Multidisciplinary Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer--An Evolving Landscape? Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14:251-261. [PMID: 26210575 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.06.002]

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in rectal cancer treatment within an expert center

The objective of this study was to evaluate treatment outcomes in patients who underwent the TaTME procedure for cancer of the middle and low rectum in an expert center. Prospective analysis of the outcomes of all consecutive patients treated using the TaTME technique for cancer of the middle and distal rectum at the our medical center between March 1, 2015, and March 31, 2022. A total of 128 patients (34 women, 94 men; mean age 66.01 [38-85] years) with cancer of the middle and distal rectum qualified for TaTME. TaTME procedures were performed in 127/128 (99.22%) patients. Complications of surgery were observed in 22/127 (17.32%) patients. Negative proximal and distal margins were confirmed in all 127 patients. Complete (R0) resection of the mesorectum was confirmed in 125/127 (98.43%) and nearly complete (R1) resection was confirmed in 2/127 (1.57%) patients. The average follow-up period was 795 days (296-1522) days. Local recurrence was detected during the follow-up period in 2/127 (1.57%) patients. This study showed that the TaTME procedure is an effective and safe method for the minimally invasive treatment of middle and low rectal cancers, particularly within an expert center setting.

mFOLFOX4 with or without radiation in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced middle and low rectal cancer

Context

Neoadjuvant therapy can reduce the recurrence rate of locally advanced middle and low rectal cancer. Radiation therapy can not only bring benefits but also produce acute and late toxicity, which will affect the quality of life and organ function of patients; the application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy can avoid the toxicity of radiotherapy.

Aims

To investigate the efficiency and side effects of preoperative modified FOLFOX4 (mFOLFOX4) chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for locally advanced middle and low rectal cancer (LAMLRC).

Methods and Material

This study included 431 patients with LAMLRC receiving mFOLFOX4 chemotherapy independently or combined with radiotherapy before operation. The basic information, efficacy indicators, and adverse reactions of the two groups were recorded in detail. Side effects were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 3.0.

Statistical Analysis Used

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science, IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 22). Mann-Whitney test and Chi-square test were used for comparative analysis. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Results

Of 128 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 52 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), and 76 received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). The average operation time in the NCT group was 2.71 h, and that in the NCRT group was 3.35 h (P = 0.005). The pathological complete remission rates in the NCT and NCRT groups were 1.9% and 17.1%, respectively (P = 0.007). There was no significant difference in the T-stage decline rate and lymph node positive rate between the two groups. There were higher rates of leukopenia (32.7% vs. 57.9%; P < 0.05) and diarrhea (0% vs. 9.2%; P < 0.05) in the NCRT group. The 3-year overall survival rates in the NCT and NCRT groups were 80.3% and 82.8% (P = 0.715), respectively, and the respective 3-year disease-free survival rates were 68.8% and 70.5% (P = 0.966).

Conclusions

NCT with mFOLFOX4 independently resulted in a lower pathological complete remission rate, with less toxicity and shorter operation time. NCT with mFOLFOX4 has certain clinical usefulness.

Induction chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin followed by chemoradiotherapy before surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has a high incidence of local and distant relapse even after adequate treatment. The emerging role of neoadjuvant induction chemotherapy may allow initial down staging of the primary tumor, less toxicity and early treatment of micrometastatic disease followed by chemoradiation with the hope of increased complete response rates before surgery OBJECTIVES: To identify the effect of induction chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiation (CCRTH) in locally advanced rectal cancer in terms of response and toxicity. Primary end point is assessment of pathological complete response rate after surgery. Secondary end points are disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after 3 years follow up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with MRI based criteria for staging high-risk LARC (T4 tumors, tumors within 2 mm of mesorectal fascia, T3 tumors at or below levators and T2-4 with LN +ve tumors) were included. Thirty-five patients were recruited. Patients received 12 weeks of induction capecitabine/oxaliplatin followed by concomitant capecitabine and conventional 3D-conformal radiotherapy. Surgery was done at least 6 weeks later .

RESULTS

Five patients (20.8%) had a pathological complete response (TRG 0) (ypT0N0). Another three patients (12.5%) had near complete pathological response (TRG 1). Regarding OS and pathological complete response corrlelation, it was statistically not significant in relation to patients with incomplete pathological response (p = 1).

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy could be a promising option for better response rates either clinical or pathological for high risk LARC patients with acceptable toxicity.

MRI-based radiomics to predict response in locally advanced rectal cancer: comparison of manual and automatic segmentation on external validation in a multicentre study

Background

Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is achieved in 15–30% of cases. Our aim was to implement and externally validate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics pipeline to predict response to treatment and to investigate the impact of manual and automatic segmentations on the radiomics models.

Methods

Ninety-five patients with stage II/III LARC who underwent multiparametric MRI before chemoradiotherapy and surgical treatment were enrolled from three institutions. Patients were classified as responders if tumour regression grade was 1 or 2 and nonresponders otherwise. Sixty-seven patients composed the construction dataset, while 28 the external validation. Tumour volumes were manually and automatically segmented using a U-net algorithm. Three approaches for feature selection were tested and combined with four machine learning classifiers.

Results

Using manual segmentation, the best result reached an accuracy of 68% on the validation set, with sensitivity 60%, specificity 77%, negative predictive value (NPV) 63%, and positive predictive value (PPV) 75%. The automatic segmentation achieved an accuracy of 75% on the validation set, with sensitivity 80%, specificity 69%, and both NPV and PPV 75%. Sensitivity and NPV on the validation set were significantly higher (p = 0.047) for the automatic versus manual segmentation.

Conclusion

Our study showed that radiomics models can pave the way to help clinicians in the prediction of tumour response to chemoradiotherapy of LARC and to personalise per-patient treatment. The results from the external validation dataset are promising for further research into radiomics approaches using both manual and automatic segmentations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41747-022-00272-2.

Transrectal endoscopic drainage with vacuum-assisted therapy in patients with anastomotic leaks following rectal cancer resection

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the gold standard for the treatment of malignant tumors of the rectum. Intestinal anastomotic leakage remains a serious complication of colorectal surgery. The efficacy and safety of transrectal endoscopic drainage by vacuum therapy in patients with intestinal anastomotic leakage after surgical treatment of middle and distal rectal tumors were assessed.

METHODS

Prospective analysis of treatment outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for middle and distal rectal tumors at the Department of General, Gastroenterological, and Oncological Surgery of the Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz and Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun from 2016 to 2019 was conducted.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients with middle and distal rectal tumors underwent laparoscopic resection. Intestinal anastomotic leak was identified in 18 (22.79%) patients [all men, mean age 61.39 (43-86) years] during the postoperative period. Primary protective ileostomy was performed in 8/18 (44.44%) patients. All 18 patients were treated with endoluminal vacuum therapy via transrectal endoscopic drainage. The mean time from surgery to the diagnosis of leakage and initiation of endoscopic treatment was 16 (3-728) days. The mean number of endoscopic procedures per patient was 6 (1-11). The mean duration of endoscopic treatment was 22 (4-43) days. Complications of endotherapy occurred in 2/18 (11.11%) patients treated endoscopically for bleeding from the abscess cavity. Success of endoluminal vacuum therapy was achieved in 17/18 (94.44%) patients. Moreover, 5/18 (27.78%) patients required ileostomy during the endoscopic treatment. The mean follow-up period was 368 (118-724) days. Long-term success of transrectal endoscopic drainage using vacuum-assisted therapy was achieved in 15/18 (83.33%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic rectal drainage using vacuum-assisted therapy is an effective and safe minimally invasive treatment in patients with intestinal anastomotic leaks following resection procedures within the middle and distal rectum.

Biology-and Location-Oriented Precision Treatment of Rectal Cancer: Present and Future

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach in rectal cancer treatment has evolved in the last decades and a standardized surgical technique for tumor resection - total mesorectal excision - has been established.

SUMMARY

In a multidisciplinary effort with the use of total mesorectal excision in combination with adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments to compliment surgery disease management can achieve excellent long-term local control and improved patient survival. Further improvements in imaging techniques and the ability to identify prognostic factors such as tumor regression, extramural venous invasion, and threatened margins have introduced the concept of decision-making based on preoperative staging information.

KEY MESSAGE

Therefore, in the modern era treatment algorithms are based on high-resolution imaging to plan neoadjuvant therapy and precision surgery followed by pathological and molecular analysis to stratify patients for the need of adjuvant chemotherapy. Despite excellent results with guideline structured treatment pathways, there is still a need to improve long-term results especially for individuals with locally advanced or metastatic tumors.

Challenges and shifting treatment strategies in the surgical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer

The current standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in Korea and Western countries is a multimodal approach incorporating preoperative long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy. This approach has significantly improved local control and reduced recurrence rates; however, the overall survival benefit has not been established. Although LCRT is a good option, there remain challenging unresolved problems for colorectal surgeons. We focused on four challenging issues in this review article. The first is LARC with resectable liver metastases, for which there has been no consensus regarding optimal management and practice thus far. The second is cancer progression at the time of restaging after completion of preoperative LCRT. To date, there have been few reports on this issue. The third is early recurrence after TME following preoperative LCRT, the reason for which is thought to be the delayed systemic chemotherapy in the preoperative LCRT protocol. The fourth is cost-effectiveness. The preoperative LCRT protocol takes 5 weeks. After a 6-8-week waiting period, surgery is performed. Therefore, it is more time-consuming than short-course chemoradiotherapy. To overcome these issues, total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) modalities, performed using various protocols, have been conducted globally based on cumulative experience. We also attempted to discuss previous TNT protocols in this article. One treatment strategy is not sufficient for patients with varying clinical characteristics. Therefore, we should revisit current treatment strategies based on recent clinical experience.

Improving quality of care and clinical outcomes for rectal cancer through clinical audits in a multicentre cancer care organisation

Introduction

Colorectal cancer treatment requires a complex, multidisciplinary approach. Because of the potential variability, monitoring through clinical audits is advisable. This study assesses the effects of a quality improvement action plan in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and treated with radiotherapy.

Methods

Comparative, multicentre study in two cohorts of 120 patients each, selected randomly from patients diagnosed with rectal cancer who had initiated radiotherapy with a curative intent. Based on the results from a baseline clinical audit in 2013, a quality improvement action plan was designed and implemented; a second audit in 2017 evaluated its impact.

Results

Standardised information was present on 77.5% of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging reports. Treatment strategies were similar in all three study centres. Of the patients whose treatment was interrupted, just 9.7% received a compensation dose. There was an increase in MRI re-staging from 32.5 to 61.5%, and a significant decrease in unreported circumferential resection margins following neoadjuvant therapy (ypCRM), from 34.5 to 5.6% (p <  0.001).

Conclusions

The comparison between two clinical audits showed improvements in neoadjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients. Some indicators reveal areas in need of additional efforts, for example to reduce the overall treatment time.

Emerging strategies in the initial management of locally advanced rectal cancer

The initial management of locally advanced rectal cancer continues to evolve and formulating the ideal treatment plan remains challenging, with a multitude of emerging treatment strategies and either limited or inconsistent data to support these. The main objective of neoadjuvant treatment is to maximize disease control and minimize toxicity and impact on quality of life. Ultimately, the optimal approach needs to be personalized to the individual. In this Review, we discuss the various strategies currently used and being further investigated in the initial treatment of patients presenting with locally advanced rectal cancer. We describe the evidence behind the current standard of care recommendations and emerging new options, as well as potential biomarkers that may assist with further refining treatment selection.

Maintenance BEZ235 Treatment Prolongs the Therapeutic Effect of the Combination of BEZ235 and Radiotherapy for Colorectal Cancer

Our previous study demonstrated that administration of NVP-BEZ235 (BEZ235), a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, before radiotherapy (RT) enhanced the radiotherapeutic effect in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells both in vitro and in vivo. Here, we evaluated whether maintenance BEZ235 treatment, after combinatorial BEZ235 + RT therapy, prolonged the antitumor effect in CRC. K-RAS mutant CRC cells (HCT116 and SW480), wild-type CRC cells (HT29), and HCT116 xenograft tumors were separated into the following six study groups: (1) untreated (control); (2) RT alone; (3) BEZ235 alone; (4) RT + BEZ235; (5) maintenance BEZ235 following RT + BEZ235 (RT + BEZ235 + mBEZ235); and (6) maintenance BEZ235 following BEZ235 (BEZ235 + mBEZ235). RT + BEZ235 + mBEZ235 treatment significantly inhibited cell viability and increased apoptosis in three CRC cell lines compared to the other five treatments in vitro. In the HCT116 xenograft tumor model, RT + BEZ235 + mBEZ235 treatment significantly reduced the tumor size when compared to the other five treatments. Furthermore, the expression of mTOR signaling molecules (p-rpS6 and p-eIF4E), DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair-related molecules (p-ATM and p-DNA-PKcs), and angiogenesis-related molecules (VEGF-A and HIF-1α) was significantly downregulated after RT + BEZ235 + mBEZ235 treatment both in vitro and in vivo when compared to the RT + BEZ235, RT, BEZ235, BEZ235 + mBEZ235, and control treatments. Cleaved caspase-3, cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), 53BP1, and γ-H2AX expression in the HCT116 xenograft tissue and three CRC cell lines were significantly upregulated after RT + BEZ235 + mBEZ235 treatment. Maintenance BEZ235 treatment in CRC cells prolonged the inhibition of cell viability, enhancement of apoptosis, attenuation of mTOR signaling, impairment of the DNA-DSB repair mechanism, and downregulation of angiogenesis that occurred due to concurrent BEZ235 and RT treatment.

The value of oxaliplatin in the systemic treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate, in a context of innovative multidisciplinary clinical practice, the efficacy of oxaliplatin in adjuvant administration (chemotherapy, CT) in relation to the total administered dose, in terms of prognosis with other clinical and therapeutic factors, in the heterogeneous model of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), which is characterized by a risk pattern of dominant systemic progression.

METHODS

Observational-analytical, retrospective, unicentric, non-randomized study of two cohorts of patients receiving FOLFOX-4 induction CT in neoadjuvancy, radiochemotherapy and surgery, differing in that one cohort did not receive any adjuvant post-surgical treatment and the other one received adjuvant CT with FOLFOX-4 cycles. A total of 212 patients from the Radiotherapy Oncology Service at the University Hospital Gregorio Marañon were studied: the neoadjuvant CT treatment group with oxaliplatin consisted of 110 patients and adjuvant CT treatment group with oxaliplatin consisted of 102 patients. The median follow-up time for the whole study population was 72 months (6 years).

RESULTS

The sociodemographic, clinical and diagnostic characteristics were very similar in both cohorts of patients, but with a pattern of therapeutic selection towards elements of adversity in pathological post-neoadjuvant staging. The dose of oxaliplatin in adjuvance (postoperative) superior to 6 cycles was positively associated with the locoregional control (LRC) at 5 years (P=0.012) and with the overall survival (OS) (P=0.048) at 5 years. In the responders to neoadjuvance with oxaliplatin [patients with tumor regression grade (TRG 3-4)], the dose of oxaliplatin greater than 5 cycles in adjuvance (postoperative) was positively associated with OS (P=0.06). And the dose of oxaliplatin in the range of 4-5 cycles in adjuvance (postoperative) was positively associated with distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the cohort of responding patients (P=0.015 and 0.004, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The contribution of adjuvant oxaliplatin in the oncological evolution shows a favorable effect of LRC, DMFS, DFS and OS in the subgroups of patients that exhibit elements of response to neoadjuvant oxaliplatin (categories TRG 3-4, and pN0, downstaging T, downstaging N). Therefore, this neoadjuvant response profile with oxaliplatin, measured with highly reliable methodology (validated microscopic pathological response scales), defines a population of oxaliplatin-sensitive patients who benefits significantly from the administration of adjuvant oxaliplatin in sufficient cumulative doses (more of 5 cycles).

Contemporary management of locally advanced rectal cancer: Resolving issues, controversies and shifting paradigms

Advancements in rectal cancer treatment have resulted in improvement only in locoregional control and have failed to address distant relapse, which is the predominant mode of treatment failure in rectal cancer. As the efficacy of conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) reaches a plateau, the need for alternative strategies in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has grown in relevance. Several novel strategies have been conceptualized to address this issue, including: 1) neoadjuvant induction and consolidation chemotherapy before CRT; 2) neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone to avoid the sequelae of radiation; and 3) nonoperative management for patients who achieved pathological or clinical complete response after CRT. This article explores the issues, recent advances and paradigm shifts in the management of LARC and emphasizes the need for a personalized treatment plan for each patient based on tumor stage, location, gene expression and quality of life.

Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic vs open rectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To review evidence on the short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic (LRR) vs open rectal resection (ORR) for rectal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using Cochrane Central Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, OpenGrey and ClinicalTrials.gov register for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing LRR vs ORR for rectal cancer and reporting short-term clinical outcomes. Articles published in English from January 1, 1995 to June, 30 2016 that met the selection criteria were retrieved and reviewed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statements checklist for reporting a systematic review was followed. Random-effect models were used to estimate mean differences and risk ratios. The robustness and heterogeneity of the results were explored by performing sensitivity analyses. The pooled effect was considered significant when P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Overall, 14 RCTs were included. No differences were found in postoperative mortality (P = 0.19) and morbidity (P = 0.75) rates. The mean operative time was 36.67 min longer (95%CI: 27.22-46.11, P < 0.00001), the mean estimated blood loss was 88.80 ml lower (95%CI: -117.25 to -60.34, P < 0.00001), and the mean incision length was 11.17 cm smaller (95%CI: -13.88 to -8.47, P < 0.00001) for LRR than ORR. These results were confirmed by sensitivity analyses that focused on the four major RCTs. The mean length of hospital stay was 1.71 d shorter (95%CI: -2.84 to -0.58, P < 0.003) for LRR than ORR. Similarly, bowel recovery (i.e., day of the first bowel movement) was 0.68 d shorter (95%CI: -1.00 to -0.36, P < 0.00001) for LRR. The sensitivity analysis did not confirm a significant difference between LRR and ORR for these latter two parameters. The overall quality of the evidence was rated as high.

CONCLUSION

LRR is associated with lesser blood loss, smaller incision length, and longer operative times compared to ORR. No differences are observed for postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Current issues of preoperative radio(chemo)therapy and its future evolution in locally advanced rectal cancer

Neoadjuvant therapies are effective for local control and tumor downstaging. Up to date, preoperative long-course chemoradiotherapy and short-course radiotherapy are the two primary guideline-recommended neoadjuvant therapies for locally advanced rectal cancer patients. However, clinicians throughout the world are trying their best to further optimize the regimens and concepts of neoadjuvants. Hence, there is an urgent need to summarize evidence regarding indications of neaoadjuvant therapies and relative merits of current standard regimens. In addition, we also reviewed the optimized regimens mainly based on short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery, consolidation chemotherapy, induction chemotherapy, chemotherapy alone without radiation and concepts in terms of organ preservation and personalized treatments to further explore the future evolution of neoadjuvant therapies in rectal cancer.

Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The use of laparoscopy for advanced-stage rectal cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the operative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic (LAR) versus open anterior rectal resection (OAR) for patients with pT4 rectal cancer.

METHODS

This is a multicenter propensity score matching (PSM) study of patients undergoing elective curative-intent LAR or OAR for pT4 rectal cancer (TNM stage II/III/IV) between 2005 and 2015.

RESULTS

In total, 137 patients were included in the analysis. After PSM, demographic, clinical and tumor characteristics were similar between the 52 LAR and the 52 OAR patients. Overall, 52 tumors were located in the high rectum, 25 in the mid-rectum and 27 in the low rectum. Multivisceral resection was performed in 26.9% of LAR and 30.8% of OAR patients (p = 0.829). Conversion was required in 11 LAR patients (21.2%). The LAR group showed significantly shorter time to flatus (3.13 vs. 4.97 days, p = 0.001), time to regular diet (3.59 vs. 6.36 days, p < 0.0001) and hospital stay (15.49 vs. 17.96 days, p = 0.002) compared to the OAR group. The 90-day morbidity and mortality were not different between groups. In the majority of patients (85.6%), R0 resection was achieved. A complete mesorectal excision was obtained in 82.7% of LAR and 78.8% of OAR patients (p = 0.855). The 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were, respectively, 95.6, 73.8 and 66.7% for the LAR group and 86.7, 66.9 and 64.1% for the OAR group (p = 0.219). The presence of synchronous metastases (hazard ratio 2.26), R1 resection (HR 2.71) and lymph node involvement (HR 2.24) were significant predictors of overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that LAR for pT4 rectal cancer can achieve good pathologic and oncologic outcomes similar to open surgery despite the risk of conversion. Moreover, laparoscopy offers the benefits of a faster recovery and a shorter hospital stay.

Impact of Surgical Complications Following Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma on Adjuvant Chemotherapy Delivery and Survival Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Surgical complications after resection for locally advanced rectal cancer may influence adjuvant treatment outcomes and survival. Few studies have examined this effect.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the impact of surgical complications on adjuvant therapy delivery and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with long-course chemoradiation followed by surgery.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected multicenter colorectal cancer database.

SETTINGS

Data were collected from the Australian Comprehensive Cancer Outcomes and Research Database.

PATIENTS

All patients who completed neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer between January 2003 and December 2014 were selected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We examined the types and frequency of surgical complications and their impact on the delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival.

RESULTS

Data were available for 517 patients, of whom 147 (28%) had a surgical complication. Patients with a surgical complication were less likely to commence adjuvant chemotherapy (33% vs 66%; p = 0.0005) and more likely to have adjuvant treatment commencing more than 8 weeks from surgery (71.8% vs 21.2%; p = 0.004). Wound-related complications (p = 0.001), return to operating theater (p = 0.004), and readmission within 30 days (p = 0.02) had the most significant negative impact on the delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgical complications were significantly more likely in males (31.6% vs 20.8%, p = 0.003) and laparoscopic converted cases (47.8% vs 21.8%, p = 0.03). For the entire patient population, adjuvant chemotherapy compared with surveillance was not associated with an improved recurrence-free survival (HR, 1.06; p = 0.83) but was associated with an improved overall survival (HR, 0.53; p = 0.04).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective design.

CONCLUSION

Surgical complications in patients having surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer were associated with significantly reduced uptake and delays to receiving adjuvant therapy. Surgical complications, however, were not associated with either significantly reduced recurrence-free or overall survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy delivery was associated with improved overall survival.

Diagnostic performance of MRI for prediction of candidates for local excision of rectal cancer (ypT0-1N0) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of rectal MRI in predicting candidates for local excision (LE; ypT0-1N0) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in patients with rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved our retrospective study and waived informed consent. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with pathologically confirmed mid to lower rectal cancer (cT3NxM0 before neoadjuvant CRT) who underwent neoadjuvant CRT and had MRI performed at 3T before and after neoadjuvant CRT. A total of 168 patients met the study criteria between 2011 and 2012. Two observers independently assessed tumor and nodal stages on MR images obtained after neoadjuvant CRT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for identifying a candidate for LE (ypT0-1N0) were calculated. Interobserver agreement was assessed with kappa value. Predictive factors for ypT0-1N0 were evaluated by logistic regression models.

RESULTS

MRI had relatively high accuracy, specificity, and NPV (85.9%, 93.8%, and 88.9% for observer 1 and 85.3%, 96.1%, and 86.6% for observer 2), moderate PPV (71.4% and 76.2%), and relatively low sensitivity (57.1% and 45.7%) for predicting ypT0-1N0. The interobserver agreement was fair (kappa value = 0.593). Carcinoembryonic antigen levels after neoadjuvant CRT and the maximal extramural depth of tumor spread were significant predictors of ypT0-1N0 (P = 0.037 and 0.017, respectively).

CONCLUSION

MRI after neoadjuvant CRT can predict a candidate for LE (ypT0-1N0) after neoadjuvant CRT with moderate PPV and relatively high NPV. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:471-477.

Locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum presenting with necrotising fasciitis of the perineum: successful management with early aggressive surgery and multimodal therapy

Colorectal cancer is a common malignant neoplasm and its treatment usually involves surgery associated, in some cases, depending on the staging, with chemoradiotherapy. Necrotising fasciitis of the perineum is a highly lethal infection of the perineum, perirectal tissues and genitals, requiring emergency surgical debridement, broad-spectrum antibiotics and control of sepsis. We present the case of a 59-year-old man with necrotising fasciitis of the perineum as the first clinical manifestation of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum, in which successful management consisted of early and aggressive surgical debridement, followed by multimodal therapy with curative intent. 2 years and 6 months after surgery the patient is well, with no evidence of local or systemic relapse.