Vanishing bile duct syndrome after drug-induced liver injury

Antibiotic-associated vanishing bile duct syndrome: a real-world retrospective and pharmacovigilance database analysis

PURPOSE

Vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS) is a rare, but potentially fatal adverse reaction triggered by certain medications. Few real-world studies have shown association between antibiotics and VBDS. We sought to quantify the risk and evaluate the clinical features of VBDS associated with antibiotics.

METHODS

Data from 2004 to 2022 on VBDS events induced by antibiotics were retrieved from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and disproportionality analyses were conducted. Furthermore, case reports from 2000 to 31 December 2022 on antibiotics-induced VBDS were retrieved for retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

We collected 132 VBDS reports from the FAERS database. Fluoroquinolones had the greatest proportion and highest positive signal values of VBDS. The RORs (95% CIs) for antibiotics were fluoroquinolones 23.68 (18.12-30.95), macrolides 19.37 (13.58-27.62), carbapenems 17.39 (7.77-38.96), beta-lactam 13.28 (9.69-18.20), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 9.05 (5.57-14.7), and tetracycline 4.02 (1.50-10.77). Twenty-three cases from 22 studies showed evidence of VBDS, beta-lactam (52.2%) was the most frequently reported agent. The median age was 45 years, the typical initial symptoms included rash (30.4%), fatigue/asthenia (26.1%), dark urine (21.7%) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) (21.7%). The median time to onset of VBDS was 2 weeks. All cases had abnormal liver function test, and the median level of total bilirubin was 23.6 mg/dl (range 3.2-80 mg/dl). Cessation of culprit drugs and treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (83.3%) were not associated with improved outcomes (57.1%).

CONCLUSION

This study identified thirteen antibacterial agents with significant reporting associations with VBDS. Fluoroquinolones may be a neglected agent of inducing VBDS.

Successful Treatment with Steroids in a Patient with Vanishing Bile Duct Syndrome and Acute Tubular Necrosis

Vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS) is a rare but potentially serious cholestatic liver disease caused by various etiologies, including drugs. We herein report a complicated case of VBDS with acute tubular necrosis (ATN) that improved significantly with steroid treatment. An Asian man in his 30s was admitted with the acute onset of severe jaundice and a decline in the renal function. Although initial treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid did not reduce jaundice or renal dysfunction, steroid treatment remarkably improved the VBDS and ATN to within the respective normal ranges. Steroid treatment can be considered in cases of VBDS that appear to have an immune-mediated cause.

Histopathological Features Predicting Long-term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Vanishing Bile Duct Syndrome

Background and Aims

The clinicopathological features and long-term outcomes of patients with vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS) have yet to be elucidated. The study aims to investigate these features and identify factors associated with poor prognosis.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study recruited patients with liver biopsy-proven VBDS who were followed up at five hospitals in northern China from January 2003 to April 2022. Clinical and pathological data at time of biopsy were reviewed. Clinical outcomes including cirrhosis, decompensation events, liver transplantation (LT), and liver-related death were recorded. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors associated with poor outcomes.

Results

A total of 183 patients were included. The median age was 47 years, with 77.6% being women. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years, 88 patients developed compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, 27 died, and 15 received LT. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that hepatocellular cholestasis (HR 2.953, 95% CI: 1.437-6.069), foam cells (HR 2.349, 95% CI: 1.092-5.053), and advanced fibrosis (HR 2.524, 95% CI: 1.313-4.851) were independent predictors of LT or liver-related deaths. A nomogram formulated with the above factors showed good consistency with a concordance index of 0.746 (95% CI: 0.706-0.785).

Conclusions

Nearly half of VBDS patients studied progressed to end-stage liver disease and 23% of them had LT or liver-related death within two years of diagnosis. Hepatocellular cholestasis, foam cells and advanced fibrosis rather than the degree of bile duct loss or underlying etiologies were independently associated with poor prognosis in VBDS patients.

Translational Relevance of Rodent Models to Predict Human Liver Disease

Animals models are essential to understand the complex pathobiology of human diseases. George Box's aphorism based on statistics "All models are wrong, but some are useful" certainly applies to animal models of disease. In this session, the translational relevance of various animal models applicable to human liver disease was explored starting with a historic overview of the rodent cancer bioassay with emphasis on hepatocarcinogenesis from early work at the National Cancer Institute, refinement by the National Toxicology Program and contemporary efforts to identify potential mechanisms and their relevance to human cancer risk. Subsequently, recently elucidated understanding of the molecular drivers and signaling mechanisms of liver pathophysiology and liver cancer, including factors associated with liver regeneration, metabolic hepatocellular zonation, and the role of macrophages and their crosstalk with stellate cells in understanding human liver disease was discussed. Next, our contemporary understanding of the role of nuclear receptors in hepatic homeostasis and drug response highlighting nuclear receptor activation and crosstalk in modulating biological responses associated with liver damage and neoplastic response were discussed. Finally, an overview and translational relevance of different drug-induced liver injury (DILI) rodent model systems focused on pathology and mechanisms with commentary on current relevant Food and Drug Administration (FDA) perspective were summarized with closing remarks.