Safety and efficacy of radial versus femoral access for rotational Atherectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rotational atherectomy of calcified coronary lesions: current practice and insights from two randomized trials

With growing experience, technical improvements and use of newer generation drug-eluting stents (DES), recent data showed satisfactory acute and long-term results after rotational atherectomy (RA) in calcified coronary lesions. The randomized ROTAXUS and PREPARE-CALC trials compared RA to balloon-based strategies in two different time periods in the DES era. In this manuscript, we assessed the technical evolution in RA practice from a pooled analysis of the RA groups of both trials and established a link to further recent literature. Furthermore, we sought to summarize and analyze the available experience with RA in different patient and lesion subsets, and propose recommendations to improve RA practice. We also illustrated the combination of RA with other methods of lesion preparation. Finally, based on the available evidence, we propose a simple and practical approach to treat severely calcified lesions.

Impact of Clinical Presentation on Outcomes After Rotational Atherectomy in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Rotational atherectomy (RA) is widely used in the percutaneous treatment of heavily calcified coronary artery lesions in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). However, the safety and efficacy of RA in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is not well established and is considered a relative contraindication. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RA in patients presenting with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), unstable angina (UA), and CCS. Consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with RA between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary single center were included. Patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) were excluded. The primary end points of interest were procedural success and procedural complications. The secondary end point was the risk of death or MI at 1 year. A total of 2,122 patients who underwent RA were included, of whom 1,271 presented with a CCS (59.9%), 632 presented with UA (29.8%), and 219 presented with NSTEMI (10.3%). Although an increased rate of slow-flow/no-reflow was noted in the UA population (p = 0.03), no significant difference in procedural success or procedural complications, including coronary dissection, perforation, or side-branch closure, was noted (p = NS). At 1 year, there were no significant differences in death or MI between CCS and non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS: UA + NSTEMI; adjusted hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 2.12); however, patients who presented with NSTEMI had a higher risk of death or MI than CCS (adjusted hazard ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 3.17). Use of RA in NSTE-ACS was associated with similar procedural success without an increased risk of procedural complications compared with patients with CCS. Although patients presenting with NSTEMI remained at higher risk of long-term adverse events, RA appears to be safe and feasible in patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions presenting with NSTE-ACS.

Cost reduction associated with transradial access in percutaneous coronary intervention: A report from a Japanese nationwide registry

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly performed via transradial access (TRA). This study aimed to investigate the clinical and economic benefits of TRA compared with transfemoral access (TFA) under universal healthcare coverage system in Japan.

Methods

A total of 36,153 patients (acute coronary syndrome [ACS], 15,266; stable ischemic heart disease [SIHD], 20,052) across 714 institutions in the Japanese nationwide PCI registry (J-PCI) in 2015 were analyzed (mean age 69.9 ± 11.1 years and 23.6% female). Cost was defined as the total amount of healthcare resources used to care for the patient during hospitalization. Propensity score matching analysis was conducted to balance the baseline characteristics of patients undergoing TRA and TFA.

Findings

The median total cost of PCI was JPY 1,341,176 (interquartile range, 959,052), with higher expenses for ACS (JPY 1,772,116 [1,117,107]) compared with SIHD (JPY 1,119,153 [540,440]) patients. Most patients underwent PCI via TRA (73.8%), and after propensity score matching, TRA was associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital death and bleeding (0.88% vs. 1.91% [P < 0.0001] and 2.18% vs. 4.53% [P < 0.0001] in ACS, and 0.10% vs. 0.28% [P = 0.070] and 0.53% vs. 1.72% [P < 0.0001] in SIHD, respectively), which led to lower costs in both ACS (JPY 1,699,279 [1,164,554] for TRA vs. JPY 1,931,255 [1,070,222] for TFA; P < 0.0001), and SIHD (JPY 1,102,352 [505,904] for TRA vs. JPY 1,311,525 [706,450] for TFA; P < 0.0001) patients.

Interpretation

In this direct cost analysis of a nationwide registry, the use of TRA was associated with cost saving for both ACS and SIHD patients.

Funding

This study was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grant nos. 20H03915, 16H05215, 16KK0186, 20K22883, and 21K08064), Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [AMED] (grant number 16lk1010004h0002), and the National Clinical Database. The J-PCI registry is led and supported by the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.

Safety of the transradial approach to carotid stenting

BACKGROUND

The multicenter prospective CREST-2 Registry (C2R) provides recent experience in performing carotid artery stenting (CAS) for interventionists to ensure safe performance of CAS.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the periprocedural safety of CAS performed using a transradial approach relative to CAS performed using a transfemoral approach.

METHODS

Patients with ≥70% asymptomatic and ≥50% symptomatic carotid stenosis, ≤80 years of age and at standard or high risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are eligible for the C2R. The primary endpoint was a composite of severe access-related complications. Comparisons were made using propensity-score matched logistic regression.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 67.6 ± 8.2 years and 1906 (35.1%) were female. Indications for CAS included 4063 (74.9%) for primary atherosclerosis. A total of 2868 (52.8%) cases underwent CAS for asymptomatic disease. Transradial access was used in 213 (3.9%) patients. The transradial cohort had lower use of general anesthesia (1.5% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.007) and higher use of distal embolic protection (96.7% vs. 89.4%, p = 0.0004). There were no significant differences between radial and femoral access groups in terms of a composite of major access-related complications (0% vs. 1.1%) or a composite of periprocedural stroke or death (3.3% vs. 2.4%; OR = 1.4 [confidence intervals 0.6, 3.1]; p = 0.42).

CONCLUSION

We found no significant differences in rates of major access-related complications or periprocedural stroke or death with CAS performed using transradial compared to transfemoral access. Our results support incorporation of the transradial approach to clinical trials comparing CAS to other revascularization techniques.

Transradial versus trans-femoral access site in high-speed rotational atherectomy in Sweden

BACKGROUND

Radial artery is the preferred access site in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, limited data exist regarding utilization pattern, safety, and long-term efficacy of transradial artery access (TRA) PCI in heavily calcified lesions using high-speed rotational atherectomy (HSRA).

METHODS

All patients who underwent HSRA-PCI in Sweden between 2005 and 2016 were included. Outcomes were major adverse cardiac events (MACE, including death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target vessel revascularisation (TVR)), in-hospital bleeding and restenosis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for the non-randomized access site selection.

RESULTS

We included 1479 patients of whom 649 had TRA and 782 transfemoral artery access (TFA) HSRA-PCI. The rate of TRA increased significantly by 18% per year but remained lower in HSRA-PCI (60%) than in the overall PCI population (85%) in 2016. TRA was associated with comparable angiographic success but significantly lower risk for major (adjusted OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.05-0.47) or any in-hospital bleeding (adjusted OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.13-0.78). At one year, the adjusted risk for MACE (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.67-1.13) and its individual components did not differ between TRA and TFA patients. The risk for restenosis did not significantly differ between TRA and TFA HSRA-PCI treated lesions (adjusted HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.46-1.81).

CONCLUSION

HSRA-PCI by TRA was associated with significantly lower risk for in-hospital bleeding and equivalent long-term efficacy when compared with TFA. Our data support the feasibility and superior safety profile of TRA in HSRA-PCI.

Percutaneous management of calcified coronary arteries - review of atherectomy and lithotripsy devices and why it is important

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) predisposes to suboptimal revascularization outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite the availability of several plaque modification devices, their rates of use remain low despite the prevalence of CAC encountered in clinical practice. It is important to understand how each device can be utilized in clinical practice in order to improve outcomes after PCI.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article summarizes the most recent clinical evidence for each plaque modification device. Although rotational atherectomy is the most frequently used device for plaque modification, the use of orbital atherectomy (OA) has been increasing. Balloon-based strategies including recent studies evaluating a novel intravascular lithotripsy balloon have shed light on the benefits of nonablative devices in modifying CAC during PCI.

SUMMARY

CAC poses significant technical challenges in achieving optimal stent results. Several intracoronary plaque modification devices are currently available and understanding the technical aspects, indications and contraindications to the use of each device is essential. Although rotational and OA are most commonly used, laser atherectomy and balloon-based devices may offer an advantage in certain lesion subsets.

Transradial Access for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications of the Risk-Treatment Paradox

[Figure: see text].

Rota-Lithotripsy-A Novel Bail-Out Strategy for Calcified Coronary Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndrome. The First-in-Man Experience

Heavy calcification remains one of the greatest challenges in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), especially in subjects with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In the present case series study of high-risk patients with ACS, including both STEMI and NSTEMI, we performed a rota-lithotripsy-a combination of rotational atherectomy with subsequent intravascular lithotripsy-as a novel bail-out strategy to facilitate stent delivery in a tortuous calcified coronary artery.