Neurophysiological approach in the peripheral anesthetic blocks as a diagnosis and prognosis tool for spasticity

French clinical guidelines for peripheral motor nerve blocks in a PRM setting

INTRODUCTION

Motor nerve blocks with anesthetic drug for local anesthesia are commonly used in physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM), especially in the field of spasticity. Guidelines in this context are currently lacking.

METHOD

Eighteen experts selected on the basis of their recognized experience by the scientific committees of the French PRM (SOFMER) and Anesthesia and Intensive care (SFAR) societies were invited to work and propose guidelines for the use of loco-regional anesthetic drug for motor nerve blocks in PRM setting. Eight issues were addressed: which neural blocks for which indications; drugs and contraindications; medical survey and attitude in case of adverse event; injection and guidance material; patient preparation and pain relief; efficacy assessment; patient information; education of PRM physiatrists. The Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases for the period 1999 to 2018 were consulted and 355 papers analyzed. The drafts were commented then approved by the whole group using electronic vote, before final approval by scientific committee of each society.

RESULTS

No scientific evidence emerged from the literature. Thus, these guidelines are mainly based on the opinion of the expert panel. Guidelines for each issue are reported with the main points of arguments. The main question deals with the recommendation about doses for each drug: for lidocaine - up to 2mg/kg - "check contraindications, emergency truck available, no need of previous anesthetic consultation nor presence of anesthetic physician"; for ropivacaine - up to 1.5mg/kg, with a maximum of 100mg - the same but after intravenous line. Beyond these doses, SFAR guidelines have to be applied with the need of anesthetic physician.

CONCLUSION

These are the first organizational guidelines devoted to increase the security of motor nerve block use in PRM settings.

Surgical Management of Spasticity of the Thumb and Fingers

Spasticity of the hand profoundly limits an individual's independent ability to accomplish self-care and activities of daily living. Surgical procedures should be tailored to patients' needs and functional ability, and even patients with severe cognitive injuries and poor upper extremity function may benefit from surgery to improve appearance and hygiene. Careful preoperative examination and planning are needed, and consideration is given to the potential unintended detrimental effect of a surgical procedure on hand function.

The value of nerve blocks in the diagnoses and treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: a series of 14 cases

OBJECTIVES

Complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS-1) can progress to joint stiffness, which may be related to pain and/or capsule-ligament contracture. In this context, it is difficult to distinguish the respective causative roles of pain and contractures. Nerve blocks (NBs) can be used to determine the aetiology of joint stiffness. Subsequent treatment will depend on whether contractures are present or not. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic value of the nerve blocks in the management of joint stiffness caused by CRPS-1.

DESIGN OF THE STUDY

A retrospective case series.

METHODS

Implementation of NBs in subjects with joint stiffness caused by CRPS-1. Primary efficacy criterion: an increase in the range of joint movement. Secondary criteria: pain level, treatment decision, duration of therapeutic NBs, return to work.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with joint stiffness underwent 17 NBs. Ten NBs (59%) were associated with the normalization of the range of joint movement (i.e. the absence of contractures and the presence of an isolated pain component), prompting the implementation of physical therapy during NBs ("therapeutic NBs") in 90% of these cases. Three NBs (18%) were associated with a partial increase in the range of joint movement (i.e. a background of joint stiffness due to a combination of pain and contracture), prompting the implementation of a therapeutic NB in all of these cases. Four NBs (23%) were not associated with any increase in the range of joint movement (i.e. pure contractures), prompting consultation with a surgeon in all of these cases. Forty-three percent of the patients have since returned to work.

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve block is a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic option in the management of joint stiffness caused by CRPS-1.

Flexor origin slide for contracture of spastic finger flexor muscles: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Contracture of the wrist and extrinsic finger flexor and pronator muscles is a common consequence of central nervous system disorders. The proximal release of the extrinsic flexor and pronator muscles was first described by Page and Scaglietti for a Volkmann contracture. The aim of the present study was to assess the amount of increase in extension and the improvements in global hand function that can be expected following this lengthening procedure in patients with central nervous system disorders.

METHOD

A single-center retrospective review of patients with central nervous system lesions and contractures of the wrist and extrinsic finger flexor and forearm pronator muscles, causing aesthetic, hygienic, or functional impairment, was carried out. The Page-Scaglietti technique was used for all interventions. Before the operation, motor nerve blocks were used to distinguish between spasticity and contractures with surgical intervention only for contractures. The Zancolli and House classifications were used to evaluate improvements.

RESULTS

Data from fifty-four hands and fifty patients (thirty-five men and fifteen women) were evaluated. The mean duration of follow-up (and standard deviation) was 26 ± 21 months (range, three to 124 months). The mean gain (and standard deviation) in wrist extension with fingers extended was 67° ± 25° (range, -10° to 110°). Preoperatively, no hands were classified as Zancolli Group 1, whereas twenty-five hands were classified as Zancolli Group 1 at the latest follow-up review. Ten nonfunctional hands (rated as House Group 0 or Group 1) became functional as a supporting hand postoperatively. Zancolli and House classifications increased significantly (p < 0.01) postoperatively. In twelve cases, a partial recurrence of the deformity occurred. In seven of these cases, surgery unmasked spasticity or contracture of the intrinsic muscles, which required further intervention.

CONCLUSION

The Page-Scaglietti technique appears to improve range of motion and function in people with wrist and finger contractures due to central nervous system disorders.

[Peripheral nerve blocks and spasticity. Why and how should we use regional blocks?]

Muscle spasticity causes pain, disability, and difficulties in the rehabilitation of patients with cerebrovascular lesions, head, brain or spine trauma, coma, or neurologic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or cerebral palsy. Regional blocks have a threefold use in patients with painful spasticity: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic. Blocks are feasible on an outpatient or day-hospital basis. Blocks are applied most often to 4 peripheral sites: the pectoral nerve loop, median, obturator, and tibial nerves. The main indication is debilitating or painful spasticity. Peripheral blocks with local anesthetics are used as tests, to mimic the effects of motor blocks and determine their potential adverse effects, transiently and reversibly. Peripheral neurolytic blocks are easy to perform, effective, and inexpensive.

Lidocaine hyperselective motor blocks of the triceps surae nerves: role of the soleus versus gastrocnemius on triceps spasticity and predictive value of the soleus motor block on the result of selective tibial neurotomy

OBJECTIVES

This prospective study was designed to evaluate the clinical and gait parameter changes induced by two types of hyperselective motor blocks of the triceps surae nerves (superior soleus and gastrocnemius nerves) and their ability to predict the results of selective tibial neurotomy.

DESIGN

Seven adult patients (four males and three females, mean age of 41 yrs old) with spastic foot were included in this study. Clinical (equinus foot score, ankle range of motion, spasticity, pain, and comfort wearing shoes), and gait analysis (kinematic and electromyographic parameters) assessment were performed before and after each motor block (superior soleus nerve and gastrocnemius nerve) and 1 mo after selective tibial neurotomy.

RESULTS

The superior soleus nerve block was effective on clinical parameters (triceps surae stretch reflex scores decreased from 2.57 to 0.9, and mean walking time decreased from 44 to 32.1 secs) and on kinematics parameters (the total duration of the gait cycle was decreased because of a reduction of the R3 and swing phases). The same results are observed after soleus neurotomy.

CONCLUSION

This work confirms the practical value of selective superior soleus nerve motor block and that this block provides a useful prediction of the effect of selective soleus neurotomy. It constitutes an additional argument in favor of the predominant role of the soleus in spastic foot.

Spasticité : intérêt du testing par anesthésie locorégionale et blocs thérapeutiques

Peripheral nerve blockade is one of the therapeutic possibilities to treat spasticity of various muscles. Percutaneous nerve stimulation allows accurate location of nerves and neurolysis can be performed using intraneural injection of 65% ethanol or 5 to 12% phenol. Spastic contraction of various muscle groups is a common source of pain and disability which prevents from having efficient rehabilitation. Test-blocks as well as neurolytic blocks are possible in most of motor nerves of the upper and lower limbs and main indications are spastic sequelae of stroke and spinal trauma but also of multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy and chronic coma. The use of percutaneous nerve stimulation allows accurate location and four nerves are more frequently treated: pectoral nerve loop, median, obturator and tibial nerves. In patients with spasticity of the adductor thigh muscles, nerve blocks are performed via a combined approach using fluoroscopy and nerve stimulation to identify the obturator nerve. No complications occurred and minor side effects are transient painful phenomena during injection. These approaches proved to be accurate, fast, simple, highly successful and reproducible. Percutaneous neurolytic procedures should be done as early as possible, as soon as spasticity becomes painful and disabling in patients with neurological sequelae of stroke, head trauma or any lesion of the motor neuron.