Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement for Treating Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Initial Experience With the NaviGate Bioprosthesis

Transcatheter treatment of the tricuspid valve: current status and perspectives

Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) are emerging as alternatives to surgery in high-risk patients with isolated or concomitant tricuspid regurgitation. The development of new minimally invasive solutions potentially more adapted to this largely undertreated population of patients, has fuelled the interest for the tricuspid valve. Growing evidence and new concepts have contributed to revise obsolete and misleading perceptions around the right side of the heart. New definitions, classifications, and a better understanding of the disease pathophysiology and phenotypes, as well as their associated patient journeys have profoundly and durably changed the landscape of tricuspid disease. A number of registries and a recent randomized controlled pivotal trial provide preliminary guidance for decision-making. TTVI seem to be very safe and effective in selected patients, although clinical benefits beyond improved quality of life remain to be demonstrated. Even if more efforts are needed, increased disease awareness is gaining momentum in the community and supports the establishment of dedicated expert valve centres. This review is summarizing the achievements in the field and provides perspectives for a less invasive management of a no-more-forgotten disease.

Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement: Illustrative Case Reports and Review of State-of-Art

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is one of the most common heart valve diseases, associated a with poor prognosis since significant TR is associated with an increased mortality risk compared to no TR or mild regurgitation. Surgery is the standard treatment for TR, although it is associated with high morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospitalization, particularly in tricuspid reoperation after left-sided surgery. Thus, several innovative percutaneous transcatheter approaches for repair and replacement of the tricuspid valve have gathered significant momentum and have undergone extensive clinical development in recent years, with favorable clinical outcomes in terms of mortality and rehospitalization during the first year of follow-up. We present three clinical cases of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement in an orthotopic position with two different innovative systems along with a review of the state-of-the-art of this emergent topic.

Transjugular Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Implantation of LuX-Valve Bioprosthesis in a Preclinical Model

The purpose of this preclinical study in a sheep model was to confirm the feasibility and safety of the LuX-Valve transjugular tricuspid valve (TV) replacement apparatus and to optimize the implantation procedure before beginning first-in-man study. The LuX-Valve was implanted in a sheep model (n = 8) via transjugular approach. Six of eight sheep underwent successful implantation procedure on beating heart. The first two sheep died during the prostheses deployment. In the remaining 6 sheep that survived, postoperative echocardiography results showed there was no paravalvular leakage (PVL) and central tricuspid regurgitation in 5 animals, whereas 1 animal had mild PVL. The mean transvalvular gradient was 1.1 ± 0.9 mm Hg at the 4-week follow-up. No right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) obstruction, device malposition, pericardial effusion, coronary artery compression, or arrhythmias were observed. This technology may be a promising alternative for TR patients who are at high risk for open-heart surgery. Transjugular tricuspid valved-stent implantation. a Transjugular tricuspid valve replacement in a sheep model. b and c Valved stent. d, e, and f Schematic depiction of the implantation procedure.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions: Current status and future perspectives

The development of transcatheter therapies to treat valvular heart diseases has changed the rules of the game, particularly in the case of aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation. In the last years, the tricuspid valve has also been the focus of these percutaneous techniques for several reasons: (1) tricuspid regurgitation is a frequent disease associated with poor clinical outcomes in spite of medical treatment, leading to end-stage right ventricular heart failure, (2) surgical tricuspid valve repair or replacement has been the treatment of choice for patients with tricuspid valve disease, but high mortality rates for isolated surgical tricuspid valve intervention have been reported in the literature, and (3) most patients with tricuspid pathology are ultimately denied cardiac surgery because of their comorbidity burden. Thus, in this context the development of less invasive catheter-based therapies would be of high clinical relevance. The present review provides an overview regarding the framework of chronic tricuspid regurgitation transcatheter therapeutic options, summarizes the transcatheter systems under clinical use or clinical evaluation with their technical features, and describes the updated current evidence in this challenging and evolving field.

Transcatheter Double Valve Replacement to Treat Aortic Stenosis and Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation with 3D Printing Guidance after Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement

Background: Transcatheter treatments of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) have been emerging as alternatives for high-risk patients. In contrast to the immobilization of the common transcatheter tricuspid device, using a radial force-independent stent valve device at the native tricuspid annular site has several distinct advantages. Case summary: A 76-year-old patient with renal insufficiency who underwent mechanical mitral valve replacement in 2001 and transcatheter aortic valve replacement in 2021 due to severe aortic stenosis presented with chest pain and shortness of breath. Echocardiography suggested that the flow velocities of the mitral mechanical valve and aortic prosthetic valve were both within the normal range, with no significant paravalvular regurgitation; the tricuspid valve exhibited massive regurgitation (VMAX 258 cm/s, PGMAX 27 mmHg). Due to the high surgical risk, we simulated the procedure with a three-dimensional (3D)-printed model and performed transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement using a LuX-Valve (Ningbo Jenscare Biotechnology Co., Ningbo, China). Discussion: We describe transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement using the LuX-Valve and preprocedural guidance with 3D printing. Postprocedural TR was significantly reduced, indicating that 3D printing plays an important role in preprocedural guidance and that the LuX-Valve was safe and practicable for tricuspid valve replacement.

Twelve-month outcomes of the LuX-Valve for transcatheter treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Severe functional tricuspid regurgitation is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Conventional surgical risk for patients with advanced tricuspid regurgitation stage is high. Alternative approaches are therefore required.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility, technical details, and midterm outcomes of implantation of a novel radial force-independent orthotopic transcatheter tricuspid valve -the LuX-Valve- in patients with severe functional tricuspid regurgitation.

METHODS

The implantations of the LuX-Valve were performed in six patients with left-sided valvular surgery and secondary massive tricuspid regurgitation. The anatomy of the tricuspid valve and right heart measurements were evaluated by echocardiography and computed tomography in all patients. Conventional right ventricular (RV) function parameters and RV global longitudinal strain were obtained at baseline and 12-month follow-up. LuX-Valve implantation was performed under the guidance of digital subtraction angiography and transoesophageal echocardiography.

RESULTS

All patients had successful implantations of LuX-Valves through the right atrium with a substantial reduction in the degree of tricuspid regurgitation. Although one patient with moderate paravalvular leakage died because of right heart failure during three-month follow-up, the five patients who lived had no significant paravalvular leakage, and displayed significant improvements in mean transvalvular gradient, right heart sizes, conventional RV function indices and RV global longitudinal strain, and a reduction in New York Heart Association Functional Class during 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement with the LuX-Valve was feasible and safe for patients with severe functional tricuspid regurgitation. This strategy seems a promising treatment option for patients at high surgical risk.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions: Current devices and associated evidence

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common finding in patients with chronic cardiopathy, and often a marker of an advanced disease. Being silent or with symptoms intertwined with the primitive left heart disease, TR has often been neglected, leading to the late referral of patients with advanced right-heart failure. Hence, isolated tricuspid surgery has been associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, the worse of all valve interventions, and medical management has been limited to symptomatic treatment. In this context, percutaneous therapies for severe TR have gained traction, addressing the unmet therapeutic gap for a less invasive disease-modifying management. The aim of this review is to provide an updated overview on transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions, focusing on devices' characteristics, associated evidence, and future perspectives.

Imaging for transcatheter native tricuspid valve intervention: patient selection, procedural planning and interventional guidance

There are an increasing number of transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions being performed worldwide using commercially available and investigational devices. Imaging in the pre-procedural and periprocedural period is essential for procedural and clinical success. Echocardiographic-based techniques are particularly important in these procedures, especially for interventional guidance. This review summarizes the current devices in use and how imaging is used for patient selection, procedural planning, and interventional guidance. The most commonly used method of transcatheter tricuspid intervention is edge-to-edge repair using the MitraClip or TriClip devices (Abbott, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Randomized controlled data is pending but observational studies have demonstrated success, especially in the setting of smaller coaptation gaps and adequate transesophageal imaging windows. Direct annuloplasty with the Cardioband (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) has also been used in many centers and has demonstrated success when the anatomy and mechanism of tricuspid regurgitation are appropriate for annuloplasty based on imaging evaluation. Lastly, transcatheter valve replacement is becoming more common using several investigational devices and relies heavily on imaging methods to achieve procedural success.

Early Multinational Experience of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement for Treating Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this registry was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of transcatheter tricuspid valve implantation (TTVI) in patients with extreme surgical risk.

BACKGROUND

Isolated tricuspid regurgitation (TR) surgery is associated with high in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients (mean age 75 ± 10 years; 56% women) from 10 institutions, with symptomatic functional TR, had institutional and notified body approval for compassionate use of the GATE TTVI system. Baseline, discharge, and 30-day follow-up echocardiographic data and procedural, in-hospital, and follow-up clinical outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

At baseline, all patients had multiple comorbidities, severe or greater TR, and reduced baseline right ventricular function. Technical success was achieved in 26 of 30 patients (87%). Device malpositioning occurred in 4 patients, with conversion to open heart surgery in 2 (5%). Of those who received the device, 100% had reductions in TR of ≥1, and 75% experienced reductions of ≥2 grades, resulting in 18 of 24 of patients (76%) with mild or less TR at discharge. All patients had mild or less central TR. There was continued improvement in TR grade between discharge and 30 days in 15 of 19 patients (79%). In-hospital mortality was 10%. At mean follow-up of 127 ± 82 days, 4 patients (13%) had died. Of patients alive at follow-up, 62% were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II, with no late device-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Compassionate treatment of severe, symptomatic functional TR using a first-generation TTVI device is associated with significant reduction in TR and improvement in functional status with acceptable in-hospital mortality. Further studies are needed to determine the appropriate patient population and long-term outcomes with TTVI therapy.

Update on Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement Therapies

Severe tricuspid regurgitation is relatively common, especially in the elderly, and portends poor survival. Neither medical therapy nor conventional surgery is efficacious for most patients. In contrast, transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions are showing promise to improve quality of life and mortality. Although there is more clinical experience with transcatheter tricuspid valve repair, there are many patients for which repair is either not possible or cannot optimally reduce the severity of tricuspid regurgitation. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement is rapidly emerging and may ultimately become the preferred treatment option. In this review, we discuss transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement, analyze the devices in development and in clinical trials, and highlight the advantages and drawbacks of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement vs. repair.

Imaging for Tricuspid Valve Repair and Replacement

Primary or secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR) represents an important health care burden and challenge which has often been neglected or undertreated in the past. The expansion and reinforcement of the indications for tricuspid valve (TV) intervention in the 2017 editions of the guidelines as well as the introduction of transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) has considerably increased the attention of the community on the TV and the volume of TV interventions in the past years. Depending on the anatomic target, TTVI can be categorized as the following: 1) direct or indirect tricuspid restrictive annuloplasty; 2) direct (edge-to-edge repair) or indirect (coaptation device) restoration of leaflet coaptation; 3) heterotopic tricuspid valve implantation; and 4) transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement. Multimodality imaging has crucial role for the following: 1) patient selection for TTVI and procedure planning; 2) guiding and monitoring the procedure; and 3) assessing and following over time the results of the procedure. The key points for pre-procedural imaging are: 1) accurate quantitation of TR severity; 2) proper identification of the mechanism(s) responsible for the TR; and 3) quantitation of RV dysfunction and pulmonary arterial hypertension. This imaging work-up is essential to select the right type of intervention for the right patient and TV. Transesophageal echocardiography and fluoroscopy imaging is also key for guiding the TTVI procedures and fusion between these 2 modalities may further enhance the quality of procedure guiding.