Deamidated gliadin peptide in pediatric patients with moderately increased tissue transglutaminase; does it help?

Performance Assessment of a Novel Multianalyte Methodology for Celiac Disease Biomarker Detection and Evaluation of the Serology-Alone Criteria for Biopsy-Free Diagnosis

CONTEXT.—

Serology plays a vital role in celiac disease (CD) diagnosis, and the latest European guidelines advocate for biopsy-free diagnoses in patients with ≥10× the upper limit of normal (ULN) of anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies.

OBJECTIVE.—

To assess performance characteristics of a novel automated particle-based multianalyte technology (Aptiva) for anti-tTG and anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibody detection as compared to the traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (QUANTA Lite). Performance characteristics of the ≥10× ULN anti-tTG IgA criteria for serologic diagnosis of CD were also evaluated.

DESIGN.—

Sera samples from 703 patients were tested for anti-tTG IgA, anti-tTG immunoglobulin G (IgG), anti-DGP IgA, and anti-DGP IgG antibodies on both platforms. In total, 127 patients had medical information and were classified as CD-positive (n = 58) and CD-negative (n = 69) based on biopsy results. Clinical performance characteristics were evaluated.

RESULTS.—

Anti-tTG IgA detection showed equal clinical sensitivity and specificity of 91% sensitivity and 99% specificity on both platforms. Anti-tTG IgG resulted in moderate sensitivity of 69% and 72%, but high specificity of 100% and 94% on Aptiva and QUANTA Lite, respectively. Anti-DGP IgG displayed comparable sensitivity of 90% and 81%, and a specificity of 94% and 99%, on Aptiva and QUANTA Lite, respectively. Anti-DGP IgA demonstrated greater sensitivity on QUANTA Lite (83%) than Aptiva (69%) and similar specificities of 97% and 98% on QUANTA Lite and Aptiva, respectively. At ≥10× ULN levels for anti-tTG IgA, Aptiva displayed a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 100%, and QUANTA Lite showed a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Aptiva is a reliable method to measure CD biomarkers with reduced hands-on necessity and high-throughput capabilities. This study supports the use of a ≥10× ULN anti-tTG IgA biopsy-free approach for serologic diagnosis of CD.

Variability in Celiac Serology Testing by Provider Type: A Single-Center Experience

To evaluate the ordering practices of celiac disease (CD) serologies by providers at a tertiary, academic, Children's Hospital and compare them to guidelines and best practices.

Methods

We analyzed celiac serologies ordered in 2018 by provider type (pediatric gastrointestinal (GI) specialists, primary care providers (PCPs), and nonpediatric GI specialists), and identified causes for variability and nonadherence.

Results

The antitissue transglutaminase antibody (tTG) IgA was ordered (n = 2504) most frequently by gastroenterologists (43%), endocrinologists (22%), and other (35%). Total IgA was ordered with tTG IgA for screening purposes in 81% of overall cases, but endocrinologists ordered it only 49% of the time. The tTG IgG was ordered infrequently (1.9%) compared with tTG IgA. Antideaminated gliadin peptide (DGP) IgA/IgG levels were also infrequently ordered (5.4%) compared with tTG IgA. The antiendomysial antibody was ordered sparingly (0.9%) compared with tTG IgA, but appropriately by providers with expertise in CD, similar to ordering for celiac genetics (0.8%). Of the celiac genetic tests, 15% were ordered in error. The positivity rate of the tTG IgA ordered by PCPs was 4.4%.

Conclusions

The tTG IgA was appropriately ordered by all types of providers. Endocrinologists inconsistently ordered total IgA levels with screening labs. DGP IgA/IgG tests were not commonly ordered but were inappropriately ordered by one provider. The low number of ordered antiendomysial antibody and celiac genetic tests suggests under-utilization of the nonbiopsy approach. The positive yield of tTG IgA ordered by PCPs was higher compared with previous studies.

Diagnostic Value of Immunoglobulin G Anti-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibody for Diagnosis of Pediatric Celiac Disease: A Study from Shiraz, Iran

PURPOSE

Screening serologic tests are important tools for the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD). Immunoglobulin (Ig)G anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (anti-DGP) is a relatively new autoantibody thought to have good diagnostic accuracy, comparable to that of anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibody.

METHODS

Pediatric patients (n=86) with a clinical suspicion of CD were included. Duodenal biopsy, anti-tTG, and IgG anti-DGP antibody tests were performed. The patients were divided into CD and control groups based on the pathological evaluation of duodenal biopsies. The diagnostic accuracy of serological tests was determined.

RESULTS

IgA anti-tTG and IgG anti-DGP antibodies were positive in 86.3% and 95.4% of patients, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the IgA anti-tTG test were 86.3%, 50.0%, and 68.6%, respectively, and those of the IgG anti-DGP test were 95.4%, 85.7%, and 90.7%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.91) for IgA anti-tTG test and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.86-0.97) for IgG anti-DGP test. The comparison of IgA anti-tTG and IgG anti-DGP ROC curves showed a higher sensitivity and specificity of the IgG anti-DGP test.

CONCLUSION

IgG anti-DGP is a reliable serological test for CD diagnosis in children. High tTG and DGP titers in the serum are suggestive of severe duodenal atrophy. The combined use of IgA anti-tTG and IgG anti-DGP tests for the initial screening of CD can improve diagnostic sensitivity.

To DGP-IgG or not? A comparison of TTG-IgA and DGP-IgG

BACKGROUND

We assessed the diagnostic utility of deamidated gliadin peptide immunoglobulin G (DGP-IgG) in pediatric patients without immunoglobulin A deficiency who underwent tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A (TTG-IgA) screening and biopsy.

METHODS

Patients who had TTG-IgA performed in our laboratory had sample frozen over a 1.5 y. If a patient underwent biopsy within 6 months of serology, DGP-IgG was performed on frozen sample. All testing was performed on the BioPlex 2200. Biopsies were assigned a modified Marsh-Oberhuber score. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for TTG-IgA and DGP-IgG for values ≥ 15 u/ml, 15-149 u/ml, and > 150 u/ml using biopsy as gold standard.

RESULTS

A total of 458 patients were included. Sensitivity and specificity for DGP-IgG ≥ 15 u/ml and Marsh ≥ 2 was 76% and 87.5% and TTG-IgA ≥ 15 was notably higher at 93.3% and 92.2%. Sensitivity and specificity of DGP-IgG were 66% and 88.9% at moderate and 29.3% and 98.4% at high increases. The positive predictive value of DGP-IgG for celiac disease in TTG-IgA negative patients was 2.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests DGP-IgG does not add significant value in patients screened for celiac disease.

Antibodies against neo-epitope of microbial and human transglutaminase complexes as biomarkers of childhood celiac disease

Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and microbial transglutaminase (mTG) cross-link gliadins to form complexes that expose immunogenic neo-epitopes to produce tTG and mTG-neo-epitope antibodies. The aim of this study was to test the diagnostic performance of antibodies against non-complexed and complexed forms of transglutaminases, to correlate their activities to the intestinal damage and to explore age group dependency in celiac disease (CD). A total of 296 children with untreated CD and 215 non-celiac disease controls were checked by in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays detecting immunoglobulin (Ig)A, IgG or combined detection of IgA and IgG (check) against tTG, AESKULISA® tTG New Generation (tTG-neo) and mTG-neo (RUO), IgA and IgG antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) and human IgA anti-endomysium antibodies (EMA) using AESKUSLIDES® EMA. Intestinal pathology was graded according the revised Marsh criteria, and age dependencies of the antibody activities were analysed. Using cut-offs estimated from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the highest area under curve (AUC) of the TG assays was 0·963 for tTG-neo check, followed by tTG check (0·962) when the diagnosis was based on enteric mucosal histology. tTG-neo check was the most effective to reflect the intestinal abnormalities in CD (r = 0·795, P < 0·0001). High levels of anti-mTG-neo IgG and anti-tTG-neo IgG appeared in the earlier age groups, as compared to anti-tTG IgG (P < 0·001). Considering antibody diagnostic performance based on AUC, enteric damage reflection and predictability at an early age, the anti-neo tTG check was the most effective diagnostic biomarker for pediatric CD. The mTG neo check might represent a new marker for CD screening, diagnosis and predictability.