Pitfalls in MRI of rectal cancer: What radiologists need to know and avoid

Imaging and Metabolic Diagnostic Methods in the Stage Assessment of Rectal Cancer

Rectal cancer (RC) is a prevalent malignancy with significant morbidity and mortality rates. The accurate staging of RC is crucial for optimal treatment planning and patient outcomes. This review aims to summarize the current literature on imaging and metabolic diagnostic methods used in the stage assessment of RC. Various imaging modalities play a pivotal role in the initial evaluation and staging of RC. These include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and endorectal ultrasound (ERUS). MRI has emerged as the gold standard for local staging due to its superior soft tissue resolution and ability to assess tumor invasion depth, lymph node involvement, and the presence of extramural vascular invasion. CT imaging provides valuable information about distant metastases and helps determine the feasibility of surgical resection. ERUS aids in assessing tumor depth, perirectal lymph nodes, and sphincter involvement. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each diagnostic modality is essential for accurate staging and treatment decisions in RC. Furthermore, the integration of multiple imaging and metabolic methods, such as PET/CT or PET/MRI, can enhance diagnostic accuracy and provide valuable prognostic information. Thus, a literature review was conducted to investigate and assess the effectiveness and accuracy of diagnostic methods, both imaging and metabolic, in the stage assessment of RC.

Results of a diagnostic imaging audit in a randomised clinical trial in rectal cancer highlight the importance of careful planning and quality control

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the modality used for baseline assessment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and restaging after neoadjuvant treatment. The overall audited quality of MR imaging in large multicentre trials on rectal cancer is so far not routinely reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected MR images obtained within the Rectal Cancer And Pre-operative Induction Therapy Followed by Dedicated Operation (RAPIDO) trial and performed an audit of the technical features of image acquisition. The required MR sequences and slice thickness stated in the RAPIDO protocol were used as a reference.

RESULTS

Out of 920 participants of the RAPIDO study, MR investigations of 668 and 623 patients in the baseline and restaging setting, respectively, were collected. Of these, 304/668 (45.5%) and 328/623 (52.6%) MR images, respectively, fulfilled the technical quality criteria. The main reason for non-compliance was exceeding slice thickness 238/668, 35.6% in the baseline setting and 162/623, 26.0% in the restaging setting. In 166/668, 24.9% and 168/623, 27.0% MR images in the baseline and restaging setting, respectively, one or more of the required pulse sequences were missing.

CONCLUSION

Altogether, 49.0% of the MR images obtained within the RAPIDO trial fulfilled the image acquisition criteria required in the study protocol. High-quality MR imaging should be expected for the appropriate initial treatment and response evaluation of patients with LARC, and efforts should be made to maximise the quality of imaging in clinical trials and in clinical practice.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This audit highlights the importance of adherence to MR image acquisition criteria for rectal cancer, both in multicentre trials and in daily clinical practice. High-resolution images allow correct staging, treatment stratification and evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment.

KEY POINTS

- Complying to MR acquisition guidelines in multicentre trials is challenging. - Neglection on MR acquisition criteria leads to poor staging and treatment. - MR acquisition guidelines should be followed in trials and clinical practice. - Researchers should consider mandatory audits prior to study initiation.

Novel multiparametric MRI-based radiomics in preoperative prediction of perirectal fat invasion in rectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of a nomogram that combines clinical and radiomic features of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative perirectal fat invasion (PFI) prediction in rectal cancer.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. A total of 363 patients from two centers were included in the study. Patients in the first center were randomly divided into training cohort (n = 212) and internal validation cohort (n = 91) at the ratio of 7:3. Patients in the second center were allocated to the external validation cohort (n = 60). Among the training cohort, the numbers of patients who were PFI positive and PFI negative were 108 and 104, respectively. The radiomics features of preoperative T₂-weighted images, diffusion-weighted images and enhanced T₁-weighted images were extracted, and the total Radscore of each patient was obtained. We created Clinic model and Radscore model, respectively, according to clinical data or Radscore only. And that, we assembled the combined model using the clinical data and Radscore. We used DeLong's test, receiver operating characteristic, calibration and decision curve analysis to assess the models' performance.

RESULTS

The three models had good performance. Clinic model and Radscore model showed equivalent performance with AUCs of 0.85, 0.82 (accuracy of 81%, 81%) in the training cohort, AUCs of 0.78, 0.86 (accuracy of 74%, 84%) in the internal cohort, and 0.84, 0.84 (accuracy of 80%, 82%) in the external cohort without statistical difference (DeLong's test, p > 0.05). AUCs and accuracy of Combined model were 0.89 and 87%, 0.90 and 88%, and 0.90 and 88% in the three cohorts, respectively, which were higher than that of Clinic model and Radscore model, but only in the training cohort with a statistical difference (DeLong's test, p < 0.05). The calibration curves of the nomogram exhibited acceptable consistency, and the decision curve analysis indicated higher net benefit in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

A nomogram combining clinical and radiomic features of MRI to compute the probability of PFI in rectal cancer was developed and validated. It has the potential to serve as a preoperative biomarker for predicting pathological PFI of rectal cancer.

Intra- and interobserver agreement of rectal cancer staging with MRI

Background

Reliable preoperative staging of rectal cancers is crucial for treatment decision making.

Purpose

To assess the intra- and inter-observer agreement of rectal cancer staging, including the sub-categories, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Material and Methods

The study includes 85 patients (35.3% women; mean age = 62.2 ± 11.2 years) who underwent MRI for rectal cancer staging between August 2020 and April 2021. All the stored images were evaluated independently by two radiologists with 10–15 years of experience. For intra-observer agreement, the evaluations were done two months apart. Analyses were made using kappa, prevalence and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), where appropriate.

Results

There was a substantial inter-observer agreement for tumor localization (kappa = 0.665, PABAK = 0.682), mesorectal fascia invasion (kappa = 0.663, PABAK = 0.822), internal and external sphincter involvement (kappa 0.804 and 0.751, PABAK 0.859 and 0.929, respectively), and moderate to substantial agreement for M-staging (kappa = 0.451, PABAK = 0.742) and extramural vascular invasion (kappa = 0.569, PABAK = 0.741). There was also a good inter-observer agreement for T staging and N staging (ICC = 0.862, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.788–0.911; and ICC = 0.841, 95% CI = 0.595–0.922, respectively). As expected, intra-observer agreement was better than inter-observer agreement.

Conclusion

Intra- and inter-observer agreement for MRI staging of rectal cancers using the structured reporting template is good.

Development and validation of a high-resolution T2WI-based radiomic signature for the diagnosis of lymph node status within the mesorectum in rectal cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of a high-resolution T2-weighted imaging (HR-T2WI)-based radiomics prediction model for diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) within the mesorectum in rectal cancer.

Method

A total of 604 LNs (306 metastatic and 298 non-metastatic) from 166 patients were obtained. All patients underwent HR-T2WI examination and total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery. Four kinds of segmentation methods were used to select region of interest (ROI), including method 1 along the border of LNs; method 2 along the expanded border of LNs with an additional 2–3 mm; method 3 covering the border of LNs only; and method 4, a circle region only within LNs. A total of 1,409 features were extracted for each method. Variance threshold method, Select K Best, and Lasso algorithm were used to reduce the dimension. All LNs were divided into training and test sets. Fivefold cross-validation was used to build the logistic model, which was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) with four indicators, including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), and specificity (SP). Three radiologists with different working experience in diagnosing rectal diseases assessed LN metastasis respectively. The diagnostic efficiencies with each of four segmentation methods and three radiologists were compared to each other.

Results

For the test set, the AUCs of four segmentation methods were 0.820, 0.799, 0.764, and 0.741; the ACCs were 0.725, 0.704, 0.709, and 0.670; the SEs were 0.756, 0.634, 0.700, and 0.589; and the SPs were 0.696, 0.772, 0.717, and 0.750, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in AUC between the four methods (p > 0.05). Method 1 had the highest values of AUC, ACC, and SE. For three radiologists, the overall diagnostic efficiency was moderate. The corresponding AUCs were 0.604, 0.634, and 0.671; the ACCs were 0.601, 0.632, and 0.667; the SEs were 0.366, 0.552, and 0.392; and the SPs were 0.842, 0.715, and 0.950, respectively.

Conclusions

The proposed HR-T2WI-based radiomic signature exhibited a robust performance on predicting mesorectal LN status and could potentially be used for clinicians in order to determine the status of metastatic LNs in rectal cancer patients.

Multi-parameter diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging and radiomics nomogram for preoperative evaluation of aquaporin-1 expression in rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The overexpression of aquaporin-1 (AQP1) is associated with poor prognosis in rectal cancer. This study aimed to explore the value of multi-parameter diffusion and perfusion MRI and radiomics models in predicting AQP1 high expression.

METHODS

This prospective study was performed from July 2019 to February 2021, which included rectal cancer participants after preoperative rectal MRI, with diffusion-weighted imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequences. Radiomic features were extracted from MR images, and immunohistochemical tests assessed AQP1 expression. Selected quantitative MRI and radiomic features were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves evaluated the predictive performance. The nomogram performance was evaluated by its calibration, discrimen, and clinical utility. The intraclass correlation coefficient evaluated the interobserver agreement for the MRI features.

RESULTS

110 participants with the age of 60.7 ± 12.5 years been enrolled in this study. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), IVIM_D, DKI_diffusivity, and DCE_Ktrans were significantly higher in participants with high AQP1 expression than in those with low expression (P < 0.05). ADC (b = 1000, 2000, and 3000 s/mm²), IVIM_D, DKI_diffusivity, and DCE_Ktrans were positively correlated (r = 0.205, 0.275, 0.37, 0.235, 0.229, and 0.227, respectively; P < 0.05), whereas DKI_Kurtosis was negatively correlated (r = - 0.22, P = 0.021) with AQP1 expression. ADC (b = 3000 s/mm²), IVIM_D, DKI_ diffusivity, DKI_Kurtosis, and DCE_Ktrans had moderate diagnostic efficiencies for high AQP1 expression (AUC = 0.715, 0.636, 0.627, 0.633, and 0.632, respectively; P < 0.05). The radiomic features had excellent predictive efficiency for high AQP1 expression (AUC = 0.967 and 0.917 for training and validation). The model-based nomogram had C-indexes of 0.932 and 0.851 for the training and validation cohorts, which indicated good fitting to the calibration curves (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Diffusion and perfusion MRI can indicate the aquaporin-1 expression in rectal cancer, and radiomic features can enhance the predictive efficiency for high AQP1 expression. A nomogram for high aquaporin-1 expression will improve clinical decision-making.

Improving the completeness of structured MRI reports for rectal cancer staging

PURPOSE

Assess the impact of a multifaceted intervention to improve the completeness of structured MRI reports for patients undergoing initial staging for rectal cancer.

METHODS

This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study was performed at a large academic hospital. MRI reports for initial staging of rectal cancer in 2017 and 2019 were analyzed pre- and post-implementation of multiple quality improvement interventions in 2018, including harmonizing MRI protocols across the institution, educational conferences and modules, and requiring second opinion consultation for all MRI rectal cancer examinations. The primary outcome measure was the completeness of rectal cancer staging MRI reports, classified as optimal, satisfactory, or unsatisfactory based on the inclusion of 15 quality measures pre-defined by a consensus of abdominal and cancer imaging subspecialists, colorectal surgeons, and radiation oncologists at our institution, based on published recommendations. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate changes in report quality and documentation of each quality measure.

RESULTS

The study included 138 MRI reports, of which 72 (52%) were completed in 2017 pre-intervention. Post intervention, the proportion of optimal reports increased significantly from 52.8% (38/72) to 71.2% (47/66) (p = 0.035). Documentation of 1 quality measure (N stage) increased post intervention from 91.7% (66/72) to 100% (66/66) (p = 0.029). Documentation of 7 quality measures was 100% post intervention, with a documentation rate of > 95% for all quality measures except radial location of tumor.

CONCLUSION

A combination of educational and system-wide interventions was associated with an improvement in the completeness of structured MRI reports for rectal cancer staging.

Endorectal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Rectal Cancer Staging: A Modern Multimodality Approach

Preoperative staging represents a crucial point for the management, type of surgery, and candidacy for neoadjuvant therapy in patient with rectal cancer. The most recent clinical guidelines in oncology recommend an accurate preoperative evaluation in order to address early and advanced tumors to different therapeutic options. In particular, potential pitfalls may occur in the assessment of T3 tumors, which represents the most common stage at diagnosis. The depth of tumor invasion is known to be an important prognostic factor in rectal carcinoma; as a consequence, the T3 imaging classification has a substantial importance for treatment strategy and patient survival. However, the differentiation between tumor invasion of perirectal fat and mesorectal desmoplastic reactions remains a main goal for radiologists. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is actually considered as the best imaging modality for rectal cancer staging. Although the endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is the preferred staging method for early tumors, it could also be useful in identifying perirectal fat invasion. Moreover, the addiction of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) improves the diagnostic performance of MRI in rectal cancer staging by adding functional information about rectal tumor and adjacent mesorectal tissues. This study investigated the diagnostic performance of conventional MRI alone, in combination with the DWI technique and ERUS in order to assess the best diagnostic imaging combination for rectal cancer staging.

Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for cT3N0 rectal cancer: any benefit over upfront surgery? A propensity score-matched study

PURPOSE

Benefits of neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) are well known for locally advanced and/or node-positive rectal cancer, but the best timing for CRT has been less explored for cT3N0 patients. The aim of the present study was to compare the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) probability between neoadjuvant CRT and upfront surgery in patients affected by cT3N0 rectal cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 105 patients affected by cT3N0 rectal cancer, staged by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and treated at the National Cancer Institute of Milan between 2011 and 2017, was performed: 42 (40.0%) were treated by neoadjuvant CRT and 63 (60.0%) by upfront surgery. Propensity score matching was performed to avoid selection bias, and Cox multivariate regression was used to analyze outcomes.

RESULTS

The 5-year DFS probability was 87.5% in neoadjuvant CRT patients vs. 90.0% in upfront surgery cases (Log-rank p = 0.76). The 5-year loco-regional recurrence-free survival probability was respectively 96.8% vs. 96.3% (Log-rank p = 0.954). On multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant CRT had no impact on DFS when compared to upfront surgery (adjusted HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.18-2.70, p = 0.613), but 61.9% of upfront surgery cases were treated by adjuvant chemo-radiation (adjusted HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.11-1.57, p = 0.196). The only independent predictor of improved DFS was age at diagnosis (adjusted HR 0.95, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

CRT should be considered for cT3N0 patients, but its timing (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant) seems not to affect the disease-free survival in the present cohort of patients.