Epidemiology and in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator agents against multidrug-resistant isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in Latin America as part of the ATLAS surveillance program in 2015‒2020

National Multicenter Study on the Prevalence of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in the Post-COVID-19 Era in Argentina: The RECAPT-AR Study

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the global antimicrobial resistance (AMR) crisis. Consequently, it is more urgent than ever to prioritize AMR containment and support countries in improving the detection, characterization, and rapid response to emerging AMR threats. We conducted a prospective, multicenter study to assess the prevalence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in infectious processes in Argentina during the post-COVID-19 pandemic period and explore therapeutic alternatives for their treatment (RECAPT-AR study).

METHODS

A total of 182 hospitals participated by submitting Enterobacterales clinical isolates to the National Reference Laboratory (NRL) during the first three weeks of November 2021. Inclusion criteria were defined as an ertapenem MIC ≥ 0.5 mg/L, a zone diameter ≤ 22 mm. Carbapenemase genes and those coding for major extended-spectrum β-lactamases were molecularly characterized using multiplex PCR at the NRL. Antibiotic susceptibility testing followed international standards (CLSI and EUCAST).

RESULTS

The NRL analyzed 821 Enterobacterales isolates. Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL, 42.0%) and KPC (39.8%) accounted for 81.8% of carbapenemases, followed by OXA-163 (7.4%), a variant of OXA-48 with additional activity against extended-spectrum cephalosporins, and enzyme combinations (8.3%). These combinations included NDM plus KPC (3.4%), OXA-163 plus KPC (2.4%), and OXA-163 plus NDM (2.1%). Klebsiella pneumoniae was the main species recovered, representing 76% of the isolates. According to the carbapenemase classes or combinations, tigecycline exhibited a susceptibility range of 33-83%, fosfomycin 59-81%, colistin 27-78%, and amikacin 17-81%. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and imipenem-relebactam (IMR) showed 92% and 98% susceptibility against serine carbapenemases, respectively. Meanwhile, aztreonam-avibactam (AZA) exhibited 96-98% susceptibility against all carbapenemase classes.

CONCLUSIONS

A new epidemiological landscape has emerged, characterized by the equivalent circulation of NDM and KPC. K. pneumoniae remains the primary species responsible for their dissemination. The co-production of carbapenemase combinations, particularly KPC plus NDM, was confirmed, mainly in K. pneumoniae. High activity was observed for AZA against MBLs and for CZA and IMR against KPC and OXA-163 carbapenemases.

Ceftazidime-avibactam combination therapy versus monotherapy for treating carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infection: a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam combination therapy with that of monotherapy in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB).

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted until September 1, 2023. Only studies that compared CZA combination therapy with monotherapy for CR-GNB infections were included.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies (23 retrospective observational studies and 2 prospective studies) involving 2676 patients were included. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the study group receiving combination therapy and the control group receiving monotherapy (risk ratio [RR] 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.18). In addition, no significant differences were observed between the study and the control group in terms of in-hospital mortality (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.79-1.27), 14-day mortality (RR 1.54; 95% CI 0.24-9.91), 90-day mortality (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.62-2.22), and clinical cure rate (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.84-1.08). However, the combination group had a borderline higher microbiological eradication rate than the control group (RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00-1.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to monotherapy, CZA combination therapy did not yield additional clinical benefits. However, combination therapy may be associated with favorable microbiological outcomes.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against gram-negative bacteria in patients with bacteremia and skin and soft-tissue infections in Colombia 2019-2021

OBJECTIVES

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is an option for infections caused by MDR gram-negative bacilli. In this study, we aimed to analyze the in vitro antimicrobial activity of CAZ-AVI and other antimicrobial agents against gram-negative bacilli that were collected in Colombia between 2019 and 2021 from patients with bacteremia and skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs).

METHODS

A total of 600 Enterobacterales and 259 P. aeruginosa strains were analyzed. The phenotypic resistance of isolates, particularly non-susceptibility to meropenem, multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates, and difficult-to-treat (DTR) P. aeruginosa, was evaluated according to CLSI breakpoints.

RESULTS

Enterobacterales had the most susceptibility to CAZ-AVI (96.5 %) and tigecycline (95 %). Tigecycline and CAZ-AVI were the antimicrobial agents with the most in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). CAZ-AVI was the antimicrobial treatment with the most activity against P. aeruginosa.

CONCLUSIONS

Tigecycline and CAZ-AVI were the antimicrobial agents with the most activity against CRE and MDR Enterobacterales. For P. aeruginosa, CAZ-AVI was the antimicrobial treatment with the most in vitro activity.

Biological activity of lyophilized chitosan scaffolds with inclusion of chitosan and zinc oxide nanoparticles

The constant demand for biocompatible and non-invasive materials for regenerative medicine in accidents and various diseases has driven the development of innovative biomaterials that promote biomedical applications. In this context, using sol-gel and ionotropic gelation methods, zinc oxide nanoparticles (NPs-ZnO) and chitosan nanoparticles (NPs-CS) were synthesized with sizes of 20.0 nm and 11.98 nm, respectively. These nanoparticles were incorporated into chitosan scaffolds through the freeze-drying method, generating a porous morphology with small (<100 μm), medium (100-200 μm), and large (200-450 μm) pore sizes. Moreover, the four formulations showed preliminary bioactivity after hydrolytic degradation, facilitating the formation of a hydroxyapatite (HA) layer on the scaffold surface, as evidenced by the presence of Ca (4%) and P (5.1%) during hydrolytic degradation. The scaffolds exhibited average antibacterial activity of F1 = 92.93%, F2 = 99.90%, F3 = 74.10%, and F4 = 88.72% against four bacterial strains: K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae, S. enterica, and S. aureus. In vivo, evaluation confirmed the biocompatibility of the functionalized scaffolds, where F2 showed accelerated resorption attributed to the NPs-ZnO. At the same time, F3 exhibited controlled degradation with NPs-CS acting as initiation points for degradation. On the other hand, F4 combined NPs-CS and NPs-ZnO, resulting in progressive degradation, reduced inflammation, and an organized extracellular matrix. All the results presented expand the boundaries in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine by highlighting the crucial role of nanoparticles in optimizing scaffold properties.

Multifactorial resistance mechanisms associated with resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Switzerland

Background

Increasing reports of multidrug resistance (MDR) in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa have led to a necessity for new antimicrobials. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is indicated for use against MDR P. aeruginosa across a broad range of infection types and particularly those that are carbapenem resistant. This study sought to determine the molecular mechanisms of CZA and imipenem (IPM)-resistance in clinical P. aeruginosa isolates obtained from Swiss hospitals.

Methods

Clinical P. aeruginosa isolates were obtained from inpatients in three hospitals in Switzerland. Susceptibility was determined by either antibiotic disc testing or broth microdilution according to EUCAST methodology. AmpC activity was determined using cloxacillin and efflux activity was determined using phenylalanine-arginine β-naphthylamide, in agar plates. Whole Genome Sequencing was performed on 18 clinical isolates. Sequence types (STs) and resistance genes were ascertained using the Centre for Genomic Epidemiology platform. Genes of interest were extracted from sequenced isolates and compared to reference strain P. aeruginosa PAO1.

Results

Sixteen different STs were identified amongst the 18 isolates in this study indicating a high degree of genomic diversity. No carbapenemases were detected but one isolate did harbor the ESBL bla PER-1. Eight isolates were CZA-resistant with MICs ranging from 16-64 mg/L, and the remaining ten isolates had either low/wildtype MICs (n=6; 1-2 mg/L) or elevated, but still susceptible, MICs (n=4; 4-8 mg/L). Ten isolates were IPM-resistant, seven of which had mutations resulting in truncations of OprD, and the remaining nine IPM-susceptible isolates had intact oprD genes. Within CZA-R isolates, and those with reduced susceptibility, mutations resulting in ampC derepression, OprD loss, mexAB overexpression and ESBL (bla PER-1) carriage were observed in various combinations and one harbored a truncation of the PBP4 dacB gene. Within the six isolates with wildtype-resistance levels, five had no mutations that would affect any antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes of interest when compared to PAO1.

Conclusion

This preliminary study highlights that CZA-resistance in P. aeruginosa is multifactorial and could be caused by the interplay between different resistance mechanisms including ESBL carriage, increased efflux, loss of permeability and derepression of its intrinsic ampC.