The storm of NGS in NSCLC diagnostic-therapeutic pathway: How to sun the real clinical practice

Modern era systemic therapies: Expanding concepts of cure in early and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Cure of cancer is a sensitive and multidimensional concept that is challenging to define, difficult to assert at the individual patient level, and often surrounded by controversy. The notion of cure in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed and continues to evolve with improvements in diagnosis and treatment. Targeted and immune therapies have recently entered the treatment landscape of stage I-III NSCLC. While some initial pivotal trials of such agents failed to improve survival, recently approved epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (in EGFR-mutated NSCLC) and immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown delays in disease recurrence or progression and unprecedented survival gains compared to previous standards of care. Additional data is now emerging supporting the benefit of treatment strategies based on alternation-matched targeting (anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK] inhibition in ALK-altered disease) and immune checkpoint inhibition in stage I-III NSCLC. Similar to previous developments in the treatment of early and locally advanced NSCLC, it is expected that statistically significant and clinically meaningful trial-level benefits will translate into real-world benefits, including improvements in cure measures. Parallel advances in molecular testing (e.g., circulating tumor DNA analyses) are also allowing for a deeper and more comprehensive characterization of disease status and treatment response. Given the impact that curative-intent treatments have on survival, it is critical that various stakeholders, including clinicians and patients, are aware of new opportunities to pursue cure in stage I-III NSCLC.

Clinical Validity and Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Testing in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (aNSCLC): A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing has become a promising tool to guide first-line (1L) targeted treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). This study aims to estimate the clinical validity (CV) and clinical utility (CU) of ctDNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) for oncogenic driver mutations to inform 1L treatment decisions in aNSCLC through a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase to identify randomized control trials or observational studies reporting CV/CU on ctDNA testing in patients with aNSCLC. Meta-analyses were performed using bivariate random-effects models to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity. Progression-free/overall survival (PFS/OS) was summarized for CU studies.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were identified: 17 CV only, 2 CU only, and 1 both, and 13 studies were included for the meta-analysis on multi-gene detection. The overall sensitivity and specificity for ctDNA detection of any mutation were 0.69 (95% CI 0.63-0.74) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1.00), respectively. However, sensitivity varied greatly by driver gene, ranging from 0.29 (95% CI 0.13-0.53) for ROS1 to 0.77 (95% CI 0.63-0.86) for KRAS. Two studies that compared PFS with ctDNA versus tissue-based testing followed by 1L targeted therapy found no significant differences. One study reported OS curves on ctDNA-matched and tissue-matched therapies but no hazard ratios were provided.

CONCLUSIONS

ctDNA testing demonstrated an overall acceptable diagnostic accuracy in patients with aNSCLC, however, sensitivity varied greatly by driver mutation. Further research is needed, especially for uncommon driver mutations, to better understand the CU of ctDNA testing in guiding targeted treatments for aNSCLC.

Front-line liquid biopsy for early molecular assessment and treatment of hospitalized lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Molecular characterization is pivotal for managing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although this process is often time-consuming and patients' conditions might worsen while molecular analyses are processed. Our primary aim was to evaluate the performance of "up-front" next-generation sequencing (NGS) through liquid biopsy (LB) of hospitalized patients with newly detected lung neoplasm in parallel with conventional diagnosis. The secondary aim included longitudinal monitoring through LB of patients with oncogenic alterations at baseline.

METHODS

We enrolled 47 consecutive patients immediately after hospitalization and radiological detection of symptomatic lung neoplasm. LB from peripheral blood was performed at baseline, in parallel with conventional biopsy (CB), when feasible. Additionally, LBs were repeated during treatment in patients with actionable gene alterations at baseline. Oncomine™ Lung cfTNA Research Assay panel was employed for processing plasma samples in NGS.

RESULTS

47 hospitalized patients were enrolled. LB identified 28 patients with gene alterations, including mutations of EGFR (n = 7), KRAS (n = 12), ERBB2 (n = 1), TP53 (n = 2), BRAF (n = 1), one ALK rearrangement, and 4 patients with combined mutations involving EGFR, KRAS and PIK3CA. LB and CB were consistent, except for two patients. Three patients with positive LB for oncogenic drivers did not undergo CB due to contraindications. Median time to molecular results after LB was significantly lower compared to time to molecular report after CB (11 versus 22 days, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite limited numbers, our study supports the role of front-line LB for improving management of symptomatic patients with lung cancer, potentially leading to early targeted therapy initiation.

Efficacy and tolerability of capmatinib in a very elderly patient with metastatic NSCLC harboring a MET exon 14 mutation

We report the case of an 87-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutation (MET ex14) and PD-L1 expression of 60%. A first-line treatment with atezolizumab was started with primary resistance. Then, a second-line treatment with capmatinib, a selective type Ib MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was started, achieving a partial response. The patient is still alive and on treatment with capmatinib 300 mg twice daily after 20 months, with a good tolerability and no evidence of disease progression.In summary, our patient experienced a long-lasting response (>18 months) with capmatinib as second-line treatment. Further analyses evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors are warranted, especially in the elderly, a non-small-cell lung cancer population whose tumors could more frequently harbor MET ex14 mutation.

Recommendations for reporting tissue and circulating tumour (ct)DNA next-generation sequencing results in non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer is a heterogeneous disease and molecular characterisation plays an important role in its clinical management. Next-generation sequencing-based panel testing enables many molecular alterations to be interrogated simultaneously, allowing for comprehensive identification of actionable oncogenic drivers (and co-mutations) and appropriate matching of patients with targeted therapies. Despite consensus in international guidelines on the importance of broad molecular profiling, adoption of next-generation sequencing varies globally. One of the barriers to its successful implementation is a lack of accepted standards and guidelines specifically for the reporting and clinical annotation of next-generation sequencing results. Based on roundtable discussions between pathologists and oncologists, we provide best practice recommendations for the reporting of next-generation sequencing results in non-small cell lung cancer to facilitate its use and enable easy interpretation for physicians. These are intended to complement existing guidelines related to the use of next-generation sequencing (solid and liquid). Here, we discuss next-generation sequencing workflows, the structure of next-generation sequencing reports, and our recommendations for best practice thereof. The aim of these recommendations and considerations is ultimately to ensure that reports are fully interpretable, and that the most appropriate treatment options are selected based on robust molecular profiles in well-defined reports.

Current status of molecular diagnostics for lung cancer

The management of lung cancer (LC) requires the analysis of a diverse spectrum of molecular targets, including kinase activating mutations in EGFR, ERBB2 (HER2), BRAF and MET oncogenes, KRAS G12C substitutions, and ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK1-3 gene fusions. Administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is based on the immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of PD-L1 expression and determination of tumor mutation burden (TMB). Clinical characteristics of the patients, particularly age, gender and smoking history, significantly influence the probability of finding the above targets: for example, LC in young patients is characterized by high frequency of kinase gene rearrangements, while heavy smokers often have KRAS G12C mutations and/or high TMB. Proper selection of first-line therapy influences overall treatment outcomes, therefore, the majority of these tests need to be completed within no more than 10 working days. Activating events in MAPK signaling pathway are mutually exclusive, hence, fast single-gene testing remains an option for some laboratories. RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) is capable of detecting the entire repertoire of druggable gene alterations, therefore it is gradually becoming a dominating technology in LC molecular diagnosis.

The Importance of Biomarker Testing in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Podcast

The identification of actionable biomarkers and development of targeted therapies have revolutionized the field of lung cancer treatment. In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), biomarker testing can inform selection of effective targeted therapies as well as avoid therapies that are less likely to be effective in certain populations. A growing number of actionable targets, including those involving EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, KRAS, NTRK, RET, HER2, and PD-L1, can be identified with biomarker testing. More than half of patients with advanced NSCLC have tumors that harbor genetic alterations that can be targeted. When these patients are treated with targeted therapy, survival and quality of life may be significantly improved. In addition, broad-based molecular testing may detect alterations identifying patients who are potentially eligible for current or future clinical trials. Comprehensive biomarker testing rates in communities are often low, and turnaround times for results can be unacceptably long. There is an unmet need for widespread, efficient, and routine testing of all biomarkers recommended by clinical guidelines. New testing techniques and technologies can make this an attainable goal. Panel-based sequencing platforms are becoming more accessible, and molecular biomarker analysis of circulating tumor DNA is becoming more common. In this podcast, we discuss the importance of biomarker testing in advanced NSCLC and explore topics such as testing methodologies, effect of biomarker testing on patient outcomes, emerging technologies, and strategies for improving testing rates in the United States. Supplementary file1 (MP4 121301 KB).

Economic assessment of NGS testing workflow for NSCLC in a healthcare setting

Background

The molecular diagnostic and therapeutic pathway of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) stands as a successful example of precision medicine. The scarcity of material and the increasing number of biomarkers to be tested have prompted the routine application of next-generation-sequencing (NGS) techniques. Despite its undeniable advantages, NGS involves high costs that may impede its broad adoption in laboratories. This study aims to assess the detailed costs linked to the integration of NGS diagnostics in NSCLC to comprehend their financial impact.

Materials and methods

The retrospective analysis encompasses 210 cases of early and advanced stages NSCLC, analyzed with NGS and collected at the IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori Foundation (Monza, Italy). Molecular analyses were conducted on FFPE samples, with an hotspot panel capable of detecting DNA and RNA variants in 50 clinically relevant genes. The economic analysis employed a full-cost approach, encompassing direct and indirect costs, overheads, VAT (Value Added Tax).

Results

We estimate a comprehensive cost for each sample of €1048.32. This cost represents a crucial investment in terms of NSCLC patients survival, despite constituting only around 1% of the expenses incurred in their molecular diagnostic and therapeutic pathway.

Conclusions

The cost comparison between NGS test and the notably higher therapeutic costs highlights that the diagnostic phase is not the limiting economic factor. Developing NGS facilities structured in pathology networks may ensure appropriate technical expertise and efficient workflows.

Next-generation sequencing using tissue specimen collected with a 1.1 mm-diameter cryoprobe in patients with lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis is considered standard for lung cancer diagnosis in clinical practice. Little is known about the feasibility of NGS using tumour tissue sampled with a 1.1 mm-diameter cryoprobe. We aimed to investigate the suitability of specimens obtained by transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBC) using a 1.1 mm-diameter cryoprobe for NGS analysis.

METHODS

Patients with lung cancer who underwent TBC using a 1.1 mm-diameter cryoprobe for NGS testing between October 2020 and April 2023 were enrolled. A 4.0- or 3.0 mm-diameter bronchoscope with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound and virtual bronchoscopic navigation was used to detect peripheral lung lesions. All procedures were performed under fluoroscopic guidance. Data were analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients underwent TBC using a 1.1 mm cryoprobe for NGS testing, during the study period. Most patients (98%) were in the advanced stage of lung cancer (recurrent or inoperable disease of stages III or IV). The diagnostic yield of NGS for DNA and RNA sequencing was 95% each (53 of 56). Moderate bleeding was noted in three patients (5%) and none of the study patients developed life-threatening complications, such as pneumothorax or lung infection.

CONCLUSION

TBC using a 1.1 mm-diameter cryoprobe is a useful and safe tool for NGS analysis, for both DNA and RNA sequencing.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Testing on Reference Specimens: An Italian Multicenter Experience

INTRODUCTION

Biomarker testing is mandatory for the clinical management of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Myriads of technical platforms are now available for biomarker analysis with differences in terms of multiplexing capability, analytical sensitivity, and turnaround time (TAT). We evaluated the technical performance of the diagnostic workflows of 24 representative Italian institutions performing molecular tests on a series of artificial reference specimens built to mimic routine diagnostic samples.

METHODS

Sample sets of eight slides from cell blocks of artificial reference specimens harboring exon 19 EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) p.E746_AT50del, exon 2 KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue) p.G12C, ROS1 (c-ros oncogene 1)-unknown gene fusion, and MET (MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) Δ exon 14 skipping were distributed to each participating institution. Two independent cell block specimens were validated by the University of Naples Federico II before shipment. Methodological and molecular data from reference specimens were annotated.

RESULTS

Overall, a median DNA concentration of 3.3 ng/µL (range 0.1-10.0 ng/µL) and 13.4 ng/µL (range 2.0-45.8 ng/µL) were obtained with automated and manual technical procedures, respectively. RNA concentrations of 5.7 ng/µL (range 0.2-11.9 ng/µL) and 9.3 ng/µL (range 0.5-18.0 ng/µL) were also detected. KRAS exon 2 p.G12C, EGFR exon 19 p.E736_A750del hotspot mutations, and ROS1 aberrant transcripts were identified in all tested cases, whereas 15 out of 16 (93.7%) centers detected MET exon 14 skipping mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimized technical workflows are crucial in the decision-making strategy of patients with NSCLC. Artificial reference specimens enable optimization of diagnostic workflows for predictive molecular analysis in routine clinical practice.

Clinical validity and utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC): a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing has become a promising tool to guide first-line (1L) targeted treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). This study aims to estimate the clinical validity (CV) and clinical utility (CU) of ctDNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) for oncogenic driver mutations to inform 1L treatment decisions in aNSCLC through a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase to identify randomized control trials or observational studies reporting CV/CU on ctDNA testing in patients with aNSCLC. Meta-analyses were performed using bivariate random-effects models to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity. Progression-free/overall survival (PFS/OS) was summarized for CU studies.

Results

Eighteen studies were identified: 17 CV only, 2 CU only, and 1 both. Thirteen studies were included for the meta-analysis on multi-gene detection. The overall sensitivity and specificity for ctDNA detection of any mutation were 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.74) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.00) respectively. However, sensitivity varied greatly by driver gene, ranging from 0.29 (95% CI, 0.13-0.53) for ROS 1 to 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63-0.86) for KRAS . Two studies compared PFS with ctDNA versus tissue-based testing followed by 1L targeted therapy found no significant differences. One study reported OS curves on ctDNA-matched and tissue-matched therapies but no hazard ratios were provided.

Conclusion

ctDNA testing demonstrated an overall acceptable diagnostic accuracy in aNSCLC patients, however, sensitivity varied greatly by driver mutation. Further research is needed, especially for uncommon driver mutations, to better understand the CU of ctDNA testing in guiding targeted treatments for aNSCLC.

miRNA-Seq Tissue Diagnostic Signature: A Novel Model for NSCLC Subtyping

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) encompasses distinct histopathological subtypes, namely adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell lung carcinoma (SCC), which require precise differentiation for effective treatment strategies. In this study, we present a novel molecular diagnostic model that integrates tissue-specific expression profiles of microRNAs (miRNAs) obtained through next-generation sequencing (NGS) to discriminate between AC and SCC subtypes of NSCLC. This approach offers a more comprehensive and precise molecular characterization compared to conventional methods such as histopathology or immunohistochemistry. Firstly, we identified 31 miRNAs with significant differential expression between AC and SCC cases. Subsequently, we constructed a 17-miRNA signature through rigorous multistep analyses, including LASSO/elastic net regression. The signature includes both upregulated miRNAs (hsa-miR-326, hsa-miR-450a-5p, hsa-miR-1287-5p, hsa-miR-556-5p, hsa-miR-542-3p, hsa-miR-30b-5p, hsa-miR-4728-3p, hsa-miR-450a-1-3p, hsa-miR-375, hsa-miR-147b, hsa-miR-7705, and hsa-miR-653-3p) and downregulated miRNAs (hsa-miR-944, hsa-miR-205-5p, hsa-miR-205-3p, hsa-miR-149-5p, and hsa-miR-6510-3p). To assess the discriminative capability of the 17-miRNA signature, we performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, which demonstrated an impressive area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.994. Our findings highlight the exceptional diagnostic performance of the miRNA signature as a stratifying biomarker for distinguishing between AC and SCC subtypes in lung cancer. The developed molecular diagnostic model holds promise for providing a more accurate and comprehensive molecular characterization of NSCLC, thereby guiding personalized treatment decisions and improving clinical management and prognosis for patients.

Molecular alterations of driver genes in non-small cell lung cancer: from diagnostics to targeted therapy

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death all over the world. The majority (80-85 %) of lung cancer cases are classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Within NSCLC, adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are the most often recognized. The histological and immunohistochemical examination of NSCLC is a basic diagnostic tool, but insufficient for comprehensive therapeutic decisions. In some NSCLC patients, mainly adenocarcinoma, molecular alterations in driver genes, like EGFR, KRAS, HER2, ALK, MET, BRAF, RET, ROS1, and NTRK are recognized. The frequency of some of those changes is different depending on race, and between smokers and non-smokers. The molecular diagnostics of NSCLC using modern methods, like next-generation sequencing, is essential in estimating targeted, personalized therapy. In recent years, a breakthrough in understanding the importance of molecular studies for the precise treatment of NSCLC has been observed. Many new drugs were approved, including tyrosine kinase and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clinical trials testing novel molecules like miRNAs and trials with CAR-T cells (chimeric antigen receptor - T cells) dedicated to NSCLC patients are ongoing.

The Long Run towards Personalized Therapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current State and Future Directions

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, due to its high incidence and mortality [...].

Cost-Effectiveness of Next-Generation Sequencing Versus Single-Gene Testing for the Molecular Diagnosis of Patients With Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer From the Perspective of Spanish Reference Centers

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of using next-generation sequencing (NGS) versus single-gene testing (SgT) for the detection of genetic molecular subtypes and oncogenic markers in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the setting of Spanish reference centers.

METHODS

A joint model combining decision tree with partitioned survival models was developed. A two-round consensus panel was performed to describe clinical practice of Spanish reference centers, providing data on testing rate, prevalence of alterations, turnaround times, and treatment pathways. Treatment efficacy data and utility values were obtained from the literature. Only direct costs (euros, 2022), obtained from Spanish databases, were included. A lifetime horizon was considered, so a 3% discount rate for future costs and outcomes was considered. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty.

RESULTS

A target population of 9,734 patients with advanced NSCLC was estimated. If NGS was used instead of SgT, 1,873 more alterations would be detected and 82 more patients could potentially be enrolled in clinical trials. In the long term, using NGS would provide 1,188 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) in the target population compared with SgT. On the other hand, the incremental cost of NGS versus SgT in the target population was €21,048,580 euros for a lifetime horizon (€1,333,288 for diagnosis phase only). The obtained incremental cost-utility ratios were €25,895 per QALY gained, below the standard cost-effectiveness thresholds.

CONCLUSION

Using NGS in Spanish reference centers for the molecular diagnosis of patients with metastatic NSCLC would be a cost-effective strategy over SgT.

Combination of Osimertinib with Concurrent Chemotherapy and Hormonal Therapy for Synchronous NSCLC, Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer, and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Case Report

Patients presenting with multiple primary malignancies remain a growing challenge for physicians due to a lack of data for generalizable guidelines. Identification of driver mutations in carcinogenesis leads to the development of targeted treatment of many different cancer types, but its combination with other anti-cancer therapy is not well understood. We report a case of a 66-year-old woman who presented with triple-negative breast cancer, multifocal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, primary epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, possible primary lung adenocarcinoma of unspecified mutational status in the contralateral lung, and a solitary metastatic lesion in the brain from one of her primary cancers. She was treated with stereotactic radiosurgery and osimertinib in combination with carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel, doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, and letrozole, with excellent clinical and radiographical response. We did not observe synergistic toxicity or unexpected adverse events from the treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of concurrent osimertinib with these chemotherapy and hormonal therapy agents. As large-scale studies are difficult to conduct for these rare cases requiring exceptional treatment, it is important for physicians to build on the community's shared experience via case reports to better predict efficacy and safety of combining targeted agents with other conventional systemic treatments.

Bronchoalveolar Lavage as Potential Diagnostic Specimens to Genetic Testing in Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

Background: There is limited knowledge on the yield of performing capture-based targeted ultradeep sequencing on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens from advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This study aimed to evaluate gene variations and performance characteristics in BAL and tissue specimens using targeted sequencing. Methods: This cohort study retrospectively enrolled 20 patients with advanced NSCLC. The variant detection percentage, correlation of tumor mutation burden (TMB), and allele frequency heterogeneity (AFH) were compared between paired BAL and tissue samples. A three-tiered system was also applied for the interpretation of gene variants according to the guidelines. Results: No statistical difference was observed in variant detection between BAL and tissue samples (P = .591 for variant tier and P = .409 for variant type). In general, BAL achieved higher detection rates in tier I variants (96.2% vs 84.6%) and gene fusions (75% vs 50%) compared with tissue samples; tissue samples had better variants detection rates for other variants, such as tier II (89.6% vs 76.0%), tier III (87.1% vs 72.6%), single nucleotide variant (SNV, 89.6% vs 76.5%), insertion/deletion/duplication (InDel, 74.6% vs 69.8%) and copy number variation (CNV, 93.8% vs 43.8%). Besides, there were significant correlations of TMB (R2 = 0.96, P < .001) and AFH (R2 = 0.87, P < .001) between BALs and paired tissues. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that BAL may serve as a supplement in liquid biopsy for mutation detection and for routine utilization in clinical settings.

Ultrafast Gene Fusion Assessment for Nonsquamous NSCLC

Introduction

Gene fusion testing of ALK, ROS1, RET, NTRK, and MET exon 14 skipping mutations is guideline recommended in nonsquamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC). Nevertheless, assessment is often hindered by the limited availability of tissue and prolonged next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing, which can protract the initiation of a targeted therapy. Therefore, the development of faster gene fusion assessment is critical for optimal clinical decision-making. Here, we compared two ultrafast gene fusion assays (UFGFAs) using NGS (Genexus, Oncomine Precision Assay, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a multiplex reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (Idylla, GeneFusion Assay, Biocartis) approach at diagnosis in a retrospective series of 195 NS-NSCLC cases and five extrapulmonary tumors with a known NTRK fusion.

Methods

A total of 195 NS-NSCLC cases (113 known gene fusions and 82 wild-type tumors) were included retrospectively. To validate the detection of a NTRK fusion, we added five NTRK-positive extrathoracic tumors. The diagnostic performance of the two UFGFAs and standard procedures was compared.

Results

The accuracy was 92.3% and 93.1% for Idylla and Genexus, respectively. Both systems improved the sensitivity for detection by including a 5'-3' imbalance analysis. Although detection of ROS1, MET exon 14 skipping, and RET was excellent with both systems, ALK fusion detection was reduced with sensitivities of 87% and 88%, respectively. Idylla had a limited sensitivity of 67% for NTRK fusions, in which only an imbalance assessment was used.

Conclusions

UFGFA using NGS and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction approaches had an equal level of detection of gene fusion but with some technique-specific limitations. Nevertheless, UFGFA detection in routine clinical care is feasible with both systems allowing faster initiation of therapy and a broad degree of screening.

Dual NGS Comparative Analysis of Liquid Biopsy (LB) and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Samples of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC)

Lung cancer ranks second worldwide after breast cancer and third in Europe after breast and colorectal cancers when both sexes and all ages are considered. In this context, the aim of this study was to emphasize the power of dual analysis of the molecular profile both in tumor tissue and plasma by NGS assay as a liquid biopsy approach with impact on prognosis and therapy modulation in NSCLC patients. NGS analysis was performed both from tissue biopsies and from cfNAs isolated from peripheral blood samples. Out of all 29 different mutations detectable by both NGS panels (plasma and tumor tissue), seven different variants (24.13%; EGFR L858R in two patients, KRAS G13D and Q61H and TP53 G244D, V197M, R213P, and R273H) were detected only in plasma and not in the tumor itself. These mutations were detected in seven different patients, two of them having known distant organ metastasis. Our data show that NGS analysis of cfDNA could identify actionable mutations in advanced NSCLC and, therefore, this analysis could be used to monitor the disease progression and the treatment response and even to modulate the therapy in real time.

High Tumor Mutation Burden Is Associated with Poor Clinical Outcome in EGFR-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinomas Treated with Targeted Therapy

This study aimed to determine the association between TMB and treatment outcomes in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung cancer that were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The TMB was assessed using a 409-gene targeted next-generation sequencing panel. We compared the response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and frequency of secondary T790M mutations among the different TMB groups. The median TMB of the study population (n = 88) was 3.36/megabases. We divided 52 (59%) and 36 (41%) patients into the low and high TMB groups, respectively. A high TMB level was significantly associated with liver metastasis and more advanced stage (all p < 0.05). RR was significantly lower in the high TMB group than that of the low TMB group (50.0% vs. 80.7%, all p = 0.0384). In multivariate analysis, high TMB was independently associated with a shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.80, p = 0.0427) and shorter OS (HR = 2.05, p = 0.0397) than that of the low TMB group. Further, high TMB was independently associated with decreased T790M mutation development. These results suggest that high TMB may be a predictive biomarker for adverse treatment outcomes and represent a patients’ subgroup warranting tailored therapeutic approaches.

FFPE-Based NGS Approaches into Clinical Practice: The Limits of Glory from a Pathologist Viewpoint

The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the molecular diagnostic armamentarium is deeply changing pathology practice and laboratory frameworks. NGS allows for the comprehensive molecular characterization of neoplasms, in order to provide the best treatment to oncologic patients. On the other hand, NGS raises technical issues and poses several challenges in terms of education, infrastructures and costs. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the main NGS sequencing platforms that can be used in current molecular diagnostics and gain insights into the clinical applications of NGS in precision oncology. Hence, we also focus on the preanalytical, analytical and interpretative issues raised by the incorporation of NGS in routine pathology diagnostics.

Setting Up an Ultra-Fast Next-Generation Sequencing Approach as Reflex Testing at Diagnosis of Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Experience of a Single Center (LPCE, Nice, France)

The number of genomic alterations required for targeted therapy of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) patients has increased and become more complex these last few years. These molecular abnormalities lead to treatment that provides improvement in overall survival for certain patients. However, these treated tumors inexorably develop mechanisms of resistance, some of which can be targeted with new therapies. The characterization of the genomic alterations needs to be performed in a short turnaround time (TAT), as indicated by the international guidelines. The origin of the tissue biopsies used for the analyses is diverse, but their size is progressively decreasing due to the development of less invasive methods. In this respect, the pathologists are facing a number of different challenges requiring them to set up efficient molecular technologies while maintaining a strategy that allows rapid diagnosis. We report here our experience concerning the development of an optimal workflow for genomic alteration assessment as reflex testing in routine clinical practice at diagnosis for NS-NSCLC patients by using an ultra-fast-next generation sequencing approach (Ion Torrent Genexus Sequencer, Thermo Fisher Scientific). We show that the molecular targets currently available to personalized medicine in thoracic oncology can be identified using this system in an appropriate TAT, notably when only a small amount of nucleic acids is available. We discuss the new challenges and the perspectives of using such an ultra-fast NGS in daily practice.