on outcome. It is an over-simplifying approach to lump complex and substantially differing haemodynamic treatment strategies together under the term 'goal-directed haemodynamic therapy', an imprecise umbrella term that we should thus stop using.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd Saugel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Kristen K Thomsen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kamal Maheshwari
- Department of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of General Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kouz K, Bergholz A, Diener O, Leistenschneider M, Thompson C, Pichotka F, Trepte C, Schwedhelm E, Renné T, Krause L, Nicklas JY, Saugel B. Effect of intraoperative personalized goal-directed hemodynamic management on acute myocardial injury in high-risk patients having major abdominal surgery: a post-hoc secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Monit Comput 2022; 36:1775-1783. [PMID: 35201549 PMCID: PMC9637594 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00826-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Acute myocardial injury is common after noncardiac surgery and associated with mortality. Impaired intraoperative cardiovascular dynamics are a risk factor for acute myocardial injury. Optimizing intraoperative cardiovascular dynamics may thus reduce acute myocardial injury. We aimed to investigate the effect of intraoperative personalized goal-directed hemodynamic management on the incidence of acute myocardial injury. We hypothesized that personalized goal-directed hemodynamic management reduces the incidence of acute myocardial injury compared to routine hemodynamic management in high-risk patients having major abdominal surgery. We performed a post-hoc secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial including 180 high-risk major abdominal surgery patients that were randomized to personalized goal-directed hemodynamic management or routine hemodynamic management. We compared the incidences of acute myocardial injury-defined according to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018)-between patients randomized to personalized goal-directed hemodynamic management or routine hemodynamic management by calculating the relative and absolute risk reduction together with 95% Wald confidence intervals and P values. Acute myocardial injury occurred in 4 of 90 patients (4%) in the personalized goal-directed hemodynamic management group and in 12 of 90 patients (13%) in the routine hemodynamic management group (relative risk: 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.11 to 0.99, P = 0.036; absolute risk reduction: - 9%, 95% confidence interval: - 17% to - 0.68%, P = 0.034). In this post-hoc secondary analysis, intraoperative personalized goal-directed hemodynamic management reduced the incidence of acute myocardial injury compared to routine hemodynamic management in high-risk patients having major abdominal surgery. This needs to be confirmed in larger prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Kouz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alina Bergholz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Diener
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Leistenschneider
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christina Thompson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Friederike Pichotka
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Constantin Trepte
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Edzard Schwedhelm
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Renné
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.,Irish Centre for Vascular Biology, School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Linda Krause
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julia Y Nicklas
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Saugel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. .,Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kang S, Chae YJ, Park SK, Kim TG, Joe HB. Prevention of Bradycardia during Spinal Anesthesia under Dexmedetomidine Sedation in Older Adults. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11216349. [PMID: 36362576 PMCID: PMC9657617 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Older adults exhibit reduced physiological responses to beta-adrenergic stimulation and parasympathetic inhibition. This study aimed to investigate the effect of reducing the incidence of bradycardia in the atropine and ephedrine pretreatment group compared to the control group in older adults who received spinal anesthesia with intravenous dexmedetomidine. Overall, 102 older adults aged over 65 years were randomly divided into three groups, and saline (control group), atropine at 0.5 mg (atropine group), and ephedrine at 8 mg (ephedrine group) were administered intravenously to each group as pretreatment. Immediately after spinal anesthesia, dexmedetomidine loading and study drug injections were commenced. The primary outcome was the incidence of bradycardia (<50 beats per min) within 60 min following dexmedetomidine loading. The incidence of bradycardia requiring atropine treatment was significantly higher in the control group than in the atropine and ephedrine groups (27.3% vs. 6.1% and 8.8%, respectively; p = 0.035), and no difference was noted between the atropine and ephedrine groups. Therefore, if ephedrine or atropine is selected and used according to the patient’s condition and clinical situation, it may be helpful in preventing bradycardia during spinal anesthesia using dexmedetomidine in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyoon Kang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Korea
| | - Yun Jeong Chae
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Korea
| | - Sun Kyung Park
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeju National College of Medicine, Jeju 63241, Korea
| | - Taek Geun Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Korea
| | - Han Bum Joe
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Korea
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-31-219-4916
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Halvorsen S, Mehilli J, Cassese S, Hall TS, Abdelhamid M, Barbato E, De Hert S, de Laval I, Geisler T, Hinterbuchner L, Ibanez B, Lenarczyk R, Mansmann UR, McGreavy P, Mueller C, Muneretto C, Niessner A, Potpara TS, Ristić A, Sade LE, Schirmer H, Schüpke S, Sillesen H, Skulstad H, Torracca L, Tutarel O, Van Der Meer P, Wojakowski W, Zacharowski K. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:3826-3924. [PMID: 36017553 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 287] [Impact Index Per Article: 143.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
19
|
Pinsky MR, Cecconi M, Chew MS, De Backer D, Douglas I, Edwards M, Hamzaoui O, Hernandez G, Martin G, Monnet X, Saugel B, Scheeren TWL, Teboul JL, Vincent JL. Effective hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care 2022; 26:294. [PMID: 36171594 PMCID: PMC9520790 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-04173-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractHemodynamic monitoring is the centerpiece of patient monitoring in acute care settings. Its effectiveness in terms of improved patient outcomes is difficult to quantify. This review focused on effectiveness of monitoring-linked resuscitation strategies from: (1) process-specific monitoring that allows for non-specific prevention of new onset cardiovascular insufficiency (CVI) in perioperative care. Such goal-directed therapy is associated with decreased perioperative complications and length of stay in high-risk surgery patients. (2) Patient-specific personalized resuscitation approaches for CVI. These approaches including dynamic measures to define volume responsiveness and vasomotor tone, limiting less fluid administration and vasopressor duration, reduced length of care. (3) Hemodynamic monitoring to predict future CVI using machine learning approaches. These approaches presently focus on predicting hypotension. Future clinical trials assessing hemodynamic monitoring need to focus on process-specific monitoring based on modifying therapeutic interventions known to improve patient-centered outcomes.
Collapse
|
20
|
Flick M, Jobeir A, Hoppe P, Kubik M, Rogge DE, Schulte-Uentrop L, Kouz K, Saugel B. A new noninvasive finger sensor (NICCI system) for cardiac output monitoring: A method comparison study in patients after cardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2022; 39:695-700. [PMID: 35792895 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The new noninvasive finger sensor system NICCI (Getinge; Gothenburg, Sweden) allows continuous cardiac output monitoring. We aimed to investigate its cardiac output measurement performance. OBJECTIVES To investigate the NICCI system's cardiac output measurement performance. DESIGN Prospective method comparison study. SETTING University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. PATIENTS Fifty-one patients after cardiac surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We performed a method comparison study in 51 patients after cardiac surgery to compare NICCI cardiac output (CO NICCI ) and NICCI cardiac output calibrated to pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output measurement (CO NICCI-CAL ) with pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output (CO PAT ). As a secondary analysis we also compared CNAP cardiac output (CO CNAP ) and externally calibrated CNAP cardiac output (CO CNAP-CAL ) with CO PAT . RESULTS We analysed 299 cardiac output measurement pairs. The mean of the differences (95% limits of agreement) between CO NICCI and CO PAT was 0.6 (-1.8 to 3.1) l min -1 with a percentage error of 48%. The mean of the differences between CO NICCI-CAL and CO PAT was -0.4 (-1.9 to 1.1) l min -1 with a percentage error of 29%. The mean of the differences between CO CNAP and CO PAT was 1.0 (-1.8 to 3.8) l min -1 with a percentage error of 53%. The mean of the differences between CO CNAP-CAL and CO PAT was -0.2 (-2.0 to 1.6) l min -1 with a percentage error of 35%. CONCLUSION The agreement between CO NICCI and CO PAT is not clinically acceptable. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered in the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00023189) after inclusion of the first patient on October 2, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Flick
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (MF, AJ, PH, DER, LSU, KK, BS), the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (MK), the Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (MK), the Clinic of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany (DER) and the Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA (BS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Song Q, Li J, Jiang Z. Provisional Decision-Making for Perioperative Blood Pressure Management: A Narrative Review. OXIDATIVE MEDICINE AND CELLULAR LONGEVITY 2022; 2022:5916040. [PMID: 35860431 PMCID: PMC9293529 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5916040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Blood pressure (BP) is a basic determinant for organ blood flow supply. Insufficient blood supply will cause tissue hypoxia, provoke cellular oxidative stress, and to some extent lead to organ injury. Perioperative BP is labile and dynamic, and intraoperative hypotension is common. It is unclear whether there is a causal relationship between intraoperative hypotension and organ injury. However, hypotension surely compromises perfusion and causes harm to some extent. Because the harm threshold remains unknown, various guidelines for intraoperative BP management have been proposed. With the pending definitions from robust randomized trials, it is reasonable to consider observational analyses suggesting that mean arterial pressures below 65 mmHg sustained for more than 15 minutes are associated with myocardial and renal injury. Advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence may facilitate the management of hemodynamics globally, including fluid administration, rather than BP alone. The previous mounting studies concentrated on associations between BP targets and adverse complications, whereas few studies were concerned about how to treat and multiple factors for decision-making. Hence, in this narrative review, we discussed the way of BP measurement and current knowledge about baseline BP extracting for surgical patients, highlighted the decision-making process for BP management with a view to providing pragmatic guidance for BP treatment in the clinical settings, and evaluated the merits of an automated blood control system in predicting hypotension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiliang Song
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Shaoxing, 312000 Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jipeng Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Shaoxing, 312000 Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Zongming Jiang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Shaoxing, 312000 Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Flick M, Schreiber TH, Montomoli J, Krause L, de Boer HD, Kouz K, Scheeren TWL, Ince C, Hilty MP, Saugel B. Microcirculatory tissue perfusion during general anaesthesia and noncardiac surgery: An observational study using incident dark field imaging with automated video analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2022; 39:582-590. [PMID: 35759291 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Handheld vital microscopy allows direct observation of red blood cells within the sublingual microcirculation. Automated analysis allows quantifying microcirculatory tissue perfusion variables - including tissue red blood cell perfusion (tRBCp), a functional variable integrating microcirculatory convection and diffusion capacities. OBJECTIVE We aimed to describe baseline microcirculatory tissue perfusion in patients presenting for elective noncardiac surgery and test that microcirculatory tissue perfusion is preserved during elective general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery. DESIGN Prospective observational study. SETTING University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. PATIENTS 120 elective noncardiac surgery patients (major abdominal, orthopaedic or trauma and minor urologic surgery) and 40 young healthy volunteers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We measured sublingual microcirculation using incident dark field imaging with automated analysis at baseline before induction of general anaesthesia, under general anaesthesia before surgical incision and every 30 min during surgery. We used incident the dark field imaging technology with a validated automated analysis software. RESULTS A total of 3687 microcirculation video sequences were analysed. Microcirculatory tissue perfusion variables varied substantially between individuals - but ranges were similar between patients and volunteers. Under general anaesthesia before surgical incision, there were no important changes in tRBCp, functional capillary density and capillary haematocrit compared with preinduction baseline. However, total vessel density was higher and red blood cell velocity and the proportion of perfused vessels were lower under general anaesthesia. There were no important changes in any microcirculatory tissue perfusion variables during surgery. CONCLUSION In patients presenting for elective noncardiac surgery, baseline microcirculatory tissue perfusion variables vary substantially between individuals - but ranges are similar to those in young healthy volunteers. Microcirculatory tissue perfusion is preserved during general anaesthesia and noncardiac surgery - when macrocirculatory haemodynamics are maintained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Flick
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (MF, THS, KK, BS), Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (JM, CI), Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Infermi Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy (JM), Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (LK), Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, Martini General Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (HDdB), Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (TWLS), Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (MH) and Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA (BS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yu J, Che L, Zhu A, Xu L, Huang Y. Goal-Directed Intraoperative Fluid Therapy Benefits Patients Undergoing Major Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: A Controlled Before-and-After Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:833273. [PMID: 35463383 PMCID: PMC9019364 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.833273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fluid management during major gynecologic oncology surgeries faces great challenges due to the distinctive characteristics of patients with gynecologic malignancies as well as features of the surgical procedure. Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been proven to be effective in reducing postoperative complications among major colorectal surgeries; however, the efficacy of GDFT has not been fully studied in gynecologic malignancy surgeries. This study aimed to discuss the influence of GDFT practice in patients undergoing major gynecologic oncology surgery. Methods This study was a controlled before-and-after study. From June 2015 to June 2018 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital, a total of 300 patients scheduled for elective laparotomy of gynecological malignancies were enrolled and chronologically allocated into two groups, with the earlier 150 patients in the control group and the latter 150 patients in the GDFT group. The GDFT protocol was applied by Vigileo/FloTrac monitoring of stroke volume and fluid responsiveness to guide intraoperative fluid infusion and the use of vasoactive agents. The primary outcome was postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery. The secondary outcome included length of stay and time of functional recovery. Results A total of 249 patients undergoing major gynecologic oncology surgery were analyzed in the study, with 129 in the control group and 120 patients in the GDFT group. Patients in the GDFT group had higher ASA classifications and more baseline comorbidities. GDFT patients received significantly less fluid infusion than the control group (15.8 vs. 17.9 ml/kg/h), while fluid loss was similar (6.9 vs. 7.1 ml/kg/h). GDFT was associated with decreased risk of postoperative complications (OR = 0.572, 95% CI 0.343 to 0.953, P = 0.032), especially surgical site infections (OR = 0.127, 95% CI 0.003 to 0.971, P = 0.037). The postoperative bowel function recovery and length of hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion Goal-directed intraoperative fluid therapy is associated with fewer postoperative complications in patients undergoing major gynecologic oncology surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiawen Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Che
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Afang Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Li Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuguang Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Agerskov M, Sørensen H, Højlund J, Kjær S, Secher NH, Foss NB. The effect of vasoconstriction on intestinal perfusion is determined by preload dependency: A prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2022; 66:713-721. [PMID: 35338646 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effects of vasoconstriction on cardiac stroke volume (SV) and indices of peripheral and intestinal perfusion are insufficiently described. METHODS In a non-randomized clinical study, 30 patients undergoing elective rectal surgery were exposed to modulation of preload. The primary endpoint was intestinal perfusion (flux), measured by single-point laser Doppler flowmetry. Secondary endpoints were central cardiovascular variables obtained by the LiDCO rapid monitor, the peripheral perfusion index (PPI) derived from the pulse oximetry signal and muscle (StO2 ) and cerebral oxygenation (ScO2 ) determined by near-infrared spectroscopy. RESULTS For the whole cohort (n = 30), administration of Phenylephrine during HUT induced a median [IQR] increase in SV by 22% [14-41], p = .003 and in mean arterial pressure (MAP) by 54% [31-62], p < .001, with no change in PPI, StO2 and ScO2 or flux. In patients who were preload dependent during HUT (stroke volume variation; SSV >10%; n = 23), administration of phenylephrine increased SV by 29% [12-43], p = .01 and MAP by 54% [33-63], p < .001, followed by an increase in intestinal perfusion flux by 60% [15-289], p = .05, while PPI, StO2 and ScO2 remained unchanged. For non-preload dependent patients (SSV <10%; n = 7), no changes in hemodynamic indices were seen besides an increase in MAP by 54% [33-58], p = .002. CONCLUSION The reflection of vasoconstrictive modulation of preload in systemic cardiovascular variables and indices of perfusion was dependent on preload responsiveness. Administration of phenylephrine to increase preload did not appear to compromise organ perfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Agerskov
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Hvidovre Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Henrik Sørensen
- Department of Anaesthesiology Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Jakob Højlund
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Hvidovre Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Søren Kjær
- Gastroenterology Surgical Section Hvidovre Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Niels H. Secher
- Department of Anaesthesiology Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Nicolai B. Foss
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Hvidovre Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jessen MK, Vallentin MF, Holmberg MJ, Bolther M, Hansen FB, Holst JM, Magnussen A, Hansen NS, Johannsen CM, Enevoldsen J, Jensen TH, Roessler LL, Lind PC, Klitholm MP, Eggertsen MA, Caap P, Boye C, Dabrowski KM, Vormfenne L, Høybye M, Henriksen J, Karlsson CM, Balleby IR, Rasmussen MS, Pælestik K, Granfeldt A, Andersen LW. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2022; 128:416-433. [PMID: 34916049 PMCID: PMC8900265 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery, there remain knowledge gaps regarding the effect of goal-directed haemodynamic therapy on patient-centred outcomes. METHODS Included clinical trials investigated goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery and reported at least one patient-centred postoperative outcome. PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles on March 8, 2021. Two investigators performed abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction, and bias assessment. The primary outcomes were mortality and hospital length of stay, whereas 15 postoperative complications were included based on availability. From a main pool of comparable trials, meta-analyses were performed on trials with homogenous outcome definitions. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). RESULTS The main pool consisted of 76 trials with intermediate risk of bias for most outcomes. Overall, goal-directed haemodynamic therapy might reduce mortality (odds ratio=0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 1.09) and shorten length of stay (mean difference=-0.72 days; 95% CI, -1.10 to -0.35) but with low certainty in the evidence. For both outcomes, larger effects favouring goal-directed haemodynamic therapy were seen in abdominal surgery, very high-risk surgery, and using targets based on preload variation by the respiratory cycle. However, formal tests for subgroup differences were not statistically significant. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy decreased risk of several postoperative outcomes, but only infectious outcomes and anastomotic leakage reached moderate certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia might decrease mortality, hospital length of stay, and several postoperative complications. Only infectious postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage reached moderate certainty in the evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie K Jessen
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mikael F Vallentin
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mathias J Holmberg
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Maria Bolther
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Johanne M Holst
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Niklas S Hansen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Thomas H Jensen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Narvik, Norway
| | - Lara L Roessler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Peter C Lind
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Maibritt P Klitholm
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mark A Eggertsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Philip Caap
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Caroline Boye
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karol M Dabrowski
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lasse Vormfenne
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maria Høybye
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jeppe Henriksen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Carl M Karlsson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ida R Balleby
- National Hospital of the Faroe Islands, Torshavn, Faroe Islands, Denmark
| | - Marie S Rasmussen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Kim Pælestik
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Asger Granfeldt
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars W Andersen
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Vokuhl C, Briesenick L, Saugel B. [Intraoperative Hemodynamic Monitoring and Management]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2022; 57:104-114. [PMID: 35172341 DOI: 10.1055/a-1390-3569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative deaths are a consequence of postoperative complications - including acute kidney injury and myocardial injury. Postoperative complications are associated with non-modifiable patient-specific risk factors (i.e., age, medical history), but also with potentially modifiable risk factors - including intraoperative hypotension and compromised intraoperative blood flow. Based on patient- and surgery-specific risk factors, the intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring strategy needs to be selected. Intraoperative hypotension is associated with postoperative organ failure and should thus be avoided. To optimize intraoperative hemodynamics, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic management has been proposed. Cardiac output-guided hemodynamic management aims at optimizing oxygen delivery using fluids, vasopressors, and inotropes. Cardiac output-guided hemodynamic management has been shown to reduce postoperative complications compared to routine hemodynamic management in high-risk patients having major surgery.
Collapse
|
27
|
Michard F, Futier E, Joosten A. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy: what else? Comment on Br J Anaesth 2022. Br J Anaesth 2022; 128:e286-e288. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
28
|
Kouz K, Bergholz A, Timmermann LM, Brockmann L, Flick M, Hoppe P, Briesenick L, Schulte-Uentrop L, Krause L, Maheshwari K, Sessler DI, Saugel B. The Relation Between Mean Arterial Pressure and Cardiac Index in Major Abdominal Surgery Patients: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. Anesth Analg 2021; 134:322-329. [PMID: 34854823 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac output is an important hemodynamic variable and determines oxygen delivery. In contrast to blood pressure, cardiac output is rarely measured even in high-risk surgical patients, suggesting that clinicians consider blood pressure to be a reasonable indicator of systemic blood flow. However, the relationship depends on constant vascular tone and volume, both of which routinely vary during anesthesia and surgery. We therefore tested the hypothesis that there is no clinically meaningful correlation between mean arterial pressure and cardiac index in major abdominal surgery patients. METHODS In this prospective observational study, we assessed the relationship between mean arterial pressure and cardiac index in 100 patients having major abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. RESULTS The pooled within-patient correlation coefficient calculated using meta-analysis methods was r = 0.34 (95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.40). Linear regression using a linear mixed effects model of cardiac index on mean arterial pressure revealed that cardiac index increases by 0.014 L·min-1·m-2 for each 1 mm Hg increase in mean arterial pressure. The 95% Wald confidence interval of this slope was 0.011 to 0.018 L·min-1·m-2·mm Hg-1 and thus within predefined equivalence margins of -0.03 and 0.03 L·min-1·m-2·mm Hg-1, thereby demonstrating lack of clinically meaningful association between mean arterial pressure and cardiac index. CONCLUSIONS There is no clinically meaningful correlation between mean arterial pressure and cardiac index in patients having major abdominal surgery. Intraoperative blood pressure is thus a poor surrogate for cardiac index.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Kouz
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
| | - Alina Bergholz
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
| | - Lea M Timmermann
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
| | - Lennart Brockmann
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
| | - Moritz Flick
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
| | - Phillip Hoppe
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
| | - Luisa Briesenick
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
| | - Leonie Schulte-Uentrop
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
| | - Linda Krause
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kamal Maheshwari
- Department of Outcomes Research.,Department of General Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Bernd Saugel
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.,Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
de Waal EEC, Frank M, Scheeren TWL, Kaufmann T, de Korte-de Boer D, Cox B, van Kuijk SMJ, Montenij LM, Buhre W. Perioperative goal-directed therapy in high-risk abdominal surgery. A multicenter randomized controlled superiority trial. J Clin Anesth 2021; 75:110506. [PMID: 34536718 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE The potential of perioperative goal-directed therapy (PGDT) to improve outcome after high-risk abdominal surgery remains subject of debate. In particular, there is a need for large, multicenter trials focusing on relevant patient outcomes to confirm the evidence found in small, single center studies including minor complications in their composite endpoints. The present study therefore aims to investigate the effect of an arterial waveform analysis based PGDT algorithm on the incidence of major complications including mortality after high-risk abdominal surgery. DESIGN Prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial. SETTING Operating theatres and Post-Anesthesia/Intensive Care units (PACU/ICU) of four tertiary hospitals in The Netherlands. PATIENTS A total number of 482 patients undergoing elective, abdominal surgery that is considered high-risk due to the extent of the procedure and/or patient comorbidities. INTERVENTIONS Hemodynamic therapy using an age-specific PGDT algorithm including cardiac index (CI) and stroke volume variation (SVV) measurements during a 24-h perioperative period starting at induction of anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS The average number of major complications (including mortality) within 30 days after surgery, the number of minor complications, hospital and PACU/ICU length of stay (LOS), amounts of fluids and vasoactive medications used. Complications were graded using the Accordion severity grading system. RESULTS The average number of major complications per patient was 0.79 (PGDT group) versus 0.69 (control group) (p = 0.195). There were no statistically significant differences in the number of minor complications, hospital LOS, PACU/ICU LOS, or grading of complications. Patients in the PGDT group received more fluids intraoperatively, more dobutamine intra- and postoperatively, while patients in the control group received more phenylephrine during the operation. CONCLUSIONS PGDT based on a CI and SVV driven algorithm did not result in improved outcomes after high-risk abdominal surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Registry: NTR3380.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric E C de Waal
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Michael Frank
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Thomas W L Scheeren
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Thomas Kaufmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Dianne de Korte-de Boer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Boris Cox
- Department of Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - L M Montenij
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Wolfgang Buhre
- Department of Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Liu Y, Chen G, Gao J, Chi M, Mao M, Shi Y, Ji Z, Fu Q, Zhang H, Xu Z. Effect of different levels of stroke volume variation on the endothelial glycocalyx of patients undergoing colorectal surgery: A randomized clinical trial. Exp Physiol 2021; 106:2124-2132. [PMID: 34347918 DOI: 10.1113/ep089348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
NEW FINDINGS What is the central question of this study? Massive infusion can destroy the endothelial glycocalyx. We compared the serum concentrations of endothelial glycocalyx components and atrial natriuretic peptide and the outcomes of patients with different levels of stroke volume variation (SVV). What is the main finding and its importance? With a decrease in SVV, the serum concentrations of endothelial glycocalyx components and atrial natriuretic peptide increased, whereas the oxygenation index decreased. When the intraoperative SVV was maintained at 7-10%, the patients had better postoperative recovery and shorter postoperative hospital stays. Therefore, it is advisable to maintain the SVV between 7 and 10%. ABSTRACT Dynamic haemodynamic parameters, such as stroke volume variation (SVV), can be used for blood volume monitoring. However, studies have determined the SVV threshold but not the optimal level. The endothelial glycocalyx (EG) plays an important role in maintaining vascular permeability. Moreover, rapid and massive infusion can lead to the degradation, shedding and destruction of the EG. We aimed to explore the effects of different SVV values (11-14, 7-10 or 3-6%) on the EG in 54 patients who were scheduled for elective colorectal tumour surgery and to identify the optimal peri-operative fluid therapy strategy. The concentrations of EG degradation products (heparin sulphate, hyaluronic acid and syndecan-1) and atrial natriuretic peptide were higher when the SVV was maintained between 3 and 6% after fluid therapy compared with pre-infusion (P < 0.05). Comparison of postoperative complications and hospitalization time among the three SVV levels was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The postoperative hospitalization time in patients with SVV of 7-10% was shorter than that in patients with SVV of 3-6%. Infusion of a large volume of fluid, with increasing EG degeneration and atrial natriuretic peptide concentrations, might be related to postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 69 Yongding Road, Beijing, 100039, China.,Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Jie Gao
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Menglin Chi
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Mengmeng Mao
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Yizheng Shi
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Zexuan Ji
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Qiang Fu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Hong Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Zhipeng Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Joosten A, Rinehart J, Van der Linden P, Alexander B, Penna C, De Montblanc J, Cannesson M, Vincent JL, Vicaut E, Duranteau J. Computer-assisted Individualized Hemodynamic Management Reduces Intraoperative Hypotension in Intermediate- and High-risk Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology 2021; 135:258-272. [PMID: 33951140 PMCID: PMC8277754 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individualized hemodynamic management during surgery relies on accurate titration of vasopressors and fluids. In this context, computer systems have been developed to assist anesthesia providers in delivering these interventions. This study tested the hypothesis that computer-assisted individualized hemodynamic management could reduce intraoperative hypotension in patients undergoing intermediate- to high-risk surgery. METHODS This single-center, parallel, two-arm, prospective randomized controlled single blinded superiority study included 38 patients undergoing abdominal or orthopedic surgery. All included patients had a radial arterial catheter inserted after anesthesia induction and connected to an uncalibrated pulse contour monitoring device. In the manually adjusted goal-directed therapy group (N = 19), the individualized hemodynamic management consisted of manual titration of norepinephrine infusion to maintain mean arterial pressure within 10% of the patient's baseline value, and mini-fluid challenges to maximize the stroke volume index. In the computer-assisted group (N = 19), the same approach was applied using a closed-loop system for norepinephrine adjustments and a decision-support system for the infusion of mini-fluid challenges (100 ml). The primary outcome was intraoperative hypotension defined as the percentage of intraoperative case time patients spent with a mean arterial pressure of less than 90% of the patient's baseline value, measured during the preoperative screening. Secondary outcome was the incidence of minor postoperative complications. RESULTS All patients were included in the analysis. Intraoperative hypotension was 1.2% [0.4 to 2.0%] (median [25th to 75th] percentiles) in the computer-assisted group compared to 21.5% [14.5 to 31.8%] in the manually adjusted goal-directed therapy group (difference, -21.1 [95% CI, -15.9 to -27.6%]; P < 0.001). The incidence of minor postoperative complications was not different between groups (42 vs. 58%; P = 0.330). Mean stroke volume index and cardiac index were both significantly higher in the computer-assisted group than in the manually adjusted goal-directed therapy group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In patients having intermediate- to high-risk surgery, computer-assisted individualized hemodynamic management significantly reduces intraoperative hypotension compared to a manually controlled goal-directed approach. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Joseph Rinehart
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care, University of California Irvine, California, USA
| | - Philippe Van der Linden
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brugmann Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Brenton Alexander
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, California, USA
| | - Christophe Penna
- Department of Gastro-intestinal Surgery, Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Jacques De Montblanc
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Maxime Cannesson
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jean-Louis Vincent
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eric Vicaut
- Unité de Recherche Clinique, Lariboisière, Paris 7 Diderot University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Jacques Duranteau
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Trauzeddel RF, Nordine M, Groesdonk HV, Michels G, Pfister R, Reuter DA, Scheeren TWL, Berger C, Treskatsch S. [Perioperative optimization using hemodynamically focused echocardiography in high-risk patients-A practice guide]. Anaesthesist 2021; 70:772-784. [PMID: 33660043 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-021-00934-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of high-risk patients undergoing surgery is steadily increasing. In order to maintain and, if necessary, optimize perioperative hemodynamics as well as the oxygen supply to the organs (DO2) in this patient population, a timely assessment of cardiac function and the underlying pathophysiological causes of hemodynamic instability is essential for the anesthesiologist. A variety of hemodynamic monitoring procedures are available for this purpose; however, due to method-immanent limitations they are often not able to directly identify the underlying cause of cardiovascular impairment. OBJECTIVE To present a stepwise algorithm for a perioperative echocardiography-based hemodynamic optimization in noncardiac surgery high-risk patients. In this context, echocardiography on demand according to international guidelines can be performed under certain conditions (hemodynamic instability, nonresponse to hemodynamic treatment) as well as in the context of a planned intraoperative procedure, mostly as a transesophageal echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS Hemodynamically focused echocardiography as a rapidly available bedside method, enables the timely diagnosis and assessment of cardiac filling obstructions, volume status and volume response, right and left heart function, and the function of the heart valves. CONCLUSION Integrating all echocardiographic findings in a differentiated assessment of the patient's cardiovascular function enables a (patho)physiologically oriented and individualized hemodynamic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R F Trauzeddel
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - M Nordine
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - H V Groesdonk
- Klinik für Interdisziplinäre Intensivmedizin und Intermediate Care, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Deutschland
| | - G Michels
- Klinik für Akut- und Notfallmedizin, St.-Antonius-Hospital gGmbH, Eschweiler, Deutschland
| | - R Pfister
- Klinik III für Innere Medizin, Herzzentrum, Uniklinik Köln, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - D A Reuter
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland
| | - T W L Scheeren
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Groningen, Groningen, Niederlande
| | - C Berger
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - S Treskatsch
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Ramsingh D, Hu H, Yan M, Lauer R, Rabkin D, Gatling J, Floridia R, Martinez M, Dorotta I, Razzouk A. Perioperative Individualized Goal Directed Therapy for Cardiac Surgery: A Historical-Prospective, Comparative Effectiveness Study. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10030400. [PMID: 33494308 PMCID: PMC7864512 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiac surgery patients are at increased risk for post-operative complications and prolonged length of stay. Perioperative goal directed therapy (GDT) has demonstrated utility for non-cardiac surgery, however, GDT is not common for cardiac surgery. We initiated a quality improvement (QI) project focusing on the implementation of a GDT protocol, which was applied from the immediate post-bypass period into the intensive care unit (ICU). Our hypothesis was that this novel GDT protocol would decrease ICU length of stay and possibly improve postoperative outcomes. Methods: This was a historical prospective, QI study for patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Integral to the QI project was education towards all associated providers on the concepts related to GDT. The protocol involved identifying patient specific targets for cardiac index and mean arterial pressure. These targets were maintained from the post-CPB period to the first 12 h in the ICU. Statistical comparisons were performed between the year after GDT therapy was launched to the last two years prior to protocol implementation. The primary outcome was ICU length of stay. Results: There was a significant decrease in ICU length of stay when comparing the year after the protocol initiation to years prior, from a median of 6.19 days to 4 days (2017 vs. 2019, p < 0.0001), and a median of 5.88 days to 4 days (2018 vs. 2019, p < 0.0001). Secondary outcomes demonstrated a significant reduction in total administered volumes of inotropic medication(milrinone). All other vasopressors demonstrated no differences across years. Hospital length of stay comparisons did not demonstrate a significant reduction. Conclusion: These results suggest that an individualized goal directed therapy for cardiac surgery patients can reduce ICU length of stay and decrease amount of inotropic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davinder Ramsingh
- Department of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA; (D.R.); (H.H.); (R.L.); (J.G.); (M.M.); (I.D.)
| | - Huayong Hu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA; (D.R.); (H.H.); (R.L.); (J.G.); (M.M.); (I.D.)
| | - Manshu Yan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA; (D.R.); (H.H.); (R.L.); (J.G.); (M.M.); (I.D.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-909-558-4475; Fax: +1-909-558-4143
| | - Ryan Lauer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA; (D.R.); (H.H.); (R.L.); (J.G.); (M.M.); (I.D.)
| | - David Rabkin
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA; (D.R.); (R.F.); (A.R.)
| | - Jason Gatling
- Department of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA; (D.R.); (H.H.); (R.L.); (J.G.); (M.M.); (I.D.)
| | - Rosario Floridia
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA; (D.R.); (R.F.); (A.R.)
| | - Mckinzey Martinez
- Department of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA; (D.R.); (H.H.); (R.L.); (J.G.); (M.M.); (I.D.)
| | - Ihab Dorotta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA; (D.R.); (H.H.); (R.L.); (J.G.); (M.M.); (I.D.)
| | - Anees Razzouk
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA; (D.R.); (R.F.); (A.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Joosten A, Van der Linden P, Vincent JL, Duranteau J. Goal-directed fluid therapy for oesophagectomy surgery. Br J Anaesth 2020; 126:e54-e55. [PMID: 33243476 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital De Bicêtre, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
| | - Philippe Van der Linden
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brugmann Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Louis Vincent
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jacques Duranteau
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital De Bicêtre, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|