Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Pathology

Using red blood cell distribution width to predict death after abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture

BACKGROUND

An abdominal aortic aneurysm is a life-threatening enlargement in the major vessel at the abdomen level. This study investigated the associations between different levels of red blood cell distribution width and all-cause mortality among patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. It developed predictive models for all-cause mortality risk.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using 2001 to 2012 MIMIC-III dataset. The study sample included 392 U.S. adults with abdominal aortic aneurysms who were admitted to ICU after the aneurysm rupture. Then we used two single-factor and four multivariable logistic regression models to examine the associations between different levels of red blood cell distribution and all-cause mortality (30 days and 90 days), controlling for demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, and other laboratory measurements. The receiver operator characteristic curves were calculated, and the areas under the curves were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 140 (35.7%) patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm in the red blood cell distribution width range between 11.7 and 13.8%, 117 (29.8%) patients in the range between 13.9 and 14.9%, and 135 (34.5%) patients in the range between 15.0 and 21.6%. Patients with higher red blood cell distribution width level (> 13.8%) tended to have a higher mortality rate (both 30 days and 90 days), congestive heart failure, renal failure, coagulation disorders, lower hemoglobin, hematocrit, MCV, red blood cell count, higher levels of chloride, creatinine, sodium, and BUN (All P < 0.05). Results of multivariate logistic regression models indicated that patients with higher red blood cell distribution width levels (> 13.8%) had the highest statistically significant odd ratios of 30 days and 90 days of all-cause mortality than lower red blood cell distribution width levels. The area under the RDW curve was lower (P = 0.0009) than that of SAPSII scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture with a higher blood cell distribution had the highest risk of all-cause mortality. Using the blood cell distribution width level in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture to predict mortality should be considered in future clinical practice.

Avoiding Misdiagnosis of Abdominal Vascular Catastrophes

Abdominal vascular emergencies are an uncommon entity in emergency medicine, but when they present, they are often catastrophic. These time-sensitive and life-threatening diagnoses are often hidden in nonspecific complaints such as nausea, vomiting, or flank pain, so the emergency physician must remain diligent and consider these in the differential diagnoses. The following is an overview of the more common of these abdominal vascular emergencies, in the hope that they help the Emergency Physician avoid the misdiagnosis and subsequent vascular catastrophe that would follow.

Screening Older Adult Men for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Scoping Review

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a potentially fatal condition predominantly affecting older adult men (60 years or over). Based on evidence, preventative health-care guidelines recommend screening older males for AAA using ultrasound. In attempts to reduce AAA mortality among men, screening has been utilized for early detection in some Western countries including the UK and Sweden. The current scoping review includes 19 empirical studies focusing on AAA screening in men. The findings from these studies highlight benefits and potential harms of male AAA screening. The benefits of AAA screening for men include decreased incidence of AAA rupture, decreased AAA mortality, increased effectiveness of elective AAA repair surgery, and cost-effectiveness. The potential harms of AAA screening included lack of AAA mortality reduction, negative impacts on quality of life, and inconsistent screening eligibility criteria being applied by primary care practitioners. The current scoping review findings are discussed to suggest changes to AAA screening guidelines and improve policy and practice.

Gene-expression profiles of abdominal perivascular adipose tissue distinguish aortic occlusive from stenotic atherosclerotic lesions and denote different pathogenetic pathways

Perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) helps regulate arterial homeostasis and plays a role in the pathogenesis of large vessel diseases. In this study, we investigated whether the PVAT of aortic occlusive lesions shows specific gene-expression patterns related to pathophysiology. By a genome-wide approach, we investigated the PVAT transcriptome in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease. We compared the adipose layer surrounding the distal aorta (atherosclerotic lesion) with the proximal aorta (plaque-free segment), both within and between patients with complete aortoiliac occlusion (Oc) and low-grade aortic stenosis (St). We found that PVAT of the distal versus proximal aorta within both Oc- and St-patients lacks specific, locally restricted gene-expression patterns. Conversely, singular gene-expression profiles distinguished the PVAT between Oc- and St-patients. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that these signatures were associated with pathways related to metabolism of cholesterol, vessel tone regulation, and remodeling, including TGF-β and SMAD signaling. We finally observed that gene-expression profiles in omental-visceral or subcutaneous fat differentiated between Oc- and St-patients, suggesting that the overall adipose component associates with a different atherosclerosis burden. Our work points out the role of PVAT and, likely, other adipose tissues play in the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying atherosclerotic disease, including the abdominal aortic occlusive forms.

Post-Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Abdominal Pain: A Learning Experience

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is one of the important pathologies involving the abdominal aorta, as it can have adverse consequences if it goes unnoticed or untreated. AAA is defined as an abnormal dilation of the abdominal aorta 3 cm or greater. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has recently emerged as a treatment modality for AAA. It does have a few inherent complications that include endoleak, endograft migration, bleeding, ischemia, and compartment syndrome. This case report discusses a patient who came in with abdominal pain and a pulsatile mass, which raised concerns regarding endoleak. The patient had a 9.9-cm AAA, which was repaired in the past, as was made evident by computed tomography findings of the stent graft in the aneurysmal segment. This case stands out because it highlights the importance of comparing the size of the AAA at the time of the EVAR to the current scenario where the patient presents with abdominal pain of unknown etiology. Also, this case report highlights the importance of computed tomography and other imaging forms in following-up with patients who have EVAR for AAAs.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: concepts and controversies

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are a leading cause mortality and morbidity but often go undiagnosed until late stages unless imaging is performed. In 2005, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) for the first time recommended one-time ultrasound screening for elderly male smokers and selective screening in other populations. These guidelines were reaffirmed and updated in 2014; a proposal for potential further revisions is now in early planning stages. In this article, we review the past and current USPSTF AAA screening recommendations and techniques for performing optimal screening. Evidence supporting screening and alternative guidelines are also discussed. In addition, emerging concepts and controversies in AAA screening are highlighted, including conflicting data on screening benefits, screening underutilization, inconsistent follow-up recommendations, and the potential for duplicative testing, alternative screening modalities, and clinically significant incidental findings.