Replication of epidemiological associations of carpal tunnel syndrome in a UK population-based cohort of over 400,000 people

Genetic Correlations between Migraine and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Surgical deactivation of extracranial nerve trigger sites is now well established as an effective treatment for migraine headache. Parallels have been drawn to median nerve decompression for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), and 2 previous studies have demonstrated an association between migraine and CTS. The authors sought to (1) substantiate these findings in a considerably larger UK cohort, and (2) investigate potential genetic associations between the 2 disorders.

METHODS

Nested case-control studies were conducted in the UK Biobank cohort of 401,656 individuals. Odds ratios were calculated for the association between migraine and CTS in the overall cohort and sex-stratified subsets. Genetic correlation between migraine and CTS was interrogated by linkage disequilibrium score regression, leveraging data from published genomewide association studies. Regions of genetic overlap were identified by multitrait analysis of genomewide association studies and cross-phenotype association.

RESULTS

Migraine and CTS show a significant epidemiologic association within UK Biobank (OR, 1.14, 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.25; P = 0.0058), which is specific to women (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.28; P = 0.0057) and not men (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.40; P = 0.61). Genetic analysis demonstrated a significant positive genetic correlation between the 2 disorders ( rg = 0.13; P = 0.0039), and implicated the TRIM32 locus on chromosome 9 as a region of genetic overlap.

CONCLUSIONS

This study replicates past reports of an epidemiologic association between CTS and migraine, albeit in women only. This association is underpinned by a genetic correlation, with shared genetic susceptibility at the TRIM32 locus. The authors' data add credibility to the notion that an element of entrapment neuropathy underlies migraine pathophysiology.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Carpal tunnel syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nerve entrapment disorder worldwide. The epidemiology and risk factors, including family burden, for developing CTS are multi-factorial. Despite much research, its intricate pathophysiological mechanism(s) are not fully understood. An underlying subclinical neuropathy may indicate an increased susceptibility to developing CTS. Although surgery is often performed for CTS, clear international guidelines to indicate when to perform non-surgical or surgical treatment, based on stage and severity of CTS, remain to be elucidated. Neurophysiological examination, using electrophysiology or ultrasonography, performed in certain circumstances, should correlate with the history and findings in clinical examination of the person with CTS. History and clinical examination are particularly relevant globally owing to lack of other equipment. Various instruments are used to assess CTS and treatment outcomes as well as the effect of the disorder on quality of life. The surgical treatment options of CTS - open or endoscopic - offer an effective solution to mitigate functional impairments and pain. However, there are risks of post-operative persistent or recurrent symptoms, requiring meticulous diagnostic re-evaluation before any additional surgery. Health-care professionals should have increased awareness about CTS and all its implications. Future considerations of CTS include use of linked national registries to understand risk factors, explore possible screening methods, and evaluate diagnosis and treatment with a broader perspective beyond surgery, including psychological well-being.

Khachatryan L, Mohammadian-Hafshejani A. Investigating the association between diabetes and carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis approach

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, several studies have reported on the relationship between diabetes and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, due to their contradictory results, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate this subject.

METHODS

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published in ISI Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Embase databases. Heterogeneity in the studies included in the meta-analysis was evaluated using statistical tests such as the Chi-square test, I2, and forest plots. Publication bias was assessed using Begg's and Egger's tests.

RESULTS

This investigation analyzed data from 42 studies conducted between 1985 and 2022, with a total of 3,377,816 participants. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the odds ratio (OR) of CTS in participants with a history of diabetes compared to those without was 1.90 (95% CI: 1.64-2.21; P-value < 0.001). Given that publication bias was observed in this study (Begg's test P-value = 0.01), the modified OR was calculated with consideration of missed studies, which was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.45-1.94; P-value < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that diabetic patients have 90% higher odds of developing CTS compared to non-diabetic individuals, which is statistically significant.

Modifiable Risk Factors for Prevention in Dupuytren Disease: A UK Biobank Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Dupuytren disease is associated with significant comorbidity and mortality, and it has no existing prevention strategies. It is unclear which modifiable risk factors are most amenable for prevention. This study aimed to determine the strength of modifiable risk factors for Dupuytren disease, and to investigate associations with other diseases.

METHODS

Using UK Biobank data, this case-control study analyzed the association between phenotypic variables and Dupuytren disease through multivariable logistic regression. Exposures assessed were age, sex, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, Townsend deprivation index, smoking status, alcohol intake, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cancer, liver disease, respiratory disease, rheumatoid arthritis, epilepsy, psoriasis, and gout.

RESULTS

There were 4148 cases and 397,425 controls. Male sex (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 2.90 to 3.60; P = 1.07 × 10 -100 ), increasing age (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.08; P = 6.78 × 10 -167 ), material deprivation (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.02; P = 0.0305), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.58 to 1.96; P = 3.35 × 10 -24 ), smoking exposure, and alcohol intake were all associated with increased odds of Dupuytren disease. With increasing obesity class, there was approximately 25% decreased odds (OR, 0.774; 95% CI, 0.734 to 0.816; P = 4.71 × 10 -21 ). Diabetes with microvascular or end-organ complications was associated with more than 2.5 times increased odds of Dupuytren disease (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.92 to 3.44; P = 1.92 × 10 -10 ). Within this group, increasing hemoglobin A1c values by 10 mmol/mol, or 0.9%, increased the odds by 31% (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.51; P = 2.19 × 10 -4 ).

CONCLUSION

Diabetes and poor glycemic control are major risk factors for Dupuytren disease, which present an opportunity for prevention.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Current Insights into Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Clinical Strategies for Prevention and Treatment

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a condition that is caused by medial nerve compression, resulting in symptoms such as numbness, tightness, or weakness in the hand.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to find out the genetic modulation, mechanism, available treatment, and recommendation for carpal tunnel syndrome at its specific stage.

METHODS

Almost 200 papers were searched for this review article, and 145 articles were selected. The literature was collected from different sources like Google scholar, PubMed, a directory of open-access journals, and science.gov by using keywords, such as treatment, risk factors, recommendation, and clinical features of carpal tunnel syndrome.

RESULTS

The most efficient non-surgical treatment is methylprednisolone acetate, which reduces inflammation by acting on the glucocorticoid receptor in conjunction with immunofilling. It has also been used successfully as a second-line drug for the treatment of patients with mild or moderate conditions in order to provide relief. New non-pharmacological options include laser therapy in acupuncture, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS), and sham therapy. Modern treatments like TENS, laser therapy, splints, and injections of methylprednisolone acetate have been demonstrated to be helpful in sporadic situations. For patients with mild and moderate problems, more research should be conducted that includes the combination of these surgical and non-surgical treatments.

CONCLUSION

We propose a multifunctional panel construct and define standard data items for future research into carpal tunnel syndrome. A discussion on idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome, risk factors, combination of therapies, using guidelines-based recommendations and treatment should be initiated.

Epidemiology of neuropathic pain: an analysis of prevalence and associated factors in UK Biobank

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

An analysis of UK Biobank participants who completed a detailed pain questionnaire identified factors associated with neuropathic pain (NeuP) vs no chronic pain and non-NeuP and estimated the prevalence of NeuP.

Introduction:

Previous epidemiological studies of neuropathic pain have reported a range of prevalences and factors associated with the disorder.

Objectives:

This study aimed to verify these characteristics in a large UK cohort.

Methods:

A cross-sectional analysis was conducted of 148,828 UK Biobank participants who completed a detailed questionnaire on chronic pain. The Douleur Neuropathique en Quatre Questions (DN4) was used to distinguish between neuropathic pain (NeuP) and non-neuropathic pain (non-NeuP) in participants with pain of at least 3 months' duration. Participants were also identified with less than 3 months' pain or without pain (NoCP). Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with NeuP compared with non-NeuP and NoCP, respectively.

Results:

Chronic pain was present in 76,095 participants (51.1%). The overall prevalence of NeuP was 9.2%. Neuropathic pain was significantly associated with worse health-related quality of life, having a manual or personal service type occupation, and younger age compared with NoCP. As expected, NeuP was associated with diabetes and neuropathy, but also other pains (pelvic, postsurgical, and migraine) and musculoskeletal disorders (rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia). In addition, NeuP was associated with pain in the limbs and greater pain intensity and higher body mass index compared with non-NeuP. Female sex was associated with NeuP when compared with NoCP, whereas male sex was associated with NeuP when compared with non-NeuP.

Conclusion:

This is the largest epidemiological study of neuropathic pain to date. The results confirm that the disorder is common in a population of middle- to older-aged people with mixed aetiologies and is associated with a higher health impact than non-neuropathic pain.

Electrodiagnostic Testing and Nerve Ultrasound of the Carpal Tunnel in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

In diabetic patients, controversies still exist about the validity of electrodiagnostic and nerve ultrasound diagnosis for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). We analyzed 69 patients with type 2 diabetes. Nerve conduction studies and peripheral nerve ultrasound of the median nerve over the carpal tunnel were performed. CTS symptoms were assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Polyneuropathy was assessed using the Neuropathy Symptom Score and the Neuropathy Disability Score. Although 19 patients reported predominantly mild CTS symptoms, 37 patients met the electrophysiological diagnosis criteria for CTS, and six patients were classified as severe or extremely severe. The sonographic cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve at the wrist was larger than 12 mm² in 45 patients (65.2%), and the wrist-to-forearm-ratio was larger than 1.4 in 61 patients (88.4%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that neither the distal motor latency, the median nerve CSA, nor the wrist-to-forearm-ratio could distinguish between patients with and without CTS symptoms. Diagnosis of CTS in diabetic patients should primarily be based upon typical clinical symptoms and signs. Results of electrodiagnostic testing and nerve ultrasound have to be interpreted with caution and additional factors have to be considered especially polyneuropathy, but also body mass index and hyperglycemia.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Diabetes—A Comprehensive Review

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compression neuropathy in the general population and is frequently encountered among individuals with type 1 and 2 diabetes. The reason(s) why a peripheral nerve trunk in individuals with diabetes is more susceptible to nerve compression is still not completely clarified, but both biochemical and structural changes in the peripheral nerve are probably implicated. In particular, individuals with neuropathy, irrespective of aetiology, have a higher risk of peripheral nerve compression disorders, as reflected among individuals with diabetic neuropathy. Diagnosis of CTS in individuals with diabetes should be carefully evaluated; detailed case history, thorough clinical examination, and electrophysiological examination is recommended. Individuals with diabetes and CTS benefit from surgery to the same extent as otherwise healthy individuals with CTS. In the present review, we describe pathophysiological aspects of the nerve compression disorder CTS in relation to diabetes, current data contributing to the explanation of the increased risk for CTS in individuals with diabetes, as well as diagnostic methods, treatment options, and prognosis of CTS in diabetes.