1
|
Tabashy R, Darwish A, Ibrahim A, Gad El-Mola M. Modified percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy technique without endoscopic or nasogastric access. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-019-0086-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (MPRG) technique under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance without endoscopic or nasogastric access.
Results
The study included 24 patients: 10 males and 14 females whose ages ranged from 44 to 80 years old. Ten patients had esophageal cancer and 14 patients had neck cancer. Technical success was achieved in 23 out of the 25 procedures (92%). Two procedures failed (8%) and were converted to the conventional technique by using the nasogastric tube. No major complications were reported. Minor complications were observed in 5 patients (20%): intraperitoneal air and contrast leakage in 4 patients and focal mucosal dissection by the contrast in 1 patient.
Conclusion
The MPRG has high technical success rate, is safe with no major complications, and is most feasible when endoscopic or nasogastric access cannot be performed.
Collapse
|
2
|
Gastrostomy in head and neck cancer: current literature, controversies and research. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 23:162-70. [PMID: 25692626 DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article explores the literature on the role of gastrostomy tube feeding use in the management of head and neck cancer, with special attention to its indications, timing of insertion, advantages, complications and quality of life issues. RECENT FINDINGS The current guidelines in place across different countries and two ongoing randomized controlled trials are discussed in detail, and placed in the context of current evidence. SUMMARY There remains a lack of consensus about when and which enteral feeding routes (gastrostomy or nasogastric tube) should be used and controversy about the long-term effects on swallowing function as well as quality of life for patients. Local guidelines should be used or generated to guide practice or patients enrolled into existing trials until higher level evidence is generated.
Collapse
|
3
|
Richioud B, Louazon T, Beji H, Bertrand A, Roux P, Kalenderian AC, Cuinet M, Pilleul F, Marec-Bérard P. De novo radiologic placement of button gastrostomy: a feasibility study in children with cancer. Pediatr Radiol 2015. [PMID: 26209960 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-015-3426-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary placement of percutaneous radiologic button gastrostomy has been successfully performed in adults but research is lacking as to its success in children during cancer treatment. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and effectiveness of such treatment at a single center. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a 3-year retrospective feasibility study reporting on placement procedure, feeding plan, acute complications and effectiveness of this technique based on the evolution of the weight and weight-to-height during a period of 3 months. RESULTS Eleven gastrostomies were performed in 11 children and young adults (3-20 years old) during oncological treatment. No major complications occurred. Two patients experienced minor side effects -- local leakage and granulation tissue formation -- both easily treated. In all cases, enteral feeding started within 24 h following the button placement. The patients were able to go home within 72 h. After 1 month, 64% (7/11) had gained weight, 18% (2/11) had maintained weight and 9% (1/11) had lost weight. After 3 months, 73% (8/11) had gained weight and 9% (1/11) had lost weight. CONCLUSION The procedure and devices were well tolerated and mostly effective in our cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Richioud
- Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69008, Lyon, France.
| | - Typhaine Louazon
- Pediatric Oncology, Institut d'Hématologie et d'Oncologie Pédiatrique, Lyon, France
| | - Hedi Beji
- Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Amandine Bertrand
- Pediatric Oncology, Institut d'Hématologie et d'Oncologie Pédiatrique, Lyon, France
| | - Pascale Roux
- Pediatric Oncology, Institut d'Hématologie et d'Oncologie Pédiatrique, Lyon, France
| | | | - Marie Cuinet
- Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Frank Pilleul
- Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Perrine Marec-Bérard
- Pediatric Oncology, Institut d'Hématologie et d'Oncologie Pédiatrique, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bernstein OA, Campbell J, Rajan DK, Kachura JR, Simons ME, Beecroft JR, Jaskolka JD, Ringash J, Ho CS, Tan KT. Randomized Trial Comparing Radiologic Pigtail Gastrostomy and Peroral Image-Guided Gastrostomy: Intra- and Postprocedural Pain, Radiation Exposure, Complications, and Quality of Life. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26:1680-6; quiz 1686. [PMID: 26316137 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Revised: 06/12/2015] [Accepted: 07/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To prospectively compare radiologically created pigtail gastrostomy (PG), in which the tube is inserted directly through the abdominal wall, versus peroral image-guided gastrostomy (POG), in which the tube is inserted through the mouth. Pain profiles (primary outcome measure), fluoroscopy times, total room times, technical success, complications, and quality of life (QOL) were measured. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty patients were prospectively randomized to receive 14-F PG or 20-F POG tubes. All patients received prophylactically created gastrostomies before radiation therapy for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma. Patients receiving palliative treatment were excluded, as were those with established pharyngeal obstruction. Pain was measured by numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for 6 weeks after the procedure and by intraprocedural fentanyl and midazolam doses and postprocedural 24-h morphine doses. Fluoroscopy times, total room times, technical success, complications up to 6 months, and gastrostomy-related QOL (using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Enteral Feeding questionnaire) were determined. RESULTS Fifty-six patients underwent the randomized procedure. The POG group required significantly higher intraprocedural midazolam and fentanyl doses (mean, 1.2 mg and 67 μg, respectively, for PG vs 1.9 mg and 105 μg for POG; P < .001) and had significantly longer fluoroscopy times (mean, 1.3 min for PG vs 4.8 min for POG; P < .0001). NRS scores, morphine doses, total room times, technical success, complication rates, and QOL did not differ significantly between groups. The one major complication, a misplaced PG in the peritoneal cavity, followed a technical failure of POG creation. CONCLUSIONS Despite the differences in insertion technique and tube caliber, the measured outcomes of POG and PG are comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ondina A Bernstein
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Jennifer Campbell
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dheeraj K Rajan
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John R Kachura
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin E Simons
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Robert Beecroft
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey D Jaskolka
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jolie Ringash
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia S Ho
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kong Teng Tan
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McAllister P, MacIver C, Wales C, McMahon J, Devine J, McHattie G, Makubate B. Gastrostomy insertion in head and neck cancer patients: a 3 year review of insertion method and complication rates. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 51:714-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2013] [Accepted: 07/17/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|