Acute mesenteric ischaemia: imaging and intervention

Irreversible Transmural Intestinal Necrosis in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: Retrospective Cohort Study from a High-Volume Hospital

Background: Owing to the low incidence rate and nonspecific symptoms of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI), the identification and prediction of irreversible transmural intestinal necrosis (ITIN) and extensive bowel resection (≥100 cm) (EBR) are difficult and critical. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for ITIN and EBR in patients with AMI. Methods: The clinical data of 254 AMI patients were retrospectively analyzed. Furthermore, the incidence of ITIN and EBR were set as dependent variables, and relevant risk factors were screened using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The comparisons of surgical characteristics and postoperative recovery outcomes between the EBR and control group were also conducted. Results: The presence of hemorrhagic (odds ratio [OR] = 28.356, P < .001) or other types ascites (OR = 13.051, P = .003), peritonitis (OR = 8.463, P = .005), intestinal diameter >2.35 cm (OR = 5.493, P = .020), and serum creatinine (CREA) >95 μmol/L (OR = 4.866, P = .048) were identified as independent risk factors for ITIN in patients with AMI. In addition, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) >15 mg/L (OR = 38.023, P = .006), and CREA >100 μmol/L (OR = 6.248, P = .035) were proved to be independently associated with EBR for ITIN cases. Compared to the control group, EBR significantly increased the likelihood of requiring enterostomy (P = .001), blood transfusion (P = .002), and transfer to intensive care unit (P = .016), while also prolonging the recovery time for intestinal function (P = .014). Conclusions: The presence of ascites, peritonitis, intestinal diameter >2.35 cm, and serum CREA >95 μmol/L were independently correlated with ITIN for AMI cases, while serum CRP >15 mg/L and CREA >100 μmol/L independently increased the risk of EBR.

Acute management of mesenteric emergencies: Tailoring the solution to the problem

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) constitutes a life-threatening problem that can result in death, multiorgan failure, and severe nutritional disability. Although AMI is a rare cause of acute abdominal emergencies, ranging between 1 and 2 individuals per 10,000, the morbidity and mortality rates are high. Arterial embolic etiology composes nearly one-half of AMIs, with a sudden onset of severe abdominal pain considered the most common symptom. Arterial thrombosis is the second most common cause of AMI, which presents similarly to arterial embolic AMI, although often more severe due to anatomic differences. Veno-occlusive causes of AMI are the third most common and are associated with an insidious onset of vague abdominal pain. Each patient is unique, and the treatment plan should be tailored to their individual needs. This may include considering the patient's age, comorbidities, and overall health, as well as their preferences and personal circumstances. A multidisciplinary approach involving specialists from different fields, such as surgeons, interventional radiologists, and intensivists, is recommended for the best possible outcome. Potential challenges in tailoring an optimal treatment plan for AMI may include delayed diagnosis, limited availability of specialized care, or patient factors that make some interventions less feasible. Addressing these challenges requires a proactive and collaborative approach, with regular review and adjustment of the treatment plan as needed to ensure the best possible outcome for each patient.

High risk and low prevalence diseases: Mesenteric ischemia

INTRODUCTION

Mesenteric ischemia is a rare, frequently misdiagnosed, serious condition that carries with it a high rate of morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

This review highlights the pearls and pitfalls of mesenteric ischemia, including presentation, diagnosis, and management in the emergency department (ED) based on current evidence.

DISCUSSION

Mesenteric ischemia is an abdominal vascular emergency that includes superior mesenteric arterial embolism, arterial thrombosis, venous mesenteric ischemia, and non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia. It is associated with a variety of risk factors including older age, cardiovascular disease, hypercoagulable state, and end-stage renal disease. The presentation depends on the underlying pathophysiology. While arterial embolic disease may present with sudden, severe pain, the early stages of the disease and other forms can present with vague symptoms, including generalized abdominal pain, weight loss, vomiting, and diarrhea. Laboratory testing can suggest the disease with leukocytosis and elevated lactate, but normal values should not be used to exclude the diagnosis. The imaging modality of choice is triple phase computed tomography with non-contrast, arterial, and delayed phases. The initial ED management includes fluid resuscitation, symptomatic therapy, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and anticoagulation. Emergent consultation with a multidisciplinary team including diagnostic and interventional radiologists and cardiovascular and general surgeons is necessary for definitive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of mesenteric ischemia can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this disease.

[Computed tomography diagnostics of acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia]

BACKGRAUND

Chronic mesenteric ischemia is more often accompanied by clinical signs characteristic of colitis. Acute mesenteric ischemia, unlike chronic, is accompanied by nonspecific symptoms and is a serious disease that requires urgent diagnosis.

AIMS

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of MSCT in the diagnosis of acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia based on our observations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The retrospective study included 135 patients with abdominalgia and suspected mesenteric ischemia who underwent multiphase CT of the abdominal cavity with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement. Group 1 included 105 patients with mesenteric ischemia; group 2 included 30, without confirmed mesenteric ischemia, with the presence of a symptom of mesenteric ischemia in the form of abdominalgia.

RESULTS

We studied 135 patients, including 105 patients with mesenteric ischemia, 59 women and 46 men of average age 60±14.9 years. The acute form of ischemia (58%) was determined 1.5 times more often than the chronic one. Occlusive and nonocclusive acute mesenteric ischemia occurred in equal proportions. Mesenteric arterial thrombosis was the cause of acute mesenteric ischemia in 23% of cases. Mesenteric venous thrombosis was the cause of chronic intestinal ischemia in 61%, in 5% - acute form. Mixed arterial-venous genesis of mesenteric ischemia was determined in 4% against the background of strangulation obstruction. Dunbar syndrome as a cause of chronic intestinal ischemia was diagnosed in 16%. Chronic ischemic enterocolitis accounted for 10% of all cases of mesenteric ischemia and 23% of chronic ischemia. Symptoms and symptom complexes characteristic of the studied series of diseases with acute or chronic mesenteric ischemia were delineated. Sensitivity, specificity and prognostic value of CT with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement in diagnostics of diseases accompanied by mesenteric ischemia reached 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiphase CT of the abdominal cavity with bolus contrast enhancement is highly informative in the diagnosis of acute and chronic forms of mesenteric ischemia. Direct CT signs of impaired blood flow in the arteries or veins of the mesentery were indisputable. Indirect signs of mesenteric ischemia were aimed at a thorough analysis of the condition of mesenteric vessels.

Acute type A aortic dissection with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome: a case report

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute type A aortic dissection and mesenteric malperfusion syndrome (mesMPS) have a high mortality rate. Therefore, the analysis of the timing of open aortic repair and intestinal operation is of great significance for the timely selection of clinical treatment.

CASE SUMMARY

The chief complaints of the patient were sudden chest and back bursting pain for 15 h. Emergency "ascending aorta replacement + total arch replacement (island flap anastomosis) + descending aorta stent implantation + coronary artery bypass grafting + autologous vascular access" was performed. The patient's postoperative occult blood test was positive. His blood stool was visible to the naked eye on the 11^th day after the open aortic repair. He had abdomen tenderness on the 12^th postoperative day. He had abdominal pain and was diagnosed by CT with intestinal obstruction on the 13^th postoperative day. Then, he underwent an emergency laparotomy for right hemicolectomy + partial resection of small intestine + cholecystectomy + ileostomy. He was discharged with diagnoses of aortic dissection (type A), coronary dissection, multiple perforations of the colon, congenital ectopic small bowel glands, and acute attack of chronic cholecystitis. More than a year later, he underwent "intestinal adhesion lysis + ileostomy closure + incisional hernia repair". The patient recovered well at the 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

We have reported a case of acute type A aortic dissection with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome. In the early stage of mesenteric hypoperfusion syndrome, specific laboratory examination indexes and clinical manifestations are lacking, and mesenteric multidetector CT angiography is a first-line examination method for mesenteric malperfusion. Through the detailed analysis of the patient's condition and the review of the relevant literature, we hope to have a deeper understanding of this condition and provide evidence supporting the formulation of clinical treatment plan.