1
|
Glicksman RM, Berlin A, Helou J, Loblaw A, Cheung P. FASTRACKing Our Understanding of Renal Function After Kidney Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 120:655-657. [PMID: 39326952 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Glicksman
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joelle Helou
- London Regional Cancer Program, Division of Radiation Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heger P, Rummel K, Watkins J. Durable Local Control With Preserved Renal Function for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Cryoablation-Refractory Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma. Cureus 2024; 16:e68864. [PMID: 39246631 PMCID: PMC11380458 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer, accounting for most renal cancers. Oligoprogressive RCC (OP-RCC) describes metastatic RCC wherein one or a few metastatic sites continue to progress, while the majority of metastatic sites are stable on systemic therapy. Treatment options for the primary site for OP-RCC include cytoreductive nephrectomy, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), or ablative techniques, although there is no currently agreed-upon standard for treatment. This report describes a 76-year-old male with OP-RCC who was treated with salvage SBRT after failing cytoablation therapy. A review of the current literature on SBRT as a treatment option for OP-RCC is presented and discussed. This case demonstrates that SBRT may be a viable salvage treatment option for patients with OP-RCC that provides good local disease control while preserving long-term renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parker Heger
- Surgery, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, USA
| | | | - John Watkins
- Radiation Oncology, Bismarck Cancer Center, Bismarck, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barbour AB, Upadhyay R, Anderson AC, Kutuk T, Kumar R, Wang SJ, Psutka SP, Fekrmandi F, Skalina KA, Bruynzeel AME, Correa RJM, Dal Pra A, Biancia CD, Hannan R, Louie A, Singh AK, Swaminath A, Tang C, Teh BS, Zaorsky NG, Lo SS, Siva S. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case-Based Radiosurgery Society Practice Guide. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00156-5. [PMID: 39019209 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
Traditionally, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was considered a radioresistant tumor, thereby limiting definitive radiation therapy management options. However, several recent studies have demonstrated that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can achieve high rates of local control for the treatment of primary RCC. In the setting of expanding use of SBRT for primary RCC, it is crucial to provide guidance on practical considerations such as patient selection, fractionation, target delineation, and response assessment. This is particularly important in challenging scenarios where a paucity of evidence exists, such as in patients with a solitary kidney, bulky tumors, or tumor thrombus. The Radiosurgery Society endorses this case-based guide to provide a practical framework for delivering SBRT to primary RCC, exemplified by 3 cases. This article explores topics of tumor size and dose fractionation, impact on renal function and treatment in the setting of a solitary kidney, and radiation's role in the management of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. Additionally, we review existing evidence and expert opinion on target delineation, advanced techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging guided SBRT, and SBRT response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Barbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - August C Anderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Tugce Kutuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Ritesh Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Shang-Jui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Fatemeh Fekrmandi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Karin A Skalina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rohann J M Correa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Cesar Della Biancia
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Alexander Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anurag K Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Shankar Siva
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tan VS, Correa RJM, Warner A, Ali M, Muacevic A, Ponsky L, Ellis RJ, Lo SS, Onishi H, Swaminath A, Suk Kwon Y, Morgan SC, Cury FL, Teh BS, Mahadevan A, Kaplan ID, Chu W, Hannan R, Staehler M, Zaorsky NG, Louie AV, Siva S. Long-term Renal Function Outcomes After Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma Including Patients with a Solitary Kidney: A Report from the International Radiosurgery Oncology Consortium of the Kidney. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00159-7. [PMID: 38987159 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Renal function preservation is particularly important following nonoperative treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) since patients are often older with medical comorbidities. Our objective was to report long-term renal function outcomes after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) including patients with a solitary kidney. METHODS Patients with primary RCC treated with SABR with ≥2 yr of follow-up at 12 International Radiosurgery Consortium for Kidney institutions were included. Renal function was measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS In total, 190 patients (56 with a solitary kidney) underwent SABR and were followed for a median of 5.0 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.4-6.8). In patients with a solitary kidney versus bilateral kidneys, pre-SABR eGFR (mean [standard deviation]) was 61.1 (23.2) versus 58.0 (22.3) ml/min (p = 0.32) and the median tumor size was 3.65 cm (IQR: 2.59-4.50 cm) versus 4.00 cm (IQR: 3.00-5.00 cm; p = 0.026). At 5 yr after SABR, eGFR decreased by -14.5 (7.6) and -13.3 (15.9) ml/min (p = 0.67), respectively, and there were similar rates of post-SABR dialysis (3.6% [n = 2/56] vs 3.7% [n = 5/134]). A multivariable analysis demonstrated that increasing tumor size (odds ratio [OR] per 1 cm: 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-2.16, p = 0.0055) and baseline eGFR (OR per 10 ml/min: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.02-1.66, p = 0.034) were associated with an eGFR decline of ≥15 ml/min at 1 yr. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS With long-term follow-up after SABR, kidney function decline remains moderate, with no observed difference between patients with a solitary kidney and bilateral kidneys. Tumor size and baseline eGFR are dominant factors predictive of long-term renal function decline. PATIENT SUMMARY With long-term follow-up, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) yields moderate long-term renal function decline and low dialysis rates even in patients with a solitary kidney. SABR thus represents a promising noninvasive, nephron-sparing option for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian S Tan
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Muhammad Ali
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Lee Ponsky
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rodney J Ellis
- GenesisCare USA, Fort Myers, FL, USA; Northeast Ohio Medical University Rootstown, OH, USA
| | - Simon S Lo
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Anand Swaminath
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Young Suk Kwon
- University of Texas - Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Fabio L Cury
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Bin S Teh
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anand Mahadevan
- NYU Langone Health - Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - William Chu
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- University of Texas - Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alexander V Louie
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bentahila R, Bensalah K, Benziane-Ouaritini N, Barthelemy P, Rioux-Leclerc N, Correas JM, Belhomme S, Bigot P, Sargos P. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: A review on behalf of the CC-AFU. THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102660. [PMID: 38823486 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is on the rise among individuals aged 70 and older. While the gold standard for treatment remains surgical resection, some elderly and frail patients with comorbidities are not eligible for this procedure. In selected cases, percutaneous thermal ablation, such as cryotherapy, microwave and radiofrequency, offers less invasive options. General anesthesia is sometimes necessary for such treatments, but most of the procedures can be conducted using mild or deep conscious sedation. This approach is preferably recommended for small cT1a tumors situated at a distance from the renal hilum and/or ureter. Active surveillance remains an alternative in the case of small low grade RCC although it may induce anxiety in certain patients. Recent research has highlighted the potentials of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) as a noninvasive, well-tolerated, and effective treatment for small renal tumors. This narrative review aims to explore recent advances in SABR for localized RCC, including appropriate patient selection, treatment modalities and administration, as well as efficacy and tolerance assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a literature review using the terms [kidney cancer], [renal cell carcinoma], [stereotactic radiotherapy], [SBRT], and [SABR] in the Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases, focusing on prospective and relevant retrospective studies published in English. RESULTS Studies report local control rates ranging from 70% to 100% with SABR, highlighting its efficacy in treating RCC. The decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is approximately -5 to -17mL/min over the years following SABR. Common toxicities are rare, primarily CTCAE grade 1, include fatigue, nausea, chest or back pain, diarrhea, or gastritis. CONCLUSION Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) may be considered as a viable option for patients with localized RCC who are not suitable candidates for surgery with a high local control rate and a favorable safety profile. This approach should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting and results from ongoing clinical trials are awaited. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Bentahila
- Department of radiotherapy, Bergonié Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Urology Department, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | | | - Philippe Barthelemy
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | - Sarah Belhomme
- Department of Medical Physic, Bergonié Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Pierre Bigot
- Urology Department, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of radiotherapy, Bergonié Institute, Bordeaux, France; Amethyst Radiotherapy Group, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nguyen NP, Chirila ME, Page BR, Vinh-Hung V, Gorobets O, Mohammadianpanah M, Giap H, Arenas M, Bonet M, Lara PC, Kim L, Dutheil F, Lehrman D, Montes LZ, Tlili G, Dahbi Z, Loganadane G, Blanco SC, Bose S, Natoli E, Li E, Mallum A, Morganti AG. Immunotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy for older patients with non-metastatic renal cancer unfit for surgery or decline nephrectomy: practical proposal by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1391464. [PMID: 38854736 PMCID: PMC11162108 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1391464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
The standard of care for non-metastatic renal cancer is surgical resection followed by adjuvant therapy for those at high risk for recurrences. However, for older patients, surgery may not be an option due to the high risk of complications which may result in death. In the past renal cancer was considered to be radio-resistant, and required a higher dose of radiation leading to excessive complications secondary to damage of the normal organs surrounding the cancer. Advances in radiotherapy technique such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has led to the delivery of a tumoricidal dose of radiation with minimal damage to the normal tissue. Excellent local control and survival have been reported for selective patients with small tumors following SBRT. However, for patients with poor prognostic factors such as large tumor size and aggressive histology, there was a higher rate of loco-regional recurrences and distant metastases. Those tumors frequently carry program death ligand 1 (PD-L1) which makes them an ideal target for immunotherapy with check point inhibitors (CPI). Given the synergy between radiotherapy and immunotherapy, we propose an algorithm combining CPI and SBRT for older patients with non-metastatic renal cancer who are not candidates for surgical resection or decline nephrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nam P. Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Monica-Emilia Chirila
- Department of Clinical Development, MVision AI, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amethyst Radiotherapy Centre, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Brandi R. Page
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Vincent Vinh-Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Public du Contentin, Cherbourg-en-Contentin, France
| | - Olena Gorobets
- Department of Oral Surgery, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France, France
| | - Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
- Colorectal Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Huan Giap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Meritxell Arenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant Joan de Reus University Hospital, University of Rovira, I Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Marta Bonet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain
| | - Pedro Carlos Lara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fernando Pessoria Canarias Las Palmas University, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Lyndon Kim
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Fabien Dutheil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinique Sainte Clotilde, Saint-Denis, Reunion Island, France
| | - David Lehrman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group, Washington, DC, United States
| | | | - Ghassen Tlili
- Department of Urology, Sahloul University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Zineb Dahbi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences, Casablanca, Morocco
| | | | - Sergio Calleja Blanco
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Satya Bose
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Elena Natoli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studorium, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eric Li
- Department of Pathology, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Abba Mallum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Alessio G. Morganti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studorium, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang RS, Chow R, Chopade P, Mihalache A, Hasan A, Boldt G, Glicksman R, Simone CB, Lock M, Raman S. Dose-response of localized renal cell carcinoma after stereotactic body radiation therapy: A meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110216. [PMID: 38462092 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment option for primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly in patients who are unsuitable for surgery. The aim of this review is to assess the effect of increasing the biologically equivalent dose (BED) via various radiation fractionation regimens on clinical outcomes. METHODS A literature search was conducted in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to October 2023. Studies reporting on patients with localized RCC receiving SBRT were included to determine its effectiveness on local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival. A random effects model was used to meta-regress clinical outcomes relative to the BED for each study and heterogeneity was assessed by I2. RESULTS A total of 724 patients with RCC from 22 studies were included, with a mean age of 72.7 years (range: 44.0-81.0). Local control was excellent with an estimate of 99 % (95 %CI: 97-100 %, I2 = 19 %), 98 % (95 %CI: 96-99 %, I2 = 8 %), and 94 % (95 %CI: 90-97 %, I2 = 11 %) at one year, two years, and five years respectively. No definitive association between increasing BED and local control, progression-free survival and overall survival was observed. No publication bias was observed. CONCLUSIONS A significant dose response relationship between oncological outcomes and was not identified, and excellent local control outcomes were observed at the full range of doses. Until new evidence points otherwise, we support current recommendations against routine dose escalation beyond 25-26 Gy in one fraction or 42-48 Gy in three fractions, and to consider de-escalation or compromising target coverage if required to achieve safe organ at risk doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S Huang
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ronald Chow
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada; New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pradnya Chopade
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew Mihalache
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Asad Hasan
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gabriel Boldt
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel Glicksman
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Michael Lock
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Siva S, Louie AV, Kotecha R, Barber MN, Ali M, Zhang Z, Guckenberger M, Kim MS, Scorsetti M, Tree AC, Slotman BJ, Sahgal A, Lo SS. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and practice guideline from the International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS). Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e18-e28. [PMID: 38181809 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00513-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
Surgery is the standard of care for patients with primary renal cell carcinoma. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a novel alternative for patients who are medically inoperable, technically high risk, or who decline surgery. Evidence for using SBRT in the primary renal cell carcinoma setting is growing, including several rigorously conducted prospective clinical trials. This systematic review was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of SBRT for primary renal cell carcinoma. Review results then formed the basis for the practice guidelines described, on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society. 3972 publications were screened and 36 studies (822 patients) were included in the analysis. Median local control rate was 94·1% (range 70·0-100), 5-year progression-free survival was 80·5% (95% CI 72-92), and 5-year overall survival was 77·2% (95% CI 65-89). These practice guidelines addressed four key clinical questions. First, the optimal dose fractionation was 25-26 Gy in one fraction, or 42-48 Gy in three fractions for larger tumours. Second, routine post-treatment biopsy is not recommended as it is not predictive of patient outcome. Third, SBRT for primary renal cell carcinoma in a solitary kidney is safe and effective. Finally, guidelines for post-treatment follow-up are described, which include cross-axial imaging of the abdomen including both kidneys, adrenals, and surveillance of the chest initially every 6 months. This systematic review and practice guideline support the practice of SBRT for primary renal cell carcinoma as a safe and effective standard treatment option. Randomised trials with surgery and invasive ablative therapies are needed to further define best practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Melissa N Barber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Muhammad Ali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Zhenwei Zhang
- Center for Advanced Analytics, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy Department, IRCCS-Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele-Milan, Italy
| | - Alison C Tree
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Ben J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abancourt L, Le Guévelou J, Taillez A, Vu A, de Crevoisier R, Supiot S, Hennequin C, Chapet O, Blanchard P, Mirabel X, Lartigau É, Pasquier D. [Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary kidney cancer]. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:568-572. [PMID: 37543493 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of primary renal cancer is increasing, particularly in elderly patients who may have comorbidities and/or a surgical contraindications. Stereotactic body radiotherapy has primarily been evaluated retrospectively to date. The most commonly used dose schedules are 40Gy in five fractions, 42Gy in three fractions, and 26Gy in one fraction. The results in terms of local control and toxicity are very encouraging. The advantages of stereotactic body radiotherapy compared to thermal ablative treatments are its non-invasive nature, absence of general anesthesia, ability to treat larger lesions, and those close to the renal hilum. Prospective evaluations are still necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Abancourt
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, Lille, France
| | - J Le Guévelou
- Radiotherapy department, centre régional de lutte contre le cancer Eugène-Marquis, 35042 Rennes, France
| | - A Taillez
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, Lille, France
| | - A Vu
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, Lille, France
| | - R de Crevoisier
- Radiotherapy department, centre régional de lutte contre le cancer Eugène-Marquis, 35042 Rennes, France
| | - S Supiot
- Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - C Hennequin
- Service de cancérologie-radiothérapie, hôpital Saint-Louis, université de Paris, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - O Chapet
- Département of de radiothérapie oncologie, centre hospitalier universitaire Lyon Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France; Université de Lyon, 69000 Lyon, France
| | - P Blanchard
- Département de radiothérapie oncologique, Gustave-Roussy cancer campus, université Paris-Saclay, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - X Mirabel
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, Lille, France
| | - É Lartigau
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, Lille, France; Univ. Lille & CNRS CRIStAL UMR 9189, Lille, France
| | - D Pasquier
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, Lille, France; Univ. Lille & CNRS CRIStAL UMR 9189, Lille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Barbour AB, Kirste S, Grosu AL, Siva S, Louie AV, Onishi H, Swaminath A, Teh BS, Psutka SP, Weg ES, Chen JJ, Zeng J, Gore JL, Hall E, Liao JJ, Correa RJM, Lo SS. The Judicious Use of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in the Primary Management of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3672. [PMID: 37509333 PMCID: PMC10377531 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Localized renal cell carcinoma is primarily managed surgically, but this disease commonly presents in highly comorbid patients who are poor operative candidates. Less invasive techniques, such as cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation, are effective, but require percutaneous or laparoscopic access, while generally being limited to cT1a tumors without proximity to the renal pelvis or ureter. Active surveillance is another management option for small renal masses, but many patients desire treatment or are poor candidates for active surveillance. For poor surgical candidates, a growing body of evidence supports stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as a safe and effective non-invasive treatment modality. For example, a recent multi-institution individual patient data meta-analysis of 190 patients managed with SABR estimated a 5.5% five-year cumulative incidence of local failure with one patient experiencing grade 4 toxicity, and no other grade ≥3 toxic events. Here, we discuss the recent developments in SABR for the management of localized renal cell carcinoma, highlighting key concepts of appropriate patient selection, treatment design, treatment delivery, and response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Barbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, 79085 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Liga Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, 79085 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Shankar Siva
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Hiroshi Onishi
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Emily S Weg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jonathan J Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jing Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Evan Hall
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jay J Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Rohann J M Correa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|