1
|
Novel Biomarkers of Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Current Research and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225660. [PMID: 34830815 PMCID: PMC8616337 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Gastric cancer is characterized by poor survival rates despite surgery and chemotherapy. Current research focuses on biomarkers to improve diagnosis and prognosis, and to enable targeted treatment strategies. The aim of our review was to give an overview over the wide range of novel biomarkers in gastric cancer. These biomarkers are targets of a specific treatment, such as antibodies against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Other promising biomarkers for targeted therapies that have shown relevance in clinical trials are vascular endothelial growth factor, programmed cell death protein 1, and Claudin 18.2. There is a vast number of biomarkers based on DNA, RNA, and protein expression, as well as detection of circulating tumor cells and the immune tumor microenvironment. Abstract Overall survival of gastric cancer remains low, as patients are often diagnosed with advanced stage disease. In this review, we give an overview of current research on biomarkers in gastric cancer and their implementation in treatment strategies. The HER2-targeting trastuzumab is the first molecular targeted agent approved for gastric cancer treatment. Other promising biomarkers for targeted therapies that have shown relevance in clinical trials are VEGF and Claudin 18.2. Expression of MET has been shown to be a negative prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway with immune checkpoint inhibitors has proven efficacy in advanced gastric cancer. Recent technology advances allow the detection of circulating tumor cells that may be used as diagnostic and prognostic indicators and for therapy monitoring in gastric cancer patients. Prognostic molecular subtypes of gastric cancer have been identified using genomic data. In addition, transcriptome profiling has allowed a comprehensive characterization of the immune and stromal microenvironment in gastric cancer and development of novel risk scores. These prognostic and predictive markers highlight the rapidly evolving field of research in gastric cancer, promising improved treatment stratification and identification of molecular targets for individualized treatment in gastric cancer.
Collapse
|
2
|
de la Fouchardiere C, Decoster L, Samalin E, Terret C, Kenis C, Droz JP, Coutzac C, Smyth E. Advanced oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma in older patients in the era of immunotherapy. A review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 100:102289. [PMID: 34583303 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Gastric (G) and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas are of the most common and deadly cancers worldwide and affect mainly patients over 70 years at diagnosis. Older age has been associated in gastric cancers with distal tumour location, well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and microsatellite instability and is not identified itself as an independent prognostic factor. As immune checkpoint inhibitors recently changed the landmark of advanced G and GEJ adenocarcinomas treatment, we decided to perform a literature review to define the evidence-level of clinical data in older patients. This work underlined the lasting low -inclusion rate of older patients and -implementation rate of frailty screening tools in clinical trials in G/GEJ carcinomas. In the first-line metastatic setting, two prospective randomized phase III studies have specifically assessed the efficacy of chemotherapy in older patients with HER2-negative gastric cancers, demonstrating the feasibility of reduced dose oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen in this population. Only few data are available in HER2-positive tumors, or in the second-line setting. Furthermore, no specific trial with immune checkpoint inhibitors was performed in older frail patients whereas their benefit/adverse events ratio make them attractive candidates in this patient's population. We conclude that older fit patients can be treated in the same way as younger ones and included in clinical trials. Improving the outcome of older frail patients should be the oncology community next focus by implementing targeted interventions before initiating cancer therapy and designing specific clinical trials. Frailty screening tools and geriatric data collection have to be implemented in routine-practice and clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - L Decoster
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - E Samalin
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
| | - C Terret
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon, France
| | - C Kenis
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - J P Droz
- Medical Oncology, Claude-Bernard Lyon1 University, Lyon, France.
| | - C Coutzac
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon, France.
| | - E Smyth
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ho D, Quake SR, McCabe ERB, Chng WJ, Chow EK, Ding X, Gelb BD, Ginsburg GS, Hassenstab J, Ho CM, Mobley WC, Nolan GP, Rosen ST, Tan P, Yen Y, Zarrinpar A. Enabling Technologies for Personalized and Precision Medicine. Trends Biotechnol 2020; 38:497-518. [PMID: 31980301 PMCID: PMC7924935 DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Individualizing patient treatment is a core objective of the medical field. Reaching this objective has been elusive owing to the complex set of factors contributing to both disease and health; many factors, from genes to proteins, remain unknown in their role in human physiology. Accurately diagnosing, monitoring, and treating disorders requires advances in biomarker discovery, the subsequent development of accurate signatures that correspond with dynamic disease states, as well as therapeutic interventions that can be continuously optimized and modulated for dose and drug selection. This work highlights key breakthroughs in the development of enabling technologies that further the goal of personalized and precision medicine, and remaining challenges that, when addressed, may forge unprecedented capabilities in realizing truly individualized patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dean Ho
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore; The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Biomedical Engineering, NUS Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Stephen R Quake
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, CA, USA; Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, CA, USA; Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Wee Joo Chng
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Health System, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Edward K Chow
- Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xianting Ding
- Institute for Personalized Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bruce D Gelb
- Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Departments of Pediatrics and Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| | - Geoffrey S Ginsburg
- Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University, NC, USA
| | - Jason Hassenstab
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA; Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Chih-Ming Ho
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - William C Mobley
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Garry P Nolan
- Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Stanford University, CA, USA
| | - Steven T Rosen
- Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, CA, USA
| | - Patrick Tan
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yun Yen
- College of Medical Technology, Center of Cancer Translational Research, Taipei Cancer Center of Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ali Zarrinpar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation & Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Florida, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Gastric cancer is an active topic of clinical and basic research due to high morbidity and mortality. To date, gastrectomy and chemotherapy are the only therapeutic options for gastric cancer patients, but drug resistance, either acquired or primary, is the main cause for treatment failure. Differences in development and response to cancer treatments have been observed among ethnically diverse GC patient populations. In spite of major incidence, GC Asian patients have a significantly better prognosis and response to treatments than Caucasian ones due to genetic discordances between the two populations. Gene therapy could be an alternative strategy to overcome such issues and especially CRISPR/Cas9 represents one of the most intriguing gene-editing system. Thus, in this review article, we want to provide an update on the currently used therapies for the treatment of advanced GC. Graphical abstract.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cai H, Hou X, Ding Y, Fu Z, Wang L, Du Y. Prediction of gastric cancer prognosis in the next-generation sequencing era. TRADITIONAL MEDICINE AND MODERN MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.1142/s2575900019300029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies worldwide, and is caused by complex interactions of multiple risk factors such as environmental (Helicobacter pylori and Epstein–Barr Virus), hereditary (genetic alterations and epigenetic modifications), as well as dietary and lifestyle factors. GC is usually detected at an advanced stage, with a dismal prognosis. Even for patients with similar clinical or pathologic stage receiving similar treatment, the outcomes are still uneven and unpredictable. To better incorporate genetic and epigenetic profiles into GC prognostic predication, gene expression signatures have been developed to predict GC outcomes. More recently, the advancement of high-throughput sequencing technology, also known as next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, and analysis has provided the basis for accurate molecular classification of GC tumors. Here, we summarized and updated the literature related to NGS studies of GC, including whole-genome sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and targeted sequencing, and discussed current progresses. NGS has facilitated the identification of genetic/epigenetic targets for screening as well as development of targeted agent therapy, thus enabling individualized patient management and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China
| | - Xiaomei Hou
- PLA Marine Corps Hospital, Chaozhou, Guangdong 521000, P. R. China
| | - Yibo Ding
- Department of Epidemiology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, P. R. China
| | - Zhongxing Fu
- Ningguo Bio-Leader Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Anhui, Hefei, P. R. China
| | - Ling Wang
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 419 Fangxie Road, Shanghai 200090, P. R. China
- Institutes of Integrative Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive, Endocrine-related Diseases, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Yan Du
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 419 Fangxie Road, Shanghai 200090, P. R. China
- Institutes of Integrative Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang HL, Liu PF, Yue J, Jiang WH, Cui YL, Ren H, Wang H, Zhuang Y, Liu Y, Jiang D, Dong Q, Zhang H, Mi JH, Xu ZM, Tian CJ, Zhang ZZ, Wang XW, Su MN, Lu W. Somatic gene mutation signatures predict cancer type and prognosis in multiple cancers with pan-cancer 1000 gene panel. Cancer Lett 2019; 470:181-190. [PMID: 31765737 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Most cancers are caused by somatic mutations. Some common mutations in the same cancer type can form a "signature" to specifically predict the prognosis or to distinguish it from other cancers. In this study, 710 somatic cell mutations were identified in 142 cases, including digestive, lung and urogenital cancers, and the digestive cancers were further divided into liver, stomach, intestinal, esophageal and cardia cancer. The above mutations were located in 166 genes. In addition, a group of high-frequency mutation genes with specific characteristics were screened to form predictive signatures for each cancer. Verification using TCGA suggested that the signatures could predict the stages, progression-free survival, and overall survival of digestive, intestinal, and liver cancers (P < 0.05). The validation cases further confirmed the predictive role of digestive and liver cancers signatures in diagnosis and prognosis. Overall, this study established predictive signatures for different cancer systems and their subtypes. These findings enable a better understanding in cancer genome, and contribute to the personalized diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Long Wang
- Department of Oncology, Tianjin Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Peng-Fei Liu
- Department of Oncology, Tianjin Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Jie Yue
- Department of Esophageal Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Wen-Hua Jiang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Second Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yun-Long Cui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - He Ren
- Department of Pathology, Center of Tumour Immunology and Cytotherapy, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
| | - Han Wang
- Department of Applied Statistics, College of Science, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China
| | - Yan Zhuang
- Department of Colorectal Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yong Liu
- Department of Gastric Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Da Jiang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Qian Dong
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Prevebtive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Jia-Hui Mi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zan-Mei Xu
- Tianjin Marvel Medical Laboratory, Tianjin Marvelbio Technology Co.,Ltd, Tianjin, China
| | - Cai-Juan Tian
- Tianjin Marvel Medical Laboratory, Tianjin Marvelbio Technology Co.,Ltd, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhen-Zhen Zhang
- Tianjin Marvel Medical Laboratory, Tianjin Marvelbio Technology Co.,Ltd, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiao-Wei Wang
- Tianjin Marvel Medical Laboratory, Tianjin Marvelbio Technology Co.,Ltd, Tianjin, China
| | - Mei-Na Su
- Tianjin Marvel Medical Laboratory, Tianjin Marvelbio Technology Co.,Ltd, Tianjin, China
| | - Wei Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nair S, LLerena A. New perspectives in personalised medicine for ethnicity in cancer: population pharmacogenomics and pharmacometrics. Drug Metab Pers Ther 2018; 33:61-64. [PMID: 29688886 DOI: 10.1515/dmpt-2018-0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sujit Nair
- Amrita Cancer Discovery Biology Laboratory, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Amritapuri, Clappana P.O., Kollam - 690525, Kerala, India
| | - Adrián LLerena
- CICAB Clinical Research Centre at Extremadura University Hospital and Medical School, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guo Q, Guan GF, Cheng W, Zou CY, Zhu C, Cheng P, Wu AH. Integrated profiling identifies caveolae-associated protein 1 as a prognostic biomarker of malignancy in glioblastoma patients. CNS Neurosci Ther 2018; 25:343-354. [PMID: 30311408 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2018] [Revised: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Glioblastoma (GBM) is a lethal disease of the central nervous system with high mortality, and novel therapeutic targets and strategies for GBM are urgently needed. Caveolae-associated protein 1 (CAVIN1) is an essential caveolar component-encoding gene and has been poorly studied in glioma. To this end, in this study, we evaluated CAVIN1 expression in glioma tissue as well as the correlation between CAVIN1 expression and prognosis in glioma patients using the data collected from clinical samples or from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA), Rembrandt, and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data sets. METHODS Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test. The predictive role of CAVIN1 in progressive malignancy in glioma was evaluated by using a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. Gene ontology (GO), Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), and gene set variation analysis (GSVA) methods were used to interpret the functions of CAVIN1 in GBM. RESULTS CAVIN1 expression was elevated in GBM compared with that in low-grade glioma and nontumor brain samples and was correlated with unfavorable outcomes in glioma patients. Additionally, CAVIN1 could serve as an independent predictive factor for progressive malignancy in GBM. Furthermore, CAVIN1 was associated with disrupted angiogenesis and immune response in the tumor microenvironment of GBM. CONCLUSIONS We identified CAVIN1 as a prognostic biomarker and potential target for developing novel therapeutic strategies against GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Guo
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ge-Fei Guan
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Wen Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Cun-Yi Zou
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Chen Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Peng Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - An-Hua Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Inhibition of the CCL5/CCR5 Axis against the Progression of Gastric Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19051477. [PMID: 29772686 PMCID: PMC5983686 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19051477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Revised: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the progress made in molecular and clinical research, patients with advanced-stage gastric cancer (GC) have a bad prognosis and very low survival rates. Furthermore, it is challenging to find the complex molecular mechanisms that are involved in the development of GC, its progression, and its resistance to therapy. The interactions of chemokines, also known as chemotactic cytokines, with their receptors regulate immune and inflammatory responses. However, updated research demonstrates that cancer cells subvert the normal chemokine role, transforming them into fundamental constituents of the tumor microenvironment (TME) with tumor-promoting effects. C-C chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) is a chemotactic cytokine, and its expression and secretion are regulated in T cells. C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) is expressed in T cells, macrophages, other leukocytes, and certain types of cancer cells. The interaction between CCL5 and CCR5 plays an active role in recruiting leukocytes into target sites. This review summarizes recent information on the role of the CCL5 chemokine and its receptor CCR5 in GC cell proliferation, metastasis formation, and in the building of an immunosuppressive TME. Moreover, it highlights the development of new therapeutic strategies to inhibit the CCL5/CCR5 axis in different ways and their possible clinical relevance in the treatment of GC.
Collapse
|