Antiphospholipid antibodies--we are not quite there yet

A Comparative Analysis of Anticardiolipin, Anti-Β2-Glycoprotein-1, and Lupus Anticoagulants in Saudi Women with Recurrent Spontaneous Abortions

Association and pathogenesis of antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs) in patients with Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) as well as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) suffering from unexplained spontaneous abortions is controversial. Moreover, the majority of the published evidence is based on the patient histories rather than the study groups. The main objective of the present study is to do a comparative analysis of the high levels of antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs) including anticardiolipin (ACA), anti-β2-glycoprotein-1 (β2 GP1), and Lupus anticoagulants (LA) and their association with the gestational age of abortion and duration past abortion in Saudi women. In this study, 100 women living in Makkah city, located in the Western region of Saudi Arabia, with a mean age of 30.5 ± 12.60 years (mean ± standard deviation), having a previous history of recurrent spontaneous abortions were enrolled as case group and 100 healthy pregnant women previously having one or more successful pregnancies were selected as control group. Based on the gestational age of the patient’s miscarriages, our results revealed consistently and significantly high levels of ACA, β2 GP1, and LA, being greatest at more than 15 weeks when compared with 10 weeks and 11−15 weeks, respectively. Based on duration of past miscarriages, a slightly increased level was observed at ≤4 years after their first miscarriage. In addition, less or more equal levels of these antibodies were observed at 5−12 and more than 12 years in all the cases of miscarriages. We concluded an elevated pattern of APAs in these patients with an increase in the age of abortion. A comparison between the levels of ACA, β2 GP1, and LA further indicated a highly significant level of LA in all the cases of abortions (p < 0.0005).

Lupus anticoagulant test persistence over time and its associations with future thrombotic events

Data on lupus anticoagulant (LA) test stability in patients persistently positive for LA are limited and its implications on clinical outcomes are lacking. We investigated the rate and predictors of a negative LA test and whether experiencing a negative test affected a patient's risk of future thrombotic events or death in a prospective observational study of persistently LA positive patients. We followed 164 patients (84% women) for a median of 9.2 years and a total of 1,438 follow-up visits. During the observation period, 50 thrombotic events (23 arterial and 27 venous events) occurred and 24 patients died. Forty-six of the patients had at least one negative LA test during the observation period, corresponding to a 10-year cumulative incidence of a negative LA test of 28% (95%CI: 20-35). The majority of patients with available follow-up after a negative LA test (n=41) had at least one subsequent positive test for LA (n=28/41, 68%). Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at baseline was associated with a negative LA test during follow up. Using a multistate time-to-event model with multivariable adjustment, a negative LA test had no impact on a patient's prospective risk of thrombosis or mortality. We conclude that a negative LA test during observation cannot be used clinically to stratify a patient's risk for future events.

[The clinical manifestations and risk factors in primary antiphospholipid syndrome with thrombocytopenia]

目的

分析伴血小板减少原发性抗磷脂综合征（PAPS）的临床特征、与血小板减少相关的危险因素以及疾病复发风险。

方法

回顾性分析2009年至2019年间于北京协和医院住院治疗的PAPS患者，比较血小板减少（PLT<100×10⁹/L）和血小板正常患者的临床和实验室检查结果，分析血小板减少患者的临床特征和未来症状再发风险，并应用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析筛选血小板减少的危险因素。

结果

纳入127例PAPS患者，其中36例（28.3%）合并血小板减少，中位年龄38.0（28.5,51.5）岁，女性占63.9%（13/23），平均血小板计数为（58.9±27.0）×10⁹/L。与血小板正常组（91例）相比，血小板减少组血栓及病理性妊娠发生率差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），自身免疫性溶血性贫血（19.4%对3.3%）、网状青斑（16.7%对3.3%）、慢性肾脏病变（25%对8.8%）、抗磷脂（aPL）抗体三阳性（61.1%对37.4%）发生率均显著增加（P<0.05），补体C3、C4水平显著降低（C3 0.87 g/L对1.07 g/L，C4 0.12 g/L对0.18 g/L，P值均<0.05），中位改良APS总体评分（aGAPSS）显著升高（13分对9分，P＝0.037）。多因素Logistic回归分析显示，低补体血症（OR＝5.032，95%CI 3.118～22.095）是发生血小板减少的危险因素。

结论

PAPS患者血小板减少多为轻中度降低。低补体血症是血小板减少的危险因素。伴血小板减少的PAPS患者再发风险较高。

Utility of Lupus Anticoagulant Assays (APTT-LA, KCT, DPT and DRVVT) in Detection of Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) in High Risk Pregnancy Cases

Routine investigation for recurrent pregnancy loss includes measurement of antiphospholipid antibodies. The lupus anticoagulant has long been associated with increased risks for thrombosis and adverse obstetric outcomes. But there are some disadvantages with lupus anticoagulant (LAC) tests which includes varied sensitivity of different clot based assays. ISTH recommends only 2 assays (preferably DRVVT and APTT-LA) for the identification of lupus anticoagulant but there are some studies which don't support this contention. Our study analyzed 526 samples from high risk pregnancy cases for APLA by all four LAC tests from tertiary centre of northern India. Among all the cases studies 65 cases were positive for lupus anticoagulant 25 of this became negative after 12 weeks. Among the 40 repeated positive assays, dRVVT could able to diagnose 36 cases followed by APTT-LA which could able to diagnose 28 cases, while KCT could able to diagnose 23 cases and dPT could able to diagnose only 14 cases. There were 12 cases in whom all lupus assays were positive. Our study thus concluded that DRVVT was the most sensitive followed by APPT-LA, KCT, dPT. The combination of dRVVT with APTT-LA or KCT appeared to be superior to other combinations. No individual test per se is 100% sensitive for the diagnosis of APLA in high risk pregnancy cases. Further results confirmed that repeated LAC result is required even in a high-risk setting. Positive LAC assay in majority were not associated with exclusively recurrent pregnancy loss but were associated with sporadic stillbirth and thrombosis.

Complement in the Pathophysiology of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Complement is a system of enzymes and regulatory proteins of the innate immune system that plays a key role in the inflammatory response to pathogenic stimuli. The complement and coagulation pathways are closely linked, and expanding data indicate that complement may be activated in patients with aPL and function as a cofactor in the pathogenesis of aPL-associated clinical events. Complement activation by aPL generates C5a, which induces neutrophil tissue factor-dependent procoagulant activity. Beta-2-glycoprotein I, the primary antigen for pathogenic aPL, has complement regulatory effects in vitro. Moreover, aPL induce fetal loss in wild-type mice but not in mice deficient in specific complement components (C3, C5). Antiphospholipid antibodies also induce thrombosis in wild type mice and this effect is attenuated in C3 or C6 deficient mice, or in the presence of a C5 inhibitor. Increased levels of complement activation products have been demonstrated in sera of patients with aPL, though the association with clinical events remains unclear. Eculizumab, a terminal complement inhibitor, has successfully been used to treat catastrophic APS and prevent APS-related thrombotic microangiopathy in the setting of renal transplant. However, the mechanisms of complement activation in APS, its role in the pathogenesis of aPL related complications in humans, and the potential of complement inhibition as a therapeutic target in APS require further study.

Anticoagulating patients with high-risk acquired thrombophilias

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria are 3 acquired thrombophilias that carry a high risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism. Management of these conditions has largely included anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist after an initial period of a parenteral anticoagulant, for as long as the thrombotic risk is still present. The available evidence for the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is limited and primarily consists of case series and cohort studies, which are summarized in this chapter. Randomized trials evaluating DOACs in patients with APS are reviewed. Further research is needed prior to widely adopting DOACs for use in these high-risk acquired thrombophilias; however, there may be selected low-risk subgroups where DOAC use is possible after careful consideration and patient discussion.

Anticoagulating patients with high-risk acquired thrombophilias

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria are 3 acquired thrombophilias that carry a high risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism. Management of these conditions has largely included anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist after an initial period of a parenteral anticoagulant, for as long as the thrombotic risk is still present. The available evidence for the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is limited and primarily consists of case series and cohort studies, which are summarized in this chapter. Randomized trials evaluating DOACs in patients with APS are reviewed. Further research is needed prior to widely adopting DOACs for use in these high-risk acquired thrombophilias; however, there may be selected low-risk subgroups where DOAC use is possible after careful consideration and patient discussion.

The clinical value of assays detecting antibodies against domain I of β2-glycoprotein I in the antiphospholipid syndrome

As the clinical symptoms of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) frequently occur irrespective of the syndrome, diagnosis predominantly depends on the laboratory assays measuring the level or function of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) is increasingly accepted as the most important target of aPLs. Anti-β2GPI antibodies constitute a heterogeneous population, but current in vivo and in vitro evidence show that especially the first domain (DI) of β2GPI contains an important pathogenic epitope. This epitope containing Glycine40-Arginine43 (G40-R43) has proven to be cryptic and only exposed when β2GPI is in its open conformation. A previous study demonstrated a highly variable exposure of the cryptic epitope in commercial anti-β2GPI assays, with implications on correct patient classification. Unexpectedly, recent unpublished data revealed impaired exposure of the pathogenic epitope in the commercially available anti-DI chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA) assay detecting specific antibodies directed to DI. In this review we summarize the laboratory and clinical performance characteristics of the different anti-DI assays in published data and conclude with inconsistent results for both the correlation of anti-DI antibodies with clinical symptoms and the added value of anti-DI antibodies in the classification criteria of APS. Additionally, we hypothesize on possible explanations for the observed discrepancies. Finally, we highly advise manufacturers to use normal pooled plasma spiked with the monoclonal anti-DI antibodies to verify correct exposure of the cryptic epitope.

Identification of high thrombotic risk triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome patients is dependent on anti-cardiolipin and anti-β2glycoprotein I antibody detection assays

Essentials Triple-positivity is associated with a high risk for a first thrombotic event and recurrence. Identification of triple-positives is dependent on the solid phase assay used. In triple-positivity, IgM only adds value in thrombotic risk stratification together with IgG. Thrombotic risk in triple-positive patients with IgM only, depends on the platform.

ABSTRACT

Background The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity with the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Triple-positivity (i.e. positivity for lupus anticoagulant [LAC], anti-cardiolipin [aCL] and anti-β2glycoprotein I [aβ2GPI] antibodies) is associated with a high thrombotic risk. Objectives We investigated the variability in triple-positivity detection by measuring the same samples with four commercially available solid phase assays. In addition, the added clinical value of aPL in LAC-positive patients was investigated, as well as the association of IgM triple-positivity and thrombosis. Patients/Methods We included 851 patients from seven European medical centers. Anti-CL and aβ2GPI IgG/IgM antibodies were determined by four platforms: BioPlex® 2200, ImmunoCap® EliA, ACL AcuStar® and QUANTA Lite ELISA® . Results Triple-positivity detection by solid phase assays varied, ranging from 89 up to 118 in thrombotic APS patients (n = 258), of which 86 were detected independent of the platform. Lupus anticoagulant positivity resulted in an odds ratio (OR) for thrombosis of 3.4; triple-positivity (irrespective of the isotype) increased the OR from 4.3 up to 5.2, dependent on the platform. Triple-positivity solely for the IgM isotype did not increase the OR for thrombosis compared with LAC positivity. The highest OR for thrombosis was reached for positivity for IgG and IgM aβ2GPI and aCL (8.6 up to 28.9). Conclusions Triple-positivity proved to be highly associated with thrombosis, but identification is assay dependent. Within triple-positivity, IgM antibodies only have an added clinical value in patients positive for IgG antibodies.

How to Identify High-Risk APS Patients: Clinical Utility and Predictive Values of Validated Scores

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a clinical disorder characterised by thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in the persistence of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies that are pathogenic and have pro-coagulant activities. Thrombosis in APS tends to recur and require prophylaxis; however, the stereotypical treatment for APS patients is inadequate and stratification of the thrombotic risks is important as aPL are prevalently observed in various diseases or elderly population.

RECENT FINDINGS

It is previously known that the multiple positive aPL or high titre aPL correlate to thrombotic events. To progress the stratification of thrombotic risks in APS patients and to quantitatively analyse those risks, antiphospholipid score (aPL-S) and the Global Anti-phospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS) were defined. These scores were raised from the large patient cohort data and either aPL profile classified in detail (aPL-S) or simplified aPL profile with classical thrombotic risk factors (GAPSS) was put into a scoring system. Both the aPL-S and GAPSS have shown a degree of accuracy in identifying high-risk APS patients, especially those at a high risk of thrombosis. However, there are several areas requiring improvement, or at least that clinicians should be aware of, before these instruments are applied in clinical practice. One such issue is standardisation of the aPL tests, including general testing of phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT). Additionally, clinicians may need to be aware of the patient's medical history, particularly with respect to the incidence of SLE, which influences the cutoff value for identifying high-risk patients.

Clinical Risk Assessment in the Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Current Landscape and Emerging Biomarkers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Laboratory criteria for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome include the detection of a lupus anticoagulant and/or anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies. However, the majority of patients who test positive in these assays do not have thrombosis. Current risk-stratification tools are largely limited to the antiphospholipid antibody profile and traditional thrombotic risk factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Novel biomarkers that correlate with disease activity and potentially provide insight into future clinical events include domain 1 specific anti-β₂GPI antibodies, antibodies to other phospholipids or phospholipid/protein antigens (such as anti-PS/PT), and functional/biological assays such as thrombin generation, complement activation, levels of circulating microparticles, and annexin A5 resistance. Clinical risk scores may also have value in predicting clinical events. Biomarkers that predict thrombosis risk in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies have been long sought, and several biomarkers have been proposed. Ultimately, integration of biomarkers with established assays and clinical characteristics may offer the best chance of identifying patients at highest risk of APS-related complications.

Effects of anti-β2GPI antibodies on VWF release from human umbilical vein endothelial cells and ADAMTS13 activity

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by recurrent thromboembolic events in the setting of pathologic autoantibodies, some of which are directed to β2-Glycoprotein 1 (β2GPI). The mechanisms of thrombosis in APS appear to be multifactorial and likely include a component of endothelial activation. Among other things, activated endothelium secretes von Willebrand factor, a hemostatic protein that in excess can increase the risk of thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that anti-β2GPI antibodies could regulate the release and modulation of VWF from endothelial cells.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Isolated anti-β2GPI antibodies from patients with APS were assayed for their ability to induced VWF release from HUVECs and modulate the effects of ADAMTS13 in a shear-dependent assay.

RESULTS

We observed that anti-β2GPI antibodies from some patients with APS induced VWF release from human endothelial cells but did not induce formation of cell-anchored VWF-platelet strings. Finally, we also determined that one of the Anti-β2GPI antibodies tested can inhibit the function of ADAMTS13, the main modulator of extracellular VWF.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that VWF and ADAMTS13 may play a role in the prothrombotic phenotype of APS.

Diagnosis and management of the antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by thrombosis and/or pregnancy complications in the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA). Laboratory diagnosis of APLA depends upon the detection of a lupus anticoagulant, which prolongs phospholipid-dependent anticoagulation tests, and/or anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein-1 (β2GPI) antibodies. APLA are primarily directed toward phospholipid binding proteins. Pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying thrombosis and pregnancy loss in APS include APLA induced cellular activation, inhibition of natural anticoagulant and fibrinolytic systems, and complement activation, among others. There is a high rate of recurrent thrombosis in APS, especially in triple positive patients (patients with lupus anticoagulant, aCL and anti-β2GPI antibodies), and indefinite anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist is the standard of care for thrombotic APS. There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in thrombotic APS. Aspirin with low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin may reduce the incidence of pregnancy loss in obstetric APS. Recent insights into the pathogenesis of APS have led to the identification of new potential therapeutic interventions, including anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory therapies. Additional research is needed to better understand the effects of APLA on activation of signaling pathways in vascular cells, to identify more predictive biomarkers that define patients at greatest risk for a first or recurrent APLA-related clinical event, and to determine the safety and efficacy of DOACs and novel anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory therapies for refractory APS.

Increased mortality in patients with the lupus anticoagulant: the Vienna Lupus Anticoagulant and Thrombosis Study (LATS)

Data on the clinical course of lupus anticoagulant (LA)-positive individuals with or without thrombotic manifestations or pregnancy complications are limited. To investigate mortality rates and factors that might influence mortality, we conducted a prospective observational study of LA-positive individuals. In total, 151 patients (82% female) were followed for a median of 8.2 years; 30 of the patients (20%) developed 32 thromboembolic events (15 arterial and 17 venous events) and 20 patients (13%) died. In univariable analysis, new onset of thrombosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.46-22.16) was associated with adverse survival. Thrombosis remained a strong adverse prognostic factor after multivariable adjustment for age and hypertension (HR = 5.95; 95% CI, 2.43-14.95). Concomitant autoimmune diseases, anticoagulant treatment at baseline, or positivity for anticardiolipin- or anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies were not associated with mortality. In a relative survival analysis, our cohort of LA positives showed a persistently worse survival in comparison with an age-, sex-, and study-inclusion-year-matched Austrian reference population. The cumulative relative survival was 95.0% (95% CI, 88.5-98.8) after 5 years and 87.7% (95% CI, 76.3-95.6) after 10 years. We conclude that occurrence of a thrombotic event is associated with higher mortality in patients with LA. Consequently, the prevention of thromboembolic events in LA positives might improve survival.

The antiphospholipid syndrome: still an enigma

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined by clinical manifestations that include thrombosis and/or fetal loss or pregnancy morbidity in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Antiphospholipid antibodies are among the most common causes of acquired thrombophilia, but unlike most of the genetic thrombophilias are associated with both venous and arterial thrombosis. Despite an abundance of clinical and basic research on aPL, a unified mechanism that explains their prothrombotic activity has not been defined; this may reflect the heterogeneity of aPL and/or the fact that they may influence multiple pro- and/or antithrombotic pathways. Antiphospholipid antibodies are directed primarily toward phospholipid binding proteins rather than phospholipid per se, with the most common antigenic target being β2-glycoprotein 1 (β2GPI) although antibodies against other targets such as prothrombin are well described. Laboratory diagnosis of aPL depends upon the detection of a lupus anticoagulant (LA), which prolongs phospholipid-dependent anticoagulation tests, and/or anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies. Indefinite anticoagulation remains the mainstay of therapy for thrombotic APS, although new strategies that may improve outcomes are emerging. Preliminary reports suggest caution in the use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with APS-associated thrombosis. Based on somewhat limited evidence, aspirin and low molecular weight heparin are recommended for obstetrical APS. There remains a pressing need for better understanding of the pathogenesis of APS in humans, for identification of clinical and laboratory parameters that define patients at greatest risk for APS-related events, and for targeted treatment of this common yet enigmatic disorder.

Antiphospholipid antibody testing and standardization

The laboratory criteria that define patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) include lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI). All assays show methodological shortcomings and the combination of the three tests, each with different sensitivity and specificity, and hence, differences in clinical utility make the laboratory diagnosis of APS challenging. Consensus guidelines and proposals for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) testing have been published in the last 20 years and have led to a substantial improvement. Despite efforts so far, standardization is not reached yet, but progress has been made. On-going efforts to reduce the interlaboratory/interassay variations remain important; even an absolute standardization cannot be feasibly achieved. Taking into account the methodological shortcomings of the means we have available, more detailed guidelines may help in adequate performance of aPL testing. This review will focus on the efforts and achievements in standardization and on the weaknesses and strengths of the current available laboratory methods.

Refinement of the cutoff values of the HemosIL AcuStar assay for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies

BACKGROUND

The HemosIL AcuStar antiphospholipid assay (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA) is a fully automated assay using chemiluminescent technology for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies. This assay showed excellent agreement between results of different laboratories. The cutoff values to define positivity were calculated in 250 healthy blood bank donors but were associated with large confidence intervals (CIs).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to more precisely determine the cutoff values of the HemosIL AcuStar antiphospholipid assay by increasing the number of healthy blood bank donors through a multicenter study and by applying a normalization procedure of the distribution of each antibody.

METHODS

Five laboratories participated to this study, allowing the inclusion of 626 samples. We used a Box-Cox power transformation method to normalize the distribution and calculate the 99th percentile and the corresponding 95%CI for each antibody.

RESULTS

The revised cutoff values were overall lower than those initially calculated with more stringent CIs and yielded a 4.2% increase in sensitivity with a 2.7% decrease in specificity regarding thrombotic events or obstetric complications.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide refined cutoff values for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies with the HemosIL AcuStar Antiphospholipid assay that should be preferred for routine use.

Pulmonary hypertension in systemic lupus erythematosus: pulmonary thromboembolism is the leading cause

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a life-threatening complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Pulmonary hypertension in SLE has a variety of causes. Diagnosing early and defining the cause of PH accurately can provide better clinical outcome in SLE. We investigated the causes and characteristics of PH in patients with SLE.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-one patients with SLE who had a visit in a 6-month period were assessed retrospectively. Patients who ever had a systolic pulmonary arterial pressure of 40 mm Hg or greater by Doppler echocardiography were considered to have PH.

RESULTS

Among 122 patients, 65 had echocardiography for some reason, and 10 (8.2%) were diagnosed as having PH by echocardiographic examination. This number reduced to 9 (7.4%) when we excluded the patient with normal pulmonary artery pressure at right heart catheterization. Causes of PH were as follows: thromboembolic events in 4 patients (44.4%) (2 of them had chronic thromboembolic PH), left-sided heart disease in 2 patients (22.2%), pulmonary arterial hypertension in 1 patient (11.1%), high cardiac output state in 1 patient (11.1%), and transient elevation of systolic pulmonary artery pressure in 1 patient (11.1%) who had a history of venous thromboembolism. Venous thromboembolic disease was significantly higher in patients with SLE with PH in comparison to patients with SLE without PH (7 patients [6.3%] vs 5 patients [50.0%]; P = 0.001). All patients improved clinically during their short-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SLE are at increased risk for PH. This study highlights the complexity of the differential diagnosis of PH in patients with SLE once again and emphasizes the importance of pulmonary thromboembolism as a cause of PH. One should investigate patients with SLE with unexplained symptoms and/or signs related to PH for possible treatable causes.

Thromboembolism risk following recurrent miscarriage

Normal pregnancy is associated with extensive changes in hemostasis such that the procoagulant effect becomes dominant. The evolutionary advantage of this hypercoagulability may be to counteract the inherent instability associated with hemochorial placentation, which is unique to human beings. However, overall, there is a four- to 10-fold increased thrombotic risk throughout gestation and the postpartum period. Certain inherited or acquired thrombophilic factors may predispose to arterial and/or venous thrombosis and have a possible association with pregnancy complications, including recurrent miscarriage (RM), which affects up to 5% of couples with childbearing desire. A subgroup of women with RM has been demonstrated to be in a prothombotic state before and after pregnancy. The long-term health implications of this hypercoagulability may imply an increased risk of ischemic heart disease. Moreover, the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies rather than thrombophilic genetic defects (i.e., factor V Leiden or prothrombin G202010A mutation) in patients with RM is a determinant of thrombotic events later in life, especially among those patients having also cardiovascular risk factors. This article highlights the thromboembolic risk in nonpregnant RM patients in different thrombophilic settings and the need for thromboprophylaxis among these patients.

Variability in exposure of epitope G40-R43 of domain i in commercial anti-beta2-glycoprotein I IgG ELISAs

Background

A major problem for diagnosing the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the high variability between commercial anti-β₂glycoprotein I (β₂GPI) assays. Predominantly antibodies reactive against cryptic epitope Glycine40-Arginine43 (G40-R43) in domain I are associated with an increased risk for thrombosis. Upon interaction with anionic surfaces β₂GPI opens up, thereby exposing G40-R43.

Objectives

To examine whether suboptimal exposure of epitope G40-R43 explains the variations in results observed between commercial assays.

Methods

Two patient-derived monoclonal antibodies were tested on neutral versus anionic plates. Antibody P1-117 reacts with G40-R43 in the open conformation while P2-6 recognizes β₂GPI irrespective of its conformation. These antibodies were tested in commercial anti-β₂GPI assays (A–E).

Results

In assay A, both antibodies showed equal reactivity towards β₂GPI, indicating that all the β₂GPI exposes G40-R43. In other assays P1-117 displayed lower reactivity than P2-6, demonstrating reduced G40-R43 availability. To exclude influences of other assay features, reactivity was re-examined on plates of assay A and B using the protocol/reagents from each assay. In all combinations, reactivity of both antibodies on a plate was comparable to results obtained with its own protocol/reagents, suggesting that the coating, rather than other assay components, accounts for the observed differences. In two patient cohorts we demonstrated that a number of domain I-reactive samples are missed in assays characterized by a decreased exposure of epitope G40-R43.

Conclusions

Exposure of epitope G40-R43 on β₂GPI is highly variable between commercial anti-β₂GPI assays. As a consequence, patients can be falsely assigned negative in assays characterized by a reduced exposure of G40-R43.

The lupus anticoagulant: results from 2257 patients attending a high-risk pregnancy clinic

Only 62 (2.7%) of 2257 high-risk patients tested positive for LAC over 6 years; only 5 (0.02%) with early recurrent miscarriage tested positive. The 2 assays recommended by ISTH guidelines were less effective than our 4-assay panel at capturing and describing LAC-positive patients.

Antiphospholipid antibodies: evaluation of the thrombotic risk

The laboratory diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) via antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) tests, including lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anti-cardiolipin (aCL), or anti-beta2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) antibodies remains a challenge. Coagulation tests for LAC as well as solid phase assays for aCL and aβ2GPI have methodological shortcomings, although for LAC large progress have been made in standardization. All assays are associated with clinical APS-criteria (thrombotic and/or pregnancy complications) but with limited specificity. Besides, clinical studies demonstrating the association between the presence of aPL and thrombosis are not always well designed and result in wide ranges of odds ratio with large variation between studies. The best association between thrombotic complications and aPL is found for LAC. The association between thrombosis and aCL or aβ2GPI is at least inconsistent. The inclusion of more specific assays, such as the domain-I-β2GPI.antibodies is too premature and depends on further investigation in large clinical studies and the commercial availability. The search for new assays should proceed to identify patients with aPL with increased risk for thrombosis, preferable in large prospective studies. Meanwhile, with the current available LAC, aCL and aβ2GPI assays it is strongly recommended to make antibody profiles. Multiple positivity of tests seems clinically more relevant. The strengths and weaknesses of the current laboratory criteria for APS are discussed in view of their role in risk stratification of patients with thrombotic events.

Anti-cardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies: normal reference ranges in northwestern Italy

Laboratory tests for anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-β2glycoprotein I antibodies (a-β2GPI) face problems common to many autoantibody assays: the lack of a reference standard and the need for each laboratory to assess assay-specific cut-off values. The aims of the study were to evaluate the reference range upper limits (99th percentile) used for aCL and a-β2GPI in the northwest of Italy and to investigate the analytical performances of these assays with the newly obtained reference ranges. We assayed aCL and a-β2GPI in 104 serum samples from patients without a history of thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity, tumours, infections and/or autoimmune diseases (30 males and 74 non-pregnant females). We tested all the commercial assays available in our regions (i.e. Orgentec Diagnostika, Aesku Diagnostics and Inova Diagnostics ELISA; CliA Zenit-RA and EliA Phadia Laboratory Systems). A further 30 serum samples, including 10 from healthy subjects, 10 from antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients and 10 from septic patients were assessed to investigate the analytical performance of the obtained cut-off limits. Reference range upper limits obtained with the commercial kits differ among assays and from the values reported by the manufacturer. Moreover, normal reference ranges calculated for IgG and IgM aCL differed from the arbitrary selected laboratory classification values suggested in the guidelines of 40 GPL and MPL.

Standardization of antiphospholipid antibody assays. Where do we stand?

The laboratory criteria (lupus anticoagulants (LA), and/or anti-cardiolipin (aCL) antibodies and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI)) that define patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) were set in the Sapporo and Sydney criteria published in 1999 and 2006, respectively, and led to a substantial improvement in the recognition of APS. In addition, guidelines for LA detection were published by the Scientific Standardisation Subcommittee (SSC) of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) in 2009. However, a number of questions on this respect remain unresolved. Recommendations for the aCL and aβ2GPI assays intended to ameliorate the performance of these solid-phase assays. Despite efforts over the years, standardization has not been reached. This review will focus on methodological issues of the three antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) subtypes that are the subject of debate. The use of an international standard for aPL detection might help solve many of the problems caused by a lack of standardization of these assays.

The significance of autoantibodies against β2-glycoprotein I

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined by the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with a history of thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity, including fetal loss. APS is an autoimmune disease with a confusing name because the pathologic auto-antibodies are shown to be directed against the plasma protein β(2)-glycoprotein I and not against phospholipids. In fact, auto-antibodies that recognize phospholipids themselves are not associated with thrombosis but with infectious diseases. One of the intriguing questions is why autoantibodies against β(2)-glycoprotein I are so commonly found in both patients and the healthy. Several potential mechanisms have been suggested to explain the increased thrombotic risk in patients with these autoantibodies. In this overview, we will summarize our knowledge on the etiology of the autoantibodies, and we will discuss the evidence that identify autoantibodies against β(2)-glycoprotein I as the culprit of APS.

[Advances in the prevention, diagnosis and therapy of vascular diseases]

Atherosclerosis is a systemic disease affecting the coronary, carotid, intracerebral, renal and peripherial arteries. The early morphological and functional impairments could be detected in the second or third decades of life and their progression depend on the number and severity of risk factors and individual susceptility. Although the vascular risk factors (smoking, overweight, age, unhealthy diet, lack of physical exercise, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease and dyslipidemia) are the same and common in the different vascular diseases, the present clinical routine artificially classifies the diagnosis and therapy of different vascular diseases into different subfields of medicine with the negative impact of possible polypragmasia. Recently, worldwide health surveys (e.g. REACH registry) have proven the usefulness of a holistic approach in the diagnosis and therapy of multiorgan-affected vascular patients. This review summarizes the multidisciplinary advances and future perspective of vascular diseases.