Post-combustion CO2 capture using supported K2CO3: Comparing physical mixing and incipient wetness impregnation preparation methods

Self-Assembled Core-Shell Structure MgO@TiO2 as a K2CO3 Support with Superior Performance for Direct Air Capture CO2

Traditional carbon capture and storage technologies for large point sources can at best slow the rate of increase in atmospheric CO2 concentrations. In contrast, direct capture of CO2 from ambient air, or "direct air capture" (DAC), offers the potential to become a truly carbon-negative technology. Composite solid adsorbents fabricated by impregnating a porous matrix with K2CO3 are promising adsorbents for the adsorption capture of CO2 from ambient air. Nevertheless, the adsorbent can be rapidly deactivated during continuous adsorption/desorption cycles. In this study, MgO-supported, TiO2-stabilized MgO@TiO2 core-shell structures were prepared as supports using a novel self-assembled (SA) method and then impregnated with 50 wt % K2CO3 (K2CO3/MgO@TiO2, denoted as SA-KM@T). The adsorbent exhibits a high CO2 capture capacity of ∼126.6 mg CO2/g sorbent in direct air adsorption and maintained a performance of 20 adsorption/desorption cycles at 300 °C mid-temperature, which was much better than that of K2CO3/MgO. Analysis proved that the core-shell structure of the support effectively inhibited the reaction between the active component (K2CO3) and the main support (MgO) by the addition of TiO2, resulting in higher reactivity, thermal stability, and antiagglomeration properties. This work provides an alternative strategy for DAC applications using adsorbents.

Study on Denitration Performance of Solid Waste Blast Furnace Slag Catalysts under Different Preparation Processes

In this article, blast furnace slag, a high-yield industrial solid waste, was taken as the research object and it was used as the main material. Bentonite was used as the binder, and water was added to shape the blast furnace slag into a small column. The denitration catalyst was prepared using different methods, its denitration performances were compared and analyzed, and the best preparation method and process parameters were screened. Results showed that bentonite will clearly improve denitration performance, and 4:1 blast furnace slag and bentonite was selected as the molding ratio to reduce the effect of bentonite on its performance, combined with the hardness and surface adhesion of the prepared carrier. Separately, the catalysts were prepared using citric acid impregnation, hydrothermal decomposition, and mixing method, and active Mn was loaded. Among them, the hydrothermal decomposition method cannot completely decompose in a closed kettle, resulting in a lower denitration performance. The catalyst prepared using the mixing method is superior to that prepared using the impregnation method because the active component prepared by the former was more uniformly dispersed, and simple and easy to operate, which can meet the needs of the excess denitration catalysts of small enterprises.