1
|
Rogers JE, Sirisaengtaksin A, Leung M, Morris VK, Xiao L, Huey R, Wolff R, Eng C, Vauthey JN, Tzeng CWD, Johnson B. Hepatic Metastasectomy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal: A Case Series of a Curative Approach. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3890. [PMID: 37568706 PMCID: PMC10417325 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is rare. Most cases are diagnosed in a localized setting. Metastatic SCCA is rare, and investigation has been limited in the past for these patients. We believe that hepatic-only metastatic disease could have a unique treatment landscape compared to diseases with diffuse metastatic involvement. Here, we describe cases at our institution. METHODS We reviewed eight SCCA cases with hepatic-only metastatic disease (diagnosed February 2018-January 2022). The objectives were to determine the overall survival and disease-free survival with this approach. RESULTS The median age was 62 years old (yo). Patients had an ECOG of 0-1. All patients received definitive chemoradiation to their primary anal tumor. A median of three months of neoadjuvant systemic therapy was provided. All patients had a response on their first scan after systemic therapy. Sixty-two percent received carboplatin + paclitaxel. A complete pathologic response was seen in 62% of patients. At their last follow-up, all patients were alive. Three patients had recurrent disease. The estimated 1-year disease-free survival probability was 56.2%. CONCLUSION Our report shows the feasibility of a curative-intent approach for patients with hepatic-only metastatic SCCA following the neoadjuvant application of carboplatin + paclitaxel. This approach appears promising in these select patients and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane E. Rogers
- Pharmacy Clinical Programs, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Michael Leung
- Pharmacy Clinical Programs, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Van K. Morris
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lianchun Xiao
- Department of Biostatistics, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ryan Huey
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Robert Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Cathy Eng
- Vanderbilt Department of Medical Oncology, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Jean Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D. Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Benny Johnson
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Portale G, Parotto M, Pozza A, Scarpa M, Cavallin F. Chemoradiation vs. local excision in the management of early squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:1937-1944. [PMID: 36002749 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04241-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) suffers a constant increase each year in the last decades. Recent studies suggested the possibility of local excision (LE) as an option for early-stage SCAC patients. This systematic review aims to summarize the available evidence on the comparison of LE vs. chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the treatment of early SCCA patients. METHODS We conducted a literature review including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews through June 2022. MOOSE guidelines were followed. We used the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) tool to assess quality. Data on survival and procedure-associated costs were extracted. RESULTS Four retrospective studies including 3323 patients were included. They were all comparative retrospective cohort studies (three were registry-based studies, either NCDB or SEER) with a MINORS score of 16-19 points. Overall survival (OS) was comparable between LE and CRT patients in three studies, with a 5-year OS of 85.3-100% in LE patients and 85-91.6% in CRT patients. One study investigated cancer-specific survival (CSS) and reported similar 5-year CSS in LE (98%) and CRT patients (96%). One investigated progression-free survival (PFS) and did not report any statistically significant difference in 5-year PFS between LE (91%) and CRT patients (83%). Only one study considered the mean costs associated with the two approaches (29,210 USD with LE and 46,350 USD with CRT). CONCLUSIONS LE may potentially be considered a valid alternative to CRT for patients with early-stage SCAA. Results of prospective randomized long-term trials comparing LE with CRT are warranted to draw definitive conclusions and consider LE as a true cost-effective strategy for T1N0 SCCA with similar oncologic results offered by CRT, which-to date-remains the "gold standard." PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42022338750.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Portale
- Department of General Surgery, ULSS 6 Euganea, Cittadella, Padua, Italy.
| | - Matteo Parotto
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anna Pozza
- Department of General Surgery, ULSS 2 MULLarca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Marco Scarpa
- Department of General Surgery, University of Padova Medica Sciences, Padua, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
The Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Anal Cancer and Future Strategies. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2022; 23:1073-1085. [PMID: 35666353 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-022-00939-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Despite being markedly sensitive to chemoradiotherapy, patients with locally advanced (T3-4 and/or node-positive) squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) still present high rates of disease recurrence, which is characterized by meaningful morbidity and mortality. Abdominoperineal resection as salvage surgery may be considered for patients with local recurrence, but with an important negative impact in the quality of life. Systemic therapy of advanced SCCA is an unmet clinical need. Palliative chemotherapy for the management of unresectable or metastatic disease yields approximately 60% of objective response rate; however, it still portends a grim prognosis. Based on the recently published InterAACT trial, carboplatin plus paclitaxel has become the standard of care of advanced disease; modified DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) may also be considered for fit patients amenable to intensive therapy. There are no FDA-approved therapies for the treatment of chemorefractory patients. Nevertheless, both nivolumab and pembrolizumab may be considered for these patients with promising results, regardless of PD-L1 expression or other predictive biomarkers. It is estimated that approximately 1 out of 5 patients with SCCA will derive large benefit from PD-1 inhibitors, which may produce considerable durations of response. Ongoing clinical trials exploring the combination of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line therapy, combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4, and emerging immunotherapeutic approaches, such as adoptive T cell therapies, are eagerly awaited and may bring practice-changing results in the next few years for the treatment of this challenging disease.
Collapse
|
4
|
Eng C, Ciombor KK, Cho M, Dorth JA, Rajdev LN, Horowitz DP, Gollub MJ, Jácome AA, Lockney NA, Muldoon RL, Washington MK, O'Brian BA, Benny A, Lebeck Lee CM, Benson AB, Goodman KA, Morris VK. Anal Cancer: Emerging Standards in a Rare Rare Disease. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2774-2788. [PMID: 35649196 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The social stigma surrounding an anal cancer diagnosis has traditionally prevented open discussions about this disease. However, as recent treatment options and an increasing rate of diagnoses are made worldwide, awareness is growing. In the United States alone, 9,090 individuals were expected to be diagnosed with anal cancer in 2021. The US annual incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus continues to increase by 2.7% yearly, whereas the mortality rate increases by 3.1%. The main risk factor for anal cancer is a human papillomavirus infection; those with chronic immunosuppression are also at risk. Patients with HIV are 19 times more likely to develop anal cancer compared with the general population. In this review, we have provided an overview of the carcinoma of the anal canal, the role of screening, advancements in radiation therapy, and current trials investigating acute and chronic treatment-related toxicities. This article is a comprehensive approach to presenting the existing data in an effort to encourage continuous international interest in anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Eng
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Kristen K Ciombor
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - May Cho
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California- Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA
| | - Jennifer A Dorth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Lakshmi N Rajdev
- Division for Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwell Health/Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| | - David P Horowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alexandre A Jácome
- OncoBio Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Nova Lima, Brazil
| | - Natalie A Lockney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Roberta L Muldoon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Mary Kay Washington
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Brittany A O'Brian
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Amala Benny
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Cody M Lebeck Lee
- VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Department of Internal Medicine, Nashville, TN
| | - Al B Benson
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Van Karlyle Morris
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tang J, Zhu L, Huang Y, Yang L, Ge D, Hu Z, Wang C. Development and Validation of Prognostic Survival Nomograms for Patients with Anal Canal Cancer: A SEER-Based Study. Int J Gen Med 2022; 14:10065-10081. [PMID: 34984027 PMCID: PMC8709559 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s346381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Anal canal cancer is a rare malignancy with increasing incidence in recent times. This study aimed to develop two nomograms to predict the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with anal canal cancer. Methods Information of patients with anal canal cancer from 2004 to 2015 was extracted from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database. Cox analysis was used to select the risk factors for prognosis, and nomograms were constructed using the R software. The C-index, area under the curve (AUC) of time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plot and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the clinical utility of the nomograms. Results A total of 2458 patients with malignant tumours of the anal canal were screened out. Sex, age, marital status, histological type, grade, tumour size, AJCC stage, SEER stage and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS, whereas sex, age, race, histological type, grade, tumour size, AJCC stage, SEER stage and radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors for CSS. In the training cohort, the C-index value for OS nomogram was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69-0.77), and the AUC values that predicted the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 0.764, 0.758 and 0.760, respectively, whereas the C-index value for CSS nomogram model was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.69-0.79), and the AUC values were 0.763, 0.769 and 0.763, respectively. The calibration plot and DCA curves demonstrated good prediction performance of the model in both the training and validation cohorts. Conclusion The established nomogram is a visualisation tool that can effectively predict the OS and CSS of patients with anal canal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Tang
- Department of Oncology, Liyang People's Hospital, Liyang, 213300, People's Republic of China
| | - Liqun Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Liyang People's Hospital, Liyang, 213300, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuejiao Huang
- Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong, 226019, People's Republic of China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226399, People's Republic of China
| | - Lixiang Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, People's Republic of China
| | - Dangen Ge
- Department of Pharmacy, Liyang People's Hospital, Liyang, 213300, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhengyu Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Affiliated to Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China
| | - Chun Wang
- Department of Oncology, Liyang People's Hospital, Liyang, 213300, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|