Psychiatric disability and clinical decision making: The impact of judgment error and bias

Übersichtsarbeiten / Review Articles. Voreingenommenheiten und Wahrnehmungsverzerrungen (Bias) in der psychiatrisch-psychotherapeutischen Versorgung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit intellektueller Beeinträchtigung

Bias in Mental Health Care of Children and Adolescents with Intellectual Disabilities Implicit and explicit bias and distortions of perception are partly responsible for the unequal and significantly deficient psychotherapeutic and psychiatric care situation for children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities and additional behavioral problems. The extent to which these biases influence misdiagnoses and treatment errors, refusals and exclusions from professional care, and grossly hostile rejections of people with disabilities requires empirical evidence (Bartig et al., 2021). The fact that all forms occur - probably to a considerable extent - contradicts the ethical principles of the medical and psychotherapeutic profession. In order to avoid misdiagnosis and treatment as a result of bias, this must be openly addressed. Selfawareness, supervision and second views, the concept of working diagnosis and, above all, the full application of child and adolescent psychiatric standards help to reduce bias.

Bias in assessment of co-occurring mental disorder in individuals with intellectual disabilities: Theoretical perspectives and implications for clinical practice

Influence from bias is unavoidable in clinical decision-making, and mental health assessment seems particularly vulnerable. Individuals with intellectual disabilities have increased risk of developing co-occurring mental disorder. Due to the inherent difficulties associated with intellectual disabilities, assessment of mental health in this population often relies on a different set of strategies, and it is unclear how these may affect risk of bias. In this theoretical paper, we apply recent conceptualisations of bias in clinical decision-making to the specific challenges and strategies in mental health assessment in intellectual disabilities. We suggest that clinical decision-making in these assessments is particularly vulnerable to bias, including sources of bias present in mental health assessment in the general population, as well as potential sources of bias which may be specific to assessments in this population. It follows that to manage potential bias, triangulating information from multi-informant, multi-method, interdisciplinary assessment strategies is likely to be necessary.

Identifying Examiner-Related Threats to Validity in the Forensic Assessment of Disability

As the number of disability claims increases, so does the demand for forensic disability evaluations. However, an examiner's lack of knowledge and understanding of the nature and nuances of disability evaluations can threaten the validity of these evaluations. Although many threats to validity are outside the control of the examiner, this article identifies eight examiner-related threats to validity in terms of conceptual errors, errors in data collection, and inferential errors. Following this, six suggestions for reducing such threats are presented.

Does intuition have a role in psychiatric diagnosis?

Psychiatric diagnosis is invariably guided by self-report. When such self-report is questioned, reliance on formalized testing predominates. The situation is less certain, however, when such methods and clinical "feel", or intuition, conflict. While many argue for the supremacy of actuarial methods, fields such as Management have increasingly emphasized the importance of intuition; Psychiatry, although with few objective tests and reliance on the clinical encounter, offers surprisingly few answers. We explore here the use of intuition in decision-making through a case example and suggest that it is not inferior to other diagnostic methods: intuition should be used to suggest, guide, and modify psychiatric diagnosis. Mostly, there is a need for greater discussion among Psychiatrists including consideration to the clinical, legal, and ethical implications of the use of intuition in psychiatric decision-making.