Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Valvular Heart Disease: A Comprehensive Review

Tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in a 72-year-old patient with a left ventricular assist device and prior mitral edge-to-edge repair: a case report

Background

We report a case of a 72-year-old patient developing a significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) 6 years after a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The aim of this case is to demonstrate the feasibility of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of the tricuspid valve and the excellent clinical benefit in long-term follow-up in an LVAD patient.

Case summary

Our patient presented with recurrent acute heart failure syndrome. After a fulminant myocarditis in 2005, his previous treatment consisted of cardiac resynchronization therapy, TEER of the mitral valve, and LVAD (HeartMate III) implantation. At that point in time, his TR was only mild to moderate. Due to recurrent hospitalization despite optimized heart failure medication, we decided to treat the patient with a tricuspid TEER. His immediate post-interventional result and 1-year follow-up showed an excellent outcome with only minimal TR on transoesophageal echocardiogram.

Discussion

In general, TR improves after LVAD implantation. However, there are two possible pathophysiological mechanisms, which result in an increasing TR: firstly, supporting LV dysfunction may lead to a leftward shift of the interventricular septum with restriction of the tricuspid leaflets. Secondly, the increase of venous preload with LVAD support may result in an annular dilatation with secondary TR, particularly in patients with pre-existing right ventricular dysfunction. According to the data currently available, the unpredictable course of developing TR necessitates regular clinical examination and echocardiographic investigation. Treatment with TEER appears to be feasible and safe, with excellent 1-year results in patients with previously implanted LVADs.

Concurrent valvular procedures during left ventricular assist device implantation and outcomes: A comprehensive analysis of the Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy With HeartMate 3 trial portfolio

BACKGROUND

Correction of valvular disease is often undertaken during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation with uncertain benefit. We analyzed clinical outcomes with HeartMate 3 (HM3; Abbott) LVAD implantation in those with various concurrent valve procedures (HM3+VP) with those with an isolated LVAD implant (HM3 alone).

METHODS

The study included 2200 patients with HM3 implanted within the Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) trial portfolio who underwent 820 concurrent procedures among which 466 (21.8%) were HM3+VP. VPs included 101 aortic, 61 mitral, 163 tricuspid; 85 patients had multiple VPs. Perioperative complications, major adverse events, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent HM3+VP had higher-acuity Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profiles (1-2: 41% vs 31%) compared with no VPs (P < .05). The cardiopulmonary bypass time (124 vs 76 minutes; P < .0001) and hospital length of stay (20 vs 18 days; P < .0001) were longer in HM3+VP. A higher incidence of stroke (4.9% vs 2.4%), bleeding (33.9% vs 23.8%), and right heart failure (41.5% vs 29.6%) was noted in HM3+VP at 0 to 30 days (P < .01), with no difference in 30-day mortality (3.9% vs 3.3%) or 2-year survival (81.7% vs 80.8%). Analysis of individual VP showed no differences in survival compared to HM3 alone. No differences were noted among patients with either significant mitral (moderate or worse) or tricuspid (moderate or worse) regurgitation with or without corrective surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent VPs, commonly performed during LVAD implantation, are associated with increased morbidity during the index hospitalization, with no effect on short- and long-term survival. There is sufficient equipoise to consider a randomized trial on the benefit of commonly performed VPs (such as mitral or tricuspid regurgitation correction), during LVAD implantation.

Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support: JACC Scientific Statement

Despite advances in medical therapy for patients with stage C heart failure (HF), survival for patients with advanced HF is <20% at 5 years. Durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD) support is an important treatment option for patients with advanced HF. Innovations in dLVAD technology have reduced the risk of several adverse events, including pump thrombosis, stroke, and bleeding. Average patient survival is now similar to that of heart transplantation at 2 years, with 5-year dLVAD survival now approaching 60%. Unfortunately, greater adoption of dLVAD therapy has not been realized due to delayed referral of patients to advanced HF centers, insufficient clinician knowledge of contemporary dLVAD outcomes (including gains in quality of life), and deprioritization of patients with dLVAD support waiting for heart transplantation. Despite these challenges, novel devices are on the horizon of clinical investigation, offering smaller size, permitting less invasive surgical implantation, and eliminating the percutaneous lead for power supply.

The Impact of Left Ventricular Assist Device Outflow Graft Positioning on Aortic Hemodynamics: Improving Flow Dynamics to Mitigate Aortic Insufficiency

Heart failure is a global health concern with significant implications for healthcare systems. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide mechanical support for patients with severe heart failure. However, the placement of the LVAD outflow graft within the aorta has substantial implications for hemodynamics and can lead to aortic insufficiency during long-term support. This study employs computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to investigate the impact of different LVAD outflow graft locations on aortic hemodynamics. The introduction of valve morphology within the aorta geometry allows for a more detailed analysis of hemodynamics at the aortic root. The results demonstrate that the formation of vortex rings and subsequent vortices during the high-velocity jet flow from the graft interacted with the aortic wall. Time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) and oscillatory shear index (OSI) indicate that modification of the outflow graft location changes mechanical states within the aortic wall and aortic valve. Among the studied geometric factors, both the height and inclination angle of the LVAD outflow graft are important in controlling retrograde flow to the aortic root, while the azimuthal angle primarily determines the rotational direction of blood flow in the aortic arch. Thus, precise positioning of the LVAD outflow graft emerges as a critical factor in optimizing patient outcomes by improving the hemodynamic environment.

Acute heart failure and valvular heart disease: A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association, the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology

Acute heart failure (AHF) represents a broad spectrum of disease states, resulting from the interaction between an acute precipitant and a patient's underlying cardiac substrate and comorbidities. Valvular heart disease (VHD) is frequently associated with AHF. AHF may result from several precipitants that add an acute haemodynamic stress superimposed on a chronic valvular lesion or may occur as a consequence of a new significant valvular lesion. Regardless of the mechanism, clinical presentation may vary from acute decompensated heart failure to cardiogenic shock. Assessing the severity of VHD as well as the correlation between VHD severity and symptoms may be difficult in patients with AHF because of the rapid variation in loading conditions, concomitant destabilization of the associated comorbidities and the presence of combined valvular lesions. Evidence-based interventions targeting VHD in settings of AHF have yet to be identified, as patients with severe VHD are often excluded from randomized trials in AHF, so results from these trials do not generalize to those with VHD. Furthermore, there are not rigorously conducted randomized controlled trials in the setting of VHD and AHF, most of the data coming from observational studies. Thus, distinct to chronic settings, current guidelines are very elusive when patients with severe VHD present with AHF, and a clear-cut strategy could not be yet defined. Given the paucity of evidence in this subset of AHF patients, the aim of this scientific statement is to describe the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and overall treatment approach for patients with VHD who present with AHF.

Mitral regurgitation severity at left ventricular assist device implantation is associated with distinct myocardial transcriptomic signatures

OBJECTIVES

We examined for differences in pre-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation myocardial transcriptome signatures among patients with different degrees of mitral regurgitation (MR).

METHODS

Between January 2018 and October 2019, we collected left ventricular (LV) cores during durable LVAD implantation (n = 72). A retrospective chart review was performed. Total RNA was isolated from LV cores and used to construct cDNA sequence libraries. The libraries were sequenced with the NovaSeq system, and data were quantified using Kallisto. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and Gene Ontology analyses were performed, with a false discovery rate <0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Comparing patients with preoperative mild or less MR (n = 30) and those with moderate-severe MR (n = 42), the moderate-severe MR group weighted less (P = .004) and had more tricuspid valve repairs (P = .043), without differences in demographics or comorbidities. We then compared both groups with a group of human donor hearts without heart failure (n = 8). Compared with the donor hearts, there were 3985 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for mild or less MR and 4587 DEGs for moderate-severe MR. Specifically altered genes included 448 DEGs for specific for mild or less MR and 1050 DEGs for moderate-severe MR. On GSEA, common regulated genes showed increased immune gene expression and reduced expression of contraction and energetic genes. Of the 1050 genes specific for moderate-severe MR, there were additional up-regulated genes related to inflammation and reduced expression of genes related to cellular proliferation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing durable LVAD implantation with moderate-severe MR had increased activation of genes related to inflammation and reduction of cellular proliferation genes. This may have important implications for myocardial recovery.

Transcatheter valvular therapies in patients with left ventricular assist devices

Aortic, mitral and tricuspid valve regurgitation are commonly encountered in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs). These valvular heart conditions either develop prior to CF-LVAD implantation or are induced by the pump itself. They can all have significant detrimental effects on patients' survival and quality of life. With the improved durability of CF-LVADs and the overall rise in their volume of implants, an increasing number of patients will likely require a valvular heart intervention at some point during CF-LVAD therapy. However, these patients are often considered poor reoperative candidates. In this context, percutaneous approaches have emerged as an attractive “off-label” option for this patient population. Recent data show promising results, with high device success rates and rapid symptomatic improvements. However, the occurrence of distinct complications such as device migration, valve thrombosis or hemolysis remain of concern. In this review, we will present the pathophysiology of valvular heart disease in the setting of CF-LVAD support to help us understand the underlying rationale of these potential complications. We will then outline the current recommendations for the management of valvular heart disease in patients with CF-LVAD and discuss their limitations. Lastly, we will summarize the evidence related to transcatheter heart valve interventions in this patient population.

Considerations of valvular heart disease in children with ventricular assist devices

Ventricular assist devices have become a valuable tool in the treatment of heart failure in children. The use of ventricular assist devices has decreased mortality in children with end-stage heart failure awaiting transplant. It is not uncommon for children with end-stage heart failure associated with cardiomyopathy or congenital heart disease to have significant systemic semilunar and atrioventricular valve regurgitation, which can impact the efficiency and efficacy of hemodynamic support provided by a ventricular assist device. Therefore, implanting clinicians should carefully assess for valve abnormalities that may need repair and impact device selection and cannulation strategy to effectively support this diverse population. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of this important and relevant topic and to discuss strategies for managing these patients.

Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Primer For the General Cardiologist

Durable implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been shown to improve survival and quality of life for patients with stage D heart failure. Even though LVADs remain underused overall, the number of patients with heart failure supported with LVADs is steadily increasing. Therefore, general cardiologists will increasingly encounter these patients. In this review, we provide an overview of the field of durable LVADs. We discuss which patients should be referred for consideration of advanced heart failure therapies. We summarize the basic principles of LVAD care, including medical and surgical considerations. We also discuss the common complications associated with LVAD therapy, including bleeding, infections, thrombotic issues, and neurologic events. Our goal is to provide a primer for the general cardiologist in the recognition of patients who could benefit from LVADs and in the principles of managing patients with LVAD. Our hope is to "demystify" LVADs for the general cardiologist.

Key questions about aortic insufficiency in patients with durable left ventricular assist devices

The development of the latest generation of durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) drastically decreased adverse events such as pump thrombosis or disabling strokes. However, time-related complications such as aortic insufficiency (AI) continue to impair outcomes following durable LVAD implantation, especially in the context of long-term therapy. Up to one-quarter of patients with durable LVAD develop moderate or severe AI at 1 year and its incidence increases with the duration of support. The continuous regurgitant flow within the left ventricle can compromise left ventricular unloading, increase filling pressures, decrease forward flow and can thus lead to organ hypoperfusion and heart failure. This review aims to give an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical consequences of AI in patients with durable LVAD.

Concomitant or late aortic valve intervention and its efficacy for aortic insufficiency associated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation

Moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (AI) in patients who underwent continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation is a significant complication. According to the INTERMACS registry analysis, at least mild AI occurs in 55% of patients at 6 months after CF-LVAD implantation and moderate to severe AI is significantly associated with higher rates of re-hospitalization and mortality. The clinical implications of these data may underscore consideration of prophylactic aortic valve replacement, or repair, at the time of CF-LVAD implantation, particularly with expected longer duration of support and in patients with preexisting AI that is more than mild. More crucially, even if a native aortic valve is seemingly competent at the time of VAD implantation, we frequently find de novo AI as time goes by, potentially due to commissural fusion in the setting of inconsistent aortic valve opening or persistent valve closure caused by CF-LVAD support, that alters morphological and functional properties of innately competent aortic valves. Therefore, close monitoring of AI is mandatory, as the prognostic nature of its longitudinal progression is still unclear. Clearly, significant AI during VAD support warrants surgical intervention at the appropriate timing, especially in patients of destination therapy. Nonetheless, such an uncertainty in the progression of AI translates to a lack of consensus regarding the management of this untoward complication. In practice, proposed surgical options are aortic valve replacement, repair, closure, and more recently transcatheter aortic valve implantation or closure. Transcatheter approach is of course less invasive, however, its efficacy in terms of long-term outcome is limited. In this review, we summarize the recent evidence related to the pathophysiology and surgical treatment of AI associated with CF-LVAD implantation.

Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) in Patients With Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD)

BACKGROUND

Patients with left ventricular assist device often develop aortic insufficiency requiring an intervention on the aortic valve. We sought to analyze the outcomes of patients with a history of LVAD who underwent either transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmission Database was used to extract relevant patient information from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. The NRD is a nationally representative sample of all-payer discharges from U.S. non-federal hospitals. The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, clinical outcomes, costs, and 30-day all-cause readmissions. Complex samples multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to determine the association of procedure type with outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 148 hospitalizations with a history of LVAD, 87 underwent TAVR, and 61 underwent SAVR. The inpatient mortality in SAVR group was numerically higher compared to the TAVR cohort, however, it did not reach statistical significance. The use of invasive mechanical ventilation, and rates of cardiogenic shock, bleeding, and vascular complications were higher in the SAVR cohort compared to the TAVR cohort. The mean length of stay and costs were higher in the SAVR cohort compared to the TAVR cohort. The 30-day all-cause readmission rate was numerically higher in the SAVR group but not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

TAVR in patients with LVAD may be a viable treatment option for patients with AI with potential for better inpatient mortality and inpatient outcomes compared to patients who undergo SAVR in appropriately selected patients.

Impact of progressive aortic regurgitation on outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation

Aortic regurgitation (AR) following continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation (cf-LVAD) may adversely impact outcomes. We aimed to assess the incidence and impact of progressive AR after cf-LVAD on prognosis, biomarkers, functional capacity and echocardiographic findings. In an analysis of the PCHF-VAD database encompassing 12 European heart failure centers, patients were dichotomized according to the progression of AR following LVAD implantation. Patients with de-novo AR or AR progression (AR_1) were compared to patients without worsening AR (AR_0). Among 396 patients (mean age 53 ± 12 years, 82% male), 153 (39%) experienced progression of AR over a median of 1.4 years on LVAD support. Before LVAD implantation, AR_1 patients were less frequently diabetic, had lower body mass indices and higher baseline NT-proBNP values. Progressive AR did not adversely impact mortality (26% in both groups, HR 0.91 [95% CI 0.61-1.36]; P = 0.65). No intergroup variability was observed in NT-proBNP values and 6-minute walk test results at index hospitalization discharge and at 6-month follow-up. However, AR_1 patients were more likely to remain in NYHA class III and had worse right ventricular function at 6-month follow-up. Lack of aortic valve opening was related to de-novo or worsening AR (P < 0.001), irrespective of systolic blood pressure (P = 0.67). Patients commonly experience de-novo or worsening AR when exposed to continuous flow of contemporary LVADs. While reducing effective forward flow, worsening AR did not influence survival. However, less complete functional recovery and worse RV performance among AR_1 patients were observed. Lack of aortic valve opening was associated with progressive AR.

Degenerative changes of the aortic valve during left ventricular assist device support

AIMS

Donor heart shortage leads to increasing use of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as bridge-to-transplant or destination therapy. Prolonged LVAD support is associated with aortic valve insufficiency, representing a relevant clinical problem in LVAD patients. Nevertheless, the impact of LVAD support on inflammation, remodelling, and chondro-osteogenic differentiation of the aortic valve is still not clearly understood. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of LVAD support on structural and molecular alterations of the aortic valve.

METHODS AND RESULTS

During heart transplantation, aortic valves of 63 heart failure patients without (n = 22) and with LVAD support (n = 41) were collected and used for analysis. Data on clinical course as well as echocardiographic data were analysed. Calcification and markers of remodelling, chondro-osteogenic differentiation, and inflammation were evaluated by computed tomography, by mRNA analysis and by histology and immunohistochemistry. Expression of inflammation markers of the LVAD group was analysed with regard to levels of C-reactive protein and driveline infections. Calcium accumulation and mRNA expression of determined markers were correlated with duration of LVAD support. Data were also analysed relating to aortic valve opening and aortic valve insufficiency. There was no difference in the frequency of cardiovascular risk factors or comorbidities between the patient groups. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (P = 0.007), alpha-smooth muscle actin (P = 0.045), and osteopontin (P = 0.003) were up-regulated in aortic valves of LVAD patients. Histological appearance of the aortic valve was similar in patients with or without LVAD, and computed tomography-based analysis not yet revealed significant difference in tissue calcification. Expression of interferon gamma (P = 0.004), interleukin-1 beta (P < 0.0001), and tumour necrosis factor alpha (P = 0.04) was up-regulated in aortic valves of LVAD patients without concomitant inflammatory cell infiltration and independent from unspecific inflammation. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (P = 0.038) and transforming growth factor beta (P = 0.0504) correlated negatively with duration of LVAD support. Presence of aortic valve insufficiency led to a significantly higher expression of interferon gamma (P = 0.007) in LVAD patients. There was no alteration in the determined markers in relation to aortic valve opening in LVAD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Left ventricular assist device support leads to signs of early aortic valve degeneration independent of support duration. Thus, the aortic valve of patients with LVAD support should be closely monitored, particularly in patients receiving destination therapy as well as in the prospect of using aortic valves of LVAD patients as homografts in case of bridge-to-transplant therapy.

Aortic insufficiency associated with Impella that required surgical intervention upon implantation of the durable left ventricular assist device

The Impella is an axial-flow percutaneous ventricular assist device for cardiogenic shock. In this report, we describe two patients who developed aortic insufficiency (AI) associated with Impella and required surgical intervention upon implantation of the durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Both patients presented with cardiogenic shock and underwent insertion of Impella 5.0 as a bridge to decision. The cardiac function in these patients did not improve and obtaining approval for heart transplantation required time. They were managed with Impella for 91 and 98 days, respectively. In both cases, moderate AI that was not present before Impella insertion was observed when the Impella was removed. Therefore, we performed aortic valve closure to control the AI during durable LVAD implantation. In patients with durable LVAD implantation, AI may occur and progress after the operation in several cases. Aortic valve surgery is often performed to prevent deterioration of AI, especially in patients with AI before the surgery. Hence, AI is an important complication following Impella device implantation as a bridge to decision. Careful observation of AI is essential when the Impella is removed as the evaluation of AI by echocardiogram during Impella management is cumbersome because of device-generated artifacts.