Comparison of the Parkinson's KinetiGraph to off/on levodopa response testing: Single center experience

Instrumented timed up and go test and machine learning-based levodopa response evaluation: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The acute levodopa challenge test (ALCT) is a universal method for evaluating levodopa response (LR). Assessment of Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS III) is a key step in ALCT, which is some extent subjective and inconvenience.

METHODS

This study developed a machine learning method based on instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) test to evaluate the patients' response to levodopa and compared it with classic ALCT. Forty-two patients with parkinsonism were recruited and administered with levodopa. MDS-UPDRS III and the iTUG were conducted in both OFF-and ON-medication state. Kinematic parameters, signal time and frequency domain features were extracted from sensor data. Two XGBoost models, levodopa response regression (LRR) model and motor symptom evaluation (MSE) model, were trained to predict the levodopa response (LR) of the patients using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation.

RESULTS

The LR predicted by the LRR model agreed with that calculated by the classic ALCT (ICC = 0.95). When the LRR model was used to detect patients with a positive LR, the positive predictive value was 0.94.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning based on wearable sensor data and the iTUG test may be effective and comprehensive for evaluating LR and predicting the benefit of dopaminergic therapy.

Devices for remote continuous monitoring of people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

Background

Parkinson's disease is a brain condition causing a progressive loss of co ordination and movement problems. Around 145,500 people have Parkinson's disease in the United Kingdom. Levodopa is the most prescribed treatment for managing motor symptoms in the early stages. Patients should be monitored by a specialist every 6-12 months for disease progression and treatment of adverse effects. Wearable devices may provide a novel approach to management by directly monitoring patients for bradykinesia, dyskinesia, tremor and other symptoms. They are intended to be used alongside clinical judgement.

Objectives

To determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of five devices for monitoring Parkinson's disease: Personal KinetiGraph, Kinesia 360, KinesiaU, PDMonitor and STAT-ON.

Methods

We performed systematic reviews of all evidence on the five devices, outcomes included: diagnostic accuracy, impact on decision-making, clinical outcomes, patient and clinician opinions and economic outcomes. We searched MEDLINE and 12 other databases/trial registries to February 2022. Risk of bias was assessed. Narrative synthesis was used to summarise all identified evidence, as the evidence was insufficient for meta-analysis. One included trial provided individual-level data, which was re-analysed. A de novo decision-analytic model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of Personal KinetiGraph and Kinesia 360 compared to standard of care in the UK NHS over a 5-year time horizon. The base-case analysis considered two alternative monitoring strategies: one-time use and routine use of the device.

Results

Fifty-seven studies of Personal KinetiGraph, 15 of STAT-ON, 3 of Kinesia 360, 1 of KinesiaU and 1 of PDMonitor were included. There was some evidence to suggest that Personal KinetiGraph can accurately measure bradykinesia and dyskinesia, leading to treatment modification in some patients, and a possible improvement in clinical outcomes when measured using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. The evidence for STAT-ON suggested it may be of value for diagnosing symptoms, but there is currently no evidence on its clinical impact. The evidence for Kinesia 360, KinesiaU and PDMonitor is insufficient to draw any conclusions on their value in clinical practice. The base-case results for Personal KinetiGraph compared to standard of care for one-time and routine use resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £67,856 and £57,877 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively, with a beneficial impact of the Personal KinetiGraph on Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale domains III and IV. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio results for Kinesia 360 compared to standard of care for one-time and routine use were £38,828 and £67,203 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively.

Limitations

The evidence was limited in extent and often low quality. For all devices, except Personal KinetiGraph, there was little to no evidence on the clinical impact of the technology.

Conclusions

Personal KinetiGraph could reasonably be used in practice to monitor patient symptoms and modify treatment where required. There is too little evidence on STAT-ON, Kinesia 360, KinesiaU or PDMonitor to be confident that they are clinically useful. The cost-effectiveness of remote monitoring appears to be largely unfavourable with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in excess of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year across a range of alternative assumptions. The main driver of cost-effectiveness was the durability of improvements in patient symptoms.

Study registration

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42022308597.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135437) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 30. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Improving naturalistic neuroscience with patient engagement strategies

Introduction

The clinical implementation of chronic electrophysiology-driven adaptive deep brain stimulation (DBS) algorithms in movement disorders requires reliable representation of motor and non-motor symptoms in electrophysiological biomarkers, throughout normal life (naturalistic). To achieve this, there is the need for high-resolution and -quality chronic objective and subjective symptom monitoring in parallel to biomarker recordings. To realize these recordings, an active participation and engagement of the investigated patients is necessary. To date, there has been little research into patient engagement strategies for DBS patients or chronic electrophysiological recordings.

Concepts and results

We here present our concept and the first results of a patient engagement strategy for a chronic DBS study. After discussing the current state of literature, we present objectives, methodology and consequences of the patient engagement regarding study design, data acquisition, and study infrastructure. Nine patients with Parkinson's disease and their caregivers participated in the meeting, and their input led to changes to our study design. Especially, the patient input helped us designing study-set-up meetings and support structures.

Conclusion

We believe that patient engagement increases compliance and study motivation through scientific empowerment of patients. While considering patient opinion on sensors or questionnaire questions may lead to more precise and reliable data acquisition, there was also a high demand for study support and engagement structures. Hence, we recommend the implementation of patient engagement in planning of chronic studies with complex designs, long recording durations or high demand for individual active study participation.

Overview on wearable sensors for the management of Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is affecting about 1.2 million patients in Europe with a prevalence that is expected to have an exponential increment, in the next decades. This epidemiological evolution will be challenged by the low number of neurologists able to deliver expert care for PD. As PD is better recognized, there is an increasing demand from patients for rigorous control of their symptoms and for therapeutic education. In addition, the highly variable nature of symtoms between patients and the fluctuations within the same patient requires innovative tools to help doctors and patients monitor the disease in their usual living environment and adapt treatment in a more relevant way. Nowadays, there are various body-worn sensors (BWS) proposed to monitor parkinsonian clinical features, such as motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, tremor, bradykinesia, freezing of gait (FoG) or gait disturbances. BWS have been used as add-on tool for patients' management or research purpose. Here, we propose a practical anthology, summarizing the characteristics of the most used BWS for PD patients in Europe, focusing on their role as tools to improve treatment management. Consideration regarding the use of technology to monitor non-motor features is also included. BWS obviously offer new opportunities for improving management strategy in PD but their precise scope of use in daily routine care should be clarified.

Identification and quantitative assessment of motor complications in Parkinson's disease using the Parkinson's KinetiGraph™

Introduction

Effective management and therapies for the motor complications of Parkinson's disease (PD) require appropriate clinical evaluation. The Parkinson's KinetiGraph™ (PKG) is a wearable biosensor system that can record the motion characteristics of PD objectively and remotely.

Objective

The study aims to investigate the value of PKG in identifying and quantitatively assessing motor complications including motor fluctuations and dyskinesia in the Chinese PD population, as well as the correlation with the clinical scale assessments.

Methods

Eighty-four subjects with PD were recruited and continuously wore the PKG for 7 days. Reports with 7-day output data were provided by the manufacturer, including the fluctuation scores (FS) and dyskinesia scores (DKS). Specialists in movement disorders used the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-IV (MDS-UPDRS IV), the wearing-off questionnaire 9 (WOQ-9), and the unified dyskinesia rating scale (UDysRS) for the clinical assessment of motor complications. Spearman correlation analyses were used to evaluate the correlation between the FS and DKS recorded by the PKG and the clinical scale assessment results. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of the FS and DKS scores in the identification of PD motor complications.

Results

The FS was significantly positively correlated with the MDS-UPDRS IV motor fluctuation (items 4.3-4.5) scores (r = 0.645, p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed a maximum FS cut-off value of 7.5 to identify motor fluctuation, with a sensitivity of 74.3% and specificity of 87.8%. The DKS was significantly positively correlated with the UDysRS total score (r = 0.629, p < 0.001) and the UDysRS III score (r = 0.634, p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that the maximum DKS cut-off value for the diagnosis of dyskinesia was 0.7, with a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 83.3%.

Conclusion

The PKG assessment of motor complications in the PD population analyzed in this study has a significant correlation with the clinical scale assessment, high sensitivity, and high specificity. Compared with clinical evaluations, PKG can objectively, quantitatively, and remotely identify and assess motor complications in PD, providing a good objective recording for managing motor complications.