Reference ranges of Presepsin in preterm infants in the first 48 h of life: A multicenter observational study

Perinatal asphyxia does not influence presepsin levels in neonates: A prospective study

AIM

To compare Presepsin (presepsin) levels in plasma and urine of uninfected newborn infants with perinatal asphyxia with those of controls.

METHODS

In this prospective study, we enrolled 25 uninfected full-term infants with perinatal asphyxia and 19 controls. We measured presepsin levels in whole blood or urine. In neonates with perinatal asphyxia, we compared presepsin levels in blood and urine at four time points.

RESULTS

In neonates with perinatal asphyxia, blood and urinary presepsin levels matched each other at any time point. At admission, the median presepsin value in blood was similar in both groups (p = 0.74), while urinary levels were higher in hypoxic neonates (p = 0.05). Perinatal asphyxia seemed to increase serum CRP and procalcitonin levels beyond normal cut-off but not those of presepsin.

CONCLUSION

In uninfected neonates with perinatal asphyxia, median blood and urinary presepsin levels matched each other at any point in the first 72 h of life and seemed to be slightly affected by the transient renal impairment associated with perinatal hypoxia in the first 12 h of life. Perinatal asphyxia did not influence presepsin levels within the first 72 h of life, while those of CRP and procalcitonin increased.

Advances in sepsis biomarkers

Sepsis, a dysregulated host immune response to an infectious agent, significantly increases morbidity and mortality for hospitalized patients worldwide. This chapter reviews (1) the basic principles of infectious diseases, pathophysiology and current definition of sepsis, (2) established sepsis biomarkers such lactate, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein, (3) novel, newly regulatory-cleared/approved biomarkers, such as assays that evaluate white blood cell properties and immune response molecules, and (4) emerging biomarkers and biomarker panels to highlight future directions and opportunities in the diagnosis and management of sepsis.

Can Presepsin Be Valuable in Reducing Unnecessary Antibiotic Exposure after Birth?

Background: Due to a lack of rapid, accurate diagnostic tools for early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) at the initial suspicion, infants are often unnecessarily given antibiotics directly after birth. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for EOS before antibiotic initiation and to investigate whether presepsin can be used to guide clinicians’ decisions on whether to start antibiotics. Methods: In this multicenter prospective observational cohort study, all infants who started on antibiotics for EOS suspicion were consecutively included. Presepsin concentrations were determined in blood samples collected at the initial EOS suspicion (t = 0). In addition to this, samples were collected at 3, 6, 12 and 24 h after the initial EOS suspicion and from the umbilical cord directly after birth. The diagnostic accuracy of presepsin was calculated. Results: A total of 333 infants were included, of whom 169 were born preterm. We included 65 term and 15 preterm EOS cases. At the initial EOS suspicion, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50–0.70) in the term-born infants compared to 0.84 (95% CI 0.73–0.95) in the preterm infants. A cut-off value of 645 pg/mL resulted in a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 54% in the preterm infants. The presepsin concentrations in cord blood and at other time points did not differ significantly from the concentrations at the initial EOS suspicion. Conclusions: Presepsin is a biomarker with an acceptable diagnostic accuracy for EOS (culture-proven and clinical EOS) in preterm infants and might be of value in reducing antibiotic exposure after birth when appended to current EOS guidelines. However, the small number of EOS cases prevents us from drawing firm conclusions. Further research should be performed to evaluate whether appending a presepsin-guided step to current EOS guidelines leads to a safe decrease in antibiotic overtreatment and antibiotic-related morbidity.

Distribution of Presepsin, Krebs von den Lungen 6, and Surfactant Protein A in Umbilical Cord Blood

Presepsin is an early indicator of infection, and Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) and Surfactant Protein A (SP-A) are related to the pathogenesis of pulmonary infection and fibrosis. This study aimed to establish reference intervals (RIs) of presepsin, KL-6, and SP-A levels and to evaluate the possible influence of neonatal and maternal factors on presepsin, KL-6, and SP-A levels in umbilical cord blood (UCB). Among a total of 613 UCB samples, the outliers were removed. The RIs for presepsin, KL-6, and SP-A levels were defined using non-parametric percentile methods according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (EP28-A3C). These levels were analyzed according to neonatal and maternal factors: neonatal sex, gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), Apgar score, delivery mode, the presence of premature rupture of membranes (PROM), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and pre-eclampsia. Presepsin, KL-6, and SP-A levels showed non-parametric distributions and left-skewed histograms. The RIs of presepsin, KL-6, and SP-A levels were 64.9–428.3 pg/mL, 43.0–172.0 U/mL, and 2.1–36.1 ng/mL, respectively. Presepsin, KL-6, and SP-A levels did not show significant differences according to sex, GA, BW, Apgar score, delivery mode, PROM, GDM, and pre-eclampsia. The median level and 97.5th centile RI of KL-6 showed a slight increase with increased GA. We established RIs for presepsin, KL-6, and SP-A levels in large-scaled UCB samples. Further investigation would be needed to determine the clinical significance.

Presepsin for the Diagnosis of Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) is a severe disease, particularly in preterm infants. Timely diagnosis can be challenging owing to unspecific presentation and questionable performance of the common markers of infection. Presepsin was recently proven to be a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of EOS.

Objective

To assess presepsin accuracy for the diagnosis of EOS.

Data Sources

PubMed Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. No publication date restrictions were applied. The literature search was limited to the English language. Articles were checked for duplication.

Study Selection

Inclusion criteria were studies that (1) included term or preterm newborns (defined as newborns with gestational age ≥37 weeks or <37 weeks, respectively); (2) included a diagnosis of EOS, defined as culture-proven sepsis for primary analysis and as either clinical or culture-proven sepsis for secondary analysis; and (3) assessed presepsin values during the initial workup for suspected EOS. Exclusion criteria were studies that (1) did not include EOS cases; (2) lacked data on presepsin sensitivity and/or specificity; and (3) were case reports, commentaries, or reviews. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy 2 tool, and data were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The outcomes of interest for both the primary and secondary analyses were presepsin sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio for the diagnosis of EOS.

Results

A total of 12 studies of 245 (4.9%) met inclusion criteria for the primary analysis. Twenty-three studies of 245 (9.4%) met the inclusion criteria for the secondary analysis. In the primary analysis, among 12 studies and 828 newborns of any gestational age, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.86-0.95) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85-0.95), respectively; pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 131.69 (95% CI, 54.93-310.94). Subgroup analysis showed that presepsin specificity was associated with the inclusion of only EOS or all neonatal sepsis. Presepsin accuracy was not associated with gestational age, measurement with chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay testing, country where the study was performed, or risk of bias judgment. In the secondary analysis, among 23 studies and 1866 newborns, accuracy was significantly associated with only test type.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that presepsin was an accurate biomarker of EOS. Clinical trials are warranted to assess its usefulness and safety to reduce early antibiotic exposure, particularly in preterm newborns.

Biomarkers of sepsis in pigs, horses and cattle: from acute phase proteins to procalcitonin

Sepsis is a complex clinical syndrome triggered by an inflammatory host response to an infection. It is usually complicated to detect and diagnose, and has severe consequences in human and veterinary health, especially when treatment is not started early. Therefore, efforts to detect sepsis accurately are needed. In addition, its proper diagnosis could reduce the misuse of antibiotics, which is essential fighting against antimicrobial resistance. This case is a particular issue in farm animals, as antibiotics have been traditionally given massively, but now they are becoming increasingly restricted. When sepsis is suspected in animals, the most frequently used biomarkers are acute phase proteins such as C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A and haptoglobin, but their concentrations can increase in other inflammatory conditions. In human patients, the most promising biomarkers to detect sepsis are currently procalcitonin and presepsin, and there is a wide range of other biomarkers under study. However, there is little information on the application of these biomarkers in veterinary species. This review aims to describe the general concepts of sepsis and the current knowledge about the biomarkers of sepsis in pigs, horses, and cattle and to discuss possible advances in the field.

Perinatal presepsin assessment: a new sepsis diagnostic tool?

Perinatal sepsis constitutes a medical emergency and is still one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity. The possibility of an early diagnosis of sepsis is still debated and controversial. In particular, clinical symptoms can be hidden by the association of sepsis with other perinatal diseases and/or by therapeutic strategies performed. In this context, there is evidence that the accuracy of standard of care diagnostic parameters (i.e. blood culture, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin) can be biased by additional confounding factors (gestational age, birth-weight, acute-chronic hypoxia). Therefore, the inclusion in clinical daily practice of new biomarkers of sepsis is of utmost importance. Of a panel of biomarkers, Presepsin (P-SEP) plays an important role in the development and response of the immune system and as an early marker of sepsis both in adult and pediatric patients. Therefore, in the present review we aim to offer an overview of the role of P-SEP in the early detection of perinatal sepsis as a trustworthy marker according to actual statements of official international institutions. Future perspectives regard the possibility of a longitudinal non-invasive biological fluids P-SEP assessment thus limiting the sample stress in high risk newborns.

Perinatal asphyxia partly affects presepsin urine levels in non-infected term infants

OBJECTIVES

Standard of care sepsis biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) can be affected by several perinatal factors, among which perinatal asphyxia (PA) has a significant role. In this light, new early sepsis biomarkers such as presepsin (P-SEP) are needed to enact therapeutic strategies at a stage when clinical and laboratory patterns are still silent or unavailable. We aimed at investigating the potential effects of PA on longitudinal P-SEP urine levels.

METHODS

We conducted an observational case-control study in 76 term infants, 38 with PA and 38 controls. Standard clinical, laboratory, radiological monitoring procedures and P-SEP urine measurement were performed at four time-points (first void, 24, 48, 96 h) after birth.

RESULTS

Higher (p<0.05) CRP and PCT blood levels at T1-T3 were observed in PA than control infants whilst no differences (p>0.05, for all) at T0 were observed between groups. P-SEP urine levels were higher (p<0.05) in PA at first void and at 24 h while no differences (p>0.05) at 48 and 96 h were observed. No significant correlations were found (p>0.05) between P-SEP and urea (R=0.11) and creatinine (R=0.02) blood levels, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results, showed that PA effects on P-SEP were limited up to the first 24 h following birth in absence of any kidney function bias. Data open the way to further investigations aimed at validating P-SEP assessment in non-invasive biological fluids as a reliable tool for early EOS and LOS detection in high-risk infants.

The Emerging Role of Presepsin (P-SEP) in the Diagnosis of Sepsis in the Critically Ill Infant: A Literature Review

Sepsis causes high rates of morbidity and mortality in NICUs. The estimated incidence varies between 5 and 170 per 1000 births, depending on the social context. In very low birth-weight neonates, the level of mortality increases with the duration of hospitalization, reaching 36% among infants aged 8-14 days and 52% among infants aged 15-28 days. Early diagnosis is the only tool to improve the poor prognosis of neonatal sepsis. Blood culture, the gold standard for diagnosis, is time-consuming and poorly sensitive. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, currently used as sepsis biomarkers, are influenced by several maternal and fetal pro-inflammatory conditions in the perinatal age. Presepsin is the N-terminal fragment of soluble CD14 subtype (sCD14-ST): it is released in the bloodstream by monocytes and macrophages, in response to bacterial invasion. Presepsin seems to be a new, promising biomarker for the early diagnosis of sepsis in neonates as it is not modified by perinatal confounding inflammatory factors. The aim of the present review is to collect current knowledge about the role of presepsin in critically ill neonates.

Presepsin (Soluble CD14 Subtype) as an Early Marker of Neonatal Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Diagnostic Trial

In the context of suspected neonatal sepsis, early diagnosis and stratification of patients according to clinical severity is not yet effectively achieved. In this diagnostic trial, we aimed to assess the accuracy of presepsin (PSEP) for the diagnosis and early stratification of supposedly septic neonates. PSEP, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT) were assessed at the onset of sepsis suspicion (T0), every 12–24 h for the first 48 h (T1–T4), and at the end of antibiotic therapy (T5). Enrolled neonates were stratified into three groups (infection, sepsis, septic shock) according to Wynn and Wong’s definitions. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) according to the severity of clinical conditions were assessed. We enrolled 58 neonates with infection, 77 with sepsis, and 24 with septic shock. PSEP levels were higher in neonates with septic shock (median 1557.5 pg/mL) and sepsis (median 1361 pg/mL) compared to those with infection (median 977.5 pg/mL) at T0 (p < 0.01). Neither CRP nor PCT could distinguish the three groups at T0. PSEP’s AUC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.854–0.943) for sepsis and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.885–0.988) for septic shock. Maximum Youden index was 1013 pg/mL (84.4% sensitivity, 88% specificity) for sepsis, and 971.5 pg/mL for septic shock (92% sensitivity, 86% specificity). However, differences in PSEP between neonates with positive and negative blood culture were limited. Thus, PSEP was an early biomarker of neonatal sepsis severity, but did not support the early identification of neonates with positive blood culture.