1
|
Dawson H. Digital pathology – Rising to the challenge. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:888896. [PMID: 35935788 PMCID: PMC9354827 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.888896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Digital pathology has gone through considerable technical advances during the past few years and certain aspects of digital diagnostics have been widely and swiftly adopted in many centers, catalyzed by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, analysis of requirements, careful planning, and structured implementation should to be considered in order to reap the full benefits of a digital workflow. The aim of this review is to provide a practical, concise and hands-on summary of issues relevant to implementing and developing digital diagnostics in the pathology laboratory. These include important initial considerations, possible approaches to overcome common challenges, potential diagnostic pitfalls, validation and regulatory issues and an introduction to the emerging field of image analysis in routine.
Collapse
|
2
|
Fraggetta F, L’Imperio V, Ameisen D, Carvalho R, Leh S, Kiehl TR, Serbanescu M, Racoceanu D, Della Mea V, Polonia A, Zerbe N, Eloy C. Best Practice Recommendations for the Implementation of a Digital Pathology Workflow in the Anatomic Pathology Laboratory by the European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP). Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:2167. [PMID: 34829514 PMCID: PMC8623219 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The interest in implementing digital pathology (DP) workflows to obtain whole slide image (WSI) files for diagnostic purposes has increased in the last few years. The increasing performance of technical components and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of systems for primary diagnosis led to increased interest in applying DP workflows. However, despite this revolutionary transition, real world data suggest that a fully digital approach to the histological workflow has been implemented in only a minority of pathology laboratories. The objective of this study is to facilitate the implementation of DP workflows in pathology laboratories, helping those involved in this process of transformation to identify: (a) the scope and the boundaries of the DP transformation; (b) how to introduce automation to reduce errors; (c) how to introduce appropriate quality control to guarantee the safety of the process and (d) the hardware and software needed to implement DP systems inside the pathology laboratory. The European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP) provided consensus-based recommendations developed through discussion among members of the Scientific Committee. The recommendations are thus based on the expertise of the panel members and on the agreement obtained after virtual meetings. Prior to publication, the recommendations were reviewed by members of the ESDIP Board. The recommendations comprehensively cover every step of the implementation of the digital workflow in the anatomic pathology department, emphasizing the importance of interoperability, automation and tracking of the entire process before the introduction of a scanning facility. Compared to the available national and international guidelines, the present document represents a practical, handy reference for the correct implementation of the digital workflow in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Fraggetta
- European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Rua da Constituição n°668, 1° Esq/Traseiras, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal; (F.F.); (V.L.); (D.A.); (R.C.); (S.L.); (T.-R.K.); (M.S.); (D.R.); (V.D.M.); (A.P.); (N.Z.)
- Pathology Unit, “Gravina” Hospital, Caltagirone, ASP Catania, Via Portosalvo 1, 95041 Caltagirone, Italy
| | - Vincenzo L’Imperio
- European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Rua da Constituição n°668, 1° Esq/Traseiras, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal; (F.F.); (V.L.); (D.A.); (R.C.); (S.L.); (T.-R.K.); (M.S.); (D.R.); (V.D.M.); (A.P.); (N.Z.)
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, ASST Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - David Ameisen
- European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Rua da Constituição n°668, 1° Esq/Traseiras, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal; (F.F.); (V.L.); (D.A.); (R.C.); (S.L.); (T.-R.K.); (M.S.); (D.R.); (V.D.M.); (A.P.); (N.Z.)
- Imginit SAS, 152 Boulevard du Montparnasse, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Rita Carvalho
- European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Rua da Constituição n°668, 1° Esq/Traseiras, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal; (F.F.); (V.L.); (D.A.); (R.C.); (S.L.); (T.-R.K.); (M.S.); (D.R.); (V.D.M.); (A.P.); (N.Z.)
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sabine Leh
- European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Rua da Constituição n°668, 1° Esq/Traseiras, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal; (F.F.); (V.L.); (D.A.); (R.C.); (S.L.); (T.-R.K.); (M.S.); (D.R.); (V.D.M.); (A.P.); (N.Z.)
- Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies Vei 65, 5021 Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies Vei 87, 5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Tim-Rasmus Kiehl
- European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Rua da Constituição n°668, 1° Esq/Traseiras, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal; (F.F.); (V.L.); (D.A.); (R.C.); (S.L.); (T.-R.K.); (M.S.); (D.R.); (V.D.M.); (A.P.); (N.Z.)
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Mircea Serbanescu
- European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Rua da Constituição n°668, 1° Esq/Traseiras, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal; (F.F.); (V.L.); (D.A.); (R.C.); (S.L.); (T.-R.K.); (M.S.); (D.R.); (V.D.M.); (A.P.); (N.Z.)
- Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
| | - Daniel Racoceanu
- European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Rua da Constituição n°668, 1° Esq/Traseiras, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal; (F.F.); (V.L.); (D.A.); (R.C.); (S.L.); (T.-R.K.); (M.S.); (D.R.); (V.D.M.); (A.P.); (N.Z.)
- Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau—Paris Brain Institute—ICM, Inserm, CNRS, APHP, Inria Team “Aramis”, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Vincenzo Della Mea
- European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Rua da Constituição n°668, 1° Esq/Traseiras, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal; (F.F.); (V.L.); (D.A.); (R.C.); (S.L.); (T.-R.K.); (M.S.); (D.R.); (V.D.M.); (A.P.); (N.Z.)
- Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Antonio Polonia
- European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Rua da Constituição n°668, 1° Esq/Traseiras, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal; (F.F.); (V.L.); (D.A.); (R.C.); (S.L.); (T.-R.K.); (M.S.); (D.R.); (V.D.M.); (A.P.); (N.Z.)
- Ipatimup Diagnostics, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of Porto University (Ipatimup), 4200-804 Porto, Portugal
- Medical Faculty, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Norman Zerbe
- European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Rua da Constituição n°668, 1° Esq/Traseiras, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal; (F.F.); (V.L.); (D.A.); (R.C.); (S.L.); (T.-R.K.); (M.S.); (D.R.); (V.D.M.); (A.P.); (N.Z.)
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Catarina Eloy
- European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Rua da Constituição n°668, 1° Esq/Traseiras, 4200-194 Porto, Portugal; (F.F.); (V.L.); (D.A.); (R.C.); (S.L.); (T.-R.K.); (M.S.); (D.R.); (V.D.M.); (A.P.); (N.Z.)
- Ipatimup Diagnostics, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of Porto University (Ipatimup), 4200-804 Porto, Portugal
- Medical Faculty, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fraggetta F, Caputo A, Guglielmino R, Pellegrino MG, Runza G, L'Imperio V. A Survival Guide for the Rapid Transition to a Fully Digital Workflow: The "Caltagirone Example". Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:1916. [PMID: 34679614 PMCID: PMC8534326 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11101916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Digital pathology for the routine assessment of cases for primary diagnosis has been implemented by few laboratories worldwide. The Gravina Hospital in Caltagirone (Sicily, Italy), which collects cases from 7 different hospitals distributed in the Catania area, converted the entire workflow to digital starting from 2019. Before the transition, the Caltagirone pathology laboratory was characterized by a non-tracked workflow, based on paper requests, hand-written blocks and slides, as well as manual assembling and delivering of the cases and glass slides to the pathologists. Moreover, the arrangement of the spaces and offices in the department was illogical and under-productive for the linearity of the workflow. For these reasons, an adequate 2D barcode system for tracking purposes, the redistribution of the spaces inside the laboratory and the implementation of the whole-slide imaging (WSI) technology based on a laboratory information system (LIS)-centric approach were adopted as a needed prerequisite to switch to a digital workflow. The adoption of a dedicated connection for transfer of clinical and administrative data between different software and interfaces using an internationally recognised standard (Health Level 7, HL7) in the pathology department further facilitated the transition, helping in the integration of the LIS with WSI scanners. As per previous reports, the components and devices chosen for the pathologists' workstations did not significantly impact on the WSI-based reporting phase in primary histological diagnosis. An analysis of all the steps of this transition has been made retrospectively to provide a useful "handy" guide to lead the digital transition of "analog", non-tracked pathology laboratories following the experience of the Caltagirone pathology department. Following the step-by-step instructions, the implementation of a paperless routine with more standardized and safe processes, the possibility to manage the priority of the cases and to implement artificial intelligence (AI) tools are no more an utopia for every "analog" pathology department.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Fraggetta
- Pathology Unit, ASP Catania, “Gravina” Hospital, 95041 Caltagirone, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Caputo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, 84121 Salerno, Italy;
| | - Rosa Guglielmino
- Pathology Unit, ASP Catania, “Gravina” Hospital, 95041 Caltagirone, Italy;
| | | | - Giampaolo Runza
- Superintendency Unit, ASP Catania, “Gravina” Hospital, 95041 Caltagirone, Italy;
| | - Vincenzo L'Imperio
- Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, ASST Monza, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Perrotta P, Novis DA, Nelson S, Blond B, Stankovic A, Talbert M. Workflow Mapping-A Q-Probes Study of Preanalytic Testing Processes: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 35 Clinical Laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 144:1517-1524. [PMID: 32579404 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0043-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Workflow mapping is a tool used to characterize operational processes throughout most industries and to identify non-value-added activities. OBJECTIVE.— To develop a set of workflow mapping tools to compare the sequence and timing of activities, including waiting steps, used by clinical laboratories to process specimens during the preanalytic testing phase. DESIGN.— Laboratories enrolled in this College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study created workflow maps detailing the steps they used to process specimens from the time of sample arrival in the laboratory to the time of sample delivery to chemistry analyzers. Enrollees recorded the sequence and types of steps involved in specimen processing and the time needed to complete each step. RESULTS.— Institution average total specimen processing times (SPTs) and the number of steps required to prepare samples varied widely among institutions. Waiting steps, that is, steps requiring specimens to wait before advancing to the next process step, and specimen centrifugation consumed the greatest amount of processing times for both routine and STAT testing. Routine and STAT testing SPTs were shorter at institutions that used rapid centrifuges to prepare samples. Specimen processes requiring more sample waiting steps and computer entry steps had longer aggregate total process times than those with fewer such steps. CONCLUSIONS.— Aggregate specimen processing times may be shortened by reducing the number of steps involving sample waiting and computer entry activities. Rapid centrifugation is likely to reduce overall average institutional SPTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Perrotta
- the Department of Pathology, West Virginia University, West Virginia University Hospitals Inc, Morgantown (Perrotta)
| | - David A Novis
- From Novis Consulting, LLC, Portsmouth, New Hampshire (Novis)
| | - Suzanne Nelson
- Quality Practice Committee, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Nelson, Blond)
| | - Barbara Blond
- Quality Practice Committee, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Nelson, Blond)
| | - Anna Stankovic
- Koliada Consulting LLC, Flemington, New Jersey (Stankovic)
| | - Michael Talbert
- and the Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City (Talbert)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Galliano GE. Process Variation Detection using Missing Data in a Multihospital Community Practice Anatomic Pathology Laboratory. J Pathol Inform 2019; 10:25. [PMID: 31463161 PMCID: PMC6686573 DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_18_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Barcode-driven workflows reduce patient identification errors. Missing process timestamp data frequently confound our health system's pending lists and appear as actions left undone. Anecdotally, it was noted that missing data could be found when there is procedure noncompliance. This project was developed to determine if missing timestamp data in the histology barcode drive workflow correlated with other process variations, procedure noncompliance, or is an indicator of workflows needing focus for improvement projects. Materials and Methods: Data extracts of timestamp data from January 1, 2018, to December 15, 2018 for the major histology process steps were analyzed for missing data. Case level analysis to determine the presence or absence of expected barcoding events was performed on 1031 surgical pathology cases to determine the cause of the missing data and determine if additional data variations or procedure noncompliance events were present. The data variations were classified according to a scheme defined in the study. Results: Of 70,085, there were 7218 cases (10.3%) with missing process timestamp data. Missing histology process step data was associated with other additional data variations in case-level deep dives (P < 0.0001). Of the cases missing timestamp data in the initial review, 18.4% of the cases had no identifiable cause for the missing data (all expected events took place in the case-level deep dive). Conclusions: Operationally, valuable information can be obtained by reviewing the types and causes of missing data in the anatomic pathology laboratory information system, but only in conjunction with user input and feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gretchen E Galliano
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mandecki W, Qian J, Gedzberg K, Gruda M, Rodriguez E“F, Nesbitt L, Riben M. Electronic p-Chip-Based System for Identification of Glass Slides and Tissue Cassettes in Histopathology Laboratories. J Pathol Inform 2018; 9:9. [PMID: 29692946 PMCID: PMC5896163 DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_64_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2017] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The tagging system is based on a small, electronic, wireless, laser-light-activated microtransponder named “p-Chip.” The p-Chip is a silicon integrated circuit, the size of which is 600 μm × 600 μm × 100 μm. Each p-Chip contains a unique identification code stored within its electronic memory that can be retrieved with a custom reader. These features allow the p-Chip to be used as an unobtrusive and scarcely noticeable ID tag on glass slides and tissue cassettes. Methods: The system is comprised of p-Chip-tagged sample carriers, a dedicated benchtop p-Chip ID reader that can accommodate both objects, and an additional reader (the Wand), with an adapter for reading IDs of glass slides stored vertically in drawers. On slides, p-Chips are attached with adhesive to the center of the short edge, and on cassettes – embedded directly into the plastic. ID readout is performed by bringing the reader to the proximity of the chip. Standard histopathology laboratory protocols were used for testing. Results: Very good ID reading efficiency was observed for both glass slides and cassettes. When processed slides are stored in vertical filing drawers, p-Chips remain readable without the need to remove them from the storage location, thereby improving the speed of searches in collections. On the cassettes, the ID continues to be readable through a thin layer of paraffin. Both slides and tissue cassettes can be read with the same reader, reducing the need for redundant equipment. Conclusions: The p-Chip is stable to all chemical challenges commonly used in the histopathology laboratory, tolerates temperature extremes, and remains durable in long-term storage. The technology is compatible with laboratory information management systems software systems. The p-Chip system is very well suited for identification of glass slides and cassettes in the histopathology laboratory.
Collapse
|
7
|
Fraggetta F, Garozzo S, Zannoni GF, Pantanowitz L, Rossi ED. Routine Digital Pathology Workflow: The Catania Experience. J Pathol Inform 2017; 8:51. [PMID: 29416914 PMCID: PMC5760840 DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_58_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Successful implementation of whole slide imaging (WSI) for routine clinical practice has been accomplished in only a few pathology laboratories worldwide. We report the transition to an effective and complete digital surgical pathology workflow in the pathology laboratory at Cannizzaro Hospital in Catania, Italy. Methods: All (100%) permanent histopathology glass slides were digitized at ×20 using Aperio AT2 scanners. Compatible stain and scanning slide racks were employed to streamline operations. eSlide Manager software was bidirectionally interfaced with the anatomic pathology laboratory information system. Virtual slide trays connected to the two-dimensional (2D) barcode tracking system allowed pathologists to confirm that they were correctly assigned slides and that all tissues on these glass slides were scanned. Results: Over 115,000 glass slides were digitized with a scan fail rate of around 1%. Drying glass slides before scanning minimized them sticking to scanner racks. Implementation required introduction of a 2D barcode tracking system and modification of histology workflow processes. Conclusion: Our experience indicates that effective adoption of WSI for primary diagnostic use was more dependent on optimizing preimaging variables and integration with the laboratory information system than on information technology infrastructure and ensuring pathologist buy-in. Implementation of digital pathology for routine practice not only leveraged the benefits of digital imaging but also creates an opportunity for establishing standardization of workflow processes in the pathology laboratory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gian Franco Zannoni
- Division of Anatomic Pathology and Histology, School of Medicine, "Agostino Gemelli", Rome, Italy
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Esther Diana Rossi
- Division of Anatomic Pathology and Histology, School of Medicine, "Agostino Gemelli", Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|