1
|
Gudina AT, Kamen C, Mattick LJ, Cartujano-Barrera F, Janelsins MC, Ossip D, Rivera MP, Fiscella K, Cupertino AP. Knowledge and beliefs about lung cancer screening among Black individuals at high risk: a qualitative approach. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2024; 13:1877-1887. [PMID: 39263014 PMCID: PMC11384478 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-24-269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
Background Despite its efficacy in reducing lung cancer (LC)-specific mortality by 20%, screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in eligible groups remains low (5-16%). Black individuals are more commonly affected by LC than other racial/ethnic groups in the United States (U.S.) but less likely to undergo LC screening (LCS). Our study aimed to explore the knowledge and beliefs of Black individuals at high risk regarding LCS. Methods Black individuals (n=17) who met the 2021 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) LCS eligibility criteria were recruited in upstate New York. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio recorded, and transcribed to explore knowledge and beliefs that could influence the uptake of LCS. A qualitative thematic analysis method was used to identify and analyze themes within the data. Results We identified principal themes about LC and LCS. Although most participants reported that smoking was the major risk factor for LC, some participants placed more emphasis on other factors as the major risk factors for LC and de-emphasized the role of smoking. Most participants were not aware that screening for LC existed. Several barriers and facilitators for LCS were identified. Conclusions Awareness about LCS among Black individuals is low. Addressing barriers may help increase LCS rates among Black individuals, ultimately reducing their LC mortality. The findings from our study have important implications in designing more effective interventions involving community health workers and healthcare clinicians to increase LCS uptake among Black individuals at high risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdi T Gudina
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Charles Kamen
- Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Lindsey J Mattick
- Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Francisco Cartujano-Barrera
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Michelle C Janelsins
- Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Deborah Ossip
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - M Patricia Rivera
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Kevin Fiscella
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Ana-Paula Cupertino
- Surgical Health Outcomes and Reaching for Equity (SHORE), Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nourmohammadi N, Liang THP, Sadigh G. Patient-Provider Lung Cancer Screening Discussions: An Analysis of a National Survey. Clin Lung Cancer 2024; 25:e189-e195.e2. [PMID: 38522980 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The US Preventative Service Task Force (USPSTF) updated lung cancer screening (LCS) recommendations with annual low-dose CT (LDCT) in 2021. We aimed to assess prevalence of patient-provider discussion about LCS and determine its associated factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using data from Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2022 cycle 6, 2 cohorts were evaluated: (1) potentially LCS-eligible, included participants at least 50 years old with a history of smoking and no prior history of lung cancer; (2) LCS-ineligible individuals based on age (eg, 18-49 years old), smoking history (eg, never smoked), or history of lung cancer. We assessed association of demographic, clinical, and social factors with LDCT discussion in a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS Among potentially LCS-eligible patients, 19% had never heard of LDCT and only 9.4% had discussed LCS with their provider within the past year. Those who accessed online patient portals were more likely to discuss LCS with their healthcare provider (OR, 4.25; 95% CI, 1.67, 10.81; P, .003), as were respondents with a history of current (vs. former) smoking (OR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.21, 8.19; P, .019). Among LCS-ineligible, 1.9% discussed LCS with their providers. Individuals with a personal history of cancer (OR, 6.70; 95% CI, 1.65, 27.19; P, .009), and those who discussed colorectal cancer screening (OR, 5.74; 95% CI, 1.63, 20.14; P, .007) were more likely to discuss LCS with their provider. CONCLUSION Despite updated USPSTF recommendations, rates of patient-provider LCS remains low. Multi-level interventions to address barriers to LCS are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gelareh Sadigh
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Navuluri N, Lanford T, Shapiro A, Krishnan G, Johnson AB, Riley IL, Zullig LL, Cox CE, Shofer S. Barriers and Facilitators Impacting Lung Cancer Screening Uptake Among Black Veterans: A Qualitative Study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2024; 22:231-236. [PMID: 38640946 PMCID: PMC11392566 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial disparities in lung cancer screening (LCS) are well established. Black Veterans are among those at the highest risk for developing lung cancer but are less likely to complete LCS. We sought to identify barriers and facilitators to LCS uptake among Black Veterans. PATIENTS AND METHODS A qualitative study using semistructured interviews was conducted with 32 Black Veterans to assess for barriers, facilitators, and contextual factors for LCS and strategies to improve screening. Veterans were purposively sampled by age, sex, and LCS participation status (ie, patients who received a low-dose CT [LDCT], patients who contacted the screening program but did not receive an LDCT, and patients who did not connect with the screening program nor receive an LDCT). Interview guides were developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Health Belief Model. Data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. RESULTS Barriers of LCS uptake among Black Veterans include self-reported low LCS knowledge and poor memory, attention, and decision processes associated with the centralized LCS process. Facilitators of LCS uptake among Black Veterans include social/professional role; identity and social influences; perceived susceptibility, threat, and consequences due to smoking status and military or occupational exposures; emotion, behavioral regulation, and intentions; and high trust in providers. Environmental context and resources (eg, transportation) and race and racism serve as contextual factors that did not emerge as having a major impact on LCS uptake. Strategies to improve LCS uptake included increased social messaging surrounding LCS, various forms of information dissemination, LCS reminders, balanced and repeated shared decision-making discussions, and streamlined referrals. CONCLUSIONS We identified addressable barriers and facilitators for LCS uptake among Black Veterans that can help focus efforts to improve disparities in screening. Future studies should explore provider perspectives and test interventions to improve equity in LCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neelima Navuluri
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Department of Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Tiera Lanford
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veteran Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC
| | - Abigail Shapiro
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veteran Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC
| | - Govind Krishnan
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Isaretta L Riley
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Department of Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Leah L Zullig
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veteran Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Christopher E Cox
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Scott Shofer
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Department of Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lin YA, Lin X, Li Y, Wang F, Arbing R, Chen W, Huang F. Screening behaviors of high-risk individuals for lung cancer: A cross-sectional study. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2024; 11:100402. [PMID: 38495639 PMCID: PMC10944110 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate current screening behaviors among high-risk individuals and analyse the factors that influence them. Methods A cross-sectional of 1652 high-risk individuals were recruited in Fujian Province, China from February to October 2022. Socio-demographic characteristics of participants were collected and other survey measures included a lung cancer and lung cancer screening knowledge questionnaire and a stage of adoption algorithm. Standardized measures on surveys were comprised of the: Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales, Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Patient Trust in the Medical Profession Scale. Factors associated with screening behavior were identified using binary logistic regression analysis. Results Lung cancer screening behavior stages were largely reported as Stage 1 and Stage 2 (64.4%). The facilitators of lung cancer screening included urban residence (OR = 1.717, 95% CI: 1.224-2.408), holding administrative positions (OR = 16.601, 95% CI: 2.118-130.126), previous lung cancer screening behavior (OR = 10.331, 95% CI: 7.463-14.302), media exposure focused on lung cancer screening (OR = 1.868, 95% CI: 1.344-2.596), a high level of knowledge about lung cancer and lung cancer screening (OR = 1.256, 95% CI: 1.185-1.332), perceived risk of lung cancer (OR = 1.123, 95% CI: 1.029-1.225) and lung cancer screening health beliefs (OR = 1.090, 95% CI: 1.067-1.113). A barrier to lung cancer screening was found to be social influence (influence of friends or family) (OR = 0.669, 95% CI: 0.465-0.964). Conclusions This study found a low participation rate in lung cancer screening and identified eight factors that affected lung cancer screening behaviors among high-risk individuals. Findings suggest targeted lung cancer screening programs should be developed based on identified influencing factors in order to effectively promote awareness and uptake of lung cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-An Lin
- The 900th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, PLA, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Xiujing Lin
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yonglin Li
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Fangfang Wang
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Rachel Arbing
- School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Weiti Chen
- School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Feifei Huang
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Research Center for Nursing Humanity, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rong F, Shi R, Hu L, Wang D, Lv X, Zhao Y. Impact of risk perception and disease cognition on the willingness to participate in screening for lung cancer in a high-risk population. Eur J Cancer Prev 2024; 33:141-151. [PMID: 37751366 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Risk perception and disease cognition may influence the efficiency of lung cancer screening by affecting the participation rate. There is still some uncertainty regarding the association between risk perception and disease cognition and how they affect participation in lung cancer screening. Therefore, we explored the influence of risk perception and disease cognition on the willingness to participate in screening among people at high risk of lung cancer. METHODS Subjects with high-risk factors for lung cancer were recruited in Lu'an City, Anhui Province, China. Questionnaires were used to determine their demographic characteristics, risk perception, disease cognition, and willingness to engage in screening. RESULTS Of the 1955 subjects with high risk factors for lung cancer, 1136 (58.12%) were willing to participate in lung cancer screening. Univariable and multivariable analyses showed that disease cognition ( adj OR = 2.012, 95% CI: 1.528-2.649, P = 0.000), cognitive risk ( adj OR = 7.661, 95% CI: 6.049-9.704, P = 0.000), and affective risk ( adj OR = 5.964, 95% CI: 4.552-7.815, P = 0.000) were significant factors in promoting screening participation. For those with moderate risk perception, improving disease cognition was a key approach to increase screening participation. CONCLUSION This study elucidated the relationship between various factors and lung cancer screening participation and proposed a feasible route for the screening implementation, providing a theoretical basis to further improve the participation rate and efficiency of lung cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Rong
- Cancer center, Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an, Anhui, China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hasson RM, Bridges CJ, Curley RJ, Erhunmwunsee L. Access to Lung Cancer Screening. Thorac Surg Clin 2023; 33:353-363. [PMID: 37806738 DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2023.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Rural and racial/ethnic minority communities experience higher risk and mortality from lung cancer. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography reduces mortality. However, disparities persist in the uptake of lung cancer screening, especially in marginalized communities. Barriers to lung cancer screening are multilevel and include patient, provider, and system-level barriers. This discussion highlights the key barriers faced by rural and racial/ethnic minority communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rian M Hasson
- Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA; The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Rope Ferry Rd, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; The Dartmouth Institute of Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Williamson Translational Research Building, Level 51 Medical Center Drive Lebanon, NH 03756, USA
| | - Connor J Bridges
- The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Rope Ferry Rd, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| | - Richard J Curley
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Loretta Erhunmwunsee
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA; Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Djuric O, Giorgi Rossi P, Ivanciu EC, Cardellicchio S, Cresci C, Carozzi L, Pistelli F, Bessi V, Gai P, Galli V, Lavacchini G, Bricci C, Gorini G, Bosi S, Paci E. Motivation, acceptability and attitudes toward lung cancer screening among persons who attend a tobacco cessation program: A multicenter survey in Italy. Prev Med Rep 2023; 35:102272. [PMID: 37384117 PMCID: PMC10293766 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate smoking cessation (SC) motivation and the acceptability of a lung cancer screening (LCS) program with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) among people who attend SC programs. A multicenter survey was conducted in the period January-December 2021 involving 197 people who attended group or individual SC courses in Reggio Emilia and Tuscany. Questionnaires, information sheets, and decision aids about the potential benefits and harms of LCS with LDCT were distributed at different time points during the course. The wish to protect own health (66%) was the most frequent reason given for quitting smoking, followed by cigarette dependence (40.6%) and current health problems (30.5%). Half of the participants (56%) considered periodic health checks including LDCT, as an advantageous activity. The great majority of participants were in favor of LCS (92%), with only 8% being indifferent, and no one was against these programs. Interestingly, those with sufficiently high smoking-related LC risk to be eligible for LCS and those attending the individual course were less in favor of LCS but also less concerned about the possible harms associated with LCS. The type of counseling was a significant predictor for both LCS acceptability and perceived harm of LCS. The favorable perception of LCS in people attending SC courses, despite the considerable preoccupation with potential harms, is an important finding of this study. Introducing a discussion on the benefits and harms of LCS in SC programs may prepare persons who smoke to make informed decisions on utilizing LCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivera Djuric
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Centre for Environmental, Nutritional and Genetic Epidemiology (CREAGEN), Public Health Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Elena Camelia Ivanciu
- Public Health Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Cresci
- Antismoking Center, Florence-Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Carozzi
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Pistelli
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Valentina Bessi
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Patrizia Gai
- Antismoking Center, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Toscana Center, Italy
| | - Valentina Galli
- Antismoking Center, Prato, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Toscana Center, Italy
| | - Giacomo Lavacchini
- Antismoking Center, Borgo San Lorenzo, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Toscana Center, Italy
| | - Claudia Bricci
- Italian League against Cancer (LILT), Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Gorini
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Governance, Institute for Study, PRevention and netwoRk in Oncology (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Sandra Bosi
- Italian League against Cancer (LILT), Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Eugenio Paci
- Italian League against Cancer (LILT), Florence, Italy
| | - Working Group
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Centre for Environmental, Nutritional and Genetic Epidemiology (CREAGEN), Public Health Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Public Health Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Antismoking Center, Florence-Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
- Antismoking Center, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Toscana Center, Italy
- Antismoking Center, Prato, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Toscana Center, Italy
- Antismoking Center, Borgo San Lorenzo, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Toscana Center, Italy
- Italian League against Cancer (LILT), Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Governance, Institute for Study, PRevention and netwoRk in Oncology (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
- Italian League against Cancer (LILT), Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Golding SA, Hasson RM, Kinney LM, Kyung EJ, Bardach SH, Perry AN, Boardman MB, Halloran SR, Youkilis SL, Fay KA, Bird TL, Bridges CJ, Schifferdecker KE. Assessing and Identifying Improvements for Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Population: A Human-Centered Design and Systems Approach. Am J Med Qual 2023; 38:218-228. [PMID: 37656607 DOI: 10.1097/jmq.0000000000000136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
Although lung cancer claims more lives than any other cancer in the United States, screening is severely underutilized, with <6% of eligible patients screened nationally in 2021 versus 76% for breast cancer and 67% for colorectal cancer. This article describes an effort to identify key reasons for the underutilization of lung cancer screening in a rural population and to develop interventions to address these barriers suitable for both a large health system and local community clinics. Data were generated from 26 stakeholder interviews (clinicians, clinical staff, and eligible patients), a review of key systems (Electronic Health Record and billing records), and feedback on the feasibility of several potential interventions by health care system staff. These data informed a human-centered design approach to identify possible interventions within a complex health care system by exposing gaps in care processes and electronic health record platforms that can lead patients to be overlooked for potentially life-saving screening. Deployed interventions included communication efforts focused on (1) increasing patient awareness, (2) improving physician patient identification, and (3) supporting patient management. Preliminary outcomes are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaun A Golding
- Center for Program Design and Evaluation, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
| | - Rian M Hasson
- Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
| | - Linda M Kinney
- Center for Program Design and Evaluation, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
| | | | - Shoshana H Bardach
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
| | - Amanda N Perry
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
| | - Maureen B Boardman
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
- Northern New England CO-OP Practice and Community Based Research Network, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH
| | - Sean R Halloran
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
- Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
| | | | - Kayla A Fay
- Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH
| | | | | | - Karen E Schifferdecker
- Center for Program Design and Evaluation, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Presant CA, Ashing K, Raz D, Yeung S, Gascon B, Stewart A, Macalintal J, Sandoval A, Ehrunmwunsee L, Phillips T, Salgia R, Merla A, Subbiah S, El-Hajjouie M, Staley J, Graves H, Pathak R, Dingal S, Sampath S, Laksana B, Joseph T, Eugenio T, Degoma V, Burns K, Phillips S, Tan T, Tarkshian K, Sun V, Amini A, Davy K, Cronkhite J, Cianfrocca M, Brown S, Fong Y, Rosen S. Overcoming Barriers to Tobacco Cessation and Lung Cancer Screening among Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups and Underserved Patients in Academic Centers and Community Network Sites: The City of Hope Experience. J Clin Med 2023; 12:1275. [PMID: 36835811 PMCID: PMC9965998 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco control is important for cancer patient health, but delivering effective low-dose CT (LDCT) screening and tobacco cessation is more difficult in underserved and patients from racial and ethnic minority groups. At City of Hope (COH), we have developed strategies to overcome barriers to the delivery of LDCT and tobacco cessation. METHODS We performed a needs assessment. New tobacco control program services were implemented focusing on patients from racial and ethnic minority groups. Innovations included Whole Person Care with motivational counseling, placing clinician and nurse champions at points of care, training module and leadership newsletters, and a patient-centric personalized medicine Personalized Pathways to Success (PPS) program. RESULTS Emphasis on patients from racial and ethnic minority groups was implemented by training cessation personnel and lung cancer control champions. LDCT increased. Tobacco use assessment increased and abstinence was 27.2%. The PPS pilot program achieved 47% engagement in cessation, with self-reported abstinence at 3 months of 38%, with both results slightly higher in patients from racial and ethnic minority groups than in Caucasian patients. CONCLUSIONS Tobacco cessation barrier-focused innovations can result in increased lung cancer screening and tobacco cessation reach and effectiveness, especially among patients from racial and ethnic minority groups. The PPS program is promising as a personalized medicine patient-centric approach to cessation and lung cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cary A. Presant
- City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhu W, Love K, Gray SW, Raz DJ. Liquid Biopsy Screening for Early Detection of Lung Cancer: Current State and Future Directions. Clin Lung Cancer 2023; 24:209-217. [PMID: 36797152 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Liquid biopsy (LB) is clinically utilized to detect minute amounts of genetic material or protein shed by cancer cells, most commonly cell free DNA (cfDNA), as a noninvasive precision oncology tool to assess genomic alterations to guide cancer therapy or to detect the persistence of tumor cells after therapy. LB is also being developed as a multi-cancer screening assay. The use of LB holds great promise as a tool to detect lung cancer early. Although lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) substantially reduces lung cancer mortality in high-risk individuals, the ability of current LCS guidelines to reduce the public health burden of advanced lung cancer through early detection has been limited. LB may be an important tool to improve early lung cancer detection among all populations at risk for lung cancer. In this systematic review, we summarize the test characteristics, including sensitivity and specificity of individual tests, as they pertain to the detection of lung cancer. We also address critical questions in the use of liquid biopsy for early detection of lung cancer including: 1. How might liquid biopsy be used to detect lung cancer early; 2. How accurate is liquid biopsy in detecting lung cancer early; and 3. Does liquid biopsy perform as well in never and light-smokers compared with current and former smokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Zhu
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Kyra Love
- Library Services, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Stacy W Gray
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research/ Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Dan J Raz
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cavers D, Nelson M, Rostron J, Robb KA, Brown LR, Campbell C, Akram AR, Dickie G, Mackean M, van Beek EJR, Sullivan F, Steele RJ, Neilson AR, Weller D. Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature. Respir Res 2022; 23:374. [PMID: 36564817 PMCID: PMC9789658 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-022-02255-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted lung cancer screening is effective in reducing mortality by upwards of twenty percent. However, screening is not universally available and uptake is variable and socially patterned. Understanding screening behaviour is integral to designing a service that serves its population and promotes equitable uptake. We sought to review the literature to identify barriers and facilitators to screening to inform the development of a pilot lung screening study in Scotland. METHODS We used Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology and PRISMA-ScR framework to identify relevant literature to meet the study aims. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies published between January 2000 and May 2021 were identified and reviewed by two reviewers for inclusion, using a list of search terms developed by the study team and adapted for chosen databases. RESULTS Twenty-one articles met the final inclusion criteria. Articles were published between 2003 and 2021 and came from high income countries. Following data extraction and synthesis, findings were organised into four categories: Awareness of lung screening, Enthusiasm for lung screening, Barriers to lung screening, and Facilitators or ways of promoting uptake of lung screening. Awareness of lung screening was low while enthusiasm was high. Barriers to screening included fear of a cancer diagnosis, low perceived risk of lung cancer as well as practical barriers of cost, travel and time off work. Being health conscious, provider endorsement and seeking reassurance were all identified as facilitators of screening participation. CONCLUSIONS Understanding patient reported barriers and facilitators to lung screening can help inform the implementation of future lung screening pilots and national lung screening programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Cavers
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 1, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG UK
| | - Mia Nelson
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 1, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG UK
| | - Jasmin Rostron
- The National Institute of Economic and Social Research, 2 Dean Trench Street, London, NW1P 3HE UK
| | - Kathryn A. Robb
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ UK
| | - Lynsey R. Brown
- School of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, KY16 9TF UK
| | - Christine Campbell
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 1, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG UK
| | - Ahsan R. Akram
- MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Graeme Dickie
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 1, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG UK
| | - Melanie Mackean
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU UK
| | - Edwin J. R. van Beek
- Edinburgh Imaging, Queen’s Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ UK
| | - Frank Sullivan
- School of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, KY16 9TF UK
| | - Robert J. Steele
- School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, DD1 9SY UK
| | - Aileen R. Neilson
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 1, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG UK
| | - David Weller
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 1, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cavers D, Nelson M, Rostron J, Robb KA, Brown LR, Campbell C, Akram AR, Dickie G, Mackean M, van Beek EJR, Sullivan F, Steele RJ, Neilson AR, Weller D. Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study. Health Expect 2022; 25:3246-3258. [PMID: 36263948 PMCID: PMC9700133 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Targeted lung cancer screening is effective in reducing lung cancer and all-cause mortality according to major trials in the United Kingdom and Europe. However, the best ways of implementing screening in local communities requires an understanding of the population the programme will serve. We undertook a study to explore the views of those potentially eligible for, and to identify potential barriers and facilitators to taking part in, lung screening, to inform the development of a feasibility study. METHODS Men and women aged 45-70, living in urban and rural Scotland, and either self-reported people who smoke or who recently quit, were invited to take part in the study via research agency Taylor McKenzie. Eleven men and 14 women took part in three virtual focus groups exploring their views on lung screening. Focus group transcripts were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis, assisted by QSR NVivo. FINDINGS Three overarching themes were identified: (1) Knowledge, awareness and acceptability of lung screening, (2) Barriers and facilitators to screening and (3) Promoting screening and implementation ideas. Participants were largely supportive of lung screening in principle and described the importance of the early detection of cancer. Emotional and psychological concerns as well as system-level and practical issues were discussed as posing barriers and facilitators to lung screening. CONCLUSIONS Understanding the views of people potentially eligible for a lung health check can usefully inform the development of a further study to test the feasibility and acceptability of lung screening in Scotland. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The LUNGSCOT study has convened a patient advisory group to advise on all aspects of study development and implementation. Patient representatives commented on the focus group study design, study materials and ethics application, and two representatives read the focus group transcripts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Cavers
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher InstituteUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Mia Nelson
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher InstituteUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Jasmin Rostron
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher InstituteUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- Present address:
The National Institute of Economic and Social Research2 Dean Trench Street, London NW1P 3HEUK
| | - Kathryn A. Robb
- School of Health and WellbeingUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | | | - Christine Campbell
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher InstituteUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Ahsan R. Akram
- Centre for Inflammation Research and Edinburgh Cancer Research CentreUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Graeme Dickie
- Care of the Usher InstituteUniversity of Edinburgh, EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | | | - Edwin J. R. van Beek
- Edinburgh Imaging, Queen's Medical Research InstituteUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | | | - Robert J. Steele
- School of Medicine, Ninewells HospitalUniversity of DundeeDundeeUK
| | - Aileen R. Neilson
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher InstituteUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - David Weller
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher InstituteUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sedani AE, Davis OC, Clifton SC, Campbell JE, Chou AF. Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening: A Framework-Driven Systematic Review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:1449-1467. [PMID: 35993616 PMCID: PMC9664175 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to undertake a comprehensive systematic review to describe multilevel factors (barriers and facilitators) that may influence the implementation of low-dose chest computed tomography for lung cancer screening in the United States. METHODS Systematic literature searches were performed using 6 online databases and citation indexes for peer-reviewed studies, for articles published from 2013 to 2021. Studies were classified into 3 perspectives, based on the study's unit of analysis: system, health-care provider, and patient. Barriers and facilitators identified for each study included in our final review were then coded and categorized using the Consolidate Framework for Implementation Research domains. RESULTS At the system level, the 2 most common constructs were external policy and incentives and executing the implementation process. At the provider level, the most common constructs were evidence strength and quality of the intervention characteristics, patient needs and resources, implementation climate, and an individual's knowledge and beliefs about the intervention. At the patient level, the most common constructs were patient needs and resources, individual's knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, and engaging in the implementation process. These constructs can act as facilitators or barriers to lung cancer screening implementation. CONCLUSIONS Applying the Consolidate Framework for Implementation Research domains and constructs to understand and specify factors facilitating uptake of lung cancer screening as well as cataloging the lessons learned from previous efforts helps inform the development and implementation processes of lung cancer screening programs in the community setting. REGISTRATION PROSPERO, CRD42021247677.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ami E Sedani
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Olivia C Davis
- College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Shari C Clifton
- Robert M. Bird Health Sciences Library, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Janis E Campbell
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Ann F Chou
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Olson RE, Goldsmith L, Winter S, Spaulding E, Dunn N, Mander S, Ryan A, Smith A, Marshall HM. Emotions and lung cancer screening: Prioritising a humanistic approach to care. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e5259-e5269. [PMID: 35894098 PMCID: PMC10947369 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening has mortality benefits. Yet, uptake has been low. To inform strategies to better deliver and promote screening, in 2018, we interviewed 27 long-term smokers immediately following lung cancer screening in Australia, prior to receiving scan results. Existing lung screening studies employ the Health Belief Model. Reflecting growing acknowledgement of the centrality of emotions to screening uptake, we draw on psychological and sociological theories on emotions to thematically and abductively analyse the emotional dimensions of lung cancer screening, with implications for screening promotion and delivery. As smokers, interviewees described feeling stigmatised, with female participants internalising and male participants resisting stigma. Guilt and fear related to lung cancer were described as screening motivators. The screening itself elicited mild positive emotions. Notably, interviewees expressed gratitude for the care implicitly shown through lung screening to smokers. More than individual risk assessment, findings suggest lung screening campaigns should prioritise emotions. Peer workers have been found to increase cancer screening uptake in marginalised communities, however the risk to confidentiality-especially for female smokers-limits its feasibility in lung cancer screening. Instead, we suggest involving peer consultants in developing targeted screening strategies that foreground emotions. Furthermore, findings suggest prioritising humanistic care in lung screening delivery. Such an approach may be especially important for smokers from low socioeconomic backgrounds, who perceive lung cancer screening and smoking as sources of stigma and face a higher risk of dying from lung cancer and lower engagement with screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca E. Olson
- School of Social ScienceThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaQueenslandAustralia
| | | | - Sara Winter
- School of Applied PsychologyGriffith UniversityMt GravattQueenslandAustralia
| | | | - Nicola Dunn
- The Prince Charles HospitalChermsideQueenslandAustralia
| | - Sarah Mander
- Psychology DepartmentThe Prince Charles HospitalChermsideQueenslandAustralia
| | - Alyssa Ryan
- Cancer Care ServicesThe Prince Charles HospitalChermsideQueenslandAustralia
| | - Alexandra Smith
- School of Social ScienceThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaQueenslandAustralia
| | - Henry M. Marshall
- University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre and Department of Thoracic MedicineThe Prince Charles HospitalChermsideQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lin YA, Hong YT, Lin XJ, Lin JL, Xiao HM, Huang FF. Barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung cancer screening: A mixed methods systematic review. Lung Cancer 2022; 172:9-18. [PMID: 35963208 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Numerous factors contribute to the low adherence to lung cancer screening (LCS) programs. A theory-informed approach to identifying the obstacles and facilitators to LCS uptake is required. This study aimed to identify, assess, and synthesize the available literature at the individual and healthcare provider (HCP) levels based on a social-ecological model and identify gaps to improve practice and policy decision-making. Systematic searches were conducted in nine electronic databases from inception to December 31, 2020. We also searched Google Scholar and manually examined the reference lists of systematic reviews to include relevant articles. Primary studies were scored for quality assessment. Among 3938 potentially relevant articles, 36 studies, including 25 quantitative and 11 qualitative studies, were identified for inclusion in the review. Fifteen common factors were extracted from 34 studies, including nine barriers and six facilitators. The barriers included individual factors (n = 5), health system factors (n = 3), and social/environmental factors (n = 1). The facilitators included only individual factors (n = 6). However, two factors, age and screening harm, remain mixed. This systematic review identified and combined barriers and facilitators to LCS uptake at the individual and HCP levels. The interaction mechanisms among these factors should be further explored, which will allow the construction of tailored LCS recommendations or interventions for the Chinese context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-An Lin
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yu Ting Hong
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Xiu Jing Lin
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jia Ling Lin
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Hui Min Xiao
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Fei Fei Huang
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bujarski S, Flowers R, Alkhunaizi M, Cuvi D, Sathya S, Melcher J, Kheradmand F, Holt G. Challenges in initiating a lung cancer screening program: Experiences from two VA medical centers. Semin Oncol 2022; 49:S0093-7754(22)00046-X. [PMID: 35853765 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Establishing a lung cancer screening (LCS) program is an important endeavor that delivers life-saving healthcare to an at-risk population. However, developing a comprehensive LCS program requires critical elements including obtaining institutional level buy-in, hiring necessary personnel, developing appropriate infrastructure and actively engaging primary care providers, subspecialty services, and radiology. The process required to connect such services to deliver an organized LCS program that reaches all eligible candidates must be individualized to each institution's needs and infrastructure. Here we provide detailed experiences from two successful LCS programs, one using a primary care provider-based service and the other using a consult-based service. In each case, we provide the pros and cons of each system. We propose that the decision to setup an ideal LCS program could include a hybrid design that combines aspects of each system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Bujarski
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston TX, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX, USA.
| | - Robert Flowers
- Department of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Dave Cuvi
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Miami VA Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Sneha Sathya
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jennifer Melcher
- Lung Precision Oncology Program, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Farrah Kheradmand
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston TX, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX, USA
| | - Gregory Holt
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Miami VA Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Le Bonniec A, Sun S, Andrin A, Dima AL, Letrilliart L. Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Health Screening: an Umbrella Review Across Conditions. PREVENTION SCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH 2022; 23:1115-1142. [PMID: 35705780 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-022-01388-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Screening is an essential prevention practice for a number of health conditions. However, screening coverage remains generally low. Studies that investigate determinants of screening participation are becoming more common, but oftentimes investigate screening for health conditions in an individualized rather than integrated fashion. In routine clinical practice, however, healthcare professionals are often confronted with situations in which several screening procedures are recommended for the same patient. The consideration of their common determinants may support a more integrated screening approach. The objectives of this umbrella review were therefore to examine: 1) the determinants (barriers and facilitators) that have been identified in relation to recommended health screening procedures; and 2) the modifiable determinants (in primary care) common across health conditions or specific to individual procedures. Results were presented through a narrative synthesis. PubMed, PsycInfo and Cochrane were searched up to January 2022. Systematic reviews reporting determinants of participation in health screening procedures with grade A or B recommendation according to the US Preventive Services Task Force were included. A total of 85 systematic reviews were included, most which contained both qualitative and quantitative studies on determinants that describe individual factors (961 occurrences), social factors (113 occurrences, healthcare professional factors (149 occurrences), health system factors (105 occurrences) and screening procedure factors (99 occurrences). The most studied screening procedures concerned cervical cancer/human papillomavirus (n = 33), breast cancer (n = 28), colorectal cancer (n = 25) and the human immunodeficiency virus (n = 12). Other conditions have been under-studied (e.g. cardiovascular problems, lung cancer, syphilis). The individual domain, including determinants such as knowledge, beliefs and emotions, was the most covered across health conditions. Healthcare professional's recommendations and the quality of patient-provider communication were identified to have a strong influence on screening participation in most conditions. The other three domains included determinants which were more specific to a condition or a population. Various determinants modifiable in primary care were found in the individual domain and in the health system, healthcare professional and screening procedure domains. Quality was assessed as low for most systematic reviews included. The identification of various modifiable determinants common across conditions highlights the potential of an integrated screening participation approach. Interventions may address common determinants in a broader person-centred framework within which tailoring to specific procedures or populations can be considered. This approach needs to be explored in intervention studies. The systematic review registration is PROSPERO CRD42019126709.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Le Bonniec
- Research On Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
- Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale (GRePS) EA4163, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
| | - Sophie Sun
- Research On Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Collège Universitaire de Médecine Générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Amandine Andrin
- Research On Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale (GRePS) EA4163, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France
| | - Alexandra L Dima
- Research On Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Letrilliart
- Research On Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Collège Universitaire de Médecine Générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bold KW, Cannon S, Ford BB, Neveu S, Sather P, Toll BA, Fucito LM. Examining Tobacco Treatment Perceptions and Barriers among Black versus Non-Black Adults Attending Lung Cancer Screening. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2022; 15:327-333. [PMID: 35063942 PMCID: PMC9064926 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-21-0398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends annual lung cancer screening for patients at high risk based on age and smoking history. Understanding the characteristics of patients attending lung cancer screening, including potential barriers to quitting smoking, may inform ways to engage these high-risk patients in tobacco treatment and address health disparities. Patients attending lung cancer screening who currently smoke cigarettes completed a survey at Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven (N = 74) and the Medical University of South Carolina (N = 73) at the time of their appointment. The survey assessed demographics, smoking history, and perceptions and concerns about quitting smoking. Patients were 55 to 76 years old (mean = 63.3, SD = 5.3), N = 64 (43.5%) female, and N = 31 (21.1%) non-Hispanic Black. Patients smoked 16.3 cigarettes per day on average (SD = 9.2) and rated interest in quitting smoking in the next month as moderate (mean = 5.6, SD = 3.1, measured from 0 = "very definitely no" to 10 = "very definitely yes"). The most frequently endorsed concerns about quitting smoking were missing smoking (70.7%), worry about having strong urges to smoke (63.9%), and concerns about withdrawal symptoms (59.9%). In comparison with other races/ethnicities, Black patients were less likely to report concerns about withdrawal symptoms and more likely to report smoking less now and perceiving no need to quit. Findings identified specific barriers for tobacco treatment and differences by race/ethnicity among patients attending lung cancer screening, including concerns about withdrawal symptoms and perceived need to quit. Identifying ways to promote tobacco treatment is important for reducing morbidity and mortality among this high-risk population. PREVENTION RELEVANCE The current study examines patient characteristics and tobacco treatment perceptions and barriers among patients attending lung cancer screening who continue to smoke cigarettes that may help inform ways to increase treatment engagement and address tobacco-related health disparities to reduce morbidity and mortality from smoking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krysten W Bold
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Sydney Cannon
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Bennie B Ford
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Susan Neveu
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Polly Sather
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Benjamin A Toll
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Lisa M Fucito
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Worry About the Future Health Issues of Smoking and Intention to Screen for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography. Cancer Nurs 2022; 45:E146-E152. [PMID: 34870941 PMCID: PMC8649175 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early diagnosis of lung cancer is key to improving the long-term prognosis for many individuals. Still, utilization rates of lung cancer screening (LCS) remain low. OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between worry about future health issues of smoking and intention to undergo recommended LCS with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) within the next 3 months. METHODS A cross-sectional online survey was conducted using the Qualtrics Panel to recruit adult smokers between ages 54 and 75 years, with no history of lung cancer, and at least 30-pack-year smoking history (n = 152). The survey gathered demographic, socioeconomic, and psychographic information, including intention to screen for lung cancer with LDCT and worry about the future health issues of smoking. Data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Approximately 43.0% were White, 21.7% were Black, and 60.0% were female. Most (86.0%) reported intentions to undergo recommended LCS with LDCT in the next 3 months. More than one-third (32.0%) reported moderately/very worried about the future health issues of smoking. Smokers who were moderately/very worried had 20% (P = .022) higher odds of reporting an intention to undergo LCS with LDCT than those who were not at all or a little worried. CONCLUSIONS Most eligible adults reported intentions to undergo LCS with LDCT. Our study also highlights sex, racial, and socioeconomic differences in LCS behavior. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The study findings provide an opportunity for healthcare providers to have in-depth discussions about the benefits of LCS with those who express worry about future health issues of smoking.
Collapse
|
20
|
Sosa E, D’Souza G, Akhtar A, Sur M, Love K, Duffels J, Raz DJ, Kim JY, Sun V, Erhunmwunsee L. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening in the United States: A systematic review. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71:299-314. [PMID: 34015860 PMCID: PMC8266751 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths. Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces NSCLC mortality; however, a lack of diversity in LCS studies may limit the generalizability of the results to marginalized groups who face higher risk for and worse outcomes from NSCLC. Identifying sources of inequity in the LCS pipeline is essential to reduce disparities in NSCLC outcomes. The authors searched 3 major databases for studies published from January 1, 2010 to February 27, 2020 that met the following criteria: 1) included screenees between ages 45 and 80 years who were current or former smokers, 2) written in English, 3) conducted in the United States, and 4) discussed socioeconomic and race-based LCS outcomes. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias. Of 3721 studies screened, 21 were eligible. Eligible studies were evaluated, and their findings were categorized into 3 themes related to LCS disparities faced by Black and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals: 1) eligibility; 2) utilization, perception, and utility; and 3) postscreening behavior and care. Disparities in LCS exist along racial and socioeconomic lines. There are several steps along the LCS pipeline in which Black and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals miss the potential benefits of LCS, resulting in increased mortality. This study identified potential sources of inequity that require further investigation. The authors recommend the implementation of prospective trials that evaluate eligibility criteria for underserved groups and the creation of interventions focused on improving utilization and follow-up care to decrease LCS disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernesto Sosa
- Department of Populations Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center
| | - Gail D’Souza
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Aamna Akhtar
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Melissa Sur
- Department of Populations Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center
| | - Kyra Love
- Division of Library Services, City of Hope National Medical Center
| | - Jeanette Duffels
- Division of Library Services, City of Hope National Medical Center
| | - Dan J Raz
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Jae Y Kim
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Virginia Sun
- Department of Populations Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Loretta Erhunmwunsee
- Department of Populations Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
van Meerbeeck JP, Franck C. Lung cancer screening in Europe: where are we in 2021? Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:2407-2417. [PMID: 34164288 PMCID: PMC8182708 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
This manuscript reviews the recent evidence obtained in lung cancer screening with low dose spiral CT-scan (LDSCT) and focuses on the issues associated with its implementation in Europe. After a review of the magnitude of the lung cancer toll in lives, disease and Euro's, the recently released data of the major lung cancer screening trials are reviewed and mirrored with the results of the US National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), comparing their strengths and weaknesses and areas of future research. The specific barriers and hurdles to be addressed for widely implementing this population screening in European countries are discussed, with special emphasis on the issues of inclusion of smokers, smoking cessation interventions, radiation injury and capacity planning. The pros and cons of including current smokers will be addressed together with the issue which is the better smoking cessation intervention. A medical physicist's view on radiation exposure and quality control will address concerns about radiation induced cancers. The downstream effects of a LDSCT screening program on the capacity of CT-scans, radiologists, thoracic surgeons and radiation oncologists will follow. An estimated roadmap for the future is sketched with the expected role of all key stakeholders. This roadmap reflects the opinion leader's reflections as expressed in a number of discussions with European health authorities, taking place as part of the recently released European Beating Cancer plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan P. van Meerbeeck
- Department of Pulmonology & Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Caro Franck
- Department of Medical Imaging, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Turner J, Pond GR, Tremblay A, Johnston M, Goss G, Nicholas G, Martel S, Bhatia R, Liu G, Schmidt H, Tammemagi MC, Puksa S, Atkar-Khattra S, Tsao MS, Lam S, Goffin JR. Risk Perception Among a Lung Cancer Screening Population. Chest 2021; 160:718-730. [PMID: 33667493 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A successful lung cancer screening program requires a patient cohort at sufficient risk of developing cancer who are willing to participate. Among other factors, a patient's lung cancer risk perception may inform their attitudes toward screening and smoking cessation programs. RESEARCH QUESTION This study analyzed data from the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer (PanCan) Study to address the following questions: Which factors are associated with the perception of lung cancer risk? Is there an association between risk perception for lung cancer and actual calculated risk? Is there an association between risk perception for lung cancer and the intent to quit smoking? Are there potential targets for lung cancer screening awareness? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS The PanCan study recruited current or former smokers aged 50 to 75 years who had at least a 2% risk of developing lung cancer over 6 years to undergo low-dose screening CT. Risk perception and worry about lung cancer were captured on a baseline questionnaire. Cumulative logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between baseline risk variables and both lung cancer risk perception and worry. RESULTS Among the 2,514 individuals analyzed, a higher perceived risk of lung cancer was positively associated with calculated risk (P = .032). Younger age, being a former smoker, respiratory symptoms, lower FEV1, COPD, and a family history of lung cancer were associated with higher perceived risk. Conversely, a consistent relationship between calculated risk and worry was not identified. There was a positive association between risk perception and lung cancer worry and reported intent to quit smoking. INTERPRETATION Individuals' lung cancer risk perception correlated positively with calculated risk in a screening population. Promotion of screening programs may benefit from focusing on factors associated with higher risk perception; conversely, harnessing worry seemingly holds less value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Glen Goss
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Simon Martel
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | | | - Geoffrey Liu
- University Health Network and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Heidi Schmidt
- University Health Network and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Ming-Sound Tsao
- University Health Network and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen Lam
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Raz DJ, Ismail MH, Haupt EC, Sun V, Park S, Alem AC, Gould MK. Improving Utilization of Lung Cancer Screening Through Incorporating a Video-Based Educational Tool Into Smoking Cessation Counseling. Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 22:83-91. [PMID: 33436279 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality in high-risk patients, but most of those eligible are not referred for screening, and most eligible smokers are not aware of LCS. Smoking cessation counseling may be an opportune time to educate smokers about LCS. Here we investigate the effect of LCS educational information on LDCT utilization and smoking cessation in LCS-eligible patients receiving smoking cessation counseling. PATIENTS AND METHODS We randomized 1281 smokers aged 55-80 who underwent smoking cessation services to view a web-based educational video about LCS (n = 1026) or to receive usual care (n = 255). Outcomes included the utilization of chest computed tomographic (CT) scan during 6 months of follow-up, responses to survey questions, and patient-reported abstinence from smoking at 6 months. RESULTS One hundred forty-six participants (14%) watched the video. Overall, 87 participants (8.5%) in the intervention group underwent any chest CT and 37 (3.6%) underwent LDCT compared to 22 (8.6%) and 11 (4.3%) in the control group during the 6-month follow-up period (P = .94 and .59, respectively). Among participants who completed watching the video, 27 (18.5%) underwent any chest CT and 13 (8.9%) underwent LDCT, compared to 22 (8.6%) and 11 (4.3%) in controls during follow-up (P = .0037 and .062, respectively). There was no difference in abstinence from smoking between groups. CONCLUSION An LCS educational intervention may be effective in improving utilization of LDCT in eligible individuals who currently smoke at the time of smoking cessation counseling. Further research on the effect of LCS education in the context of smoking cessation counseling is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan J Raz
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, CA.
| | - Mohamed H Ismail
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Riverside, CA
| | - Eric C Haupt
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Virginia Sun
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Stacy Park
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Angel C Alem
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Michael K Gould
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Raz DJ, Ismail MH, Sun V, Park S, Alem AC, Haupt EC, Gould MK. Incorporating lung cancer screening education into tobacco cessation group counseling. Tob Prev Cessat 2020; 6:12. [PMID: 32548349 PMCID: PMC7291913 DOI: 10.18332/tpc/115166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality, yet few people who are eligible for LCS get screened. In the present study, we studied the feasibility of tobacco cessation counselors to inform about LCS during tobacco cessation group counseling. METHODS Four tobacco cessation counselors at two different facilities offering group tobacco cessation counseling were trained to administer an educational intervention about LCS. The intervention was administered to 25 participants during May 2019 who completed surveys that assessed how much the information provided helped with understanding various aspects of lung cancer screening including benefits, risks, eligibility criteria, and insurance coverage. The intervention also provided information on how to learn more about LCS and assessed the acceptability of the information. RESULTS The median score for understanding of all components of the intervention was 5 ('completely understand'). Most participants (92%) felt that the information provided about LCS was the right amount. Most participants (72%) were aged 55-80 years, the age range for LCS eligibility. Four participants (16%) reported undergoing LCS in the past. When we reanalyzed the subset of participants who reported no prior LCS, the results of surveys were similar. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that it is feasible to train tobacco cessation counselors to educate smokers, attending group tobacco cessation counseling classes, also about LCS. The education provided in this study was both understood and well received by the large majority of smokers surveyed. Further study is needed to understand the effect of LCS education on utilization of LDCT among smokers enrolled in tobacco cessation counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan J Raz
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, United States
| | - Mohamed H Ismail
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Kaiser Permanente, Riverside, United States
| | - Virginia Sun
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, United States
| | - Stacy Park
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, United States
| | - Angel C Alem
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, United States
| | - Eric C Haupt
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, United States
| | - Michael K Gould
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schiffelbein JE, Carluzzo KL, Hasson RM, Alford-Teaster JA, Imset I, Onega T. Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggested Interventions for Lung Cancer Screening Among a Rural Screening-Eligible Population. J Prim Care Community Health 2020; 11:2150132720930544. [PMID: 32506999 PMCID: PMC7278309 DOI: 10.1177/2150132720930544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Rural areas are disproportionally affected by lung cancer late-stage incidence and mortality. Lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended to find lung cancer early and reduce mortality, yet uptake is low. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the barriers to, facilitators of, and suggested interventions for increasing LCS among a rural screening-eligible population using a mixed methods concurrent embedded design study. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from rural-residing adults who met the eligibility criteria for LCS but who were not up-to-date with LCS recommendations. Study participants (n = 23) took part in 1 of 5 focus groups and completed a survey. Focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed, and coded through a mixed deductive and inductive approach. Survey data were used to enhance and clarify focus group results; these data were integrated in the design and during analysis, in accordance with the mixed methods concurrent embedded design approach. Results: Several key barriers to LCS were identified, including an overall lack of knowledge about LCS, not receiving information or recommendation from a health care provider, and lack of transportation. Key facilitators were receiving a provider recommendation and high motivation to know the screening results. Participants suggested that LCS uptake could be increased by addressing provider understanding and recommendation of LCS and conducting community outreach to promote LCS awareness and access. Conclusion: The results suggest that the rural screening-eligible population is generally receptive to LCS. Patient-level factors important to getting this population screened include knowledge, transportation, motivation to know their screening results, and receiving information or recommendation from a provider. Addressing these factors may be important to increase rural LCS uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna E. Schiffelbein
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | | | - Rian M. Hasson
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Jennifer A. Alford-Teaster
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Inger Imset
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Tracy Onega
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Draucker CB, Rawl SM, Vode E, Carter-Harris L. Understanding the decision to screen for lung cancer or not: A qualitative analysis. Health Expect 2019; 22:1314-1321. [PMID: 31560837 PMCID: PMC6882261 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although new screening programmes with low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer have been implemented throughout the United States, screening uptake remains low and screening‐eligible persons' decisions to screen or not remain poorly understood. Objective To describe how current and former long‐term smokers explain their decisions regarding participation in lung cancer screening. Design Phone interviews using a semi‐structured interview guide were conducted to ask screening‐eligible persons to describe their decisions regarding screening with LDCT. The interviews were transcribed and analysed with conventional content analytic techniques. Setting and participants A subsample of 40 participants (20 who had screened and 20 who had not) were drawn from the sample of a survey study whose participants were recruited by Facebook targeted advertisements. Results The sample was divided into the following five groups based on their decisions regarding lung cancer screening participation: Group 1: no intention to be screened, Group 2: no deliberate consideration but somewhat open to being screened, Group 3: deliberate consideration but no definitive decision to be screened, Group 4: intention to be screened and Group 5: had been screened. Reasons for screening participation decisions are described for each group. Across groups, data revealed that screening‐eligible persons have a number of misconceptions regarding LDCT, including that a scan is needed only if one is symptomatic or has not had a chest x‐ray. A physician recommendation was a key influence on decisions to screen. Discussion and conclusions Education initiatives aimed at providers and long‐term smokers regarding LDCT is needed. Quality patient/provider communication is most likely to improve screening rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan M Rawl
- Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana.,Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Emilee Vode
- Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Lisa Carter-Harris
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tseng TS, Gross T, Celestin MD, Dang W, Young L, Kao YH, Li M, Smith DL, Bok LR, Fuloria J, Moody-Thomas S. Knowledge and attitudes towards low dose computed tomography lung cancer screening and smoking among African Americans-a mixed method study. Transl Cancer Res 2019; 8:S431-S442. [PMID: 35117119 PMCID: PMC8797997 DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2019.04.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study is to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and smoking cessation needs for African Americans who receive low dose computed tomography (LDCT) in an effort to reduce the health burden of lung cancer. Methods A mixed method study was conducted among African Americans who received LDCT. Data were gathered using a self-administered questionnaire and structured in-depth interview. Descriptive statistics were used to provide summary information on knowledge, attitude and smoking behaviors. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data. The sample size for both the quantitative and qualitative approach was fifteen. Results The results showed that 73% of participants were male, the mean age was 61.8 (SD =4.6) years old, and 66.7% of participants had an income less than $20,000. Eighty percent had an education level of high school or below and 73.3% were overweight or obese. Smoking history was long (mean years =39 SD =14.9), but the number of cigarettes smoked per day was low (mean =9.2 SD =7.3), and 64% of the patients had a low nicotine dependence. Assessment of knowledge and attitudes towards LDCT revealed that participants had a moderate/lower knowledge score (mean =4.3 SD =2.6), and most had a positive attitude. All participants planned to quit smoking, with 73% planning to quit within the next 6 months. Similar findings were also observed in the qualitative analysis. Conclusions African Americans who receive LDCT lung cancer screening in this study have a moderate/lower knowledge score and positive attitude towards LDCT. Most were not heavy smokers and had a lower nicotine dependence. Understanding the factors associated with smoking cessation among at-risk African American smokers will help reduce disparities in lung cancer burden, and is important to improve health for medically underserved minority populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tung-Sung Tseng
- LSU Health New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Tyra Gross
- Xavier University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Michael D Celestin
- LSU Health New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Wendy Dang
- Xavier University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Lucretia Young
- LSU Health New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Yu-Hsiang Kao
- LSU Health New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Mirandy Li
- LSU Health New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - David L Smith
- LSU Health New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Leonard R Bok
- LSU Health New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Jyotsna Fuloria
- University Medical Center New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Sarah Moody-Thomas
- LSU Health New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|