Intracoronary brachytherapy following drug-eluting stent failure. It's still not time to hang up the spikes!

Verification and uniformity control of doses for Sr/Y intravascular brachytherapy sources using radiochromic film dosimetry

Intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) is a useful treatment modality for the recurrence of in-stent restenosis following drug-eluting stents (DES) or IVBT failure. The objective of this study was to measure the dose rate of (90)Sr/(90)Y IVBT sources for comparison with that given by the manufacturer and to control the dose uniformities of these sources along the source axis. The dose rates of (90)Sr/(90)Y beta sources were measured with a radiochromic film in a custom-made phantom. The films for calibration were irradiated using (60)Co photon beams. The results for the three sources were 4.5%, 2.3%, and 3.5% higher than the corresponding certificate values. Maximum and minimum of the dose rates varied within +/-10% of those at source center; and maximum dose discrepancy for the first (90)Sr/(90)Y source train was 8.2%; for the second source train, 7.1%; and for the third source train, 5.1%. Our study showed that the dose rates given by the manufacturer for the three (90)Sr/(90)Y IVBT sources were reliable and dose uniformities were within +/-10% along two thirds of the treatment length.

Combining sirolimus-eluting stents and external irradiation in cholesterol-fed rabbits increased incomplete stent apposition and decreased re-endothelialization

Restenosis after the implantation of a drug-eluting stent or after vascular irradiation therapy shares similar physiopathological mechanisms. No experimental data are currently available on vascular wall behavior after external irradiation on arteries stented with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). Ten New Zealand white rabbits received a 0.5% cholesterol-enriched chow for 1 month. Bilateral iliac artery stent implantation was then performed with an SES (Cypher; Cordis Corp). The animals were randomized into either an irradiated group (I, 2 Gy external x-ray irradiation, n = 5) or a control group (C, n = 5). The cholesterol-enriched chow was continued for 1 additional month after stent implantation. The stented arteries were harvested for histological analyses. The number and the percentage of incompletely apposed stents struts (IASS) were significantly higher in irradiated versus control group (3.05 +/- 0.46 vs. 1.57 +/- 0.27 IASS, P < 0.01, and 28.44% +/- 3.97% vs. 15.2% +/- 2.46% of IASS, P < 0.01, respectively). The mean neointimal thickness behind the IASS was also higher in the irradiated group (I: 28.3 +/- 2.5 microm vs. C: 18.2 +/- 2.3 microm, P < 0.01). Re-endothelialization was lower in irradiated group (I: 44.6% +/- 17.5% vs. C: 75.2% +/- 5.7%, P < 0.01). The present study revealed that low-dose external irradiation increased incomplete stent apposition and reduced re-endothelialization of SES. These results underscore the potential deleterious cumulative side effects of these 2 procedures to prevent restenosis.

Dose perturbation caused by stents: experiments with a model 90Sr/90Y source

PURPOSE

Biological effects of intravascular brachytherapy are very sensitive to discrepancies between the prescription and the applied dose. If brachytherapy is aimed at in-stent restenosis, shielding and shadowing effects of metallic stents may change the dose distribution relative to that produced by the bare source. The development of new generations of stents inspired us to a new experimental study in this field. The effect was studied for 14 stents which we have recently encountered in clinical practice.

METHODS

The model source was a continuous 20-mm column of (90)Sr/(90)Y solution sealed in a 1-mm-I.D. Plexiglas capillary. The dose distribution in the Plexiglas phantom was mapped using GafChromic MD-55-2 film. The stent masses varied from 2.5 to 25 mg; the strut thicknesses, from 0.075 to 0.15 mm; and the atomic numbers of stent materials, from 24 (Cr) to 79 (Au).

RESULTS

Dose perturbations depend on a variety of stent features. Local reduction of the mean dose rates near the reference distance (r(0) = 2 mm) varied from 11% to 47%. No simple correlation was found between these data and stent characteristics, but it seems that the atomic number of the stent material is less important than the strut thickness and mesh density.

CONCLUSION

The results provide a warning that clinical indications for in-stent radiation therapy must always be confronted with another aspect of the patient's history: the kind of implanted stent. Intravascular brachytherapy using pure beta sources may be recommended only for patients "wearing" light, thin-strut stents. The presence of thick-strut stents is a contraindication for this modality, due to excessive dose perturbation.

Feasibility and safety of intra-coronary Beta irradiation with 144Ce/Pr for prevention of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of in-stent restenotic lesions

BACKGROUND

Endovascular brachytherapy is a proven and efficacious treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with established long-term benefit. Owing to its complexity and logistic inconveniences, brachytherapy did not find wide acceptance, especially in the current drug-eluting stents era. We conducted a single center, non-randomized pilot trial with 144Ce/Pr, utilizing a new high-energy Beta emitting source, for prevention of restenosis after percutaneous treatment of in-stent restenotic lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty consecutive patients presenting in-stent restenosis were enrolled in the study. After conventional balloon angioplasty, 144Ce/Pr was applied to the dilated coronary segment at a dose of 21Gy. Technical feasibility, safety and efficacy of 144Ce/Pr at 9 months clinical and angiographic follow-up were tested. Thirty-seven arterial segments were irradiated with 100% technical success and no in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Five MACE were observed (13.5% of the treated segments) during 9 months follow-up, including four target lesion revascularizations and one episode of acute coronary syndrome secondary to sudden late thrombotic occlusion of the irradiated segment.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirmed the safety and the feasibility of the intra-coronary Beta irradiation utilizing the 144Ce/Pr source. It also shows some practical advantages compared to traditional Gamma or other Beta sources. Considering the high-risk restenosis profile of the selected patients (i.e. diffuse in-stent restenosis, bifurcation lesions, small vessels) these results are encouraging in terms of restenosis prevention. Late acute thrombosis remains a problem requiring further improvement.

Intracoronary radiation therapy for multi-drug resistant in-stent restenosis: Initial clinical experience

While randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the excellent efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) for de novo lesions, the optimal treatment for SES-restenosis is not known. Management may include stand-alone balloon angioplasty, repeat SES implantation, or placement of a drug-eluting stent (DES) with an alternative antiproliferative agent (i.e., a paclitaxel-eluting stent, PES). The appropriate management strategy for recurrent restenosis after PES implantation for SES restenosis is even less clear. We report the initial clinical experience with intracoronary radiation therapy (ICRT) for multi-DES resistant restenosis. We performed ICRT in five patients with recurrent restenosis after treatment with both SES and PES. Over a median follow-up of 256 days (range 75-489 days), one patient had a target lesion revascularization at 182 days and subsequently died at 483 days following the procedure. Our findings support the further study of this management approach.