1
|
Ashique S, Faruk A, Ahmad FJ, Khan T, Mishra N. It Is All about Probiotics to Control Cervical Cancer. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2024; 16:979-992. [PMID: 37880560 DOI: 10.1007/s12602-023-10183-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common malignancy in female patients. "Human papillomavirus" (HPV) contamination is a leading cause of all forms of cervical cancer, accounting for an expected 570,000 reported incidents in 2018. Two HPV strains (16 and 18) are responsible for 70% of CC and pre-cancerous cervical abnormalities. CC is one of the foremost reasons for the malignancy death rate in India among women ranging from 30 to 69 years of age in India, responsible for 17% of all cancer deaths. Currently approved cervical cancer treatments are associated with adverse reactions that might harm the lives of women affected by this disease. Consequently, probiotics can play a vital role in the treatment of CC. It is reflected from various studies regarding the role of probiotics in the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of cancer. In this review article, we have discussed the rationale of probiotics for treatment of CC, the role of probiotics as effective adjuvants in anti-cancer therapy and the combined effect of the anti-cancer drug along with probiotics to minimize the side effects due to chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumel Ashique
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Pandaveswar, West Bengal, 713346, India
| | - Abdul Faruk
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, Srinagar, Uttarakhand, India.
| | - Farhan Jalees Ahmad
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (SPER), Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, 110062, India
| | - Tasneem Khan
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (SPER), Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, 110062, India
| | - Neeraj Mishra
- Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Gwalior, 474005, Madhya Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bierbaum M, Rapport F, Arnolda G, Tran Y, Nic Giolla Easpaig B, Ludlow K, Clay-Williams R, Austin E, Laginha B, Lo CY, Churruca K, van Baar L, Hutchinson K, Chittajallu R, Owais SS, Nullwala R, Hibbert P, Fajardo Pulido D, Braithwaite J. Rates of adherence to cancer treatment guidelines in Australia and the factors associated with adherence: A systematic review. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2023; 19:618-644. [PMID: 36881529 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
Adherence to cancer treatment clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) varies enormously across Australia, despite being associated with improved patient outcomes. This systematic review aims to characterize adherence rates to active-cancer treatment CPGs in Australia and related factors to inform future implementation strategies. Five databases were systematically searched, abstracts were screened for eligibility, a full-text review and critical appraisal of eligible studies performed, and data extracted. A narrative synthesis of factors associated with adherence was conducted, and the median adherence rates within cancer streams calculated. A total of 21,031 abstracts were identified. After duplicates were removed, abstracts screened, and full texts reviewed, 20 studies focused on adherence to active-cancer treatment CPGs were included. Overall adherence rates ranged from 29% to 100%. Receipt of guideline recommended treatments was higher for patients who were younger (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], colorectal, lung, and breast cancer); female (breast and lung cancer), and male (DLBCL and colorectal cancer); never smokers (DLBCL and lung cancer); non-Indigenous Australians (cervical and lung cancer); with less advanced stage disease (colorectal, lung, and cervical cancer), without comorbidities (DLBCL, colorectal, and lung cancer); with good-excellent Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (lung cancer); living in moderately accessible places (colon cancer); and; treated in metropolitan facilities (DLBLC, breast and colon cancer). This review characterized active-cancer treatment CPG adherence rates and associated factors in Australia. Future targeted CPG implementation strategies should account for these factors, to redress unwarranted variation particularly in vulnerable populations, and improve patient outcomes (Prospero number: CRD42020222962).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Bierbaum
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Frances Rapport
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, AIHI, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Yvonne Tran
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, AIHI, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brona Nic Giolla Easpaig
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, AIHI, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kristiana Ludlow
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robyn Clay-Williams
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Austin
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bela Laginha
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chi Yhun Lo
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate Churruca
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lieke van Baar
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Hutchinson
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Renuka Chittajallu
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- Riverina Cancer Care Centre, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia
- GenesisCare, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Syeda Somyyah Owais
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ruqaiya Nullwala
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- North Eastern Public Health Unit, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Hibbert
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| | - Diana Fajardo Pulido
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, AIHI, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bierbaum M, Arnolda G, Braithwaite J, Rapport F. Clinician attitudes towards cancer treatment guidelines in Australia. BMC Res Notes 2023; 16:80. [PMID: 37194072 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06356-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are designed to guide treatment decisions, yet adherence rates vary widely. To characterise perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment CPG adherence in Australia, and estimate the frequency of previous qualitative research findings, a survey was distributed to Australian oncologists. RESULTS The sample is described and validated guideline attitude scores reported for different groups. Differences in mean CPG attitude scores across clinician subgroups and associations between frequency of CPG use and clinician characteristics were calculated; with 48 respondents there was limited statistical power to find differences. Younger oncologists (< 50 years) and clinicians participating in three or more Multidisciplinary Team Meetings were more likely to routinely or occasionally use CPGs. Perceived barriers and facilitators were identified. Thematic analysis was conducted on open-text responses. Results were integrated with previous interview findings and presented in a thematic, conceptual matrix. Most barriers and facilitators identified earlier were corroborated by survey results, with minor discordance. Identified barriers and facilitators require further exploration within a larger sample to assess their perceived impact on cancer treatment CPG adherence in Australia, as well as to inform future CPG implementation strategies. This research was Human Research Ethics Committee approved (2019/ETH11722 and 52019568810127, ID:5688).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Bierbaum
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2113, Australia.
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2113, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2113, Australia
| | - Frances Rapport
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2113, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bierbaum M, Rapport F, Arnolda G, Delaney GP, Liauw W, Olver I, Braithwaite J. Clinical practice guideline adherence in oncology: A qualitative study of insights from clinicians in Australia. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0279116. [PMID: 36525435 PMCID: PMC9757567 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden of cancer is large in Australia, and rates of cancer Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) adherence is suboptimal across various cancers. METHODS The objective of this study is to characterise clinician-perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer CPG adherence in Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect data from 33 oncology-focused clinicians (surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists and haematologists). Clinicians were recruited in 2019 and 2020 through purposive and snowball sampling from 7 hospitals across Sydney, Australia, and interviewed either face-to-face in hospitals or by phone. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim, and qualitative thematic analysis of the interview data was undertaken. Human research ethics committee approval and governance approval was granted (2019/ETH11722, #52019568810127). RESULTS Five broad themes and subthemes of key barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment CPG adherence were identified: Theme 1: CPG content; Theme 2: Individual clinician and patient factors; Theme 3: Access to, awareness of and availability of CPGs; Theme 4: Organisational and cultural factors; and Theme 5: Development and implementation factors. The most frequently reported barriers to adherence were CPGs not catering for patient complexities, being slow to be updated, patient treatment preferences, geographical challenges for patients who travel large distances to access cancer services and limited funding of CPG recommended drugs. The most frequently reported facilitators to adherence were easy accessibility, peer review, multidisciplinary engagement or MDT attendance, and transparent CPG development by trusted, multidisciplinary experts. CPGs provide a reassuring framework for clinicians to check their treatment plans against. Clinicians want cancer CPGs to be frequently updated utilising a wiki-like process, and easily accessible online via a comprehensive database, coordinated by a well-trusted development body. CONCLUSION Future implementation strategies of cancer CPGs in Australia should be tailored to consider these context-specific barriers and facilitators, taking into account both the content of CPGs and the communication of that content. The establishment of a centralised, comprehensive, online database, with living wiki-style cancer CPGs, coordinated by a well-funded development body, along with incorporation of recommendations into point-of-care decision support would potentially address many of the issues identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Bierbaum
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Frances Rapport
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Geoff P. Delaney
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Sydney, Australia
- SWSLHD Cancer Services, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Winston Liauw
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Sydney, Australia
- SESLHD Cancer Service, Kogarah, Australia
| | - Ian Olver
- School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yoon J, Kim H, Jeong YIL, Yang HS. CD44 Receptor-Mediated/Reactive Oxygen Species-Sensitive Delivery of Nanophotosensitizers against Cervical Cancer Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23073594. [PMID: 35408970 PMCID: PMC8998256 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23073594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Stimulus-sensitive, nanomedicine-based photosensitizer delivery has an opportunity to target tumor tissues since oxidative stress and the expression of molecular proteins, such as CD44 receptors, are elevated in the tumor microenvironment. The aim of this study is to investigate the CD44 receptor- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-sensitive delivery of nanophotosensitizers of chlorin e6 (Ce6)-conjugated hyaluronic acid (HA) against HeLa human cervical cancer cells. For the synthesis of nanophotosensitizers, thioketal diamine was conjugated with the carboxyl group in HA and then the amine end group of HA-thioketal amine conjugates was conjugated again with Ce6 (Abbreviated as HAthCe6). The HAthCe6 nanophotosensitizers were of small diameter, with sizes less than 200. Their morphology was round-shaped in the observations using a transmission electron microscope (TEM). The HAthCe6 nanophotosensitizers responded to oxidative stress-induced changes in size distribution when H2O2 was added to the nanophotosensitizer aqueous solution, i.e., their monomodal distribution pattern at 0 mM H2O2 was changed to dual- and/or multi-modal distribution patterns at higher concentrations of H2O2. Furthermore, the oxidative stress induced by the H2O2 addition contributed to the disintegration of HAthCe6 nanophotosensitizers in morphology, and this phenomenon accelerated the release rate of Ce6 from nanophotosensitizers. In a cell culture study using HeLa cells, nanophotosensitizers increased Ce6 uptake ratio, ROS generation and PDT efficacy compared to free Ce6. Since HA specifically bonds with the CD44 receptor of cancer cells, the pretreatment of free HA against HeLa cells decreased the Ce6 uptake ratio, ROS generation and PDT efficacy of HAthCe6 nanophotosensitizers. These results indicated that intracellular delivery of HAthCe6 nanophotosensitizers can be controlled by the CD44 receptor-mediated pathway. Furthermore, these phenomena induced CD44 receptor-controllable ROS generation and PDT efficacy by HAthCe6 nanophotosensitizers. During in vivo tumor imaging using HeLa cells, nanophotosensitizer administration showed that the fluorescence intensity of tumor tissues was relatively higher than that of other organs. When free HA was pretreated, the fluorescence intensity of tumor tissue was relatively lower than those of other organs, indicating that HAthCe6 nanophotosensitizers have CD44 receptor sensitivity and that they can be delivered by receptor-specific manner. We suggest that HAthCe6 nanophotosensitizers are promising candidates for PDT in cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jieun Yoon
- Department of Medicine, Graduate School, Dongguk University, Gyeongju 38067, Korea; (J.Y.); (H.K.)
| | - Howard Kim
- Department of Medicine, Graduate School, Dongguk University, Gyeongju 38067, Korea; (J.Y.); (H.K.)
| | - Young-IL Jeong
- Research Institute of Convergence of Biomedical Sciences, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Gyeongnam 50612, Korea
- The Institute of Dental Science, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Korea
- Correspondence: (Y.-I.J.); (H.S.Y.)
| | - Hoe Saeng Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju 38067, Korea
- Correspondence: (Y.-I.J.); (H.S.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sugumaran A, Mathialagan V. Colloidal Nanocarriers as Versatile Targeted Delivery Systems for Cervical Cancer. Curr Pharm Des 2021; 26:5174-5187. [PMID: 32586249 DOI: 10.2174/1381612826666200625110950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The second most common malignant cancer of the uterus is cervical cancer, which is present worldwide, has a rising death rate and is predominant in developing countries. Different classes of anticancer agents are used to treat cervical carcinoma. The use of these agents results in severe untoward side-effects, toxicity, and multidrug resistance (MDR) with higher chances of recurrence and spread beyond the pelvic region. Moreover, the resulting clinical outcome remains very poor even after surgical procedures and treatment with conventional chemotherapy. Because of the nonspecificity of their use, the agents wipe out both cancerous and normal tissues. Colloidal nano dispersions have now been focusing on site-specific delivery for cervical cancer, and there has been much advancement. METHODS This review aims to highlight the problems in the current treatment of cervical cancer and explore the potential of colloidal nanocarriers for selective delivery of anticancer drugs using available literature. RESULTS In this study, we surveyed the role and potential of different colloidal nanocarriers in cervical cancer, such as nanoemulsion, nanodispersions, polymeric nanoparticles, and metallic nanoparticles and photothermal and photodynamic therapy. We found significant advancement in colloidal nanocarrier-based cervical cancer treatment. CONCLUSION Cervical cancer-targeted treatment with colloidal nanocarriers would hopefully result in minimal toxic side effects, reduced dosage frequency, and lower MDR incidence and enhance the patient survival rates. The future direction of the study should be focused more on the regulatory barrier of nanocarriers based on clinical outcomes for cervical cancer targeting with cost-effective analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abimanyu Sugumaran
- Department of Pharmaceutics, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur 603203, India
| | - Vishali Mathialagan
- Department of Pharmaceutics, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur 603203, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sarkar S, Tribedi P, Bhadra K. Structure-activity insights of harmine targeting DNA, ROS inducing cytotoxicity with PARP mediated apoptosis against cervical cancer, anti-biofilm formation and in vivo therapeutic study. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2021; 40:5880-5902. [PMID: 33480316 DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2021.1874533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Harmine exhibits pH dependent structural equilibrium and possesses numerous biological and pharmacological activities. Mode and mechanism of DNA binding and its cytotoxicity were studied by multiple spectroscopic, calorimetric, molecular docking and in vitro apoptotic as well as in vivo biochemical and histological studies. It exists as cationic (structure I) and decationic form (structure II) in the pH range 3.0-7.8 and 8.5-12.4, respectively, with a pKa of 8.0. Structure I at pH 6.8 binds strongly to DNA with a cooperative mode of binding of Kiω 1.03 × 106 M-1and stoichiometry of 5.0 nucleotide phosphates. Structure I stabilized DNA by 10 °C, showed85%quenching of fluorescence intensity, perturbation in circular dichroism, partial intercalation and enthalpy driven exothermic binding. While, structure II at pH 8.5 has very weak interaction with CT DNA. Cytotoxic potencies of structure I was tested on four different cancer cell lines along with normal embryonic cell. It showed maximum cytotoxicity with GI50of 20 µM, against HeLa causing several apoptotic induction abilities. Harmine exhibited G2M arrest with ROS induced effective role in PARP mediated apoptosis as well as anti-inflammatory action on HeLa cells. Harmine further presented MIC and antibiofilm activity against Staphylococcus aureus in presence of <160 and 30 µg/ml, respectively. Mice with post harmine treatment (30 mg/kg b.w., I.P.) showed maximum recovery from damaged to near normal architecture of cervical epithelial cells. This study may be of prospective use in a framework to design novel beta carboline compounds for improved therapeutic applications in future against cervical cancer. HighlightsHarmine exists in structure I and structure II forms in the pH 6.8 and 8.5with a pKa of 8.0.Structure I at pH 6.8 binds strongly to DNA compared to structure II.Structure I showed maximum cytotoxicity with GI50 of 20 µM against HeLa.ROS mediated cytotoxicitywithG2M arrest with PARP mediated apoptosis was studied.Harmine (30µg/ml) exhibited antibiofilm activity against Staphylococcus aureus.Post harmine dose (30 mg/kg b.w., I.P.) in mice showed recovery of cervical epithelial cells.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarita Sarkar
- Department of Zoology, University of Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India
| | - Prosun Tribedi
- Department of Biotechnology, The Neotia University, Sarisha, West Bengal, India
| | - Kakali Bhadra
- Department of Zoology, University of Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Perera SK, Jacob S, Sullivan R, Barton M. Evidence-based benchmarks for use of cancer surgery in high-income countries: a population-based analysis. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:173-181. [PMID: 33485459 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30589-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Estimating a population-level benchmark rate for use of surgery in the management of cancer helps to identify treatment gaps, estimate the survival impact of such gaps, and benchmark the workforce and other resources, including budgets, required to meet service needs. A population-based benchmark for use of surgery in high-income settings to inform policy makers and service provision has not been developed but was recommended by the Lancet Oncology Commission on Global Cancer Surgery. We aimed to develop and validate a cancer surgery benchmarking model. METHODS We examined the latest clinical guidelines from high-income countries (Australia, the UK, the EU, the USA, and Canada) and mapped surgical treatment pathways for 30 malignant cancer sites (19 individual sites and 11 grouped as other cancers) that were notifiable in Australia in 2014, broadly reflecting contemporary high-income models of care. The optimal use of surgery was considered as an indication for surgery where surgery is the treatment of choice for a given clinical scenario. Population-based epidemiological data, such as cancer stage, tumour characteristics, and fitness for surgery, were derived from Australia and other similar high-income settings for 2017. The probabilities across the clinical pathways of each cancer were multiplied and added together to estimate the population-level benchmark rates of cancer surgery, and further validated with the comparisons of observed rates of cancer surgery in the South Western Sydney Local Health District in 2006-12. Univariable and multivariable sensitivity analyses were done to explore uncertainty around model inputs, with mean (95% CI) benchmark surgery rates estimated on the basis of 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations. FINDINGS Surgical treatment was indicated in 58% (95% CI 57-59) of newly diagnosed patients with cancer in Australia in 2014 at least once during the course of their treatment, but varied by site from 23% (17-27) for prostate cancer to 99% (96-99) for testicular cancer. Observed cancer surgery rates in South Western Sydney were comparable to the benchmarks for most cancers, but were higher for some cancers, such as prostate (absolute increase of 29%) and lower for others, such as lung (-14%). INTERPRETATION The model provides a new template for high-income and emerging economies to rationally plan and assess their cancer surgery provision. There are differences in modelled versus observed surgery rates for some cancers, requiring more in-depth analysis of the observed differences. FUNDING University of New South Wales Scientia Scholarship, UK Research and Innovation-Global Challenges Research Fund.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sathira Kasun Perera
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, South West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Susannah Jacob
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, South West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, School of Cancer Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Barton
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, South West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Slotta C, Schlüter T, Ruiz-Perera LM, Kadhim HM, Tertel T, Henkel E, Hübner W, Greiner JFW, Huser T, Kaltschmidt B, Kaltschmidt C. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of c-REL in HeLa cells results in profound defects of the cell cycle. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0182373. [PMID: 28767691 PMCID: PMC5540532 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the fourth common cancer in women resulting worldwide in 266,000 deaths per year. Belonging to the carcinomas, new insights into cervical cancer biology may also have great implications for finding new treatment strategies for other kinds of epithelial cancers. Although the transcription factor NF-κB is known as a key player in tumor formation, the relevance of its particular subunits is still underestimated. Here, we applied CRISPR/Cas9n-mediated genome editing to successfully knockout the NF-κB subunit c-REL in HeLa Kyoto cells as a model system for cervical cancers. We successfully generated a homozygous deletion in the c-REL gene, which we validated using sequencing, qPCR, immunocytochemistry, western blot analysis, EMSA and analysis of off-target effects. On the functional level, we observed the deletion of c-REL to result in a significantly decreased cell proliferation in comparison to wildtype (wt) without affecting apoptosis. The impaired proliferative behavior of c-REL-/- cells was accompanied by a strongly decreased amount of the H2B protein as well as a significant delay in the prometaphase of mitosis compared to c-REL+/+ HeLa Kyoto cells. c-REL-/- cells further showed significantly decreased expression levels of c-REL target genes in comparison to wt. In accordance to our proliferation data, we observed the c-REL knockout to result in a significantly increased resistance against the chemotherapeutic agents 5-Fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (5-FUDR) and cisplatin. In summary, our findings emphasize the importance of c-REL signaling in a cellular model of cervical cancer with direct clinical implications for the development of new treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Slotta
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Thomas Schlüter
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | | | - Tobias Tertel
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Elena Henkel
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hübner
- Biomolecular Photonics, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Huser
- Biomolecular Photonics, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Barbara Kaltschmidt
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
- AG Molecular Neurobiology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tran PL, Morice P, Chirpaz E, Lazaro G, Boukerrou M. Impact of management on mortality in patients with invasive cervical cancer in Reunion Island. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
11
|
Chiew KL, Chong S, Duggan KJ, Kaadan N, Vinod SK. Assessing guideline adherence and patient outcomes in cervical cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2016; 13:e373-e380. [PMID: 27726297 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2016] [Accepted: 08/18/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
AIM To investigate adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in cervical cancer and the correlation with clinical outcomes. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using patient information from a population-based cancer registry (2005-2011, n = 208). Compliance to 10 widely accepted CPGs was assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess sociodemographic factors associated with CPG adherence. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to assess the relationship between CPG adherence and 5-year survival. RESULTS Adherence to individual CPGs ranged from 47% to 100%. Compliance to all applicable CPGs was seen in 54% (n = 72) of patients, 62% of stage I and II patients and 22% of stage III and IV patients. Poorest adherence was seen with those with locally advanced disease receiving chemoradiotherapy. Patients who lived within 5 km of the treatment facility were more likely to be compliant. No difference was found for either age, country of birth or socioeconomic status group. Five-year survival was greater for stage I and II patients who received guideline adherent care (93.7% vs 69.7%, P = 0.002), and they had a significant lower risk of death on multivariate analysis (HR = 0.22, P = 0.015). There was no significant difference for those with stage III or IV disease. CONCLUSIONS In this study, CPG adherence is variable between treatment modalities and only half complied to all applicable CPGs. There was better adherence in those with early-stage disease and this was associated with improved patient outcomes. CPG adherence may be a useful surrogate for quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim-Lin Chiew
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, NSW, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
| | - Shanley Chong
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia.,Healthy People & Places Unit, South Western Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten J Duggan
- Sydney and South West Sydney Clinical Cancer Registry, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Nasreen Kaadan
- Sydney and South West Sydney Clinical Cancer Registry, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Shalini K Vinod
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, NSW, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia.,University of Western Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ordikhani F, Erdem Arslan M, Marcelo R, Sahin I, Grigsby P, Schwarz JK, Azab AK. Drug Delivery Approaches for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer. Pharmaceutics 2016; 8:E23. [PMID: 27447664 PMCID: PMC5039442 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics8030023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Revised: 07/12/2016] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a highly prevalent cancer that affects women around the world. With the availability of new technologies, researchers have increased their efforts to develop new drug delivery systems in cervical cancer chemotherapy. In this review, we summarized some of the recent research in systematic and localized drug delivery systems and compared the advantages and disadvantages of these methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farideh Ordikhani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Biology Division, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA.
| | - Mustafa Erdem Arslan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Biology Division, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA.
| | - Raymundo Marcelo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Biology Division, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA.
| | - Ilyas Sahin
- Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
| | - Perry Grigsby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA.
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA.
| | - Julie K Schwarz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Biology Division, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA.
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA.
| | - Abdel Kareem Azab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Biology Division, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA.
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA.
| |
Collapse
|