Bone mineral density in adolescents using norethisterone enanthate, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate or combined oral contraceptives for contraception

U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024

The 2024 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) comprises recommendations for the use of specific contraceptive methods by persons who have certain characteristics or medical conditions. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and a meeting with national experts in Atlanta, Georgia, during January 25-27, 2023. The information in this report replaces the 2016 U.S. MEC (CDC. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR 2016:65[No. RR-3]:1-103). Notable updates include 1) the addition of recommendations for persons with chronic kidney disease; 2) revisions to the recommendations for persons with certain characteristics or medical conditions (i.e., breastfeeding, postpartum, postabortion, obesity, surgery, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism with or without anticoagulant therapy, thrombophilia, superficial venous thrombosis, valvular heart disease, peripartum cardiomyopathy, systemic lupus erythematosus, high risk for HIV infection, cirrhosis, liver tumor, sickle cell disease, solid organ transplantation, and drug interactions with antiretrovirals used for prevention or treatment of HIV infection); and 3) inclusion of new contraceptive methods, including new doses or formulations of combined oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches, vaginal rings, progestin-only pills, levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, and vaginal pH modulator. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of evidence-based clinical practice guidance for health care providers. The goals of these recommendations are to remove unnecessary medical barriers to accessing and using contraception and to support the provision of person-centered contraceptive counseling and services in a noncoercive manner. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking contraceptive services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients; when needed, patients should seek advice from their health care providers about contraceptive use.

Hormonal contraceptive use, bone density and biochemical markers of bone metabolism in British Army recruits

INTRODUCTION

Hormonal contraceptive use might impair bone health and increase the risk of stress fracture by decreasing endogenous oestrogen production, a central regulator of bone metabolism. This cross-sectional study investigated bone density and biochemical markers of bone metabolism in women taking hormonal contraceptives on entry to basic military training.

METHODS

Forty-five female British Army recruits had biochemical markers of bone metabolism, areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and tibial speed of sound (tSOS) measured at the start of basic military training. Participants were compared by their method of hormonal contraception: no hormonal contraception (NONE), combined contraceptive pill (CP) or depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) (20±2.8 years, 1.64±0.63 m, 61.7±6.2 kg).

RESULTS

aBMD was not different between groups (p≥0.204), but tSOS was higher in NONE (3%, p=0.014) when compared with DMPA users. Beta C-terminal telopeptide was higher in NONE (45%, p=0.037) and DMPA users (90%, p=0.003) compared with CP users. Procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide was higher in DMPA users compared with NONE (43%, p=0.045) and CP users (127%, p=0.001), and higher in NONE compared with CP users (59%, p=0.014). Bone alkaline phosphatase was higher in DMPA users compared with CP users (56%, p=0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

DMPA use was associated with increased bone turnover and decreased cortical bone integrity of the tibia. Lower cortical bone integrity in DMPA users was possibly mediated by increased intracortical remodelling, but trabecular bone was not affected by contraceptive use.

Combined oral contraceptives' influence on weight, body composition, height, and bone mineral density in girls younger than 18 years: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) are increasingly used by adolescents. The aim of this review is to investigate the evidence regarding COCs' influence on weight, height and bone mineral density (BMD) in girls younger than 18 years.

METHOD

Systematic literature search using PubMed/Medline and Scopus (January 1990-February 2012) on COCs for girls under 18 years of age and the possible influence on body parameters. MeSH terms: Oral contraception; Adolescent; Weight; Body composition; Height; Bone mineral density.

RESULTS

There is no evidence that COCs induce weight gain in girls younger than 18 years. Obese girls are not at higher risk of gaining weight. COCs do not cause changes in body fat and lean mass beyond the changes caused by natural development. Moreover, growth and stature are unaffected. Few studies indicate that COCs have a negative impact on BMD, but the evidence is presently too limited for definite conclusions.

CONCLUSION

Studies in young users are few. Presently, there are no indications of a negative impact of COCs on weight, body composition or height. Lesser increases in BMD cannot be excluded. As the demand for COCs is increasing among the youngest girls, there is a need for prospective studies addressing this issue.

Family planning: today and in the future

This review covers the state of contraceptive development noting new entries in the clinic (mainly steroidal and different delivery methods) and novel leads for nonsteroidal female- and male-methods in the pipeline. The time taken to market and the absence of partnerships with industry are stressed as major factors for the slow progress in their development.

Prospective study of weight change in new adolescent users of DMPA, NET-EN, COCs, nonusers and discontinuers of hormonal contraception

BACKGROUND

Weight gain is commonly reported as a side effect of hormonal contraception and can lead to method discontinuation or reluctance to initiate the method. The purpose of this study was to investigate weight change in adolescent (aged 15-19 years) users of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN), combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and discontinuers of these methods as compared to nonusers of hormonal contraception.

STUDY DESIGN

This longitudinal study recruited initiators of DMPA (n=115), NET-EN (n=115), COCs (n=116) and nonusers of contraception (n=144). Participants were followed up for 4-5 years, and details of current contraceptive method, including switching, discontinuing and/or starting hormonal methods were documented at each 6-monthly visit. Women were classified according to their contraceptive histories on completion of the study, and injectable users were combined into one group for analysis. Height, weight and self-reported dieting were recorded at each visit.

RESULTS

There was no difference in mean age or weight between the groups at baseline. Women using DMPA or NET-EN throughout, or switching between the two, had gained an average of 6.2 kg compared to average increases of 2.3 kg in the COC group, 2.8 kg in nonusers and 2.8 kg among discontinued users of any method (p=.02). There was no evidence of a difference in weight gain between women classified as nonobese or classified as overweight/obese in any of the four study groups at baseline.

CONCLUSION

There is fairly strong evidence that adolescent contraceptive hormonal injectable users appear to gain more weight than COC users, discontinuers and nonusers of contraception.

Endometriosis: current therapies and new pharmacological developments

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory condition that is responsive to management with steroids. The establishment of a steady hormonal environment and inhibition of ovulation can temporarily suppress ectopic implants and reduce inflammation as well as associated pain symptoms. In terms of pharmacological management, the currently available agents are not curative, and treatment often needs to be continued for years or until pregnancy is desired. Similar efficacy has been observed from the various therapies that have been investigated for endometriosis. Accordingly, combined oral contraceptives and progestins, based on their favourable safety profile, tolerability and cost, should be considered as first-line options, as an alternative to surgery and for post-operative adjuvant use. In situations where progestins and oral contraceptives prove ineffective, are poorly tolerated or are contraindicated, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues, danazol or gestrinone may be used. Future therapeutic options for managing endometriosis must compare favourably against existing agents before they can be considered for inclusion into current practice. Finally, as reproductive prognosis is not ameliorated by medical treatment, it is not indicated for women seeking conception.

Bone mineral density in young women aged 19-24 after 4-5 years of exclusive and mixed use of hormonal contraception

BACKGROUND

Use of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) and low-dose combined oral contraceptives (COCs) has been associated with loss of bone mineral density (BMD) in adolescents. However, the effect of using a combination of these methods over time in this age group is limited. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate BMD in young women (aged 19-24 years) with a history of mixed hormonal contraceptive use.

STUDY DESIGN

BMD was measured at the spine, hip and femoral neck using dual X-ray absorptiometry. Women were classified into three groups: (1) injectable users (DMPA, NET-EN or both) (n=40), (2) mixed COC and injectable users (n=13) and (3) non-user control (n=41).

RESULTS

Women in the injectables-only user group were found to have lower BMDs compared to the non-user group at all three sites, and there was evidence of a difference in BMD between these two groups at the spine after adjusting for body mass index (p=.042), hip (p=.025) and femoral neck (p=.023). The mixed COC/injectable user group BMD values were lower than those for controls; however, there was no evidence of a significant difference between this group and the non-user group at any of the three sites.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that BMD is lower in long-term injectable users but not when women have mixed injectable and COC use.

Bone mineral density in a cohort of adolescents during use of norethisterone enanthate, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate or combined oral contraceptives and after discontinuation of norethisterone enanthate

BACKGROUND

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) and combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have been shown to have a negative effect on bone mineral density (BMD) in adolescents. The aim of this study was to investigate BMD in 15- to 19-year-old new users of DMPA, NET-EN and COCs.

STUDY DESIGN

This 5-year longitudinal study followed up new users of DMPA (n=115), NET-EN (n=115) and COCs (n=116) and 144 nonuser controls. BMD was measured at the distal radius using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

BMD increased in all groups (annual percent increase: nonusers, 1.49%; DMPA, 1.39%; NET-EN, 1.03%; COCs, 0.84%) during follow-up (p<.001). There was evidence for lower BMD increases per annum in NET-EN (p=.050) and COC (p=.010) users compared to nonusers but no difference between DMPA and nonusers (p=.76). In 14 NET-EN discontinuers, an overall reduction of 0.61% per year BMD was followed upon cessation by an increase of 0.69% per year (p=.066).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that BMD increases in adolescents may be less in NET-EN and COC users; however, recovery of BMD in NET-EN users was found in the small sample of adolescents followed post-discontinuation.

Controversies in contraception

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

New research is constantly being published regarding hormonal contraceptives and bone health, migraine headaches, thrombosis risk, hypertension, weight gain, and obesity, as well as emergency contraception. At times, these studies can be clarifying, but they can also raise new controversies and questions. It is important for providers to be aware of the emerging issues regarding contraceptive care for adolescent patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research suggests that Depo-Provera (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; Pfizer, New York City, New York, USA) and, perhaps, low-dose oral contraceptive pills can have adverse effects on adolescent bone health, although the data demonstrating reversibility of bone loss after discontinuation of these contraceptives are reassuring. Additionally, estrogen-containing contraceptives pose risks for patients, including the onset of or exacerbation of migraine headaches, venous thromboembolism, and hypertension. Depo-Provera has been implicated in weight gain, especially in girls who are already overweight. Obesity may decrease the efficacy of some hormonal contraceptives. Finally, the mechanism of action of emergency contraception is still unknown, although studies continue to suggest that it has primarily preovulatory, not postovulatory, effects.

SUMMARY

Adolescent health providers need to be aware of the new research and controversies in contraceptive care in order to counsel and care for patients effectively.

As the world grows: contraception in the 21st century

Contraceptives that are readily available and acceptable are required in many poorer countries to reduce population growth and in all countries to prevent maternal morbidity and mortality arising from unintended pregnancies. Most available methods use hormonal steroids or are variations of barrier methods. Reports from several fora over the last 12 years have emphasized the number of unwanted pregnancies and resultant abortions, which indicate an unmet need for safe, acceptable, and inexpensive contraceptive methods. This unmet need can be assuaged, in part, by development of new nonhormonal contraceptive methods. This Review addresses the contribution that the "omic" revolution can make to the identification of novel contraceptive targets, as well as the progress that has been made for different target molecules under development.